R.I.P. Danny Jowenko - WTC7 Demolition Interviews, 2 of 3

[centurion180ad]

All fire & impact damage from WTC collapses would have to be factored in, and reflash and smouldering of fires would obviously slow this process.

Without a contract a company would not have purchase/ordered wire or explosives in advance, so they’d have to wait for the arrival of equipment.

WTC 7 must have been an advanced warning inside job.

[Hreohmod]

Mr. Jowenko is part 1 pointed to what he called "the heart", of the building which were 12(?) columns supporting the very center. Blow them and it will bring building down in a heap. If you watch video of #7 closely, it does in fact appear at the roofline that the center collapsed inward first then building dropped straight down.

[opaollie]

We Miss him

He is Murdered

[koertje]

@opaollie Truth is that he killed a tree.

[koertje]

@barthoedemaker nee joh, hij zoop teveel en arme boom dat hij die kapot maakte.

[barthoedemaker]

@koertje sukkeltje

[d082088]

I've won this argument WITH MANY WELDERS AND MECHANICS !! Try it and watch 'em get pissed when they realize they hung themselves with their own knowledge !! Tell 'em this- "If you say the "ragheads did it" ok, I'll trade ya your 2 tanks of oxy-acetylene for one tank of pressurized jet fuel since you understand cutting torches well. Now cut that piece of 1/2 inch flat bar right there with jet fuel as the torch fuel. Immediately they will answer "well it won't cut it, it ain't hot enough !" Laugh!

[glassandroid]

he's dead now?.. they kill everyone.. Aaron Russo this guy and all the rest..

911 was an inside j ob.

[911debunkerschannel]

9/11/2011 - Ten Years, No Justice

/watch?v=FxPaebHe3fw

[annie46664]

Really tragic. Given that he was a renowned expert in industrial demolition ~ his fate isn't at all surprising. Oh well! Those bastards can take as many more lives as they wish, but no amount of unnecessary & untimely deaths will help to hide the real truth ~ that 911 WAS AN INSIDE DEMOLITION JOB & the terrorists were within government & a couple of their cohorts abroad.

Danny can assist even better now from his new hugely advantaged, vantage point.

Love & LIGHT Danny!

~South Africa~

[TuukkaTT]

Anyway, Who was responsibility of the crash is USAs government. It was fair crash... Why he dead just now, a couple of months before "the revealing documentary"?

[Skeptic121]

Danny Jowenko is Dutch; he does not need US government permission to work. He can afford to tell the truth. If the American people actually start listening to him he will probably recant. The American government can find a way to put pressure on him. Perhaps he has children or family. Perhaps he will be arrested for something he did not do. Perhaps his license will be threatened. So far he is not important enough for the US government to care. This video has 20,000 views...

[RavenPrecept]

@Skeptic121 Prophetic words, he died in a car crash :-(

[Skeptic121]

@RavenPrecept

Hey, I did not think they would KILL him; I just thought they would make him recant...

[annie46664]

@Skeptic121 ~ If only your guess had been accurate ~ Danny & countless others would still be alive today.

I recently heard that more than 30 THOUSAND lives were actually lost as a direct consequence of 911 demolitions & 'inside job' missile attacks & not a mere 3 thousand. That does not include lives lost in their bogus wars either. I wonder?

~Durban~

[barthoedemaker]

The problem is we truthers can never win from the evil, because 90% is brainwashed :S

[NeutralExistence]

@barthoedemaker

Thinking like that defiantly wont help ya.

Don't worry, "America" is not the only country in the world. The French, Austrian, Norwegian, Japanese etc... peoples have quite large groups supporting the 9/11 reinvestigation to my understanding.

[barthoedemaker]

@NeutralExistence yeah sure

[dharshana81]

it's very rarely u feel that someone really knows what he is talking about. and this guy surely has that quality. 

[UBeeware]

These video's just keep getting better...

911 was definitely an inside job..

Unless of course you count American/Israeli dual Citizens as outsiders??

☺

[VCat2006]

A 30+ man team spending hours carrying explosives around a damaged and burned out / still burning office building of 47 floors, in the dark aside from flashlights and broken windows... That must've been a scary job if it even happened.

Since when do explosives "pull down" instead of "blow up"?

I think Silverstein meant "pull the firefighter effort from the unstable building": watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

[ISamuelII]

@VCat2006 Don't tell me that wise man Silverstein was so ignorant that he used an impersonal noun to describe humans. Pull 'them' would be the choice of word if he meant fire fighters so stop spreading lies about a wise man. If you follow his speech to PBS he continues on "and we watched the building collapse" clearly referencing the buildings fall. Besides that, there was no fire fighting operation in wtc7 and there wasn't for hours before the call. There's also a countdown to demolition.

[PapaOystein]

2:50 to 3:18: Again looking at a SILENT video to determine if there were cgarges exploding, masking the fact that there were NO LOUD BANGS. Danny would have spotted that immediately if the video had had sound. Go to his homepage: jowenko dot com. And listen in the intro how charges sound: LOUD BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG.

Missing from WTC7. Therefore, no explosives used.

End of story.

[ISamuelII]

Papa in a permitted demoliton the sound dampening windows are removed. Deserving a Duhhh

[PapaOystein]

1:55: "I don't know, it's guessing for me" - That about sums it up.

[jalusbrian]

Danny demolishes the official conspiracy theory

[pjt03]

WTC5 fires were more intense than 7.. & no complete collapse..

[Jrm4cam]

@pjt03 Yep, #6 was completly burned through yet all steel was still standing. They actually had to demo it. Why are people so nieve??

[VCat2006]

@Jrm4cam Do demo in 6? The only building known to store explosives? LOL.

[VCat2006]

@pjt03 WTC5 was also much shorter.

[Jrm4cam]

@VCat2006 So because a building is taller it's more prone to collapse?

[VCat2006]

@Jrm4cam Yes, because more weight is resting on fewer supports.

[Jrm4cam]

@VCat2006 I can tell your knowledge of building is lacking.

[VCat2006]

@Jrm4cam I can tell you're being ad hominem.

[PapaOystein]

Jowenko did NOT know that there were NO SOUNDS of explosions, WHEN WTC7 collapsed, HOW it was designed, that FIRES had raged in it, and at 1:53 he admits: "I don't know, it's guessing for me". BUT he talks about Silverstein and Giuliani and their motives - this guy obviously went uninformed but very biased into this interview.

[JPPolachek]

Totally....This is like a set up possible....or they already knew he was very biased....but even so.....he knows that no one is going to buy this BS TRuther theory....thats why practically no Engineers or demo people in the world believe their Nutty Truther theories......I bet if you took a survey of all Engineers and Demo People who know anything about the WTC less than 1% would believe explosives were used.....that would be a fun survey...maybee people opposed to the Truther Nuts should do it

[zenoist2]

@JPPolachek Only around 1500 professional architects and engineers and the number is growing.

How many percent of the population are either?

You count that as nothing eh?

[ISamuelII]

@JPPolachek "thats why practically no Engineers or demo people in the world believe their Nutty"

As you totally ignore the A&E for truth is packed full of signatory Architechs and Engineers demanding a lawful investigation into those crimes.

The fact you are not also asking for a lawful investigation means you are just fine with organized criminals dictating reality.

[arthurkitchen]

Wow you people must go through life always looking over your shoulders, buying stuff from spy catalogs, debugging phones, etc. Piece of shit Islamic terroritsts hijacked our planes, flew them into the trade centers and THE FUCKING HEAT FROM THE FIRES BROUGHT THEM DOWN, PERIOD! Truthers, false flag, conspiracy bullshit, damn you guys are just fucking wacked out of your minds! And most certainly our great president or vice president had nothing to do with it!

[forugh]

no you said almost certainly...

[arthurkitchen]

So you actually think that during this massive fire, surrounded by media, the fire dept, cops everywhere, people everywhere, a demolition team just strolled into the burning building, left, and detonated a building and nobody, NOY ONE person has ever came forth and said they were part of it? You guys are fucking idiots! Take a pill man!

[Glenmead]

No- I think it was done days or weeks before with military thermite explosive...

Buildings DO NOT collapse like that from Fire.

END OF

[arthurkitchen]

Man you are just crazy to even think like that. It is fools like you that think the amtrak facility here in Indy is a death camp for fema! Put down the crack pipe man!

[PresidentRich]

@arthurkitchen lol, the amtrak fema camp is a strawman. no serious truther believes its a fema camp.

[arthurkitchen]

Serious truther? Just that name is hilarious! I can just immagine how stupid those conversations are. Is that what you take about while playing dungeons and dragons? ha ha

[666jewkid]

even if ur not a truther. you still shoud know that a demolition takes atleast a couple months of planning. looks like ur the fuckin idiot

[abbyinertia]

it was done weeks previous to the event - look it up. There were mysterious power downs and floors evacuated; loud noises coming from above. Much dust in the floors below.

[PresidentRich]

Stop throwing out insults and actually say something with substance.

[mthai66]

Don't be stupid, the charges went in in 1995-96, same as the towers. After the '93 bombing, after the damage assessment, and after the decision was made not to let a collapse result from another '93 style attack. No conspiracy getting them in, and no conspiracy in bringing 7 down.

Not admitting it... that's another story.

[PoetryHound]

A collapse will always go in the direction of the force of gravity unless there is a lateral force or something else to prevent it. The "path of greatest resistance" has nothing to do with it, but it's something that is stated on some 9/11 conspiracy web sites, so you're simply repeating their error.

[NationalSniper]

He also gives other explainations for WTC7. He says it MIGHT have been demolished or that it might have collapsed because of the damage of the towers collapsing.

He also says that it is possible to take down the building in the short period after the WTC collapses by cutting the columns on the 1st floor.

And that the condition of the building was as such that it is understandable to demolish it.

This same expert said that the Twin Towers were definetly NOT blown up in the full program.

[Xeretza]

WTC7 is the smoking gun. 9/11 was an inside job.

[CNN911Fakes]

More analysis of that page being shown Mr. Jowenko

watch?v=FC9JZbpPOYg

It is from FEMA.

[TwoofersAreMorons]

911 was an inside Jobby Job. Its from FEMA

[SandovalAlarcon]

poetryhound is a fool, useful idiot, liar, enemy agent or some combination. Everyone watch architect richard gage's '911 blueprint for truth', diesel and office fires in a few places did not create statistically symmetrical collapse at almost freefall speed, anymore than i met with santa on the easter bunny's spaceship to hijack the deathstar. poetryhound is a fool, useful idiot, liar, enemy agent or some combination.

[NorwegianResident]

i cant understand, the only thing the truth movement wants is a new, thorough invesigation.. Why would any citizen stand in the way for such a demand? You spend billions on billions on a hoaxy war, but this you cant affort. What is wrong with you Americans?

[ISamuelII]

@NorwegianResident What is wrong with us? Organized criminals have been running the show for so long most have no clue they even exist. It is SOP here in every gov dept and office space.

(SOP = Standard Operating Procedure)

[sdemetri99]

Must be your page, Hound?

[PoetryHound]

"Given the pre-weakening of WTC7 indicated"

A single "blast" pre-weakens the entire building?

"evidence for thermite"

Nope, Steven Jones, who made the thermite claim, hasn't been able to get corroboration from any metallurgists, materials engineers, or incendiary/demo experts.

"this video showing pre-collapse detonations"

No, it doesn't show that at all. Why would you continue to lie about that?.

Why would FDNY say they were concerned about collapse if the whole thing was planned?

[AMERSIDD]

how on earth did the BBC report the collapse of Building 7 before it happened? Psychic clairvoyance? Of course they were told that WTC 7 was coming down, just like the firefighters, police, first responders and CNN were told it was coming down. They had to have had a source for making such a claim. The BBC is acting like the naughty little boy who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar!!

[McHrozni]

Can someone explain the rationale of the conspirators to warn the media of the impending collapse of the building 7?

What possible benefit would there be, especially in the light of the danger for the whole thing to be revealed because of that?

[buckybadger9876]

this is a great piece of evidence

[jimmyjamesmcgregor]

* reassert control of opium trade

* legitimise "pre-emptive" war

* shake "Vietnam Syndrome"

* to pass legislation that removes the rights of dissenters who object to these goals

So there are plenty of motives for a 9/11 inside job!

[jimmyjamesmcgregor]

MOTIVES FOR A 9/11 INSIDE JOB? * "war on terror" addictedtowar . com * WTC buildings needed repairs * insider trading * repatriations from Iraq to Kuwait * get Saddam * get Taliban * war on Iran? * help Israel * permanent military bases in oil rich Middle East * keep price of oil up gregpalast * "globalisation" * unipolar world order

[RichardC111165]

Please google NIST + WTC7 and look on page 26 of the report. Note the the west end and the east end of the main roof started dropping within a HALF SECOND of each other. That's probably why Danny Jowenko came to the conclusion he did from the video, which he did without knowing it was WTC7 on 9/11. Jowenko lives and works in Holland and seems to have no obvious motive to lie.

[einsteen]

And he also said:

Brent Blanchard is to the implosion industry as the Chickenhawk is to Foghorn Leghorn. "Quit Bothering me boy"

There was an ABC Documentary on Explosives demolition where they referred to Blanchard and his sidekick as the "Beavis and Butthead of the Implosion industry"

[PoetryHound]

I doubt any documentary referred to him that way. You have to have something on the ball to edit an industry publication. I notice that instead of refuting what he says, you try to character assassinate him. So what did he get wrong in his paper, in your expert opinion?

[einsteen]

NIST is not finished, FEMA was a joke. This is what demolitiondave (at JREF) had to say about Blanchard (contacted him no response):

I wouldn't read Blanchard's garbage. He has no experience with explosives,blasting or demolition. He is not an engineer either. He maintains an implosion website and during the day he monitors vibrations on pile driving jobs.

He is a self proclaimed "expert"

[PoetryHound]

An unidentified person the self-proclaimed nickname "demolitiondave" is your source for legitimate info? Not very credible.

[germanicelt]

Also between 5:35 and 5:55 Jowenko says that he can't imagine that b7 imploded as a result of the twin towers collapsing which then apparently started the fires which he was told previously in the official report. I do not know why you say Jowenko is not told about b7 being hit by WTC 1 or 2, or that it had a fire in it.

[PoetryHound]

Sorry, what I meant was that Jowenko was not told the extent of the damage from WTC 1. And again, he wasn't told that it had major fires raging in it (according to FDNY), that in footage with sound there is no sign of detonation charges, or that the collapse was expected by FDNY & other experts on the scene. He was not given all the information.

[Buckeyefarmer]

They told him about the fires. Don't you watch these videos before you debunk? They tried to asess the damage the best they could. Jowenko clearly says he wished he had more pictures of it. He gives his best opinion based on the info he has. He said he'd be "astonished" it it wasn't a deliberate implosion. He also clearly shoots down the idea of fires causing it to fall that way.

[PoetryHound]

He wasn't told the EXTENT of the fires, which were raging (according to the FDNY). Yes, he gives his best opinion, although he (intentionally?) wasn't given all the pertinent information.

[Buckeyefarmer]

Well, he saw pictures of the fire. I haven't seen any pictures that clealy show the extent of the fires. I don't think he was intentionally given inadequate info. The dude interviewing him seems to have the same questions. Hell, it looks like he's chillin' with him in his house on a Sunday afternoon. It's not like it's a set-up to fool Jowenko. Is there any more recent statements by Jowenko where he has looked at it closer and changed his mind?

[PoetryHound]

Nevertheless, he wasn't told the extent of the fires.

[einsteen]

I've tried to contact DD, but he didn't respond, maybe you could try.

[mortalmerlin]

There is a recored phone call with him a few months ago stating he hasn't changed his mind.

Any investigation into WTC7 that wasn't coming from a political angle would have to look into controlled demolition as an option. If this was some other office building that had been signed for and insured 7 weeks earlier then fell the way it did it would be considered the most likley cause. Any report commisioned that leaves out key possibilities is useless.

[germanicelt]

What on earth are you talking about, at the very start they are discussing WTC7 being hit by WTC1&2. Jowenko at0:24 "theoretically hits decently" and the interview then says "that has been confirmed". Pay attention. Between 4:55 and 5:20 the interview tells him that the official report says it came down due to fire and no mention of explosives being used. Look at Jowenko face.

[germanicelt]

Between 2:00 and 2:10 he admits clearly that the collapse of WTC7 was the work of man ie. controlled demo, not by fire (1:43). He also confirms that Silverstein ment "pull it down" when he said to pull it.(2:11)

[PoetryHound]

The interviewer didn't tell Jowenko the building got hit by WTC1, that it had major fires raging in it (according to FDNY), that in footage with sound there is no sign of detonation charges, or that the collapse was expected by FDNY & other experts on the scene. So he didn't have all the info that would have been useful to make a judgment. Jowenko is not a mind reader, so he can't confirm what Silverstein meant.

[germanicelt]

You have either not watched this video properly, or you are intensionally being deceptive. Either way you are not approaching this from a neutral stand point. You 911 CT of looking for anything to support there theory, but you are so sold on the 'offical story' that you are not listening to this with an open mind.

[PoetryHound]

The "proper" way to view this video is to not look at it in isolation. You need to consider ALL the evidence and not just base your conclusion on a video. You need to consider what the FDNY said about the condition of the building and their anticipation of its collapse. You need to consider that they neither heard nor saw demo charges go off at the time of collapse. You need to consider that seismic readings showed no explosives going off at the time of collapse.

[PoetryHound]

Remember: Unsubstantiated assertions are not evidence.

[inmemoryofRo]

ARROGANCE SPEAKS IN THE FORM OF POETRYHOUND!! Where is HIS evidence for his preposterous fantasy stories of pancake collapse etc?? Just keep on asking him for REAL evidence, as he does to you, and then ignore the non-sensical, unscientific & unsubstantiated lies that he puts forward as "truth". Either that, or ignore him. He is such a DEVIANT!!

[PoetryHound]

Hey Ro, stop foaming at the mouth. The correct term is actually "progressive collapse," not pancaking, which has a different meaning. My evidence? The initial report by the NIST engineers explains the collapse of WTC 7. How come you haven't read it? There's also the paper by demo expert Brent Blanchard and the analysis by physicist & engineer Manuel Garcia. It turns out that it's the conspiracy theorists that are anti-science and anti-intellectual.

[germanicelt]

PoetryHound, if you can not tell that WTC7 came down in a controlled demolition, then you are either a moron, or a gate keeper working to protect the globalists who carried this whole operation out.

[PoetryHound]

If you think Jowenko is credible, then you should be aware that he completely dismisses the idea that towers 1 & 2 involved planned demolitions. Also, since this interview in which he hasn't had time to really ponder all the evidence, he has decided that even building 7 wasn't a planned demolition. That means the conspiracy theorists are back to zero. They have no demolition experts they can point to that think any of the 3 collapses involved a demolition conspiracy.

[bopn]

Poetry Hound. This is such a complex situation with so many variables. What many people are looking for are answers to questions still unanswered. Dont presume everyone is a UFO abductee, Roswell area 51 survivor.

Many people just want truth.

[PoetryHound]

bopn, you're absolutely right. However, nearly all the questioners I've seen appear to have already decided there's a gov't conspiracy. You can tell by the kind of questioning they do & their dismissive & incredulous attitude toward anyone who disagrees with them. I have some questions too, mainly engineering ones. Since I'm not an expert in engineering, explosive demos, or crash site investigations, I have to listen to the people who are. Not just 1 or 2 of them, but lots of them.

[bopn]

I agree entirely. In fact i recently contacted one of the only group of specialists in the world who deal soley with the effect of fire on structure. I contacted them due to the some of the views being expressed on Youtube about issues such at WTC 7. They are currently looking at the NIST report. I will let you know what they say.

[germanicelt]

You are contradicting yourself. You are questioning Jowenkos credibility cause you claim he thinks WTC 1 and 2 did not involve planned demolitions. What you are saying then is that because he thinks 1&2 were not controlled demo, then he is not credible, yes I agree with you then, and for the fact that you assume he decided 7 was not a demo (which it obviously was) is only cause he didn't have time to really ponder all the evidence.

[CrunkChipmunk]

Its good to hear the truth from a CD expert for a change. Many experts have been bought off or scared by the U.S government into retracting previous statements made shortly after 911. True statements as compared to the official lie that NIST puts forth.

[einsteen]

thanks, it was a mega-job, I used some dictionaries and of course google for some expressions, couldn't hear a few words because even in this small country there are accents

[bc2208]

thanks for showing us the whole interview instead of some edited propaganda - your english is very good also!