Who ever did it HATES OUR WAY OF LIFE it has been over 10yrs now the smoke is cleared so lets evaluate who is still attacking OUR WAY OF LIFE in any and every aspect to CHANGE our way of life so it Sucks!
These cats need to do more research, Bushes brother took over security before 9/11, the bomb sniffing dogs where taking out, and they shut half the buildings down at a time well under "construction". and building 7 is known to be an implosion yet these cats say it takes weeks to set up a demolition, they are right so how can they not see they are contradicting themselves, lol Alex POWNT them.
S&P 500 is currently at 3 star, the Janus is at 3 star, and JP Morgan is at 5 star, based on Morningstar. I think that the Janus has downgraded since I last checked by 1 star. Could I redeem just one of the funds or would I have to redeem all the funds?
Oh give me a break. They already had NYPD that were in tower 7, and right outside of it when it collapsed, they lost a lot of friends that day. The NYPD that were there said there were no explosions, there was a gaping hole at the base, and the whole weight of the structure was leaning for hours. Give me a break. Towers 1 and 2 failed at the point of impact, everybody watched it on TV. This is just beyond ridiculous.
@WallStwizkid As for your self-proclaimed wiz-kid stats and rant on your channel, I learned all that shit in basic economics in high school. Your whole idea about inflation and the other crap you spew on your channel is a theory and not fact. You must be naive to think that facts are credible only if the courts can get an indictment filed. You seem to think that corruption is not a factor in anything you talk about. If you do work for Wall St. watch out because revolution is near.
@mxIllKill Did you finish high school? I think you have trouble reading, because I specifically stated in my channel that I was sick of debating libertarians online, because they don't even know basics. That was not supposed to be some attempt to show off, because not only were my points general, it's kindergarten stuff. I doubt you learned anything though, because you come back with "i learned that shit in high school." Okay pal, why don't you learn how to speak. Foul mouthed twit.
@mxIllKill I knew you would pluck out "waive". It was a typo, relax. I've taken some physics classes. There's more theories involved in physics vs. economics. There's about 1 part in 20 forms of matter that particle physics can explain. As far as facts go, any science takes evidence observed, forms a theory, and tests it. Most of the economics concepts practiced now, and all of which I mentioned, were developed by Keynes during the 1930s depression.
@mxIllKill I actually know some quantum physics professionals that switched over to finance to work. The mathematical concepts are the same, just applied differently, obviously. As far as this show goes, they do use bad language, I really don't care, but there's no reason to type like that. I don't watch stuff like that all the time. None of your concepts are "adult concepts." For starters, the market is all electronic now.
@WallStwizkid You sound like a smart guy, this is clear. I just see much corruption in the current system because the elite control it all. One could argue that the top 1% move most of the wealth of the country making the bottom 99% spending habits almost irrelevant. One could argue that the current system makes people slaves to debt that was created by the monetary policy in place by creating fiat money based on fiat bonds created from nothing.
@mxIllKill Even if robots took over as you imply, humans still design trading software and perform analysis. I could even go so far and say, once we figure out how to live forever, there would be no need for science. It's kind of funny how you mention physics, yet you're listening to people who have no clue how physics works and think 9/11 was an "inside job." Sorry, but these aren't "adult concepts." They're childish conspiracy theories.
@WallStwizkid Yes, they're theories, but with compelling facts that cannot not go ignored. If you listened, Alex provided sources for people to look up. I do not agree with everything he says, however some of it, like most interesting ideas, have truth and spin to meet an agenda. Alex is in the business of "conspiracy" so he must have some outlandish claims that are "iffy" at best. I do see a lot your points that you lay out and respect the free exchange of ideas so cheers to that
@mxIllKill Well you want disparity, you want people to actually want to become rich. You should know about the evolutionary spirit. It's not really created from nothing, the Treasury can't issue bonds if they didn't have tax entitlements. The gov. is supposed to work for the people. Using money as debt isn't a new concept, the goldsmiths did it back in the middle ages, and the greatest economic expansion in history was under the current system.
@WallStwizkid I think that with the rapid growth of technology, will change the system for the better. I feel that if the current system fails, which is a possibility in today's strange times, it will be a catharsis. People may live better with the machines and instead of a system based on self interest and profits, it could be a creative society free from working to pay off debt and could open an age where scientists can create without fossil fuels and other inhibiting factors.
@mxIllKill Yeah, likewise, you're not a fool, you seemed pretty bright which is why I didn't understand your support for him. But, I'm sure if I listened to him long enough I might find a few things I agree with. I did feel the need to get defensive, because I felt you attacked me for no reason. I don't mind a discussion with somebody that has conflicting ideas, it makes things interesting.
@WallStwizkid True, I could have left out the ad hominem, but this is youtube so it come natural sometimes. Sorry for that, usually I am typing to ignorant teenagers so I go to their level, my bad. As for planetary capabilities, 100% agree with that. Nice to see we can agree on things. Cheers!
@mxIllKill I actually agree with you on the last part of the last message you typed. We haven't even harnessed planetary capabilities yet, and still rely on oil, dead plants, coal etc. We have the capability to achieve so much more, but I feel that the human spirit is low right now, and there's a lot of division. I'm all for economic and spiritual unity, which means I'm all for evolution. There's just way too many people on the planet, and we're seeing a trend of overpopulation.
@WallStwizkid I believe if we radically redesign the way cities are constructed, the population issue could be dealt with. That and a different way of food production, waste management, and power sources. The current generation, thanks to internet, can solve problems much quicker than previous generations. It will be an interesting decade to say the least. Have you read any Ray Kurzweil? If his projetions are correct, the next 20 years will be a wild trip.
@mxIllKill What we seem to agree on is a lot more important to me than what we disagree on. I decided to go into finance to help people make money. I don't work for some bulge bracket bank, and out 6 clients only 1 is a corporation. Most of my clients are retail investors, and there's no greater feeling than helping people make money, financial hardships are the number 1 cause of stress in people over 25. I'm all for growth, I actually even agree with some of the occupy movements position.
@WallStwizkid I do not know much about finance, I have mutual funds in the Dreyfus S&P 500 Index, Janus Overseas FD CLT, and a JP Morgan Small Cap Equity Fund and I do nothing with them because I do not feel safe in today's market. As for my ideas on over population, I feel that people first need to take responsibility for their actions and only bring a child into the world if that child can be cared for, not impoverished. I feel technology can improve standards of living for all.
@mxIllKill Most investors are turning to ETFs over mutual funds, because they can be traded in shares, they're not solely structured on redemption's. As far as index funds go, the Vanguard Family offers a pretty good S&P fund, it's considered "safe indexing" by many pension fund managers. What you might want to do is, go check out Morningstar to see how they rate those funds you mentioned, they're pretty accurate. It's funny you should mention JP Morgan, cont..
@mxIllKill I attempted to inform people on here about the factors that weighed in on the financial recession, but it's pretty frustrating, so I just about gave up. Most people seem to automatically blame the Federal Reserve for everything. The housing bubble in itself was not a natural event. Easy credit on variable rate loans and little to nothing down encouraged speculators to flood into real estate to make a killing. The media is going to say dumb homeowners overextended themselves,
@mxIllKill But that's not what happened. Under current monetary policy, the only recession risks come from speculative asset bubbles, since injections of money can reverse any deflation. Since we abandoned the gold standard, there has only been two periods of deflation, one being the dot-com bubble which was caused by stock speculation in the tech sector, and of course the recent sub-prime crisis. Dot-com wasn't a big deal, let's talk about why housing was. In 1988, banks were on..cont..
@mxIllKill on what's called Basel 1 capital requirements. Not to be confused with reserve requirements, which take a liability on the right hand side of the balance sheet that must be held as an asset on the left, capital requirements group filings on the left and require a certain percentage that must be held as a liability or equity. This determines how much leverage a bank can obtain. If a bank has say an 8% capital requirement, they can obtain a leverage ratio of 12.5 (100/8). cont.
@mxIllKill The problem with this was, banks started taking the riskiest assets in around 5 different baskets, and just grouped them all the same. For example, corporate loans were all standardized in risk regardless of how far or close a company was from bankruptcy. Another fundamental flaw with Basel 1 was that it only addressed and limited accounting leverage. This means no restrictions on off balance sheets risks such as derivatives, or treasuries. Although treasuries are extremely safe.
@WallStwizkid Thanks for the info. I just inherited those mutual funds a few years back when I turned 21 and was told to just leave them alone. I see it as "pretend" since I do nothing with the funds. The JP Morgan fund is about 25% of my profile. I have heard that I can only cash out and invest in other fields, or I would need to pay someone like yourself who works in finance to move the money around, is this true?
@mxIllKill So in 2005, regulators decided that limiting accounting leverage wasn't too efficient, and they instead developed what seemed to be a much more rational Basel 2 model which limited economic leverage. This would include on and off balance sheet risks. The problem with this was, the SEC voted unanimously to allow banks with $5bill. or more in tentative net capital exemptions from Basel 2. They instead were allowed to calculate liquidation risks using their own mathematical computations.
@mxIllKill These proprietary formulas were based on probability, whereas smaller banks were actually filing adjusted net capital using current market rates. The result was, all those bulge-bracket banks such as Lehman Bros., Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan/Chase etc, achieved a lot more leverage than say, smaller community banks who actually experienced tighter restrictions under Basel 2, which was the original intention of the model. Notice how no community banks needed bailouts?
@mxIllKill If you look up the official explanation for the financial crisis, you'll see something like "complex financial products and the failure on the part of regulators to reign in on the excesses of Wall Street." That means exactly what I just described. Yes that's true, "cash out" is what I meant by redemption's. You basically have a percentage of equity in the fund, which is really just a bunch of capital the fund manager pools and invests across large, mid, and small cap. stocks.
@mxIllKill ETFs are pooled like mutual funds, but offered in shares. With ETF's you can independently trade shares on market exchanges, vs. mutual funds which are controlled by the fund manager, so you'd have to "cash out" by notifying the fund manager and he'll do a withdrawal. Morningstar rates funds, and they're pretty accurate. ETFs are pretty hot right now, investors like the flexibility they offer.
@mxIllKill Yeah no problem, so I'm actually about to leave work so I'll get back to you later, I was just curious if you had a specific idea about the population problem, basically what I asked you last night. I completely agree with you about the responsibilities in our culture, it's just a hard topic to talk about. I remember reading something you said about technology, maybe you could expand on that. What do you think about a tax on having more than one baby??
@WallStwizkid That is a hard question for me to answer because I never thought of a tax for more than one child. Don't people get tax breaks in the current system if they have children? The more kids you have, you get more on tax returns? I feel that with technology, the production of cheap & healthy foods and city restructure, we could forget about over population. This however is somewhat of a "pipe dream" to most. I've read that population is not growing as fast as before.
@mxIllKill I meant to say irresponsible behavior. I think I would get lynched if I said my tax idea in public lol. It's just a touchy subject, I don't know how to address it, but I see it as a major concern. I personally think commodity and food prices will rise till they discover their relevance vs. consumption, and extract maximum possible returns from consumers. We're also seeing emerging markets raising import quotas. We have to start looking at our resources in a finite manner.
@WallStwizkid But I do see your point about a tax, and see why some people would over react. I see if that was implemented, people might make a case that it could violate some human rights whereas one could argue that those funds from the tax could be used to address planetary problems that come with over population. I have also read that the Earth could support potentially tens of billions of people if the technology is there to support as well with ideas I pointed out before.
@WallStwizkid At the current rate of technology growth, which is about double per year, by the 2030s, one might see nanobots that could be ingested to fight off disease, repair damaged cells, even make us smarter. Have you seen 3d printing? With advancements in nano-carbons, one might be able to create goods in their house without the need to go to a store. This however would not happen in the current system because there would be no scarcity, and profits would go down.
@mxIllKill What I disagree with on is the way they're going about it. They're discrediting themselves. I got tired of "debating" people on here that didn't even know basics, which is why I outlined some basics on my channel. I haven't read any of that gentleman's publishings, but I'm interested. I'm actually interested in hearing your views on the population issue, because I view that as a major concern.
@WallStwizkid It does not take facts to prodcue a theory is what I am saying. Lets be clear here,someone can say that a kiebler elf created the moon, which is not based in theory. Everyone knows the moon is a moon, that is the only thing factual about the statement, however, theory is just reasoning, which can be based on facts or non-facts. Of course every theory explains the reasons on certain facts, but the reasoning does not have to be sound in facts..are we on the right page? SEMANTICS
@csley66 So you admit that it takes facts to construct a theory? The reasoning is based on the correlation between the facts. Your example provides no correlation, You are taking two things that you could not reasonably link together, therefore it is the ramblings of a mad man.
@mxIllKill My points on inflation are not "theory" it's fact. Saying inflation rates increasing 2,500% in Germany in 1923 is the worst case of hyperinflation is a fact. Saying OPEC raised oil prices in the 70s, coupled in with high unemployment rates which resulted in stagflation is a fact. Saying unexpected inflation benefits debtors and hurts creditors is a fact. Everything is a fact.
-A coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena.
-A proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
-This is from the dictionary, learn words before you start "blabbing" stuff.
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena. Most theories that are accepted by scientists have been repeatedly tested by experiments and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
@csley66 1. theory - a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural worldtheory - a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and theory"
@mxIllKill Yeah, they're all separate funds, so you're not obligated to adjust your position on the S&P fund if say, you withdraw from the mutual fund. The S&P 500 is an index fund, a little bit different than a mutual fund. An index fund basically invests proportionately throughout a stock index, in this case the S&P 500 which consists of the top 500 large cap. stocks of U.S. companies. The S&P is a broad based stock index. It's pretty simple, the market capitalization of a stock..
@mxIllKill The market capitalization of stock is simply the share price by the number of outstanding shares on the market. So if the company employs a buy-back program this will reduce the outstanding shares and the share prices will rise. Those shares will go into the corporate treasury so they're not outstanding. Okay I'm getting off topic, sorry. So the S&P 500 is a broad based index, and it's cap. weighted. This means the larger cap stocks influence the index more.
@mxIllKill So an index fund invests proportionately throughout a stock index. A mutual fund offers a broader diversification structure, mutual funds invest their assets proportionately throughout multiple indices. Hedge funds are extremely diversified and invest throughout many different asset classes. ETF's are exchange traded funds, they're like mutual funds only you're offered shares that you can independently trade on the stock exchange.
@mxIllKill The small cap. fund you mentioned is simply a fund that invests into stocks ranked with small market capitalization. That's a narrow based index, think of it as the exact opposite of the S&P 500.
@mxIllKill Yeah, on the W2s you list dependents. I file taxes as single, zero dependents, and I'm pretty happy. My dad was working for a Wall Street bank since before I was born and I never saw him, and I hated that. I know I have no time to focus on my career and a family, I really have no desire for that right now. I'm turning 31 this May and I can't see myself being tied down to one woman. I actually perked up and got some energy when I started reading your mention of nanobots
@mxIllKill I don't know if you read some of my reading selections on my channel, but I've been reading a lot books on Transhumanism in my spare time, and I'm extremely fascinated with it. You probably know this, it's the science of creating machines the size of molecules. I've been reading about nano-tech assembler machines that will be able to build at an atomic level, and replicate any chemically permitted form of matter. They'll be able to create organic tissue and eventually cont
@mxIllKill And eventually expand a humans lifespan. They also mentioned artificial neuro-chip intelligence. So all together with artificial intelligence and life extension technology, you're basically not human in the conventional sense, but rather entering into a phase of post-humanism. I'm highly intrigued by this and I'd donate money into the research and development of this technology in a heartbeat.
@WallStwizkid I suggest Ray Kurzweil if you are into transhumanism. He is a leading figure in that school of thought. He talks about all that stuff you mentioned about A.I. integrating with humans. He was the one who predicted a computer who beat the best chess champions in the mid to late 90s, and a lot of his other technology based claims have been quite accurate.
@mxIllKill Ohhhh I've heard of him!! I didn't recognize the name. Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. They ran some tests like that on the financial markets, only in the reverse sense, they put a monkey up against high-tech trading software, the monkey was randomly and instinctively picking trades. The chimp actually won lol. Pretty interesting stuff. Those chess programs are hard to beat. I used to play at this site, and I actually didn't mind when people used them.
@mxIllKill Oh you bet my friend. It was definitely a shock. It's a gamble when the markets aren't trading technically. Recently throughout the European debt crisis turmoil which peaked this past quarter, almost all markets were trading on macroeconomic developments. So here we're doing moving averages, ranging, running stochastic, high frequency algorithmic software, and low and behold the only two emotions investors have come into play (fear and greed), and it's a gamble.
@mxIllKill I never beat the programs they were using, but I came close once. It was pretty satisfying at the time for me, I like a challenge. I'm definitely going to check out the reference over the weekend. I've also been getting into metaphysics as well. In a nutshell, I believe the best hope for humanity to usher in the New Age is to have economic and spiritual unity, which have been the reasons for war and division throughout recorded time.
@WallStwizkid I think that the chess champion ended in a stalemate against the computer. Chess can be tricky especially when the computer can think many more moves ahead and different possible outcomes in split seconds.
@mxIllKill *stochastics...yeah those programs are usually 3 moves ahead of me, I got it down to one move, and I came really close one time. As far as the chimp goes, I wouldn't mind him next to me at the blackjack table. Close second to Rain Man.
@WallStwizkid I once read this study, chimps were taught the concept of money. First thing the male chimps did was give the money to the females in exchange for sex and the female chimps only mated with the chimps with the most money. Seem familiar?
@mxIllKill Really? lol no wonder why they're good at trading. I guess that's what they mean by monkey business. I did agree with you earlier, my tax scheme would never work, it's too outrageous. I think communist China pulled something like that in the 80s. I'm not really worried so much about supplies, more so about the heightened chance of more turmoil and violence we're seeing escalate, should the population grow at the rate they're forecasting.
I think humanity is at a pivotal crossroads to an unprecedented extent. I think we have two options right now, the dark path, or the light path. War is not a phenomenon, we know what causes war. I can't even voice my opinion a lot of the time, because people react as if I'm a traitor, or I committed some horrific act. That opinion is basically my desire to eliminate the concept of sovereignty. You may not agree with me but, I don't see the point in imaginary squiggly lines on a map.
@mxIllKill I get cyber-lynched for expressing a disregard of the constitution. I personally feel the constitution being a 200+ year old document was sufficient to address the problems faced in colonial America, and it's definitely part of our history. But I don't think we should look to the constitution as the be all end all of answers to challenges of the 21st century. In my opinion, a feudal state like Iran living in the dark ages and "constitutionalists" have something in common.
@MrWuldntulike2kno No, that's not what I said at all. I'd want to eliminate individual ruling states/countries and replace it with a new body that represents all. I don't think humanity can make it through another century of wars like we saw in the 20th century, especially with terrorism and nuclear capabilities. The EU is the most progress we've made, unfortunately I'm a rare breed of American that actually sees a positive influence in aligning interests with other nations.
@MrWuldntulike2kno By the way, I hope you know this video is complete nonsense. They interviewed NYPD and emergency personnel that were in building 7, there were no explosions. They explained exactly how they fell. This guy is a fear monger.
@WallStwizkid . The biggest reason for the constitution is to protect us from the Federal Government, no matter how old it is we need to be protected and our rights intact, which we are already losing.. Had our gov follow the constitution less people would hate our current globalist controlled government..
@mxIllKill Who is csley66? He's sending me a message and I think he thinks he's talking to you. Looks like he fell asleep in high school lab. Of course you need evidence to form a theory lol. Any of the sciences from economics to particle physics, you gather evidence, formulate a theory, and test it. This guy has no idea what he's talking about lol.
@mxIllKill Sorry but they don't teach Austrian theory in college, it's not mainstream. You'd know that if you actually took macroeconomics. Look, I'm sorry you're wacked
@mxIllKill By the way, nice channel. Why did you fill up four to five lines on occupation when you could've just said unemployed. Yeah you're a particle waive of endless possibilities alright, however I think most of those possibilities evaporated in a cloud of marijuana smoke.
@WallStwizkid I am employed, I just do not define myself based on who gives me fiat money unlike yourself. Yes I do enjoy cannabis, the proper term unlike your racist, fear mongering term like marijuana. No I am not a particle "waive" as you say (nice grammar) rather a particle WAVE, which you might understand if you study some quantum physics rather than BS Wall St. garbage, the wave particle duality principle, matter and light exhibit the behaviors of both waves and particles
@mxIllKill I'm sorry you're mentally ill, watching conspiracy theory videos, thinking you're smart. This kid thinks a general description of inflation is a theory because he watches libertarian videos and tries to pose like he knows what he's talking about. Come to lower Manhattan and talk about your libertarian views so we can laugh at you. By the way, there were witnesses to tower 7, also a fact, and if this crap were true, there would most definitely be charges filed. Bye
These aren't "facts" Alex. Facts are things you can prove, meaning, you go to a court and you get an indictment filed. Conspiracy theories are theories, crackpot theories mostly, but not facts.
(After listening to the whole interview)..I don't agree with AJ 100% but he definitely held his own against these childish, denial-ridden fools...."I can't accept that" is their response to what AJ has to say? Sorry he had to burst your comfort bubble, but O&A have no clue about the world they live in. God I can't stand those twits!
I like O&A but I'm disappointed in this. I HATE 9/11 conspiracies but Alex Jones at least fucking backed his shit up and Anthony defaulted to his usual "Ehhhhhh I jjuuuuusst don't see it happpening, I can't accept blahblahblah" bullshit. Bill Burr said it best, he's a loud guy with a microphone and he's got a nice enough vernacular to convince other idiots into thinking he's smart.
9/11 kooks like to ignore the fact that there are dozens of LOUD explosions before and during a controlled demolition. none of which were heard on 9/11. I mean LOUD. You should have been able to hear it from Brooklyn. Yet, nothing. No pictures of blastic caps, copper tubing, nothing. You idiots lost ten years ago. Give it up. You morons have NOTHING. No evidence. ZERO.
"i believe it was Extremists that hate our freedom" ......lol that sounds so ridiculous honestly.....why would you attack the biggest military in the world just because you dont like my girls booty shorts lol
@Sinamatics Probably. Revenge killings don't exactly hold a lot of weight in court. But thank you for acknowledging that they were the ones behind 9/11.
@CoolerKing37 um....#1 revenge killings definitely hold up in court...never herd of temporary insanity? #2 i didnt say anything about 9/11 at all nice leap tho lol....you must only read a few words of what i say because youve obviously missed the point EVERYTIME lol
@soulinite by that reasoning Opie and Anthony must definitely believe 9/11 was an inside job......i mean its so obvious they had Alex Jones on they have to believe everything he believes right lol
By the way, the only way conspiracies exist is one thing-- unanswered questions. Answer the questions, and they wouldn't exist. Furthermore, just because they label something "official" doesn't mean it is, for all you simpletons out there. Use your God given brain a bit more, and think deeper. I am dumbfounded on how much they try to insult my intelligence with "official" stories. See, I think for myself, gather many different sources of info, and make up MY OWN mind.
@Sorcoral I was going to let this go, and just let it stand on it's own stupidity, but I just can't. YOU PROVE MY POINT. They FOUND OUT, by answering their own question, and saw the Earth was ROUND--A LONG TIME AGO! It was a conspiracy, and it hasn't been for a long time, because THEY ANSWERED THEIR FUCKING QUESTION !!! I can't believe I even responded to that. Keep on jacking off to your favorited Jessica Alba video, and try to get out of the cold more up there, ey ?
Opie & Anthony are absolute tools. There are a lot of tools in America, and the world for that matter. They appeal to their audience. Simple. If you find them "entertaining" or "funny", more power to you, have a ball. If you listen to that show to learn something, you're simply in the wrong place. All those paid trolls, by the way, should be ashamed of themselves. All of you are absolute sell outs, and aren't making things any better, whatsoever. Godspeed to those who are seeking the truth.
@KenFan4life What the fuck did you just type ? Stay in Jay Z's basement please. Telling me to shut up online, tough guy. Stick to animation ignorant youngster, you have a lot to learn.
at 4:47 alex said he interviewed 3 types of people who said they heard the countdown to blow up building 7, then he said a reported said there WAS going to be a countdown indicating there was no countdown so he lied about the interviews if he had those interviews he would have told the show where to find them he is a strawman and the videos i made expose him as the fool he is, i destroy alex. check out my videos before you comment so you don't look stupid the way i prove alex to be.
That's their "arguments" always - while Jones can document most of what he says. JFK's head and body clearly are pushed BACKWARDS in the Zapruder film, but people still prefer to believe some "experts from the government" than their own eyes.
These guys don't want to look into conspiracies, so their brains will "PROVE" that there are none.
@TheHorsenation Entrance/exit wound. He was hit in the back of the head. Don't get me wrong, there's alotta shady circumstances about the JFK assassination but I don't think this is one of them. Numerous ballistics experts have come forth saying a body will sometimes react that way when hit from behind. Sometimes jerk back, sometimes jerk forward, sometimes to the side.
so why did his wife have to climb backwards to collect parts of his brains from the trunk of the car?
It all makes no sense. and actually I think he was shot from both sides, first from behind (but not from the schoolbook building) then from the front, grassy knoll area. Also major forensic and medical experts say he was shot from the front, so what are you talking about, but fooling yourself.
@TheHorsenation This is a PRATT argument. Ironically if you actually had done any research you'd know how silly using the "back and to the left" argument makes you look.
ProTip: research isn't uncritically accepting things you watch on the internet.
@TheHorsenation As for the Zapruder film, seeing with my own eyes, it is very possible that the fatal shot came from behind, the bullet entering the back of Kennedy's head and as it exited the front, the force created from the exit wound could and did propel his head backwards. Not saying that there weren't more shooters, but that final shot most likely did come from behind.
@ShaoD "the force from the exit propelled his head backwars"
lol, I dont rule that out completely, but it's just ridiculous. Also, I have seen a forensic analysis by a renowned doctor who also said he was clearly murdered from the front after examining all available evidence. I dont recount his name now, but it's on youtube also somewhere. maybe you know it.
anyway. it looks to me people who defend the official story just are afraid to face the truth, subconsciously.
@TheHorsenation Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the official story, I just accept that it's very possible and most liekly that the fatal shot came from where it was claimed. Even a congressional investigation found that it most likely involved more people and a greater conspiracy.
@TheHorsenation You're literally cmparing apples and oranges. Fruit and the human skull have different masses and densities. That's a really good idea though. I;d love to see a mock demonstration with either the head of a cadaver or something similar in mass and density to human skull to see what happens.
the point is, if you shoot through something, there is NOT an explosion happening at the exit hole that could push the thing "backwards". The stuff that flies out of the exit hole is being dragged along by the force of the bullet, literally ripped outwards, which would create a drag on the body (head) it was attached to before, thus move it in the same direction, and not backwards.
there's quite alot of evidence, including E. Howard Hunt's deathbed confession and written statements about the conspiracy to eliminate Kennedy. Don't be so sure who the gullible one is here.
Oswald was trained by US agencies and set up. on and on. get informed.
@TheHorsenation surrreee bud.... they wanted oswald out of ALL THE PEOPLE ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH to be a scapegoat. vince bugliosi proved you idiots wrong. go watch another episode of jesse venturas show. learn the difference between TRUTH FACTS AND EVIDENCE vs. entertainment and the ability to persuade naive gullible masses into thinking that they are now "in the know".
the "logic" in your Oswald argument escapes me somehow.
While I respect Bugliosi for various reasons his book and his opinion about Oswald is nothing short but a joke and totally disinformed. He even said there's no connection whatsoever of Oswald to any of these groups (like CIA) - which is plain wrong.
I would love to see Jim Marrs debate him on the topic. Maybe we can have it one day if Vince doesn't chicken out.
You called me moron several times unprovoked, kinda immature imho.
@TheHorsenation There is no connection. What do you have??? Where is it?! And not some prisonplanet website. I don't think vince is afraid to battle. I only said that because you think nobody on the O&A show has looked into this garbage over the past ten years. THEY HAVE, and they have dismissed it as they should have. The best one is Opie Anthony Bin Laden where Alex says he has been frozen on ice. /watch?v=xSgDOFl37j8
@TheHorsenation Jim Marrs? The guy who wrote 'Alien Agenda' and thinks that alien abductions are real, and that crop circles are made by aliens from other planets, and that the moon is an alien space ship? So since Jim Marrs was quoted , does that now mean that aliens are behind the September 11 attacks too? Vince is a prosecutor who goes off of facts and evidence. I am sure he would not only debate that nut, but DESTROY HIM on every level
Anyway writing about Aliens is legitimate, even if it's quite impossible to proof anything.
You don't need to ridicule 9/11 with Aliens or Antisemitism now, that's called a Strawman argument.
There is stuff to look into , like the deathbed confession of E. Howard Hunt, documents that claim Oswald was trained by Naval Intelligence, Bush senior reported a hitman, forensics claim frontshot...
also the funny defection of Oswald to the Soviets would support that he was on the CIA payroll and was being groomed for some job and kept on standby. He grew bored in Russia and returned to the US then and shot Kennedy? kinda weird thing to do.
@TheHorsenation The confession doesn't mean anything though. First of all it is obvious here say because he is dead. The man could have just been babbling for fame. It could be a complete lie. Oswald was a qualified sharpshooter, that's no secret. I just don't see a debate between Vince and jim Marrs happening. And I can't really find the man credible on the subject..But hey...who cares
@TheHorsenation You theorists are the ones "in denial". You want to believe your theories so bad that you will overlook logic. If you watch every different angle from that day, you will clearly see that
A: The exit spray leaving the front of his head.
B: No one on "The Grassy Knoll"
C: You actually see Oswald in the window.
All these films were recently made HD (or as HD as possible for an 8mm roll) and show just how wrong all of these conspiracies are.
Face it, he's? making money off of conspiracy-believing fanatics. You're like one of those people who turn on those infomercials in the middle of the night and believe it because they say they'll give you something for free, despite the fact that their claims (like Alex Jone's) are laughably preposterous. Typical scam tatctics. In the long run, Alex Jones is making money off his ability to capture the imaginations of gullible conspiracy-believing idiots.
I don't know exactly what I believe concerning 9/11, but the "They hate us for our freedom" excuse is BS.
kazoorocketman54 6 days ago
let these dumbasses believe what they want to..... they will be the first to go
Multianonymous73 2 weeks ago
fuck i hate these opie and anthony faggots
MrDavidDux 3 weeks ago
Who ever did it HATES OUR WAY OF LIFE it has been over 10yrs now the smoke is cleared so lets evaluate who is still attacking OUR WAY OF LIFE in any and every aspect to CHANGE our way of life so it Sucks!
TronaldDump420 1 month ago
Alex Jones is a fucking lunatic. He sounds more like a snake oil salesman than a news peddler.
AGoat1971 1 month ago
@AGoat1971 lol u prob agree with 9 of ten things he says....the 1 thing being 9-11 because u can't handle it
shmayy 1 day ago
These cats need to do more research, Bushes brother took over security before 9/11, the bomb sniffing dogs where taking out, and they shut half the buildings down at a time well under "construction". and building 7 is known to be an implosion yet these cats say it takes weeks to set up a demolition, they are right so how can they not see they are contradicting themselves, lol Alex POWNT them.
jocell202 1 month ago
1st of 10 vids down, Alex is on fire... this is gonna be good..... XD
mknomad5 1 month ago
I used to like Jimmy.. but now i think he is the ultimate DOOSH!
MrWuldntulike2kno 1 month ago 2
S&P 500 is currently at 3 star, the Janus is at 3 star, and JP Morgan is at 5 star, based on Morningstar. I think that the Janus has downgraded since I last checked by 1 star. Could I redeem just one of the funds or would I have to redeem all the funds?
mxIllKill 1 month ago
TEN FUCKING PARTS wow.
MrNickeh 1 month ago
Oh give me a break. They already had NYPD that were in tower 7, and right outside of it when it collapsed, they lost a lot of friends that day. The NYPD that were there said there were no explosions, there was a gaping hole at the base, and the whole weight of the structure was leaning for hours. Give me a break. Towers 1 and 2 failed at the point of impact, everybody watched it on TV. This is just beyond ridiculous.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid As for your self-proclaimed wiz-kid stats and rant on your channel, I learned all that shit in basic economics in high school. Your whole idea about inflation and the other crap you spew on your channel is a theory and not fact. You must be naive to think that facts are credible only if the courts can get an indictment filed. You seem to think that corruption is not a factor in anything you talk about. If you do work for Wall St. watch out because revolution is near.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Did you finish high school? I think you have trouble reading, because I specifically stated in my channel that I was sick of debating libertarians online, because they don't even know basics. That was not supposed to be some attempt to show off, because not only were my points general, it's kindergarten stuff. I doubt you learned anything though, because you come back with "i learned that shit in high school." Okay pal, why don't you learn how to speak. Foul mouthed twit.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid oh and sorry you listen to opie and anthony but cannot handle adult language, no wonder adult concepts slip right by you.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I knew you would pluck out "waive". It was a typo, relax. I've taken some physics classes. There's more theories involved in physics vs. economics. There's about 1 part in 20 forms of matter that particle physics can explain. As far as facts go, any science takes evidence observed, forms a theory, and tests it. Most of the economics concepts practiced now, and all of which I mentioned, were developed by Keynes during the 1930s depression.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I actually know some quantum physics professionals that switched over to finance to work. The mathematical concepts are the same, just applied differently, obviously. As far as this show goes, they do use bad language, I really don't care, but there's no reason to type like that. I don't watch stuff like that all the time. None of your concepts are "adult concepts." For starters, the market is all electronic now.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid You sound like a smart guy, this is clear. I just see much corruption in the current system because the elite control it all. One could argue that the top 1% move most of the wealth of the country making the bottom 99% spending habits almost irrelevant. One could argue that the current system makes people slaves to debt that was created by the monetary policy in place by creating fiat money based on fiat bonds created from nothing.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Even if robots took over as you imply, humans still design trading software and perform analysis. I could even go so far and say, once we figure out how to live forever, there would be no need for science. It's kind of funny how you mention physics, yet you're listening to people who have no clue how physics works and think 9/11 was an "inside job." Sorry, but these aren't "adult concepts." They're childish conspiracy theories.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid Yes, they're theories, but with compelling facts that cannot not go ignored. If you listened, Alex provided sources for people to look up. I do not agree with everything he says, however some of it, like most interesting ideas, have truth and spin to meet an agenda. Alex is in the business of "conspiracy" so he must have some outlandish claims that are "iffy" at best. I do see a lot your points that you lay out and respect the free exchange of ideas so cheers to that
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Well you want disparity, you want people to actually want to become rich. You should know about the evolutionary spirit. It's not really created from nothing, the Treasury can't issue bonds if they didn't have tax entitlements. The gov. is supposed to work for the people. Using money as debt isn't a new concept, the goldsmiths did it back in the middle ages, and the greatest economic expansion in history was under the current system.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I think that with the rapid growth of technology, will change the system for the better. I feel that if the current system fails, which is a possibility in today's strange times, it will be a catharsis. People may live better with the machines and instead of a system based on self interest and profits, it could be a creative society free from working to pay off debt and could open an age where scientists can create without fossil fuels and other inhibiting factors.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Yeah, likewise, you're not a fool, you seemed pretty bright which is why I didn't understand your support for him. But, I'm sure if I listened to him long enough I might find a few things I agree with. I did feel the need to get defensive, because I felt you attacked me for no reason. I don't mind a discussion with somebody that has conflicting ideas, it makes things interesting.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid True, I could have left out the ad hominem, but this is youtube so it come natural sometimes. Sorry for that, usually I am typing to ignorant teenagers so I go to their level, my bad. As for planetary capabilities, 100% agree with that. Nice to see we can agree on things. Cheers!
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I actually agree with you on the last part of the last message you typed. We haven't even harnessed planetary capabilities yet, and still rely on oil, dead plants, coal etc. We have the capability to achieve so much more, but I feel that the human spirit is low right now, and there's a lot of division. I'm all for economic and spiritual unity, which means I'm all for evolution. There's just way too many people on the planet, and we're seeing a trend of overpopulation.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I believe if we radically redesign the way cities are constructed, the population issue could be dealt with. That and a different way of food production, waste management, and power sources. The current generation, thanks to internet, can solve problems much quicker than previous generations. It will be an interesting decade to say the least. Have you read any Ray Kurzweil? If his projetions are correct, the next 20 years will be a wild trip.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill What we seem to agree on is a lot more important to me than what we disagree on. I decided to go into finance to help people make money. I don't work for some bulge bracket bank, and out 6 clients only 1 is a corporation. Most of my clients are retail investors, and there's no greater feeling than helping people make money, financial hardships are the number 1 cause of stress in people over 25. I'm all for growth, I actually even agree with some of the occupy movements position.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I do not know much about finance, I have mutual funds in the Dreyfus S&P 500 Index, Janus Overseas FD CLT, and a JP Morgan Small Cap Equity Fund and I do nothing with them because I do not feel safe in today's market. As for my ideas on over population, I feel that people first need to take responsibility for their actions and only bring a child into the world if that child can be cared for, not impoverished. I feel technology can improve standards of living for all.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Most investors are turning to ETFs over mutual funds, because they can be traded in shares, they're not solely structured on redemption's. As far as index funds go, the Vanguard Family offers a pretty good S&P fund, it's considered "safe indexing" by many pension fund managers. What you might want to do is, go check out Morningstar to see how they rate those funds you mentioned, they're pretty accurate. It's funny you should mention JP Morgan, cont..
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I attempted to inform people on here about the factors that weighed in on the financial recession, but it's pretty frustrating, so I just about gave up. Most people seem to automatically blame the Federal Reserve for everything. The housing bubble in itself was not a natural event. Easy credit on variable rate loans and little to nothing down encouraged speculators to flood into real estate to make a killing. The media is going to say dumb homeowners overextended themselves,
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill But that's not what happened. Under current monetary policy, the only recession risks come from speculative asset bubbles, since injections of money can reverse any deflation. Since we abandoned the gold standard, there has only been two periods of deflation, one being the dot-com bubble which was caused by stock speculation in the tech sector, and of course the recent sub-prime crisis. Dot-com wasn't a big deal, let's talk about why housing was. In 1988, banks were on..cont..
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill on what's called Basel 1 capital requirements. Not to be confused with reserve requirements, which take a liability on the right hand side of the balance sheet that must be held as an asset on the left, capital requirements group filings on the left and require a certain percentage that must be held as a liability or equity. This determines how much leverage a bank can obtain. If a bank has say an 8% capital requirement, they can obtain a leverage ratio of 12.5 (100/8). cont.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill The problem with this was, banks started taking the riskiest assets in around 5 different baskets, and just grouped them all the same. For example, corporate loans were all standardized in risk regardless of how far or close a company was from bankruptcy. Another fundamental flaw with Basel 1 was that it only addressed and limited accounting leverage. This means no restrictions on off balance sheets risks such as derivatives, or treasuries. Although treasuries are extremely safe.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid Thanks for the info. I just inherited those mutual funds a few years back when I turned 21 and was told to just leave them alone. I see it as "pretend" since I do nothing with the funds. The JP Morgan fund is about 25% of my profile. I have heard that I can only cash out and invest in other fields, or I would need to pay someone like yourself who works in finance to move the money around, is this true?
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill So in 2005, regulators decided that limiting accounting leverage wasn't too efficient, and they instead developed what seemed to be a much more rational Basel 2 model which limited economic leverage. This would include on and off balance sheet risks. The problem with this was, the SEC voted unanimously to allow banks with $5bill. or more in tentative net capital exemptions from Basel 2. They instead were allowed to calculate liquidation risks using their own mathematical computations.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill These proprietary formulas were based on probability, whereas smaller banks were actually filing adjusted net capital using current market rates. The result was, all those bulge-bracket banks such as Lehman Bros., Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan/Chase etc, achieved a lot more leverage than say, smaller community banks who actually experienced tighter restrictions under Basel 2, which was the original intention of the model. Notice how no community banks needed bailouts?
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill If you look up the official explanation for the financial crisis, you'll see something like "complex financial products and the failure on the part of regulators to reign in on the excesses of Wall Street." That means exactly what I just described. Yes that's true, "cash out" is what I meant by redemption's. You basically have a percentage of equity in the fund, which is really just a bunch of capital the fund manager pools and invests across large, mid, and small cap. stocks.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid Great info truly, cheers for that.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill ETFs are pooled like mutual funds, but offered in shares. With ETF's you can independently trade shares on market exchanges, vs. mutual funds which are controlled by the fund manager, so you'd have to "cash out" by notifying the fund manager and he'll do a withdrawal. Morningstar rates funds, and they're pretty accurate. ETFs are pretty hot right now, investors like the flexibility they offer.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Yeah no problem, so I'm actually about to leave work so I'll get back to you later, I was just curious if you had a specific idea about the population problem, basically what I asked you last night. I completely agree with you about the responsibilities in our culture, it's just a hard topic to talk about. I remember reading something you said about technology, maybe you could expand on that. What do you think about a tax on having more than one baby??
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid That is a hard question for me to answer because I never thought of a tax for more than one child. Don't people get tax breaks in the current system if they have children? The more kids you have, you get more on tax returns? I feel that with technology, the production of cheap & healthy foods and city restructure, we could forget about over population. This however is somewhat of a "pipe dream" to most. I've read that population is not growing as fast as before.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I meant to say irresponsible behavior. I think I would get lynched if I said my tax idea in public lol. It's just a touchy subject, I don't know how to address it, but I see it as a major concern. I personally think commodity and food prices will rise till they discover their relevance vs. consumption, and extract maximum possible returns from consumers. We're also seeing emerging markets raising import quotas. We have to start looking at our resources in a finite manner.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid But I do see your point about a tax, and see why some people would over react. I see if that was implemented, people might make a case that it could violate some human rights whereas one could argue that those funds from the tax could be used to address planetary problems that come with over population. I have also read that the Earth could support potentially tens of billions of people if the technology is there to support as well with ideas I pointed out before.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Okay well I'm out of here. I'll get back to you later on if you respond.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid At the current rate of technology growth, which is about double per year, by the 2030s, one might see nanobots that could be ingested to fight off disease, repair damaged cells, even make us smarter. Have you seen 3d printing? With advancements in nano-carbons, one might be able to create goods in their house without the need to go to a store. This however would not happen in the current system because there would be no scarcity, and profits would go down.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill What I disagree with on is the way they're going about it. They're discrediting themselves. I got tired of "debating" people on here that didn't even know basics, which is why I outlined some basics on my channel. I haven't read any of that gentleman's publishings, but I'm interested. I'm actually interested in hearing your views on the population issue, because I view that as a major concern.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid It does not take facts to prodcue a theory is what I am saying. Lets be clear here,someone can say that a kiebler elf created the moon, which is not based in theory. Everyone knows the moon is a moon, that is the only thing factual about the statement, however, theory is just reasoning, which can be based on facts or non-facts. Of course every theory explains the reasons on certain facts, but the reasoning does not have to be sound in facts..are we on the right page? SEMANTICS
csley66 1 month ago
@csley66 So you admit that it takes facts to construct a theory? The reasoning is based on the correlation between the facts. Your example provides no correlation, You are taking two things that you could not reasonably link together, therefore it is the ramblings of a mad man.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill By the way, I have to get to bed, I get up before 6. I'll get back to your responses at some point tomorrow.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill My points on inflation are not "theory" it's fact. Saying inflation rates increasing 2,500% in Germany in 1923 is the worst case of hyperinflation is a fact. Saying OPEC raised oil prices in the 70s, coupled in with high unemployment rates which resulted in stagflation is a fact. Saying unexpected inflation benefits debtors and hurts creditors is a fact. Everything is a fact.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid it takes facts to construct a theory... it is still a theory
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill thats false, it does not take facts to construct a theory, come on grow up before you start blabbing about stuff.
csley66 1 month ago
@csley66
Theory pronunciation [thee-uh-ree, theer-ee]
-A coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena.
-A proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
-This is from the dictionary, learn words before you start "blabbing" stuff.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@csley66
1: the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
2: abstract thought : speculation
3: the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art (music theory)
Source: Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Need I go on? Learn what the word means before you make a fool of yourself.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@csley66
-Theory (th-r, thîr)
A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena. Most theories that are accepted by scientists have been repeatedly tested by experiments and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
I can do this all night.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@csley66 1. theory - a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural worldtheory - a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a specific set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses"; "true in fact and theory"
Source: Free online thesaurus
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Yeah, they're all separate funds, so you're not obligated to adjust your position on the S&P fund if say, you withdraw from the mutual fund. The S&P 500 is an index fund, a little bit different than a mutual fund. An index fund basically invests proportionately throughout a stock index, in this case the S&P 500 which consists of the top 500 large cap. stocks of U.S. companies. The S&P is a broad based stock index. It's pretty simple, the market capitalization of a stock..
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill The market capitalization of stock is simply the share price by the number of outstanding shares on the market. So if the company employs a buy-back program this will reduce the outstanding shares and the share prices will rise. Those shares will go into the corporate treasury so they're not outstanding. Okay I'm getting off topic, sorry. So the S&P 500 is a broad based index, and it's cap. weighted. This means the larger cap stocks influence the index more.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill So an index fund invests proportionately throughout a stock index. A mutual fund offers a broader diversification structure, mutual funds invest their assets proportionately throughout multiple indices. Hedge funds are extremely diversified and invest throughout many different asset classes. ETF's are exchange traded funds, they're like mutual funds only you're offered shares that you can independently trade on the stock exchange.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill The small cap. fund you mentioned is simply a fund that invests into stocks ranked with small market capitalization. That's a narrow based index, think of it as the exact opposite of the S&P 500.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Yeah, on the W2s you list dependents. I file taxes as single, zero dependents, and I'm pretty happy. My dad was working for a Wall Street bank since before I was born and I never saw him, and I hated that. I know I have no time to focus on my career and a family, I really have no desire for that right now. I'm turning 31 this May and I can't see myself being tied down to one woman. I actually perked up and got some energy when I started reading your mention of nanobots
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I don't know if you read some of my reading selections on my channel, but I've been reading a lot books on Transhumanism in my spare time, and I'm extremely fascinated with it. You probably know this, it's the science of creating machines the size of molecules. I've been reading about nano-tech assembler machines that will be able to build at an atomic level, and replicate any chemically permitted form of matter. They'll be able to create organic tissue and eventually cont
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill And eventually expand a humans lifespan. They also mentioned artificial neuro-chip intelligence. So all together with artificial intelligence and life extension technology, you're basically not human in the conventional sense, but rather entering into a phase of post-humanism. I'm highly intrigued by this and I'd donate money into the research and development of this technology in a heartbeat.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I suggest Ray Kurzweil if you are into transhumanism. He is a leading figure in that school of thought. He talks about all that stuff you mentioned about A.I. integrating with humans. He was the one who predicted a computer who beat the best chess champions in the mid to late 90s, and a lot of his other technology based claims have been quite accurate.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Ohhhh I've heard of him!! I didn't recognize the name. Yeah I'm definitely going to check that out. They ran some tests like that on the financial markets, only in the reverse sense, they put a monkey up against high-tech trading software, the monkey was randomly and instinctively picking trades. The chimp actually won lol. Pretty interesting stuff. Those chess programs are hard to beat. I used to play at this site, and I actually didn't mind when people used them.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid The chimp won? That is crazy, I guess the markets can be pretty tricky even for expensive,high end software!
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Oh you bet my friend. It was definitely a shock. It's a gamble when the markets aren't trading technically. Recently throughout the European debt crisis turmoil which peaked this past quarter, almost all markets were trading on macroeconomic developments. So here we're doing moving averages, ranging, running stochastic, high frequency algorithmic software, and low and behold the only two emotions investors have come into play (fear and greed), and it's a gamble.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I never beat the programs they were using, but I came close once. It was pretty satisfying at the time for me, I like a challenge. I'm definitely going to check out the reference over the weekend. I've also been getting into metaphysics as well. In a nutshell, I believe the best hope for humanity to usher in the New Age is to have economic and spiritual unity, which have been the reasons for war and division throughout recorded time.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I think that the chess champion ended in a stalemate against the computer. Chess can be tricky especially when the computer can think many more moves ahead and different possible outcomes in split seconds.
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill *stochastics...yeah those programs are usually 3 moves ahead of me, I got it down to one move, and I came really close one time. As far as the chimp goes, I wouldn't mind him next to me at the blackjack table. Close second to Rain Man.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I once read this study, chimps were taught the concept of money. First thing the male chimps did was give the money to the females in exchange for sex and the female chimps only mated with the chimps with the most money. Seem familiar?
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Really? lol no wonder why they're good at trading. I guess that's what they mean by monkey business. I did agree with you earlier, my tax scheme would never work, it's too outrageous. I think communist China pulled something like that in the 80s. I'm not really worried so much about supplies, more so about the heightened chance of more turmoil and violence we're seeing escalate, should the population grow at the rate they're forecasting.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
I think humanity is at a pivotal crossroads to an unprecedented extent. I think we have two options right now, the dark path, or the light path. War is not a phenomenon, we know what causes war. I can't even voice my opinion a lot of the time, because people react as if I'm a traitor, or I committed some horrific act. That opinion is basically my desire to eliminate the concept of sovereignty. You may not agree with me but, I don't see the point in imaginary squiggly lines on a map.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill I get cyber-lynched for expressing a disregard of the constitution. I personally feel the constitution being a 200+ year old document was sufficient to address the problems faced in colonial America, and it's definitely part of our history. But I don't think we should look to the constitution as the be all end all of answers to challenges of the 21st century. In my opinion, a feudal state like Iran living in the dark ages and "constitutionalists" have something in common.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid SO BASICALLY WHAT YOUR SAYING IS YOU WANT TO GIVE UP YOUR RIGHTS?
MrWuldntulike2kno 1 month ago
@MrWuldntulike2kno No, that's not what I said at all. I'd want to eliminate individual ruling states/countries and replace it with a new body that represents all. I don't think humanity can make it through another century of wars like we saw in the 20th century, especially with terrorism and nuclear capabilities. The EU is the most progress we've made, unfortunately I'm a rare breed of American that actually sees a positive influence in aligning interests with other nations.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@MrWuldntulike2kno By the way, I hope you know this video is complete nonsense. They interviewed NYPD and emergency personnel that were in building 7, there were no explosions. They explained exactly how they fell. This guy is a fear monger.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid . The biggest reason for the constitution is to protect us from the Federal Government, no matter how old it is we need to be protected and our rights intact, which we are already losing.. Had our gov follow the constitution less people would hate our current globalist controlled government..
Gtrplyr1 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Who is csley66? He's sending me a message and I think he thinks he's talking to you. Looks like he fell asleep in high school lab. Of course you need evidence to form a theory lol. Any of the sciences from economics to particle physics, you gather evidence, formulate a theory, and test it. This guy has no idea what he's talking about lol.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill Sorry but they don't teach Austrian theory in college, it's not mainstream. You'd know that if you actually took macroeconomics. Look, I'm sorry you're wacked
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
Comment removed
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@mxIllKill By the way, nice channel. Why did you fill up four to five lines on occupation when you could've just said unemployed. Yeah you're a particle waive of endless possibilities alright, however I think most of those possibilities evaporated in a cloud of marijuana smoke.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
@WallStwizkid I am employed, I just do not define myself based on who gives me fiat money unlike yourself. Yes I do enjoy cannabis, the proper term unlike your racist, fear mongering term like marijuana. No I am not a particle "waive" as you say (nice grammar) rather a particle WAVE, which you might understand if you study some quantum physics rather than BS Wall St. garbage, the wave particle duality principle, matter and light exhibit the behaviors of both waves and particles
mxIllKill 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mxIllKill I'm sorry you're mentally ill, watching conspiracy theory videos, thinking you're smart. This kid thinks a general description of inflation is a theory because he watches libertarian videos and tries to pose like he knows what he's talking about. Come to lower Manhattan and talk about your libertarian views so we can laugh at you. By the way, there were witnesses to tower 7, also a fact, and if this crap were true, there would most definitely be charges filed. Bye
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
These aren't "facts" Alex. Facts are things you can prove, meaning, you go to a court and you get an indictment filed. Conspiracy theories are theories, crackpot theories mostly, but not facts.
WallStwizkid 1 month ago
Comment removed
mxIllKill 1 month ago
Comment removed
mxIllKill 1 month ago
@Pooternackle5 Finally a voice of reason, both O&A and Alex have time slots to fill and cater to their audience.
Hipcubbiesfan80 2 months ago
all 3 of these guys are crazy idiots
bojanks15 2 months ago
(After listening to the whole interview)..I don't agree with AJ 100% but he definitely held his own against these childish, denial-ridden fools...."I can't accept that" is their response to what AJ has to say? Sorry he had to burst your comfort bubble, but O&A have no clue about the world they live in. God I can't stand those twits!
InfiniteFreeThinkers 3 months ago
@InfiniteFreeThinkers "amen to that" you said it the best
STR8R1D3R 3 months ago
I like O&A but I'm disappointed in this. I HATE 9/11 conspiracies but Alex Jones at least fucking backed his shit up and Anthony defaulted to his usual "Ehhhhhh I jjuuuuusst don't see it happpening, I can't accept blahblahblah" bullshit. Bill Burr said it best, he's a loud guy with a microphone and he's got a nice enough vernacular to convince other idiots into thinking he's smart.
SBV123 3 months ago
Who you need to read about is Edward Bernays.
TiMMYSQUibbLES 5 months ago 6
@TiMMYSQUibbLES true true him too
sciencemunk 4 months ago
@sciencemunk There's actually a really good documentary about Bernays from Adam Curtis called "the century of self" you can find here on YT.
watch?v=IyPzGUsYyKM
TiMMYSQUibbLES 4 months ago
Now this is hillarious. Opie and Anthony and Alex Jones after Bin Laden's death!! Best one ever! /watch?v=xSgDOFl37j8
AroundSun 5 months ago
That retard sounds just like Ant's Nixon impression.
Terbyn 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 kooks like to ignore the fact that there are dozens of LOUD explosions before and during a controlled demolition. none of which were heard on 9/11. I mean LOUD. You should have been able to hear it from Brooklyn. Yet, nothing. No pictures of blastic caps, copper tubing, nothing. You idiots lost ten years ago. Give it up. You morons have NOTHING. No evidence. ZERO.
AroundSun 5 months ago
hahhha "spook"
rocknrollporn 6 months ago
Not in studio, over ISDN.
murcuryvapor 8 months ago in playlist Jim Norton & Opie n Athony
Sinamatics is an oreo cookie and a cum swallower
dude75able 9 months ago
"i believe it was Extremists that hate our freedom" ......lol that sounds so ridiculous honestly.....why would you attack the biggest military in the world just because you dont like my girls booty shorts lol
Sinamatics 10 months ago
@Sinamatics Yeah, who'd believe some crazy muslims would want to bomb America. They LOVE us over there!!!
CoolerKing37 9 months ago
@CoolerKing37 yup they LOVE the fact we bomb their homes and kill their babies lol.......
Sinamatics 9 months ago
@Sinamatics So you admit that the radical muslims have a motive...
CoolerKing37 9 months ago
@CoolerKing37 radical" would you be radical if i walked up in your house and killed everyone in it and you decided to get revenge on me?
Sinamatics 9 months ago
@Sinamatics Probably. Revenge killings don't exactly hold a lot of weight in court. But thank you for acknowledging that they were the ones behind 9/11.
CoolerKing37 9 months ago
@CoolerKing37 um....#1 revenge killings definitely hold up in court...never herd of temporary insanity? #2 i didnt say anything about 9/11 at all nice leap tho lol....you must only read a few words of what i say because youve obviously missed the point EVERYTIME lol
Sinamatics 9 months ago
@Sinamatics So you admit they're insane too? Sounds pretty "radical" to me...
CoolerKing37 9 months ago
@CoolerKing37 just stop dude youre not funny and your ignorance is shining through
Sinamatics 9 months ago
@Sinamatics Don't tell me you're giving up! What kinda conspiracy nut are you? Alex Jones would be ashamed.
CoolerKing37 9 months ago
@CoolerKing37 lol nut,listen stupid every argument ive had is more logical then ANYTHING youve said,but you are stupid so i forgive you haha
Sinamatics 9 months ago
@Sinamatics Yeah, whatever. QUITTER.
CoolerKing37 9 months ago
"I don't believe in blood drinking lizards"
How many times has Alex Jones had David "I believe in blood drinking lizards" Icke on his program?
soulinite 10 months ago
@soulinite by that reasoning Opie and Anthony must definitely believe 9/11 was an inside job......i mean its so obvious they had Alex Jones on they have to believe everything he believes right lol
Sinamatics 10 months ago
By the way, the only way conspiracies exist is one thing-- unanswered questions. Answer the questions, and they wouldn't exist. Furthermore, just because they label something "official" doesn't mean it is, for all you simpletons out there. Use your God given brain a bit more, and think deeper. I am dumbfounded on how much they try to insult my intelligence with "official" stories. See, I think for myself, gather many different sources of info, and make up MY OWN mind.
silverfoote 11 months ago
@silverfoote So tell me, exactly how flat is the Earth?
Sorcoral 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sorcoral You just proved my point. Thank you.
silverfoote 11 months ago
@Sorcoral I was going to let this go, and just let it stand on it's own stupidity, but I just can't. YOU PROVE MY POINT. They FOUND OUT, by answering their own question, and saw the Earth was ROUND--A LONG TIME AGO! It was a conspiracy, and it hasn't been for a long time, because THEY ANSWERED THEIR FUCKING QUESTION !!! I can't believe I even responded to that. Keep on jacking off to your favorited Jessica Alba video, and try to get out of the cold more up there, ey ?
silverfoote 11 months ago
@silverfoote Have you been actually seen Earth from space or are you just believing the "official" story?
Sorcoral 11 months ago
Opie & Anthony are absolute tools. There are a lot of tools in America, and the world for that matter. They appeal to their audience. Simple. If you find them "entertaining" or "funny", more power to you, have a ball. If you listen to that show to learn something, you're simply in the wrong place. All those paid trolls, by the way, should be ashamed of themselves. All of you are absolute sell outs, and aren't making things any better, whatsoever. Godspeed to those who are seeking the truth.
silverfoote 11 months ago
@silverfoote LOL, calling others trolls for not believing in your little x-file sci fi bullshit?
smh, shut up.
KenFan4life 10 months ago
@KenFan4life What the fuck did you just type ? Stay in Jay Z's basement please. Telling me to shut up online, tough guy. Stick to animation ignorant youngster, you have a lot to learn.
silverfoote 10 months ago
8:00 DING DING
skydiver211150 11 months ago
at 4:47 alex said he interviewed 3 types of people who said they heard the countdown to blow up building 7, then he said a reported said there WAS going to be a countdown indicating there was no countdown so he lied about the interviews if he had those interviews he would have told the show where to find them he is a strawman and the videos i made expose him as the fool he is, i destroy alex. check out my videos before you comment so you don't look stupid the way i prove alex to be.
loosechangeexposed 11 months ago
Opie & Anthony's reasoning seldom goes beyond:
...but I never heard of that.
...I can't imagine that.
...I dont believe that.
...people can't keep a secret.
That's their "arguments" always - while Jones can document most of what he says. JFK's head and body clearly are pushed BACKWARDS in the Zapruder film, but people still prefer to believe some "experts from the government" than their own eyes.
These guys don't want to look into conspiracies, so their brains will "PROVE" that there are none.
TheHorsenation 11 months ago 17
@TheHorsenation Entrance/exit wound. He was hit in the back of the head. Don't get me wrong, there's alotta shady circumstances about the JFK assassination but I don't think this is one of them. Numerous ballistics experts have come forth saying a body will sometimes react that way when hit from behind. Sometimes jerk back, sometimes jerk forward, sometimes to the side.
JerFhilm 11 months ago
@JerFhilm
so why did his wife have to climb backwards to collect parts of his brains from the trunk of the car?
It all makes no sense. and actually I think he was shot from both sides, first from behind (but not from the schoolbook building) then from the front, grassy knoll area. Also major forensic and medical experts say he was shot from the front, so what are you talking about, but fooling yourself.
TheHorsenation 11 months ago
@TheHorsenation you should read my newest comment, i prove alex is a liar
loosechangeexposed 11 months ago
@TheHorsenation This is a PRATT argument. Ironically if you actually had done any research you'd know how silly using the "back and to the left" argument makes you look.
ProTip: research isn't uncritically accepting things you watch on the internet.
soulinite 10 months ago
@TheHorsenation What the fuck?
LibertyWaxlips 8 months ago
@TheHorsenation As for the Zapruder film, seeing with my own eyes, it is very possible that the fatal shot came from behind, the bullet entering the back of Kennedy's head and as it exited the front, the force created from the exit wound could and did propel his head backwards. Not saying that there weren't more shooters, but that final shot most likely did come from behind.
ShaoD 7 months ago
@ShaoD "the force from the exit propelled his head backwars"
lol, I dont rule that out completely, but it's just ridiculous. Also, I have seen a forensic analysis by a renowned doctor who also said he was clearly murdered from the front after examining all available evidence. I dont recount his name now, but it's on youtube also somewhere. maybe you know it.
anyway. it looks to me people who defend the official story just are afraid to face the truth, subconsciously.
TheHorsenation 7 months ago
@TheHorsenation Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the official story, I just accept that it's very possible and most liekly that the fatal shot came from where it was claimed. Even a congressional investigation found that it most likely involved more people and a greater conspiracy.
ShaoD 7 months ago
@ShaoD "the force created from the exit wound could and did propel his head backwards"
I thought about this claim again. I don't own a gun, but try shooting some apples, melons or whatever.
I bet they will NEVER be propelled towards the shooter but always away from him.
That's just plain physics. Same should apply to human heads that get shot.
I agree, there were more shooters at various angles.
TheHorsenation 7 months ago
@TheHorsenation You're literally cmparing apples and oranges. Fruit and the human skull have different masses and densities. That's a really good idea though. I;d love to see a mock demonstration with either the head of a cadaver or something similar in mass and density to human skull to see what happens.
ShaoD 7 months ago
Comment removed
TheHorsenation 7 months ago
@ShaoD
the point is, if you shoot through something, there is NOT an explosion happening at the exit hole that could push the thing "backwards". The stuff that flies out of the exit hole is being dragged along by the force of the bullet, literally ripped outwards, which would create a drag on the body (head) it was attached to before, thus move it in the same direction, and not backwards.
TheHorsenation 7 months ago
@TheHorsenation I agree, and the people they claim can't keep a secret exist, they're called whistleblowers.
Hipcubbiesfan80 7 months ago
Comment removed
TheSorrow1O1 6 months ago
@TheHorsenation too bad morons like alex jones have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. You are gullible for buying into his crap!!
AroundSun 5 months ago
@AroundSun
there's quite alot of evidence, including E. Howard Hunt's deathbed confession and written statements about the conspiracy to eliminate Kennedy. Don't be so sure who the gullible one is here.
Oswald was trained by US agencies and set up. on and on. get informed.
TheHorsenation 5 months ago
@TheHorsenation surrreee bud.... they wanted oswald out of ALL THE PEOPLE ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH to be a scapegoat. vince bugliosi proved you idiots wrong. go watch another episode of jesse venturas show. learn the difference between TRUTH FACTS AND EVIDENCE vs. entertainment and the ability to persuade naive gullible masses into thinking that they are now "in the know".
you morons crack me up
AroundSun 5 months ago
@AroundSun
the "logic" in your Oswald argument escapes me somehow.
While I respect Bugliosi for various reasons his book and his opinion about Oswald is nothing short but a joke and totally disinformed. He even said there's no connection whatsoever of Oswald to any of these groups (like CIA) - which is plain wrong.
I would love to see Jim Marrs debate him on the topic. Maybe we can have it one day if Vince doesn't chicken out.
You called me moron several times unprovoked, kinda immature imho.
TheHorsenation 5 months ago
@TheHorsenation There is no connection. What do you have??? Where is it?! And not some prisonplanet website. I don't think vince is afraid to battle. I only said that because you think nobody on the O&A show has looked into this garbage over the past ten years. THEY HAVE, and they have dismissed it as they should have. The best one is Opie Anthony Bin Laden where Alex says he has been frozen on ice. /watch?v=xSgDOFl37j8
AroundSun 5 months ago
@TheHorsenation Jim Marrs? The guy who wrote 'Alien Agenda' and thinks that alien abductions are real, and that crop circles are made by aliens from other planets, and that the moon is an alien space ship? So since Jim Marrs was quoted , does that now mean that aliens are behind the September 11 attacks too? Vince is a prosecutor who goes off of facts and evidence. I am sure he would not only debate that nut, but DESTROY HIM on every level
AroundSun 5 months ago
@AroundSun
hey, Jim Marrs got to make some money too :)
People are paying for Alien books after all .
Anyway writing about Aliens is legitimate, even if it's quite impossible to proof anything.
You don't need to ridicule 9/11 with Aliens or Antisemitism now, that's called a Strawman argument.
There is stuff to look into , like the deathbed confession of E. Howard Hunt, documents that claim Oswald was trained by Naval Intelligence, Bush senior reported a hitman, forensics claim frontshot...
TheHorsenation 5 months ago
also the funny defection of Oswald to the Soviets would support that he was on the CIA payroll and was being groomed for some job and kept on standby. He grew bored in Russia and returned to the US then and shot Kennedy? kinda weird thing to do.
TheHorsenation 5 months ago
looks more like Oswald was set up to be an "evil Communist" to further increase the publics hate against him.
TheHorsenation 5 months ago
@TheHorsenation The confession doesn't mean anything though. First of all it is obvious here say because he is dead. The man could have just been babbling for fame. It could be a complete lie. Oswald was a qualified sharpshooter, that's no secret. I just don't see a debate between Vince and jim Marrs happening. And I can't really find the man credible on the subject..But hey...who cares
AroundSun 5 months ago
@TheHorsenation His head lulled. Another film clearly shows parts of his brains spraying FORWARD.
iamthegreatest2006 3 months ago
@iamthegreatest2006
still living in denial? your own CIA killed the guy, putting your head in the sand wont help you.
TheHorsenation 3 months ago
@TheHorsenation You theorists are the ones "in denial". You want to believe your theories so bad that you will overlook logic. If you watch every different angle from that day, you will clearly see that
A: The exit spray leaving the front of his head.
B: No one on "The Grassy Knoll"
C: You actually see Oswald in the window.
All these films were recently made HD (or as HD as possible for an 8mm roll) and show just how wrong all of these conspiracies are.
iamthegreatest2006 3 months ago
Also, they aren't 'my own CIA'. I'm Irish.
iamthegreatest2006 3 months ago
@TheHorsenation really? so who was the other shooter who perfectly shot at the same time as oswalt?
bojanks15 2 months ago 2
Alex Jones don't argue his beliefs, he just recites them in a louder tone
mattd687 1 year ago
Face it, he's? making money off of conspiracy-believing fanatics. You're like one of those people who turn on those infomercials in the middle of the night and believe it because they say they'll give you something for free, despite the fact that their claims (like Alex Jone's) are laughably preposterous. Typical scam tatctics. In the long run, Alex Jones is making money off his ability to capture the imaginations of gullible conspiracy-believing idiots.
AroundSun 1 year ago
Alex Jones is a goddamn parody of himself. Every time he uses the word pogrom instead of program I want to spit on my monitor.
JaeEffingKae 1 year ago
opie &anthony wake up dumb ass.
oyindw 1 year ago
I have to go with anthony on this
shinebox666 1 year ago
Even IF, Alex was making all this up (which he's not), he sure has quite the imagination. XD
xXxRequiem 1 year ago
why demo blg 7?
Bnasty101 1 year ago
Alex Jones Owned These 3 Dumbshits