Added: 10 months ago
From: FoxNewsInsider
Views: 37,075
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (437)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Under the NDAA people will soon be debating issues like this from Gitmo with a sack over their head. Only Ron Paul will even publically address that un-Constitutional, high-step towards tyranny.

    Ron Paul 2012 for Peace, Liberty, and to repeal the NDAA!

  • Applause incoming -> Fox goes for the outro.

    Fuck these news networks, RT is the last neutral and realistic one.

  • What he means is he's Libertarian at the federal level and Theocratic at the state level. His rhetoric about human rights doesn't impress me. People are singled out, grouped together, and discriminated against regularly in this country for their differences and Paul ignores that.

    Fuck Ron Paul.

  • @OnlyARide He has bigger stuff to worry about, as in saving LIVES.

    Fuck You.

  • RON PAUL 2012 !!!!!!

  • @da006 Messed up on my wording but I'm sure you understand the point I'm attempting to get across.

  • ...Those government regulations haven't always been around, and this country doesn't have a history of ever having the problem of people being denied medical attention, specifically in the ER. Man is imperfect. Accidents happen. Whenever government regulations got involved all hell broke loose.

  • @da006 That is my point exactly. A libertarian government has never been given a chance so who are you to say it wouldn't work. What saddens me is that closed-minded people, which is how you're coming off to me, a type of government that differs from the others will never be given that chance. I'm against medicaid and federally funded health care...

  • @da006 Also, if you're passionate about something, as Ron Paul seems to be about constitutionalism, would you just give up after not winning? I seriously doubt Ron Paul is running for his own economical growth.

  • @da006 If you would be so kind to provide evidence backing your opinion, not fact, stating that a libertarian government can't solve real world problems. Since you seem to have factual insight regarding the reason these "real" world issues seem to go unsolved, please, enlighten us.

  • @BreatheForYourDreams That's like saying, prove God doesn't exist. As far as I know, there are no libertarian governments, so first you'd have to prove that a libertarian government would work to back up your claims. In any event, I'm sure you'll admit there's going to be wide-spread poverty without Welfare and Social Security... and people dying in the streets without medicaid or federally funded health care. Libertarians think that the the free market will magically balance everything out.

  • @BreatheForYourDreams Also, Libertarians believe in merit but there's really no level playing field. There are social and financial disadvantages that we're all subject to. Do you honestly believe that African-Americans have the same opportunities as Whites? And that it's all about merit? Please. Libertarianism is just a little bit too idealistic. In an ideal world, yes, Libertarianism sounds great. In reality, it's not the best to secure the most prosperity for the most people.

  • I want to favorite this but i dont want to make it look like i support Faux news presstitutes...

  • what a beautiful statement

  • Why are there so many Ron Paul supporters? Goes to show you how little everyone knows about politics. Marriage is one of the very few issues that I agree with him on. But if you eliminate every government agency except the police force, you're opening the door to poverty and chaos.

  • @da006 Your views are way off. For one small government is not NO government. The constitution spells out the duties of the federal government. The rest is supposed to be up to the states. Maybe you should go read the constitution, then come back and comment again. :)

  • @fognog3 Yea, because the Constitution has all the answers. If you follow the Constitution, our country will be prosperous no matter what... I'm sure our founders back in the 1700's knew how to run a modern democracy. You sound like a religious man.

  • @da006 that shows how little you know. We are not a democracy we are a republic. If you don't like the constitution why don't you leave :P

  • @fognog3 You're dumb. Our government is a republic but is known as the world's largest democracy. If I don't like the Constitution then leave? You mean, Americans aren't entitled to their opinion? Apparently, you have no idea what the Constitution stands for. Under your logic (agree or leave), you think America is a fascist regime. Whoever doesn't agree with you or the Constitution should leave. Mindless clone.

  • @da006 Known to be the worlds largest democracy when we are not a democracy? You are not making sense. And I didn't say get out or I will shoot you I said if you don't like it here then leave. Simple as that.

  • @fognog3 You must not be educated. Maybe you should go to college or study politics. We are a representative democracy. By popular usage, the word "democracy" has come to mean a form of government in which the government derives its power from the people and is accountable to them. Thus, the United States might accurately be called a democracy. But yes, we are also a form of republic; back in Rome leaders were elected by the elite... today the common people elect leaders.

  • @da006 representative democracy? No we are a republic. Sorry

  • @fognog3 Also, I don't have to do shit because you're in no position to give me conditions. You're just an uneducated shit-head typing behind a computer saying stupid shit. I'm entitled to an opinion... it's called freedom. Why don't you try reading the Constitution you fucktard.

  • @da006 Who said you aren't entitled to your opinion? Why are you putting words in my mouth? Uneducated? You are the one that said the United States was a democracy. :) Keep trying though!

  • @fognog3 Are you even from the US? If you are, you must be from the South.

  • @da006 I'm not a treasonous socialist so I must be from the south. Great logic. Nothing is more American than the constitution buddy.

  • @fognog3 You mean, people who don't think the Constitution has all the answers are treasonous socialists? Wow, you must the dumbest retard in your special ed class. Hey, if you ever need to improve corporate and business practices or the banking system, good luck finding the answer in the Constitution. If you don't think your answer is there, you're treasonous socialist. I guess you can tell my unit commander I'm a treasonous socialist.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @da006 Fognog is right, the constitution is a federal government restricter, and people dont know that most of teh things that the feds are mixed up in are not there place to be apart of, its up the individual states to decide things like legalizing gay marrage. He doesnt believe in no government, he just believes in less government

  • @SlyTheBlindGuy Well, I'm sure the Constitution has all the answers, just like the bible. So what do you suppose will happen when we take away social security, and government taxes to help build roads, etc. Do you think they're magically going to take care of themselves? Ron Paul is a libertarian, and libertarians are idealists. There's just no way that that form of government can solve real world problems.

  • @da006 hate to tell you but road repairs don't come from your income tax. They come from gas taxes and property taxes etc. The income tax barely pays the interest on the national debt.

  • @da006 I'm talking about Libertarians here, which is what Ron Paul is, until he sold out so that he can get closer to obtaining the office of President... or maybe he just wants more campaign contributions every time he runs to fill his pockets. The man knows he can't win, but he runs every 4 years... what a douche. And all of you Ron Paul supporters are eating that shit up like it's crack.

  • President Paul 2012!!

  • He is the epitome of a true Christian AND a Constitutionalist combined, which is living your life the way you think best, but not imposing your way of life on others, while they don't impose theirs on you. Ron Paul 2012. He really is my only hope for this unrecognizable place we call "America".

  • Quit trying to be something your not. This is to all the homophobic people who just are field with hate. Our world not country is suppose to be about love and happiness. Hates dwells in all of us to some degree. I personally have learned that if you take care of your own life honestly then by hating another group based on something you know nothing about is just hatred. Take care of you and your family. and quit judging you inperfect person such as myself.

  • @daeGamer Why only two adults? Why should someone be forced to marry only one individual? Why should you care?

  • I still don't know why such a wonderful nation can not allow gay marriage or at least just equal rights for same sex unions. It really doesn't negatively affect a thing, it's mostly positive as a whole really. It'd probably create jobs and create a lot of revenue due to people getting married.

  • If Ron Paul is the Republican ticket... This gay liberal might just have to vote Republican

  • So he's against it?

  • @Patriik23 Troll?

  • Ron Paul is awesome!

  • Fuck gay rights, fuck immigrant rights, fuck whatever rights you want.. We should simply have human rights; we're all living under the same godless sky.

  • When will people understand, people getting married is not for the sole purpose of procreation and offers legal privileges and protections, nor does barring gays and lesbians from it increase procreation rates. Gays and lesbians aren't going to turn straight by forcing them to live as second class citizens, all it's going to do is cause costly issues that frankly the country has no business in. The pursuit of happiness means people can do what they want, fuck all. Support full LGBT equality!

  • Ron Paul is a beast!

  • He doesn't nessessary support gay marraige, though he opposed DOMA back in 1996, so I support him for being against traditional values in state (aka violation of 1st amendment)

  • Ron Paul is absolutely WRONG. You don't get the government "out" of it. The government is instituted to "defend/secure" rights. And life/health is a "right". The government can not "defend" marriage, which is the natural institution of the natural procreation of life unless it is involved in regulating it. Duh....mcfly.....

  • @ElCangri137 Wow you say that as it was obvious. Well let me tell you that it's OBVIOUS that you're fucking wrong. Marriage is not the "natural institution" smart guy, it was first religious, then it became cultural. You can't define what is natural for mankind and what is not, unless you're another illuminated ignorant fanatic that cannot understand that people don't necesseraly share the same beliefs. Duh...mcfly...

  • WHY DOES IT MATTER IF GAY MARRIAGE IS LEGAL? GAY MARRIAGES DOES NOTHING TO AFFECT THIS COUNTRY ITS FREEDOM OF CHOICE IF YOU WANT TO GET MARRIED YOU SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO THIS COUNTRY IS FOUNDED AND RUN BY TYRANTS

  • @daeGamer What about relatives? Should a brother and sister be able to get married? What about a father and daughter or mother and son? What about polygamists? Why should they be forced to marry only one spouse when it "does not affect this country and it's freedom of choice"?

  • @justiceiscoming It is freedom of choice. There is no difference between marriage and gay marriage, marriage is bonding 2 people that love each other. And it has NOTHING to do with this economy, this country, or anything political. NOTHING at all. Let me tell you this, a family can marry each other i dont give a shit, we wouldnt have even known, it wouldnt have bothered us. There could be hundreds of family members getting married to each other, and no result come of it. states should decide

  • This guy sounds too good to be true. Like Obama did.

  • I like how he avoids a true answer by deflecting, as he does constantly, "give the power to the states" Quit trying to divide the UNITED states Paul.

  • @auroradamien It isn't about "dividing," it's about preventing an out-of-control central government from dictating to the states. We are only united by a Constitution that we share...Obama, the federal government, and the Supreme Court attack it on a daily basis. Understand the concept of a united "states" better...it is to protect you.

  • @dedbusted It is about division. Look a little deeper, quit judging things by their cover. Giving states the power to do what they want will lead to civil. It will be east/west Germany times 50.

  • @auroradamien An all-powerful central government that thinks it can control everyone is what would be the cause of a civil war. Some wars are fought for good reasons. (And your East/West Germany analogy is fallacious.) The problem is that the government slowly grows over time so that people cannot catch on--people slowly become conditioned and accept the power Washington has over their lives.

  • Holy crap! Someone with some common sense, finally! :D

  • lol, look at anti-gay Rick Santorum. 00:45

    It looks like he's having a stroke. :)

  • End the phobocracy

  • HAHA cut out the mad clapping and hollering that ensued

  • I have a feeling we are on a vast change in not only this country but society...I'm starting to believe Ron Paul is going to win. The mayans said that 2012 would be an end of an era and a new peaceful beginning. I'm starting to see it in alot of people.

  • I'm fine with this as long as government marriage benefits are not restricted to one type of marriage or another. The military for example, does not grant marriage benefits to homosexual servicemen/women, even if they are legally married in a state that allows it. This type of behavior from the government needs to be addressed.

  • I'm voting for Ron Paul if he wins the primary, but I still have one question if anyone could answer it. I don't understand how it would be possible for marriage laws to operate on a state level. If a gay couple marries in a state where it is allowed and then moves to a state where gay marriage isn't legal, does that mean that they just aren't married anymore? It doesn't seem right to me.

  • @meeep007 The top post atm explains it fairly well, essentially he is proposing that their be a seperation between the legal and religious factors of marriage. Legally, anybody should be able to register a civil union, or something along those lines, and receive the same legal benefits as anybody else from it, regardless of sex. Basically, take marriage out of the federal vocabulary and replace it with some type of civil union, and let the ceremonial part of marriage be handled by church/state.

  • @meeep007 It should also be noted that while that's what he meant, and I tend to agree with it, it's hard for me to imagine that he would be able to pass anything of that nature through the congress and senate at this time.

  • Ron Paul is our greatest chance at salvation. fox news does not want to see Ron Paul succeed. do not like this video cause they will use the profits from it to support 'their' candidates. Go to Ron pauls website or make donations to his campaign. avoid anything that has fox news written on it.

  • FOX NEWS CUT OUT THE APPLAUSE....wow, how biased. Fox news...I prophecy over your station that your corruption will be exposed and you will repent and change your wicked ways. In Jesus name. Amen.

  • i'm starting to like him more every day i think.

  • there looking at it all wrong. He's saying that gays can't get married because its a christian ceremony between a man and a woman and that is the actual definition of it. I'm sure if gays wanted to get together and call it something else like get down on one knee and ask "Will you Raggle Fraggle me."

  • EVERYONE is waking up to Dr. Paul's message of Liberty and Freedom. Our country was founded for Liberty and Freedom. Dr. Paul does not see groups of people. He sees individuals. We need more people like that.

  • I hope every gay and lesbian in the nation votes for Ron Paul.

  • @givemearandomnamenow if this happens then he wins surely haha

  • @givemearandomnamenow they won't, especially with all the newsletters shit going around in leftist circles. They are thoroughly convinced he's a white bigot. lol

  • My favourite part of this was when he said, "...seeing that I've been married for 53, 54 years now." So, which is it? 53, or 54? xD

  • @ArizonaByThe27 No its 5354 years! XD

  • @stinnetbennet Ur A Cocksucker faggot. no cares.

  • Between the applause being cut out and the buzzers & bells ringing to cut Ron Paul short... I'm starting to get a bit pissed. Getting tired of it. If Ron Paul doesn't get a fair shake in this election I'm moving myself & my family out of this country.

  • lol @ Fox News. I watched this debate and you conveniently edited this clip at the precise moment the audience erupted in applause. Fox News stating they are "fair and balanced" is equivalent to water stating it's not wet. This coming from a Republican.

  • I'm a catholic and am sick of seeing all this crap about people saying gay marriage should be Illegal. WHO CARES? If it doesn't affect you, stay out of it! Let people do what they want. This is a free country, and we should all be free to choose our own religion and who we want to marry. And to all you holy rollers, quit quoting scripture. The Bible doesn't preach about trolling around and forcing your religion to people. It's main message is treat others the way you want to be treated.

  • thats good Fox, cut the clip before the audience applaud. Also, fuck you.

  • It's funny how Fox News just cut the clip to commercials, right as the crowd was to applaud him.

    I hate Fox News.... fkin propagandamachine.

    I'm not an American, but I believe in Ron Paul! - Go Ron Paul!

  • i like that fox news cut out all the applause at the end of that statement. fuck fox news.

  • I'm starting to warm to Ron Paul (I'm British so I guess that doesn't really matter). He seems better than Obama that's for sure.

  • So he is ok with gay marriage?

  • .Doma that is Doma. It is the law. Obama won't defend it cause defending the Law is unnesisary. Gays can say they are married. Biolocial Law trumps everything. Mr. + Mr. equals death to america. No more gayness. Marriage is not equality it is responsiblity for taking care of your wife and kids.

  • Ron Paul is absolutely right. I think marriage needs to be taken in two separate terms: the legal and the religious. Legally, everyone should be able to register jointly that they are in a civil union (this would cover tax returns, adoptions, health insurance coverage, etc.). On the religious side, let the churches perform the ceremony of "marriage" and practice according their own beliefs. Doesn't that just make sense? Government has no right or need to determine the "sanctity" of anything

  • @averdegem1 But marriage does not even have to happen in a church, so how is it a religious thing? In fact now that I think of it, there is not even one good argument to support it being a religious ceremony, especially in its secular historical background. Then, there's the issue of christian gays who are being denied a right despite belonging to the community. Once you throw out the sanctity of marriage in the wingnuts' faces, we can start progressin'.

  • @averdegem1 I believe marriage shouldn't be limited to churches personally, it's a ceremony that pre-dates any major religions, however for the most part I agree with you. The government has no right to tell people how to practice their religion provided it's in a respectful manner, nor do they have the right to tell people how to live their lives, especially based on their own beliefs.

  • @YouAreThePeaceSign While the major monotheistic religions were invented after marriage it is understood that marriage came about through religion. Pagan groups still perform "marriage" rituals and the sexes of the couples are unimportant, some more progressive Jewish synagogues and Christian churches will also be happy to marry gay couples.

    Having said that, I think marriage should be left for the churches/religions, make civil unions, regardless of sex, the only legally recognised option.

  • And yes, I'm gay. No I don't live in the US, I live in Australia.

  • @averdegem1 Totally right.

  • Comment removed

  • @averdegem1 Interesting point. My only question is, what about atheists who get married at courthouses?

  • I am a Christian and this is my opinion- what is marraige now a days? the "straight christians jews muslims" have disrespected the sanctity of marraige long before gays have asked for premission. you dont need premission. anyone can be ordained now adays , you can have a cerimony at a wedding hall. its not for us to say they can buy a house and live together and theres not a dam thing antyone can do about it so whats the diff....DONT JUDGE LEST YE BE....PRAY AND LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOU LOVE U

  • awesome!!

    

  • @RW00632 well thanks. It alway interesting to see how people view the government different i like hearing other peoples ideas:) its cool talking to someone who listens to my side gives his own and supports his facts. Other than Ron Paul sucks bc he's crazy lol.

  • SC for Ron Paul!

  • are they debating on a spaceship?

  • @RW00632 lol well i just blame america in general. it welcomed the world with wide open arms and made it easy to get it..that that people from all around the world want the american dream its hard now to close its arms. lol btw than for not saying mexicans being the immigrants :) bc its not just them and i hate it when people blame them haha

  • @RW00632 Plus you took me out of context with the whole "hating gods" thing.

  • @RW00632 Being would have given people the intelligence to use capitals and full stops.

  • @RW00632 Where the fuck did I say I hate gods? I just said 'I'm an atheist.' That may imply that I hate gods, but atheism is the lack of belief in gods. I can't hate something I don't believe is real. If I did I wouldn't follow him because he seems like a bit of a hypocritical cunt, saying "Do not kill" when he wiped out the whole of the human race.

    I may be taking that out of context in some versions of the bible, not all.

    And again, grammar, seriously, you would have thought this omipotent

  • Comment removed

  • @RW00632 Well quoting 1984..which actually is a really good book you said check it out haha but anyways. In the book, the government is corrupted and the people out number the government and can easily take it over (just like in our case) But, they government keeps them ignorant. And the quote is "Ignorance is Strength" and by keeping the people ignorant, the government will be powerful.

  • @RW00632 his policy has nothing to do with trade but with war. Why do we need to be in the middle east? We have no reason to. Some say 9/11...but, do we know what country actually attacked us? No we don't.

  • @RW00632 Also, Ron Paul is the only Candidate that supports Gay Rights, and freedom in general.

  • @RW00632 GW's...fight other countries for no reason? Or Ron Paul's....fight only if it threaten our nations security? And the evidence of the bail outs? Just type in CEO bailout bonuses and you'll find a bunch of evidence on that.

  • @RW00632 Well blame wall street and their 1%. Our government is still corrupted from GWB. the reason why most people are pissed is because the big business men who needed the bail outs because they spent too much money on their mansion got them. And instead of making new jobs and paying their debts, they signed a nice big check for themselves (47% of the bail out money) and screw everyone else. The reason I like ron paul is for his foreign policy and taking power of of the fed gov.

  • @RW00632 what are you talking about. Obama kept us stable and didn't allow things to get worse then they are. It's George W. Bush he screwed us over and now will take a long time to fix what he caused.

  • Perfect!

  • Obviously I totally agree gays should be allowed the same rights as straight people. But what that means is having equal recognition by the state!!! Because come rights are conferred on people by recognition of their marriage by the state. And that is WHY gay people need gay marriage to be recognised by the state. Whether it's called marriage or not? Well it should be called whatever the state calls it for straight people.

  • @cmmndrblu The point is that the state shouldn't be "recognizing" ANY marriage...gay, straight, or whatever. The government does not need to be involved. Period.

  • Uhhhh, So whats your answer?

  • @enemay Marriage is defined as man and woman so gays are dumb to call themselves married but it's a freedom of speech issue so they can call themselves whatever they please, and associate with whom and in what way they please by private contract or religious ceremony. You don't get government involved conservatives get to still say gays are the devil, and liberals can smell their farts how progressive they are. Everyone's happy.

  • What the fuck? I understand he doesn't think the government should address it as a problem or whatever but if opposite sex marriage is recognized by the government and same sex marriage isn't, there's a problem. It doesn't matter WHO he thinks should handle this problem... He barely answered the question as always.

    Seriously, it seems it's mostly white heterosexual cis males that promote this guy.

  • @DirtyOlStankBitch lolz fail I'm gay and I'm voting for Ron Paul because we need him to fix our economy and end the wars. In my state the constitution prohibits gay marriage, but the state right next to mine might just legalize it. I'll just move out of the dump that the previous establishment government put me in now.

  • We need Ron Paul. All the past presidents have been running the government the same way for too long. Change is good, VOTE for Ron Paul!

  • Jesus hates religious zealots. Stay out of my marriage you Christian hypocrites.

  • a true conservative, downsizing government.

  • "Seeing that I've been married for 53, 54 years now."

    I wonder how hard it was for the director to not cut to a shot of Gingrich.

  • So if marriage should be a state matter, does that mean that if Alabama decided to only let whites marry and place a ban on interracial marriage then he would be fine with that and have no reservations? Government needs to be involved because it has involved itself from the beginning. Whether you like it or not there are federal marriage benefits that straight people enjoy that LGBTs cannot if it is left up to the state alone. Are people not listening to what he's actually saying or what?

  • @GovernmentH00ker Do honestly believe that a state in today's times would allow that? If elected officials in Alabama do make a law like that and the citizens agree with it then that's their deal. The minority that doesn't agree would atleast have the option to get married in another state. Lets have some common sense though, alright? That would never happen and we both know it. The beauty of federalism is that laws match your areas specific beliefs and values.

  • RON PAUL 2012

  • Why is this even an issue? Some people accuse homosexuals of a moral crime...they say it's a choice and has nothing to do with biology and genealogy. Now what about me? I'm 100% heterosexual. If someone asks me why I'm straight, I'd say "I don't know....I guess I was born that way", NO ONE would say otherwise. There's a double standard that shouldn't exist if this issue is viewed from a logical standpoint. WHY ARE AMERICANS SO ILLOGICAL!?

  • NO.

    Ron Paul does not support marriage equality.

    He's been OK with the government being in HIS marriage for 50 years, but he doesn't want gay couples to have the same rights.

    He wants the states to decide, which is NOT good for gay couples in his home state of Texas, for example.

  • Fuck the gays, straight people show then respect, but they are always have fuckin cock fights when anyone disagrees slightly with them. Kill the gays!

  • @UltimateTROLLbro Is this an example of the respect that you're referring to? If I were gay I know that I'd just love having people suggest mass genocide of everyone who shares my sexual orientation. Honestly, go die in a hole. Scum like you are a disgrace to humanity.

  • @VTFreestyle224 Well your not gay so why are you getting upset about ssomething aimed at gay you stupid cunt, the way you wrote that pointless come back i guess you should be gay because no girl is gonna wanna live with a gay cunt like you

  • @UltimateTROLLbro I'm sorry, but using that same logic then I shouldn't care about the holocaust because I'm not jewish. I'm allowed to stick up for freedom and people's rights even if the issues aren't directly relevant to me.

  • if a gay person wants to get married then what the fuck is the problem? who is it affecting?

  • @boltjet135 you are dumb. it is wrong to be gay.

  • @moralsareright ok then, what makes it wrong? is it because jesus said so?

  • I love his decision.... country full of too many idiots

  • RON PAUL IS IT.

    gay marriage should not even be addressed as a problem.

    fuck what the government says. if your'e gay, go get married if you like, i'm all for it.

  • @houndsofconventional That would be nice if it were legal. Will you work to repeal DOMA and achieve marriage equality in the remaining 44 states that currently don't allow it?

  • @KevinMossVT i'd sign a petition for it.

  • putting "christian views aside"...let gays marry and pay the taxes and such for said decision. Let them have their hey-day, and NOT let them parade around saying "I told you so" (but most likely the obnoxious ones will)...just as Rick Perry was obnoxious about his stand on this issue. I am sick and tired of people bashing those who stand up for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness

  • This is the only acceptable viewpoint. Rick Santorum could learn a thing or two!

  • RON PAUL let's bring back the true values taken off by this corupted system MEDIA TV...Down those twisted minds thinking just in abnormal pervert sex - sacrilegious abomination of normal "marriage"(man+woman=children=­family)

  • I just feel like if you don't like gay marriage then don't marry a gay person. If gay people have to pay the same amount of taxes as everyone else then they should have the same rights. I'm not sure what constitution everyone else is reading but mine says ALL men are created equal. This is a country of many religions, why should EVERYONE to forced to abide by Christian rules?

  • @DavieyG24 Because being gay is wrong. man+woman=marriage! Also, Jesus Christ will never support homosexual's.

  • @moralsareright That's bullshit. Jesus said "Love God and your neighbour as yourself."

    That's a teaching about equality. He didn't say "love god and your neighbour except homosexuals."

    I'm an athiest, so I wouldn't know first hand, but most Christians say to me "you should ignore the old testament, it's just a load of stories" and I believe only in the old testament (if it even does there) does it go against homosexual marriage.

    Also, it's homosexuals not homosexual's it's not possessive.

    

  • @EnterSyed no it says in the new testament that marriage is between a man and woman. also in matthew 5 17-21 it really clearly shows jesus supporting all of the old testament. without the old testament, jesus makes no sense. please study it before you claim some fancy knowings.

  • @GotmyplaceinHell Problem is that the Old testament holds some very immoral teachings! It condones the stoning of misbehaved children on the same page it condemns homosexuality! So one is clearly wrong but the other is perfectly right?

  • @EnterSyed You're talking to the wrong Christians. Homosexuality is condemned all through the Bible. Romans 1:18-32 for example. We can love someone and still condemn their practices. If a child steals something from a store, a parent still loves them, but they will also punish the child. The parent will even try to correct the behavior.