Please clear me, if a batsman is out then the ball will be declared dead automatically and another batsman cannot be out in a deal ball. Am I missing here something?
@newbedfordsox In the first place the keeper was holding onto the ball, trying to work out who they could run out. One of the batters may have been scoring lots of runs so they wanted to get him. So he threw it to the other end to get him out, but to make sure they'd at least get one wicket, they threw it back to the keeper. So they ran both ends out but only the first wicket counts and it's dead after that.
@newbedfordsox Yes, you are correct, however the decision of 'out' was not given because the umpire wished to use the video review, therefore the ball was still 'live' for them to attempt the second runout - once it was confirmed by the third umpire that it was out, then anything subsequent to that is redundant because the ball is then classed as dead. It's just that in TV cricket the umpire doesn't need to give an instant decision, so play can continue, then later they go back and review.
Now hold on wheres this double run out? I can not see the wicket keeper actually hit the bails or stumps he goes for it then stops and throws it at the bowler?
Kumar wanted the better batsmen out so he threw it to murali who took of the stumpsbut was not sure if the guy was out or not so he threw it back to the other end just to make sure they get atleast one wicket,
yes the ball is not dead after it hits the stumps but is dead after one guy gets out.
@freestyldiver nah mate there are never double plays in cricket. the first batsman up the other end was the one to be dismissed. but they were not sure if they got him out so they tried at the other end. at the end of that play only one batsman can be out not two.
It's simple, the wicket keeper throw the ball back to the bowler to try and go for the better batsman's wicket, but he wasn't sure if he was actually out, so just to make sure they actually got a wicket out of it, he threw the ball back to the wicketkeeper to break the stumps on that side, where the batsman was clearly a long way off.
@geniusgugu i want know what is your country ?respect the other country people because they r also human beings .don't u mother ,teacher, at least your country teach basic manners .shame full country
@bloggulator Actually, that's not true - if the batsman is not out, the ball is still live so had the first batsman made his ground the second would still have been out.
@sugarydonkey No, I'm afraid you're mistaken, breaking the wicket does not render the ball dead under Law 23 - that is why, for example, if the fielder throws the ball at the stumps and hits but the batsman is safe and the balls ricochets to the boundary, it's a 4, and also if the fielding side attempt a run out and hit the stumps but the batsman is safe then they attempt another run, they can still be run out (even at the same end).
By the way, I'm not a 'dumb fuck'. I'm a cricket umpire.
@indiansnipper Firstly, I don't blog every day and night - in fact, I don't blog at all. Secondly, since Law 23 is titled 'Dead Ball', I think I was justified in citing it - for the record, there is no law regarding the long stop and nor can I see any reason why there would need to be.
And yes, I could google the information online. But I'd rather learn it.
I don't get you. Do you mean that if the batsmen are safe and not attempting another run and yet the fielder hits the stump and the ball reaches the boundary, it's a four?
@whotube88 Yes - it's a four plus whatever runs the batsmen had completed before the throw, plus the one they are on if they have crossed - in fact, it's happened before in the Ashes:
@whotube88 Yes - it's a four plus whatever runs the batsmen had completed before the throw, plus the one they are on if they have crossed - in fact, it's happened before in the Ashes - search 'seven runs one ball' on Youtube.
@villafan001 It worries me that a cricket umpire doesn't know that as soon as a player is out, the ball is dead. It is not possible *at all* to get two players out from one delivery. What's happening in this video is that they're breaking both ends to guarantee that they get one of them out.
Law 23.1(a)(iii) says the ball becomes dead as soon as a batsman is dismissed. Therefore it is not possible for both batsmen to be dimissed off the same ball. It has nothing to do with breaking the wicket.
@yottskry12 If you'd taken the time to actually read the thread that my latest comment was part of you would appreciate that I was perfectly aware of that - the point I was making is that assuming the batsman is NOT OUT, the ball is still live to attempt the second run out, contrary to someone who suggested the ball was dead after the first run out attempt.
@sugarydonkey .. are u serious mate... so if the bails are broken i can keep running all day? or only be run out at one end? once the bails are broken at one end according to your 'own personal rule book" then ill just put both batsmen in thecrease at one end and the batsmen can take turns running to the end where the bails are broken and noone will get out....lol u idiot.. ofcourse they can still be run out... mate uve called another person a dumb fuck and u dont even know the rules... FAIL!!!!
@Mopstylz shut up your making a dick of yourself. If the bails are broken and for what ever reason the batters are still running to take the wicket u must hold the ball against a stump and remove the stump from the ground.. If the batter is not in his crease its out. Must we explain to you what a ball is or stumps?
@Stagtatstic haha ur the idiot mate... lol i was being sarcastic.. and im actually a cricket umpire smart ass... u clearly didnt read wat i was replying at... go back and read it then read wat i said.. and then u can feel like a dick! . absolute w*nker!
@Mopstylz why are there so many proud cricket umpires here? you must pull all the ladies with that number and of course your sarcastic sense of humour!
@Stagtatstic .. i see how u read it and u were taking it that i was asking the question as if i didnt know.. i was asking him the question sarcastically... read wat he said and ull understand...
@Stagtatstic Or, of course, you could remake the wicket by replacing the bails and/or putting the stumps back into the ground and then break it again - and I would forward that the reason that there are 'so many' (I counted 2) cricket umpires commenting on this video is that it's a cricket video - strange coincidence really.
The non-striker might be signalled to be out, while the ball is in flight, but if its then caught, the striker is out, and the non-striker survives.
The reason this video does not show two out, is that very often two batsmen are at the same end, and very often the fielders are blocking his way - the other batsmen has to get out of the way of the fielders, so he's not expected to make it back...
they get out the first one, but since it was very close and may be not out or sent to third empire therefore they removed the stumps of 2nd to get out in case first is not out.
@narayana3590030 o.k so they had an opportunity of a run out at one end, but wanted to get out the better batsmen at the other end so threw it to there. But they were then worried they had messed this up and so to make sure of a wicket they threw it back to the first end and tried to get out the other one. However because the first guy was outside of his crease he was given out making the secong run out void.
yeh u cant get 2 batsman out at once they only done that cause they didnt know if that guy was in or not so they chucked the ball 2 the other end 2 make sure loloolol
Idiot Americans. They took out Inzamam-ul-haq because he is a world class batsman. Then they just played and took out the other side in case the first one made it inside the line. You cant get two batsmen in one ball. Its cricket not baseball...
Idiots. . . . .. the bails are never removed on the first set of stumps. . . They threw to the other end to get the better of the two batsmen out. . .
@erock800713 can you even spell cricket? Watch the entire video....what a dumbfuck motherfucker....always criticizing others....geez...you're a big pussy...
@erock800713 He is right! for example guy who got taken out 1st was Tandulkar(right stumps), guy who was runout last was Harbhajan(left stumps).. Who would you rather take out..??
@erock800713 THEY are definitely not idiots. If you've actually seen the entire video, you'll notice that at the end they get the second batsman as well.
@erock800713 you idiot, the bowler after dismissing the 'better' batsman out, threw it back t the keeper to get even the other one out. but that, of course, is not going to count..
yes you can. If one batsman is stumped and the other one is out of his crease like halfway up the pitch they are within their rights to stump the other aswell
I have played cricket for the last six years of my life, and I'm an umpire aswell. You cannot, I repeat, CANNOT get two batsmen out in one ball. If you for example do a similar thing to the Lankans, then the batsman whos bails were removed first, is out. That's it. End of discussion.
Please clear me, if a batsman is out then the ball will be declared dead automatically and another batsman cannot be out in a deal ball. Am I missing here something?
newbedfordsox 3 months ago 2
@newbedfordsox In the first place the keeper was holding onto the ball, trying to work out who they could run out. One of the batters may have been scoring lots of runs so they wanted to get him. So he threw it to the other end to get him out, but to make sure they'd at least get one wicket, they threw it back to the keeper. So they ran both ends out but only the first wicket counts and it's dead after that.
mindscat 3 months ago 3
@mindscat hii
niranjan2100 1 month ago
@newbedfordsox Yes, you are correct, however the decision of 'out' was not given because the umpire wished to use the video review, therefore the ball was still 'live' for them to attempt the second runout - once it was confirmed by the third umpire that it was out, then anything subsequent to that is redundant because the ball is then classed as dead. It's just that in TV cricket the umpire doesn't need to give an instant decision, so play can continue, then later they go back and review.
villafan001 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Umar Gul beamer to Dhoni - watch?v=5yAOTHostgs
aaqucnaona94 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
finally only one batsman given out (Kemp)..! good label of video to attract (or misguide) viewer !
altafnazir 6 months ago
Comment removed
altafnazir 6 months ago
lol
Blackhoundrise 6 months ago
Now hold on wheres this double run out? I can not see the wicket keeper actually hit the bails or stumps he goes for it then stops and throws it at the bowler?
jameshigz 6 months ago
@jameshigz
At 00.24
pdanushka 6 months ago
@pdanushka oh wow yeh haha... how'd i missed that i dont know
jameshigz 6 months ago
I feel sorry for the 17 ppl who got run out the same way....
meekobansal 8 months ago
yea isnt if the bails are broken to run them out dont you have to pluck the stump
ryanthomasmccallum 9 months ago
isn't that keeper one big guy
IpodToucherGames 9 months ago
What else do we expect from the sub continent... bunch of cheats
frankmat 9 months ago
@frankmat AND U ARE A IDIOT
Avas169 9 months ago
Fixed. Both gave their wicket away for gambling purposes. Both batsmen are on the take. Sad times.
MrDenizen 9 months ago
how did a child's game like baseball come into the talk? Anyways, that was some smart thinking by the lankans.
StupidNub 10 months ago
wat was the result?how many wickets 1 or 2?
Basil1004 10 months ago
cricket= baseball for homosexuals
clockandradio 10 months ago
@clockandradio funny guy..baseball is played in the land of homosexuals
donthomas143 10 months ago
@donthomas143 hahahahahah yea rite & u aint a faggot yourself? FUCK cricket play a real sport
BotonNegro 10 months ago
@BotonNegro Stupid American, go back to your "Baseball"
littlebritan 10 months ago 2
@BotonNegro dickheadt i was born in fuking guatemala i just live in america u fukin dumbass i swear u guys talk to much shit about the U.S
BotonNegro 10 months ago
@clockandradio look who is talking who himself is a homo sexual
dlfite10b 10 months ago
Guys just hear the commentary.
Kumar wanted the better batsmen out so he threw it to murali who took of the stumpsbut was not sure if the guy was out or not so he threw it back to the other end just to make sure they get atleast one wicket,
yes the ball is not dead after it hits the stumps but is dead after one guy gets out.
omairdurrani1 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
pakistan cricketers are fucking cheaters thts y they win some matches....
1) illegal bowling action.
2) intake of drugs bfore every match.
3) ball tampering to get good reverse swing of ball.
4) damaging the pitch between overs.
5) offering their wife and sister to sleep with opposition players for winning.
ajinkya3011 10 months ago
Yes they both were out....
themanoflaw 11 months ago
HEY ANY1 ??? DID THEY REALLY ACCEPTED IT AS TWO RUN OUTS ??? PLZ ANSWER
freestyldiver 11 months ago
@freestyldiver nah mate there are never double plays in cricket. the first batsman up the other end was the one to be dismissed. but they were not sure if they got him out so they tried at the other end. at the end of that play only one batsman can be out not two.
boroted 11 months ago
@freestyldiver No, they can't do that!
rana3570 10 months ago
what did erock800713 say ?
dwightyisback 11 months ago
It's simple, the wicket keeper throw the ball back to the bowler to try and go for the better batsman's wicket, but he wasn't sure if he was actually out, so just to make sure they actually got a wicket out of it, he threw the ball back to the wicketkeeper to break the stumps on that side, where the batsman was clearly a long way off.
ArcticFox72 11 months ago
India just Sucks..... idiot indians...
geniusgugu 11 months ago
@geniusgugu : Go fuck your mother then asshole.
pravin6691 11 months ago
@geniusgugu : Gofuck your mother then asshole.
pravin6691 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@geniusgugu : Go fuck your mother then asshole.
pravin6691 11 months ago
@geniusgugu Just remind me, who won the 2011 world cup? Yeah thats right, not your team.
thecricketer 10 months ago 2
@thecricketer hahaha.. Just Fuck off dude.. You people just got LUCK BY CHANCE :D
we dunt want dat CUP.. YOur ppl BEGGED dats why we gave that World cup to ya ppl..
Lmao.. now go n Wash ur ass dude.. ;D
geniusgugu 10 months ago 2
@geniusgugu U dont DESERVE that cup.
ma8740 10 months ago
@ma8740 V Don't "NEED" that piece of Shit dude =D
geniusgugu 10 months ago
@geniusgugu Replace NEED with DESERVE!!
ma8740 10 months ago
@geniusgugu And by the way, U shud have won that CUP, because U people have never won ANYTHING except hate.
ma8740 10 months ago
@geniusgugu get off bloody bastard india won wid its practice u pakis were just over confident
coolncutegirl21 10 months ago
@geniusgugu u didn't want dat cup ? HAhahahahahaha.
i call that sore ASS syndrome.
i can prescribe u a cream, try mylund cream.
HAhahahahah lol
nayiabhishek 10 months ago
@thecricketer no one won the world cup 2011 . but india bought the cup 2011
Ehtaram1 9 months ago
@geniusgugu i wud worship u !!!! TOTALLY MAN i agree !!!!
27charisma 10 months ago
@geniusgugu i want know what is your country ?respect the other country people because they r also human beings .don't u mother ,teacher, at least your country teach basic manners .shame full country
ranjith89mail 7 months ago
Clever cricket
starlonferns 11 months ago
Two batsman can not out in one ball. Not the rule.
druboful0 11 months ago
@druboful0 It definitely is possible.
AaronMarcBradford 11 months ago
Pakistan Sucks!!!!!!!!!!
sdarshan64 1 year ago
@sdarshan64 This isn't the Pakistani team dumbass, its some all star game.
ToshiSabriVideos 1 year ago
Someone who posted this video either knows nothing about cricket or is a noob
TutGuy789 1 year ago
you cant get two batsmen out with one ball... as soon as the bails come off in a run out appeal, the ball goes dead.
bloggulator 1 year ago
@bloggulator Actually, that's not true - if the batsman is not out, the ball is still live so had the first batsman made his ground the second would still have been out.
villafan001 1 year ago
@villafan001 No it isn't you dumb fuck. Breaking of the bails automatically indicates a dead ball.
sugarydonkey 1 year ago
@sugarydonkey No, I'm afraid you're mistaken, breaking the wicket does not render the ball dead under Law 23 - that is why, for example, if the fielder throws the ball at the stumps and hits but the batsman is safe and the balls ricochets to the boundary, it's a 4, and also if the fielding side attempt a run out and hit the stumps but the batsman is safe then they attempt another run, they can still be run out (even at the same end).
By the way, I'm not a 'dumb fuck'. I'm a cricket umpire.
villafan001 1 year ago 138
@villafan001 --- If you are an umpire you woudn't be blogging every day and night.
You are just a joker who can google the information online.
You know what... Law 23 speaks about "Long Stop" fielder and not dead ball.
Balls to you UMPIRE.... shame on you.
indiansnipper 10 months ago
@indiansnipper Firstly, I don't blog every day and night - in fact, I don't blog at all. Secondly, since Law 23 is titled 'Dead Ball', I think I was justified in citing it - for the record, there is no law regarding the long stop and nor can I see any reason why there would need to be.
And yes, I could google the information online. But I'd rather learn it.
villafan001 10 months ago
@villafan001
I don't get you. Do you mean that if the batsmen are safe and not attempting another run and yet the fielder hits the stump and the ball reaches the boundary, it's a four?
whotube88 9 months ago
@whotube88 Yes - it's a four plus whatever runs the batsmen had completed before the throw, plus the one they are on if they have crossed - in fact, it's happened before in the Ashes:
villafan001 9 months ago
@villafan001
I see! Yeah, I meant, four plus whatever the runs they have completed. That's interesting. Thanks a lot.
whotube88 9 months ago
@whotube88 Yes - it's a four plus whatever runs the batsmen had completed before the throw, plus the one they are on if they have crossed - in fact, it's happened before in the Ashes - search 'seven runs one ball' on Youtube.
villafan001 9 months ago
@villafan001 dumb bitch
PureAgainBOF3 8 months ago
@PureAgainBOF3 How very eloquent.
villafan001 8 months ago
@villafan001 dumb fuck
PureAgainBOF3 8 months ago
@villafan001 It worries me that a cricket umpire doesn't know that as soon as a player is out, the ball is dead. It is not possible *at all* to get two players out from one delivery. What's happening in this video is that they're breaking both ends to guarantee that they get one of them out.
Law 23.1(a)(iii) says the ball becomes dead as soon as a batsman is dismissed. Therefore it is not possible for both batsmen to be dimissed off the same ball. It has nothing to do with breaking the wicket.
yottskry12 7 months ago
@yottskry12 If you'd taken the time to actually read the thread that my latest comment was part of you would appreciate that I was perfectly aware of that - the point I was making is that assuming the batsman is NOT OUT, the ball is still live to attempt the second run out, contrary to someone who suggested the ball was dead after the first run out attempt.
villafan001 7 months ago
@villafan001 I apologise. I hadn't read the whole thread (there was too much of it), and your post came at the top, which is why I replied to it.
yottskry12 7 months ago
@villafan001 ive never seen this b4, id love to know what the correct decision is...
Ill have a wild guess that 2 batsmen cant be out in the same instance, please tell me if im right, or as i fear talking bolox :O)
stonersid 7 months ago
@stonersid You're quite right, yes.
villafan001 7 months ago
@stonersid As soon as a wicket falls, it's a dead ball so only the first run out counts as a wicket.
heelfan1234 7 months ago
@stonersid The first batsmam was given out . .
shashankrajkodesia 7 months ago
@villafan001 DUMB FUCK!!!! LMFAO!!!!!
bombs347 7 months ago
@bombs347 Sorry, and you are...?
villafan001 2 months ago
@sugarydonkey .. are u serious mate... so if the bails are broken i can keep running all day? or only be run out at one end? once the bails are broken at one end according to your 'own personal rule book" then ill just put both batsmen in thecrease at one end and the batsmen can take turns running to the end where the bails are broken and noone will get out....lol u idiot.. ofcourse they can still be run out... mate uve called another person a dumb fuck and u dont even know the rules... FAIL!!!!
Mopstylz 1 year ago
@Mopstylz shut up your making a dick of yourself. If the bails are broken and for what ever reason the batters are still running to take the wicket u must hold the ball against a stump and remove the stump from the ground.. If the batter is not in his crease its out. Must we explain to you what a ball is or stumps?
Stagtatstic 11 months ago
@Stagtatstic haha ur the idiot mate... lol i was being sarcastic.. and im actually a cricket umpire smart ass... u clearly didnt read wat i was replying at... go back and read it then read wat i said.. and then u can feel like a dick! . absolute w*nker!
Mopstylz 11 months ago
@Mopstylz why are there so many proud cricket umpires here? you must pull all the ladies with that number and of course your sarcastic sense of humour!
Stagtatstic 11 months ago
@Stagtatstic .. i see how u read it and u were taking it that i was asking the question as if i didnt know.. i was asking him the question sarcastically... read wat he said and ull understand...
Mopstylz 11 months ago
@Stagtatstic Or, of course, you could remake the wicket by replacing the bails and/or putting the stumps back into the ground and then break it again - and I would forward that the reason that there are 'so many' (I counted 2) cricket umpires commenting on this video is that it's a cricket video - strange coincidence really.
villafan001 11 months ago
@villafan001 where is your 3rd Ump?
Stagtatstic 11 months ago
@Stagtatstic Come now, I'm sure we won't need to review any of our decisions...
villafan001 11 months ago
new zealand to win the world cup
OzMafia 1 year ago
Friends w keeper waited for better batsman to cross the other one. then he threw ball towards non striker end and got him out.
Max1xify 1 year ago
WERE BOTH GIVEN OUT ?
crackofmybutt 1 year ago
Comment removed
PennydalePalace 1 year ago
@PennydalePalace are u serious ?? it was out his foot was in the air
wogswogs121 1 year ago
The ball isnt always dead with the first wicket.
The ball is dead when its fielded and dead.
The non-striker might be signalled to be out, while the ball is in flight, but if its then caught, the striker is out, and the non-striker survives.
The reason this video does not show two out, is that very often two batsmen are at the same end, and very often the fielders are blocking his way - the other batsmen has to get out of the way of the fielders, so he's not expected to make it back...
isilder 1 year ago
@ Volvoxii: yes, the instant a batsman is dismissed the ball becomes dead (Law 23 of the Laws of Cricket)
clokworkpig 1 year ago
they get out the first one, but since it was very close and may be not out or sent to third empire therefore they removed the stumps of 2nd to get out in case first is not out.
kashifbashirbhatti 1 year ago
No, as soon as the catch is good there can be no run-out.
CaptainPedant 1 year ago
the only something like this is possible is if a catch and runout are at the exact same time
kazadancingmongoose 1 year ago
I thought once someone got out, the ball goes dead...
Volvoxii 1 year ago
was this valid?? were the two wickets given at a time????????? please reply
narayana3590030 1 year ago
@narayana3590030
I would doubt it was. Ruling is, as soon as there is one wicket, the ball is considered dead, so anything that happens there after is not valid.
LFCDanny123 1 year ago
@narayana3590030 o.k so they had an opportunity of a run out at one end, but wanted to get out the better batsmen at the other end so threw it to there. But they were then worried they had messed this up and so to make sure of a wicket they threw it back to the first end and tried to get out the other one. However because the first guy was outside of his crease he was given out making the secong run out void.
wafflesmonroe 1 year ago 18
This has been flagged as spam show
one will be given only.....
sweeeetlemon 1 year ago
this vidio
MrMuneeb45 1 year ago
in run out only 1 batsman can get out officially right not 2?
mustafabinumar 1 year ago
@mustafabinumar
In any kind of OUT only one batsman can get out.
hitrohit2001 1 year ago
wow...brave thing to do.It could have gone all wrong if murali miss the ball...
Then it will be a such a embrazing moment,
Hats off to sanga to act wisely in that situvation.
AirMarshal81 1 year ago
@realizationable sangakkara was the wicket keeper i believe..otherwise all gd
vin8709 1 year ago
thats smart cricket
GRIMREAPER1000000000 1 year ago
what happened to the bat?
KWtheAcer 1 year ago
@realhindumadrid oye teri maa ka thoku hai inzi
p0nting 1 year ago
yeh u cant get 2 batsman out at once they only done that cause they didnt know if that guy was in or not so they chucked the ball 2 the other end 2 make sure loloolol
xDaFFyDuCk 1 year ago
fool just one run out
faheemboy 1 year ago
America plays cricket now?
faster2695 1 year ago
this is crap
elliewhy 1 year ago
inzamam that fat pig realy cant run
RealHinduMadrid 1 year ago
safe cuz
MrSafe160 1 year ago
some teams like bangladesh can do only 1 run out........
sahilguleria2330 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the players in blue are from srilanka and the players in green are from kenya...you dumpass !!!
TheTreybrotherhood 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ravirocky7388 the players in blue are from srilanka and the players in green are from kenya...you dumpass !!! #LOL
TheTreybrotherhood 1 year ago
one team is pakistan and the other americans..cant believe it
ravirocky7388 1 year ago
@ravirocky7388 the players in blue are from srilanka and the players in green are from kenya...you dumpass !!! #LOL
TheTreybrotherhood 1 year ago
it is afro-asia cup match being played .the match is between asia xi and africa xi.the batsman being run out is justin kemp.keeper is sangakara
johnrox2311 1 year ago
@johnrox2311 thankz john..but many of them giving different answers..but i think u r rite
ravirocky7388 1 year ago
Idiot Americans. They took out Inzamam-ul-haq because he is a world class batsman. Then they just played and took out the other side in case the first one made it inside the line. You cant get two batsmen in one ball. Its cricket not baseball...
pakistanroxify 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@pakistanroxify the players in blue are from srilanka and the players in green are from kenya...you dumpass !!!
TheTreybrotherhood 1 year ago
wow an excellent presence both r definetly out....
savitagr8 1 year ago
Nice presence of mind. I heard hat it was both out.
ASRV2012 1 year ago
two run outs waaaa seems like rules are changing everyday....NOT
aliomema 1 year ago
where the hell is his bat???
stealthynewb 1 year ago
It's a dead ball as soon as the first one is out, therefore the other one can't be run out.
heelfan1234 1 year ago 2
Idiots. . . . .. the bails are never removed on the first set of stumps. . . They threw to the other end to get the better of the two batsmen out. . .
erock800713 2 years ago 71
@erock800713
Exactly
MessiWorldwidefan 1 year ago
@erock800713 Just curious: so there is no such thing as a double play in Cricket? That would be cool if you could get two wickets in one bowl.
paladin313 1 year ago
@erock800713 yeh and then he threw it back Again and got the other one out
bilsta666 1 year ago
@erock800713 see last couple of seconds of video wickets@keeper end were also distroyed.
dinkerjoshi 1 year ago
@erock800713 you're the idiot, murali threw it back after he ran the better batsman out to make sure...
fuck
Connojack 1 year ago
@erock800713 r u stupid
thedeadburgerman2580 1 year ago
@erock800713 can you even spell cricket? Watch the entire video....what a dumbfuck motherfucker....always criticizing others....geez...you're a big pussy...
papan1990 1 year ago
@erock800713 r u metally handicapped watch the whole thing
hullukyrpa 1 year ago
@erock800713 R U MENTALLY HANDICAPPED? WATCH THE WHOLE THING
hullukyrpa 1 year ago
@erock800713 Yes they were..........right at the end if you keep watching.
discunt69 1 year ago
@erock800713 He is right! for example guy who got taken out 1st was Tandulkar(right stumps), guy who was runout last was Harbhajan(left stumps).. Who would you rather take out..??
Cartyy 1 year ago
@Cartyy ...those were pakistanis... jus' sayin'
UtopiaIsInMyMind 1 year ago
@erock800713 idiot watch the whole video
Penissniffer 1 year ago
@Penissniffer what are you talking about you pillock
tomo44139 1 year ago
@erock800713
You stupid fucktard. Watch the whole video.
zaran08 1 year ago
@erock800713 Clap Clap for the Handicap!
RichmondHasArrived 1 year ago
@erock800713 THEY are definitely not idiots. If you've actually seen the entire video, you'll notice that at the end they get the second batsman as well.
luckystrike4321 11 months ago
@erock800713 you idiot, the bowler after dismissing the 'better' batsman out, threw it back t the keeper to get even the other one out. but that, of course, is not going to count..
hgafbf 11 months ago
@erock800713 At the end of the vid he throws it back to the other end to run out the other guy aswell
DavAtNo6 11 months ago
amazing
AaronHenley88 2 years ago
I think they threw the ball down the other end just in case the first one wasn't out,
capio78 2 years ago 2
i know u cant get em both out at a time
but good attempt though
lolz
the147break 2 years ago
after the 1st wicket; its a dead ball...
dilshanf69 2 years ago
Naa u cant run out 2 playerz at same time...itz rule! if u dont know that then learn bout it!
RockY4209 2 years ago
I wish america was as cool
SlinkROPG 2 years ago 51
@SlinkROPG well its not so live with with it
MEGADhanny 11 months ago
very clever piece of feilding by the Lankans.
zahidmm 2 years ago
Lol
AussieDude00 2 years ago
haha
samsanto45 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
actually u can get both out, u guys have to take the stump out of the second run out.
xXxTonkzxXx 2 years ago
no you cant, its not like baseball where you can get a double play. As soon as the first wicket falls, it is a dead ball
BaboonBaksideStudios 2 years ago
wrong.
teeheee903 2 years ago
Are you for real man ??
chathu05 2 years ago
@xXxTonkzxXx no you cannot get ehm both out. Shut up tosser.
DamienPMcC 2 years ago 2
yes you can. If one batsman is stumped and the other one is out of his crease like halfway up the pitch they are within their rights to stump the other aswell
theuglyhairmonster 2 years ago
I have played cricket for the last six years of my life, and I'm an umpire aswell. You cannot, I repeat, CANNOT get two batsmen out in one ball. If you for example do a similar thing to the Lankans, then the batsman whos bails were removed first, is out. That's it. End of discussion.
DamienPMcC 2 years ago 4
yeah you are right i was wrong coz i just looked it up but seriously is there any need there any need to be a prick about it because you umpire?
theuglyhairmonster 2 years ago
sorry, it just shits me when people tell me im wrong about something that I am educated in. Sorry
DamienPMcC 2 years ago
You are a moron. 2 people cannot be given out off of one delivery, Damien PMcC is correct.
Gummerman 2 years ago
oh yeah and that dosent make you a prick for replying to something thats already been cleared up
theuglyhairmonster 2 years ago
@Gummerman and one year on i have returned to tell you, you got epicly trolled
theuglyhairmonster2 11 months ago
@Gummerman Narrrrr get fucked
Gummerman 11 months ago
Oh got Ireland LOL!!!
sherwoodxxx 2 years ago
i dont get why the wicket keeper didnt just quickly took the bails off in the first place? there would have been no difference lol
dylforster 2 years ago