This must have been a real crack team to plant all the explosives without being noticed even once. Must have been Navy SEALS. Please note the sarcasm here. How do you call yourselves "truthers" when you live in a fantasy world? If I felt the government was responsible for this or anything like it on our own soil you would not be able to calm my rage. I would do a lot more than just watch videos on youtube and bitch. If you REALLY feel that you are right then I challenge you all
@trekfanful to get up off your asses and do something about it. Isn't the whole situation, including the aftermath that we are still experiencing, bad enough for you? This country still has not completely healed. Sometimes I wonder if we ever will. That being said I think a good start would be ending the war.
@trekfanful please don't respond to any of this. I will not respond back. I know most people viewing this or any video like it are there to see what they want to see anyway.
All I know is that all the footage I have seen shows PLANES FLYING INTO BUILDINGS!!!!! I'm just shooting in the dark here but I'm thinking it's a possibility,remote as it may seem, that that may have something to do with it. Maybe there was some sort of structural damage done as a result that. I know it sounds totally ridiculous but that's my best guess until I see some sign of something else. Just an uneducated guess sure but best I can do here.
ok how many people commenting here know anything about construction and the way buildings are built? 0 okay. does anyone here have experience with large scale demolitions? okay 0 again. now has anyone here seen a 747 jet fly into a building before? in person or on video, they're both ok.. wow shocker 0 again.
so it seems all of us have the explanation to and event involving all of the above situations.....but none of us have any experience in any of those fields.
Dust in the wind......all these buildings were dust in the wind. I close my eyes only for the moment, and the evidence is gone. It slips away, and even Cheney likes to tell a few lies.... Dust in the wind....all they were was dust in the wind.
You're only wrong if you get caught...... Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz, have been caught. LET'S GET A REAL INVESTIGATION STARTED!
Crisp, clear, plain as day totally in your face. Still some people refuse to believe it. Hey morons, theres a fucking cock in your face, look, its a cock in your face. Its flattened your nose, can you not smell the cock in your face?
@Seigu007 Dude. An airliner smashed into the side of it causing raging fires of hundreds of gallons of jet fuel. The whole upper portion of the building collapsed. How could it NOT happen?
@NoogahOogah The Twin Towers came straight down, which means that each building’s 287 steel columns all had to fail simultaneously; to believe this could happen without explosives is to believe in magic.
@Seigu007 Dude. Read this carefully: One floor collapsed straight down. There were floors supported by this floor, and when this floor fell, the floors above it came down with it, thus exerting a tremendous amount of weight onto the floor below. Due to the sudden weight, that floor also collapsed, and thus and thus in a chain reaction vertically down.
@NoogahOogah Virtually all of the concrete in the towers was pulverized into extremely fine dust particles; to believe that fire plus gravity could have done this is to believe in magic.
You my friend are full of shit... You fell to mention the core, and the "Pancake story" does not work and has been disproved. ...and you have not explained, the buildings turning to dust before even hitting the ground, the molten steel, nor the explosive ejection of huge pieces of steel. Now, pull your head from your ass, and do some research. I know it's easy to spout bullshit logic, but the laws of physics always wins. 9/11 = Inside Job.
@Born2Flesh Firstly, the building was not turning to dust before it it the ground. There was airplane wreckage, and office equipment which filled the building. I bet there was plenty of drywall in there as well. Also, there was not molten steel. Never was any molten steel found. I don't know why people keep insisting there was. There are lots of well written sources debunking those claims. I suggest you read them if you're daring enough. (Oh, and the "pancake" effect has not been "disproven".)
Are you trying to convince me? lol You would do better trying to convince the government it's okay to release all the confiscated videos. lol You dumb bastard, even firefighters reported molten steel. lol Dust was everywhere you fucking moron. lol Check this out ------> Kiss my ass!
@Born2Flesh No, to be honest, I don't really feel there's much a chance of convincing you. You've made up your mind about this, obviously. But as long as you have questions, I will try to provide answers. Firstly, molten metal =/= molten steel. A firefighter, good hearted though he may be, is not a blacksmith. He won't know the difference. Secondly, are you trying to tell me that when buildings collapse (particularly some of the tallest ones in the world), they DON'T spew clouds of dust?
@Born2Flesh My job? Is someone paying me? No. I do this in respect of about 3,000 people who lost their lives. I find it highly disgusting that people like you try to go around flaunting nasty and suspicious conspiracy theories to suggest that their deaths were the result of a deliberate mass murder perpetrated by their own government. You deceive innocent people with your misinformation and pseudo-scientific claims, slapping all our honorable investigators and scientific minds in the face.
You have got to ber one dumb bastard......All the videos of 9/11 show the buildings turning to dust. ...and molten steel was reported even by the firemen. Why don't you look at the videos on youtube and do some investigation before you try to give answers to questions that I never asked you for. I never asked you to reply to my post , and I'm sure I never asked you any questions....... So, go suck something, and get lost.
@Born2Flesh So basically, you don't care if you're wrong or not? Guess what? You are wrong. And if you cared to know why, you could easily find out. Many a website offers legitimate and scientific explanations for your observations. I don't know why you are so desperate to deny the scientists, the investigators, the footage, the evidence, the hundreds of eye witnesses. You are causing the undue suspicion of innocent people. You ought make certain you are right before accusing people of murder.
No, I just don't care for your fallacious logic. Who is paying you to spout bullshit? Even the initial investigators want a new investigation because they were not allowed to use all the information available. "undue suspicion"? So why after ten(10) years are the videos from the Pentagon still being kept away from the public? This plane is over 60 tons of material......you don't even see 5 tons of debris at the pentagon. "accuse people of murder"? ...I only asked relevant questions
@Born2Flesh Don't play innocent like all you're doing is asking questions. If all you had was questions, you would pay attention to answers, which are provided in ample amounts. But you yourself said: "I'm sure I never asked you any questions". You are too accusing people of murder. You are saying the United States government deliberately demolished the building, thereby killing innocent people. Hence, murder. In reality, they are as innocent as you or me. Go use Google if you have questions.
If you don't see the buildings turning to dust before hitting the ground, you're blind, an idiot, or you're paid to be a idiot. Even the firemen at the WTC thought it strange. No, the fact is, you need to do the research, and stfu until then. YOUR ANSWERS ARE WORTHLESS! ...and it's very obvious you have an agenda to hide the truth. Well, fu
@Born2Flesh Dude. Did I say "there is no dust cloud emanating from the 1,300 foot collapsing building"? I did not. Such a thing, strange though you may consider it, hardly proves that the collapse of the world trade center, and the death of 2,752 people (which includes those on the airplanes) was the result of a conspiracy within our own government which was somehow kept completely secret. Why do you keep telling me I need to do the research? Take your own advice.
@NoogahOogah It's sad that these people take something like this and turn it into an excuse to spew their anti government rage. I'm as anti government as anyone but I also have common sense. I'm no fan of Bush but even I have a very difficult time believing that he would be that evil. I will always believe that people see what they want. Funny though. It seems that in many ways 9/11 didn't end on 9/11.
@Born2Flesh So you're asking us to believe two contradictory things here. 1) That the government was smart enough to pull of the destruction at the pentagon and had the resources and manpower to do it. 2) that they wern't forsightful enough to to make it look convincing.
@Seigu007 Dude. Read this carefully: One floor collapsed straight down. There were floors supported by this floor, and when this floor fell, the floors above it came down with it, thus exerting a tremendous amount of weight onto the floor below. Due to the sudden weight, that floor also collapsed, and thus and thus in a chain reaction vertically down.
@NoogahOogah At the onset of each tower’s collapse, steel beams were ejected out as far as 600 feet; to believe that these horizontal ejections could be explained by gravitational energy, which is vertical, is to believe in magic.
Don't bother. Your dislike of dissent and refusal to consider research other than your own has already been noted to me by my friend, tyburnstree. What was it you said....oh yes, 'Go and have a word with jizzmonger et al, and say hi from me.' byyeeee!! AMF
I'm not a physicists by any stretch but I don know that if the floors are pancaking from above the air in the buildings is going to go out via the path of least resistance, i.e. the windows. The fact that the 'squibs' occur in a random manner from the top down AFTER the building begins to collapse rather than in an ordered fashion from the bottom up BEFORE the buildings begin to collapse indicates the building collapsed for some other reason than controlled demolition.
Never mind that the squibs occur randomly and proceed from the top down AFTER the collapse begins rather than orderly from the bottom up BEFORE the collapse begins as is characteristic of a controlled demolition. You would have us believe conspirators placed explosive in an occupied building when anyone who has bothered to look knows it takes months to plan and execute a CD. Part of the prep is gutting the building to expose beams and trusses so explosives can be properly placed.
Yes, and that debunks the squibs how? Just because it outwardly seems implausible for this to be an inside job, to you, doesn't mean evidence to suggest that it is just goes away.
If they are squibs, why do they not act in the normal patterns of those seen in controlled demolition? How is it that the required amounts of explosives, thermite, nano-thermites, or whatever supposedly was used was placed over months of preparation without anyone noticing? How is it that conspirators could properly place the explosives w/o exposing beams and trusses w/o some one noticing? Ever blow air into a paper bag, hold it closed with one hand and slap it with the other? What happens?
Blowing a bag full of air and slapping it with a hand? That is probably the worst analogy I have ever heard. WTC wasn't anything like an airtight enclosure. Why are they happening 10-20 stories below the actual collapse? Where did the dust come from? Nothing that far down had been destroyed yet. Do you expect me to believe compressed air pulverized concrete? There is nothing about them that fits with a gravity driven collapse.
I made no mention of concrete being pulverized by compressed air. The question is which exerts sufficient force to pulverize concrete in a manner such as WTC, gravitational collapse of thousands of tons of material or explosive blast. I don't expect you to believe a single thing I post as we are obviously on opposing sides of this argument. However, if you care to research you can find information that demonstrates the requirements to pulverize concrete. 911myths [.] com [/] WTCONC1 [.] pdf
You completely missed the point. it doesn't matter that you didn't mention it. The squibs blow out pyroclastic dust 10-20 stories below the actual collapse which was the only place concrete could have been pulverized meaning that the dust would have had to travel faster (and through a round about path) than the actual collapse, and then blew out seemingly random places. That is patently absurd like just about everything else in the official story.
Comment removed
BoardSkate73 22 hours ago
This must have been a real crack team to plant all the explosives without being noticed even once. Must have been Navy SEALS. Please note the sarcasm here. How do you call yourselves "truthers" when you live in a fantasy world? If I felt the government was responsible for this or anything like it on our own soil you would not be able to calm my rage. I would do a lot more than just watch videos on youtube and bitch. If you REALLY feel that you are right then I challenge you all
trekfanful 6 months ago
@trekfanful to get up off your asses and do something about it. Isn't the whole situation, including the aftermath that we are still experiencing, bad enough for you? This country still has not completely healed. Sometimes I wonder if we ever will. That being said I think a good start would be ending the war.
trekfanful 6 months ago
@trekfanful please don't respond to any of this. I will not respond back. I know most people viewing this or any video like it are there to see what they want to see anyway.
trekfanful 6 months ago
All I know is that all the footage I have seen shows PLANES FLYING INTO BUILDINGS!!!!! I'm just shooting in the dark here but I'm thinking it's a possibility,remote as it may seem, that that may have something to do with it. Maybe there was some sort of structural damage done as a result that. I know it sounds totally ridiculous but that's my best guess until I see some sign of something else. Just an uneducated guess sure but best I can do here.
trekfanful 6 months ago
ok how many people commenting here know anything about construction and the way buildings are built? 0 okay. does anyone here have experience with large scale demolitions? okay 0 again. now has anyone here seen a 747 jet fly into a building before? in person or on video, they're both ok.. wow shocker 0 again.
so it seems all of us have the explanation to and event involving all of the above situations.....but none of us have any experience in any of those fields.
hmmmmmm doesn't that sound odd
XxxxExclusivexxxX 6 months ago
Big Lie
other
People Die
Little Lie
you
Die.
lazyfreedom98 7 months ago
a picture speaks a thousand words
spineadjuster13 9 months ago
this was controlled demolition not, STRUCTURAL FAILURE>
mooremichael95 9 months ago
If you think this was due to fires...I've got a bridge I wanna sell you.
mkrbyarts 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Whoever thinks this is the cause of structural failure due to fire is completely brain-dead.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
Dust in the wind......all these buildings were dust in the wind. I close my eyes only for the moment, and the evidence is gone. It slips away, and even Cheney likes to tell a few lies.... Dust in the wind....all they were was dust in the wind.
You're only wrong if you get caught...... Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz, have been caught. LET'S GET A REAL INVESTIGATION STARTED!
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
don't fuck with the US government, they'll blow up a skyscraper and blame it on black people.
InsaneChicken123 1 year ago
@InsaneChicken123 you're just a moron.
trekfanful 6 months ago
@trekfanful Is that all? I thought I was also a Paki basher...
InsaneChicken123 6 months ago
is there more of this video i wanted to see if any movment on wtc7
CuzPBz 1 year ago
Crisp, clear, plain as day totally in your face. Still some people refuse to believe it. Hey morons, theres a fucking cock in your face, look, its a cock in your face. Its flattened your nose, can you not smell the cock in your face?
educution 1 year ago
Super. Was this from the PBS doc where the audio says it was too chaotic, cataclysmic, etc?
WTCdemolitions 1 year ago
Not sure. I'll dig out the original clip. Is on a different box.
femr2 1 year ago
Notice the air squibs due to the air trying to escape out ward, the cores stood longer so no demolition was possible.
Ya all need a pill to calm down the RAGE and Hate Towards the Great G.W.B.
SkuIICrusherGhost 7 months ago
@femr2 Yes I know you truthers have an alergic reaction to facts.
reblives 1 year ago
How does a building turn to power like this without the aide of explosives? Are people really that naive and oblivious?
Seigu007 2 years ago 11
@Seigu007 Dude. An airliner smashed into the side of it causing raging fires of hundreds of gallons of jet fuel. The whole upper portion of the building collapsed. How could it NOT happen?
NoogahOogah 1 year ago
@NoogahOogah The Twin Towers came straight down, which means that each building’s 287 steel columns all had to fail simultaneously; to believe this could happen without explosives is to believe in magic.
Seigu007 1 year ago 3
@Seigu007 Dude. Read this carefully: One floor collapsed straight down. There were floors supported by this floor, and when this floor fell, the floors above it came down with it, thus exerting a tremendous amount of weight onto the floor below. Due to the sudden weight, that floor also collapsed, and thus and thus in a chain reaction vertically down.
NoogahOogah 1 year ago
@NoogahOogah Virtually all of the concrete in the towers was pulverized into extremely fine dust particles; to believe that fire plus gravity could have done this is to believe in magic.
Seigu007 1 year ago
You my friend are full of shit... You fell to mention the core, and the "Pancake story" does not work and has been disproved. ...and you have not explained, the buildings turning to dust before even hitting the ground, the molten steel, nor the explosive ejection of huge pieces of steel. Now, pull your head from your ass, and do some research. I know it's easy to spout bullshit logic, but the laws of physics always wins. 9/11 = Inside Job.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh Firstly, the building was not turning to dust before it it the ground. There was airplane wreckage, and office equipment which filled the building. I bet there was plenty of drywall in there as well. Also, there was not molten steel. Never was any molten steel found. I don't know why people keep insisting there was. There are lots of well written sources debunking those claims. I suggest you read them if you're daring enough. (Oh, and the "pancake" effect has not been "disproven".)
NoogahOogah 10 months ago
Are you trying to convince me? lol You would do better trying to convince the government it's okay to release all the confiscated videos. lol You dumb bastard, even firefighters reported molten steel. lol Dust was everywhere you fucking moron. lol Check this out ------> Kiss my ass!
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh No, to be honest, I don't really feel there's much a chance of convincing you. You've made up your mind about this, obviously. But as long as you have questions, I will try to provide answers. Firstly, molten metal =/= molten steel. A firefighter, good hearted though he may be, is not a blacksmith. He won't know the difference. Secondly, are you trying to tell me that when buildings collapse (particularly some of the tallest ones in the world), they DON'T spew clouds of dust?
NoogahOogah 10 months ago
When did I ask you to convince me of anything? Is that your job? Is someone paying you to convince me? Get lost, dickhead.. 9/11 = Inside Job
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh My job? Is someone paying me? No. I do this in respect of about 3,000 people who lost their lives. I find it highly disgusting that people like you try to go around flaunting nasty and suspicious conspiracy theories to suggest that their deaths were the result of a deliberate mass murder perpetrated by their own government. You deceive innocent people with your misinformation and pseudo-scientific claims, slapping all our honorable investigators and scientific minds in the face.
NoogahOogah 10 months ago
I forgot......I'm sorry......I forgot you were the guy who found the Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
"honorable investigators"? You sound like you just walked out of a cartoon. lol
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@NoogahOogah nicely said. It is reprehensible. It's as if they feel there has not been enough pain over this.
trekfanful 6 months ago
I never asked you any questions about anything, dumbass.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
You have got to ber one dumb bastard......All the videos of 9/11 show the buildings turning to dust. ...and molten steel was reported even by the firemen. Why don't you look at the videos on youtube and do some investigation before you try to give answers to questions that I never asked you for. I never asked you to reply to my post , and I'm sure I never asked you any questions....... So, go suck something, and get lost.
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh So basically, you don't care if you're wrong or not? Guess what? You are wrong. And if you cared to know why, you could easily find out. Many a website offers legitimate and scientific explanations for your observations. I don't know why you are so desperate to deny the scientists, the investigators, the footage, the evidence, the hundreds of eye witnesses. You are causing the undue suspicion of innocent people. You ought make certain you are right before accusing people of murder.
NoogahOogah 10 months ago
No, I just don't care for your fallacious logic. Who is paying you to spout bullshit? Even the initial investigators want a new investigation because they were not allowed to use all the information available. "undue suspicion"? So why after ten(10) years are the videos from the Pentagon still being kept away from the public? This plane is over 60 tons of material......you don't even see 5 tons of debris at the pentagon. "accuse people of murder"? ...I only asked relevant questions
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh Don't play innocent like all you're doing is asking questions. If all you had was questions, you would pay attention to answers, which are provided in ample amounts. But you yourself said: "I'm sure I never asked you any questions". You are too accusing people of murder. You are saying the United States government deliberately demolished the building, thereby killing innocent people. Hence, murder. In reality, they are as innocent as you or me. Go use Google if you have questions.
NoogahOogah 10 months ago
If you don't see the buildings turning to dust before hitting the ground, you're blind, an idiot, or you're paid to be a idiot. Even the firemen at the WTC thought it strange. No, the fact is, you need to do the research, and stfu until then. YOUR ANSWERS ARE WORTHLESS! ...and it's very obvious you have an agenda to hide the truth. Well, fu
Born2Flesh 10 months ago
@Born2Flesh Dude. Did I say "there is no dust cloud emanating from the 1,300 foot collapsing building"? I did not. Such a thing, strange though you may consider it, hardly proves that the collapse of the world trade center, and the death of 2,752 people (which includes those on the airplanes) was the result of a conspiracy within our own government which was somehow kept completely secret. Why do you keep telling me I need to do the research? Take your own advice.
NoogahOogah 10 months ago
@NoogahOogah It's sad that these people take something like this and turn it into an excuse to spew their anti government rage. I'm as anti government as anyone but I also have common sense. I'm no fan of Bush but even I have a very difficult time believing that he would be that evil. I will always believe that people see what they want. Funny though. It seems that in many ways 9/11 didn't end on 9/11.
trekfanful 6 months ago
@Born2Flesh So you're asking us to believe two contradictory things here. 1) That the government was smart enough to pull of the destruction at the pentagon and had the resources and manpower to do it. 2) that they wern't forsightful enough to to make it look convincing.
trekfanful 6 months ago
You are sooo full of shit... lol Even the films of the collapse, and the aftermath of the collapse, prove your logic is total bullshit.
Born2Flesh 6 months ago
@Born2Flesh Tell that to the scientists.
NoogahOogah 6 months ago
@Seigu007 Dude. Read this carefully: One floor collapsed straight down. There were floors supported by this floor, and when this floor fell, the floors above it came down with it, thus exerting a tremendous amount of weight onto the floor below. Due to the sudden weight, that floor also collapsed, and thus and thus in a chain reaction vertically down.
NoogahOogah 1 year ago
@NoogahOogah At the onset of each tower’s collapse, steel beams were ejected out as far as 600 feet; to believe that these horizontal ejections could be explained by gravitational energy, which is vertical, is to believe in magic.
Seigu007 1 year ago 2
watch?v=acTcwA_YHuA
femr2 2 years ago
Don't bother. Your dislike of dissent and refusal to consider research other than your own has already been noted to me by my friend, tyburnstree. What was it you said....oh yes, 'Go and have a word with jizzmonger et al, and say hi from me.' byyeeee!! AMF
swiftnicknevison 2 years ago
I'm not a physicists by any stretch but I don know that if the floors are pancaking from above the air in the buildings is going to go out via the path of least resistance, i.e. the windows. The fact that the 'squibs' occur in a random manner from the top down AFTER the building begins to collapse rather than in an ordered fashion from the bottom up BEFORE the buildings begin to collapse indicates the building collapsed for some other reason than controlled demolition.
swiftnicknevison 2 years ago
A building dosen't just completely break apart like that simply from a plane impact.
louisevale2 2 years ago 3
0:11 you can see some good squibs well below the actual collapse.
priapus512 2 years ago 3
Never mind that the squibs occur randomly and proceed from the top down AFTER the collapse begins rather than orderly from the bottom up BEFORE the collapse begins as is characteristic of a controlled demolition. You would have us believe conspirators placed explosive in an occupied building when anyone who has bothered to look knows it takes months to plan and execute a CD. Part of the prep is gutting the building to expose beams and trusses so explosives can be properly placed.
swiftnicknevison 2 years ago
Yes, and that debunks the squibs how? Just because it outwardly seems implausible for this to be an inside job, to you, doesn't mean evidence to suggest that it is just goes away.
priapus512 2 years ago
If they are squibs, why do they not act in the normal patterns of those seen in controlled demolition? How is it that the required amounts of explosives, thermite, nano-thermites, or whatever supposedly was used was placed over months of preparation without anyone noticing? How is it that conspirators could properly place the explosives w/o exposing beams and trusses w/o some one noticing? Ever blow air into a paper bag, hold it closed with one hand and slap it with the other? What happens?
swiftnicknevison 2 years ago
Blowing a bag full of air and slapping it with a hand? That is probably the worst analogy I have ever heard. WTC wasn't anything like an airtight enclosure. Why are they happening 10-20 stories below the actual collapse? Where did the dust come from? Nothing that far down had been destroyed yet. Do you expect me to believe compressed air pulverized concrete? There is nothing about them that fits with a gravity driven collapse.
priapus512 2 years ago 2
I made no mention of concrete being pulverized by compressed air. The question is which exerts sufficient force to pulverize concrete in a manner such as WTC, gravitational collapse of thousands of tons of material or explosive blast. I don't expect you to believe a single thing I post as we are obviously on opposing sides of this argument. However, if you care to research you can find information that demonstrates the requirements to pulverize concrete. 911myths [.] com [/] WTCONC1 [.] pdf
swiftnicknevison 2 years ago
You completely missed the point. it doesn't matter that you didn't mention it. The squibs blow out pyroclastic dust 10-20 stories below the actual collapse which was the only place concrete could have been pulverized meaning that the dust would have had to travel faster (and through a round about path) than the actual collapse, and then blew out seemingly random places. That is patently absurd like just about everything else in the official story.
911debunkers[.]blogspot[.]com
priapus512 2 years ago
whoever thinks this is the cause of strucutral failure due to fire is completely braindead.
rabimmel 2 years ago 14
@rabimmel Why? It happened.
NoogahOogah 1 year ago
v nice
rifleman0007 2 years ago