sorry its not hard to debunk when you know the height of the cables used. convenient how footage just stops, why not show the whole thing until we see the whole moon? oh thats right stage isnt big enough! fuck i laugh at you dreamers that want to beleive this shit!! poor lost souls! yeh they went to the moon, but not in that crappy tin can all we have seen is lies. And fuckheads dop some study, the russians are in on it and now most of the world is too. Its a bigger lie than you lot can imagine.
@bjm351 Sooo ignorant! The LM didn't raise high enough to film the whole Moon. It met and docked with the CSM in a comparatively low orbit. Then it was discarded.
But, You are welcome to keep on laughing. At Your own total ignorance...
@YDDES lmao!! my ignorance? ok so now you want to say that the CSM was about 90ft off the ground in orbit??? haaa haaaaa god damn your stupid. oh and explain to me EXACTLY `how` it managed to take off from the moon with 8 charges placed on it that wouldve blown it to shit. remember the astronauts couldnt do anything amazing in their footage so its not like the LEM was weightless. the same LEM that left no imprints on the moon. this is fun watching you dig a hole for yourself!!
@bjm351 Did I say the film shows the whole way up to the docking? No. I just said: "The LM didn't raise high enough to film the whole Moon".
What " 8 charges placed on it"? What are You talking about? And " remember the astronauts couldnt do anything amazing in their footage so its not like the LEM was weightless. the same LEM that left no imprints on the moon". What does that actually mean???
@YDDES You said comparitivley low orbit, which i took as your excuse for the camera cutting off early. My point being that even if it did have to go higher to the CSM theres still absolutely no reason why they couldnt keep filming or at least pan around on the way up to show a different view but no it always moves away from the borders of their set so we cant see beyond the `horizon`. And what do you mean what do i mean? how do you think the they took off from the moon? apart from cables.
@bjm351 The camera wasn't manuevered by the astronauts (they had other things to do). It was mounted in the LEM, so it followed its movements. When the LEM tilted, the camera tilted. No "panning", since the whole LEM should have had to swing around to do that. The important thing was to reach the right orbit.
They, of course, took off from Moon by starting the ascent stage's rocket engine. What did You think?
@YDDES FAIL. watch the video again. So your saying the camera followed the LEMs movements? well if you gou by that then at one stage the LEM is a 90 degree turn onto its side then filming down at the moon!! wich would mean the LEM would be rocking like hell all over the place and go off course. we know this didnt happen from the outside shot which show it getting pulled straight up and not moving at all. so try again.
@bjm351 Wrong. The video showing the Apollo 15 from outside at lift-off, doesn't show when it tilts to gain horisontal speed to insert in orbit. Since the camera couldn't tilt upwards to follow it, the LEM disappears in a few seconds, before the tilt. Check "Apollo15 Lunar Lift-off Lunar Rover Camera".
@YDDES You said comparitivley low orbit, which i took as your excuse for the camera cutting off early. My point being that even if it did have to go higher to the CSM theres still absolutely no reason why they couldnt keep filming or at least pan around on the way up to show a different view but no it always moves away from the borders of their set so we cant see beyond the `horizon`. And what do you mean what do i mean? how do you think the they took off from the moon? apart from cables.
to me this ultimately proves that this was no stage or whatever,it would be totaly impossible to fake such a scene of them vast proportions,i hope this serves a lesson to any would be cts
the windows of the LM are angled down, 45 degrees?so they could see the ground.
it s real.
tailendcharlie 5 months ago
sorry its not hard to debunk when you know the height of the cables used. convenient how footage just stops, why not show the whole thing until we see the whole moon? oh thats right stage isnt big enough! fuck i laugh at you dreamers that want to beleive this shit!! poor lost souls! yeh they went to the moon, but not in that crappy tin can all we have seen is lies. And fuckheads dop some study, the russians are in on it and now most of the world is too. Its a bigger lie than you lot can imagine.
bjm351 6 months ago
@bjm351 Sooo ignorant! The LM didn't raise high enough to film the whole Moon. It met and docked with the CSM in a comparatively low orbit. Then it was discarded.
But, You are welcome to keep on laughing. At Your own total ignorance...
YDDES 5 months ago
@YDDES lmao!! my ignorance? ok so now you want to say that the CSM was about 90ft off the ground in orbit??? haaa haaaaa god damn your stupid. oh and explain to me EXACTLY `how` it managed to take off from the moon with 8 charges placed on it that wouldve blown it to shit. remember the astronauts couldnt do anything amazing in their footage so its not like the LEM was weightless. the same LEM that left no imprints on the moon. this is fun watching you dig a hole for yourself!!
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 Did I say the film shows the whole way up to the docking? No. I just said: "The LM didn't raise high enough to film the whole Moon".
What " 8 charges placed on it"? What are You talking about? And " remember the astronauts couldnt do anything amazing in their footage so its not like the LEM was weightless. the same LEM that left no imprints on the moon". What does that actually mean???
YDDES 5 months ago
@YDDES You said comparitivley low orbit, which i took as your excuse for the camera cutting off early. My point being that even if it did have to go higher to the CSM theres still absolutely no reason why they couldnt keep filming or at least pan around on the way up to show a different view but no it always moves away from the borders of their set so we cant see beyond the `horizon`. And what do you mean what do i mean? how do you think the they took off from the moon? apart from cables.
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 The camera wasn't manuevered by the astronauts (they had other things to do). It was mounted in the LEM, so it followed its movements. When the LEM tilted, the camera tilted. No "panning", since the whole LEM should have had to swing around to do that. The important thing was to reach the right orbit.
They, of course, took off from Moon by starting the ascent stage's rocket engine. What did You think?
YDDES 5 months ago
@YDDES FAIL. watch the video again. So your saying the camera followed the LEMs movements? well if you gou by that then at one stage the LEM is a 90 degree turn onto its side then filming down at the moon!! wich would mean the LEM would be rocking like hell all over the place and go off course. we know this didnt happen from the outside shot which show it getting pulled straight up and not moving at all. so try again.
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 Wrong. The video showing the Apollo 15 from outside at lift-off, doesn't show when it tilts to gain horisontal speed to insert in orbit. Since the camera couldn't tilt upwards to follow it, the LEM disappears in a few seconds, before the tilt. Check "Apollo15 Lunar Lift-off Lunar Rover Camera".
YDDES 5 months ago
@YDDES you mean the studio camera on the ground?
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 Not worth answering, but I of course mean the camera on the rover. Admitting You were wrong?
YDDES 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@YDDES You said comparitivley low orbit, which i took as your excuse for the camera cutting off early. My point being that even if it did have to go higher to the CSM theres still absolutely no reason why they couldnt keep filming or at least pan around on the way up to show a different view but no it always moves away from the borders of their set so we cant see beyond the `horizon`. And what do you mean what do i mean? how do you think the they took off from the moon? apart from cables.
bjm351 5 months ago
@bjm351 -- It's interesting how ignorant hoax-theory believers are.
There is no possible way to "see the whole moon" with a camera that is only 70 miles away from the moon.
Do some thinking.
Dont' be a sheep.
prosperomage 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bjm351 -- It's interesting how ignorant hoax-theory believers are.
There is no possible way to "see the whole moon" with a camera that is only 70 miles away from the moon.
Do some thinking.
Dont' be a sheep.
prosperomage 5 months ago
Hoaxers can't & won't try and debunk these ascent videos, it's just to hard to do;-)
Tweekerhead 7 months ago
If anyone had a the right to be sceptical of the landing.It would have been the Russians.Come on. Yuri Gargarin even prased them.
MrMic1146 1 year ago
@MrMic1146 i absolutely agree
w580ifan 1 year ago
apollo 14 is mine favorite
w580ifan 2 years ago
Comment removed
cripplewoox 2 years ago
to me this ultimately proves that this was no stage or whatever,it would be totaly impossible to fake such a scene of them vast proportions,i hope this serves a lesson to any would be cts
cripplewoox 2 years ago 5
you are smart
w580ifan 2 years ago
I completely agree with you... the view is uncannily similar to what has been filmed by the latest orbital probe sent to the moon by japan.
One'd have to be too stubburn not to see it.
breeknow 2 years ago