@autumntree2011 - do you also have a good reason for being opposed to race mixing? -
its interesting you said you are not a "fan" of hitler or the KKK
clearly you realize that being against race mixing falls in line with their ideas. Do you have better reasons than they did? Or are you just as insane as them?
@lightandbeautiful - and what are these objective "important qualitative" differences ?
I dont even think you can list a single one of these supposed differences within the parameters you suggest. - and im assuming you have objective reasons because subjective ones are not relevant.
Excuse me but do you even have the slightest clue about what you are saying exists? If so why not go claim your nobel prize.
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate than the word "gay".
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
@Alexdurrant7 'circulation? Lets not get into that game, scientia was in English circles. Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est : And thus knowledge itself is power (Sir Francis Bacon). Whewell used term Science. Newton was doing more than 'modern science'. Newton was a philosopher as well as a 'scientist' haha, how can he be something that didn't exist. He did 'theology'; alchemy, maths...and other sciences. Dennett's distinction is parochial and misleading
When the dust of the modern era settles, Dennett's bust will be on shelves right next to Plato and Aristotle, Kant and Russell, Descarte and Spinoza. Of this I have no doubts.
@autumntree2011 - do you also have a good reason for being opposed to race mixing? -
its interesting you said you are not a "fan" of hitler or the KKK
clearly you realize that being against race mixing falls in line with their ideas. Do you have better reasons than they did? Or are you just as insane as them?
OccamsKatana 3 weeks ago
@lightandbeautiful - and what are these objective "important qualitative" differences ?
I dont even think you can list a single one of these supposed differences within the parameters you suggest. - and im assuming you have objective reasons because subjective ones are not relevant.
Excuse me but do you even have the slightest clue about what you are saying exists? If so why not go claim your nobel prize.
OccamsKatana 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thanks for sharing this video
adelle0001 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people want young white females to mix with non-white males.
I made a one-minute video highlighting a very tiny sample of race-mixing advertisements.
I love white people, and I am opposed to race-mixing. But I do not hate non-whites.
If you click on my name “autumntree2011” highlighted in blue below this comment, you can watch my video.
(I'm not a fan of Hitler or KKK.)
autumntree2011 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate than the word "gay".
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 5 months ago
That "uhm" was infuriating. Get off stage and let him start already.
ZaneArf 6 months ago
Newton not a philosopher? Chair of Natural Philosophy at Cambridge
davdevalle 1 year ago
@davdevalle Science was called natural philosophy when Newton was alive - the word science wasn't yet in circulation.
Alexdurrant7 11 months ago
@Alexdurrant7 'circulation? Lets not get into that game, scientia was in English circles. Nam et ipsa scientia potestas est : And thus knowledge itself is power (Sir Francis Bacon). Whewell used term Science. Newton was doing more than 'modern science'. Newton was a philosopher as well as a 'scientist' haha, how can he be something that didn't exist. He did 'theology'; alchemy, maths...and other sciences. Dennett's distinction is parochial and misleading
davdevalle 11 months ago
And now let's all hear from Dan Dennet...
...
...
...just let me give him a 7 minute introduction first.
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLURRRRRRR
icarus313 1 year ago 2
Damn...easy on Hauser!! He's innocent until proven guilty.
kwalk30 1 year ago
Fuck all introductions!!!!!!!!!!
ashburnhouse 1 year ago 2
he looks like santa clause
hsktoadftw 1 year ago
Whoa, Louis CK lost a lot of weight and confidence.
JiangZiyaTabooDays 1 year ago
Introduced by...uhmm...the uhm-guy.
somor98 1 year ago 11
@somor98 the uhm guy and the alleged liar, to boot. That is what existed in those uhm spaces: the cover-up.
rags847 1 year ago
MU3ral - He might be there, but he'd be horrified to be on that shelf without Darwin being there first!
MikeDrewYT 1 year ago
When the dust of the modern era settles, Dennett's bust will be on shelves right next to Plato and Aristotle, Kant and Russell, Descarte and Spinoza. Of this I have no doubts.
MultiUniv3rsal 1 year ago 2
@MultiUniv3rsal Indeed!
Scofield0085 1 year ago
@MultiUniv3rsal ehhhh, no.
JosephKnight93 1 year ago
Look it's a good lecture thanks for the upload..
But FFS UMMMMM
It had to be said...
I'm gonna count them..
IloveJesusYesId0 2 years ago
dennett starts at 7:00
analord 2 years ago 53
thank you :)
suttung 2 years ago
Thanks for the info!
But I still wonder why your name is so anal..
8DX 2 years ago