Added: 4 years ago
From: nalts
Views: 22,445
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (370)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anonymous are inept douche bags. LULz. They are kids who are wanna~be hackers. Very uneducated, and they don't have the intel. FACTS.

    :)

  • very bad.

  • yup, troll below

  • $cientologists: continue making these movies. We are still winning.

    INFORMATION IS FREE

    We are Anonymous

    We are Legion

    We never forgive

    We never forget

    Expect us

  • @n0possibility YOU'RE NOT SCARING ANYBODY. CUT THE ACT.

  • @gt024 i'm scaring you

  • @n0possibility You could never scare me. I'm from the hood, bitch. I know you got some smart mouth shit to say about that too so bring it.

  • "Hackers on steroids!" Word is that a Hollywood motion picture is going to tell all about them: anonymousthemoviedotcom.

  • Lulz. I'm pro Anonymous and loved this.

    BTW, sixesit, scientology is NOT a religion so how can we suppress it? They call themseves a religion for tax purposes.

  • rofl ur funny dude!! idk im probably anti anonymous AND Anti scientology.....

    i disagree with anons because ppl have the freedom of religion.. and they supress that

    i disagree with scientology because they paractice human trafficking and benifit and feed off the gullable

  • @sixesit I disagree with because $cientololgy is not a religion. It was business until 1990.

  • @analyzingfunny ANONYMOUS IS A CHILD MOLESTATION ORGANIZATION. DON'T TRUST THEM!

  • @gt024 You look a first class troll!

  • @analyzingfunny And you look like a 3rd class whore.

  • @analyzingfunny Quit spying on your sister. You can't have her.

  • ANON WILL WIN

  • @Misha070 LMAO! It is impossible for a loser to win.

  • fuck naltsi bleve in Anonymous

  • fucking troling .. sci fags

  • Pro Anon!

  • lol, thats a great vid (im pro anon btw)

  • silly :)

  • Any anon who can't laugh at this and is getting all butthurt is full of aids and fail.

  • Comment removed

  • It is a humor that you do not understand because anonymous would laugh at the sight of someone who has that stuff in their eyes, well at least the sadists

  • take this as real information?

    why mock u have no understanding just personal issues? u have opened your self up if som1 in this team of fighters wants 2 no you they will find you every main 1 is connected don't take personal issues as a map of how strongly connected this organisation is

    peace and this is for you

  • this was done by a scientology dude.

  • Anonymous isn't organized, it's based on random individuals who want to contribute. And a real Anonymous dude isn't dangerous - they believe in violence free fight, but there are A-holes who dress up like Anons and frighten people, but they aren't anons.

  • what the hell these contradict the real rules

  • as though this were not a serious video or something i mean who outside of candlejack would think suc

  • finally someone took the piss.

  • nalts is a cock

  • I pick 5! :P

  • Anon is not amused.

    But I am.

  • scienstologys

  • Lulz i liked it anyway

  • i pick group 7)

    this means im not a faggot that partakes in fail-filled scientology raids, and im still an anon.

    not a faggoty 4ailchanner, not a fucktard memespouter; an anon.

  • haha

  • We are anonymous we are....um...what were we again? Oh yeah, i know what we do! We write yaoi!

  • hahahahaha damn funny

  • I'm not one of your subscribers Nalts and I think the idea behind Anonymous is good, but I have to say this video is a really great spoof on Anonymous' videos. Make more quality stuff like this and maybe you will get me as a subscriber one day.

  • Funny.

  • 95 percent of the world doesn't know who we are anyway... lulz...

  • @Anon9023 99.9999999999999999999% is my guess

  • I totally agree with Rule 5. Those masks get hot.

  • LOL. TANG GOES WHRE?

  • anonymous is win. lulz.

  • too lite. sorta funny, but not that funny. scifucks will fuck your world. then laughing stops. then you'll think: shoulda paid better attention to the criminal organization calling itself a church. do your own research.

  • @noliarz ANONYMOUS IS A CHILD MOLESTATION ORGANIZATION. DON'T TRUST THEM!

  • @noliarz For all those who have never been in the church, check it out for yourself. Don't believe the rants of intolerant, masked klan members.

  • @gt024 i know wtf $cientology is FIRSTHAND. i dont need to "believe" anything. im a disbeliever on all levels. this is what keeps my opinions CORRECT.

  • what douches right lol cant remember more than 7 rules asses

  • that was so funny!! i cant believe that the cult of scientology, was doing comedy.LOL!!!!!!!

  • Ohhhhh i am 5) Amused and perplexed, cuz totally I'll bring heaps of tang and it'll be like....orange.... cuz orange tang crystals look nice cuz they are orange not yellow.... yellow is a ugly colour... yess throwing orange tang crystals is very amusing... did i say i like unicorns.... sorry i'm feeling random and hyper

  • I must say lolz.

  • OMG. I peed my pants! This it tooo funny.

  • Oh my gosh, I am cracking up!

  • Lulz.

  • What's that thing at the end?...

  • Is there a "none of the above" option?

    So, Tang is the Scientologist's weakness?

    I KNEW IT!!!

  • Haha, gotta say, Pro Anonymous! But I don't want to end up in a ditch somewhere due to Xenu so shhh :p

    I wanted to go to the London and film it, but couldn't afford to go again this month :( Can't wait to see what happened at any of the protests XD

  • haha "there is no rule number 4 yet"

  • no.... i have water!!

  • this is gay.

  • Aw, Nalts.

  • I am ANTI SCIENTOLOGY! Im so glad your talking about this because scientology is fucking evil!!!

  • Ok.....?

  • Tastey Taaaannnnng. Yeah...my memory's not that good either...

  • Fair enough. Thanks for the exchange. And good luck on the 10th.

  • One of my main points has been that we DON'T get a wide variety of opinion on YouTube (in videos or comments) from anons regarding the acceptability of hacking people's accounts, threatening critics, etc. Many anons have been great with me in discussion -- as you have been -- but the number who are willing to explicitly disapprove of the hacking of critics' accounts etc. can be counted on one hand. That makes for a pretty well-supported generalization.

  • Whether such hypothetical murderers were real anons or not, the point is that the collective would (I believe; this is just my opinion) strongly dissociate itself from the act. It would work hard to persuade the public that, to use your words, "Anon does not condone murder for free speech never has never will." I don't hear you or any other anon making comparable statements about hacking strong critics' accounts, distributing people's personal information over the Internet, death threats, etc.

  • I assume (I hope correctly) that if a group of anons committed a serious act of violence (e.g., murder) against a harsh critic of Anonymous, and did so IN THE NAME OF ANONYMOUS, that Anonymous would publicly disassociate itself from the act in no uncertain terms, and strongly condemn it. Here I assume you would NOT say: "We are not each others' keeper, or mother...[and that these sorts of things] "are at each persons discretion and whatever morals guide them."

  • If that's right, why for murder, but not for hacking people's accounts, issuing death threats, distributing people's private information over the Internet, etc? Because, while a murder carried out in the name of Anonymous would set in motion an enormous amount of activity within the collective which would result in a public condemnation of the act, hacking people's accounts (death threats, distributing their personal info, etc.) does not. That says something about the nature of the collective.

  • The sort of retaliation people expect in response to harsh criticism of groups like republicans and democrats (the criticism of racial/ethnic groups is too close to hate speech to be apt here) etc. is just more SPEECH. That's why people feel safe doing it.

    Not so with Anonymous. That's why you don't see many people being critical of Anon here on YouTube, either in comments and videos (though the numbers are slowly growing). They don't feel safe doing it.

  • YOU USED GARAGE BAND!

    ha

    love it!

  • OK, so I assume that when someone VERBALLY attacks Anon, and some anons respond by hacking into that person's account, getting their phone number, making death threats, etc., that many anons (maybe thousands) will feel that's morally inappropriate. Many such anons will understand that, because people don't want their accounts hacked or their personal info distributed over the Internet without their permission, they will be reluctant to exercise their free-speech right to criticize Anon.

  • After all, when the public sees several examples of what CAN happen when one harshly criticizes Anonymous, it gets burned into their brains what can be "expected" of "non-forgiving" Anonymous if they themselves dare to be strongly critical. A question I'd be grateful if you'd answer is this: Why don't lots of Anons whose moral compass is rattled by this sort of behavior speak out against it? We in the public don't hear from them. Indeed, the silence is quite deafening. Can you explain this?

  • A question of clarification: If a "personal" attack on Anonymous involved nothing more than WORDS, SOUNDS, and IMAGES on a YouTube video, say -- strong criticism, but what commonly is included under one's right to free speech -- would Anonymous' "swift and relentless retaliation" go beyond free speech (hacking accounts, exposing one's personal details, etc.)?

    You see, if there is a reasonable likelihood of that happening, people will be intimidated to express criticism of Anonymous.

  • bahaha throw tang in the face of any scientologist if they get in your face!

  • This video amuses me greatly.Also, note the lack of retaliation by Anonymous -- I suspect they are amused as well.

  • lol

  • Did you see the fly go by? I did. LOL.

  • Haahaha , you guys better show up with really good shoes on feb 10th, so we can tell the difference.

    feb 10th , 11:00 AM

    your local "church" of Scientology

  • This just feels right! Love it!

  • Hahahaha!!! Anonymous LITE, I love it, I'm IN!!

  • How's your hampster doing?

  • Wear good shoes? Better get a new pair of crocs then. oh wait

  • Yeah that's it Kevin cash in

  • guess I gotta go get some tang, thanks for the tips!

  • what have you done Nalts.

  • _only_ seven rules? there's only 2 rules, and most have trouble remembering those

  • im in group 5

    i don't understand any of this

  • So Nalts...will there be doughnuts?

  • PUNCH AND PIE!!

  • I forgot what side I'm on.

  • sugar don't bite

  • hahah AWESOME

  • I donno sounds like anarchy to me.  I wonder if there will be doughnuts? I bet Hubbard's group have doughnuts.

  • No the Dark Side have cookies. ( oh and the cake is a lie.)

  • ...and maybe that guy in the van really did have some tasty candy :)

  • Fuck those Anonymous losers. Their only rule is that they are all nerdy /b/retards. Funny shit though, Nalts, haha.

  • tehehehehe. im so confused....

  • I live my life by Rule #6!!!

    " Wear good shoes. They should look fabulous even if they are not comfortable."

    So does that mean I am 1 or 2 or maybe I am 7? wait, what was 7...

  • They made a Britney one...i didn't get it like this one... *0)

  • just tell us all when to start drinking the kool-aide

  • Why not stop all the scary shit? Even if it's for laughs, the public doesn't know that. And if the harassment, bullying, and suppression of free speech continues, the public will never accept that it's "just for lulz." The anonymity is great; as is using the Internet with intelligence and humor to do what's never been done before. But what's the point of intimidating an enormous public who might otherwise support you? (For those who don't give a shit about public support: ignore this.)

  • The public cares very deeply about preserving and protecting its right to free speech.

    It will do so by exercising that right of free speech.

    Out here in the public sphere the game is very different.

  • Sign me up!

  • NALTS' CHANNEL HAS BEEN HACKED.

    If there are any anons who strongly object to this suppression of free speech through intimidation and bullying -- particularly anons who seek public support for current and future campaigns -- how about speaking out loudly against this?

  • mail me and make yourself a little clearer

  • Awesome vid.  Glad someone finally parodied these guys.

  • We are the Internet users of the world

    We are legion (2007 estimate 1.3 billion; see internetworldstats d o t c o m)

  • hmmm And you arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

  • creature speakers, excellent choice!

  • rule 34 on nalts, NOW!!! lol jk jk kthnx

  • Anonymous has moved from intimidation to harassment and bullying (in the manner of Scientology).

    NALTS' CHANNEL HAS BEEN HACKED.

  • There already are several parodies around.. look up "Gaynonomous Attacks" or "Message to Anonymous from a Scientology Believer" for examples. ^___^

  • Anonymous - Lawful Evil

    Scientology - Chaotic Good

    Nalts - Neutral Good

  • ahh fuck. i can't believe i've done this.

    it should be

    Anonymous - Chaotic Good

    Scientology - Lawful Evil

    Nalts - Neutral Good

  • EntertainedWatcher FTW!!!

  • lol, pussy.

  • Idid, it didn't say anything.

    Be Well..

  • I lol'd hard.

  • Tom Cruise must REALLY HATE YOU Nalts. lol. Another good video 5 stars!

  • what is this all about??

  • So how long did it take you to type the description?

  • Ahhh that was wicked funny.

  • trying to hard to be funny.

    not cool nalts.

  • Now they'll be coming for you. They disappeared me & now I can't even find my car, let alone myself...

  • It's kind of ironic, because anyone who goes is basically living up to Scientology belief that all non-Scientologists are spectators.

  • Hmmmm...you were in Florida recently. Did some Scientologist from Clearwater slip something into your water bottle, or are you a YouTube spy?

  • That was really good, you on to something, Nalts...

  • haha halarious, ill be responsible for batteries (CALL IT!)

  • Go Nalts! Deliver the video lulz of the picket for the good of mankind!

  • Wow...

    That was pretty much made of awesome..

    In my pants

  • We'll have fun with you nalts. You shouldnt have made this video.

  • "We'll have fun with you nalts. You shouldnt have made this video." -blazedup06

    Typical Scientology-like intimidation meant to suppress free speech.

  • .......Volunteer huh?

  • I'll take my chances.

  • Copy that. Anonymous Lite is ready to proceed.

  • Im all into anonymous now...before i saw this.Not good...

  • ROFL!! This is hilarious!

    They may be already hacking their way into your garage as I type this. It should make great video material. :-P

    Moosie

  • Funny but tread carefully, Anon never forgets...

  • anon is going to troll the bejesus out of you...but atleas you'll get views amirite? thats what its all about

  • Another intresting video!!!

  • :D It's creepy how you and I watch the same videos in nearly the same time. O.o Nalts is stalking my subscription list!!! he he he

  • lol

  • LOL loved it! "there is no rule number 4 yet"

  • i want victory to be mine.

    --how do i do that, just follow the 7 rules?

    ==== i'm definitely needing some victory.

    so if i follow them all the time, will i attain to a constant state of victory?

    i'd better get started!!

    see ya later NALTS,

    XEM

  • It worked, you brainwashed me!

  • I forget what was rule #1?

  • Wear underwear

  • Surely not, that takes the fun out of everything.

  • HILARIOUS

  • Loved rule # 4

  • Praise for the ChurchofNalts!

  • Join me and defeat the haters! My church has no rules except for the complete devotion to and worshiping of the YouTuber known as Nalts.

    PS-Where's my cheese?

  • OMG the cheeeeese!

  • I read the wiki on Scientology just yesterday... I don't know what to comment without getting myself in trouble with people who might find this video :)

  • "Odd," isn't it, that there's no Wikipedia article on Anonymous (though there is one on their campaign against Scientology, "Project Chanology").