Added: 1 year ago
From: CJCA915
Views: 72,076
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (347)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what i never understood when i watched the film,and having a good grasp of the star trek principle concerning shield configurations,was why there was no envelope or "bubble" effect when the BOP torpedoes struck the Enterprise.They appeared to hit the hull even with shields raised.

  • Can you work on new special effects for Star Trek V? Please?

  • no contest to what they did in the movie with models.

  • @spacexploder Obviously... however, since my skills have improved in the last year, I may give this another go...

  • Considering the original battle was made by ILM with a huge amount of resources at their disposal, this is great.

    Excellent job, bud!

  • First question, what programs did you use to model this?

    Second question, are you currently in school?

    I am pretty sure that if you gave credit to the actual movie, you would then be freed from DMCA issues so long as you are using this as a demo-reel.

    As for this clips quality, not bad. Again, anyone making comments need to know more before doing so. What programs were you using, how long you have been using them, and how many render computers you had access to. (and more questions.)

  • @RobertGraphics I didn't make the models, model credits are at the end, however, I believe the Enterprise was made in Lightwave, then converted to 3ds max to which I use.

    I'm not in school, nor have I ever been, at least for this.

    Even then, I've still been given a copyright strike for a video.

  • TempesetFeir = Wanna be Trekkie that's seen Voyager maybe TNG, a little of DS9 and all of Enterprise, but not the original or the first 6 movies. Yes TF, there were actually 10 movies before the 2009 StarTrek Movie, the one in question is number 6

  • Great job:)

  • Considering you did this your self as opposed to a huge group of tech nerds that had hundreds of thousands of dollars backing them, I'd say you did a FANTASTIC job. Some shots I had to say were as equal as to those scene in the actual movie. Great job!!!

  • you even copied the static shot(it was wobbling in the scene before) of the bop beening shot that everyone groned about in the cinema. hehe nice :)

  • What makes this bad? Fast editing using the interior bridge, torps arnt graphically right & do not go through shields that easily, Klingons cant fire when cloaked or recloak that fast. You had too few shots for this battle. .NO phaser or disruptor part of the battle. Trek is not about torpedos.... AND finally need to show torpedo explosions per battle dmg on hull of the enterprise. (besides that last one) to be or not to be is a meaningless quotation.

  • @TempestFeir The shots I created were only the VFX shots... as using too much of the movie dialogue results quite often in DMCA strikes...

    The way the torpedoes were done in STVI was using a laser pointer... I don't have the ability to do such an effect, at least at this time.

    Have you seen Star Trek VI? A group of conspiring Klingon's developed a BoP that could fire while cloaked...

  • @TempestFeir

    Wow man. You seem like a total fool for saying a Klingon ship can't fire while cloaked. It was a major plot point in star trek 6. Don't you feel totally stupid now.

  • @TempestFeir Have you ever seen ST VI?

    This wa s a great clip. Before you criticize so harshly, lets see what you can do, then we'll talk.

  • @TempestFeir You're quite pedantic for someone who can't even be bothered to learn what the video IS.

  • @TempestFeir I suggest you watch the ACTUAL movie, before criticizing the level of quality to this clip. Your not exactly accurate with much of your post.

    As to the clip in question, i'd say the animations are pretty spot-on.

  • @TempestFeir Who says ST isn't about torpedos? And the BoP from ST6 can fire while cloaked.

    To make a long story short: You are an idiot! Sadly CJCA915 responded to you an therefore gave your bullshit posting a place in the front row.

  • @TempestFeir phasers need a lock on, they cant be fired with manual targetting without lots of calibrations, torps can be fired manually and this is from the flims it was a modified briel that can fire while cloaked. Since it was cloaked they could not target with phasers only manual fire torps. Cant remember why their shields were not raised but thats startrek for you they were almost non existent in DS9.

  • @TempestFeir I suggest you watch the film mate. The Klingons developed a bird of prey that could fire whilst cloaked. Christs sake, the films TWENTY years old plus, where have you been ??!!

    ;-D

  • @nealster1972 LOL. I think the sayng goes " look before you leap"

  • @TempestFeir Watch Star Trek VI before trying to Smash this guy's vid !!! (Nice vid CJCA915)

  • @TempestFeir try watching star trek 6 ffs

  • That was pretty creavtive....good job

  • THis was so awesome. If I had money I would hire you...twice.

  • Great!! Realy good job!!

  • you know your a geek when you find yourself watching this lol.

  • Awesome! Nice job! :)

  • I don't know why people are complaining that was awsome. I could never do anything like that I AM very impressed sir

  • It's funny these ships don't move at all when they're hit - 0:58, 1:19. At 0:34 there don't appear to be any stars as there are before and after.

  • @davenielsen78 There are stars, you have to watch it in 720p and full screen... if you've seen the movie, you'd know they don't move... on impacts.

  • @CJCA915 I have seen the movie, so I know they do move when they're hit - as they did in every single one of the movies and every one of the ST TV series. And, no, there aren't any stars there.

  • @davenielsen78 I know there are stars... as I made it.

  • Dude they having Shilds...

    Nice video anyway

  • @Duijnkiller Dude, yes they did, but they weren't depicted in Star Trek VI.

  • @Duijnkiller this is how the movie went... besides a bird of pray does not have shields while cloaked.

  • Its great but it jumps around too much and the music transitions make my stress go up.

  • @dewpoint88 Well, if I wouldn't be at risk of DMCA strikes from Paramount, I would of added the dialogue into it...

  • @CJCA915 Yeah...I don't fully understand what one can do for fairuse and fan made things but the voices and what not would be great and I'm sure you have thought of it. Its funny how "they" would not like that stuff and yet it only supports the actual Star Trek product.

  • @dewpoint88 Well, one would think such usage would be fair use if credits are given... but it seems like Paramount/CBS want their money... I mean I've contacted Paramount on at least half a dozen occasions, telling them I'm not profiting from these videos... but still, I get a DMCA... not as much as I used to... but nevertheless.

    Just finished this project:

    /watch?v=B4JvGbJIdNU

    TMP: Drydock Tour, I added the character shots into this one...

  • @CJCA915 That spacedock flyby is super cool. I give it a 10/10. It really captured the feeling of the original. Do that with the Khitomer, I know they are different scenes, and you will have an awesome project done. Do you consider the spacedock scene finished or are you still working on it? I would have a few small ideas.

  • @dewpoint88 The tour itself is done... but now I'm working on the departure...

  • NICE

  • That was pretty nice, I'd like to see more battles like this one, like maybe some of the battles from one of the series or the classic ones from the movies.

  • what a load of shit this is

  • @CIeave Let me see you do better...

  • dude, your attention to detail, namely Enterprise's torpedo launchers warming up at about 0:15 is awesome.  Keep rocking.

  • Excellent rendering work for sure.

  • Not bad. The cutting of the music messes it up a bit, and the bird of prey looks far too rigid in the explosion at the end.

  • Nicely done!

  • this is just the movie edited

  • @WesAMV7569 Erm, no... -_- anyone comparing this to shots of the movie will clearly see that...

  • @CJCA915 i have the movie, since i was a kid iv probably watched it 10 times, the only difference is that the voices have been moved out of the time sequence and edited in

  • @WesAMV7569 It's a CG recreation... obviously... so if you're just trying to troll, then go away...

  • @WesAMV7569 Yes, It's a CG recreation of the scenes, I can tell. I've seen the original probably about 15-20 times. Even if I saw it once or a few times I'd be able to tell, from having seen all 11 star trek movies more than once. He recreated the scenes using a cg program. so yeah. I think you need to watch the movie again and compare the vids, and if you still thing it's the exact same thing then the original, then you must have bad eyesight. 

  • @CJCA915 Heh, if you think about it his attempt to troll is a good complement.

  • @DoctorMeh Compliment. But how so? This really is very bad.

  • @davenielsen78 What is very bad?

  • @CJCA915 It's CG but very bad CG.

  • @mrjjking77 Let me see you do something better... fuck off.

  • @WesAMV7569 You're a moron.

  • @WesAMV7569 Are you kidding? They look nothing alike.

  • What software did you use to make this?

  • @RAYMOND96195 I used 3D Studio Max for the renderings, After Effects for the compositing, and Premiere for the editing...

  • very good!

  • Cry Havoc!! and let's slip the dogs of war!!!

  • At 1:01, Here it comes, right up your ass!!!!

  • The 38 Klingon crew members of the Bird of Prey have apparently visited this video... they disagreed with the ending.

  • awesome i love it !

    

  • You made this? way cool

  • @rex669 I did.

  • The curs are really ... really rough. Its a pity, the CG is pretty good.

  • AVAST THE DOGS OF WAR !!!! , kirk FIRE!!!

  • @jeenormus:  That's "Cut loose the dogs of war," but I appreciate the sentiment just the same.

    Great CGI recreation. The BoP remained too motionless as it was exploding but this remains awesome.

  • I think the Bird of Prey was a little out gunned.

  • Not bad!!!!!!

  • Nice work on the camera angles!

  • Tagged teamed the Klingon !

  • You gave the Enterprise a hell of a lot more damage than it really took.

  • @Squire1017A On the contrary, I based each impact mark off the movie...

  • @CJCA915

    You should have dared him to make one better.

  • Its at at 1 min and 30 seconds it dosen't have that damage mark on the starbord near the shuttle bay.

  • Way to rushed, shields were missing from both ships, the one torpedo that was supposed to glance off the dorsal section of the saucer hit instead.

  • @Sunburn2007 Have you seen the movie?

  • @CJCA915 Probably in the area of 120 times.

  • @Sunburn2007 Well, then you should know this represents almost exactly like the movie.

  • @CJCA915 LOL...if you say so.

  • @Sunburn2007 I did alter some angles, but the effects are made to match the movie.

  • Guess I will never know why the shields dont worked... btw good work!

  • Beautiful! Nice work.

  • A for effort, C for exceution.  Keep trying, though. It's a good start.

  • ships cant fire when they are cloaked

  • @ownage4561 Apparently you haven't seen Star Trek VI...

  • @ownage4561 "ships cant fire when they are cloaked" Perhaps the dumbest comment on a Star trek video... EVAH!!!

  • @ownage4561 'This one can.' - Spock

  • @aussieivan The cloaking device was introduced very near the beginning of TOS (Balance of Terror). Kirk and Spock stole the technology in "The Enterprise Incident", got it going in minutes. Used it once. And then the Federation never used it again. And, because the prototype-equipped ship couldn't fire when cloaked in BoT, everyone in the 23rd century assumes that the tech could never possibly advance, & would always be exactly like the prototype. How did these bozo's ever develop warp drive?

  • @sbergman27 Well, the Federation agreed not to develop cloaking technology, which is why Admiral Pressman was placed under arrest in TNG for hiding that 'phasing cloak.'

    Well, most people use the very fact that the cloaking device took enormous power, and the Klingon's aren't notorious for keeping up... I mean they used Birds of Prey all the way into DS9...

  • @CJCA915 "the Federation agreed not to develop cloaking technology"

    Yes, in 2311, 44 years after Kirk stole 1 that they had installed & working quite nicely in a few minutes without seeming to strain the original NCC-1701's resources badly. & the Romulans seem to like their cloaks just fine decade after decade. It just doesn't make sense. Maybe Starfleet is just too moral to skulk around the galaxy invisibly.. using the iCloak they swiped from the poor Romulan commander whose career they ruined.

  • @sbergman27 iCloak? LMAO!

  • @CJCA915 Well, portable devices were just larger in those days:

    tinyurlDOTcom/6pbbxc7

    tinyurlDOTcom/7677lny

    tinyurlDOTcom/75vbynq

  • Why didnt they just roll a window down and look around, when the bird of pray fired they could see her.. ;)

  • @jimmypop1222 Cuz cloaks don't work that way. They not only make an object invisible to sensors, but visually as well. See: Star Trek IV" The Voyage Home and the Deep Space Nine season 7 episode, 'The Emperor's New Cloak' for confirmation.

  • @TheTVTastic it was a joke, (roll down a window)????

  • @jimmypop1222 I knew you weren't serious about rolling down the window but the notion that if you just "look" out a window instead of using sensors, you can see a cloaked ship has been floated before. But, yeah, I'm no scientist but something tells me that rolling down a window on a starship would be a bad idea for a variety of reasons. :P

  • @jimmypop1222 What I could never understand was that if the thing had a "tail pipe" why couldn't Enterprise's sensors see it? Why did Spock and McCoy (of all people) have to rig up a photon torpedo with special equipment they just happened to have on board?

  • @sbergman27 good point the Torpedo could so why couldnt the ship, Again they should have just rolled down the window stuck there head out and looked lol.

  • @jimmypop1222 The cloak plot device has always been somewhat problematic, except for Balance of Terror. Balance of Terror had it's problems but was a brilliant story of two seasoned captains, far from home, engaged in a battle of wits. One of them had doubts about what he was fighting for. The rest of the cloak episodes have used it as a trivial plot device. Hey! Look! Their cloak has this or that flaw! (even visible to the naked eye!) Engineers of the 23rd century seem really stupid.

  • Budget restraints were always a problem with Star Trek. On one hand, they had excellent special effects, but would cut corners by reusing the same scenes and shots over and over. Paramount used to be pretty cheap when it came to Star Trek until Nemesis and the last movie.

  • @jakfuki There wasn't too terribly much of that. They spent enough on "Leaving Drydock" in ST:TMP to reuse the footage in TWoK. (Complete with the olympic class backflip.) And Regula 1 is the orbital office complex from ST:TMP filmed upside down. But other than that, most special effects were one time footage.

  • @sbergman27 Of course they were cheap, and reused the same effects. Just because they spent a lot of money on the drydock scenes from TMP doesn't mean they should have used the same scenes again for TWOK, Some of the TMP shots of the Enterprise cruising along were used in TWOK. TFF used drydock shots from TVH, and Generations used a few shots from TUC. Paramounbt is cheap, and reusing stock footage for their premiere franchise really sucks.

  • @jakfuki Look. I'm a lot more interested in the quality of the story and the quality of acting than in whether they reused special effects. I've payed quite a lot of attention to these movies over the years, and certainly noticed "Leaving Drydock". But not the "cruising along" scenes. Maybe they did. But if I didn't notice, it must have been done reasonably well. Did you watch these movies "first run"? I did. If cutting a few corners bought them Ricardo Mantalbán, I'm cool with that.

  • @pastramipete, @Doomsday971 All right guys. check out my channeI...I put together a video of the battle from the original movie (In HD too) and at the 3:25 to 3:27 mark Scotty says "Shields weakening!!" and you can see how far the shields are from the hull...and and 4:20 the field becomes yellow and Scotty yells "SHIELDS COLLAPSING!!" so you guys have an idea of why I'm so puzzled...

  • @hitmantv41 Well, the visual representation doesn't necessarily mean the shields are that far from the hull...

  • Nemesis was the same way...

  • @CJCA915 ILM always has a thing of playing with the shields when they want drama. I never understood how a ship with shields up is damaged? What is the point of them if your ship is internally exploding? Looks like hull polarized shields. Just a let down to me

  • @Megatron65 "I never understood how a ship with shields up is damaged? "

    Energy leakage. If you think that any defensive mechanism is 100% effective you are living in a dreamworld. A small percentage of destructive energy gets through. And packs a hell of a punch. The real question is how does a ship with impaired shields survive at all?

  • @sbergman27 Wouldn't the vacuum of space be a factor? I am sure I remember an episode of NG where Data explains that energy what'ever its form is sucked out and dispersed when exposed or something along these lines! I guess the Ships hull is strong enough at the end of the day and I am sure they line them with an element of Concrete or something similar to reinforce them have a look at the tech manuals I am I read that with the Hull description for the Ent D!

  • @CJCA915 Nemesis is a floating turd passing itself off as a feature film. It should not be mentioned when discussing STVI:TUC. Nemesis should only be mentioned when discussing such classic films as Battlefield Earth and Larry The Cable Guy's Delta Farce.

  • @TheTVTastic I liked Nemesis overall, Data dying is what ticked me off, but hey, B4 left a huge cliffhanger.

  • @CJCA915 It's not so much that Data died that ticked me off it's that they reduced the character to nothing more than a bunch of information that can be transferred from one computer to another, thus completely shattering 15 years of character development beginning with S2's 'Measure of a Man' where the writers told us that Data was a sentient living being and not just the sum of his parts and experiences. That and the story was awful and the dialogue was ridiculous.

  • @CJCA915 You saw my video? Hmm...touche' never thought of it that way...well thanks for discussion none the less to everyone and thanks to everyone for not giving me a hard time or flaming me! you all have class! =)

  • @hitmantv41 Didn't find your video.

  • I wondered how come they just don't start firing phasers the moment a torpedo was fired from the Klingons

  • @stargazerblue186 Budget...

  • @CJCA915 Are you saying they had something bigger in mind for this scene but had to cut down because of budget? Only time we saw the enterprise A use phasers was in the wrath of khan, after that is was all about the torpedoes. Would of liked to have scene the Enterprise A in a more action base scene.

  • @smileygabe22 Possibly... effects come down to budget, which is why in Wrath of Khan, they reused the drydock sequence from The Motion Picture.

  • in Khitomer is enterprise C,  star trek tng

  • Very nicely done. :)

  • Chang: "I am constant as the Northern star.."

    Dr. McCoy: "I'd give real money if he'd shut up."

  • I was wondering how come when the Enterprise gets hit by torpedoes the hull just gets hit and you see hull damage? I mean in the later years when ships fire phasers on each other you see the phasers hit shields....is it because shielding is way significantly better in later years? i'm a newbie when it comes to being a Trekkie

  • @hitmantv41 I'm not even sure, the Enterprise has shields... however, that doesn't explain the damage marks from shot 1, lol.

  • @CJCA915 no shields? but in the wrath of kahn the ent and reliant had shields..

  • @CJCA915 probably just for "effect"

  • @CJCA915 Yeah seriously..I mean I would understand after a couple of shots and the shields are weakened but when the shield strength is still pretty healthy? =\

  • @hitmantv41 often starships will run without their shields up in order to conserve energy, energy that can be used for other uses like scanners or engines. And because Klingon vessels use cloaking devices the Enterprise wouldn't have known to raise its shields until it was attacked.

  • @hitmantv41 The shield system in the "kirk" era was not so advanced as the one on Picard

    In the kirk era the shild was almost on the surface of the ship, later on was expanded to form a "bubble" as you can see in the rest of the star trek saga

  • @whatthafuckisthis Ah thanks, I've been wondering this for years..I wonder what the "science" is behind both era's shields!

  • @hitmantv41 I haven't seen the film in a long time, but I remember if you look close in one shot you see the shields flickering, sparking. It's almost as if this generation of shields are tighter, closer against the ship's hull like a second skin as opposed The Next Generation era where it's like a big bubble around the ship.

  • @pastramipete seems to be the common answer..but I got Star Trek VI and been watching the good parts...and in the battle I do recall the flickering part..but screens showing shield strength display the shields surrounding the ship and they look pretty thick..it's blue and after numerous hits it becomes yellow at one part then when Scotty yells "SHIELDS COLLAPSING!!!!" the entire field on the screens become yellow and start flashing..I gotta upload the battle to show what I mean..

  • @hitmantv41 Think of it this way, Enterprise (NX-01) had polarized hull plating. Think of it like magnetizing the hull to deflect weapons. The Enterprise here had shields but not strong enough to set it up away from the ship, much like a superficial skin. TNG and on has stronger shields that can extend out from the ship. At least thats how I always understood it.

  • @pastramipete  Also in Star Trek V when the shuttle craft was going in for a crash landing in the shuttle bay...they had the lower shields and the shields surrounded the Enterprise at a pretty good distance and when they lowered shields it came down in layers..anyone else know what I'm talking about?

  • I actually like some of your angles better than the orignal.

  • "I'd give real money if he'd shut up"

  • i thought the enterprise was lost at kitimer?

  • @dafyddlewis89 No...

  • @CJCA915 Please dont doubt my love for the trek, my memory just sucks so bad. So when was it that the enterprise came through time and met picard then went back and got destroyed?

    Nice vid aswel, loving all of the trek scenes coming out, next step is fan made films hopefully!

  • @dafyddlewis89 You're thinking of the TNG episode 'Yesterday's Enterprise', which details the Enterprise-C, not the Enterprise-A as is shown in this clip.

  • @CJCA915 LMAO funny was he joking?

  • @dafyddlewis89

    I think you are confused with the Enterprise C, which was destroyed at the Klingon outpost Narendra III.

  • @dafyddlewis89 USS Enterprise 1701C

  • @dafyddlewis89 watch: star trek the undiscovered country. the 1701-A was taken out of service..later the 1701-B was launched

  • @dafyddlewis89 where did you get that from? Kittimer was where Worf's father, Morg died. It was a Romulan attack on a Klingon outpost.

  • Kirk: WHERE'S THAT DAMN TORPEDO?!?!?!???!

  • @hitmantv41 McCoy: "She's READY, JIM! LOCK AND LOAD!"

  • @TheKansasCowboy ::Kirk stands up clenching his fist with indescribable fury:: Fire!

  • @hitmantv41 *the torpedo launches from its bay, streaking through space desperately searching for its target and then... it finds it.. Chang: "To Be or not to be.." (BOOM)

  • @TheKansasCowboy

    Sulu: Target that explosion and fire!

    :: Excelsior fires two torpedoes ::

    Kirk: Fire!!! ::Enterprise hurls two torpedoes::

    ::The Bird of Prey bounces with each torpedo strike and KA-BOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!:: =P

  • I can appreciate that this would have taken time and skill to do, but i wonder why do it all? The original looks better.

  • @azraelbum The point is taking a stab at doing it... not about trying to make it look better, no CG can ever match that of studio models.

  • @CJCA915 Yeah i see your point. Maybe if you do another you could the battle at Narendra III with the Enterprise C

  • @azraelbum Possibly.

  • BRAVO!!!! Very awesome work!

  • Very nice work, especially (as you suggested) in HD.

  • This was better than most of the bullshit made by the official companies.

    WHOO =D

  • uss excelsior & enterprise at the end, an epic clip

  • Nice. Wow.

  • really well done

  • i think it was pretty good job, at matching the movie, but the death of the klingon's always sucked for 2 reasons, (and hoped you had fixed in your remake) 1. the rocking effect as it was being hit. that just throws it off from looking like its in space but more like being held by a string. 2. even tho it was rocking it just stops to blow up. i always felt they could have done a simple camera movement to at least match up. but I still love the movie and enjoyed your video

  • Having seen the original many times, I'm impressed with how much nuance you got into the renderings. A lot of the finest details of the original models' movement are there. Well done.

  • I liked it CJ. I liked how your close shots of the torpedoes, good job. Can't wait to see your newer version.

  • good effort, but the originals were so much better