Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the more this guy keeps speaking the more white people will join the KK or neo nazis.

  • hate speeches are not hate crime. People make hate speech all the time and under the law they have the right to so. The white power organizations make hate speech in public all the time. Please don't blur the right to hate to hate crime.

  • @samooia Listen I did not make the hate crime law. It is a new law passed that says if one incites another to commit a crime that is based on prejudice hate etc it can be prosecuted as hate crime. See my set of videos reading the text of that law and discussing it. This video I made in showing that it is inequally applied. Under the new hate crime legislation this guy should be prosecuted. I do not agree with much of that new bill. It wanders into constitutional violation.

  • It's not the whites. IT'S THE JEWS!!! They are pitting whites against blacks and making all the money.

  • @iamopinionated123 the point here is that this was broadcast nationally and he was not prosecited which indicates to me is was used as propoganda. COuld be pittig races for civil riots war etc. He needs a good counselor.

  • this is what i think.. Kamau said they are searching for the one PERSON WHO WILL GET THE "IDEA" of "HOW" we are going to do... murder is out of the question.. we do not have the nuclear,and bombs at our disposal..but there are "other" ways..and they are making sure nobody unlocks the "truth"............. so to speak... he said we need to exterminate white people..yes, but he doesnt know how..cus its not murder..so people need to think about that.

  • @IAzarel You should look up what conspiracy to commit crime is and what solicitattion of a crime is.

  • @combatvetlawstudent hey, after some serious sitting back, i dont agree in the extermination of any man or any race, im not to judge on whom deserves to lose his physical form of life..... honestly..disregard past posts..

  • that's right brother.  Kill them all, better world without them.

  • Thats pure racism!!!!!! why wasting that hating other races when we can learn so much of them?

    My father is white, my mother has also african and white blood. if you were going to kill me wich part of me would you kill? The legs? because i also have white blood...thats stupid! you're just a black Adolf Hitler. To bad you're not white with blond hair and blue eyes, cause he would love you!

  • yea maybe you could tell that to the authorities who have let this guy get by with such madness. Makes me wonder if they are not trying to start a civil war. The new hate crime bill and this guy is put out world wide getting by with saying such horrible things. Ya know?

  • I dont even feel sorry for that guy because his not worth it, but he REALLY needs medical help!

  • Great video! I'll give you another example of hypocrisy; in reports about the murder of David Kao where they omit the detail that Cory Azor and Chris Levy are Black, people who claim to be Black say they are disgusted that racist Jews killed an Asian. When they see they are Black suddenly race had nothing to do with it and I'm racist for pointing out that they are Black. When they think Whites did it, it's racist. When they see Blacks did it, it's not racist.

  • I do not think that white people should be exterminated at all ! But I see that you like to block anyone who disagrees with you ! By you blocking people you are just creating more of the idea of double standards.

    You should talk it out with people !

    But yes I do think non whites at times get away with killing people who are white ! Yes that is a double standard, but in today's society non white racial groups do not have power. Whites are the ones in charge, and so forth.

  • The reason I blockis because I have terorists that visit these videos and leave horrible comments. They are praising the shooter and etc. I dont have time to visit my videos every day to go and remove such madness so while some people may not agree with pending approval I am happy to stop terrorists from getting their evil ideas on my videos.

  • wait are you UncookedVanilla

  • huh?

  • I was saying are you the same user as UncookedVanilla ?

  • no...

  • guess what! I am so sorry it just now occurred to me that the reply you made was to uncooked vanilla to begin with. SO SORRY! No wonder you asked me if I was uncooked vanilla! II thought it was a comment to me because in part of this set I have comments blocked on the shooter vid to keep out terrorists who have been making ugly comments praising the shooter.

  • A person with no power at all and they attack someone with power, will not be looked at as the same as a white person who kills someone because they are black !

  • I am a part american native indian and it was indians who were in this land first. They battled with the whites and wra went on and the causcasions built the government here. So this nation became a caucasion nation. Africans were minorities and decided to stay here when they were freed. They have dealt with the disadvantage of being a minority and yes bigogtry did prevail until the african population grew larger and as they stood stronger to fight for equality have grown in power. 2 B cont...

  • No that question was for you ! I was wondering if you are the same user as Uncooked vanilla!

  • so you thought I was uncooked vanilla when you replied to uncooked vanilla? That is what I was saying I saw that when I first replied to you you had made a comment to uncooked vanilla. It was not to my vid. That is why there was a half inch indent underneath the comment to uncooked vanilla when I first replied to you I did not see that. Well it was a good mistake as I am glad to have conversed with you.:)

  • Oh I get what you are talking about. You mean when you first wrote to me !

    Yeah that was to Uncooked Vanilla.

    I see !

    Well yes I would love to keep in touch with you through YouTube !

  • I think Uncooked Vanilla is bias !

  • ...cont so now we have a moniority president. It takes time for change. THE BESt change is for ALL races to acknowledge that bigotry is an evil that is in all races. Africans who think they are not racist too are incorrect. In dark skin nations if you have caucasions who come in and want to take over the nation and be just a s large populated and be equal in power would also meet with resistance. It is the curse of the tower of Babel. There is alot of hatred to whites w/claims of justifying it

  • The attitude that it is ok to be hateful to whites in heart and attitudes because of the past is teh very problem that the change they so want will not come well not without continuing battle. It goes both ways. I was assualted on several occasions by african americans as a kid and adult. Yet I donot hate them so I chose to forgive them. Thatis what africans must do to relase the angels who work for such good on earth.

  • Um, could you add me as friend to your channel!

    I love your videos and you have interesting view points as well as good things to say !

  • It is GREAT to try to make laws to promote equality. Yet if a law makes new victims of inequality to try to MAKE UP for the past it is only repeating the past and actually causing more problems. ALL races should be responsible for hate crimes. EVERY race has hatred of other races. It is a delusion to think that is not so. This vid is perfect example of THAT FACT.

  • Good point, this video is touchy subject. But then what about with gender. Do you feel that only men should be held accountable for abuse and domestic violence when a woman could have attacked that man first and was more violent.

    Yes these are double standards. It is the same concept in a way !

  • In general, the law does not recognize speech alone, no matter how offensive, to itself constitute assault. The apprehension of violence must be immediate; meaning that it must lead a reasonable person to believe that serious bodily harm is about to be inflicted almost simultaneously to the conduct giving rise to the apprehension.

    If someone calls on the phone and says they will kill you tomorrow, you can probably get a restraining order, but this will not itself constitute an assault.

  • well see thats just the thing, if you recall my video clip one where I read tejh text of defintion of crime of violence THIS statement IS meeting that defintion and thus if he was white wanting to kill blacks THIS would be hate crime. But the vice versa on color it would not be. That is my point. The inequality.

  • Oh and also yes I learned that in first year of law school whcih is why I atke large notice to this bill. As alot of other people do because it DOES change the law in some respects. If you read the defintion of crime of violence it takes it a little further.

  • this is not about an assault this guy is inciting others to join him in killing white people.

  • These guys are out of their minds!

    But tying to the legislation, it doesn't seem to me that the Hate Crime Bill addresses this conduct.  This would be considered hate speech, but hate speech itself is not criminal. There are whacked out caucasian groups that have similar views about blacks or Jews, and they are Constitutionally permitted to speak out on these positions.

    The conduct is only criminal if actual violence is carried out in furtherance of these positions.

  • lol yes they are out of their minds. But the thing about the defintion thatI read quoted in thebill as "crime of violence" MAKING threats that intimidate others of violence or encouraging others to violence that is racially motivated IS a crime of violence. See clip one where I read the defintion of crime of violence. The defintion is not in the bill you have to look it up separately. Seriously though if this guy had access to nukes he would use it. I pray for him.

  • "The defintion is not in the bill you have to look it up separately."

    Thanks for the heads up. I looked up 18 USC 16 and found the language you were referring to. Note that by tagging on "or threatened use of force" in this context appears to be referring to common law assault, even though they do not use the word "assault."

    One thing to note is that the new class of crimes addressed by the bill itself are self-contained in scope, and specifically require physical assault.

  • The more generally defined "Crime of Violence" from 18 USC 16 is referenced not to introduce a new class of crime to the bill, but to offer states assistance in managing existing common law crimes with class-hate elements. This portion of the bill is not identifying new federal crimes.

  • Well I would look at some criminal cases to see how the definiton has been used. Because seems you and I are interpreting the definition differently. Ultimately it is the judges who end up doing the interpretation. AND of course they will go to the intent of the legislation to determine how to interpret it...which is why alot of people are upset about the grey areas in the new bill, rightfully so.Have you read any cases how such definiton is used thus far in federal courts?

  • "or encouraging others to violence"

    I did not see this language in 18 USC 16, but will grant that a general aiding-and-abetting clause is implicit in all crimes, whether stated or not.

    Keep in mind, though, that this generally only applies when actual crimes are committed by a principle. Encouraging violence is not criminal unless it is knowingly and directly connected to the actual commission of an act of violence; e.g., spurring on a friend to attack someone right in front of you.

  • Here is the definition for CRIMES OF VIOLENCE per the quited law in the text 18 USC 16 (a) an offense that has an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another or

    (b) any OTHER offense that is a FELONY and that, by its nature, involves a subsatntial RISK that physical force against the person or properrty of another may be used in the course of committing the offense. SO in applying the defintion to the act of (see next comment)

  • of standing before a group of people incting them to kill white people and that being an attempt to incite others to kill white people ( a felony to incite a felony to conspire to kill) and did indeed succeed in the act of inciting others to agree about killing white people when others in the crowd appluded him and agreed shaking their heads in agreement, they initiated the first step towards actually making the plan to kill white people by agreeing they must now come up with plan 2 kill(cont)

  • The man and the others in agreement with him are guilty of commiting a felony offense of inciting others to kill white people and conspiring to make further plans to kill white people and doping so in specific reason of hatred of the race of white people as so discussed by them in the video. To go further is to also induce others world wide by knowing it would be on national internet public viewing.Now has become an actual international crime because there are white people in every country.

  • (cont) furthermore, youtube could be held accoutnable criminally for allowing it to be posted on their website having people brought it to their attention and their refusing to obey the law and ban it.

    Then the crimes of manslaughter due to neglect of authrotiy in psoition and duty to prosecute could be held accountable if brought to their attention and someone is killed due to the conspiracy right before their eyes. Lots of felonies. racially motivated...etc etc

  • see comment to your last comment I cited a case using the definition

  • awakening is what has got to come of age sister i do entirely agree with your point and am really curious as to what the Obama Hate police is going to be doing about This ? " i bet they do nothing " lol ;-)

  • great points but newsflash that dear preacher "they are not only planning to kill blacks but also most of all races by getting rid of 80+% of the world population " and as long as he will promote dichotomy and racism he is missing the greater picture and playing into the hands of the "Divide and Conquer" people at the helm !!

  • Well it is quite bold of authorities to not care about this outrageous video and just let it be aired knowing it is spurring the very thing he claims to be trying to diminish. I am aware of the Georgia Guidestones 10 commandments to have a population of only half a billion on earth. Located in Georgia for any and all the world to see. What if other countries had a monument that said kill all whites or kill everyone except half billion people? How quick would we send troops? War war 3 on horizon?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more