The source of all understanding is an undying curiosity. NEVER EVER settle on the most recent or most popular theory or idea. Find out what makes sense to YOU and why. Study, step back and assess..study some more, and repeat this process of illumination until you find yourself prepared to refute scientific notions that place limitations on the potential of the human body ((for example)).
for all that to make sense, I need to believe there is a god or some system that will sort it all out at some point. Hence..my belief in creation.
****I apologize for those that have to read this ...from bottom to top..I didn't have the motivation to reverse paste all the data to make it all neat and organized.****
@IntrapersonalKent you 'need' to believe in a god? Sounds like a god of the gaps to me? If you'd lived in the past you may have said you needed to believe in god because how else could the sunrise? Or something else we now have a pretty good idea about.
so long as a pill can be sold to help manage serotonin deprived brains, in spite of long term effects, the natural, non-profit methods will remain in the shadows. This is the miserable, sick world we live in. A world ruled by men with great knowledge and power, who's greed and deceit earn them a titanic fortune at the cost of hundreds of millions of suffering human beings around the globe...
While studies performed both on the animal model and human have shown that pleasurable auditory stimulation combined with another pleasurable stimulation (tactile) can quadruple your dopamine and or serotonin production output..thats 400 percent for 1-2 hours. What does this mean? A known method to curing depression? Know knows...
I.e modern sciencists and researchers will want you to believe that are no means to increasing serotonin in the brain without chemical intervention. The motivation behind this fallacious statement is that the only solution to depression is a life long regime of SRIs. An expensive, money-making product that is earning billions of dollars a year to pharmaceuticals.
Finally, I have made it appoint to understand all that there is to understand about the interactions of neurons in the brain. From minute molecular changes to principles governing the entire cell networks and the brain organ. I've discovered significant discrepancies betwixt public scientific knowledge for example and what can be found in more specific scientific publications and journals.
I believe in all people having great intelligence and philosophicaly, to me, the application of acquired knowledge is intelligence..well wisdom, but wisdom or intelligence cannot really be exercised without the other. My good sir, I respect your opinion immensely and can only pray you do not limit your current scientific/factual understanding, of your own beliefs, to your present acquired knowledge.
Many people are stupid yes...I am a fantastic paragon of stupidity. I open my mouth with the supposition that my worthless little belief on creation rather than evolution, although outnumbered 300 million to one, will promote some sort of enlightened exchange on the source and nature of all theories in general.
"settling" on the supposed idea that your understanding of something so vast an inexplicable is sufficient in its own right. I believe in creation because it makes more sense to me, as an individual...that being said, there are no absolutes in science, and religion most often provides litte physical evidence.
I may well be encouraging a personal, thorough investigation of the principles and scientific elements underlying the theory of evolution. To advance one's understanding and knowledge is limited solely by the assumption of your personal superiority over your fellow man. As ambiguous and unpractical as that may sound, I wish to encourage study and learning rather than
@funincluded Simple..a neat, cute, simple theory that ties all that we fail to understand in a little red bow. Thats what that's supposed to mean. Most people who lean towards evolution fail to possess even a rudimentary understanding of the very physicalities attributed to that theory. Like I said: Cozy and cushy.
It's a blanket understanding based on the surrounding biological facts.
...to accuse a general population of lacking understanding of the underlying complexities of any issue is what Jay Leno does; it's easy to make peope look stupid, often because they are.
That has nothing to do with the theory itself, or the understanding the scientists specializing in that field
wow how could anyone believe in evolution. ppl quickly recognize a creator for a house, but something more complex as this they disagree to a creator..how ignorant... i guess ignoranc is your new betfriend lol.. but this is just amazing to watch
Over a billion years of the weak die and the stronger get stronger (natural selection) will eventually do that. I do agree the brain is one hell of a structure!
In a minimal part of brain have mothercell, or cells not mature, and they can do it. Not in all parts are this kind of neurons, and exist other chemical in the brain who cant stop the growth of this cells
i don't know for sure but im in modern biology class and we just talked about this. it had to do something with copying the connections and some other complex thing.
:P You are sixteen ;), i thought you were in colledge studying something in the field of biology.
I don't remember having any lecture regarding brain cells multiplication in my biology classes... :P They usually sucked, just like the science teacher.
:D DO you have good memory? My biology years were all about knowning stuff's name. I hated them xp.
god created the universe, meaning everything in it including mothernature which is the root of all life and evolution,is simply part of gods creation aswell, therefore making god truely an exsisting entity. religion is a totally different subject matter, the question here is does god exsist? the answer is in this rather mind blowing video of the complexity of a brain neuron which eventually you'll be convinced is created by a super natural power, we humans in this part of the world call,"God".
OK you sound like you have been reading a lot of the bible and studying it... Now if you read about science you will know both sides and can make an informed decision. We can recreate neural networks in software and it is a simple matter so why are you saying it is at all a complex matter?
First of all, you can't prove or dissprove the existence of a supreme being (there simply isn't sufficient evidence), so you can't say that god created the universe. We know where the universe came from, the Big Bang, but were not sure what made the Big Bang.
Now, let's say that somehow there was sufficient evidence to prove that God exists. God would have to be omni-present to have created the universe, hence he cannot exist in a material form, and must exist as pure energy.
This is the biggest mistake of all. People always look for a creator and cannot accept that "universe with billions of galaxies, stars and planets....." may come into existence without a concious "creator"!
How can you say it is the biggest mistake when logic says it;s not. it may jsut be that thought of urs is the biggest mistake. "nothing is random nothing is arbetrary" however i can't prove you right i can only say it's more logical from my point of view.
Why should there be a creator just because there are very complex things in the universe? I would have been more inclined to agree with you if complex life happened immediately after the big bang. But, as we know, it took billions of years of evolution to get here. So there is not big coincidence. May be there are many other universes out there without life which we cannot perceive with our senses (Well, if you can believe in a creator who you cannot perceive with your 5 senses.... :-))
continued- you are right however there isn't sufficent evidance but it seems illogical to me that this energy is inatment with no thought this energy must be able to undersand, and think at a level much higher than that of our own one can call it god scince can call it energy but it's living eternal energy. the 2nd law of thermo dinamics- energy is eternal, the law of conservation of energy - energy cannot be created nor destroyed. fits the view of god perfectly lol :)
Seriously dude, have you ever taken a physics or biology class in your life? Not to mention the fact that your spelling and sentence structure are atrocious, making it difficult to read.
Honestly dude, trying to correlate God and science does not work. Because science is based on a factual system, were things must be proven in order to be confirmed as true. And God is a mere belief, written by old people, in a very old book.
End of conversation, because this is a waste of both of our time.
Well i acctualy rarly bring this up to people but i thought that u were an intellectual person who was going to talk intellectually to try and prove my point inccorectly. i am sure i have studied both physics and biology not to mention all the other scinces far more than you. Well done attacking my typing ablilites i am not very good at typing so it ends up being hard to understnad i am sorry i don't have that ability not to mention english is my 4th language. u hav not proven ur point at all
i am talkign to u logically answer me logically scince and god fit perfectly in my view every thing is explainble through scince.
tell me why correlating god and scince dose not work? u can say it's a wast of time and u are free not to respond but in the end u still have not proven ur point i have explaind that god is and inttelectual energy through which our universe was created and it fits perfectly with scince why do u say it dosn't i would like to know ur side. thats all :)
Our body plains are already mapped out at sperm from genetic make up from the conception of the formation of the anus first or the mouth. Amazingly that is how we differentiate many organisms, we also have a central nervous system that is equipped with senses towards the anterior end of our bodys making the brain--process called cephilization.
When one sees that this is only possible via the very simple way of a human growing inside an uterus, the fetus grows those from a few connections over the time to millions of them until the human dies, knowing that it simply grows with time and only can reach such bandwith with creating connection after connection, step by step, like any network does, creating string after string working with an automated function from the beginning, that easiely can be destroyed with force from in and outside.
"Nothing random, nothing arbitrary"--How do we know this? I was under the impression there is a fair amount of variation between people's brains; that a lot of the connections happen from neurons spontaneously connecting. Of course it can't be _totally_ random, but I have a hard time believing the genetic code dictates precisely where to put and how to connect each and every neuron. There's simply not enough information in the genome to do that.
I don't think it's random, logically it can't be, as randomly refers in this case to a defect, when one sees e.g. alcohol intoxication and overdose, also there the working system simply randomizes the signals sent and creates the effect of being drunk. So the only fact can be that like with any network that works, it follows a combination of growth from still being inside the uterus to create the huge network with string by string creation while simultaniously achieving related functions of it.
Like when installing a network with first two computers, connecting more and more up to a ziillion, the internet as an example for a steadiely ill human with mental defects. When creating a perfect computer network with time and care for each unit and at time of every turn on of the next unit, the started unit is already programmed with it's function, a step by step integration of unit and unit, one can reach a perfectly working computer network that works as perfect as the human brain can work.
'"Nothing random, nothing arbitrary"--How do we know this?'
We don't, at least not in the sense that everything is pre-determined. People have done experiements with sensory deprevation of animals after birth and you can cause severe and permanent biases(for example towards favoring one eye) that way.
Anyway, there are several incompatible types of synapses, so miswiring is in many cases almost impossible. In addition, unused connections/cells tend to die during early development.
Nothing is really random in the human body anyway. You should look up the statistical definition; it's also the scientific definition.
Anyway, neural networks are established according to a predisposed framework. Experiences and other things change direction. I remember something like this when I had a lab tour in a neuroscience building.
I saw it ,The big pic of the universe looks like a giant neuron network,IS that what you saw? If this is true then earth is a speck in someone`s brain,That would be a big dude or maybe the big dude
Looking for an example of fireing neurons for a health talk i giving. I really like yours. If it is at all possible could you send it to me. Thanks for your time
pretty good video! ;)
edwinacorrao 2 months ago
the sun doesn't rise... the earth revoles around the sun.... it's a well known fact!
hidethefetus 1 year ago
@hidethefetus NOOO MARS IS THE SUN STFU AND THAT BLACK STUFF lol nvm
Avataryoutuification 11 months ago
@Avataryoutuification you lost me guy!
hidethefetus 11 months ago
@hidethefetus BLACK STUFF IS STEALING OUR STARS!!!
Avataryoutuification 11 months ago
i love my neuron!!!thanks to god for making it
shycentra 1 year ago
If you are luke-warm and simply dont care enough to seek knowledge for yourself...get into teaching. LoL. and the cycle continues..
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
@IntrapersonalKent You right in some points but damn that was great flaming my boy.
VooDooMadMan 1 year ago
The source of all understanding is an undying curiosity. NEVER EVER settle on the most recent or most popular theory or idea. Find out what makes sense to YOU and why. Study, step back and assess..study some more, and repeat this process of illumination until you find yourself prepared to refute scientific notions that place limitations on the potential of the human body ((for example)).
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
for all that to make sense, I need to believe there is a god or some system that will sort it all out at some point. Hence..my belief in creation.
****I apologize for those that have to read this ...from bottom to top..I didn't have the motivation to reverse paste all the data to make it all neat and organized.****
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
@IntrapersonalKent you 'need' to believe in a god? Sounds like a god of the gaps to me? If you'd lived in the past you may have said you needed to believe in god because how else could the sunrise? Or something else we now have a pretty good idea about.
Bumblybee256 1 year ago
so long as a pill can be sold to help manage serotonin deprived brains, in spite of long term effects, the natural, non-profit methods will remain in the shadows. This is the miserable, sick world we live in. A world ruled by men with great knowledge and power, who's greed and deceit earn them a titanic fortune at the cost of hundreds of millions of suffering human beings around the globe...
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
While studies performed both on the animal model and human have shown that pleasurable auditory stimulation combined with another pleasurable stimulation (tactile) can quadruple your dopamine and or serotonin production output..thats 400 percent for 1-2 hours. What does this mean? A known method to curing depression? Know knows...
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
I.e modern sciencists and researchers will want you to believe that are no means to increasing serotonin in the brain without chemical intervention. The motivation behind this fallacious statement is that the only solution to depression is a life long regime of SRIs. An expensive, money-making product that is earning billions of dollars a year to pharmaceuticals.
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
Finally, I have made it appoint to understand all that there is to understand about the interactions of neurons in the brain. From minute molecular changes to principles governing the entire cell networks and the brain organ. I've discovered significant discrepancies betwixt public scientific knowledge for example and what can be found in more specific scientific publications and journals.
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
I believe in all people having great intelligence and philosophicaly, to me, the application of acquired knowledge is intelligence..well wisdom, but wisdom or intelligence cannot really be exercised without the other. My good sir, I respect your opinion immensely and can only pray you do not limit your current scientific/factual understanding, of your own beliefs, to your present acquired knowledge.
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
Many people are stupid yes...I am a fantastic paragon of stupidity. I open my mouth with the supposition that my worthless little belief on creation rather than evolution, although outnumbered 300 million to one, will promote some sort of enlightened exchange on the source and nature of all theories in general.
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
"settling" on the supposed idea that your understanding of something so vast an inexplicable is sufficient in its own right. I believe in creation because it makes more sense to me, as an individual...that being said, there are no absolutes in science, and religion most often provides litte physical evidence.
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
I may well be encouraging a personal, thorough investigation of the principles and scientific elements underlying the theory of evolution. To advance one's understanding and knowledge is limited solely by the assumption of your personal superiority over your fellow man. As ambiguous and unpractical as that may sound, I wish to encourage study and learning rather than
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
People tend to explain the marvels of the body on the cozy and cushy theory of evolution. Its more comfortable I admit.
IntrapersonalKent 2 years ago
what the hell is that supposed to mean
funincluded 1 year ago
@funincluded Simple..a neat, cute, simple theory that ties all that we fail to understand in a little red bow. Thats what that's supposed to mean. Most people who lean towards evolution fail to possess even a rudimentary understanding of the very physicalities attributed to that theory. Like I said: Cozy and cushy.
IntrapersonalKent 1 year ago
@IntrapersonalKent
Well yes, everything in your body evolved.
It's a blanket understanding based on the surrounding biological facts.
...to accuse a general population of lacking understanding of the underlying complexities of any issue is what Jay Leno does; it's easy to make peope look stupid, often because they are.
That has nothing to do with the theory itself, or the understanding the scientists specializing in that field
funincluded 1 year ago
wow how could anyone believe in evolution. ppl quickly recognize a creator for a house, but something more complex as this they disagree to a creator..how ignorant... i guess ignoranc is your new betfriend lol.. but this is just amazing to watch
bulejay123 2 years ago
Over a billion years of the weak die and the stronger get stronger (natural selection) will eventually do that. I do agree the brain is one hell of a structure!
b1gr1g 2 years ago
We are only the biggest virus in this galaxy
92jacko 2 years ago 2
By the definition we actually are 0.o
fyr333 2 years ago
Those questions asked in the video can be answered using three words, "trial and error"
ferose2 2 years ago
human brain is a miracle :o
chiyokimalice 3 years ago 2
one things for sure, it will be men sussing it since women do very little esxcept blame everything for their own lack of creative thinking.
DLPBurke 3 years ago
In a minimal part of brain have mothercell, or cells not mature, and they can do it. Not in all parts are this kind of neurons, and exist other chemical in the brain who cant stop the growth of this cells
BalamPK 3 years ago
if neuros were capable of cell division, how would the connections from the original neuron be mantained?
ertreri 3 years ago
i don't know for sure but im in modern biology class and we just talked about this. it had to do something with copying the connections and some other complex thing.
rubiksking12345 3 years ago
"modern biology"
:P You are sixteen ;), i thought you were in colledge studying something in the field of biology.
I don't remember having any lecture regarding brain cells multiplication in my biology classes... :P They usually sucked, just like the science teacher.
:D DO you have good memory? My biology years were all about knowning stuff's name. I hated them xp.
ertreri 3 years ago
What is the name of the full video that this clip is taken from?
ariainvictus 3 years ago
love it. my 2 yr old is saying "my brain!" hahaha
ladyxeona 3 years ago
god created the universe, meaning everything in it including mothernature which is the root of all life and evolution,is simply part of gods creation aswell, therefore making god truely an exsisting entity. religion is a totally different subject matter, the question here is does god exsist? the answer is in this rather mind blowing video of the complexity of a brain neuron which eventually you'll be convinced is created by a super natural power, we humans in this part of the world call,"God".
hazzikmere 3 years ago
that is an interesting way to look at it i suppose.
but i dont think its supernatural at all.
If it was Given by "god" then id say that it is extremely natural.
although i dont think your clear on your definition of "god" and im not sure where Jesus would fit into all this.
Matt482942 3 years ago
OK you sound like you have been reading a lot of the bible and studying it... Now if you read about science you will know both sides and can make an informed decision. We can recreate neural networks in software and it is a simple matter so why are you saying it is at all a complex matter?
UnholySavagery 3 years ago
First of all, you can't prove or dissprove the existence of a supreme being (there simply isn't sufficient evidence), so you can't say that god created the universe. We know where the universe came from, the Big Bang, but were not sure what made the Big Bang.
Now, let's say that somehow there was sufficient evidence to prove that God exists. God would have to be omni-present to have created the universe, hence he cannot exist in a material form, and must exist as pure energy.
You arent logical
threadweaver69 3 years ago
Alright so god is pure energy since thats what started the big bang am i correct?
but is this energy, this massive energy, that was able to create the universe with billions of galxes, stars and planets innatmet?
creating the brain and the perfect solarsystem, gravity, and all these forces which work in perfect harmony?was this all just a councidence?
quit weird that not a single thing had gone wrong, the chance of life occouring was so small far less than one did this occoure by chance
bavly6 3 years ago
No one knows for sure, that's why everythings called a theory.
digitalgenre 2 years ago
This is the biggest mistake of all. People always look for a creator and cannot accept that "universe with billions of galaxies, stars and planets....." may come into existence without a concious "creator"!
nikhiljy 2 years ago
How can you say it is the biggest mistake when logic says it;s not. it may jsut be that thought of urs is the biggest mistake. "nothing is random nothing is arbetrary" however i can't prove you right i can only say it's more logical from my point of view.
bavly6 2 years ago
sorry, meant to click "thumbs up". The site wont let me change it..
gangsterdave2000 2 years ago
:) it's cool as long as the idea is out there
bavly6 2 years ago
Why should there be a creator just because there are very complex things in the universe? I would have been more inclined to agree with you if complex life happened immediately after the big bang. But, as we know, it took billions of years of evolution to get here. So there is not big coincidence. May be there are many other universes out there without life which we cannot perceive with our senses (Well, if you can believe in a creator who you cannot perceive with your 5 senses.... :-))
nikhiljy 2 years ago
continued- you are right however there isn't sufficent evidance but it seems illogical to me that this energy is inatment with no thought this energy must be able to undersand, and think at a level much higher than that of our own one can call it god scince can call it energy but it's living eternal energy. the 2nd law of thermo dinamics- energy is eternal, the law of conservation of energy - energy cannot be created nor destroyed. fits the view of god perfectly lol :)
bavly6 3 years ago
Seriously dude, have you ever taken a physics or biology class in your life? Not to mention the fact that your spelling and sentence structure are atrocious, making it difficult to read.
Honestly dude, trying to correlate God and science does not work. Because science is based on a factual system, were things must be proven in order to be confirmed as true. And God is a mere belief, written by old people, in a very old book.
End of conversation, because this is a waste of both of our time.
threadweaver69 3 years ago
Well i acctualy rarly bring this up to people but i thought that u were an intellectual person who was going to talk intellectually to try and prove my point inccorectly. i am sure i have studied both physics and biology not to mention all the other scinces far more than you. Well done attacking my typing ablilites i am not very good at typing so it ends up being hard to understnad i am sorry i don't have that ability not to mention english is my 4th language. u hav not proven ur point at all
bavly6 3 years ago
i am talkign to u logically answer me logically scince and god fit perfectly in my view every thing is explainble through scince.
tell me why correlating god and scince dose not work? u can say it's a wast of time and u are free not to respond but in the end u still have not proven ur point i have explaind that god is and inttelectual energy through which our universe was created and it fits perfectly with scince why do u say it dosn't i would like to know ur side. thats all :)
bavly6 3 years ago
He doesn't want to talk about it because he knows that the subject is not provable and is thus
Inconclusive!
Everyone knows how much time those sorts of arguments waste!
digitalgenre 2 years ago
Our body plains are already mapped out at sperm from genetic make up from the conception of the formation of the anus first or the mouth. Amazingly that is how we differentiate many organisms, we also have a central nervous system that is equipped with senses towards the anterior end of our bodys making the brain--process called cephilization.
AP Biology, lol
wilsmynukka 4 years ago
When one sees that this is only possible via the very simple way of a human growing inside an uterus, the fetus grows those from a few connections over the time to millions of them until the human dies, knowing that it simply grows with time and only can reach such bandwith with creating connection after connection, step by step, like any network does, creating string after string working with an automated function from the beginning, that easiely can be destroyed with force from in and outside.
NeuroConcept 4 years ago
"Nothing random, nothing arbitrary"--How do we know this? I was under the impression there is a fair amount of variation between people's brains; that a lot of the connections happen from neurons spontaneously connecting. Of course it can't be _totally_ random, but I have a hard time believing the genetic code dictates precisely where to put and how to connect each and every neuron. There's simply not enough information in the genome to do that.
TheMathGuy 4 years ago
iDk
Heinousness 4 years ago
I don't think it's random, logically it can't be, as randomly refers in this case to a defect, when one sees e.g. alcohol intoxication and overdose, also there the working system simply randomizes the signals sent and creates the effect of being drunk. So the only fact can be that like with any network that works, it follows a combination of growth from still being inside the uterus to create the huge network with string by string creation while simultaniously achieving related functions of it.
NeuroConcept 4 years ago
Like when installing a network with first two computers, connecting more and more up to a ziillion, the internet as an example for a steadiely ill human with mental defects. When creating a perfect computer network with time and care for each unit and at time of every turn on of the next unit, the started unit is already programmed with it's function, a step by step integration of unit and unit, one can reach a perfectly working computer network that works as perfect as the human brain can work.
NeuroConcept 4 years ago
'"Nothing random, nothing arbitrary"--How do we know this?'
We don't, at least not in the sense that everything is pre-determined. People have done experiements with sensory deprevation of animals after birth and you can cause severe and permanent biases(for example towards favoring one eye) that way.
Anyway, there are several incompatible types of synapses, so miswiring is in many cases almost impossible. In addition, unused connections/cells tend to die during early development.
FaithIsImaginary 3 years ago
Nothing is really random in the human body anyway. You should look up the statistical definition; it's also the scientific definition.
Anyway, neural networks are established according to a predisposed framework. Experiences and other things change direction. I remember something like this when I had a lab tour in a neuroscience building.
VampireSaviorX 3 years ago
wonderful
Malunah 4 years ago
I saw it ,The big pic of the universe looks like a giant neuron network,IS that what you saw? If this is true then earth is a speck in someone`s brain,That would be a big dude or maybe the big dude
zeno57 4 years ago
Not bad, but basic
MathParentss 4 years ago
Read "Neural Darwinism" by Edelman.
DougGirard 4 years ago
yeah, inquiring minds would like to know...
kellyevans 4 years ago
subelo completo!! porfaa
zaloalzalo 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON'T READ
post this on 10 vidoes or your mom will die in 4 hours
elladuckomatic 4 years ago
Looking for an example of fireing neurons for a health talk i giving. I really like yours. If it is at all possible could you send it to me. Thanks for your time
merl33 4 years ago
Thanks!!!
nopiedra 5 years ago
coolio~
Cefaclorskies 5 years ago
BBC vid on migration/dev for anyone looking for
otchacha 5 years ago