Added: 3 years ago
From: Sciencefilms
Views: 2,532
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Susan's ideas on memes are deeply unscientific, and poorly argued. *irony*. For example, she states that memes are 'only' that which is copied, nothing else. End of. Then states that memes are also the 'replicating mechanism'. As if they replicate themselves, like a gene. (Source - Memes and temes video). Does a toilet roll replicate itself? No. Please don't think that Susan represents 'science' - her theories are deeply flawed, and not presented scientifically.

  • Susan Blackmore is amazing and i loved what she said in that video.

  • I've watched Susan Blackmore over the years, on television documentaries, etc. and I get the impression of a scientist investigating the paranormal with a blindfold over her eyes. She has a tendency to ride a banana peel over important things and make a big deal about insignificant things.

  • @calabyau Then you don't know here story.

  • @BurpTheKitten What story? 

  • @calabyau H/she means that Susan was a believer in spiritualistic stuff at one time. However, this idea of someone who 'used to be a believer' is itself a questionable qualification (See Bryan R Wilson) It in no way means that she can't now be blindfolded. Shifting from one belief to another happens all the time - and memes are just a belief like any other. Her understanding of spiritual ideas is prejudiced and often off the mark, and wouldn't last long in many anthropology depts.

  • @Thimbledunk . You hit right on the nose! I couldn't have said it better, myself!

    

  • indeed, if only more people could think for themselves!

  • here here

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more