@ Shortcuttt: Are you on drugs?! Jason Derulo butchered an epic masterpiece! I wish him and his producer a slow and painful death before they splatter head-on into hell!
Really, bro, you can't be that high to say something like that.
Guys, don't criticize Jason DeRrulo, because he sampled from a song you happen to like. It's not like Imogen Heap didn't consent, and it's not like they stole the song. Criticize the song on its own merit, not because it sampled from a song, and to be honest, though I like imogen Heaps original more, I think the way it was in Jason DeRulo's was quite effective.
Bullshit - his track is nothing but the latest Auto-tuned turd to fall out the machine's ass. His lyrics are fucking TERRIBLE, and voice processed and pitch corrected to hell.
i personally like the first version better but imogen heap is an innovater and i love her for taking a step outside of the normal radio music to make such as beautiful song as hide and seek.
i played the normal one iver this one and its awsome somw parts are off but if some one has a audio editing program they could realy make somthing sweet out of these songs
Really beautiful, but my favourite part "Hmm, What you Say" is just... I don't know... Weird... But this is an amazing song!!!!!!!! I love it!!! (Still prefer the original though) =D
i like this a lot, but i kinda feel its missing a point. the part when it starts with "mm. what you say" is missing higher tones and notes. thus making it feel weak for what should be a culmination. otherwise very good.
mmm...i do like this version. not as good as the original, but still good. I don't, however, like the video. i think it kind of takes away from the song a little :P
IMO it was OK but the "mm watcha say" (my favorite part) got Kilimanjaroed. However if I had heard this first before the original there is no doubt in my mind that my opinion would be totally different. Its so hard to beat the original that hearing this after the original is close to a disappointment.
hhahahahhaha it got kiliminjaroed ? LOL funny ass comment . halo 3 freak. funny cuz im waiting for my game to load right now. you got that from halo 3 right o.O if not . embarrassing much . ?
yeah i was going for that effect lmao MLIA cuz i havent gotten to ODST yet. But yea as for the topic, this version is very good but the original is so much better.
On her Vlog, Imogen talks about this song and the vocals are completely new and re-recorded. This is not an amateur remix. The tone in the background is a mix between an instrument her mother gave her as a gift (its sort of like a mini-acordian). and the song is titled "Hide & Seek 2." That is the title she gave it.
the only difference is that the other one seems harmonized... both effin amazing nevertheless i didn't think i would keep coming back to a simple song like this, it seems like the more i listen to it the more i zone out into my imagination
No, I agree..I definitely like the original better. Sorry everyone..hate me if you must haha. If this version stood alone, it might be good, but look at what it's being compared to: the original that we all fell in love with, gonna be HARD TO TOP that.
Regardless, she's a very talented musician! Hopefully she keeps songs like this coming out...
This song is about when she had to move when she was a little girl.
"oily marks appear on walls, where pleasure moments hung before the take over" talking about the pictures that were hung on the wall before being taken down.
"crop circles in the carpet" -the indents from the furniture sitting on the carpet.
"hmm. what did you say? you only meant well?" referring to moving somewhere else.
I think that's the beauty of music. Even if the artist intends for one meaning it could mean something completely different to the listener. There's an artist who uses her chorus as his chorus for song that is about him cheating.
I've probably already posted on this video, but I'm going to do it again anyway.
What makes this version of this song different from the other is, primarily, the harmonies. In the other version (Hide and Seek 1), her harmonies are machine-made. In this one, she actually sang over her own voice and layered the tracks. The harmonies here are, as a result, tighter, yet more raw and emotional in nature. Far and above the best version of this song around.
I know, and I hate it! It's such a beautiful and intense song and then the "mmm watcha saa-aay" comes and I snap out of my trance and burst into laughter.
Ugh Jason derulo stole that song!!! Ugh I hate him!
eden20111 1 year ago
@ Shortcuttt: Are you on drugs?! Jason Derulo butchered an epic masterpiece! I wish him and his producer a slow and painful death before they splatter head-on into hell!
Really, bro, you can't be that high to say something like that.
xylki 1 year ago
He'll never have what Imogen Heap has: REAL MUSIC.
njisker 2 years ago
Guys, don't criticize Jason DeRrulo, because he sampled from a song you happen to like. It's not like Imogen Heap didn't consent, and it's not like they stole the song. Criticize the song on its own merit, not because it sampled from a song, and to be honest, though I like imogen Heaps original more, I think the way it was in Jason DeRulo's was quite effective.
bernardmarianovella 2 years ago
I never said this was the best version, merely that derulo's is the worst.
fl00ders 2 years ago
Its great because its different
Hannah1507Catherine 2 years ago
This version is terrible, and the video is just embarrassing.
youcheekyfucker 2 years ago
this was her, too... if im not mistaken, it's a live version.. you can find the video here in youtube.. the one with 300,000+ views...
shanlarren 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry but Jason Derulo Sings Better The Mmmm Whatcha Say Version! Thats Good As Blues! But He Is Rocking It With His Beat And Rnb Stuff!
Shortcuttt 2 years ago
Bullshit - his track is nothing but the latest Auto-tuned turd to fall out the machine's ass. His lyrics are fucking TERRIBLE, and voice processed and pitch corrected to hell.
Get some taste.
fl00ders 2 years ago
i love her sooo much.. she can sing... i love her backup in Whatcha say w/ justin!!!! omg i love that song!!!!!!!!!1
SeaworldTrainer63 2 years ago
should have left the mmm what you say part alone... that one just was not good..
UsedCarMan82 2 years ago
i personally like the first version better but imogen heap is an innovater and i love her for taking a step outside of the normal radio music to make such as beautiful song as hide and seek.
trmptfreak 2 years ago 2
It's amazing when you see someone thinking and feeling outside of the box today... amazing
futix 2 years ago 4
*__*
TheLadyB33 2 years ago 4
Haven't herd something so beautiful in a long time...
MrAtlantiz 2 years ago 3
Holy shit, this sucks compared to other one. Less high notes and she has a really deep voice.
handsanitizerftwx 2 years ago
i played the normal one iver this one and its awsome somw parts are off but if some one has a audio editing program they could realy make somthing sweet out of these songs
marsgriss 2 years ago
what threw you off? the long hair? breasts? higher toned voice? Enlighten me please because I'm lost...
xXXBurnsXXx 2 years ago 6
Wait, I thought it was a man! I'm not joking either or trying to be offensive!
Gloqwias 2 years ago 4
me too!
Heir2SeanWatkins 2 years ago
imogen heap = amazinggggggggg.
lilceexox 2 years ago
Speechless, just speechless.
spectrum99122 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She sounds weird on wat u say almost like a man. I like the original version better and how come u can't find it for this video
luvPrincesa13 2 years ago
She sounds weird on wat u say almost like a man I like the orignial version better and how come u can't find it for this video
luvPrincesa13 2 years ago
Really beautiful, but my favourite part "Hmm, What you Say" is just... I don't know... Weird... But this is an amazing song!!!!!!!! I love it!!! (Still prefer the original though) =D
SaoryEmanoelle 2 years ago 6
i like this a lot, but i kinda feel its missing a point. the part when it starts with "mm. what you say" is missing higher tones and notes. thus making it feel weak for what should be a culmination. otherwise very good.
lextastic 2 years ago 2
I think the original sounds better, still like it, but not as emotional this way.
Paula1Fanxxx3 2 years ago 2
absolutely love this version. and she isnt the only person that can possibly sing it.
SaturnGirlDark13 2 years ago
If you like this version of the song, check out Imogen Heap's vBlog #27, from about 3m50 onwards, where she talks about it.
DavidB5501 2 years ago 2
This version sucks. It was all good until she changed the harmony of the last part.
kgc00a 2 years ago
The original version used a harmonizer effect. She sang it exactly the same.
dex2988 2 years ago 2
Either that or a vocoder.
StirdKatzeStirb 2 years ago
Also, if you watch the live versions, she does sing it differently.
StirdKatzeStirb 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guys if you want to download this without paying just go to 4shared not itunes
chipshooraygirl5 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ha she kinda looks like a guy
morganNmadison 2 years ago
If true, that I feel like a bag of Skittles (R) now...
She has a quirky kind of beauty
Makes someone look closer, maybe as deep as her soul
That is where her music comes from, I think?
:)
shakkimu 2 years ago 4
I absolutely LOVE this right here very nice
fukkdahaters 2 years ago
<3 I love this......better than the original version
twinklemegr 2 years ago 5
ditto
SaturnGirlDark13 2 years ago
Incredible!
sute7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can anyone plz tell me what this song about or reply to me or anything plz
Mr3ly 2 years ago
Comment removed
RedFrostIndustries 2 years ago
The original is better.this sounds like something to meditate to.
yaoibanshee 2 years ago 3
i like this version a lot
the original i could live without
lovemyredguitar 2 years ago
mmm...i do like this version. not as good as the original, but still good. I don't, however, like the video. i think it kind of takes away from the song a little :P
lilmateo91690 2 years ago 3
Why does she remind me of Sigourney Weaver in Ghostbusters? Not looks wise...it's just something. I like the original better though.
ReDruM2105 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I could lay down a chick to this
inhumancode 2 years ago
I can definitely meditate to this
PenaltyKillah 2 years ago 3
the original is for me the better one of the two,
mzemhret 2 years ago 2
wow, this version gives the song a much more powerful effect. i think i may like it more than the original...
Emian89 2 years ago
IMO it was OK but the "mm watcha say" (my favorite part) got Kilimanjaroed. However if I had heard this first before the original there is no doubt in my mind that my opinion would be totally different. Its so hard to beat the original that hearing this after the original is close to a disappointment.
tallassb 2 years ago 3
hhahahahhaha it got kiliminjaroed ? LOL funny ass comment . halo 3 freak. funny cuz im waiting for my game to load right now. you got that from halo 3 right o.O if not . embarrassing much . ?
bummeh 2 years ago
yeah i was going for that effect lmao MLIA cuz i havent gotten to ODST yet. But yea as for the topic, this version is very good but the original is so much better.
tallassb 2 years ago
Can i have the MP3 of the song?
crs1012 2 years ago
limewire dawg. . .its tha shiznit
tallassb 2 years ago
the origanal is better, idk if its my phone, the vid., or its just true but she looks like a man i mean like shes post op. im jus sayin
stevenkhemraj 2 years ago
Only, the original like you say uses the SAME video? :S
Mazumune 2 years ago
this song was actually made for a album called kids of Tibet or sumthing... many other artists contributed to the album
belugawhale3 2 years ago
the original = better. like, MUCH better.
omfgmatty 2 years ago
here's the jist... it's just a re-recording and this time she doesn't sound like a robot.. etc , good stuff i say
Huckis123 2 years ago
I may prefer this version.
girlwithsunshine 2 years ago
Still prefer the original :)
MrRobF 2 years ago 9
Does anyone know the meaning behind the song? I keep thinking it is about domestic abuse.
TheSassyPants 2 years ago 2
my sister said it was about cheating but idk
zippyXDD 2 years ago
On her Vlog, Imogen talks about this song and the vocals are completely new and re-recorded. This is not an amateur remix. The tone in the background is a mix between an instrument her mother gave her as a gift (its sort of like a mini-acordian). and the song is titled "Hide & Seek 2." That is the title she gave it.
immyfan25 2 years ago 2
the only difference is that the other one seems harmonized... both effin amazing nevertheless i didn't think i would keep coming back to a simple song like this, it seems like the more i listen to it the more i zone out into my imagination
xrxhomeboyxrx 2 years ago 2
the beginning was beautiful, but then it got bad after 2:50 Mmm whatcha say. Your ruined that part big time. But beautiful beautiful beginning job.
nameseeker33 2 years ago
dude i love this!
modeldaughters 2 years ago 3
Not the Original but still very good..
cdg39 2 years ago 2
Thats why it says Hide and Seek 2 =_=
Super0Elite 2 years ago 2
That's true :-)
cdg39 2 years ago 2
PS: I love this version, especially the continuous piano note in the background. reminds me of the joker from the dark knightf or some reason lol
Mazumune 2 years ago
this isn't acoustic..
1lastsoldier 2 years ago
haha... i can see why you say that, but that is what this song is labeled on the cd, on itunes, and by Imogen Heap herself....
soccerstar6v6 2 years ago
no it's not...
polidic 2 years ago
Amazing to hear this decompiled version of this epic song!
Very interesting!
oscarson3 2 years ago
In my opinion this version is more monotonous than the original.
's bad.
Jouwl 2 years ago
the only difference between the two is she isnt using her voice-vocoder.
Mazumune 2 years ago
If you actually listen to the song you'd notice that the singing tune is very much different.
Jouwl 2 years ago
its the same tune, with a second overlapped version of imogen harmonising herself
Mazumune 2 years ago
It's not the same tune, and there aren't harmonics everywhere, mostly it's just echoes of the lead.
The fact that the tune is not the same most easily noticed during the "mmm what you say..." part.
Trust me.
Jouwl 2 years ago
i thought a guy sung it ! I like the original more!
IncredibleDarkSuit 2 years ago
lolwut
runnersdialzero33 2 years ago
i feel stupid, sicne when was imogen heap a person? i htought it was a band and by the original version i thought a guy sung it
Jbuisness21 2 years ago
Only I prefer the original version?
lylluzzos 2 years ago
well... just incase none of u noticed... there isnt accoustic... it has no guitar... or any shit... haha
barbacoa911 2 years ago
awesome
tecnique000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this song is amazing. but the continous note in the background ruins it
neiche146 2 years ago
incantevole
areasconosciuta 2 years ago
id like to see utada hikaru sing this :3
bloodydragon 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its so bad...:(
Largeman08 2 years ago
No, I agree..I definitely like the original better. Sorry everyone..hate me if you must haha. If this version stood alone, it might be good, but look at what it's being compared to: the original that we all fell in love with, gonna be HARD TO TOP that.
Regardless, she's a very talented musician! Hopefully she keeps songs like this coming out...
Later.
Jamesboybobj 2 years ago 8
This version, in my eyes, is so much better than the original.
alexandraabrown 2 years ago
This song is about when she had to move when she was a little girl.
"oily marks appear on walls, where pleasure moments hung before the take over" talking about the pictures that were hung on the wall before being taken down.
"crop circles in the carpet" -the indents from the furniture sitting on the carpet.
"hmm. what did you say? you only meant well?" referring to moving somewhere else.
ReevexRevenge 2 years ago
maybe the guys you hang out with sound like girls?kinda gay but whatever floats your boat . . .
Stereodeliparts 2 years ago
This song just gets better and is so very moving. Imogen's talent knows no limits it seems!
spectrum99122 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
What is this song about cause it sounds like war of the worlds
stormhaul22 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What is this song about cause it sounds like war of the worlds
stormhaul22 2 years ago
it's about the holucost (sp?) very sad, but very true song.
APawPrintProduction 2 years ago
I'm listening...
crxchin 2 years ago
I think that's the beauty of music. Even if the artist intends for one meaning it could mean something completely different to the listener. There's an artist who uses her chorus as his chorus for song that is about him cheating.
zakkori 2 years ago
FREE TIBET!!!
1qwertif 2 years ago 6
i like her music,she's brilliant and defnatly and individual in her music genre love u imogen
placebointemposhark 2 years ago 3
the final of this song is better
"You dont dont dont care a bit"
:D
Manu19cr 2 years ago
both versions r beautiful in their own sublime ways
clarren0912 2 years ago
I like both versions! XD
OOOO0999 2 years ago
The original is way better,
she kinda sounds like a guy |:
rockergirljaydey 2 years ago
how does she sound like a guy? ... really.
nymphexamine 2 years ago
i thought that too
ElphieandMaureen 2 years ago
Yeah the original version makes me feel like Im gonna die one day and people said I lived a good life at my funeral. And Im not making fun of you.
prettyintense45 2 years ago 2
shes kinda cute
mrgdud22 2 years ago
wow....nice but the original version is better.
ashleyray323 2 years ago 3
lol I know it doesn't mean anything..
But I am trying to do a cover of it..
It should be cool.. :]
But sure, put thumbs down on me because you dont care to hear me. xD
Shanman91 2 years ago
Both versions are great in their own way.
MeTube673 2 years ago 7
i dont care which version is better. this version is absolutely beautiful. i love it.
kaity714 2 years ago 3
yea the normal v is much better
GrimReaper5188 2 years ago
I like the original cuz it sounds a little darker
CatchTh3Wind 2 years ago
coure its a girl u nmbskull, can u not see the video?
hornzbee 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
is this a guy..... or a girl =S
chicka112301 2 years ago
The normal one is much better :)
hellohiuhu 2 years ago 2
swag.
AllowDashboard 2 years ago
i believe i hear a bagpipe!!
Blackbeltgirl150 2 years ago
You'd be surprised what it actually is! You can see it on her video blog v=KCVg82yvAoE at time 2m56s :-)
looseSpark 2 years ago
mmm watcha say sounded better first time around
xroosterchampx 2 years ago
no way. in this version its way better.
visavisband 2 years ago 3
i have given her so much time but still i do not like her a bit.
mamafanfan 2 years ago
impressive restructuring.
gilbertgbert 2 years ago
,..superrrr...dzieki..
MsLidia9 2 years ago
this is breathtaking.
browbrow89 2 years ago 4
i liked the aussie idol guy's acoustic version better.......
ooiyabukshui1 2 years ago
I prefer this version. even if it does make me a little blue hehe nice to listen to.
Nyamahoe 2 years ago
i do like the other version better, but this version rocks my whole world! its so raw and different! ah Imogen you never fail us!
juliannarox 2 years ago 3
just great, thx.
maxmem 2 years ago
This version is so raw. I love it to death. The expression she has in her voice is outstanding.
mrroni 2 years ago 4
couldnt say it better myself
xABitTooGorgeousx 2 years ago
This song is amazing!!!!I totally love it!!!:D:D:D
cLoDaWoDa 2 years ago
I like both versions!! Gosh I cannot decide which one I like better.
brandonballard1990 2 years ago
it's amazing that she sings without any accsent but she have a brittish-ish accsent
greatwarman 2 years ago
I like this version wayyy better! LOVE HER VOICE!!!
hondaboii89 2 years ago 4
I love this song! I just don't know wich version is better
unrealdwarf 2 years ago 3
just download applian player. it lets you download any video posted on the internet lol. and you get the audio an the video
TheMostHolyOne 2 years ago
this song is amazing. i have listened to it many many times.
eccdance33 2 years ago
I just heard Love Is A Story's version of the first Hide and Seek. And it's atrocious.
Glatadur 2 years ago
I have to say i love this song so much I keep on playing it it make me feel good in side.
Funnymangule07 2 years ago 2
Me too :) Absolutely love it!
bibbbbbbi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you allready stole the song by uploading it
reptile1000 2 years ago
yeh.. what a moose. lets tell him to take it down so all these people cant get to hear this great song. yeh??
joetri10 2 years ago 2
read the discription then you'll know what i mean
reptile1000 2 years ago
love is a story's version is..better xD
lifegoesBOOMx21 2 years ago
you do realize that imogen heap wrote this?
FansyTheFamous 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
never said they didnt. just like love is a storys better. endofstory[:
lifegoesBOOMx21 2 years ago
no, but, I'm not going to waste my time arguing
FansyTheFamous 2 years ago
Yeah, the original is better.
Love is a story's version i wouldn't even call a "cover" is a poor, cheap imitation.
EJY1080 2 years ago 4
cant we all just agree to disagree?
xxxSeNsEsFail 2 years ago
thank you EJY, for agreeing. love is a story added in drums and other bullshit that completely ruin the song. :D
FansyTheFamous 2 years ago
I hear the song 800 times and i love it <3
I dont know why, but the voice and the lyrics of Hide and Seek so Amazing *_*
Nellysassist 2 years ago
This was nothing short of amazing. I didn't think it would be THIS good!
lslewis 2 years ago 3
Raw and uncompromising, even more emotional than the original. An excellent improvement on a fantastic song.
AMCD6891 2 years ago 2
hmm - think it may be time for a new optik version - didn't know it came without the vocoders
tobyshew 2 years ago
I'm just not entirely sure that this video works particularly well with this version of the song, great version though...great fucking song man
TheBassicBassist 2 years ago 2
Kocham to ! :P
kasia51lr 2 years ago
Comment removed
orfiq 2 years ago
Intense indeed.
ek14e26 2 years ago 3
Intense!!!
bad76kraft 2 years ago 2
Like Camping!!!!
Bournai 2 years ago
Very intense!! : )
123aviavo321 2 years ago 3
omg intense
maxfactor11 2 years ago 2
I've probably already posted on this video, but I'm going to do it again anyway.
What makes this version of this song different from the other is, primarily, the harmonies. In the other version (Hide and Seek 1), her harmonies are machine-made. In this one, she actually sang over her own voice and layered the tracks. The harmonies here are, as a result, tighter, yet more raw and emotional in nature. Far and above the best version of this song around.
timeoffire450 2 years ago
So beautiful. Her vocals against a simple Carnatic drone. Favorite! Along with the originial.
welltodo6 2 years ago
Comment removed
lovelycelticopera 2 years ago
orgasmic-ly good
Lingo009 2 years ago 4
I still laugh at "mmm watcha saa-aaay"
Convoicev2 2 years ago
lmao it soudns funny in this version
mcshanksta 2 years ago
"mmmmm thatcha only ment weeeeeeeeeeeeell"
It's not as funny here though.
Vide0Gam3r8675 2 years ago 4
I know, and I hate it! It's such a beautiful and intense song and then the "mmm watcha saa-aay" comes and I snap out of my trance and burst into laughter.
Deffie 2 years ago 2
*gun shot*
bloodydragon 2 years ago
you retarded man. lol!!!
armo619 2 years ago
SNL's amazing wiff the soongs they have XD
bloodydragon 2 years ago
Wow! Great version! I wonder if I don't like it better than the original... I'm going to buy it right now.
Don't think I'll buy the whole compilation but this song defo, she did a great job with mixing her song with Buddhist monastery music, brilliant!
Hopefully I'll get to see her live someday.
natpfan1 2 years ago 2