i think beauty is more of an artistic approach lets not get mathematical and precice when it comes to beauty. It depens largely on the observer. I find women who have no "beautiful" looks but have great personalities beautiful.
the science of beauty is purely based on physical, sociologal factors such as money, job, personality, have nothing to do with it. symmettry of your face and the standards of natural and sexual selection is the foundation of beauty.. all those other factors are just variables.. but the science of beauty stands. all teh factors you list has nothing to do with the science of beauty.
My take is that there is a difference between attractiveness and beauty. Attractiveness is dependent on the individual while beauty is dependent on the culture. Furthermore, one can be beautiful with regards to their culture but not attractive to some. This is the conditioning of your "history". I see this within myself, I live in Canada with many pretty white girls but I feel more attracted to a thin, fair Asian girl. There are golden masc./fem. traits which are universal in attractiveness.
I agree with your critique 101%! You left me speechless that I was not able to give my own critique... :-D... Your presentation is rational and beautiful!
The science of beauty is inaccurate or I'd say partial. It only described the physical aspect of beauty in relation to today's western standards which is actually 'killing' girls and women to conform. The cosmetic industries are making a 'killing' with their gargantuan profits while 'killing' the environment with their pollutants...
my idea of beautiful women are the likes of audrey hepburn, mother theresa, gabriela silang, marilyn french, melchora aquino, corazon aquino and all those women who worked and fought for human rights and the downtrodden...
Thanks for your reply. The video provides a *critique* of the so-called "science of beauty." The word *critique* is on the title. Half of the video is on *critique* too. I agree with you that beauty is not only skin-deep. I talked about *principles* and *common cause* at 2:41, the way you talked about fighting for "human rights and the downtrodden..." I believe we agree on these points.
Re-title this. You give no formula nor math.
HumanChemistry101 1 year ago
@HumanChemistry101
reyty2 1 year ago
holiday dating site # lushfmlk.info #
WynneXanthia 1 year ago
The design needs lot of working on ..........
gsh73la 1 year ago
i think beauty is more of an artistic approach lets not get mathematical and precice when it comes to beauty. It depens largely on the observer. I find women who have no "beautiful" looks but have great personalities beautiful.
dannyboy12357 1 year ago
@dannyboy12357 I agree with u. that's why i wrote "a critique." best wishes.
reyty2 1 year ago
the science of beauty is purely based on physical, sociologal factors such as money, job, personality, have nothing to do with it. symmettry of your face and the standards of natural and sexual selection is the foundation of beauty.. all those other factors are just variables.. but the science of beauty stands. all teh factors you list has nothing to do with the science of beauty.
ozdcderek 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My take is that there is a difference between attractiveness and beauty. Attractiveness is dependent on the individual while beauty is dependent on the culture. Furthermore, one can be beautiful with regards to their culture but not attractive to some. This is the conditioning of your "history". I see this within myself, I live in Canada with many pretty white girls but I feel more attracted to a thin, fair Asian girl. There are golden masc./fem. traits which are universal in attractiveness.
aname4 1 year ago
Comment removed
aname4 1 year ago
I agree with your critique 101%! You left me speechless that I was not able to give my own critique... :-D... Your presentation is rational and beautiful!
The science of beauty is inaccurate or I'd say partial. It only described the physical aspect of beauty in relation to today's western standards which is actually 'killing' girls and women to conform. The cosmetic industries are making a 'killing' with their gargantuan profits while 'killing' the environment with their pollutants...
bridgecdngy 2 years ago
Comment removed
bridgecdngy 2 years ago
my idea of beautiful women are the likes of audrey hepburn, mother theresa, gabriela silang, marilyn french, melchora aquino, corazon aquino and all those women who worked and fought for human rights and the downtrodden...
bridgecdngy 2 years ago
Thanks for your reply. The video provides a *critique* of the so-called "science of beauty." The word *critique* is on the title. Half of the video is on *critique* too. I agree with you that beauty is not only skin-deep. I talked about *principles* and *common cause* at 2:41, the way you talked about fighting for "human rights and the downtrodden..." I believe we agree on these points.
reyty2 2 years ago