clearlly there must be an ocult gay army living in youtube, cuz i just got jumped by the gay platon of the asshole-unit from the fagzord-division, i shall not written no more cuz there will be another gay ass faggot ready to waste another bit of his worthless life to try troll me. this being said i hope you fags all live gaylly ever after.
Our knowledge of physics is obviously incomplete or we wouldn't have any physicists, just teachers. But new ways of thinking which challenge the standard model are more likely to come from the large hadron collider than some leggo
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,take part in the revolution!
True Free energy devices exist,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the revolution!
@speku87 then change the title fucktard!! you stupid ppl put shit on youtube with false, fake, and failed tittle to atract viewers and you ppl get sad and depressed when it backs fires!! so then retarded ppl like use the excuse of (you didnt read the discription first)to cover your EPIC FAIL! " I HAV READED THE TITTLE FIRST" well i have news flash moron THE TITTLE DOS NOT MACTHES THE DESCRIPTION!! poor little stupid retard your so stupid you can't acknowledge your retard stupidity...
@bazengao righto time i stepped in here-firstly bazenGAYo-oops i spelled your name wrong but since you cant spell for shit im sure you wont mind...the title has the words clearly written-video response-that means it is response-which i must add is to a totally bogus device.it would be pointless if i called Lego cog magnet toy,since that is not what the video is about-if you listened to the audio you will also hear me say it doesnt work-second you are caps lock shouting at the wrong person =P
@m3sca1 clearlly you have showned your self has a retard but now its official you can't even read wright or spell right.And your sentece make no sense but how could they?! Your retarded! And the main point of perpetuum motion is when you start it it won stop...clearlly that didnt happened in your gay ass lord video (ppl call it fail) and no i did not shout cuz obviouslly you cant hear me( another proof of your retardness and stupidity), and yes i spoken to the wrong person...(
@bazengao if English is your first language your grammar and spelling skills are in sorry state. You should not point fingers at others when you are the first who is incapable of spelling: "clearlly", "read wright", "Your retarded", "obviouslly", "i spoken" Holy cowbells what a display of ignorance! What are you in kindergarten? Seriously Man! Your comments are simply ridiculous!
@freakqnc your retarded aren't you? english is not my mother tongue, learn to read then to think... retard butting in non of hes buisseness... do a favor to mankind and just throw you self off a brigde, you dont need retards anymore...
@bazengao I must insist you jump first one angry monkey less on the face of the planet ;P
@m3sca you really pissed this lobotomized microcephalic Neanderthal with your video... wow this lego stuff you made as a video reply is really some powerful stuff man! I think are onto something and you don't even know it... mind control man! LOL!
@bazengao "perpetuum motion"? BWAAAHAHAHAAA Who's the retard now, go look it up you moron it's "Perpetual motion" you really should do your homework before you start flinging poo monkey man.
OK, my english may be a bit bad, nothing more to say about it.
But its not like i dont understand what u say, rather then i understand way more about phsyics then u will ever do.
Btw: our scientists know way more then i can imagine, they dont know everything, but they can tell u more about a glass of water then u learned in your entire life. And that are only the facts. to those comeup like 20x as much from socalled "alternativ"scientists that claim the earth will explode or other nonsens.
dolphin's top swimming speeds are also not physically according to the human understanding of phyisics. obviously humans have a flawed understanding of phyics and its egocentric and narcissistic to think otherwise.
You do know that isnt true right? Its actually stange that dolphins dont swim faster than they do. The reason is that it hurts to go faster than 54 kilometres an hour.
@LamaPaj you completely misunderstood what i said. dolphins swim faster than what human's understanding of physics would allow for. it doesnt matter how it feels to them, my point was humans have a flawed understanding of physics.
@LamaPaj you completely misunderstood what i said. dolphins swim faster than what human's understanding of physics would allow for. it doesnt matter how it feels to them, my point was humans have a flawed understanding of physics.
@nickgonezapolis I think you have that confused with bumble bees, which should not be able to fly if you assume that they behave the same as fixed-wing aircraft. But they don't have fixed wings, so the laws of physics stand.
@Dth091 bumble bees' wings shouldnt be able to deliver enough lift for them to fly. their bodies are too big and their wings are too small. obviously humans dont fully understand physics. so using laws of physics to prove a point, is useless.
@nickgonezapolis or u just dont understand what physic is about: it descips the nature AS IT IS.
bumble bees wings are small and they couldnt fly according to physics? yes, that was "true" about 80 years ago. when they started looking on nature for designes of machines. They just didnt know how to calculate it and took same formulas used for Aircrafts with static wings. But to descripe u how they really fly with dynamic stall and such things would jsut break your little mind.
@ABaumstumpf could you imagine of even half of our world's geniuses were as unimaginitive as you and just accepted the limitations of the human understanding of physics? no one would ever try to accomplish anything that would change our understanding of any sciences. when we bow to the limitations humans have placed on physics and science we learn nothing. we will not advance our understandings of ANYTHING by accepting what others say and not experimenting and studying.
OK, if u think this way then u just dont get anything.
The laws of Physics are made by human, but they dont make so things work like they do, they just DESCRIPE what happens. And those things are tested housands of times.
U cant writte on a Computer, thats just what scientists say, it doesnt work. And u didnt make it, its just like all those stupid scientists say. They just bend their laws of physics to make it work like they want to.
@ABaumstumpf first of all, your writing makes no sense. learn english. second, my point was, and you so clearly missed it, that einstein, and socrates, and all the other geniuses in our world's history didnt accept the understanding of the world as it was, they searched for deeper explanations, and we, as humans, still dont fully understand physics fully, and we should be trying to figure out things that have been deemed impossible, or we make no progress. we should try to DESCRIBE things better
@ABaumstumpf we shouldn't accept the descriptions of physics as physics depics, as there is usually WAY more than we understand going on. it would be egotistic and narcissistic to think we've defined it fully. as i tried to explain to you before, our understanding of physics is in no way fully accurate, and if accepted as it is, it would be considered flawed. so again, thank god our scientists dont think like you.
@nickgonezapolis it is not a flawed understanding, just an incomplete understanding, physics observes systems and enables us to predict an outcome but we are only able to measure so many variables... a dolphin swimming has so many micro-systems enabling it's swimming speed that we are unable to measure it perfectly, but physics has yet to be disproved on the point of the conservation of energy and matter.
@nickgonezapolis For those who haven't heard of this: in 1936 James Gray proposed that Dolphins had only a tenth of the power necessary to reach their recorded top speed. However his power output was calculated under the assumption that dolphin muscle was similiar to human muscle, which it very much isn't: it's far more powerful than Gray calculated. Our knowledge isn't perfect but conservation of energy is part of literally almost all physical science which powers the modern world.
@fasterplastercaster -- over-unity was impossible till a couple of months ago too. Perhaps it's time people redefined "black box", "closed system" or whatever
The only things that science can actually reliably say are that there are still forces unknown and unexplainable to them. (And that many of the current "truths" are actually wrong as well.) In this day and age science tends to completely ignore anything that challenges the mainstream view (which is not new in itself) but to have people trash talk this is just sad. If nobody bucked the trend, we wouldn't have most of the wonderful devices and comforts that we have today.
@DaemonLucifel2001 what you say is largely true. However, when it comes magnets spinning on bits of Lego I think we are in a non controversial area and that there aren't any mysterious unexplained forces going on. Quantum level, yes. Galaxy level, yes. Dark energy and dark matter, yes. Lego, not so much.
perpetual motion is not possible physicaly, theoricaly. and you think that with lego you can find it? lol perpetual motion seems creating energy by nothing. because of the frictional force that we have to compensate. and with lego the frictional forces are just a joke.... so if you want to do things in an intelligent way (also if it's just stupid to try to do perpetual motion at home) so please do not be stupid.... with lego.... lol
If the magnets are timed equally on their approach as on their departure from the fixed magnets, any attraction/repulsion benefits will cancel out. My guess is that a mechanism that snaps the magnets into the desired orientations would maximize attraction on approach and repulsion on separation at precisely the right time, thus maximizing output.
Bringing magnets together/apart is like compressing/releasing a spring. The same energy you store squeezing the magnets together is released when you release them. So when you look at any design, it always adds up no new energy added. Let's consider E=mc2, i.e. 1J energy has 1/c2 g of mass, so to create energy out of the magnet system, you would also be creating mass. Creating mass is called... magic. The many videos attempting perpetual motion shows how many people misunderstand magnetism.
Don't stop working on it. I have a concept much more elaborate, but based on a similar principle, that I'm working on. Just need more money to get parts. :(
You've got the wrong number of magnets, you need 3 on the outer and 7 in the middle, this configuartion will create a situation where a magnet is always offset to the outer magnets
Close but the gears are interacting opposite the lego video, if you add one more to each leg it would have the same effect as the lego video, and you have to anchor the center cog. The lego video is played backwards though (red repels blue, and blue attracts blue) But I would like to see you elaborate on this geared version though
from what i gather the magnets would have to be stationary in the since that the pole must always be in the same direction to give it the repulsive force but i loe it im am working on a kog magnet idea now as well
I've been hunting around on ebay to find what I need, but would have to spend £100 to get all I need. :(
Oh, and for the record the other vid WAS a fake, (it was filmed then played backwards, if you notice it comes out of synch.) But physically setting the gears to the perfect ratio and it would never come out of synch.
Actually, there are a couple of other things. Firstly belt driven gear run in the same direction, gear to gear and they run in the opposite direction. Another thing to bear in mind is you are running a 1:1 gear ratio, if you increase the main gear but decrease the outer gear you can make the magnets attract on approach then weaken the field as it is parallel then as it goes past, repel, (I know you can't do that with standard lego gear, but it is possible.) HTH
I think it is the free floating center issue. I'm kind of intrigued by your and the 'Lego Perp Motion" idea and if the time's available I'd like to try to design my own out of acrylic so I'm not limited to Lego dimensions. Do you have any tips from your experiences that would improve my design?
The rubber bands may be the key. Notice how they allow the same poles to repel, turning the magnet slightly so that the attractive force is seen. When the rubber band is streched too far, the magnet snaps back to repel again. It is really interesting.
i have built another, more closely copying the original-although i havent got the right size rubber bands yet,the 1st lot were too tight-see my other video response to the original-you will have to watch a little animation 1st though. =]
I think you need stronger magnets or less friction. I think the gear idea is quite clever. I fear it's prone to wear though. Suspend a set of magnets above the center disk that flip the magnets as they pass counter to the outer ring.
This is an excellent mechanical configuration... it's like a radial engine but the gear drive on 4 sides makes it 4 times mechanically advantageous than the fixed crank configuration. You should make a prototype already. I believe it will revolutionize engine designs.
im sure you all agree the end pulleys on the original are bigger than center-if center was fixed the size difference would continually change the position of the end rotors in such a way that they would not line up correctly for the next rotation-only conclusion for this is the center is not fixed
Look, i know what was your problem... from what i see on the original video, you need a fixed center and a litle sproket betwen the out sproket and center sproket on each arm, so the out sprokets, turn in the same direction of the rotation.
not the same-the mechanics are tho-when i get the same magnets as original ,i'll try again.Not being negative about it-at least im trying-have u got some lego and magnets?Surely someones got the bits to copy it exactly
if you watch closely on the other one,the center isnt fixed,and yes i tried it fixed,and still no respone from the maker of the 1st one as to wether it is moving under its own motion.\
clearlly there must be an ocult gay army living in youtube, cuz i just got jumped by the gay platon of the asshole-unit from the fagzord-division, i shall not written no more cuz there will be another gay ass faggot ready to waste another bit of his worthless life to try troll me. this being said i hope you fags all live gaylly ever after.
bazengao 1 week ago
Our knowledge of physics is obviously incomplete or we wouldn't have any physicists, just teachers. But new ways of thinking which challenge the standard model are more likely to come from the large hadron collider than some leggo
chrisofnottingham 7 months ago
Oh, what a surprise, a perpetual motion machine doesn't work!
aNickzz 10 months ago
your centre gear has to stay in a fixed position so the inside magnets are always in the exact position as they pass the outside ones
1MarshallRyan1 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Energy sources without the need for fuel or energy input exist ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,take part in the revolution!
cloudburstlenepmhq 1 year ago
yeah, a perpetuum mobile in stopmotion ...
lordfwahfnah 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
True Free energy devices exist,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Big change is comming soon!
slanderousndgs 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
intermitrj 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the revolution!
transfusablepng 1 year ago
I think you need to spin it a little harder! haha
americanfamilynow 1 year ago
you are awere of the defenition of perpetual motion aren't you?? cuz this migth be anything but a perpetual motion machine or device. EPIC FAIL!!!
bazengao 1 year ago
@bazengao and u didnt read the description. instead u flame other people videocomments. n1. poor fail.
speku87 1 year ago
@speku87 then change the title fucktard!! you stupid ppl put shit on youtube with false, fake, and failed tittle to atract viewers and you ppl get sad and depressed when it backs fires!! so then retarded ppl like use the excuse of (you didnt read the discription first)to cover your EPIC FAIL! " I HAV READED THE TITTLE FIRST" well i have news flash moron THE TITTLE DOS NOT MACTHES THE DESCRIPTION!! poor little stupid retard your so stupid you can't acknowledge your retard stupidity...
bazengao 1 year ago
@bazengao righto time i stepped in here-firstly bazenGAYo-oops i spelled your name wrong but since you cant spell for shit im sure you wont mind...the title has the words clearly written-video response-that means it is response-which i must add is to a totally bogus device.it would be pointless if i called Lego cog magnet toy,since that is not what the video is about-if you listened to the audio you will also hear me say it doesnt work-second you are caps lock shouting at the wrong person =P
m3sca1 1 year ago
@m3sca1 clearlly you have showned your self has a retard but now its official you can't even read wright or spell right.And your sentece make no sense but how could they?! Your retarded! And the main point of perpetuum motion is when you start it it won stop...clearlly that didnt happened in your gay ass lord video (ppl call it fail) and no i did not shout cuz obviouslly you cant hear me( another proof of your retardness and stupidity), and yes i spoken to the wrong person...(
a retard).
bazengao 1 year ago
@bazengao LOL that really got your goat,didnt it!
m3sca1 1 year ago
@bazengao if English is your first language your grammar and spelling skills are in sorry state. You should not point fingers at others when you are the first who is incapable of spelling: "clearlly", "read wright", "Your retarded", "obviouslly", "i spoken" Holy cowbells what a display of ignorance! What are you in kindergarten? Seriously Man! Your comments are simply ridiculous!
freakqnc 1 year ago
@freakqnc your retarded aren't you? english is not my mother tongue, learn to read then to think... retard butting in non of hes buisseness... do a favor to mankind and just throw you self off a brigde, you dont need retards anymore...
bazengao 1 year ago
@bazengao I must insist you jump first one angry monkey less on the face of the planet ;P
@m3sca you really pissed this lobotomized microcephalic Neanderthal with your video... wow this lego stuff you made as a video reply is really some powerful stuff man! I think are onto something and you don't even know it... mind control man! LOL!
freakqnc 1 week ago
@bazengao "perpetuum motion"? BWAAAHAHAHAAA Who's the retard now, go look it up you moron it's "Perpetual motion" you really should do your homework before you start flinging poo monkey man.
Camelrooster 1 year ago
@bazengao haha i LOVE people who freak out on youtube comments! you have to be pretty tough to anonomously swear at someone eh? :P
bjdr9 1 year ago
OK, my english may be a bit bad, nothing more to say about it.
But its not like i dont understand what u say, rather then i understand way more about phsyics then u will ever do.
Btw: our scientists know way more then i can imagine, they dont know everything, but they can tell u more about a glass of water then u learned in your entire life. And that are only the facts. to those comeup like 20x as much from socalled "alternativ"scientists that claim the earth will explode or other nonsens.
ABaumstumpf 1 year ago
cool
MrMe0990 2 years ago
dolphin's top swimming speeds are also not physically according to the human understanding of phyisics. obviously humans have a flawed understanding of phyics and its egocentric and narcissistic to think otherwise.
nickgonezapolis 2 years ago
thats an interesting comment-thanx for that
m3sca1 2 years ago
@nickgonezapolis
You do know that isnt true right? Its actually stange that dolphins dont swim faster than they do. The reason is that it hurts to go faster than 54 kilometres an hour.
LamaPaj 2 years ago
@LamaPaj you completely misunderstood what i said. dolphins swim faster than what human's understanding of physics would allow for. it doesnt matter how it feels to them, my point was humans have a flawed understanding of physics.
nickgonezapolis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LamaPaj you completely misunderstood what i said. dolphins swim faster than what human's understanding of physics would allow for. it doesnt matter how it feels to them, my point was humans have a flawed understanding of physics.
nickgonezapolis 1 year ago
you mean "not physically possible"
and that's the same thing with the bee, according to physics a bee cannot fly. interesting stuff, huh?
super6plx 1 year ago
@nickgonezapolis I think you have that confused with bumble bees, which should not be able to fly if you assume that they behave the same as fixed-wing aircraft. But they don't have fixed wings, so the laws of physics stand.
Dth091 1 year ago
@Dth091 bumble bees' wings shouldnt be able to deliver enough lift for them to fly. their bodies are too big and their wings are too small. obviously humans dont fully understand physics. so using laws of physics to prove a point, is useless.
nickgonezapolis 1 year ago
@nickgonezapolis or u just dont understand what physic is about: it descips the nature AS IT IS.
bumble bees wings are small and they couldnt fly according to physics? yes, that was "true" about 80 years ago. when they started looking on nature for designes of machines. They just didnt know how to calculate it and took same formulas used for Aircrafts with static wings. But to descripe u how they really fly with dynamic stall and such things would jsut break your little mind.
ABaumstumpf 1 year ago
@ABaumstumpf could you imagine of even half of our world's geniuses were as unimaginitive as you and just accepted the limitations of the human understanding of physics? no one would ever try to accomplish anything that would change our understanding of any sciences. when we bow to the limitations humans have placed on physics and science we learn nothing. we will not advance our understandings of ANYTHING by accepting what others say and not experimenting and studying.
nickgonezapolis 1 year ago
@nickgonezapolis
OK, if u think this way then u just dont get anything.
The laws of Physics are made by human, but they dont make so things work like they do, they just DESCRIPE what happens. And those things are tested housands of times.
U cant writte on a Computer, thats just what scientists say, it doesnt work. And u didnt make it, its just like all those stupid scientists say. They just bend their laws of physics to make it work like they want to.
Thats about what u are talking.
ABaumstumpf 1 year ago
@ABaumstumpf first of all, your writing makes no sense. learn english. second, my point was, and you so clearly missed it, that einstein, and socrates, and all the other geniuses in our world's history didnt accept the understanding of the world as it was, they searched for deeper explanations, and we, as humans, still dont fully understand physics fully, and we should be trying to figure out things that have been deemed impossible, or we make no progress. we should try to DESCRIBE things better
nickgonezapolis 1 year ago
@ABaumstumpf we shouldn't accept the descriptions of physics as physics depics, as there is usually WAY more than we understand going on. it would be egotistic and narcissistic to think we've defined it fully. as i tried to explain to you before, our understanding of physics is in no way fully accurate, and if accepted as it is, it would be considered flawed. so again, thank god our scientists dont think like you.
nickgonezapolis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickgonezapolis it is not a flawed understanding, just an incomplete understanding, physics observes systems and enables us to predict an outcome but we are only able to measure so many variables... a dolphin swimming has so many micro-systems enabling it's swimming speed that we are unable to measure it perfectly, but physics has yet to be disproved on the point of the conservation of energy and matter.
MarcRaftesath 1 year ago
@nickgonezapolis For those who haven't heard of this: in 1936 James Gray proposed that Dolphins had only a tenth of the power necessary to reach their recorded top speed. However his power output was calculated under the assumption that dolphin muscle was similiar to human muscle, which it very much isn't: it's far more powerful than Gray calculated. Our knowledge isn't perfect but conservation of energy is part of literally almost all physical science which powers the modern world.
fasterplastercaster 9 months ago
@fasterplastercaster -- over-unity was impossible till a couple of months ago too. Perhaps it's time people redefined "black box", "closed system" or whatever
jum401 8 months ago
PERPETUAL MOTION IS A CONCEPT, NOT A LAW. Just wanted to make that clear.
Mwstmrlnd 2 years ago
what vid was this a response to?
MegaTweek420 2 years ago
just click the link directly under it.
m3sca1 2 years ago
i know,i realized that about min after my post,little bit of sauce last nite ;)
MegaTweek420 2 years ago
lol no worries-btw check the perpetuum mobile -it actually works-i sent you a video-not the one i was trying to find but it show the device
m3sca1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Laws of perpetual mouvement machines :
1- they don't need inicial impulse to start running.
2- once running they don't stop unless brake is aplied.
3- they work without electric wires/motors attached.
4- and finaly... they don't work, whatever you do.
If any of these rules is violated, is a fake machine.
jotacril 2 years ago
The only things that science can actually reliably say are that there are still forces unknown and unexplainable to them. (And that many of the current "truths" are actually wrong as well.) In this day and age science tends to completely ignore anything that challenges the mainstream view (which is not new in itself) but to have people trash talk this is just sad. If nobody bucked the trend, we wouldn't have most of the wonderful devices and comforts that we have today.
DaemonLucifel2001 2 years ago
@DaemonLucifel2001 what you say is largely true. However, when it comes magnets spinning on bits of Lego I think we are in a non controversial area and that there aren't any mysterious unexplained forces going on. Quantum level, yes. Galaxy level, yes. Dark energy and dark matter, yes. Lego, not so much.
chrisofnottingham 2 years ago 2
Actually, we've got out middle-world newtonian universe pretty much figured out.
The real questions lie either in tiny or massive, or at high relative speeds or high-energy states.
amandarandom89 2 years ago
perpetual motion is not possible physicaly, theoricaly. and you think that with lego you can find it? lol perpetual motion seems creating energy by nothing. because of the frictional force that we have to compensate. and with lego the frictional forces are just a joke.... so if you want to do things in an intelligent way (also if it's just stupid to try to do perpetual motion at home) so please do not be stupid.... with lego.... lol
docsharp00 2 years ago
try locking the center sprocket to the base and have it move around it, this will stop the magnets from twisting too far.
watch the lego perpetuum vid and watch the center.
dioquaid 2 years ago
If the magnets are timed equally on their approach as on their departure from the fixed magnets, any attraction/repulsion benefits will cancel out. My guess is that a mechanism that snaps the magnets into the desired orientations would maximize attraction on approach and repulsion on separation at precisely the right time, thus maximizing output.
adanieltorres 2 years ago
You didn't buid a good motor, you didn't rispect the polarity of the stop magnets! You made a mistake!
Sorry for my english
Exeregon 2 years ago
Too much friction!!! the movement stop immediately for this!!!
eros84v 2 years ago
Bringing magnets together/apart is like compressing/releasing a spring. The same energy you store squeezing the magnets together is released when you release them. So when you look at any design, it always adds up no new energy added. Let's consider E=mc2, i.e. 1J energy has 1/c2 g of mass, so to create energy out of the magnet system, you would also be creating mass. Creating mass is called... magic. The many videos attempting perpetual motion shows how many people misunderstand magnetism.
Apoptosis74 2 years ago
Your center cog needs to be stationary
Paulisue007 2 years ago
i did try that btw
m3sca1 2 years ago
Or attached to a motor. That would help.
Starcross42 2 years ago
Don't stop working on it. I have a concept much more elaborate, but based on a similar principle, that I'm working on. Just need more money to get parts. :(
Garocheux 2 years ago
nope. You need money to take a science class.
tomboi1978 2 years ago
don't bother, its not possible
zantrua 2 years ago
do peoiple still believe in perpetual motion machines? ive never seen a machine that was more than "very close"
spikedgav 2 years ago
dont use lego.....too much friction in those placcy parts.
29379 3 years ago
apples and oranges...this one being the lemon
danbusinessman 3 years ago
how so? it is, afterall, perpetual motion we're discussing.
KEvron
KEvronius 2 years ago
You've got the wrong number of magnets, you need 3 on the outer and 7 in the middle, this configuartion will create a situation where a magnet is always offset to the outer magnets
radio909 3 years ago
thanx for commenting-pls dont let me stop you trying your configuration
m3sca1 3 years ago
lol! you're wicked!
KEvron
KEvronius 2 years ago
try again...
gotta fix the middle gear
...But you are turning the magnets against the magnetic field.
So the force you need to do that would probably be as high as what you get out of it - friction.
grimgroper 3 years ago
got any advice for turning lead into gold? i've tried everyting. almost had it, once....
KEvron
KEvronius 2 years ago
i think the gears are way far apart from each other and u have all the magnets at an even distance from each other but great design none the less
dragondriver75 3 years ago
First, the gears turns the magnets on a different way tha the rubber bands does. Second, the center gear needs to be fix.
bikermaniac 3 years ago
if you read the coments,you will see i tried it fixed center also.
oh yeah and the original is looking very much like a fake
m3sca1 3 years ago
cheers mate :)
lasarith2 3 years ago
what leggo kit did you get the gears from -thanks
lasarith2 3 years ago
was an old LEGO techincs bulldozer
m3sca1 3 years ago
The first one was Computer Graphics, you can see that it was brighter than the surrounding area.
Zalo10 3 years ago
YOU DID IT IN 0:44
XD
TUFEKAS 3 years ago
you built it the wrong way
w1z13 3 years ago
feel free to build one,if you have the lego,im so surprised there isnt more lego with magnets attatched.
m3sca1 3 years ago
Close but the gears are interacting opposite the lego video, if you add one more to each leg it would have the same effect as the lego video, and you have to anchor the center cog. The lego video is played backwards though (red repels blue, and blue attracts blue) But I would like to see you elaborate on this geared version though
adfsvbadfbvdffd 3 years ago
Most honest description of a prepetual-motion device that I have ever read!
eleog813 3 years ago
looks cool! sad it doesnt work
evopsomopso 3 years ago
it looks pretty cool but my Perpetuum Mobile works better
maskking666 3 years ago
from what i gather the magnets would have to be stationary in the since that the pole must always be in the same direction to give it the repulsive force but i loe it im am working on a kog magnet idea now as well
yeskazglass 3 years ago
have you seen the one grasswine made?
m3sca1 3 years ago
no i havent
yeskazglass 3 years ago
you havent fixed the center gear in place
mrwilapillar 3 years ago
retake it in teh daytime =D
kalep00 3 years ago
why?
the sun wont make it spin any better...
TIC
granted the lighting isnt the best-but there's nothing that cant be seen.
m3sca1 3 years ago
build a better one?
UNGlancer 3 years ago
see the video graaswine has made-his worked
m3sca1 3 years ago
Nice design. Shame it didn't work. Check out my lego perpetuum mobile video too.
grasswine 3 years ago
I've been hunting around on ebay to find what I need, but would have to spend £100 to get all I need. :(
Oh, and for the record the other vid WAS a fake, (it was filmed then played backwards, if you notice it comes out of synch.) But physically setting the gears to the perfect ratio and it would never come out of synch.
pageygeeza 3 years ago
Oops, also the rotating mass has to be great as to act as a flywheel, (how easy is it to stop a steamtrain without brakes?) Lolz. ;)
pageygeeza 3 years ago
yeah i hear ya on the larger mass senario,got any LEGO?
pls have a go if you do.
no 1 else has!!!
thanks for commenting
m3sca1 3 years ago
Actually, there are a couple of other things. Firstly belt driven gear run in the same direction, gear to gear and they run in the opposite direction. Another thing to bear in mind is you are running a 1:1 gear ratio, if you increase the main gear but decrease the outer gear you can make the magnets attract on approach then weaken the field as it is parallel then as it goes past, repel, (I know you can't do that with standard lego gear, but it is possible.) HTH
pageygeeza 3 years ago
Err, the center gear needs to be in a fixed position so the other gears move about in an orbital fashion.
pageygeeza 3 years ago
if you have read the comments -you will know i have tried the fixed center gear.
m3sca1 3 years ago
I think it is the free floating center issue. I'm kind of intrigued by your and the 'Lego Perp Motion" idea and if the time's available I'd like to try to design my own out of acrylic so I'm not limited to Lego dimensions. Do you have any tips from your experiences that would improve my design?
Thanks!
ccederlo 3 years ago
friction. Cogs have more. Resistance has to be less than aplied magnetic force.
soccrmouse 3 years ago
the idea with the rubber bands was they are like gears and make the magnets turn about 3 times before the next i think you understand :)!
jonathanpeck 3 years ago
The rubber bands may be the key. Notice how they allow the same poles to repel, turning the magnet slightly so that the attractive force is seen. When the rubber band is streched too far, the magnet snaps back to repel again. It is really interesting.
OriginalUncleNemo 4 years ago
i have built another, more closely copying the original-although i havent got the right size rubber bands yet,the 1st lot were too tight-see my other video response to the original-you will have to watch a little animation 1st though. =]
m3sca1 4 years ago
I think you need stronger magnets or less friction. I think the gear idea is quite clever. I fear it's prone to wear though. Suspend a set of magnets above the center disk that flip the magnets as they pass counter to the outer ring.
nekopheliac 4 years ago
This is an excellent mechanical configuration... it's like a radial engine but the gear drive on 4 sides makes it 4 times mechanically advantageous than the fixed crank configuration. You should make a prototype already. I believe it will revolutionize engine designs.
ehnriko 4 years ago
i am building another,this next build is much closer to the original...
m3sca1 4 years ago
im sure you all agree the end pulleys on the original are bigger than center-if center was fixed the size difference would continually change the position of the end rotors in such a way that they would not line up correctly for the next rotation-only conclusion for this is the center is not fixed
m3sca1 4 years ago
Look, i know what was your problem... from what i see on the original video, you need a fixed center and a litle sproket betwen the out sproket and center sproket on each arm, so the out sprokets, turn in the same direction of the rotation.
scorpile 4 years ago
i tried it with a fixed centre.
what surprises me most is that im not the only one with a bucket of lego and magnets.
Surely someone else out there can copy it 1:1
m3sca1 4 years ago
0.o i like it :)
Tythaz 4 years ago
jap, in the original video, there is the center gear fixed and i think the magnets are not in symetry..
GuiltyGearRockYou 4 years ago
In the "Original" there are no rubber bands. I think it uses normal little strings.
flagtube 4 years ago
i reckon its rubber
m3sca1 4 years ago
not the same-the mechanics are tho-when i get the same magnets as original ,i'll try again.Not being negative about it-at least im trying-have u got some lego and magnets?Surely someones got the bits to copy it exactly
m3sca1 4 years ago
No, this is not the same as the "original". So... be positive about the original as long as you don't have one 1:1 copied.
flagtube 4 years ago
if you watch closely on the other one,the center isnt fixed,and yes i tried it fixed,and still no respone from the maker of the 1st one as to wether it is moving under its own motion.\
m3sca1 4 years ago
have you tried keeping the center still. make it fixed like the other one
ozkey02 4 years ago
I need your lego tools.Please let me know where u got them. thanks.
goldocoasto 4 years ago
? from my lego box.i have had since i was a kid.Technics lego its called
m3sca1 4 years ago
ya just gotta try these things
=]
m3sca1 4 years ago
WTF??
Sixta16 4 years ago