I think we need to curb our breeding because it counts as exponential growth within finite resrouce. But I think it should apply to every parent/potential parent on the planet. Surely we can all agree on this?
Modern eugenics is not a racist weapon used to exterminate inferior races, but a universal genetic tool that improves the genomes of all races. For example, about 2% of blacks have a gene that enables them to consume large amounts of saturated fat without any rise in the blood's cholesterol. I have very high level of blood's cholesterol and I believe that everyone should have this beneficial gene.
Let's be aware that even if "carbon footprints" are blown out of proportion and is being used as a tool for "Carbon Eugenics" -- the fact of massive pollution and many animal extinctions is very much true.
Atmospheric Carbon dioxide enrichment is excellent for green life on the Planet, as a result all life on our Planet benefits. Meanwhile the Sun continues to enter a Grand Solar Minimum and the Planet cools. I hope we do not persecute the misguided warmists in the future, a few years in jail would be adequate.
I would like permission to re-post this and/or to encourage Stephan Corbett to do the same. We could make this go viral. Perhaps a: "Carbon Eugenics - update"
People are ready to understand the fraud and you now have the muscle to make this go viral.
I don't know why you are saying that global warming is a myth, I don't think you provided any evidence to disprove global warming. Except for referring to the Copenhagen leaks in which if you read and understood the full context you would know that nothing said in those emails shakes the theory of global warming. you seem honest when you talk but I hear lies and I wonder if you know you are lying or if you really believe what you are saying.
All of the insanities of the environmental movement become intelligible when one grasps the nature of the destructive motivation behind them. They are not uttered in the interest of man’s life and well-being, but for the purpose of leading him to self-destruction ~ George Reisman
There is a direct statistical correlation between getting more government funding and finding problems that only government can solve.
Unfortunately most people are scientifically illiterate. Genetics does play a role in behaviors, health, intelligence, etc. However who are we to use violence to force others to change their reproduction behavior? (Or any behavior.)
We hear the 1 child policy being promoted by the elites again as a final solution for the "saving" the planet.
Oh and some nice selective facts. Bernhard appears to have been in the SS, yes, but the facts don't exactly make him there as part of ideology. The fact he flew for the RAF against Germany in WW2 might actually point towards slightly less Nazi feelings... and on the UNESCO slander, it has many declarations such as the 1978 one on declaration on race and racial prejudice that states the fundamental equality of all human beings is the ideal toward which ethics and science should converge.
Well done. You've found one group of people linked to one thing, and extrapolated that they are the reason it exists. You make logic cry. Also... well, the emails leaked from UEA didn't exactly disprove anything, they just exposed the frustration of a bunch of people under attack from conspiracy nuts and vested interests. Eugenics is a legitimate concern, but this doesn't change the established facts concerning AGW.
The core issue is what some individuals will do to "fix" the carbon problem. Will they, whomever "they" are, resort to murder and oppression, all under the guise of saving Mother Earth? Stalin, Hitler, Mao...all dictators have used economic, scientific, and religious justifications for the betterment of their societies. So, is there an open movement to depopulate the planet by any means? I honestly don't know. But knowing history, I wouldn't put it past corrupt, evil men and women to try.
just watched this video. No wonder people are whipped into a frenzy and calling global warming a hoax. There are too many people on the planet and if everyone keeps having 4 or more kids especially in developing countries, I see nothing wrong with birth control for the women who want it. If there is an evil group who are still in favor of Eugenics, who are they? Don't tell me Bill Gates, Oprah, etc. would be for this. On the other hand, the Koch Brothers are probably funding it.
Global warming is a new religion that Al Gore and David Suzuki are trying to impose upon the world. Al: "Look! Here is a problem and only Me and Dave can help save you! Fork over your earnings to us (in the form of carbon taxes and subsidies for green businesses) and your salvation and that of the rest of the world will be ensured!" Don't beleive their lies. Resist.
@harbar3000 I'm sorry, but the evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to the fact that global warming is happening and is in part being caused by humankind. That's the consensus. Why don't you trust the consensus?
@TekkGnostic What research do you suggest I do? Trawl conspiracy websites?
Why don't you trust the scientific consensus (practically the entire scientific community, bar a few at the margins) and the environmental movement? Why would they be lieing?
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD The whole scientific field? Really? The ones that do "lie" sure do get a lot of funding, don't they? What happens to the ones that go against the CO2 scam? At least a large portion of the scientific field now agree the ice cores show that rising CO2 levels actually follow rising temperatures, not the inverse.
@austinallenfin Yes, the entire scientific world (bar a few on the margins, (like young earth creationists), and environmentalists, scientific institutions (which are in no doubt whatsoever), are all colluding to fool people into thinking that global warming is happening and that our species is contributing to it? Why would they do that? So, yes, bar a few, the entire scientific field.
On "the ones that lie", as you say - what are you claiming, and what is your evidence?
@austinallenfin There are scientists who say that the world is 6,000 years old. There are very few of them on the fringes, but they do exist. And people who agree with them will say things like what you just said: What happens to the ones that go against the evolution myth? Their evidence is discounted, and they themselves are laughed at.
Similarly, climate skeptics who have submitted data for peer-review have it blown away. Because their evidence doesn't hold up to tests. That's science.
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Partial list - notable scientists- global warming not man made: Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; David Bellamy, botanist; Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, Chris de Freitas, Associate Professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science; David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, University of Rochester: William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus Colorado State University; Philip Stott, Professor Emeritus University of London
@austinallenfin You didn't answer any of my reasonable questions - fair enough.
I'm well aware that there's (very very few) scientists on the margins who question the science behind global warming. There's no need to list names, in order to create a false impression that your claims have credibility. Are they climate scientists? Why would you credit a 'botanist' and an 'astronomer'?
You missed my entire point. The scientific consensus is that global warming is being driven by humankind.
@austinallenfin (continued)...is being driven by humankind. So why would you question the scientific consensus? You and I (I presume you're not a scientist) cannot interpret the science. How could every scientist on the planet (bar a few) be in on a vast conspiracy to fool people? Why would they do this? Are you telling me the science is not sound?
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD The majority of scientists in the early 20th century supported eugenics. Eugenics was considered a science taught at Universities all over the world including Harvard, Yale, and Standford. Eugenics received massive funding & support from the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Institution. It inspired Hitler & the Holocaust. Was that good "science?" You are being conned by those poised to profit off carbon capture. It is a scam & will not decrease fossil fuel consumption.
@austinallenfin The majority of scientists in the early 20th century did not support eugenics. It was supported by very few, and seen as a pseudo-science by most. If you have a source for your claim that "the majority of scientists" supported eugenics, present it.
Whether eugenics is ethical or not is a totally different issue to the fact of whether science supports certain elements of eugenics, as it no doubt does (it's basically breeding for desired traits).
@austinallenfin If you can tell me what eugenics has to do with the discussion of global warming - I'd love to hear it.
There are scientists who have supported horrible atrocities, developed nuclear weapons etc etc - what has that got to do with evidence for global warming? If some scientists are or have been unethical in the past (like any professional field; take you pick) that tells you virtually nothing about evidence for global warming.
@austinallenfin You rightly ask "Was that good science?" No it wasn't, and it was recognized as bad science at the time by the majority of scientists, and it recognized as such today.
This is all irrelevant, unless you can tell me what eugenics has to do with global warming.
If you claim I'm by "conned" by those poised to profit off carbon capture, I have a few comments. I could as easily say you're being conned by those posted to profit off delusion and conspiracy theories (Exxon etc).
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Exxon will make billions off carbon capture as will Shell, BP, Halliburton. These are the companies that have been funding your scientific "peer reviewed" research. It has been shown in ice core studies CO2 levels follow warming patterns and not the inverse. Just take a look at any of the previously mentioned big oil companies' websites and search carbon capture. You will see who is driving this. And don't forget about financial houses trading carbon credits (next bubble)
@austinallenfin Sorry, but Exxon as I understand it, have been funding the paranoid brigade. Look it up.
It doesn't make sense that these companies would be "funding" scientific peer-reviewed research - when most companies are opposed to global warming, and back skepticism. Also, the science is not something that can be "funded" in the corrupt fashion you mention - it's either true or it isn't and is subject to tests. Virtually every scientist in the world agrees on the science.
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Actually, when I do any search with the words (Exxon & carbon dioxide) I find that Exxon supports Carbon Tax legislation. What can I tell you? What oil companies are opposed to CO2 caused global warming? Big Oil is all for CO2 CCS. They are poised to make billions off it. The more legislation passed in the CO2 direction, the more profitable CO2 will be as a waste product. In regards to your view of science; It sound nice. I wish I could go back to seeing it that way.
@austinallenfin The mainstream "science" follows the funding. What exactly has been proven about the relationship of CO2 and global warming? All that has been shown is that there is a correlation between rising temperatures and rising CO2 levels, however this correlation has been twisted for a purpose (Al Gore left out which is the cause and which is the effect). It has been found in ice core studies that global warming actually precedes rising CO2 levels. Are you aware of this?
@austinallenfin I could also say that you're being conned by the paranoid industry in the US and elsewhere, who are dedicated to sending irrational people into a frenzy of hysteria on conspiracies like this that make no sense.
You claim global warming is a scam.
Are you telling me that every scientist on the planet (bar a few), and every scientific institution (all of them), and environmentalists etc, are conspiring to make a quick buck from carbon taxes etc? That's crazy and makes no sense.
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD I am saying that global warming is not being caused by man-made CO2 emissions. That is all I have been saying. The scientific frenzy over "man made" global warming is cause for concern and reminiscent of the eugenics frenzy of the early 20th century that spawned the Jewish Holocaust in Nazi Germany. Believe what you will.
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office."
@austinallenfin One reason why it's so crazy (beyond the glaringly obvious fact that millions of people couldn't possibly keep a secret like this) is that the science supports the scientific consensus. Any outsider with a knowledge of these issues can come in and interpret the evidence. The great thing about science is that something is either true or it isn't.
@austinallenfin On global warming, the science so overwhelmingly proves that humankind is driving our species to the grave that it takes effort not to perceive it. It takes very special people to perceive the opposite, so I must congratulate you.
You're one sick paranoiac my friend, the issue is about POLLUTION, the point is to find CLEANER ways to live, not to kill everyone, it doesn't even have anything to do with genes.
Why the hell would governments spend loads of money into healthcare systems, which by the way are FOR THE POOR, when they'd want to eliminate them by using a grand ''Global warming'' scheme?
How can you possibly link Global warming with the Holocaust? Are you Glenn Beck or something?
@CoqPwner go get some education, learn educate yourself and get a life, you make no sense at all! listen to the guy you might and I say again might learn something, if it is not too late for you!
At the end of WWII, the Nazis in the Nuremburg docket for war crimes fully expected to be exonnerated by their American financial sponsors -- people like Rockefeller, Ford, Allen & Foster Dulles, Prescott Bush, companies including Standard Oil, IBM, AT&T, GM, GE, Ford AG -- and because their model for eugenics was an American innovation. They realized too late they had been played by even BIGGER criminal extremists. That's the legacy Americans have enabled themselves to be betrayed by.
And now we have Obama creating "national monuments" over our countries oil fields and natural resources.
These people are "Malthusians". If you don't know what that is, you better find out FAST, because they view us a petulance, and themselves as the cure.
"Rent taking" isn't good enough for them anymore. It's too slow. They're now completely removing the people from the resources, and doing it through executive powers using their media created demagogue.
Again I appreciate the way you speak. Trusting people with their own intelligence rather than bullying or imposing upon them by yelling. Your pacing is nice too.
Remember Sir Bob Geldof? Feed the World and we all wanted to help solve all the people starving in the world.
From what I understand, they have something like 14 children. Health workers introduced and tried to educate about contraception. As I said the Pope came alomg and said Do not take it. So...it carries on...all these babies are being born to die of starvation. Now this man is saying what exactly? Prince Bernard was not a Nazi. so what this man says is rubbish.
@pammyoneto When people are educated, the number of children they have tends to drop. If an increase in certain populations is a short-term result of efforts to assist people out of starvation and into a good quality of life, then wouldn't that be acceptable? I think it is unreasonable to assume past failures negate the possibility of successes in the future. It is unreasonable to assume that sustainable societies cannot be built where fractured and distressed societies exist now.
In my view, this increase you mention in certain populations is indeed a short term effort to assist people out of starvation. As those people I`m told have so many children in the hope at least one can survive into adulthood and help look after those that gave birth to them. In reality it becomes short term as many die from starvation. I am 51 years of age and throughout my lifetime to date there have always been these tragic scenes of people starving to death somewhere in the world.
I don`t quite grasp what this man is saying. Rockerfella, I thought is a Jew.
Prins Bernard of the Netherlands I knew was German and married to Queen Julianna. Had no idea he was a Nazi as he lived with her in England during the Nazi occupation of Holland. As for trying to stop poor countries from as this man states `breeding`. I think contraception was introduced to kurb the birthing rates and starvation of babies. Then the pope came along and forbade it. con`t
Follow the money...who owns the FED, IMF, World Bank to whom the carbon tax will be paid however indirectly? It would seem all roads lead to...the same ilk that caused WW I WWII, Kkorean war, Vietnam, Iraq...etc.?
There is a common religion among all prime causes...BAAL worship..isis, no doubt. Which cults believe in BAAL....Catholics, Islam, Hindu, Masonics, and the many secret groups.
Look, freedom will win...the cults will be put down. Follow the money...ah, bank power....
While early 20th century eugenics was often psuedo-science (especially that used by Hitler's National Socialists), we've gotten much better at it now. We can measure individual intellience in a much more scientfic way with much greater accuracy through IQ tests and we understand genetic heredity a lot more now. As politically incorrect as it may be there are indeed IQ differences between the social classes and between ethnic groups. But yes, the anti-human population control leftists are nuts.
Kudos to James for really stepping up the level of presentations lately. The message to enviro-mentalists was a watershed. You deserve the increased attention to your work. Arrigato!
David Suzuki, Canada's top climate change guru, promotes birth control through education. He says that educating women around the world and offering some financial security will cause their reproduction to fall greatly.
From there, I extrapolate that David Suzuki is pro-abortion and would stand by when confronted with genocide.
After all, he knows there are too many humans on earth.
If we prove that humans are the cause of climate change, we'll be promoting genocide.
You're jump from one conclusion from the other makes no sense.
Reasons for large (4+ children) families in developing countries are often related to tradition, religious beliefs, infant mortality rates and the need for future family support.
So in an ideal world were less children died and you didn't need to rely on them so much in the future, he has a point.
Plus better education would mean birth control. Which is PRE-ABORTION, yeah?
Mr Corbett. Please present to us the mainstream's phony depiction/interpretation of the COP15 protestors. I believe this is a staged attempt to downplay the real political and economical descent towards the organizers/conspirators and instead portray the protestors as a bunch of frustrated individuals seeking more action than words regarding climate change legislation. As you have already presented to us so very well, these lying thieves have highjacked the cause, and now the opposition.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen in my life. Nobody is proposing eugenics for the third world. The one thing this ignoramus doesn't discuss are the facts: human output of CO2 is rapidly changing the earth's climate. You may not like potential policy implications -- but facts are stubborn things, and those are the facts.
You're a good example of why once upon a time not everyone was allowed to vote.
You hate humanity so much that you're willing to pretend that starvation does not exist, and that the state has never figured out that they can use food and deindustrialization as weapons in targeted depopulation.
These warmists make the Nazi war criminals look like amateurs. You as a "eugenics denier" fall into that camp, which may explain why you're hiding behind that pathetic handle as cover.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@buddcinder Every living thing on the planet needs water, but if your mama held your under water until the thrashing stopped you would be rightly concerned about the effects of too much water. When you increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, the temperature increases. This isn't even remotely controversial -- in fact we've known about the greenhouse effect since the 19th century.
@jewy Obviously you've been watching the world with your eyes closed. Temp on Earth rise before Co2 by nearly 800 yrs. You have been proven wrong on that issue and the hockey will go down in history as snake oil.
Hi Jewy, actually... they are. It's the proposal of the UN that stringent measures are made to curb population levels in developing nations in return for Carbon Offset trading values. So if a country implements a sterilisation program (voluntary of course) this is to be counted against their CO2 output.
As for CO2 levels. Currently they are estimated to be 0.028% of the atmosphere of our planet. At current levels of increase by 2100 it will be 0.030%.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ascolti Limiting population growth (education, family planning, etc.) isn't the same thing as imposing eugenics. Stupid red herring. But that's the least stupid thing in your post.
CO2 is only .028% of the atmosphere? Well you're absurdly wrong -- it's currently .038%. .035% is the safe upper limit for CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere -- which we're well beyond already. If we were at .028% I wouldn't be worried about climate change either.
" If we were at .028% I wouldn't be worried about climate change either." I didn't realise you were a climate scientist, or a scientist. Is this the case?
0.038%? Are you talking about Pieter Tans' Mauna Loa data set. Seriously?
If you'd bothered to read the article "Trends in Carbon Dioxide" rather than Wikipedia you'll have spotted the phrase "The Mauna Loa data are being obtained at an altitude of 3400 m in the northern subtropics, and may not be the same as the globally averaged CO2 concentration at the surface.." - and the fact that the last two years data are preliminary and "subject to change".
Look @jewy, I'm not going to allow myself to get as rude and inflammatory as you have. Raging against everybody in this comment list who doesn't share you're view point isn't going to win the argument or make people change their opinions on your own viewpoint or the sort of person you are.
I'm sure there are a number of things we have in common. I'm an adherent to stronger pollution policy. But my concern is SO2 and so forth. Plus, I'm ready the CRU leaked files with informed eyes. Are you?
Incidentally @jewy, somebody bumped you're comment down and I've bumped it back up. Because even though I think you're rude.
You are correct(ish). NASA have a balanced 350-375 ppm CO2 value. But as for a "safe limit", I'm not sure were that comes from. First up you'd have to subscribe to the theory before that would be valid. CO2 levels have been higher, during considerably LOWER temperatures.
What do you have to say for that? Or are you going to deny the science on that, as per CRU doctrine
that's it i'm subscribing.i would'nt reject the notion that the hoaxenhagen protesters were paid.any rational person can see that they want slavery.and alot of death.
@redcollargedeon so then lets instead tell people they should all have as many children as they want as the worldwide climate is changing for the unknown? lol yeah i'm sure nothing bad can happen.
Look, I'm not trying to be obnoxious here, I just reject carbon taxes.
You don't have to tell anyone to have as many kids as they want. Do you think the Muslim world is taking notice of the Climate Change debate? Is India taking drastic measures?
The only people who would listen to this are in the Western World. We're made to feel guilty about it and there's no proof that Carbon Taxes would make any difference.
But if you think CO2 will kill us all, maybe you can stop breathing right now. That might help, except that there are 8 billion humans who will continue to breath, so good luck with that CO2.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
linking eugenics of the forties to todat is laughable. No one in the forties even knew about global warming. to link hitler with global warming is a great injustice. That while it is unpopular is also crazy. You will not be the first to oppose climate change. You're no George Washington, only a corporate patsy/luddite
You either didn't listen to a thing he said or you're officially retarded.
Take a look at the corporate members list in the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR is fully backing this genocidal global warming pseudo science, JUST AS THE OIL COMPANIES ARE. Yet he's the "corporate patsy/ludite"?
After WW2 the eugenics movement chose "population control" and "environmentalism" as their new euphemisms to operate under. It isn't even debatable.
I don't think he does suggest Hitler used global warming.
He was merely showing how a similar outcome can be sought using a new rational. To which he makes a good point.
Having actually read ALL the 160mb of the leaked emails, documents, source code and data... I'm very much inclined to agree with the opinion that a lot of pseudo science has been going on and that remarks and indeed conclusions have been given out that are exaggerated at best, outright lies in other cases.
Excellent concise rendering of the history of the families, the foundations and events involved in the BIG PICTURE of eugenics and the environmental fraud scam to take-over the world. It is so easy to see the big picture and KNOW that this sinister plan is in progress after you know the history of the "SocialIST Biologists"...Well done James Corbett !! Thank you for making an excellent video that I can store in a Blackberry and whip it out anytime I come across someone needing AND wanting info
Very well stated sir! Keep up the great work. These short statements are perfect to help set the seeds needed to open folks eyes and ears to what is going on in this world.
Superb, Mr Corbett, I have read a lot on this topic and it is refreshing to see someone with your following discuss it openly and eloquently. The Huxley brothers, Aldous and Julian, writer and founder of UNESCO is little discussed. Brave New World was less fiction and more prediction. Keep going my friend, people are listening.
Not that its not already going on through water fluoridation, sodium benzoate, aspartame, depleted uranium, HIV in vaccinations, mercury in vaccinations, live cancer viruses in vaccinations, GMO's, plans like codex alimentarius and Monsanto taking over foods, prescription drugs the forth leading cause of death in the US right now. Etc.....
this post contains so much that you have to go through it again and again and look into the whole theme of eugenics, its history, the players behind it back then and today and connect all the dots. the fact that soros is calling for china to take a more leading role in the NWO, rockefeller praising china in 1973 for being a successful model fits so much in the big picture. these people are hardcore nazis and have to be stopped!!!
so true, James.......i wish those who would listen could hear these words, and those who are on the other side would repent of there deedsand failed ideology.....thank you for your bravery, and truth
How do we stop these politicians from making this criminal laws? My senators and congress member are e-mailing me plugging Global Warming with great enthusiasm. They never listen to me.
The MSM is down playing or ignoring Climategate.
Obama has been connected to the Chicago Climate Exchange for many years.
Absolutely on the money; this commentary is better than any MSM commentator.
First it was 'racial purty' the cause celebre for genocide; Now it's 'environmental purity' that gives rise to the same spirit that brought about WW II, and the NAZI party.
So environmentalism is the rebirth of the same eugenicist ideals that brought about mass culling of populations.
Excellent background of the Eugenics/Overpopulation movement. Knowledge is power. It also is the key to debunk inhumane and immoral causes like Eugenics or whatever name is used to disguise it.
The same twisted argument could be twisted further to turn the tables around. Since fossil fuel consumption is proportional to wealth, the rich having big SUVs, RVs, yachts, private planes, mansions, etc, then you could argue that the most effective way to reduce the carbon footprint would be to eliminate the rich. How ironic. I am against eugenics. It is just a power grab for more control.
yes nazi is a very misused term. politically they nazi party was left wing although not as left wing as communism. comminism /fascism= same thing, rule of the many by the divine right of kings from god.
the enviro zombies are eugenists. They intend to impose massive carbon taxes on the developing countries...which are dealing with extreme poverty and starvation because of these taxes ..gas and energy prices will skyrocket as will the price of food and all commodities. This is eugenics and genocide.
as a man of the Earth who works to raise consciousness around RESPECT & REVERENCE for the Rain Forest and the 1st sustainable environment, THE HUMAN BODY TEMPLE: i have "smelled a rat" with these well meaning, misguided, bamboozled, duped environmentalists vilifying ppl and oil companies for their carbon footprint as the drive or fly to their protests!
WTF! can i get a witness james?! you put words to my feelings!
We should use their own philosophy agianst them. If anyone needs to be eliminated from the gene pool it is the ones who have made themselves filthy, stinking rich through the use of fraud. Bankers and politicians are at the top of that list!
I mean really, which do you think does society more damage, ten honest but simple-minded people or one con-artist?
This carbon trading scheme does not serve the interests of social justice. Quite the opposite. What is now being contemplated is a multibillion trade in Carbon Derivatives: the banks are slated "to make a killing" on carbon trading, with massive fraud and insider trading in the carbon trading markets. The Multibillion Trade in Carbon Derivatives, Global Research,the architect of Credit Default Swaps at JP Morgan is behind the development of a trading system in "Carbon Derivatives". GoldmineSAX
regardless of who the person was or where he came from he is still by all means a hero for what he or they did, I see nothing wrong with your questions MrMooDang and I apologize for the shitty replies to it, Unless I am mistaken by your wanting to know.
Thanks, I've been a longtime fan of the Corbett Report. I am sympathetic with his views, but it makes me uncomfortable to see him charging this debate with emotional rhetoric. There's already enough hyperbole out there. Sober investigative reporting unafraid to tackle controversial issues is what middle class America sorely needs -- and which we certainly don't get from the mainstream media (or from the high profile Alex Jones). I think Corbett is the man for the job:-)
One of the BIG problems in our society is this notion that if you inject an appropriate emotional element to an argument is somehow inferior to a dispassionate presentation. Sometimes it's true, sometimes it's not at all true. If I'm having a heart attack, I want someone to SCREAM for help and communicate the urgency of the situation, not some calm dispassionate dialog that doesn't. We have man URGENT situations that must carry the emotional reality when we discuss them.
Agreed. Lack of passionate conviction is at the root of our predicament. But passion if misguided is no better than pedantic dithering. Passion informed by knowledge is vital for a healthy society...especially now with issues as perplexing and potentially perilous as climate change and world government. A sure footing is needed upon which to take a stand!
The perfect expose detailing why the Elite plan to make billions off a plan which has already and continues to starve millions of innocents in the third world to death.
I think we need to curb our breeding because it counts as exponential growth within finite resrouce. But I think it should apply to every parent/potential parent on the planet. Surely we can all agree on this?
cr0uchingtiger 2 weeks ago
you are a hero to me... thank you for spreading the truth...
pookiroo 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
pookiroo 2 weeks ago
excellent awesome video...
pookiroo 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Eugenics and population control are the only ways to end global starvation, ecocide, and poverty.
polka23dot 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Modern eugenics is not a racist weapon used to exterminate inferior races, but a universal genetic tool that improves the genomes of all races. For example, about 2% of blacks have a gene that enables them to consume large amounts of saturated fat without any rise in the blood's cholesterol. I have very high level of blood's cholesterol and I believe that everyone should have this beneficial gene.
polka23dot 1 month ago
You bring up some interesting points.
5:05 Do you say the World Wildlife Fund is bad?
7:15 Who leaked the documents?
Let's be aware that even if "carbon footprints" are blown out of proportion and is being used as a tool for "Carbon Eugenics" -- the fact of massive pollution and many animal extinctions is very much true.
Laoch111 2 months ago
OUR HERO.....As my Beloved Grandmother would say......You come from a Good Egg....
illuminationclub 2 months ago
Atmospheric Carbon dioxide enrichment is excellent for green life on the Planet, as a result all life on our Planet benefits. Meanwhile the Sun continues to enter a Grand Solar Minimum and the Planet cools. I hope we do not persecute the misguided warmists in the future, a few years in jail would be adequate.
david222444 5 months ago
your teeth are inferior ^^
CayleRose 5 months ago
I would like permission to re-post this and/or to encourage Stephan Corbett to do the same. We could make this go viral. Perhaps a: "Carbon Eugenics - update"
People are ready to understand the fraud and you now have the muscle to make this go viral.
FreedomsReigning 5 months ago
maybe a guerilla chef will get hold of some special German sprouts for lunch at Bilderberger
voxoo 7 months ago
I don't know why you are saying that global warming is a myth, I don't think you provided any evidence to disprove global warming. Except for referring to the Copenhagen leaks in which if you read and understood the full context you would know that nothing said in those emails shakes the theory of global warming. you seem honest when you talk but I hear lies and I wonder if you know you are lying or if you really believe what you are saying.
Thunderharald 1 year ago
All of the insanities of the environmental movement become intelligible when one grasps the nature of the destructive motivation behind them. They are not uttered in the interest of man’s life and well-being, but for the purpose of leading him to self-destruction ~ George Reisman
utubegirlx 1 year ago 2
There is a direct statistical correlation between getting more government funding and finding problems that only government can solve.
Unfortunately most people are scientifically illiterate. Genetics does play a role in behaviors, health, intelligence, etc. However who are we to use violence to force others to change their reproduction behavior? (Or any behavior.)
We hear the 1 child policy being promoted by the elites again as a final solution for the "saving" the planet.
XCritonX 1 year ago
Oh and some nice selective facts. Bernhard appears to have been in the SS, yes, but the facts don't exactly make him there as part of ideology. The fact he flew for the RAF against Germany in WW2 might actually point towards slightly less Nazi feelings... and on the UNESCO slander, it has many declarations such as the 1978 one on declaration on race and racial prejudice that states the fundamental equality of all human beings is the ideal toward which ethics and science should converge.
danleeuk 1 year ago
Well done. You've found one group of people linked to one thing, and extrapolated that they are the reason it exists. You make logic cry. Also... well, the emails leaked from UEA didn't exactly disprove anything, they just exposed the frustration of a bunch of people under attack from conspiracy nuts and vested interests. Eugenics is a legitimate concern, but this doesn't change the established facts concerning AGW.
danleeuk 1 year ago
64 retards disliked this video.
HA!
Yourebuying 1 year ago 2
The core issue is what some individuals will do to "fix" the carbon problem. Will they, whomever "they" are, resort to murder and oppression, all under the guise of saving Mother Earth? Stalin, Hitler, Mao...all dictators have used economic, scientific, and religious justifications for the betterment of their societies. So, is there an open movement to depopulate the planet by any means? I honestly don't know. But knowing history, I wouldn't put it past corrupt, evil men and women to try.
augustandjune 1 year ago
just watched this video. No wonder people are whipped into a frenzy and calling global warming a hoax. There are too many people on the planet and if everyone keeps having 4 or more kids especially in developing countries, I see nothing wrong with birth control for the women who want it. If there is an evil group who are still in favor of Eugenics, who are they? Don't tell me Bill Gates, Oprah, etc. would be for this. On the other hand, the Koch Brothers are probably funding it.
bsonder 1 year ago
Exellent, excellent, must share with all.
ddsharper 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TRUTH, TRUTH, TRUTH!
msaintpc 1 year ago
Seriously all the detractors below are either totally ignorant or plants who feign ignorance.
globalistbrat 1 year ago
Global warming is a new religion that Al Gore and David Suzuki are trying to impose upon the world. Al: "Look! Here is a problem and only Me and Dave can help save you! Fork over your earnings to us (in the form of carbon taxes and subsidies for green businesses) and your salvation and that of the rest of the world will be ensured!" Don't beleive their lies. Resist.
harbar3000 1 year ago
@harbar3000 I'm sorry, but the evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to the fact that global warming is happening and is in part being caused by humankind. That's the consensus. Why don't you trust the consensus?
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD
rofls...
no comment. just do some research...
TekkGnostic 1 year ago
@TekkGnostic What research do you suggest I do? Trawl conspiracy websites?
Why don't you trust the scientific consensus (practically the entire scientific community, bar a few at the margins) and the environmental movement? Why would they be lieing?
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@harbar3000 Global warming is a religion? Oh, come on. The entire scientific field is lieing, are they? Why?
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD The whole scientific field? Really? The ones that do "lie" sure do get a lot of funding, don't they? What happens to the ones that go against the CO2 scam? At least a large portion of the scientific field now agree the ice cores show that rising CO2 levels actually follow rising temperatures, not the inverse.
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin Yes, the entire scientific world (bar a few on the margins, (like young earth creationists), and environmentalists, scientific institutions (which are in no doubt whatsoever), are all colluding to fool people into thinking that global warming is happening and that our species is contributing to it? Why would they do that? So, yes, bar a few, the entire scientific field.
On "the ones that lie", as you say - what are you claiming, and what is your evidence?
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@austinallenfin There are scientists who say that the world is 6,000 years old. There are very few of them on the fringes, but they do exist. And people who agree with them will say things like what you just said: What happens to the ones that go against the evolution myth? Their evidence is discounted, and they themselves are laughed at.
Similarly, climate skeptics who have submitted data for peer-review have it blown away. Because their evidence doesn't hold up to tests. That's science.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Partial list - notable scientists- global warming not man made: Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; David Bellamy, botanist; Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, Chris de Freitas, Associate Professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science; David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, University of Rochester: William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus Colorado State University; Philip Stott, Professor Emeritus University of London
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin You didn't answer any of my reasonable questions - fair enough.
I'm well aware that there's (very very few) scientists on the margins who question the science behind global warming. There's no need to list names, in order to create a false impression that your claims have credibility. Are they climate scientists? Why would you credit a 'botanist' and an 'astronomer'?
You missed my entire point. The scientific consensus is that global warming is being driven by humankind.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@austinallenfin (continued)...is being driven by humankind. So why would you question the scientific consensus? You and I (I presume you're not a scientist) cannot interpret the science. How could every scientist on the planet (bar a few) be in on a vast conspiracy to fool people? Why would they do this? Are you telling me the science is not sound?
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD The majority of scientists in the early 20th century supported eugenics. Eugenics was considered a science taught at Universities all over the world including Harvard, Yale, and Standford. Eugenics received massive funding & support from the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Institution. It inspired Hitler & the Holocaust. Was that good "science?" You are being conned by those poised to profit off carbon capture. It is a scam & will not decrease fossil fuel consumption.
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin The majority of scientists in the early 20th century did not support eugenics. It was supported by very few, and seen as a pseudo-science by most. If you have a source for your claim that "the majority of scientists" supported eugenics, present it.
Whether eugenics is ethical or not is a totally different issue to the fact of whether science supports certain elements of eugenics, as it no doubt does (it's basically breeding for desired traits).
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@austinallenfin If you can tell me what eugenics has to do with the discussion of global warming - I'd love to hear it.
There are scientists who have supported horrible atrocities, developed nuclear weapons etc etc - what has that got to do with evidence for global warming? If some scientists are or have been unethical in the past (like any professional field; take you pick) that tells you virtually nothing about evidence for global warming.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@austinallenfin You rightly ask "Was that good science?" No it wasn't, and it was recognized as bad science at the time by the majority of scientists, and it recognized as such today.
This is all irrelevant, unless you can tell me what eugenics has to do with global warming.
If you claim I'm by "conned" by those poised to profit off carbon capture, I have a few comments. I could as easily say you're being conned by those posted to profit off delusion and conspiracy theories (Exxon etc).
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
Comment removed
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Exxon will make billions off carbon capture as will Shell, BP, Halliburton. These are the companies that have been funding your scientific "peer reviewed" research. It has been shown in ice core studies CO2 levels follow warming patterns and not the inverse. Just take a look at any of the previously mentioned big oil companies' websites and search carbon capture. You will see who is driving this. And don't forget about financial houses trading carbon credits (next bubble)
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin Sorry, but Exxon as I understand it, have been funding the paranoid brigade. Look it up.
It doesn't make sense that these companies would be "funding" scientific peer-reviewed research - when most companies are opposed to global warming, and back skepticism. Also, the science is not something that can be "funded" in the corrupt fashion you mention - it's either true or it isn't and is subject to tests. Virtually every scientist in the world agrees on the science.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Actually, when I do any search with the words (Exxon & carbon dioxide) I find that Exxon supports Carbon Tax legislation. What can I tell you? What oil companies are opposed to CO2 caused global warming? Big Oil is all for CO2 CCS. They are poised to make billions off it. The more legislation passed in the CO2 direction, the more profitable CO2 will be as a waste product. In regards to your view of science; It sound nice. I wish I could go back to seeing it that way.
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin The mainstream "science" follows the funding. What exactly has been proven about the relationship of CO2 and global warming? All that has been shown is that there is a correlation between rising temperatures and rising CO2 levels, however this correlation has been twisted for a purpose (Al Gore left out which is the cause and which is the effect). It has been found in ice core studies that global warming actually precedes rising CO2 levels. Are you aware of this?
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin I could also say that you're being conned by the paranoid industry in the US and elsewhere, who are dedicated to sending irrational people into a frenzy of hysteria on conspiracies like this that make no sense.
You claim global warming is a scam.
Are you telling me that every scientist on the planet (bar a few), and every scientific institution (all of them), and environmentalists etc, are conspiring to make a quick buck from carbon taxes etc? That's crazy and makes no sense.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@BrideAndGroomFilmsHD I am saying that global warming is not being caused by man-made CO2 emissions. That is all I have been saying. The scientific frenzy over "man made" global warming is cause for concern and reminiscent of the eugenics frenzy of the early 20th century that spawned the Jewish Holocaust in Nazi Germany. Believe what you will.
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office."
-Aesop
austinallenfin 1 year ago
@austinallenfin One reason why it's so crazy (beyond the glaringly obvious fact that millions of people couldn't possibly keep a secret like this) is that the science supports the scientific consensus. Any outsider with a knowledge of these issues can come in and interpret the evidence. The great thing about science is that something is either true or it isn't.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
@austinallenfin On global warming, the science so overwhelmingly proves that humankind is driving our species to the grave that it takes effort not to perceive it. It takes very special people to perceive the opposite, so I must congratulate you.
BrideAndGroomFilmsHD 1 year ago
You're one sick paranoiac my friend, the issue is about POLLUTION, the point is to find CLEANER ways to live, not to kill everyone, it doesn't even have anything to do with genes.
Why the hell would governments spend loads of money into healthcare systems, which by the way are FOR THE POOR, when they'd want to eliminate them by using a grand ''Global warming'' scheme?
How can you possibly link Global warming with the Holocaust? Are you Glenn Beck or something?
CoqPwner 1 year ago
@CoqPwner Do you know anything about T Malthus? If you do not, then read a bit before making comments
globalistbrat 1 year ago
@CoqPwner go get some education, learn educate yourself and get a life, you make no sense at all! listen to the guy you might and I say again might learn something, if it is not too late for you!
pakraduni10 1 year ago
Wtf
CoqPwner 1 year ago
0:01-0:07
Like the Belmonts, Mega Man and Mario.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
At the end of WWII, the Nazis in the Nuremburg docket for war crimes fully expected to be exonnerated by their American financial sponsors -- people like Rockefeller, Ford, Allen & Foster Dulles, Prescott Bush, companies including Standard Oil, IBM, AT&T, GM, GE, Ford AG -- and because their model for eugenics was an American innovation. They realized too late they had been played by even BIGGER criminal extremists. That's the legacy Americans have enabled themselves to be betrayed by.
starmanskye 1 year ago
And now we have Obama creating "national monuments" over our countries oil fields and natural resources.
These people are "Malthusians". If you don't know what that is, you better find out FAST, because they view us a petulance, and themselves as the cure.
"Rent taking" isn't good enough for them anymore. It's too slow. They're now completely removing the people from the resources, and doing it through executive powers using their media created demagogue.
FreedomsReigning 1 year ago 5
Gave some things to think about. Thank you :)
Again I appreciate the way you speak. Trusting people with their own intelligence rather than bullying or imposing upon them by yelling. Your pacing is nice too.
momentinpassing 2 years ago 8
Remember Sir Bob Geldof? Feed the World and we all wanted to help solve all the people starving in the world.
From what I understand, they have something like 14 children. Health workers introduced and tried to educate about contraception. As I said the Pope came alomg and said Do not take it. So...it carries on...all these babies are being born to die of starvation. Now this man is saying what exactly? Prince Bernard was not a Nazi. so what this man says is rubbish.
pammyoneto 2 years ago
@pammyoneto When people are educated, the number of children they have tends to drop. If an increase in certain populations is a short-term result of efforts to assist people out of starvation and into a good quality of life, then wouldn't that be acceptable? I think it is unreasonable to assume past failures negate the possibility of successes in the future. It is unreasonable to assume that sustainable societies cannot be built where fractured and distressed societies exist now.
momentinpassing 2 years ago
In my view, this increase you mention in certain populations is indeed a short term effort to assist people out of starvation. As those people I`m told have so many children in the hope at least one can survive into adulthood and help look after those that gave birth to them. In reality it becomes short term as many die from starvation. I am 51 years of age and throughout my lifetime to date there have always been these tragic scenes of people starving to death somewhere in the world.
pammyoneto 2 years ago
I don`t quite grasp what this man is saying. Rockerfella, I thought is a Jew.
Prins Bernard of the Netherlands I knew was German and married to Queen Julianna. Had no idea he was a Nazi as he lived with her in England during the Nazi occupation of Holland. As for trying to stop poor countries from as this man states `breeding`. I think contraception was introduced to kurb the birthing rates and starvation of babies. Then the pope came along and forbade it. con`t
pammyoneto 2 years ago
goood job man, need more people like you
albosss12 2 years ago 2
Follow the money...who owns the FED, IMF, World Bank to whom the carbon tax will be paid however indirectly? It would seem all roads lead to...the same ilk that caused WW I WWII, Kkorean war, Vietnam, Iraq...etc.?
There is a common religion among all prime causes...BAAL worship..isis, no doubt. Which cults believe in BAAL....Catholics, Islam, Hindu, Masonics, and the many secret groups.
Look, freedom will win...the cults will be put down. Follow the money...ah, bank power....
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago 3
god bless you, sir. and gods speed to the cause - removing the masonic madmen, responsible for the highest crimes against humanity, nature and god.
thepofmeister 2 years ago
say it how it is
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago
The quality of speechcraft is quite high. Keep up the dissent; shatter the irrational groupthink. Cheers.
bardolic 2 years ago
While early 20th century eugenics was often psuedo-science (especially that used by Hitler's National Socialists), we've gotten much better at it now. We can measure individual intellience in a much more scientfic way with much greater accuracy through IQ tests and we understand genetic heredity a lot more now. As politically incorrect as it may be there are indeed IQ differences between the social classes and between ethnic groups. But yes, the anti-human population control leftists are nuts.
TaskForceSixTwoSix 2 years ago
superb presentation!
keep up the great work educating the people
TheRainbowMatrix 2 years ago
Kudos to James for really stepping up the level of presentations lately. The message to enviro-mentalists was a watershed. You deserve the increased attention to your work. Arrigato!
milesian1 2 years ago
On You Tube search: (ancient science of climate change )
then watch David Laughing Horse
Robinson share a Native American
perspective on surviving past, present and future
Climate Change
KernvilleKate 2 years ago
BRILLIANT Report Mr. Corbett
elfling 2 years ago
Everyone should take a look at this.
The Truth will set you free.
dedecus 2 years ago 2
Nicely done, Mr. Corbett.
RCinPAWA 2 years ago
I think Jew is being paid to spew those lies repeatedly.
The sky is falling!!!!! The oceans are rising!!!!! And we'll burn up because of Co2!!!!!!!
Show me any two times in the past where seperated by a thousand yrs that have the same climate!
buddcinder 2 years ago
David Suzuki, Canada's top climate change guru, promotes birth control through education. He says that educating women around the world and offering some financial security will cause their reproduction to fall greatly.
From there, I extrapolate that David Suzuki is pro-abortion and would stand by when confronted with genocide.
After all, he knows there are too many humans on earth.
If we prove that humans are the cause of climate change, we'll be promoting genocide.
redcollargedeon 2 years ago
You're jump from one conclusion from the other makes no sense.
Reasons for large (4+ children) families in developing countries are often related to tradition, religious beliefs, infant mortality rates and the need for future family support.
So in an ideal world were less children died and you didn't need to rely on them so much in the future, he has a point.
Plus better education would mean birth control. Which is PRE-ABORTION, yeah?
How you get to genocide from that, I don't know.
ascolti 2 years ago
That's the magic of extrapolation: He's not telling us that human life is important. He never says that human life is important.
EVER.
In his mind, humans are the cause of our problems because there are too many of us.
I question your "Ideal world" by the way. There's no such thing. It means something different for every individual.
redcollargedeon 2 years ago
Mr Corbett. Please present to us the mainstream's phony depiction/interpretation of the COP15 protestors. I believe this is a staged attempt to downplay the real political and economical descent towards the organizers/conspirators and instead portray the protestors as a bunch of frustrated individuals seeking more action than words regarding climate change legislation. As you have already presented to us so very well, these lying thieves have highjacked the cause, and now the opposition.
ozziindaus 2 years ago 2
great info... 5*****
TheFreedomWatch 2 years ago
you are an idiot
AndyITALY07 2 years ago
Comment removed
OurLordLennon 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen in my life. Nobody is proposing eugenics for the third world. The one thing this ignoramus doesn't discuss are the facts: human output of CO2 is rapidly changing the earth's climate. You may not like potential policy implications -- but facts are stubborn things, and those are the facts.
jewy 2 years ago
You're a good example of why once upon a time not everyone was allowed to vote.
You hate humanity so much that you're willing to pretend that starvation does not exist, and that the state has never figured out that they can use food and deindustrialization as weapons in targeted depopulation.
These warmists make the Nazi war criminals look like amateurs. You as a "eugenics denier" fall into that camp, which may explain why you're hiding behind that pathetic handle as cover.
FreedomsReigning 2 years ago 3
@jewy
Will you be on the band wagon when try to tell us that O2 is a poison? Get a life! Plants need co2. in turn they give us o2.
We are at 350 ppm co2.......plants thrive at 1800-2000 ppm co2.
Why not speak of the true poisons that are being put into the air. sulphur,CO, lead,
buddcinder 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@buddcinder Every living thing on the planet needs water, but if your mama held your under water until the thrashing stopped you would be rightly concerned about the effects of too much water. When you increase the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, the temperature increases. This isn't even remotely controversial -- in fact we've known about the greenhouse effect since the 19th century.
jewy 2 years ago
@jewy Obviously you've been watching the world with your eyes closed. Temp on Earth rise before Co2 by nearly 800 yrs. You have been proven wrong on that issue and the hockey will go down in history as snake oil.
buddcinder 2 years ago
Hi Jewy, actually... they are. It's the proposal of the UN that stringent measures are made to curb population levels in developing nations in return for Carbon Offset trading values. So if a country implements a sterilisation program (voluntary of course) this is to be counted against their CO2 output.
As for CO2 levels. Currently they are estimated to be 0.028% of the atmosphere of our planet. At current levels of increase by 2100 it will be 0.030%.
ascolti 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ascolti Limiting population growth (education, family planning, etc.) isn't the same thing as imposing eugenics. Stupid red herring. But that's the least stupid thing in your post.
CO2 is only .028% of the atmosphere? Well you're absurdly wrong -- it's currently .038%. .035% is the safe upper limit for CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere -- which we're well beyond already. If we were at .028% I wouldn't be worried about climate change either.
jewy 2 years ago
" If we were at .028% I wouldn't be worried about climate change either." I didn't realise you were a climate scientist, or a scientist. Is this the case?
ascolti 2 years ago
0.038%? Are you talking about Pieter Tans' Mauna Loa data set. Seriously?
If you'd bothered to read the article "Trends in Carbon Dioxide" rather than Wikipedia you'll have spotted the phrase "The Mauna Loa data are being obtained at an altitude of 3400 m in the northern subtropics, and may not be the same as the globally averaged CO2 concentration at the surface.." - and the fact that the last two years data are preliminary and "subject to change".
ascolti 2 years ago 3
Look @jewy, I'm not going to allow myself to get as rude and inflammatory as you have. Raging against everybody in this comment list who doesn't share you're view point isn't going to win the argument or make people change their opinions on your own viewpoint or the sort of person you are.
I'm sure there are a number of things we have in common. I'm an adherent to stronger pollution policy. But my concern is SO2 and so forth. Plus, I'm ready the CRU leaked files with informed eyes. Are you?
ascolti 2 years ago 2
Incidentally @jewy, somebody bumped you're comment down and I've bumped it back up. Because even though I think you're rude.
You are correct(ish). NASA have a balanced 350-375 ppm CO2 value. But as for a "safe limit", I'm not sure were that comes from. First up you'd have to subscribe to the theory before that would be valid. CO2 levels have been higher, during considerably LOWER temperatures.
What do you have to say for that? Or are you going to deny the science on that, as per CRU doctrine
ascolti 2 years ago 3
great replies!
thatstheguy07 2 years ago
that's it i'm subscribing.i would'nt reject the notion that the hoaxenhagen protesters were paid.any rational person can see that they want slavery.and alot of death.
taxisgay12 2 years ago 7
global warming is real. kthnxbye.
dxmakina 2 years ago
No... don't negate him. Global warming and cooling (it's cooling at present made) ARE real.
The real argument is whether CO2 and man kind is causing the effect or whether or not this is a natural process.
ascolti 2 years ago 2
@dxmakina: We know it's real.
We just don't believe human caused CO2 is responsable for it.
If anyone could just prove it, the debate would be over.
CO2 is not the problem. Plants love that stuff, or had you forgotten that?
redcollargedeon 2 years ago
@redcollargedeon so then lets instead tell people they should all have as many children as they want as the worldwide climate is changing for the unknown? lol yeah i'm sure nothing bad can happen.
dxmakina 2 years ago
Look, I'm not trying to be obnoxious here, I just reject carbon taxes.
You don't have to tell anyone to have as many kids as they want. Do you think the Muslim world is taking notice of the Climate Change debate? Is India taking drastic measures?
The only people who would listen to this are in the Western World. We're made to feel guilty about it and there's no proof that Carbon Taxes would make any difference.
But they do try to get our money, don't they.
It's BS. It's fraudulent.
redcollargedeon 2 years ago
Yes, but nobody can prove that it's man made.
I think it's caused by the sun.
But if you think CO2 will kill us all, maybe you can stop breathing right now. That might help, except that there are 8 billion humans who will continue to breath, so good luck with that CO2.
redcollargedeon 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
linking eugenics of the forties to todat is laughable. No one in the forties even knew about global warming. to link hitler with global warming is a great injustice. That while it is unpopular is also crazy. You will not be the first to oppose climate change. You're no George Washington, only a corporate patsy/luddite
bulletstastegreat 2 years ago
You either didn't listen to a thing he said or you're officially retarded.
Take a look at the corporate members list in the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR is fully backing this genocidal global warming pseudo science, JUST AS THE OIL COMPANIES ARE. Yet he's the "corporate patsy/ludite"?
After WW2 the eugenics movement chose "population control" and "environmentalism" as their new euphemisms to operate under. It isn't even debatable.
FreedomsReigning 2 years ago 3
I don't think he does suggest Hitler used global warming.
He was merely showing how a similar outcome can be sought using a new rational. To which he makes a good point.
Having actually read ALL the 160mb of the leaked emails, documents, source code and data... I'm very much inclined to agree with the opinion that a lot of pseudo science has been going on and that remarks and indeed conclusions have been given out that are exaggerated at best, outright lies in other cases.
ascolti 2 years ago 2
where can i find these leaked emails?
ticalionstalionboooo 2 years ago
wikileaks {dot} org has a number of sources for the files. They are in a 61mb zip file.
ascolti 2 years ago
Excellent concise rendering of the history of the families, the foundations and events involved in the BIG PICTURE of eugenics and the environmental fraud scam to take-over the world. It is so easy to see the big picture and KNOW that this sinister plan is in progress after you know the history of the "SocialIST Biologists"...Well done James Corbett !! Thank you for making an excellent video that I can store in a Blackberry and whip it out anytime I come across someone needing AND wanting info
IMNumber6 2 years ago 3
James, perhaps you a yet another great hero standing against great evil. NEVER stop being the brilliant man that you are!
emforu 2 years ago 2
Truly excellent commentary on the monster class and their eugenics agenda.
greenback001 2 years ago
Epic post!! This get's added to my my "eugenics" playlist.
FreedomsReigning 2 years ago 3
Valuable info!
Very well done!
Arigato, James-san!
Tressco 2 years ago 2
Very well stated sir! Keep up the great work. These short statements are perfect to help set the seeds needed to open folks eyes and ears to what is going on in this world.
47sam 2 years ago 4
Superb, Mr Corbett, I have read a lot on this topic and it is refreshing to see someone with your following discuss it openly and eloquently. The Huxley brothers, Aldous and Julian, writer and founder of UNESCO is little discussed. Brave New World was less fiction and more prediction. Keep going my friend, people are listening.
jesuispret69 2 years ago 4
excellent vid keep em' coming bro.
LBFoxDaChunin 2 years ago 5
Not that its not already going on through water fluoridation, sodium benzoate, aspartame, depleted uranium, HIV in vaccinations, mercury in vaccinations, live cancer viruses in vaccinations, GMO's, plans like codex alimentarius and Monsanto taking over foods, prescription drugs the forth leading cause of death in the US right now. Etc.....
1freedomfighter11 2 years ago 5
Incredibly articulate! Thanks for this great video James.
iwantgmail 2 years ago 10
Clear speech defined. Keep-up the great work.
duckymear 2 years ago 9
Thanks for this James. Well done!
CATO316 2 years ago 5
Thank you, James, for the information.
God help us all.
whitmts 2 years ago 5
this post contains so much that you have to go through it again and again and look into the whole theme of eugenics, its history, the players behind it back then and today and connect all the dots. the fact that soros is calling for china to take a more leading role in the NWO, rockefeller praising china in 1973 for being a successful model fits so much in the big picture. these people are hardcore nazis and have to be stopped!!!
wdcsucks1 2 years ago 6
so true, James.......i wish those who would listen could hear these words, and those who are on the other side would repent of there deedsand failed ideology.....thank you for your bravery, and truth
777Marlene 2 years ago 4
Amazing speech my friend.
rikestard 2 years ago 5
How do we stop these politicians from making this criminal laws? My senators and congress member are e-mailing me plugging Global Warming with great enthusiasm. They never listen to me.
The MSM is down playing or ignoring Climategate.
Obama has been connected to the Chicago Climate Exchange for many years.
What can I do to help?
Whorulesnow 2 years ago 2
Thank you James, as always...a (very) good job!
fredontube 2 years ago 2
Its not only the 3rd World nations that are now being targeted its the entire human race. Apart from the elite and their extended families of course.
sheepinnit 2 years ago
You're blowing it wide open...nice!
FrenchConcrete 2 years ago 3
5 stars- Absolutely excellent video!
sarahsgift1 2 years ago 2
That speech was inherently moving. Thanks much for the great report, James.
DaUndagroundRailroad 2 years ago 2
It is extremely clear from this video that:
A) You have a very powerful brain.
B) I can see no way in which what you said could have been spoken any better. Absolutely fantasitc reporting.
C) All of humanity cannot thank you enough for your insights and caring.
D) People like you can make a difference.
Thank you so much, all the best to you.
EnergySupply2008 2 years ago 4
Monumental.
These words should be engraved.
envisioner 2 years ago 2
Thanks for this. Well done.
bardolic 2 years ago
before the video got to 33 seconds i was hit this is what people need
NUMBLIFEUSA 2 years ago
Excellent clip. Well done.
cabgt 2 years ago 2
Absolutely on the money; this commentary is better than any MSM commentator.
First it was 'racial purty' the cause celebre for genocide; Now it's 'environmental purity' that gives rise to the same spirit that brought about WW II, and the NAZI party.
So environmentalism is the rebirth of the same eugenicist ideals that brought about mass culling of populations.
matrxmax 2 years ago 3
Excellent background of the Eugenics/Overpopulation movement. Knowledge is power. It also is the key to debunk inhumane and immoral causes like Eugenics or whatever name is used to disguise it.
MyCashDynasty 2 years ago 2
The people pushing for the Copenhagen agreement are way worse than Nazis.
YouDoobed 2 years ago 4
The same twisted argument could be twisted further to turn the tables around. Since fossil fuel consumption is proportional to wealth, the rich having big SUVs, RVs, yachts, private planes, mansions, etc, then you could argue that the most effective way to reduce the carbon footprint would be to eliminate the rich. How ironic. I am against eugenics. It is just a power grab for more control.
countryhorsefive 2 years ago
yes nazi is a very misused term. politically they nazi party was left wing although not as left wing as communism. comminism /fascism= same thing, rule of the many by the divine right of kings from god.
COUNTCARDULAR 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If you don't like someone, compare them to the Nazis. This strategy seems to go down well with your core audience.
spamcrud 2 years ago
the enviro zombies are eugenists. They intend to impose massive carbon taxes on the developing countries...which are dealing with extreme poverty and starvation because of these taxes ..gas and energy prices will skyrocket as will the price of food and all commodities. This is eugenics and genocide.
TheIsis1123 2 years ago
Good vid to establish existence of eugenics to this day.
alleyghost 2 years ago 4
as a man of the Earth who works to raise consciousness around RESPECT & REVERENCE for the Rain Forest and the 1st sustainable environment, THE HUMAN BODY TEMPLE: i have "smelled a rat" with these well meaning, misguided, bamboozled, duped environmentalists vilifying ppl and oil companies for their carbon footprint as the drive or fly to their protests!
WTF! can i get a witness james?! you put words to my feelings!
certifiedhealthnut 2 years ago
5 starts on the vid!
how ever i think you vids are to high quality or bit-rate or something because the load extremely slow
lllraverslll 2 years ago
We should use their own philosophy agianst them. If anyone needs to be eliminated from the gene pool it is the ones who have made themselves filthy, stinking rich through the use of fraud. Bankers and politicians are at the top of that list!
I mean really, which do you think does society more damage, ten honest but simple-minded people or one con-artist?
dlucas90 2 years ago 4
Thanks for your serious research
WhoAreYouPointingAt 2 years ago
This is one of your best movies ever made James!
Xeogt 2 years ago
Fukin A!!!! James
I wonder why these talking heads on Fox and CNN etc can be paid $50 million a year when there is some real reporting talent out there.
Don't hold your breath for that $50million James.
Great stuff - Ta
zalida100 2 years ago 2
Awesome and inspiring!
magichandpuppet 2 years ago
That was one of the most beautiful statements I have heard.
LuminousViews 2 years ago 2
I refuse to go down in history as some brainwashed collectivist pandering to eugenics, and genocide.
It's not just our "right" to speak out against this eugenic pseudo science called "climate change", it's our DUTY.
FreedomsReigning 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This carbon trading scheme does not serve the interests of social justice. Quite the opposite. What is now being contemplated is a multibillion trade in Carbon Derivatives: the banks are slated "to make a killing" on carbon trading, with massive fraud and insider trading in the carbon trading markets. The Multibillion Trade in Carbon Derivatives, Global Research,the architect of Credit Default Swaps at JP Morgan is behind the development of a trading system in "Carbon Derivatives". GoldmineSAX
louis12346 2 years ago
beautifully worded and expressed!!!! Excellent video.
chudnovsky 2 years ago 2
you always do a wonderful job........
skybirdbird 2 years ago 2
from the bottom of my heart I salute you
KlipKlep 2 years ago 2
Walt Disney was a eugenics asshole as well. Planned Parenthood was started by a eugenics doctor also.
FarangBalls 2 years ago 2
mrmoodan idiot --- you go james
FreedomAtRisk 2 years ago 2
Dear Mr Corbett,
A hero leaked the emails? Previously it has been reported that carbongate emails came from a Russian hacker? Please explain.
Thanks,
MrMooDang
MrMoodang 2 years ago
yep , a hacker , the most demonized of all people becomes the hero
jmm1233 2 years ago 2
regardless of who the person was or where he came from he is still by all means a hero for what he or they did, I see nothing wrong with your questions MrMooDang and I apologize for the shitty replies to it, Unless I am mistaken by your wanting to know.
TheDudeRulez09 2 years ago
Thanks, I've been a longtime fan of the Corbett Report. I am sympathetic with his views, but it makes me uncomfortable to see him charging this debate with emotional rhetoric. There's already enough hyperbole out there. Sober investigative reporting unafraid to tackle controversial issues is what middle class America sorely needs -- and which we certainly don't get from the mainstream media (or from the high profile Alex Jones). I think Corbett is the man for the job:-)
MrMoodang 2 years ago
One of the BIG problems in our society is this notion that if you inject an appropriate emotional element to an argument is somehow inferior to a dispassionate presentation. Sometimes it's true, sometimes it's not at all true. If I'm having a heart attack, I want someone to SCREAM for help and communicate the urgency of the situation, not some calm dispassionate dialog that doesn't. We have man URGENT situations that must carry the emotional reality when we discuss them.
TPOCS 2 years ago
Agreed. Lack of passionate conviction is at the root of our predicament. But passion if misguided is no better than pedantic dithering. Passion informed by knowledge is vital for a healthy society...especially now with issues as perplexing and potentially perilous as climate change and world government. A sure footing is needed upon which to take a stand!
MrMoodang 2 years ago
Fantastic work, James.
Gravija1980 2 years ago
Alex Jones & David Icke,were the first,they were ridiculed. And even attacked,now they're listened to,were starting to wake up & beginning to resist!
crypter27 2 years ago 3
Bravery
diogeneslaertius666 2 years ago
Great commentary and reporting.
deke76 2 years ago 2
excellent report...thank you!
debtruth1 2 years ago 2
Great Report James!
1776isBACK 2 years ago 2
The perfect expose detailing why the Elite plan to make billions off a plan which has already and continues to starve millions of innocents in the third world to death.
Thank you, James Corbett !
johnkulaya 2 years ago
Excellent speach!
ccodling 2 years ago
very concise vid well done
icfree 2 years ago
I had to pause at 6:13 because I couldn't wait to say how brilliant and masterfully done this is.
Everyone help spread this video as much as you can because this is beautifully written and perfectly concise.
Very well done!
yorkshirepuddiiing 2 years ago 2