Nine Scientists Find Active Nano-thermite in 9/11 WTC Dust -- April 6, 2009

[dreamdiction]

Nobody can find any non-Jewish 9/11 'debunkers' who really exist in real life.

Israel can't stand on their own economically and they need the US to fight their wars for them. Israel is terrified of loosing US$3 Billion per year from US taxpayers so all the liars posting 911 debunking comments on youtube are guilty Israeli parasites pretending to be innocent Americans.

Israel attacked America on 9/11.

[zenoist2]

I wonder how that got there?

Its only used for demolition and is a strictly controlled substance thats all.

[Magnuspire]

Aluminum and Iron dust? Did they not consider the fact that the building is built using IRON and the planes are aluminum? >.>

[cybermental]

@Magnuspire idiot.

[Magnuspire]

@cybermental Some people have no sense of humor. -_-

[adeadlysniper]

If you do the research, you'll find that all the authors are affiliated to 9/11 truth organizations, and that the paper itself was submitted to a crap journal with no peer reviewing whatsoever.

Here's the link: bentham-open . org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/20­09/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ . SGM

[donbole1]

well, the FBI director NY has not refuted the question/accusation of the government painting the nano-thermite in the buildings...all he has said was that special operation members in the military have done things they did not like, but cannot tell anyone about what they have done...tells me that he is concealing the truth about the government doing it...

[donbole1]

as well as the government got rid of all the "evidence" of the steel right away...plus the fact that they state that the black boxes from aircraft could not be found...but there are witnesses that had seen all 4 boxes, plus the NTSB states that that is virtually impossible not to find, because in ALL prior plane accident, they have been found...the NTSB does not believe the FBI...one other thing...

[donbole1]

if the government knew there were terrorists that high jacked aircraftaccording to the law of the land, fighter jets were supposed to be dispatched and literally shoot down the aircraftwhy did this not happen?

[MrJnoman]

@donbole1 because NORAD was conducting training excercises that same day leaving some 14 or so planes to protect the entire country, kinda fishy huh?

[elektron2kim]

Those towers could not fall at that 'free fall' speed unless they got demolished by using thermite and loads of explosions. Such a demolish job takes weeks to prepare. However, I wonder more about the idea that terrorists from the Arab world could have transported tons of thermite, explosives and detonators into those buildings, drilled 1000s of holes and wired it all up without being notised. I await justice to the correct gang of people behind this.

[beancube2008]

The 9/11 truths are more scary than the terrorists but how many kids will remember we have the public examined all evidences presented. All close ring key witnesses will be executed. CIA are going to make those stupid religious fanetics continue to believe they're the heroes going to die for their people and refuse to give us all the details bits and pieces they knew and didn't know.

[throttlelever]

Good job. BUT ... why do these scientist fail to analayze the EMP effects on surrounding cars?

[fredontube]

Groundbreaking!

[ProjectShiningCity]

More evidence. More independent research by folks like us will either prove or disprove the theory. Yet the law allows for the conviction of someone through "preponderance" of evidence? Keep at it!

[orangevalesweetpea]

mummyfunk, honey I think you need to keep up with your therapy, since it isnt doing much good. And I would strongly suggest a course in grammar. And one more thing hon, maybe you should switch to decaf? If not, I think you might just pop an artey with all the ignorance and anger you hurl at people who DO know what really happened on that horrible day that *I* personally lost so many friends. How old are you? You talk like, well, a seventh grader. Lighten up for your own health, K?

[the14u36]

no one came forward because these people are all burried in the desert with the plain. there is viedo footage of that plan landing. so where did it go. was hijacked by the goverment and burried in the desert all on board

[WELLGURU]

The planes were offloaded at a military base and the passengers were loaded onto a military plane could this really happen /"? why has no one come forward ? all these souls involved must have seen something ! Well NO, proof is those seven Nukes that were signed out for and transported over American soil ,stored on the other side of a base , mounds of paper work needed , no one asked WHY? this is still a false flag failure and yet no loses sleep., M-law is comin folks !!

[schpyy]

Excelent, another step in the right direction. Slowly but surely the rest of the world goes forward and supports USA in finding the answers.

[GodGunsGutsGlory]

That would be a good thing.

[mooners40]

true patriots want the truth - examine all evidence - ALL - and find the answers - this is another step and another big piece in the puzzle and no one will forget - the truth is the TRUTH - listen to the facts ! The average American isn't listening coz of media control and propoganda - if they were shown the facts there would be a revolution

[cooperativist]

Thank you so much, with this proof we will be able to stop the attempt of our government to take our inalienable rights.

[911insidejob81]

thanks for video

[mehdiuk]

one thing, what did media say was the cause of building 7 collapse?

[PatriotReport]

Fire. It happened only three times in the history of the world, all on the same day:  September 11, 2001.

There has never been a high-rise steel-structured building collapse by fire before 9/11 and never after. Remember that the WTC architects and engineers said that the buildings were designed to withstand muliple direct airline impacts and the ensuing fires.

I'll let you do the rest....

[mehdiuk]

agree, surely if the casue of the collapse was fire, the building must have leaned over and gradully fallen, but apparently in this case it was super fire and building collapsed in 6.5 sec :)

did fire get to the building 7 from the other two buildings?

[PatriotReport]

Yes, it sustained minor debris damage. Nothing that would have caused a global simultaneous collapse of all supports at the speed of gravity. That is preposterous and can only be acheived with demolition. WTC7 was the smoking gun; this journal is the loaded gun.

[ValiantArrow]

chill little hitler!

[WELLGURU]

yES its possible the nano T, was brought in early, Was not Bushes Brother in charge of security ? it would really be somthing if this Gov., was involved this deep -deeper then just turning a blind eye to what happened which is the very least that happened . The shut down those towers for the first time before 911, they removed the dogs security was shut off however there sure looks like somthing is under those planes ? maybe remote control devices either way NANO is there,.

[JonnyPxN]

@PatriotReport Hilarious. "There has never been a high-rise steel-structured building collapse by fire " You are ABSOLUTELY correct. But there was ofc the fact that 200 tonne airplanes flyed into both wtc1 and 2 with 8,000 gallons of fuel apiece travelling at 250mph+. I dont think any steel structure has had that aswell no?

[PatriotReport]

@JonnyPxN The towers were designed specifically for this. Did you not see/read the architects statements? You could have hit the building with several planes and it would have held. They are redundant structures designed to shift loads and stresses and were "specifically designed and built to withstand a large direct aircraft impact."

I highly encourage you to educate yourself better and then come back and we'll talk.

[JonnyPxN]

@PatriotReport I love "twoofers" like you. You tell me to educate myself, and yet the VAST majority of conspiracy theorists have no relevant qualifications. You give us these ridiculous theories and yet not a single proper scientists has EVER had their findings published in a respected peer reviewed jkournals like "Nature" or "Science". Only journals created BY twoofers FOR twoofers like 9/11 journal. And you are wrong on the "towers designed specifically for this"

[JonnyPxN]

@PatriotReport as since the towers were designed in the 1960's, well before the 767 came out, they were designed to stay up if hit by a 707, an aircraft 25 percent smaller than a 767 with a lower top speed. "Investigators were unable to locate any documentation of the criteria and method used in the impact analysis and, therefore, were unable to verify the assertion that “… such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse by a Boeing 707"

[PatriotReport]

@JonnyPxN Even if you were correct, there is a preponderance of evidence that if I was on a jury in court I would vote Demolition. I have been studying 9/11 since 2007 and the amount of evidence from hundreds of sources is overwhelming and solid. It is almost endless and don't have the time to list it all for you. Check out my favorites and go to ae911truth. org for starters.

[JonnyPxN]

@PatriotReport So you have been studying this event since 2007? Have you got a masters or PHD in a relevant field such as mechanical/civil/demolitions engineering? All the papers researched and peer reviewed in respectable journals have at least masters. Secondly, i went on the website, it has 1460 members. Apart from the fact that architechts design the building and would no way in hell know hot it collapses, (job of mechanical and civil engineers for actual structural blueprints), 1460

[JonnyPxN]

There are 233,000 architects and 1.5 million engineers. 1460 represents LESS THAN 0.1 percent! If it was such an obv thing, why so few advocates? And don't give me that BS that they're too scared or its a conspiracy, if it was that obv there would still be tonnes of people with the RELEVANT qualification speaking out! Also I love looking at scholars for 911 truth as well as AE, because "scholars" means ANYONE! look at their "members" section, 9/10 have no engineering degree at all!

[PatriotReport]

@JonnyPxN Surely you know the answer to your facetious question. The masses are brainwashed sheep and believe the lies spewed by the MSM. The government owns the MSM and tell us only what they want us to know. That's why there aren't more architects and enginneers on board. I'm done now.

[JonnyPxN]

@PatriotReport Excellent! You have proved yourself to be a brainwashed armchair expert, who apparently knows more about the NWO, the 9/11 atrocities and huge government conspiracies than even those relevantly qualified! I can make a few assumptions here. A) You have no relevant qualifications b) You are from America c) You are republican, possibly saying "no im libertarian", but all your policies are right wing, and d) you'd like Christianity to be the state religion aswell! Bye!

[PatriotReport]

@JonnyPxN Nope. I don't buy into the Divide and Conquer scheme--they're both controlled by the central bankers. America was founded on Christianity but I believe in freedom of religion for all.

BTW, I am qualified because I am human, and I have a brain to think with, as do all. The academics do not best Common Sense, indeed, their job in this corrupt regime is to corrupt Common Sense.

[JonnyPxN]

US was not founded on Christianity,many of the founding fathers were deists not theists, and the first amendment has a little something called "the seperation of church and state" BTW you are not qualified because you are challenging peer reviewed articles written by university professors with qualifications in the relevant field coming out of their ears, and you have what? "A brain". Oh, because that makes you qualified of course! I'd rather stick to the guy with a PHD in mech. engineering tbh.

[cybermental]

@JonnyPxN Not everybody in a technical field is an engineer einstein.

[JonnyPxN]

@cybermental LOL! Go on their website, to their "members section". Most of them aren't even in the relevant FIELD, let alone have the relevant qualifications. A brief list of "scholars"- a biology student, fashion student, politics professor, I.T. systems student. LOL!

[cybermental]

@JonnyPxN Rocket fuel wont burn the iron in a manner consistant with 911 iron wreckage.

[smudge6699]

They didn't but it was to get rid of all the Enron records from Arthur Anderson that were stored there.

How convenient!

[sensless1mc]

I heard them talking about this on coast to coast radio.....hard to debunk facts.

[Bittermanscolon]

C'mon people, put it all together. You've been lied to on a huge scale.

[mythicalpoet]

I've been telling this to people for years. Maybe the sheeple will finally wake up? This finding is irrefutable and the shills cannot twist and lie their way out it.

[29kalel]

i been believing it was setup. days after the towers fell at the very bottom the support beams were slit in angles and still burning that is signs of thermite, it takes forever for it to stop burning

[HENN3H]

I think thats because one of the active components is rust, which is constantly oxidating, which makes it burn so ridiculously long

[thelyyht]

That struck me as odd also and never sat right. It didn't make sense to me that those fires would burn for weeks and was still so hot nobody could enter. It also explains how the people were actually disintegrated to dust with hardly any remains found. I first learned of this substance watching Terminator the SC Chronicles of all things. How ironic. Now it all makes sense.

[Gilgamesh73]

Glad you got this video up too.  It's over... I can finally get some rest.....

[babakpardes]

Same here. After years being mocked as terrorist lover.

[CitizenPatriot]

never spoken on our own shores but the world knows Americans can be so compromised