She isnt talking to anyone. There is no towers. She is just talking to Siri and because there is some noise she holds the cellphone to her ear. Simple. >_>
If it is a early version of an hearing aid the hearing aids in 1920's are huge and at 3:31 you can see a white two squared object in her hand O_O my phone is also white and no one is around her when shes talking WTF????!!!!!!!
I don't see any physical device in her hand. I see just her holding her hand to her head in an excited self ranting type of manner. Sort of how people hold their hands over their mouth or around other parts of their head. Just a way of expressing themselves. Time travel can't exist because of the grandfather paradox.
Kinda looked like she ws scratching her head and talking to herself. I don't imagine that when we invent time travel devices, we will send a cross dressing lunatic to the past.
So, if you were a time traveler wouldn't talking on a cell phone blow your cover a bit? Also, wouldn't you need to bring a cell phone tower with you as well? Also, why doesn't anyone show any particular interest in this person's cavalier use of technology from the future?
she's hiding her face from the camera retard, in 1928 cameras were the size of a mack truck and pretty hard to hide from the public when you film them.
you can clearly see that its a man with a object cuffed around his ear. if you look closely her face actually has a male face. but yeah thats deff a phone
William Shockley,John Bardeen,Walter Houser Brattain of Bell Lab.Can you hear me now! in 1927.AM ,Amplitude modulation.In the mid-1870s, a form of amplitude modulation—initially called "undulatory currents"—was the first method to successfully produce quality audio over telephone lines. Beginning with Reginald Fessenden's audio demonstrations in 1906
A transistor radio is a small portable radio receiver using transistor-based circuitry. ... Bell Laboratories demonstrated the first transistor on December 23, 1947
That's is weird. Good catch. My thought? If that is a communications device? Then time travel may be involved? Or it may be a cross dresser that is talking to himself? :) Thumbs up to you.
@Maximus3087 I'm not doubting the video or you. Just strange to see someone, at that moment in time, talking into something in their hand.
I could download this and sharpen it up. Then enlarge it. I'm not going to. Too many other strange things going on. I need to attend to. (Just click my username.) :)
OK - WHO is she talking to? There were no cell phone towers, even in LA, in the 1920's. It looks like an early hearing aid to me. Even if it was a time traveler, they would have no one else to talk to since there is NO CELL SYSTEM.
I'´m sorry for those that don't believe it but, she's trully holding something, it's clear it's one of those mobiles we open, close - longer, you can see the other part in the end of her hand -, she's truly talking to somebody, because from the start she's talking, smiling. I don't believe in time travel, all this BS, but I guess Chaplin made another good joke of his... he probably read the prophecies about the future and decided to let this image for us... LOL LOL what a genius!
well after seeing that all i can think is this man/woman has fucked our timeline up, aka the butterfly affect, MABEY thats why we have such a high fucking tax rate, or wars that could of been provented.
i can tell you! these guy is doing a JOKE, like talkin in his hand like a super detective from the future, he s on a FILMSET, dont forget that! some folkes was in a mute of Sci-Fi and the beginning High Tech, this Guy is JOKING!!! Hes talkin to his Hand in a kind of a futuristic vision, THATS IT! I would do also! because its FUN!
In theory, time travel is considered a real possibility in science. The problem is as of 2010, we're not aware of anyone having created technology which would allow the opportunity to do this. However, let's say that someone in the year 2025 did develop the means and came back to today. This would mean that the present is actually the past, and the future is really the present. Which means, everything that you do as of this moment has already happened as you're simply catching up to that.
present time time which is in the futures past. You could go further in arguing that there's multiple dimensions, as there is the past-past, past-present, past-future, past-present, present, present-future the futures-future etc etc. Perhaps this is why so many of us experience deja vu or premonitions. Think about it, how many of you have known you were going to cut yourself before you cut yourself. Or thought about someone that you haven't seen in a long time...
prent time time which is in the futures past. You could go further in arguing that there's multiple dimensions, as there is the past-past, past-present, past-future, past-present, present, present-future the futures-future etc etc. Perhaps this is why so many of us experience deja vu or premonitions. Think about it, how many of you have known you were going to cut yourself before you cut yourself. Or thought about someone that you haven't seen in a long time...
and that you just happen to bump into them. Anything is possible including this time travelling women when you consider the idea of quantum mechanics
@areljl01 The first radio receiver/transmitter to be nick-named "Walkie-Talkie" was the backpacked Motorola SCR-300, created by an engineering team in 1940 at the Galvin Manufacturing Company (fore-runner of Motorola)
Its a Sonotone hearing aid, brand new in 1928, the latest gadget for the hard of hearing, it was marketed to wealthy old women and men. It looks like a mobile phone, but it isn't and as for why the woman was talking, she only began speaking just before she stopped walking and looked at the camera, it was quite obvious she was speaking to the cameraman/director in a "have I done it right?" way.
as Stephen Hawking said, if people could time travel, they'd be here now....telling us they were from the future. I think this is just something which "looks" like someone using a phone but there could be many explanations.
@2blakandbold You aren't making any sense and completely off topic. Get your thoughts together and try again when you have something meaningful to contribute to this video.
@2blakandbold you mean my unfortutane ability to be a rational thinking human being and not one to fall for silly and illogical conjectures as you do? Perhaps it may be a handicap in crazy land but I don't live in your crazy land.
@zer0dahero such as a very fast spaceship, one person is able to experience several days while another person simultaneously experiences only a few hours or minutes. The same two people can meet up again, one having experienced days or even years while the other has only experienced minutes. The person in the spaceship only needs to travel near to the speed of light. The faster they travel, the slower their time will pass relative to someone planted firmly on the Earth
wat a load of bollox wats all the fuss about. could be jus some crazy woman talkin to herself or to a piece of plastic. thanks for wastin 10 mins of my life u cunt.
What the heck is all the fuss about cell towers for? If you have the technology to time travel don't ya think they could come up with a communication device that can talk back to the future without cell towers?
Someone else tried to explain it as a woman scratching her head. I guess, that guy thought she was scratching and talking to her lice.
To me, she looks like a he. His shoes are as big or bigger than the man's shoes that is walking in front of her/him.
Has that one been digitally remastered? anything added or removed for effect? I wuld try to view the origional film to see it that is in there. It is also possible that the director may have just been kind of creative. Think of Jules Verne and how some of the ideas n his books were unthinkable at the time such as traveling to the moon, or circumnavigating the globe via air travel. Also, and to a lesser extent, think Ray Bradbury's book "Ferinheit 451";
ESTA ESCENA NO EXISTE EN LA PELICULA THE CIRCUS, ES UN INVENTO, Y SI COMPARAN ESTA ESCENA CON LA PELICULA VERDADERA SE VAN A DAR CUENTA DE L A DIFERENCIA EN LA TONALIDAD DE LOS GRISES. DENTRO DE TODO ES UNA BUENA IMITACION DE LOS FILMES DE ESA EPOCA.
seems strange that some are saying it's an hearing aid. because the lady would seem be using her hearing aid the wrong way as she has the mircrophone to her ear. she should have had an ear plug. check this site hearingaidmuseum com
@Tamakath dude i think they wouldnt need towers no more after they discover time travel , theyd have a little thing in the phone , or a speical one jst for time travel that requires no tower
maybe it's posible and she is a time travel ,BUT how can she use that device in 1928 ?
i mean in 1928 no mobile or device like that so it's means there is no network for mobile ! so if she is time travel and she bring that phone from future it's ok but she cant use it in 1928 BECUASE NO NETROWK FOR MOBILE
@roham1233 what if, on her "present" (time where she traveled from) time, signals are so strong that it travels through time, which if true means there are tons of people who time travels, and if so, then this indicates that this old lady is pretty dumb cuz she just tampered with time paradox O.O
It's not a phone and in no frame can you see a "thin, black device". At the end of the clip you can clearly see the womans hands begin to clench and it looks more like she's scratching her head. There are dozens of possible reasons for this footage and the last conclusion I'd jump to is time travel. Blatant trolling.
I think I have an actual explanation. The box set was remastered and released in september 2003 there were cell phones then. I believe that whoever remastered the movies threw that in to cause this exact reaction from people. Have you ever watched the reel to reel it was originally filmed and shown with. I will bet you won't see a woman on a cell phone in the original release of it.
A heavy matron is filmed in 1928 holding in one hand a large purse and packages, and in the other her black gloves, whilst trying to screw one of her screwable earrings, typical of the era, without much success; which likely makes her speak out-loud mild imprecations... And you all think she's gabbing away on a mobile? Really? Encase yourselves in a corset, yards of heavy wool, and get bothered by a pesky earring and intrusive cameramen, to see if you wouldn't have a meltdown too!
I think this is not about time traveling. I think the film was taking around 1950. The film is too clear to be from 1928. And the man (lady) is talking on a walkie talkie. I think the studio added the footage to sale the video, and stated that the extra footage was a part of the 1928 circus, but actually was taken much later. The device that he/she is talking on seems larger from a particular angle and look like a walkie talkie from the 1950's.
Maybe she was trying to receive direction from someone on her right and couldn't hear because of noise from the set on her left, thus she's covering that one ear.
its a 11G PDT4 IPHONE series (PDT4 means 4th generation of PARALLEL DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGY ) while 11G gives you access to internet and phone calls to future and the past via a high end micro universe chip, also you got a bonus feature called miniGOD that grands you 3 wishes even if one of them is for more wishes,
@ChewingWood it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@England22015 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
It is not possible but, when you reach the technology that allows you to travel in the time, you will probably using some other tech rather than normal cell phone.
@XTR3ME07 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@huseyinkara028 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
So wait let me get this one straight... She time triveled... And walked in the shooting scene ? Ok... Now what atena or satelite would that be connected on. ? She has a phone but it needs a relay ? She went back in time and the sattelite also ? She placed antenas on rooftops ? Lool. And its not a man in black its a woman see the skirt and the stokings.
Remeber when the bluthooth came out... We where saying who is he / she talking too ? Is she crazy or what ? imagine in 1920.
@simhon007 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@simhon007 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
she looks far to authenticly dressed to be from the future everthing looks about rigtht apart from the fact shes got her hand upto her face as if holding a phone,she is just covering her face for some reason
@charlie1eye it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@Smisser991 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
She's screwing with her hat pin at the last second because her hat slips, and she knows she has screwed up the shot at this point and is kind of mumbling to herself as she turns to the director (perhaps likely Chaplain himself) sitting behind the camera who is saying 'Good job, ethyl, you sure fuckered up this scene...... cut cut cut CUT'
There is a reason the scene never made it to the movie, her fuck up was it.
@333maxwell it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
My mistake: Upon second viewing, I realise it is not an old lady, but simply a matron, someone who saw her best years take place in the 1910's. And I still don't see her smiling anywhere in this footage.
Not surprisingly: She's encased in a corset, yards of heavy wool, and bothered by a pesky earring and intrusive cameramen!
@homargc it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
An old lady, heavyset, not butch, nor a man in drag (unnecessarily unkind to fancy that), walks past a camera in 1928, holding in one hand a large purse and/or packages, and in the other her black gloves... And with that somewhat free hand, she starts to screw one of her screwable earrings, typical of the era, without much success; which likely makes her speak out mild imprecations... And you all think she's gabbing on a mobile? Really?
@homargc it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
A cell phone will not work without cell phone towers, or a satellite to transmit signals. It would be equivilant to you taking your cell phone in the middle of know where and expecting that you would be able to make a call...
@sxdirtbikedudemx it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@tomken8dy it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@lofasztaseggedbe it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@rusoope it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
she could of been mentally ill and she could of been talking to summet like a hankie or maybe she was just fieling her ear because its quite lumpy at the back of it,
for all we know that back thing could of been a shadow.
@RyannandLukee it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
first of all: its interesting to think about what the explanation for it could be,but apart from the fact that time travelling is not possible physically the biggest problem about a lady using her cellphone in 1928 is another thing:
how can she use it without any satellites in the sky transferring her call to another cellphone? in 1928 there oft course were no MOBILE PHONE NETWORKS at all.
@vakurio it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
i think you have to much free time!!! yes it does look like a mobile phone but seriously dude next you`ll be telling me there`s a dalek in the end credits????
@jipbhoy it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
George Clarke is slightly deluded here. The woman/man in the frame is obviously fiddling with a hair pin or something as two of the fingers go under the hat. Obviously, George Clarke can't see very well but he's seeing things that aren't there.
@anddyx it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@veeru0709 And how do you know it's right. are you an expert in 1920s filmography all of a sudden. Fact: it was no handkerchief. You wouldn't use a handkerchief by putting two fingers under hat - and that's the most accurate and it's right.
i find no explantion eighter, but i wonder weather a cell phone would have worked back in those days, i guess there was only analog phone-net available.
i find no explantion eighter, but i wonder weather a cell phone would have worked back in those days, i guess there was only analog phone-net available
@ransepanse it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
Siemens patent for a compact, pocket sized carbon microphone/amplifier device suitable for pocket instruments. you put this device to your ear but the whole device is in your pocket or in your jacket. check out siemens site about 1924's milestones.
@lofasztaseggedbe it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@lofasztaseggedbe it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
i think its an extra added on re edited ,ive been an extra and done silly things like that, in dr who walk behind a rock with a hat on and appere again with another hat, to see if it getsnoticed.
@ibizasungod it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@hoytzone just so you know, the woman is there because the charlie chaplin videos was NOT taken in 1928.You cannot time travel, it's fantasy.And the claim that charlie chaplin videos were taken in 1928, is laughable because it's a movie, not a documentary video, so it could have been filmed later than 1930.
@hoytzone it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
@myhood25 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
It could be recorder or a recorder on the cell phone when she/he havd travel back in the time and havd make a commentry then she/he maybe drop it and it broke.
What the fuck are you doing stealing other peoples videos delete this now.
NintendexF8000 22 hours ago
She isnt talking to anyone. There is no towers. She is just talking to Siri and because there is some noise she holds the cellphone to her ear. Simple. >_>
TheCyber3000 1 week ago
If it is a early version of an hearing aid the hearing aids in 1920's are huge and at 3:31 you can see a white two squared object in her hand O_O my phone is also white and no one is around her when shes talking WTF????!!!!!!!
Mephilesthedark1360 1 month ago
I don't see any physical device in her hand. I see just her holding her hand to her head in an excited self ranting type of manner. Sort of how people hold their hands over their mouth or around other parts of their head. Just a way of expressing themselves. Time travel can't exist because of the grandfather paradox.
antwoneeter 2 months ago
Kinda looked like she ws scratching her head and talking to herself. I don't imagine that when we invent time travel devices, we will send a cross dressing lunatic to the past.
burnrider2001 3 months ago
Circus?
Pet bird or animal?
ISENTRY 3 months ago
So, if you were a time traveler wouldn't talking on a cell phone blow your cover a bit? Also, wouldn't you need to bring a cell phone tower with you as well? Also, why doesn't anyone show any particular interest in this person's cavalier use of technology from the future?
InThisStyle 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
she's hiding her face from the camera retard, in 1928 cameras were the size of a mack truck and pretty hard to hide from the public when you film them.
mynamesrickjames 3 months ago
Comment removed
mynamesrickjames 3 months ago
Comment removed
mynamesrickjames 3 months ago
Here's my answer...post this in the Search box:
DavidRaySkinner 1928 Time Traveler
DavidRaySkinner 5 months ago
yea but who she talking to?
ARJI1979 6 months ago
maybe the phone is linked with the present? did you ever think about that? look into project stargate!
Maximus3087 6 months ago
you can clearly see that its a man with a object cuffed around his ear. if you look closely her face actually has a male face. but yeah thats deff a phone
Maximus3087 6 months ago
if it were a cell phone, who would she be talking to in the past...being the only one with one. this is a bust
K1dDread 6 months ago
William Shockley,John Bardeen,Walter Houser Brattain of Bell Lab.Can you hear me now! in 1927.AM ,Amplitude modulation.In the mid-1870s, a form of amplitude modulation—initially called "undulatory currents"—was the first method to successfully produce quality audio over telephone lines. Beginning with Reginald Fessenden's audio demonstrations in 1906
kinbigbird 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you like time travel movies seek THRILL SEEKERS with Casper Van Dien , Catherine Bell and Martin Sheen. year 1999
kinbigbird 6 months ago
Comment removed
kinbigbird 6 months ago
A transistor radio is a small portable radio receiver using transistor-based circuitry. ... Bell Laboratories demonstrated the first transistor on December 23, 1947
kinbigbird 6 months ago
That's is weird. Good catch. My thought? If that is a communications device? Then time travel may be involved? Or it may be a cross dresser that is talking to himself? :) Thumbs up to you.
NWOrDREGS 6 months ago
@NWOrDREGS you can see a device in his hand
Maximus3087 6 months ago
@Maximus3087 I'm not doubting the video or you. Just strange to see someone, at that moment in time, talking into something in their hand.
I could download this and sharpen it up. Then enlarge it. I'm not going to. Too many other strange things going on. I need to attend to. (Just click my username.) :)
Peace! And keep on showing the truth.
NWOrDREGS 6 months ago
another thing theres no satellites for the fone to connect to
tab6812 7 months ago
toothache. ice pack. pain. common slicker.
Stop it.
committeesq 7 months ago
OK - WHO is she talking to? There were no cell phone towers, even in LA, in the 1920's. It looks like an early hearing aid to me. Even if it was a time traveler, they would have no one else to talk to since there is NO CELL SYSTEM.
Nice try though. It does look weird at first.
davidpersons2011 8 months ago
Why do people think a communication device from the future would work anything like a present day cell phone ?
Nuclear powered and able to broadcast perfectly across space and/or time sounds more like something a time traveler would have.
5150jafo 8 months ago
If is a hearing aid who is she talking to..
hoytzone 10 months ago 4
@hoytzone Hearing aids help aid hearing, she might be adjusting it.
voidlam 10 months ago
@hoytzone herself ;)
Gotenks7Kid 5 months ago
I'´m sorry for those that don't believe it but, she's trully holding something, it's clear it's one of those mobiles we open, close - longer, you can see the other part in the end of her hand -, she's truly talking to somebody, because from the start she's talking, smiling. I don't believe in time travel, all this BS, but I guess Chaplin made another good joke of his... he probably read the prophecies about the future and decided to let this image for us... LOL LOL what a genius!
laurids2007 1 year ago
@laurids2007 Its a Kind of a radio...
anncolico031 11 months ago
well after seeing that all i can think is this man/woman has fucked our timeline up, aka the butterfly affect, MABEY thats why we have such a high fucking tax rate, or wars that could of been provented.
catlow2002 1 year ago
she scrached her head
RubixTV 1 year ago
i can tell you! these guy is doing a JOKE, like talkin in his hand like a super detective from the future, he s on a FILMSET, dont forget that! some folkes was in a mute of Sci-Fi and the beginning High Tech, this Guy is JOKING!!! Hes talkin to his Hand in a kind of a futuristic vision, THATS IT! I would do also! because its FUN!
spidermarcus 1 year ago
But this is 1928 -no sonotone until 1929 and that box is big-google it--Debunked
hoytzone 1 year ago
When you step back in time-are you really in the same clothes when you left?you might be put into the clothes of the time and not even know?
hoytzone 1 year ago
Oh my god!!! She is using iPhone 5 lol
Kurdiyar 1 year ago 2
In theory, time travel is considered a real possibility in science. The problem is as of 2010, we're not aware of anyone having created technology which would allow the opportunity to do this. However, let's say that someone in the year 2025 did develop the means and came back to today. This would mean that the present is actually the past, and the future is really the present. Which means, everything that you do as of this moment has already happened as you're simply catching up to that.
unseensecret 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
present time time which is in the futures past. You could go further in arguing that there's multiple dimensions, as there is the past-past, past-present, past-future, past-present, present, present-future the futures-future etc etc. Perhaps this is why so many of us experience deja vu or premonitions. Think about it, how many of you have known you were going to cut yourself before you cut yourself. Or thought about someone that you haven't seen in a long time...
unseensecret 1 year ago
Comment removed
unseensecret 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
prent time time which is in the futures past. You could go further in arguing that there's multiple dimensions, as there is the past-past, past-present, past-future, past-present, present, present-future the futures-future etc etc. Perhaps this is why so many of us experience deja vu or premonitions. Think about it, how many of you have known you were going to cut yourself before you cut yourself. Or thought about someone that you haven't seen in a long time...
unseensecret 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and that you just happen to bump into them. Anything is possible including this time travelling women when you consider the idea of quantum mechanics
unseensecret 1 year ago
IPHONE 4 NEW GEN
TheFlygentlemen 1 year ago
@areljl01 The first radio receiver/transmitter to be nick-named "Walkie-Talkie" was the backpacked Motorola SCR-300, created by an engineering team in 1940 at the Galvin Manufacturing Company (fore-runner of Motorola)
hoytzone 1 year ago
search: iphone time traveler. proof iphone used in 1940's 8mm home movie.
tubengagements 1 year ago
dats bizare bt we eva wa eh is :D :D.
sarah3688o 1 year ago
if this true then how the hell did she get service? haha
MzRiZzA 1 year ago
Its a Sonotone hearing aid, brand new in 1928, the latest gadget for the hard of hearing, it was marketed to wealthy old women and men. It looks like a mobile phone, but it isn't and as for why the woman was talking, she only began speaking just before she stopped walking and looked at the camera, it was quite obvious she was speaking to the cameraman/director in a "have I done it right?" way.
Heres an image of the Sonotone on google images.
WiganParanormal 1 year ago 2
@WiganParanormal Well if she was a mental case and was talking to someone
that was not near her on her hearing aid --then thats explains it all--remember
she could not even find shoes that fit her.but did you need to hold your hand with
knuckles bent it that fashion like we do now on a old hearing aid and talking in 1928
hoytzone 1 year ago
@WiganParanormal Sonotone was established and incorporated in 1929 by Hugo Leiber as an ...
Google it and the first looks like a box radio
hoytzone 1 year ago
@Jaydi25 Haha!!!I hear you!
2blakandbold 1 year ago
as Stephen Hawking said, if people could time travel, they'd be here now....telling us they were from the future. I think this is just something which "looks" like someone using a phone but there could be many explanations.
Sirona1975 1 year ago
@2blakandbold You aren't making any sense and completely off topic. Get your thoughts together and try again when you have something meaningful to contribute to this video.
zer0dahero 1 year ago
@zer0dahero Seek Medical Attention for your Disorder!
2blakandbold 1 year ago
@2blakandbold you mean my unfortutane ability to be a rational thinking human being and not one to fall for silly and illogical conjectures as you do? Perhaps it may be a handicap in crazy land but I don't live in your crazy land.
zer0dahero 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zer0dahero Get a Life & Stop Stalking me!
2blakandbold 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zer0dahero Get a Life and Stop Stalking me
2blakandbold 1 year ago
@zer0dahero such as a very fast spaceship, one person is able to experience several days while another person simultaneously experiences only a few hours or minutes. The same two people can meet up again, one having experienced days or even years while the other has only experienced minutes. The person in the spaceship only needs to travel near to the speed of light. The faster they travel, the slower their time will pass relative to someone planted firmly on the Earth
hoytzone 1 year ago
@hoytzone Thats the old grand father paradox (over 100 years old by now). Is there a point or a question in there somewhere.
zer0dahero 1 year ago
Its solved.. Its a hearing aid !!! They had them back them and they look just like that.
HOTGRID 1 year ago
@HOTGRID Aww damn seriously!?
Evangeline30575 1 year ago
two camels in a tiny car. that is my explanation for this video.
seanismaboii 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wat a load of bollox wats all the fuss about. could be jus some crazy woman talkin to herself or to a piece of plastic. thanks for wastin 10 mins of my life u cunt.
chuckfest1 1 year ago
Comment removed
chuckfest1 1 year ago
Comment removed
chuckfest1 1 year ago
Siemens patent for a compact, pocket sized carbon microphone/amplifier device suitable for pocket instruments.
carbon amplifier patented by Siemens
YellowSSS 1 year ago
i meant to say y go to 1928?
zeno711 1 year ago
if u can time travel how much longer?
zeno711 1 year ago
What the heck is all the fuss about cell towers for? If you have the technology to time travel don't ya think they could come up with a communication device that can talk back to the future without cell towers?
Someone else tried to explain it as a woman scratching her head. I guess, that guy thought she was scratching and talking to her lice.
To me, she looks like a he. His shoes are as big or bigger than the man's shoes that is walking in front of her/him.
slugo4449 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mith revealed in my channel
thedabick 1 year ago
Has that one been digitally remastered? anything added or removed for effect? I wuld try to view the origional film to see it that is in there. It is also possible that the director may have just been kind of creative. Think of Jules Verne and how some of the ideas n his books were unthinkable at the time such as traveling to the moon, or circumnavigating the globe via air travel. Also, and to a lesser extent, think Ray Bradbury's book "Ferinheit 451";
mrjshear 1 year ago
ESTA ESCENA NO EXISTE EN LA PELICULA THE CIRCUS, ES UN INVENTO, Y SI COMPARAN ESTA ESCENA CON LA PELICULA VERDADERA SE VAN A DAR CUENTA DE L A DIFERENCIA EN LA TONALIDAD DE LOS GRISES. DENTRO DE TODO ES UNA BUENA IMITACION DE LOS FILMES DE ESA EPOCA.
lapalandita 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
seems strange that some are saying it's an hearing aid. because the lady would seem be using her hearing aid the wrong way as she has the mircrophone to her ear. she should have had an ear plug. check this site hearingaidmuseum com
pazebo 1 year ago
she has big feet!
AndyLuckyShot 1 year ago
it's also possible that she is simply speaking to herself and trying to remember her cue...
or, you could go with the Mythbusters mentality...
"When you can't prove something happened, it must be a hoax."
99mees 1 year ago
TIME TRAVELLER FROM THE FUTURE!!
mommyman1234 1 year ago 10
@mommyman1234 Hell yeah its a time traveler you dumbass mommas boy
KaronsDarkness 1 year ago
hearing aid :|
hessam6662006 1 year ago
1) Who would she call?
2) How would she find a signal before they invented the towers?
Tamakath 1 year ago
@Tamakath dude i think they wouldnt need towers no more after they discover time travel , theyd have a little thing in the phone , or a speical one jst for time travel that requires no tower
Jor3372 1 year ago
@Jor3372 with that technology they would have earplugs and a microphone embedded in their teeth, no need for a cell phone.
Tamakath 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3:21 guy in front of time traveler is packing heat!
Check out my response video!
tjamesgillis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3:21 guy in front of time traveler is packing heat! Check out my response video!
tjamesgillis 1 year ago
what a jackass
mycaddigo 1 year ago
Comment removed
boyhey1 1 year ago
maybe it's posible and she is a time travel ,BUT how can she use that device in 1928 ?
i mean in 1928 no mobile or device like that so it's means there is no network for mobile ! so if she is time travel and she bring that phone from future it's ok but she cant use it in 1928 BECUASE NO NETROWK FOR MOBILE
roham1233 1 year ago
@roham1233 dont they have house phones? (no sarcasm just asking)
mynamefails96 1 year ago
@roham1233 what if, on her "present" (time where she traveled from) time, signals are so strong that it travels through time, which if true means there are tons of people who time travels, and if so, then this indicates that this old lady is pretty dumb cuz she just tampered with time paradox O.O
MaxBlight 1 year ago
@MaxBlight remember if you are time tavelingv, the place yo left are still sending signals
hoytzone 1 year ago
"Damn Doc I told you the Delorean was out of Gas!"
bloodawn5 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can you hear me now? Good!
Luke252627 1 year ago
Forget the woman! Can't anyone see that the guy walking ahead of her has a phaser in his pants pocket?
lvblvb 1 year ago
Stop dropping acid dude!
peppersax 1 year ago
It's not a phone and in no frame can you see a "thin, black device". At the end of the clip you can clearly see the womans hands begin to clench and it looks more like she's scratching her head. There are dozens of possible reasons for this footage and the last conclusion I'd jump to is time travel. Blatant trolling.
dhenniga 1 year ago
4:36 "It's not an AM/FM radio, because obviously, it's 1928"
Yeah, it has to be a phone
johnthefisherman66 1 year ago
I think I have an actual explanation. The box set was remastered and released in september 2003 there were cell phones then. I believe that whoever remastered the movies threw that in to cause this exact reaction from people. Have you ever watched the reel to reel it was originally filmed and shown with. I will bet you won't see a woman on a cell phone in the original release of it.
jeslyncar 1 year ago
Its Ray William Johnson's great grandmother just calling to say i love you...
kaneek26 1 year ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
This comment has been removed by the time traveler
frequenceez 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is what i came out with for Charlie Chaplin's 1928 misterious device seen in 'The Circus' behind the scene sequence.
western electric audiphone model 34A - hearing aid created in 1925.
Mabe she/he was testing the device or just being a dumbass like i still see in 2010 lol ;)
see the device here : youtube.com/watch?v=n8htFdolXmo
electra4554 1 year ago
If time travel was possible, someone in the future would come back to tell us. :)
DelornificatioN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A heavy matron is filmed in 1928 holding in one hand a large purse and packages, and in the other her black gloves, whilst trying to screw one of her screwable earrings, typical of the era, without much success; which likely makes her speak out-loud mild imprecations... And you all think she's gabbing away on a mobile? Really? Encase yourselves in a corset, yards of heavy wool, and get bothered by a pesky earring and intrusive cameramen, to see if you wouldn't have a meltdown too!
homargc 1 year ago
I think this is not about time traveling. I think the film was taking around 1950. The film is too clear to be from 1928. And the man (lady) is talking on a walkie talkie. I think the studio added the footage to sale the video, and stated that the extra footage was a part of the 1928 circus, but actually was taken much later. The device that he/she is talking on seems larger from a particular angle and look like a walkie talkie from the 1950's.
Mymoonlightray 1 year ago
she's saying shit there's a guy with an hd camcorder fiming me and u told me i was the first time traveller u lying twat.
fletch762 1 year ago
We all know shes just listening to her Ipod .__.
19martin99 1 year ago
@19martin99 joijoojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojojoj
caspercorp 1 year ago
myhood it still don't explian y she has a mobile fone. maybe this is faked, or its not a cell fone at all and novarberor u dick!
Cripps01 1 year ago
just holding her hand up
TheGrizzlysquirrel 1 year ago
Maybe she was trying to receive direction from someone on her right and couldn't hear because of noise from the set on her left, thus she's covering that one ear.
I don't know, it is weird though.
TheJommamomma 1 year ago
its a 11G PDT4 IPHONE series (PDT4 means 4th generation of PARALLEL DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGY ) while 11G gives you access to internet and phone calls to future and the past via a high end micro universe chip, also you got a bonus feature called miniGOD that grands you 3 wishes even if one of them is for more wishes,
Novarberor 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ChewingWood it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
We need to stop saying she's a time travler because everytime we make a mention of it we''re altering events.
England22015 1 year ago 3
@England22015 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
It is not possible but, when you reach the technology that allows you to travel in the time, you will probably using some other tech rather than normal cell phone.
huseyinkara028 1 year ago
@huseyinkara028 unless time travel has been discovered!
XTR3ME07 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XTR3ME07 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@huseyinkara028 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
ha ha ha ha ha a cebra seat mounted?? jajajajaja yeeeehaaa africaaa :)
starrt789 1 year ago
So wait let me get this one straight... She time triveled... And walked in the shooting scene ? Ok... Now what atena or satelite would that be connected on. ? She has a phone but it needs a relay ? She went back in time and the sattelite also ? She placed antenas on rooftops ? Lool. And its not a man in black its a woman see the skirt and the stokings.
Remeber when the bluthooth came out... We where saying who is he / she talking too ? Is she crazy or what ? imagine in 1920.
simhon007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@simhon007 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
So wait let me get this one straight... She time triveled... And walked in the shooting scene ?
simhon007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@simhon007 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
she looks far to authenticly dressed to be from the future everthing looks about rigtht apart from the fact shes got her hand upto her face as if holding a phone,she is just covering her face for some reason
charlie1eye 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@charlie1eye it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
its a Waky Taky !
Smisser991 1 year ago
@Smisser991 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One more analysis of the footage.
Watch closely:
watch?v=IUKNK_XfswY
milansc 1 year ago
She's screwing with her hat pin at the last second because her hat slips, and she knows she has screwed up the shot at this point and is kind of mumbling to herself as she turns to the director (perhaps likely Chaplain himself) sitting behind the camera who is saying 'Good job, ethyl, you sure fuckered up this scene...... cut cut cut CUT'
There is a reason the scene never made it to the movie, her fuck up was it.
---
I know because I went back in time to find out.
333maxwell 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@333maxwell it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
My mistake: Upon second viewing, I realise it is not an old lady, but simply a matron, someone who saw her best years take place in the 1910's. And I still don't see her smiling anywhere in this footage.
Not surprisingly: She's encased in a corset, yards of heavy wool, and bothered by a pesky earring and intrusive cameramen!
homargc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@homargc it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
An old lady, heavyset, not butch, nor a man in drag (unnecessarily unkind to fancy that), walks past a camera in 1928, holding in one hand a large purse and/or packages, and in the other her black gloves... And with that somewhat free hand, she starts to screw one of her screwable earrings, typical of the era, without much success; which likely makes her speak out mild imprecations... And you all think she's gabbing on a mobile? Really?
homargc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@homargc it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
A cell phone will not work without cell phone towers, or a satellite to transmit signals. It would be equivilant to you taking your cell phone in the middle of know where and expecting that you would be able to make a call...
sxdirtbikedudemx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sxdirtbikedudemx it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
There were no cell towers in 1928. lol
tomken8dy 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tomken8dy it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
it was shot after the movie
lofasztaseggedbe 1 year ago
@lofasztaseggedbe it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
EPIC FAIL
rusoope 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rusoope it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
she could of been mentally ill and she could of been talking to summet like a hankie or maybe she was just fieling her ear because its quite lumpy at the back of it,
for all we know that back thing could of been a shadow.
RyannandLukee 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RyannandLukee it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
first of all: its interesting to think about what the explanation for it could be,but apart from the fact that time travelling is not possible physically the biggest problem about a lady using her cellphone in 1928 is another thing:
how can she use it without any satellites in the sky transferring her call to another cellphone? in 1928 there oft course were no MOBILE PHONE NETWORKS at all.
vakurio 1 year ago
Comment removed
vakurio 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vakurio it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
i think you have to much free time!!! yes it does look like a mobile phone but seriously dude next you`ll be telling me there`s a dalek in the end credits????
jipbhoy 1 year ago
@jipbhoy it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
George Clarke is slightly deluded here. The woman/man in the frame is obviously fiddling with a hair pin or something as two of the fingers go under the hat. Obviously, George Clarke can't see very well but he's seeing things that aren't there.
anddyx 1 year ago
@anddyx it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
@veeru0709 And how do you know it's right. are you an expert in 1920s filmography all of a sudden. Fact: it was no handkerchief. You wouldn't use a handkerchief by putting two fingers under hat - and that's the most accurate and it's right.
anddyx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i find no explantion eighter, but i wonder weather a cell phone would have worked back in those days, i guess there was only analog phone-net available.
ransepanse 1 year ago
i find no explantion eighter, but i wonder weather a cell phone would have worked back in those days, i guess there was only analog phone-net available
ransepanse 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ransepanse it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
1924.
Siemens patent for a compact, pocket sized carbon microphone/amplifier device suitable for pocket instruments. you put this device to your ear but the whole device is in your pocket or in your jacket. check out siemens site about 1924's milestones.
lofasztaseggedbe 1 year ago
@lofasztaseggedbe maybe its not a phone i dont know. but its 100% that this woman was crazy:D
lofasztaseggedbe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lofasztaseggedbe it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lofasztaseggedbe it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
i think its an extra added on re edited ,ive been an extra and done silly things like that, in dr who walk behind a rock with a hat on and appere again with another hat, to see if it getsnoticed.
ibizasungod 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ibizasungod it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
@hoytzone just so you know, the woman is there because the charlie chaplin videos was NOT taken in 1928.You cannot time travel, it's fantasy.And the claim that charlie chaplin videos were taken in 1928, is laughable because it's a movie, not a documentary video, so it could have been filmed later than 1930.
myhood25 1 year ago
@myhood25 rent the vid and see for yourself i know they did that back then
hoytzone 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hoytzone it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@myhood25 it was a hand kerchief she was holding and talking to the person ahead of her and this u can clearly see when she stops she folds her fingers at the end of the video and it is clear that there is no machine or device in her hand ,it was just a hand kerchief or a coloured cloth. when the cameraman wishes her she wishes him back saying HI or Hello Loudly ,she is not talking in phone,.
this is the most accurate answer and its right.
veeru0709 1 year ago
@myhood25 "The circus" premiered in 1928. The footage is not from the actual film and is probably news footage of the premier.
England22015 1 year ago
It could be recorder or a recorder on the cell phone when she/he havd travel back in the time and havd make a commentry then she/he maybe drop it and it broke.
prixthkson 1 year ago