doesn't matter how young you are you can do this if you can add,subtract, divide and multiply, and watch the play list. long live you-tube...and this guy that does this.
wait if the average of each X(sub)i equals Mu, then how did you cancel it out with the denominator N? shouldn't it still remain 2x Mu squared divided by N?
I've got a question... If I have the size of the population, but I just need the variance of a sample, e.g: (N=60, n=10), then I should use n-1? thnx!:)
I have to take statistics this upcoming semester. I know nothing about it since I've never taken anything related to it and watching this video scared me to death...haha...wow...I really hope it's not as hard as it looks. I have a feeling I'll be coming back to your videos soon.
AMAZINGGGGGGGGGG THANKS!! YOUR THE BEST~~~! ... your teaching a student who had no idea of what math was ! NOW i totally get it! this will help because im taking a stats course in two years. .. Question- is this all the possible work i would see in statistical math?
I always understand what Sal is doing (and I watched around 40 ones, yet) but at 4:20 I don't get it. Please help me here, where is the sum of 1 in the numerator come from? It looks like conjuring up an N for cancelling out with the N in the denominator...
mu squared times the sum of ones in the numerator comes from the fact that you add mu squared N times, which is simply Nmu**2. After you square the original variance numerator you need to sum each of the three terms from 1 to N. Hope this helps.
what he is doing is summing up 1, N times (1+1+1+....N) and then multiplying by mew squared. An alternative could be just summing mew N times (which would have been easier to understand). What this would look like is replace 1 with mew sqared. (and there would no longer be a need to multiply by mew squared).
This is beacause the sigma applied to everything inside the brackets, including the constant u. (u is a constant because there is no x-sub-i to contribute to the sum).
@dasboot356 lots of times the proprieties of a sum are the same as the integrals.the 2nd term has a variable so you put the sum of Xub i times the constant 2*mew .the 3rd term has only the one because its all a constant, it has no variable!
@yynotx I still don't understand why the third sigma term is multiplied times 1. Why would that cause the moo to become it's coefficient? And if you're multiplying it by 1, why even put the 1 there?
The standard formula requires that all of the samples be involved in each new calculation. This is a very inefficient use of computational power and memory, but with above formula, running tally is kept while moving through the signal. This is good for microprocessor or FPGA in DSP design.
Comment removed
020536 1 month ago in playlist Statistics
noone else can teach like you . You are a great teacher. keep it up. It's really suprising to see three dislikes for this video.
haappyone 1 month ago in playlist Statistics
big boy mathematics.
(i think a kid in primary school can do this if they watched these videos.)
THE16THPHANTOM 3 months ago in playlist Statistics
thank you!!!!!!!
MrBonesigh 3 months ago in playlist Statistics
I think I would like to marry you.
lizlizlizliz7 5 months ago
you helped us thanks alot,by sakariye aadan
silsilac 6 months ago
good
silsilac 6 months ago
dddddd
silsilac 6 months ago
I dont understand cuz im only 11
SuperRockstar206 8 months ago
@SuperRockstar206
doesn't matter how young you are you can do this if you can add,subtract, divide and multiply, and watch the play list. long live you-tube...and this guy that does this.
THE16THPHANTOM 3 months ago in playlist Statistics
wait if the average of each X(sub)i equals Mu, then how did you cancel it out with the denominator N? shouldn't it still remain 2x Mu squared divided by N?
dshnig 1 year ago
oh thank you so much!!!!!!seriously i have a stats final in 7 hours and you helped me out so much thank you!!!you make it so easy!
chrisisretardedxD 1 year ago
I've got a question... If I have the size of the population, but I just need the variance of a sample, e.g: (N=60, n=10), then I should use n-1? thnx!:)
MrNicorodriguezD 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be a part of Russian ladies community gettop5.info
makaylafrke 1 year ago
Thanx, I like your way of teaching
rebel7332 1 year ago
i hate numbers
MissDJ 1 year ago
thanks Sal!
durumsemolina 1 year ago
can you do a video for standard deviation for group data thanks
renj3000 1 year ago
Shouldn't also been ... -2*u divided by N + u ..., because it is the whole formula divided by N?
Hoping an answer
Enviousful 1 year ago
I have to take statistics this upcoming semester. I know nothing about it since I've never taken anything related to it and watching this video scared me to death...haha...wow...I really hope it's not as hard as it looks. I have a feeling I'll be coming back to your videos soon.
xAliceDollyMisfitToy 1 year ago
@xAliceDollyMisfitToy i have to take statistica in an upcoming semester i have feeling i will too
crispy82185 1 year ago
AMAZINGGGGGGGGGG THANKS!! YOUR THE BEST~~~! ... your teaching a student who had no idea of what math was ! NOW i totally get it! this will help because im taking a stats course in two years. .. Question- is this all the possible work i would see in statistical math?
DiamondApple100 1 year ago
i failed on statistics -.-" lol
deadboy000 1 year ago
This guy is awesome! I have been looking for how to work this formulation out!
antikorean 1 year ago
i love you. ohmygod
hsktoadftw 1 year ago
This is very helpfull, I watched all the statistics videos and love the topic now
Thank you so much, you have no idea how much you have helped me
Ihatenicknames1 1 year ago
if you wanna know how many videos youtube has or many other facts about youtube click on my channel
3runrob 1 year ago
i still get a small thrill from an unanticipated cancellation--living large!
yynotx 2 years ago 8
watched on Jan 04,
Thanks
aozcakir2 2 years ago
I always understand what Sal is doing (and I watched around 40 ones, yet) but at 4:20 I don't get it. Please help me here, where is the sum of 1 in the numerator come from? It looks like conjuring up an N for cancelling out with the N in the denominator...
Thanx for helping me.
dasboot356 2 years ago
mu squared times the sum of ones in the numerator comes from the fact that you add mu squared N times, which is simply Nmu**2. After you square the original variance numerator you need to sum each of the three terms from 1 to N. Hope this helps.
konopong 2 years ago
what he is doing is summing up 1, N times (1+1+1+....N) and then multiplying by mew squared. An alternative could be just summing mew N times (which would have been easier to understand). What this would look like is replace 1 with mew sqared. (and there would no longer be a need to multiply by mew squared).
BurningBright4ever 2 years ago
This is beacause the sigma applied to everything inside the brackets, including the constant u. (u is a constant because there is no x-sub-i to contribute to the sum).
backstudy27 2 years ago
@dasboot356 lots of times the proprieties of a sum are the same as the integrals.the 2nd term has a variable so you put the sum of Xub i times the constant 2*mew .the 3rd term has only the one because its all a constant, it has no variable!
crlfdpta 2 years ago
I you are rerferring to the 3rd sigma term at 4:28--
the 1 is from moving the moo (or "u") to be a
coefficient fo the sigma expression
yynotx 2 years ago
@yynotx I still don't understand why the third sigma term is multiplied times 1. Why would that cause the moo to become it's coefficient? And if you're multiplying it by 1, why even put the 1 there?
ninjajesus81 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What is the point of doing this? I was confused enough with the standard formula.
InMooseWeTrust 2 years ago
Comment removed
shazaduh 2 years ago
Comment removed
shazaduh 2 years ago
The standard formula requires that all of the samples be involved in each new calculation. This is a very inefficient use of computational power and memory, but with above formula, running tally is kept while moving through the signal. This is good for microprocessor or FPGA in DSP design.
shazaduh 2 years ago
I highly reccommend this guys videos, he's VERY good at explaining things simply, which is not easy when stats is concerned :-D
orpheus1664 3 years ago 23
Comment removed
020536 1 month ago in playlist Statistics
That's really interesting...
Thank you.
Shazaaming 3 years ago 2