Jesus was against these same Jews and Romans, who as a technique in their con game use the Bible and Torah and Talmud to terrorize everyone, whilst engaging in the most heinous of crimes behind a glossy sheen of God and love.
The university of Freemasonic Phoenix seems to pop up everywhere too.
@Rev1vedR0manEmp1re I have just finished reading a book , Man ,Greed and the Economy I don't know what to think about my being sooo stupid that I didn't see these things coming
Look Max, the guys who set this up, got their investments out of these banks before they failed... they set it up that way. They are families who you'd never hear on any Forbes top ten list, they are beyond the little people that that mag covers. You are still arguing for the perpetrators to win! These banks are all thats left, you let them fail, and every good asset in America would be gone over night for a fraction of their worth. The people who do the clean up on these corps failing win big!
Seriously, if you don't have a set of eyes in there, then they'll do it again and again. It's a hell of a lot better than just letting the whole thing fall apart. Obama knows a banking system run by the government would never work, he doesn't want to be a socialist... that's why he didn't let the banks fail, he didn't want the government to run anything! He knows, well enough, that would be a disaster! He wants to leave it to the right people, but keep those people in check!
Look man, I know it's hard to face, but Obama's a political animal like all the rest. Only he's more dangerous because he's got the press in his pocket and a legion of misguided starry eyed followers. You're using a lot of convoluted logic to defend the government.. It's simple. Let the banks fail. They are not too big to fail. The bailout will ulimately lead to a longer and deeper depression. It's unconstitutional and has set a dangerous precedent for big brother style government.
And what did you want him to do, let all these banks fail, so the world banks can gobble everything up for dimes on the dollar, like the last couple of crashes? He's trying to stave off the big banks, not save them. Saving all these little banks mean keeping the wealth of your country in the hands of people who live in your country. That's what went down the last crash, all the central banks made it happen then, too. Obama's trying to stop them from owning it all for the price of deception.
"And what did you want him to do, let all these banks fail, so the world banks can gobble everything up for dimes on the dollar, like the last couple of crashes?"
You seem to be missing the point. These are the "world banks" that you are talking about! And thanks to Bush and Obama, they have pocketed trillions of dollars of the tax payers money. Not only that, but these rotten banks are using some of that money to buy up well run small banks. It's a whole new level of corruption.
I agree, but the banks have to buy up good assets, immediately, or the money you just handed over will be gone, with no, or very little return. The situation is crazy. The banks have protected themselves with so much legislation, the federal bank doesn't even have to do anything any administration wants them to do. They're untouchable, but the banks have a weakness, one: the existing laws protect the share holders, so they needed shares! They had to own a part of it to see what is going on!
Who the hell are you going to hire, they're not allowed into the Banks books, he hire people on the inside who know the banking system, inside and out. They came up with something, to help Obama figure out what the banks have been doing, are doing and going to do about what they just did! What, hire somone who knows nothing? The originals, he wanted to hire, the best legal thinkers in the USA, don't pay their taxes! lol... so, he had to go with the guys who fucked it up in the first place!
Boy that's a great plan. Let's hire the people who screwed it up to figure out how to save it. That's utterly absurd. I don't know why people need to hero worship. Obama is a politician. Nothing more. He's not some holy savior. He's continuing most of the ridiculous policies of George W. Bush and yet the people who hated Bush for this somehow think it's ok if Obama's doing it. What can one expect from a population that has been dumbed down by television.
What are YOU talking about? The Judge has been one of the most vocal opponents of the unconstitutional Patriot Act of anyone on the planet! Things are only getting worse now that George W. Obama is president.
What does that got to do with a totally rouge banking system, which has been practicing the most disgusting display of gluttony in the history of banking? You are crying about a 5% return on your taxpayers investment? You want these banks to be able to further squander whatever profits it makes on more bonuses? Obama needs to know what these people are doing to the US economy, it's ability to pay the interest on the money you people owe, to every bank in the fucking world, depends on it.
What the hell are you talking about? Most of Obama's cabinet is made up of Wall St. bankers. His Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was the former head of the N.Y. Federal Reserve, which is more responsible for this manufactured financial crisis than any other entity. Obama received the second highest amount of campaign contributions from AIG? He is completely bank owned. Central banks are the problem. I suggest you research the sordid histrory of the Federal Reserve.
Just who was doing the extorting, and for how long were they running silently (or not) amok? Hmmm ... let's see! Turbo tax cheat Tim Geithner served Reagan, Clinton and both Bushes for 13 years at Treasury Dept . In 2003 he went to New York Fed -- and now funnels taxpayer money to failed institutions under the Obama administration, but soon the shit will hit the fan! Of course that banker was afraid to come forward out of fear! And why? Because the job Geithner has now -- running the IRS!
1. Where in the Constitution does Tim Geithner (Chmn of NY Fed Reserve before role of Treasury Sec'y) have power or authority to extort bankers into taking TARP money, or determine how a bank are run, or refuse to let banks repay TARP funds?
2. Where in the Constitution does any US President, through his personnel, have the power or authority to fire any executive of any company, public or private?
Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke ... if this is even 1/8 true ... going bye-bye.
I'm not sure what we are going to look like in a couple of years. The nature of Government is to get as big as it can. I think once this tidal wave of change to our current system is over we might not recognize much of it. And once it does, I don't think we can go back
That's bullshit. The feds can't even run this country efficiently, now they want to take over banks. Are they going to take over my business too? I worked hard for my business and success, not the feds. Government workers are lazy, and will in no way put in the hours and have the passion that I have for the job.
If this happens, banks are going to be like the DMV and less like AAA.
I think the banks were in good shape up until the feds bullied them into lending more. Banks that had less regulations seem to be doing better than those who had more. Any private business will be more efficient than a government monopoly.
That's just not true. I think most local banks were in good shape, and the still are.
High risk companies like AIG, Citigroup, and capital one were NEVER in good shape. They are the finance version of Enron, cooking their books to generate bonuses.
The amount of lending that went out to high risk mortgages is a drop in a bucket! It's just a distraction, and a talking point, to make it look like the management of these companies was doing a good job.
you know I wonder what's going on because this vid is fine but the I watched other videos where the text and vid where like you said... upside down and backwards... maybe it's just April Fools from Youtube
Jesus was against these same Jews and Romans, who as a technique in their con game use the Bible and Torah and Talmud to terrorize everyone, whilst engaging in the most heinous of crimes behind a glossy sheen of God and love.
The university of Freemasonic Phoenix seems to pop up everywhere too.
Let me tell you Mr. Mason:
your a ungodly man doing these things
and your going to Hell
Rev1vedR0manEmp1re 1 year ago
@Rev1vedR0manEmp1re I have just finished reading a book , Man ,Greed and the Economy I don't know what to think about my being sooo stupid that I didn't see these things coming
jhunted7667 6 months ago
Look Max, the guys who set this up, got their investments out of these banks before they failed... they set it up that way. They are families who you'd never hear on any Forbes top ten list, they are beyond the little people that that mag covers. You are still arguing for the perpetrators to win! These banks are all thats left, you let them fail, and every good asset in America would be gone over night for a fraction of their worth. The people who do the clean up on these corps failing win big!
bragladish 2 years ago
Seriously, if you don't have a set of eyes in there, then they'll do it again and again. It's a hell of a lot better than just letting the whole thing fall apart. Obama knows a banking system run by the government would never work, he doesn't want to be a socialist... that's why he didn't let the banks fail, he didn't want the government to run anything! He knows, well enough, that would be a disaster! He wants to leave it to the right people, but keep those people in check!
bragladish 2 years ago
Look man, I know it's hard to face, but Obama's a political animal like all the rest. Only he's more dangerous because he's got the press in his pocket and a legion of misguided starry eyed followers. You're using a lot of convoluted logic to defend the government.. It's simple. Let the banks fail. They are not too big to fail. The bailout will ulimately lead to a longer and deeper depression. It's unconstitutional and has set a dangerous precedent for big brother style government.
MaxLibertas 2 years ago
And what did you want him to do, let all these banks fail, so the world banks can gobble everything up for dimes on the dollar, like the last couple of crashes? He's trying to stave off the big banks, not save them. Saving all these little banks mean keeping the wealth of your country in the hands of people who live in your country. That's what went down the last crash, all the central banks made it happen then, too. Obama's trying to stop them from owning it all for the price of deception.
bragladish 2 years ago
"And what did you want him to do, let all these banks fail, so the world banks can gobble everything up for dimes on the dollar, like the last couple of crashes?"
You seem to be missing the point. These are the "world banks" that you are talking about! And thanks to Bush and Obama, they have pocketed trillions of dollars of the tax payers money. Not only that, but these rotten banks are using some of that money to buy up well run small banks. It's a whole new level of corruption.
MaxLibertas 2 years ago
I agree, but the banks have to buy up good assets, immediately, or the money you just handed over will be gone, with no, or very little return. The situation is crazy. The banks have protected themselves with so much legislation, the federal bank doesn't even have to do anything any administration wants them to do. They're untouchable, but the banks have a weakness, one: the existing laws protect the share holders, so they needed shares! They had to own a part of it to see what is going on!
bragladish 2 years ago
Who the hell are you going to hire, they're not allowed into the Banks books, he hire people on the inside who know the banking system, inside and out. They came up with something, to help Obama figure out what the banks have been doing, are doing and going to do about what they just did! What, hire somone who knows nothing? The originals, he wanted to hire, the best legal thinkers in the USA, don't pay their taxes! lol... so, he had to go with the guys who fucked it up in the first place!
bragladish 2 years ago
Boy that's a great plan. Let's hire the people who screwed it up to figure out how to save it. That's utterly absurd. I don't know why people need to hero worship. Obama is a politician. Nothing more. He's not some holy savior. He's continuing most of the ridiculous policies of George W. Bush and yet the people who hated Bush for this somehow think it's ok if Obama's doing it. What can one expect from a population that has been dumbed down by television.
MaxLibertas 2 years ago
The Judge, I guess, hasn't read the Patriot Act. What rights? What liberties? What is this guy talking about?
bragladish 2 years ago
What are YOU talking about? The Judge has been one of the most vocal opponents of the unconstitutional Patriot Act of anyone on the planet! Things are only getting worse now that George W. Obama is president.
MaxLibertas 2 years ago
What does that got to do with a totally rouge banking system, which has been practicing the most disgusting display of gluttony in the history of banking? You are crying about a 5% return on your taxpayers investment? You want these banks to be able to further squander whatever profits it makes on more bonuses? Obama needs to know what these people are doing to the US economy, it's ability to pay the interest on the money you people owe, to every bank in the fucking world, depends on it.
bragladish 2 years ago
What the hell are you talking about? Most of Obama's cabinet is made up of Wall St. bankers. His Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner was the former head of the N.Y. Federal Reserve, which is more responsible for this manufactured financial crisis than any other entity. Obama received the second highest amount of campaign contributions from AIG? He is completely bank owned. Central banks are the problem. I suggest you research the sordid histrory of the Federal Reserve.
MaxLibertas 2 years ago
Comment removed
bragladish 2 years ago
Fixed elections, HUGE GOVT that interfers with our personal life, drugs, prosperity, money. when is it going to stop?
chollonerd 2 years ago
Just who was doing the extorting, and for how long were they running silently (or not) amok? Hmmm ... let's see! Turbo tax cheat Tim Geithner served Reagan, Clinton and both Bushes for 13 years at Treasury Dept . In 2003 he went to New York Fed -- and now funnels taxpayer money to failed institutions under the Obama administration, but soon the shit will hit the fan! Of course that banker was afraid to come forward out of fear! And why? Because the job Geithner has now -- running the IRS!
KarmicOmen 2 years ago
1. Where in the Constitution does Tim Geithner (Chmn of NY Fed Reserve before role of Treasury Sec'y) have power or authority to extort bankers into taking TARP money, or determine how a bank are run, or refuse to let banks repay TARP funds?
2. Where in the Constitution does any US President, through his personnel, have the power or authority to fire any executive of any company, public or private?
Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke ... if this is even 1/8 true ... going bye-bye.
KarmicOmen 2 years ago
thanks for posting this
jldrbjr 2 years ago
I'm not sure what we are going to look like in a couple of years. The nature of Government is to get as big as it can. I think once this tidal wave of change to our current system is over we might not recognize much of it. And once it does, I don't think we can go back
ydaani 2 years ago 2
You're right. It's called "tyranny," and there IS NO going back.
Lurking99 2 years ago
Where are all the investigative jounalistas that despise Bush so much? I'll bet you turn over this rock and it rolls right over to Obama too.
econogate 2 years ago 2
That's bullshit. The feds can't even run this country efficiently, now they want to take over banks. Are they going to take over my business too? I worked hard for my business and success, not the feds. Government workers are lazy, and will in no way put in the hours and have the passion that I have for the job.
If this happens, banks are going to be like the DMV and less like AAA.
quirose 2 years ago 5
I can't defend the extortion, but if you think banks have been run anymore efficiently than the government, then I think you're not paying attention.
johnedwards1968 2 years ago
I think the banks were in good shape up until the feds bullied them into lending more. Banks that had less regulations seem to be doing better than those who had more. Any private business will be more efficient than a government monopoly.
quirose 2 years ago
That's just not true. I think most local banks were in good shape, and the still are.
High risk companies like AIG, Citigroup, and capital one were NEVER in good shape. They are the finance version of Enron, cooking their books to generate bonuses.
The amount of lending that went out to high risk mortgages is a drop in a bucket! It's just a distraction, and a talking point, to make it look like the management of these companies was doing a good job.
johnedwards1968 2 years ago
why upsidedown backwards?
malerror 2 years ago 2
you know I wonder what's going on because this vid is fine but the I watched other videos where the text and vid where like you said... upside down and backwards... maybe it's just April Fools from Youtube
Wisewind 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no Judge, no ruling,
just Fox NEWS
valgehiir 2 years ago