Added: 1 year ago
From: belowthebeltway
Views: 99,237
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (528)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • A few ounces? That's not a little pot, that's a helluva lot! I could smoke that for 2 months!!

  • @VeritasLuxMea100 no way....I'd be rid of it in a week or 2.....especially with brownies!!

  • That's some true shit

  • wow pat robertson made some sense for once!!

  • This guy is still a fucking asshole

  • Oh c'mon, if pat had his way he'd execute cock smokers and pot smokers

  • I agree with pat roberson?

    *Head explodes

  • yay pat! you are listening to the Lord unlike so many others who tout the law of man over God's laws.

  • No matter what he says he is still a nut. A broken clock is right twice a day

  • well it's about time he has some common sense.

  • I remember when I first heard about this. I said, "They've got to be taking him out of context, or something."

    Then I watched the clip. WHOA! He finally got something right! Go Pat!

    For once in my life, I agree with you.

  • Not all religious people are crazy so don't go ripping on them The assholes that preach the bible on this forum have no idea what that shit they are saying means. I am neutral but ripping on a religion just because there are some people like that is wrong. Pat Robertson is absolutely correct decriminalization of marijuana would be the best thing for this country. It would generate revenue and it would lessen our prison and jail population. Robertson is usually nuts but not this time.

  • @ingodshandsable I think you have weed mixed up with booze &freedom mixed up w/ dictatorship. Ever read labels on your food? See the term natural flavours? It means hydrolyzed yeast/soyetc. Know what that means? MSG, know what that means? Lesions on the brain. My feeling's people who seek control over the lives of others likely eat too much msg & have holy brains, the amount of freedom hating Americans around these days is concerning. If you eat junk food, won't make me fat- think about that.

  • Comment removed

  • I can't believe what I just saw.  Someone pinch me........

  • At the latest count, thirteen states have enacted medical marijuana laws either by ballot initiative or legislation. Unfortunately, the federal government up to now has selectively used the federalist tenet of states’ rights only when it’s politically convenient to do so.

  • First and foremost, the issue of marijuana as medicine is largely a states’ rights issue. From a purely Constitutional point of view, individual states are empowered to chart their own legislative courses, and act as autonomous, self-determining governing entities that are best suited to adopt laws regarding the health and welfare of their citizens.

  • After seriously investigating the issue, and getting beyond the rhetorical arguments of both sides, I began to realize that the prohibitionist viewpoint against the use of marijuana as medicine largely ignored three things, which are so embedded in the fabric of American society and reflective of our cultural values that their truth is almost self-evident.

  • Former Drug Free America Director David E. Krahl, Ph.D. Endorses Medical Marijuana. "There was a point in my professional career as Deputy Director of the Drug Free America Foundation when I supported the prohibition of marijuana as medicine. But then, I experienced a change of heart, if you will; a moment of clarity, an epiphany.

  • @ingodshandsable I'm not impressed. You've failed prove that you have any idea about what you are talking about. No one has ever thought they were fucking invisible after smoking weed. Unless they were already fucking crazy.

  • @ingodshandsable Invisible? You are so fucking stupid man. Do some research next time.

  • @ingodshandsable You have no idea what marijuana is at all.

  • @ingodshandsable Sorry but eating fast food and sitting around playing video games all day after a nice joint isn't a crime.

  • If the bible said "thou shall not toke" he's be fucking spewing his same hate speech as usual.

  • He's messing with our minds.

  • We all know what Pat is up to back stage now! Keep puffing, old man, and keep sharing your visions with us!

  • I wonder how long Pat Robertson has been on it. Now I know why he comes up with all of those things he says.

  • @jdsantoyo1 wow wow wee wow pots a killa MAaaaan !!!..ZZZZZZ wake up

  • Pat Robertson...talking sense... (head explodes)

  • Wow. I never imagined I'd hear Pat Robertson say something so intelligent and sensible. Good for him for expressing his opinion that probably upset the majority of his narrow-minded viewers

  • Wow. I never imagined I'd hear Pat Robertson say something so intelligent and sensible

  • In Affectionate Love, look at the Greek term found in Revelation 9:21 and 18:23 in the KJV for "sorceries": 5331 farmakeia pharmakeia far-mak-i'-ah, from 5332; ; n f, AV-sorcery 2, witchcraft 1; 3, 1) the use or the administering of drugs. This term is the root word of the term "pharmacy". What do drugs have to do with sorcery? Those who seek spiritual communication with evil spirits and demons in the occult know there are two ways to enhance this, the hard way by transcendental meditation,..

  • ..emptying your mind and inviting them in, and the easy way by altering your consciousness with drugs. This lowers your defenses and opens the doors to evil spirits. Is this advantageous? Is this edifying? Isn't this bringing things to have power over you? Most certainly it does away with the free will and freedom Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa` gives us. Don't be fooled. Deregulation is coming, 3rd Seal, and 4th Seal Great genocidal Persecution. They won't be ready for HIs coming spiritually, or physically.

  • @10yand5hand400t oh shut up you narrow minded twat. Go bug some other video with your crap. Religion makes a person oblivious.

  • @LBJTV, in Affectionate Love, unconscious is what those will be who shall turn to drink and drugs to escape their pain and horror from what is coming upon them unexpectedly because they are in denial, blinded and already unaware [oblivious]. Pat and the rest of the deceivers will assist in deregulation to ensure the numbing slumber of the Many. Food rationing/price controls will increase the temptation. It is inevitable that predication concerning these ones, be fulfilled...

  • @10yand5hand400t You sound like the kind of guy nobody wants to be around. Go and live your boring life full of rules. We're organisms just like a dog, a fish or a microbe. What separates us from them is a higher brain capacity, that is all. Without our evolved brain, we would still be groaning and hunting manually for food like we used to. You have no idea how huge the universe is, the countless amount of other planets there are with a very high probability of other organisms living on them.

  • @LBJTV, in Affectionate Love, Who said anything about "rules"? 1 Qorínthiym 6:12, "All substances are lawful to me, nevertheless NOT ALL things are ADVANTAGEOUS; all substances are lawful to me, nevertheless I will not be brought under the control of any." Maybe you don't want to be around, yet continue to reply. Why do you divert to the size of the universe or the possibility of life on other planets? Control of the masses-food control and drug deregulation, Rev 6:5-6, 3rd Seal, stay on topic.

  • @10yand5hand400t I'm talking about the big picture, not just little things that happen on this planet. People like you are oblivious of what's really going on. You don't think outside the box. You have all these pointless quotes that don't back up shit. I'm just an organism, I'll eat food, i'll do drugs, I won't resort to people controlling me with their useless morals. in the end we rot in the soil, so we may as well enjoy this short human life while we have it

  • @LBJTV, in Affectionate Love, quote - 1 Qorinthíym 15:32 "If merely as a man I fought with beasts at ’Éphesos, what is the profit to me if the dead are not raised? “Let us eat and drink because tomorrow we die!” [Yshá`Yâhuw 22:13] written before you, backed by your statement today: ".., so we may as well enjoy this short human life while we have it". You speak of 'the big picture', yet your fleshly eyes are unable to see the value or purpose of your human life past the 'soil' under your feet.

  • ..Please, enlighten this 'moral one' [who has absolutely NO intention of 'controlling you' in what you eat or what drug you choose to take by the way], as to "what is really going on", "outside the box", as there is nothing new under the sun.

  • @10yand5hand400t What value and purpose? 

  • @LBJTV, in Affectionate Love, Yâ-hwéh has had a plan all along to 'evolve' man, by steps, into becoming elohiym, like Him, so that we may become His brothers, and our Father. Creation is His grand plan for His reproduction. All that is 'really happening', He knows, as nothing is unexpected or a surprise to Him and He planned accordingly, knowing since the foundation of the world. There is a lot to learn and we must do so by free will and earn our rewards rather than be assigned it. He has caused

  • ..all that is 'really happening' [Yâ-hwéh means He causes to be/exist] because there has to be a reason for people to love Yâ-hwéh, to love Goodness. Darkness and evil have to exist for people to prefer Goodness and Light. Yet, He made it so that evil would be a controlled opposition, like a thumb, and to forge His people to be stronger. Again, it is His plan for His reproduction, in stages, and yes, He caused you to exist as part of it. To keep you from just 'rotting in the soil' or your soul..

  • ..to remain in Sh'ówl, He separated Himself from His own Power [aka: the Father], to visit His creation, bringing them Light and Life, teaching them the Way. He valued you enough, to come in Person [aka: the Son], and suffer through death, killed by His enemies and provided a simple method of justification for ALL mankind to rescue them from that sentence. Now just because His means of justification is available to ALL mankind, doesn't mean ALL will accept it BEFORE His return. Free will, stages

  • @10yand5hand400t that does't say anything. Religion is for the weak mind. You really need some invisible deity to help you live your life? Come on, grow up. Yout alk about one god here when there are so many with contradicting values. Which one is right? none, because they are man-made, simply put. And if you can't open your eyes and see that then you have either been brainwashed to the full extent as a young child or plain stupid. If you were born in India, you wouldn't be talking about ya-hweh

  • @LBJTV, in Affectionate Love, that doesn't say anything, to you. What you call weakness, we call reverence. Your carnal mind is limited, unable to comprehend, thus your option is to mock the spiritual mind claiming it to be weak, or plain stupid. You throw the baby out with the bathwater in ignorance, disgusted with man-made establishment religions. You lack will and understanding. You even assume I am here speaking of some 'god', which I am not. Do you even know what the word 'god' means? You..

  • ..also speak of 'some invisible deity'. Deity=demon, which unwittingly appears to be your choice. You ask me to open my eyes, as if they are closed, while it is yours which are sealed shut, along with you ears. 1 Qorinthíym 1:27. "Instead, Yâ-hwéh chose the silly ones of the world in order that He might put to shame the wise ones; and Yâ-hwéh chose the powerless things of the world in order that He might put the mighty things to shame!". 1 Qorinthíym 2:14. "But the animate son of ’Âthâ´m does..

  • ..not accept the things of the Spirit of Yâ-hwéh, for to him they are apparent absurdity; and he is incapable of recognizing them, because they are investigated spiritually!". Your weakness, is that incapability. If there is even one of His, that is currently in India, they shall speak of Yâ-hwéh Yâhuwshúa`, but the time is coming, when even there, they shall acknowledge Him. Your denial does not make His persuasion or His plan for His creation of any less effect.

  • @10yand5hand400t oh stop bullshitting. The word god means many things to many people, it's not relevant. And how are you not speaking of a god when you mention ya-hweh? You're clearly delusional

  • @LBJTV, in Affectionate Love, it means many things to many people because they are unaware of it's true meaning. 'God' is the Hebrew NAME of the Babylonian false deity, 'Fortune', as in the sense of distributing. Fortune distributor translated into Greek=Daemon. It is a common Teutonic word used for an OBJECT of religious worship; formerly applicable to super human beings of heathen myth; upon conversion of the Teutonic peoples to Xianity, the term then applied to Supreme Being. Not that it...

  • ..matters to you, but in YshaYahuw [Isaiah] 65:11,12, it is predicated that people would forsake Yâ-hwéh for 'God', and they shall bow down to and be annihilated by the coming impostor [ - the very Lie they proffer]. Yâ-hwéh is certainly not 'God', very relevant, except to those who lack understanding, and believe spiritual things to be absurdity, of course. Your blindness and ignorance [non-acknowledgment] does not make me the delusional one.

  • ...You still have not responded to the request that you enlighten us as to 'what is really going on', 'outside' this 'box' you speak of. You apparently feel you know what countless millions apparently do not, so please, share your so-called knowledge, intead of utilizing your time mocking the knowledge of others you have no clue about.

  • @10yand5hand400t ye whatever, what is your pint here?

  • I don't know if this helps or hurts the pro-legalization cause. It is amazing to see a right-wing preacher coming around on this subject. But his credibility has been so annihilated over the years, his message carries little weight.

  • Probably about the only thing decent this man has said. But Pat Robertson on the topic of Marijuana or any subject for that matter should be taken with a grain of salt because this man is insane.

  • you know what i find odd is the woman on this show are just ass kissers.The will agree with anything pat says.I do agree with pat here but other times he is a complete asshole.But the chick beside him will agree with whatever he has to say.For fucks sake woman spit his nut sack out of your mouth and form a opinion!

  • All these christians shows are so FF@#$#@ corny, shit man.

    La Ilaha Ilal Lah. God is one, none has the right to b worshipped but him.

    Jesus nothing but his servant and messenger.

    Muhammad slave and messenger of God's last Revelation.

  • PAT ROBERTSON NEEDS A PUFF OF KUSH

  • Google this Time Magazine article: "Drugs in Portugal: Did Decriminalization Work?"

    It was a huge success!!

  • CBN.... love it!

  • You could pay your taxes with Cannabis up until the early 1800's. It was that valuable. Until the cotton gin came out, then cotton became a big deal. Then Reefer Madness propoganda brainwashed everybody with the movie, "Reefer Madness" in 1936. Then Congress was convinced, and the Marihuana(spelled with a H) Tax Act came into effect in 1937. Making Marijuana illegal on a federal level. Up to date, there are 16 states, and the district, that have legalized pot for medicinal purposes.

  • Pat actualy got something right for once

  • :D

  • @ingodshandsable Because those drugs are illegal, and criminals make profits off of illicit drugs. Well, guess what? You legalize those drugs, then they're put into the hands of government regulation. Then, there would be no shooting over criminals protecting their source of revenue. You don't see criminals violently trying to sell legal drugs, do you? Thought not. Jesus turned water into wine for people to drink at the married couple's party. Everything in moderation, son.

  • wow pat robertson said this?? so if he finally is looking at something with sense why is it still illegal.

  • Holy fuck he actually said something that made sense

  • @ingodshandsable It causes crime, because drug dealers wish to protect their money maker (Cannabis). Legalization takes cannabis out of the hands of the drug cartels. If you don't believe me, then when did drug dealers make a profit from alcohol (legal substance)? If you're caught with a joint, then that's a crime, according to the USA. If you legalized it, then it's no problem. If a person wishes to smoke marijuana for recreational use, and doesn't infringe upon my rights, then it's fine.

  • Comment removed

  • FOR THE FIRST TIME I AGREE WITH PAT ROBERTSON!!!!!!! THUMBS UP IF YOU AGREE

  • @ingodshandsable Continued... The American Journal of Addiction 2009 concludes that a combination of both marijuana and alcohol is detrimental to one's driving ability. Anyway, back to the alcohol-only and marijuana-only users in the study. The alcohol users usually weren't aware of their impairment, and they were driving recklessly. Now, the marijuana-only users were aware of their impairment, and they compensated for their intoxication by utilizing a variety of behavioral strategies.

  • *He

  • @ingodshandsable From the government. The National Institute of Cancer, a component of the National Institutes of Health, in April 2011(this year), declared that the cannabinoids have a direct anti-cancer effect. They couldn't keep denying it after all of these years of research that has proven that THC and CBD kills only cancer cells in humans, animals, and petri dishes. God made everything for a purpose, and smoking it isn't what he intended :)

    I currently have bookmarked, over 70 studies.

  • 1 less robot that decided to have a mind of his own, educate and think for himself. I always liked Pat Robertson. God bless him. The only reason it's illegal is because it's the best and most universal natural medicine God gave us.

  • @ingodshandsable It's not "their", but rather "they are". Anywho, we don't have to worry about an increase in car crashes. Since, all of the studies up to date agrees that driving while high is associated with cautious driving. While alcohol use is associated with reckless driving.

  • Romans 13: (1-7) Obey the Laws of the Land....... 8 Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law. (if you love and respect others you will not smoke pot Because it violates the rights of others)

    13 Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. 14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfill the lusts thereof.

  • @8myhomework Sigh*

    Proverbs 31:6-7

    Read that, and don't forget that Jesus turned water into wine. An unjust law is not a law at all, especially if the cannabinoids that are extracted from the cannabis plant kills cancer cells while not affecting the healthy ones.

  • @ingodshandsable hahahahahahahah hahahahahahahah OMG that is great , Show me one study that proves smoking pot leads to larger crimes. One problem, You won't find one. Also Alcohol, cigarettes , Oxy cotton and hundreds of other legal drugs are way worse for you then cannabis. Your argument is silly and invalid.

  • @ingodshandsable WHAT LARGER CRIMES? Cant be any larger then the Cartel making 13 billion dollars a year from marijuana, The thousands of people lying dead with there heads cut off in Juarez.

    And People are already driving stoned, It doesn't impair you anymore then smoking a cigarette. driving and texting is 10x more impairing. Invincible? you've obviously never smoked cannabis before.

  • @ingodshandsable Then educate me on why responsible adult use of cannabis should be illegal.

    Because i know you will be wrong. nice try insulting me.

  • @ingodshandsable Oh, im sorry i forgot your a moron..

    What you think this is korea?? this is a free market society, and in a free market you WILL NOT stop Free Americans to pursue happiness.

  • @ingodshandsable start more crimes how so....... most people who smoke weed don't even feel like doing anything except eat and sleep, they get locked up cuz its illegal.

  • WELL ANDY GRIFFITH

  • You really do feel grimy just agreeing with him. Maybe that says something about our frame of mind.

  • I know pat is right because all the people that hate him are wicked(wicked means bad)

  • SMOKE WEED EVERYDAY

  • I have always had a lot of respect for Pat- he is a real rebel & terrier in his own way He always follows his own convictions never follows the poarty line and shoots from the hip!

  • @bigcoolviking

    Thats the only good thing pat said, about weed. But all the ether bull shit about rejecting science, haiti, guys like me who questian the creationist theology, progressive thought, ect, I dont like him. He is still living in the dark ages and rejects intellectualism

  • Comment removed

  • Damn, i actually agree on something with Robertson.

    I feel dirty now.:(

  • Wow, this is one of the few rational things that Pat Robertson has ever said!

  • Comment removed

  • @floridaman2000 really and were is this proof or shall i look it up myself

  • Comment removed

  • @floridaman2000 Yep... That's why the bootleggers got so powerful after prohibition was lifted... Go somewhere else with your bullshit. If drugs became legal, crime would drop. Drugs would lose their value and the cartels would have to take another country hostage and leave this one (The USA) alone.... This is coming from a right-winger that hates drugs... But I believe in personal freedom... Even if they make dumb choices like doing drugs...

  • @shartasticful You are right look at my video freedom of choice in my channel yes i was dumb for saying that

  • Pot is not addictive and is impossible to O'D on.It is far less harmful than alcohol and I really see no downside to legalisation.At least it'll be us that sets the price,age limits and strength.Better by far than what we have now which is no control at all.Better the tax man than the gangster.

  • really, him?

  • im glad to see that christians are realizing the devastating affects of the war on drugs. people need to gain ownership of their own bodies once again. only the devil would support such a thing as a government regulating people's bodies and waging a war on its citizens for non-violent criminals.... it should be treated just like alcohol

  • "The man who shot gabby giffords was a liberal pothead"...So? In Tucson, Arizona — A jury on Monday found the leader of an Arizona anti-illegal immigration group guilty of two counts of first degree murder in the killings of a father and his 9-year-old daughter in a home invasion. It's not a liberal/conservative thing. It's all mental. Pot didn't contribute :)

    Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty against Shawna Forde, 43, the founder and leader of the Minutemen American Defense group

  • @zekdom Oh no,not a right wing militia leader.I guess it just goes to show,you reap what you sow.

  • @TERRYMCKINNEY32 Come again? I am a conservative though :), but who reaps what they sow?

  • @zekdom everyone

  • @TERRYMCKINNEY32 Well, ok lol...

  • loooooll

  • he has smoked enough in his lifetime

  • very wise words!

  • It is a dried, crushed plant. That's it. Also, this isn't even a left-right-libertarian issue anymore. It has become such a non-partisan issue nowadays that even people like Robertson here are waking up to our ridiculous drug laws. It's time to admit that the War on Drugs is a futile and horribly failed effort on the part of our government.

  • @Wdntkwb1 I agree. I'm a conservative, and I defend my traditions. Cannabis was legal in this country ever since 1619 until 1937. Even if the legality of marijuana is gone. It's still a part of our tradition. Harry Anslinger and William Hearst made marijuana illegal through their coroporate greed that used racist lies as the fuel to convince the populace that blacks smoked it and raped white women! It's a shame.

  • @zekdom The entire drug war is deeply rooted in racism and ignorance.At the turn of the century the most widely used drug was opium.They put it in everything,including teething drops.People have lost the meaning of the difference between use and abuse.There has never in the history of Amerika,been more than 1% of the population abusing opiates.The laws have made only one difference.They put the poor fukers in jail now.Hemp was gonna cost hurst a fortune as he was widely invested in pulp &paper.

  • @TERRYMCKINNEY32 Mm hm. Absolutely! Ah, William was a ___. You fill in the blank :)

  • The notion that marijuana causes violence such as the Arizona shooting is pure, sensationalized, "Reefer Madness"-style propaganda. People drink and do terrible things in addition to puking/picking fights in parking lots. Do we make alcohol illegal? No. We already tried that and it was a miserable failure and ended up lining the pockets of criminals like Al Capone. Prohibition didn't work then, and it doesn't work now. Robertson is right for once. End the insanity of prohibition and legalize it.

  • The Arizona shooter, Jared Loughner was a liberal pothead. In order for a true mental illness to be diagnosed one must be clean for two years for brain chemistry to normalize enough for a proper diagnosis. The left is trying to blame it entirely on mental illness now that it has been established that he was a liberal. (see my About Me for link)

    At first the left not only blamed Palin & Beck for the shooting but campaigned to revoke Palin’s right to freedom of speech.

  • It cannot be anymore dangerous than the crap they put in our water,air and the food supply

  • @wolffl60  I can agree with that, for certain.

  • Wow... I now like Pat Roberson. Who'da thunk.

  • Hi Dallas, I hope you’re having a good day. Some of the posts by other people may be encouraging people to use marijuana by implying that it’s safe. I’m responding to those posts and not to the legalization debate. Ronny changed his mind about getting drunk and stoned after he saw what happened to his party friends; watch?v=CjrRhxgKzHE&feature=re­lated

  • The URL address to the report, excerpted below, will be at the #1 comment at my channel for awhile.

    Long-term marijuana use can lead to addiction; that is, people have difficulty controlling their drug use and cannot stop even though it interferes with many aspects of their lives. It is estimated that 9 percent of people who use marijuana will become dependent on it. The number goes up to about 1 in 6 in those who start using young (in their teens) and to 25–50 percent among daily users.

  • @887631 My friend went three weeks without it. He was fine. According to Dr. Jack E. Henningfield of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, marijuana isn't as addicting compared to caffeine, alcohol, cocaine, heroin, or nicotine. Dr. Neal Benowitz of the University of California also saw that marijuana isn't as addicting compared to alcohol and nicotine. What you described was adults with stress that didn't have their relaxer. Everybody has one. Whether it be beer, t.v., walking, et cetera.

  • @887631 Psh. I know a girl that smokes tobacco and weed. You wanna know what she said? Aiight. This is verbatim,"I can quit marijuana, but I can't stop smoking cigarretes(tobacco)." Mmhm. That's right. They ain't no addictive stimulants in marijuana, unlike tobacco with that nicotine garbage. There is a difference between enjoyment and addiction. Peace out Home homoz schkillet!!!

  • @tnturtlegurl I support the legalization and regulation of cannabis among other drugs. I also support freedom of choice, as long as nobody is unwilling physically harmed in the process or outcome of an individuals actions.

    But, for the record, delta9-THC is a potentially psychologically addictive component occuring in cannabis, and the intoxicating effects of cannabis vary in each individual.

  • @CNSagent Then put more CBD in our weed then! That cannabudiol has been known to be an effective anti-psychotic. I appreciate you edumacating me on the negative effects of cannabis. We will need people to do that in the future when it's legal. But we DO NOT need spoiled brats who want to show off their brain smarts for the con. We need people showing the positive sides of pot, or else you'll see these crazy mother effers using what you said as an excuse not to legalize. Think! Don't betray!

  • @tnturtlegurl ... Video games, television, food or any activity that modulates endogenous neurons that regulate feelings of reward or well-being (such as dopamine, endocannabinoids, endoopioids) have potential for psychological addiction, abuse and dependence. But, cannabis is a psychopharmacological agent. Food, exercise and T.V. are not. I am not trying to demonize cannabis, though.

    Please, excuse me for addressing your false statement.

    (2)

  • @tnturtlegurl ... then I doubt the government is concerned with the addictivness of "soft drugs, let alon the addictivness of more lethal drugs such as tobacco and alcohol.

    You shouldn't worry about little ol' me correcting people on YouTube about the possible adverse effects of cannabis abuse.

    (5)

  • @CNSagent I never said that the government wasn't concerned about the addictiveness of weed. I would say that they do things for their benefit! I never said that it wasn't addicting. If you read my previous text before you went on your cute little rant. You would've seen that I was comparing tobacco to marijuana. Also, I provided anecdotal evidence concerning someone else that smokes both. I was just saying that marijuana isn't as addicting as tobacco. Everybody knows that you can abuse anything

  • @CNSagent and all. Still, people will look at both sides. If one side is spreading nothing but negative information, then they will look at the other side. If the other side mentions even the slightest of negativity, and there is still zero positivity on the other side. Which side do you think they will pick? They don't care about the person giving out the info. They only care about "will this affect my kids?", "will this verify the stigma that I have been subjected to?", and such. (Cont.)

  • @tnturtlegurl ... you will see that I just posted a quote last night about the antitumor effects of THC when combined with CDB in the treatment of brain cancer on zekdom's comment board. I first came to know zekdom when he was posting exactly the same thing he has posted on this page; biased info. But, I can respect his efforts, just as I respect your's, but zekdom's quotes do mention "dependence" and "addiction," so they are not 100% biased...

    (3)

  • @CNSagent You have to consider if you're supposed lack of bias is what the people need? Do people need to continue to add onto the already stated con side, or do people need an all-out pro side? The cons will speak for themselves. People already know that you can abuse anything. People already know that all smoke is harmful. We all know this. We need people like EssiacHempLaetrile, Zekdom, and you to give us the pro and nothing but the pro. Then we, the people, will decide.

  • @tnturtlegurl ... I agree, there is no need to dwell on the negatives, especially when there are plenty of people misinforming others with incorrect claims about cannabis use in redards to lung cancer, brain damage, etc., but I will not disregard the facts.

    I have corrected quite a few people about the addictiveness of cannabis, but I have also corrected many other about the positive effects of cannabinoids. If you look at zekdom's channel...

    (2)

  • @CNSagent Did you just say psychologically addicting????? BWAHAHA!!! Boy you are alright. What about them World of Warcraft players? Video games and the like. Anything can be addicting pyschologically! But I know this one girl that smokes tobacco on a regular basis. She doesn't smoke as much marijuana as she used to. The way I view it. Physically addicting is worse than psychological, from the people that I've seen. I sent you another comment earlier. Read that too.

  • @tnturtlegurl I have provided plenty of people (including zekdom) with positive information regarding cannabis.

    Honestly, as condescending as I am, I'd like to think I am more informed on the subject of cannabinoids than you are.

    You are trying to compare nicotine to cannabis. Nicotine is psychologically and physiologically addictive. Cannabis is only psychologically addictive.

    Antidepressants, amphetamines, cocaine and many other drugs are also only "psychologically addictive."

    (1)

  • @CNSagent It's no prob Bob. Like I said. Boy, you are aiight. Just to be clear as crystal though. What did I say that was a false statement? Be specific. I believe I made a comparison to a female friend of mine that could easily quit marijuana, but couldn't quit tobacco. Boy, I'll tell you this much. She was shivering from withdrawals from that nicotine garbage. She got better when she smoked some of that tobacco. I never said that it wasn't addictive, just not like with tobacco.

  • @tnturtlegurl No offense, but here is what set me off: "They aint no addictive stimulants in marijuana..."

    Zekdom's quotes regarding cancer are fine, but quotes regarding addiction can be contradicted. I'm not saying that the National Institute of Medicine is biased, I'm saying some zekdom's comments are, but for the majority, his comments are "balanced," as you said. As you, and zekdom have told me, there's no need to dwell on the negatives, but I'm paraphrasing of course...

    (1)

  • @tnturtlegurl ... I forgot to mention caffeine.

    Caffeine is the most widely used psychologically and physiologically addictive substance on earth. In a sense, caffeine is more "addictive" than cannabis, but the degree of "euphoric effects" produced by caffeine is not as immense as cannabis.

    If children, adolescents and adults all aroud the world are physiologically dependent on caffeine, a perfectly legal, acceptable and easily attainable drug,...

    (4)

  • @tnturtlegurl ... By the way, I am unbiased on the subject of cannabis. I have been using cannabis for more than seven years, and I since I started I've been thoroughly interested in cannabis.

    (3)

  • @CNSagent No offense hun...but when you said that you are unbiased on that cannabis of yours. You also stated that you smoked it. You have to understand how people think. It doesn't matter if you go around saying "marijuana is psychologically addicting". Trying to sound unbiased to make yourself feel better. People will look at that, and call you a mere "pot head". Do you understand what "trolls" are? They spread info that is completely biased. I can understand you trying to sound balanced(Cont.

  • @tnturtlegurl ... Anyway, I will try to restrain myself from contributing to the negative biased side, but I will not abandon my beliefs. My very first reply is where I stand on the subject of "addiction" in regards to cannabis, and as you can see, it's an unbiased statement.

    Once again, I appreciate your intentions, please, excuse my attitude, and take care.

    (4)

  • @CNSagent (Cont.) Well, I've seen quotes that zekdom provided. I don't think the second highest rated comment is biased. That Institute on Medicine claimed that pot smoke contains the same carcinogens as tobacco smoke. But they also said that dependece for marijuana is not as bad compared to other drugs. That zek seems to provide balanced info if someone says otherwise. But he does give a lot of info for the pro side. Whatever. Imma chill like a penguin lacking a tuxedo tonight! Peace holmes!

  • @tnturtlegurl ... Yeah, nicotine addiction, dependence and withdrawal is complicated. Nicotine affects a multitude of neurons, including endogenous cannabinoids. It's been sugested that nicotine addiction and withdrawal are partially attrubuted to endogenous opioids. In many researchers opinions, nicotine is more addictive than cannabis as well as a few other illicit substances.

    Take care.

    (2)

  • @CNSagent Oh that lil post? Mm fine. It's just seems so...mild. Yeah! Mild is the word that is heard. Hmm mm. Especially with my girl-friend(I ain't no lesbo). You can totally see a difference between that tobacco and that weed usage dont'cha know? I appreciate you talking, and all that. As my contemporary issues teacher said,"Contributions make the class more enjoyable and pleasant." Or whatever he said. He's adorably nutty lol.

  • @tnturtlegurl Yes, I can recognize the difference between cannabis and tobacco use and abuse. However, cannabis and tobacco do activate similar neurons and receptors, and studies have shown that nicotine modulates the endocannabinoids (e.g. The Endogenous Cannabinoid System Modulates Nicotine Reward and Dependence/ J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008/ PMCID: PMC2746999).

    "Just try to avoid the temptation of stomping an ignorant person." LOL. Seriously though, I will try to contain my self...

    (1)

  • @CNSagent (Cont.) Yeah, I guess that one person's addiction anecdote can be different from some other guy's experience with addiction. Zek is definitely pro lol. But that quote above us seemed balanced enough. You seem balanced too. Just try to avoid the temptation of stomping an ignorant person. Your stomping of some actual pot head(I know some teenagers that are for weed..annoying sometimes). Can allow some person to be instilled with that info, look at yours, then be against pot. You cool tho

  • @tnturtlegurl ... I appreciate your comments, and I appologize for my inconsiderate attitude. Take care.

    By the way, you mentioned smoking being bad. Well, here is a quote by Robert Melamede from a very informative article.

    "Cannabinoids receptors have not been reported in respiratory epithelial cells (in skin they prevent cancer), and hence the DNA damage checkpoint mechanism should remain intact after prolonged cannabis exposure...

    (2)

  • @tnturtlegurl ... Furthermore, nicotine promotes tumor angiogenesis whereas cannabis inhibits it."- Cannabis and tobacco smoke are not equally carcinogenic/ Harm Reduct J. 2005/ PMCID: PMC1277837

    (3)

  • @CNSagent Well...that sounds interesting n' all, but I'm dead-beat tired. Imma going to my bed, and I'm going to fall asleep in it. See ya hun. It's all chill btwn you n I :)

  • @CNSagent (Continued) The cons will speak for themselves, and the all out negative side that is the DEA will give the people plenty of negative info. Marijuana is still a Schedule 1 Drug??? Hun, I think you know that we need an all pro-side, because there is already an all-con side. You don't have to agree, and I slighlty respect you trying to be balanced, but you smoke cannabis. I'm sorry, but people will pick up on that and ignore everything you just said. Whether it be pro, or con.

  • @tnturtlegurl I understand what you mean, but I will not ignore what I know to be true.

    This coversations began with an incorrect statement, and considering what you have stated, that incorrect statement might as well have been an outrigt lie. However, I can appreciate your position and your intentions, to an extent. I just don't like to see statements that I know are not true, and as I said, I have a condescending attitude. Hopefully, you can excuse that...

    (1)

  • Marijuana addiction is also linked to a withdrawal syndrome similar to that of nicotine withdrawal, which can make it hard to quit. People trying to quit report irritability, sleeping difficulties, craving, and anxiety. They also show increased aggression on psychological tests, peaking approximately 1 week after they last used the drug.(pg. 7) In one study, it was estimated that marijuana users have a 4.8-fold increase in the risk of heart attack in the first hour after smoking the drug.

  • they will use our power to make what ever they want because we are all busy, then right under your nose BOOM! we are all in slavery! study the history of hitler and compaire it to now..wake up america this is our beautiful country dont let "the strangers" take your freedom its already started so we need to hurry up stick very close to gether,get along and speak up take time to change,speak up,sign petitions, legally protest without harming anyone, BE AMERICANS GOD DAMB IT!before its too late!

  • i mean how can someone be a district attorny that the whole world hates, an egotisical female gone mad with power my god, its like a bunch kids with power telling us there are our boss, NO WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE BOSS..the government is here for us but because we dont take time out of our lives to protest,sign to change laws that will bebefit us

  • it is the judges duty to find this out, the kid was suppose to get theropy not a sentance...the judges are not doing there job! We as people have the power and need to contunially speak out not against the system,sign petitions and take time out of our busy lives to change how these laws,justice system works

  • What the so called justice system should be doing is finding out the truth, the judges are not doing there job and allowing things to happen, they yell at you,make u feel uncomfortable this is psychological warfare. YOU LOSE! if a person hits someone thrown in jail, he has no money,hes nevous gates are clashing,court date comes, his lawyer tell him to take a plea or X will happen,this person is slammed wit a felony, years later he finds out he has bipolar. THIS IS INJUSTICE...

  • What the so called justice system should be doing is finding out the truth, the judges are not doing there job and allowing things to happen, they yell at you,make u feel uncomfortable this is psychological warfare. YOU LOSE! if a person hits someone thrown in jail, he has no money,hes nevous gates are clashing,court date comes, his lawyer tell him to take a plea or X will happen,this person is slammed wit a felony, years later he finds out he has bipolar. THIS IS INJUSSTICE...

  • There no longer is a fair justice system. good people with problems are being imprision,given felonies,all the lawyers,judges,district attorneys hang out together and make deals over coffee, an 19 year old kid was conviceted because he was with a 17 year old, now he has a criminal record,thats just bull! now he's a sex offender..wow be careful people, this can happen to you, once you have an accident you can wind up with a sentence.

  • Pat Robertson must me related to Bush and involved in 911 inside jobs... they are both very bad Christians...

    Pat Robertson must me related to Bush and involved in 911 inside jobs... they are both very bad Christians...

    Pat Robertson must me related to Bush and involved in 911 inside jobs... they are both very bad Christians...

    Pat Robertson must me related to Bush and involved in 911 inside jobs... they are both very bad Christians...

  • They should legalise pot bc it's not addicting and does no harm to u like cancer but ciggerettes give you cancer and addicting weed is better for u than drinking bear bc has addicting and can get liver problems it's retarded LEGALISE POT already fuckin chodes fuckin Obama

  • wtf! this shit is crazy. i never heard a remotely rational word out of this man before i watched this.