Despite all the doomsaying, this documentary was pretty optimistic about technology. Especially in the realms of AI and genetics--which we soon found were far more complicated puzzles to solve than we first thought.
@wolfchimneyrock Nope. If you want the whole picture, Idiocracy is what we get, and Future Shock is what the ruling class get. Notice how in Idiocracy there were systems in place that even the President hadn't figured out? How did they get those machines that they used for their "ID Tattoos" etc? ;)
@james1200 Long ago, it would have been "right wing" to oppose the draft. . . that's when "right wing" was actually called liberal (maximum freedom, minimum government, human rights, the individual will), and "left wing" was some other thing called socialism (maximum government control, virtually no freedom, impossible to define "workers rights", eugenics, and even mass murder).
Today both wings are closer to the left wing of the time. Not much of the old "liberalism".
@terramortim You have no idea what you're talking about. Liberal in the 60's is Liberal now. You're thinking about the 18th century where what's now called Classic Liberalism is today's equal to Conservatism. Stop drinking the Glenn Beck kool-aid and read and learn for yourself.
@james1200 I'm not a fan of Glen Beck. He cries too much, and rubs me the wrong way.
I am perfectly aware of what I was talking about. The modern liberal position isn't totally what the 1960s liberal position was, but I was talking about the 18th and 19th century versions of liberalism. WIth that said, the 1960s liberal position was far more libertarian and anti-statist than the current one is. I would put the modern liberal position closer to the 1930s collectivist models of Stalin or Hitler.
@james1200 For a perfect example, I'd like you to watch the entirety of Martin Luther King's "I have a dream speech". What is he talking about? He's talking about the constitution, natural rights, etc. . . Although I was mostly talking about 18th and 19th century liberalism (i.e. Classical liberalism), 1960s liberalism was not exactly the modern version either.
I've read enough history books to view Glen Beck as the character actor that he is, even if I agree with him every so often (rarely)
@james1200 Regarding socialism, before it was called socialism, it had other names. It's not a new system, and Marx didn't come up with it. For example, the American colonies in the early 17th century were operated under a system virtually identical to communism. . . they just called it Feudalism. Same system, different name.
This book and film are both idiotic. Technology is GOOD for mankind. Today, if I break my leg, I can just dial 911, and I'll get help. Back in the middle ages, I'd be screwed for life. Fuck that. Gimme that gold old "FUTURE SHOCK" anytime.
Technology is; and has always been the back door way that commen people can throw off the bonds of oppression. The totalitarian always wants to limit peoples access to and use of technology. They always attack and poullute knowledge. Learn, study, invent, communicate.
Alvin Toffler was really good at informing those Asians that industrialism wasn't the way to go! HAH!
Can anyone even calculate the misuse of 'old'' firearm technology? How many dead because of the simple gun? Billions? Before that, Toledo steel blades? Before that, the sharpened stick or the well-aimed rock?
Predictions always fail. Sentimental memories are always wrong. Escape from change is a limiting of the self.
Control technology, the way Sony tried to stop VHS porn!
orson welles is in a film' talking about future shock to marriage' funny' considering he was married 3 times back in the good ol days of the 30's and 40's-50's and was also known as a poon hound who was a big fan of the one night stand' but his era was more simple and better...right
This documentary was made at the end of the last progressive period in American society. This whiplash could have been the catalyst for the great thirty years of darkness to follow. Look at what little has been accomplished beyond the predictions of this documentary! I guess "Future Shock" accomplished it's objective, "shut it down!"
I agree that the sound track is very groovy, and it does help give it a vintage feel. I find it very interesting that
Toffler was dead on accurate about the dangers of industrialization being placed on a pedestal, esp. since China and India have done just that. The 1970's pollution we the US created is being duplicated and exceeded by both China and India today. In some regards we haven't gotten as advanced as they predicted.
That's hysterical, that they thought we'd be in a genetic race toward increased genius, when in fact our society is so dumbed down now, that Mike Judges "Idiocracy"
In the 70s they had some odd notions about how to musically score things. I mean some of the music directly violates the tone of the documentary. It is kind of baffling as to what that was about. There must have been some prevalent aesthetic or school of thought that found the high school jazz band sound very appealing.
@krazygrrrl Well, as who he used to be I'd rather see him lively and optimistic technology supporter not a fatter older man becoming pesimistic as he gets older :/
To hold back innovation so that you may take your time to become comfortable with it seems silly to me. Hold on to that stance and see if you don't get passed by.
One of the most important things a man has, is a connection with nature, todays fast pace makes us, loose that connection. World needs fast, hard working labor force, not free spiritualy developed people. Technology and its products are here to pull us in its vicous circle. Ask yourself what is the amount of free will people poses today? Slaves shall serve. Serve or die.
Technology is good. Those who hate technology are stupid and that's it. Return to Bonanza and let us live with our fancy modern toasters and electric shocks, whatever. :)
I see a parallel of sorts between your attitude and that of crusaders or other fanatics. The point raised in this segment of the film is that we've essentially idolized science, and that science as an institution is now threatening our other institutions. IMO it's a valid point, not that it's inevitable that science will destroy other institutions, but that it's possible, and that we ought to be skeptical about the wisdom of letting that happen.
I am a man that seeks imortality for me and for everybody. I had a terrible experience with a relative of mine and since then I simply hate that there isn't anything to do against old age and cancer. For this, I am a fanatic and shall forever be, of science at any cost. But I know that science is now used for encarcerating us. I'm sorry if I offended you , sincerely.
No, you didn't at all. I'm only pointing out something I think is important to notice.
What price immortality? It is attractive per se, but could it cost us more than it would be worth? What if we became immortal but were no longer truly human?
I'm not trying to dissuade you, only to encourage you to proceed wisely.
You know...maybe our human form has reached it's limit. I don't know. What would we lose ? What would we gain ? Perhaps the total transformation is inevitable. These are truly hard problems, but we must sacrifice I think for discovering it. I would try, maybe others would try and if anything goes wrong you could destroy us. I think at least a part of our race should try. For evolution...I don't know, we must escape this game of hasard that nature plays with us.
Maybe the truth is a third unforseen solution. If I become a simple machine then what's the use ? :) No love, no hate, no higher feelings , but pure information.
I get your point. However, since when being human became a privileged status ? Now I'm just a bit malitious. I sound like a tin robot from the 60's. By the way, I love old sci-fis. :)
I've watched the entire documentary with my brother. We've been hypnotized by the strange techno-vintage vision. :) We also watch Buck Rogers and and The outer Limits from the 60's. :))By the way, I subscribed to your channel.
These old documentaries are great! Some of the info is highly speculative and entirely wrong but there's quite a bit that's turned out true as well. You should check out the mondo films from the 60's and 70's too but they can be a bit stomach churning.
Oh my gosh, eugenetics propoganda, the USA was doing that back in the 30's as was Hitler! Hahahaha electrical implants for personal shock treatment! And since when have Americans ever been free from the pharmaceutical drug pushers, just turn on a tv and see the ads for drugs just like the old snake oil salesmen! Future shock, spaceports and megacities, hmm terrible how the world of today has them, we're all so worse off, actually the city does look like Las Vegas or Los Angeles...
1:15 Nice little example of unnecessary animal cruelty for the betterment of science. (Note the face of the rat as its little body tries to deal with the overwhelming wave of pain the good professor gives it for no apparent reason).
The advance of science is and aught to be unstoppable. Unless of course a Republican president is elected into power who bends to the religious right and hinders all advancement of science. (U.S)
0:50 I wrote a thesis on A. H. Nayfeh back when I was earning my masters. You can find his musings in the "RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY". (Translated from Prikladnaya Mekhanika, Vol. 24) 1969.
Multiple computational aspects of the numerical implementation are discussed.
Some good examples of propagation of an incident plane wave over a circular-type shoal are presented (based on Born approximation)
Actually, the problems we face today are going to look like absolute child's play when we are faced with the inevitable problem of over population. That's going to be truly depressing.
Realize that you might be talking about a small percentage of people that might not want to have kids based on a geographical location. I assume your in the US, but consider population shifts around the globe as well. (IE China with 1/3 of the worlds population.) Its hard to tell what will happen.
Don't count on it. That figure is also way off - a large percentage of women are undocumented. Plus, women will migrate from North Korea, Mongolia and Central Asia - b/c that's where the money/security is gathering in Asia.
Unmarried male populations don't sit and wither, they fight for resources. A lot of women are going to go into prostitution. The rest of the world should keep its fingers crossed that China doesn't invite a war w/ the West or India to diffuse its excess testosterone.
groovey music after 7:00. Alvin is right, Industrialism is not the only way. We've tasted the apple and now we're hooked. We sold this way of life to a world with exponential population growth. Now what? See the movie Koyannisqatsi and you may understand.
Two things are being conflated here: technological change, and social breakdown. Computers cause hippies, sexual perversion, and riots - that's the message. Your stress isn't caused by bad people screwing with the culture. It's caused by transistors. Don't like long-haired freaks, uneasy because of inflation? Solution: take a sledgehammer to your artificial heart or electric typewriter.
Say no to certain technologies? Morons. They were so overwhelmed by their fears of all the new things happening around them that they failed to realize that hindering technology is hindering knowledge. Just about all technology is a double edged sword in that almost every advancement made by mankind has both good and bad applications. Should we abandon everything that can potentially be used for evil even if it would mean wonderful benefits for society?
Toffler doesn't advocate rejecting all technology. We need to be informed and active to reject technology that threatens our health, safety, and long-term survival.
In his latest book "revolutionary wealth" he goes into more detail about the benefits of what he calls the "information age" or information economy. He also addresses the subject in that he wants people to be informed.
"the consequences of what we do today...determines what tomorrow will bring"
plastack 4 weeks ago
9:40 oh, so THATS why technology is being suppressed, its to reduce future shock...
i thought it was just because corporations wanted money or some shit but i respect them now
BeakyRed 1 month ago
I don't think technology's the threat.It's how people misuse it,as they inevitably do-from Hiroshima/Nagasaki on down to texting while driving.
exeuroweenie 2 months ago
I hope there will be lots of young Elizabeth Taylor's to go around.
journeyquest1 3 months ago
@8:45 explains our massive failure circa 2011
kingalow1 6 months ago
Despite all the doomsaying, this documentary was pretty optimistic about technology. Especially in the realms of AI and genetics--which we soon found were far more complicated puzzles to solve than we first thought.
cybersalad 1 year ago
Hmm, the technology could destroy us...
Read Disconnect by Devra Davis, maybe cellular technology isn't as safe as they say it is!
HalcyonicRepose 1 year ago
Wells can make anything sound ominous with that voice of his...
james1200 1 year ago
@james1200 heard that he was going to do the voice of Darth Vader b4 James Earl Jones got it
MrJacMac1986 4 months ago
From 1:50 I had the most amusing time watching this film.... :d LOL LOL LOL!
avelione 1 year ago
the fear of the future is apparently represented by the sound of the oboe...lets burn those wind instruments quick and save mankind
jaytv777 1 year ago 2
@jaytv777 I 100% agree !!!!
avelione 1 year ago
As Bart Simpson would say "Wow! Man"
PAM2167 1 year ago
Orson Wells ate the future.
FuUberFu 1 year ago
does this contradict or coincide with predictions in the film idiocracy?
wolfchimneyrock 1 year ago
@wolfchimneyrock Nope. If you want the whole picture, Idiocracy is what we get, and Future Shock is what the ruling class get. Notice how in Idiocracy there were systems in place that even the President hadn't figured out? How did they get those machines that they used for their "ID Tattoos" etc? ;)
Mike Judge is a genius.
terramortim 1 year ago
Future Shock or Shock from the Past?
mccarrpo 1 year ago
If I lived back in 1972, I would have been a cop. So I could beat the fuck out of communist hippie losers with a bat.
mccarrpo 1 year ago
@mccarrpo If you lived in 1972, you'd be too busy trying to avoid the draft to beat anyone up, you fucking right-wing pussy!
james1200 1 year ago
@james1200 Long ago, it would have been "right wing" to oppose the draft. . . that's when "right wing" was actually called liberal (maximum freedom, minimum government, human rights, the individual will), and "left wing" was some other thing called socialism (maximum government control, virtually no freedom, impossible to define "workers rights", eugenics, and even mass murder).
Today both wings are closer to the left wing of the time. Not much of the old "liberalism".
terramortim 1 year ago
@terramortim You have no idea what you're talking about. Liberal in the 60's is Liberal now. You're thinking about the 18th century where what's now called Classic Liberalism is today's equal to Conservatism. Stop drinking the Glenn Beck kool-aid and read and learn for yourself.
james1200 1 year ago
@james1200 I'm not a fan of Glen Beck. He cries too much, and rubs me the wrong way.
I am perfectly aware of what I was talking about. The modern liberal position isn't totally what the 1960s liberal position was, but I was talking about the 18th and 19th century versions of liberalism. WIth that said, the 1960s liberal position was far more libertarian and anti-statist than the current one is. I would put the modern liberal position closer to the 1930s collectivist models of Stalin or Hitler.
terramortim 1 year ago
@terramortim
Of course you would. Because that's the narrative you're fed, and which you accept without question.
cephal0p0d 4 months ago in playlist More videos from invasive
@james1200 For a perfect example, I'd like you to watch the entirety of Martin Luther King's "I have a dream speech". What is he talking about? He's talking about the constitution, natural rights, etc. . . Although I was mostly talking about 18th and 19th century liberalism (i.e. Classical liberalism), 1960s liberalism was not exactly the modern version either.
I've read enough history books to view Glen Beck as the character actor that he is, even if I agree with him every so often (rarely)
terramortim 1 year ago
@james1200 Regarding socialism, before it was called socialism, it had other names. It's not a new system, and Marx didn't come up with it. For example, the American colonies in the early 17th century were operated under a system virtually identical to communism. . . they just called it Feudalism. Same system, different name.
terramortim 1 year ago
Too much change too soon can be detrimental.
Try getting that message through the arrogant skulls of 'progressives', Orson.
shockadelicaustralia 1 year ago
the floatings was sick! I loved it!!!!!! The world was destroyed yet by technology!!!
Technology will be humanities salvation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
j3wrnmiguitarist 1 year ago
This shit sucks to learn, because everybody else is just blissfully unaware...
Knowledge is a bitch.
666ouroboro 1 year ago
Did Orson Welles just say "NEW-Clee-ur"?
phlashba 1 year ago
that blond chick at the end is technologically doable all night long!!!!
rrrjjjmmm100 1 year ago 2
This book and film are both idiotic. Technology is GOOD for mankind. Today, if I break my leg, I can just dial 911, and I'll get help. Back in the middle ages, I'd be screwed for life. Fuck that. Gimme that gold old "FUTURE SHOCK" anytime.
MacoutesGabber 1 year ago
HAHAHA, "NUCULAR". How retarded. Why do people say "nucular"? How moronic.
pauswa1966 1 year ago
The whole concept of cryogenics -- GROSS.
pauswa1966 1 year ago
The secret of life itself -- in the MATRIX. :) Hilarious film. Thanks for posting it.
The floating Orson Wells head was cool. Drop some acid and look at that groovy scene! Far out!
pauswa1966 1 year ago
2:08 energy drinks....fast food...pills...wow so many relative examples could be made...
00MORDRED 1 year ago
holy shit I'd like to wake my wife up like that!!!
BZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
00MORDRED 1 year ago
... tI MISS THE ROTARY PHONES...
SmegmoliO 1 year ago
LMFAO @ Gene Therapy being scary. I hate old ass shit,
Composer1777 1 year ago
The idea of nano-technology sure saved cryonics ass, man
roskildahphreak 1 year ago
the Synthesizer in this is awesome, so dated and modernistic!
ybunnygurl 1 year ago
Oh my god. So it was Orson Welles, and NOT George W. Bush that started the whole "nucular" pronunciation of nuclear!!!
Listen carefully at 6:32 and at 6:37. He totally says "nucular".
JoshSitar 1 year ago 6
Technology is; and has always been the back door way that commen people can throw off the bonds of oppression. The totalitarian always wants to limit peoples access to and use of technology. They always attack and poullute knowledge. Learn, study, invent, communicate.
KunsanMom 1 year ago 2
This portion is entirely hinted in the Matrix.
Rhetorikol 1 year ago
I just want a big fondue' party, in an environment full of robots, who happen to be in group marriages, and can validate my parking.
Teflon65 1 year ago 2
@Teflon65 Do you want the robots performing on each other? or you want the PG-13 version or Disney version?
QuantumProphet 1 year ago
@QuantumProphet As long as they validate my parking ticket, I guess it doesn't matter.
Teflon65 1 year ago
Wasn't Toffler optimistic about the future? I thought he wrote that third wave post-industrialism would usher in a bright techno-utopia.
marxotube 1 year ago
@marxotube he envisoned a brigh techo-utopia and all we got is Raeggeton LOL
QuantumProphet 1 year ago
Alvin Toffler was really good at informing those Asians that industrialism wasn't the way to go! HAH!
Can anyone even calculate the misuse of 'old'' firearm technology? How many dead because of the simple gun? Billions? Before that, Toledo steel blades? Before that, the sharpened stick or the well-aimed rock?
Predictions always fail. Sentimental memories are always wrong. Escape from change is a limiting of the self.
Control technology, the way Sony tried to stop VHS porn!
CTHULHUSURVIVOR 2 years ago
"The world powers would soon develop genetic engineering capable of increasing the output of geniuses."
You have my cell number, please call me when that happens.
dfirest1 2 years ago
Damn, my battery pack died today....I am so bummed
NotCrazyLikeU 2 years ago
Love getting a lecture about family and permanency from an obese, alcoholic philanderer....you go, Orson!
NotCrazyLikeU 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
lambchopxoxo 2 years ago
love the electroshock mood device haha
immortalPhoenix1986 2 years ago 3
orson welles is in a film' talking about future shock to marriage' funny' considering he was married 3 times back in the good ol days of the 30's and 40's-50's and was also known as a poon hound who was a big fan of the one night stand' but his era was more simple and better...right
meh97 2 years ago
This documentary was made at the end of the last progressive period in American society. This whiplash could have been the catalyst for the great thirty years of darkness to follow. Look at what little has been accomplished beyond the predictions of this documentary! I guess "Future Shock" accomplished it's objective, "shut it down!"
dandelionpaws 2 years ago 3
shut what down?
Dangoxs 2 years ago
The Concord came and went.we've created landfills far beyond their expectations. Had they only known bottled water bottles would fill landfills!
themarkhopkinsshow 2 years ago
I agree that the sound track is very groovy, and it does help give it a vintage feel. I find it very interesting that
Toffler was dead on accurate about the dangers of industrialization being placed on a pedestal, esp. since China and India have done just that. The 1970's pollution we the US created is being duplicated and exceeded by both China and India today. In some regards we haven't gotten as advanced as they predicted.
themarkhopkinsshow 2 years ago 2
That's hysterical, that they thought we'd be in a genetic race toward increased genius, when in fact our society is so dumbed down now, that Mike Judges "Idiocracy"
is well ahead of it's prediction.
themarkhopkinsshow 2 years ago 2
In the 70s they had some odd notions about how to musically score things. I mean some of the music directly violates the tone of the documentary. It is kind of baffling as to what that was about. There must have been some prevalent aesthetic or school of thought that found the high school jazz band sound very appealing.
psychicwhoosh 2 years ago
lol
selatik1 2 years ago
@psychicwhoosh I believe they were probably all just stoned out of their minds, man.
tigerlilyxoxo 1 year ago
Perhaps Mr. Wells was the greatest doomsayer of all time!!!
krazygrrrl 2 years ago 13
and Wells was also the biggest sell-out of the 20th century....
selatik1 2 years ago
@krazygrrrl Well, as who he used to be I'd rather see him lively and optimistic technology supporter not a fatter older man becoming pesimistic as he gets older :/
avelione 1 year ago
@krazygrrrl Perhaps, unfortunately, he seems to have been right. We don't even realize it.
terramortim 1 year ago
sounds like transhumanism....
RealDeepInSight 2 years ago 3
I didn't like what that guy did to the rat at 1.18....not nice
davidgrahamscott 2 years ago
electrical shock to get you going in the morning? Red Bull takes care of that
justme632 2 years ago
Sounds like my dad complaining about the internet and why it's evil , lol
sapphirerose666 2 years ago
To hold back innovation so that you may take your time to become comfortable with it seems silly to me. Hold on to that stance and see if you don't get passed by.
aduecey 2 years ago
One of the most important things a man has, is a connection with nature, todays fast pace makes us, loose that connection. World needs fast, hard working labor force, not free spiritualy developed people. Technology and its products are here to pull us in its vicous circle. Ask yourself what is the amount of free will people poses today? Slaves shall serve. Serve or die.
WarriorOfModernDeath 2 years ago
A man chooses, a slave obeys.
yaosio 2 years ago
Yes my friend, it was that way since the dawn of mankind.
WarriorOfModernDeath 2 years ago
Technology is good. Those who hate technology are stupid and that's it. Return to Bonanza and let us live with our fancy modern toasters and electric shocks, whatever. :)
BADAWYY 2 years ago
I see a parallel of sorts between your attitude and that of crusaders or other fanatics. The point raised in this segment of the film is that we've essentially idolized science, and that science as an institution is now threatening our other institutions. IMO it's a valid point, not that it's inevitable that science will destroy other institutions, but that it's possible, and that we ought to be skeptical about the wisdom of letting that happen.
11Jamie11 2 years ago 3
I am a man that seeks imortality for me and for everybody. I had a terrible experience with a relative of mine and since then I simply hate that there isn't anything to do against old age and cancer. For this, I am a fanatic and shall forever be, of science at any cost. But I know that science is now used for encarcerating us. I'm sorry if I offended you , sincerely.
BADAWYY 2 years ago
No, you didn't at all. I'm only pointing out something I think is important to notice.
What price immortality? It is attractive per se, but could it cost us more than it would be worth? What if we became immortal but were no longer truly human?
I'm not trying to dissuade you, only to encourage you to proceed wisely.
11Jamie11 2 years ago
You know...maybe our human form has reached it's limit. I don't know. What would we lose ? What would we gain ? Perhaps the total transformation is inevitable. These are truly hard problems, but we must sacrifice I think for discovering it. I would try, maybe others would try and if anything goes wrong you could destroy us. I think at least a part of our race should try. For evolution...I don't know, we must escape this game of hasard that nature plays with us.
BADAWYY 2 years ago
Maybe the truth is a third unforseen solution. If I become a simple machine then what's the use ? :) No love, no hate, no higher feelings , but pure information.
BADAWYY 2 years ago
Then you're just a computer. Not human.
ottoskidoo 2 years ago
I get your point. However, since when being human became a privileged status ? Now I'm just a bit malitious. I sound like a tin robot from the 60's. By the way, I love old sci-fis. :)
BADAWYY 2 years ago
I love tin robots from the 60's
davidgrahamscott 2 years ago
I've watched the entire documentary with my brother. We've been hypnotized by the strange techno-vintage vision. :) We also watch Buck Rogers and and The outer Limits from the 60's. :))By the way, I subscribed to your channel.
BADAWYY 2 years ago
These old documentaries are great! Some of the info is highly speculative and entirely wrong but there's quite a bit that's turned out true as well. You should check out the mondo films from the 60's and 70's too but they can be a bit stomach churning.
davidgrahamscott 2 years ago
Some of the info is highly speculative and entirely wrong????? My friend i think u dont understand nothing at all!!!!
Tikkiroll 2 years ago
When you think that in the 70's THEY thought they have problems, it becomes hilarious. :)
BADAWYY 2 years ago 2
"is technology always desirable?" yes, if it's concorde!
smallritual 2 years ago
keeping us scared... yep, not much has changed since '72.
ilovemayo123 3 years ago
This American Life had an interesting (and depressing) piece on the early cryonics movement :)
nutherefurlong 3 years ago
Prozac and Google. It's happen!
buttdagger 3 years ago
Oh my gosh, eugenetics propoganda, the USA was doing that back in the 30's as was Hitler! Hahahaha electrical implants for personal shock treatment! And since when have Americans ever been free from the pharmaceutical drug pushers, just turn on a tv and see the ads for drugs just like the old snake oil salesmen! Future shock, spaceports and megacities, hmm terrible how the world of today has them, we're all so worse off, actually the city does look like Las Vegas or Los Angeles...
GlobalFilmmaker 3 years ago
eek... the 70s. What a horrible time to be alive.
kafkask 3 years ago
Hahaha born 1985 :-)
DJLorenzen 3 years ago
1990 bitches! XD but i would've liked to see the poppin 80's :(
coldfustion 3 years ago
orson wells goes to take a dump in the woods. i love that cigar
003lusive 3 years ago
Orson Welles - fat man walking
JeffreyP506 3 years ago
4:07 cloning!? haha
DJLorenzen 3 years ago
1:15 Nice little example of unnecessary animal cruelty for the betterment of science. (Note the face of the rat as its little body tries to deal with the overwhelming wave of pain the good professor gives it for no apparent reason).
kpb96m 4 years ago 3
I think that was an orgasm.
nicogum 3 years ago
The advance of science is and aught to be unstoppable. Unless of course a Republican president is elected into power who bends to the religious right and hinders all advancement of science. (U.S)
kpb96m 4 years ago 2
0:50 I wrote a thesis on A. H. Nayfeh back when I was earning my masters. You can find his musings in the "RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY". (Translated from Prikladnaya Mekhanika, Vol. 24) 1969.
Multiple computational aspects of the numerical implementation are discussed.
Some good examples of propagation of an incident plane wave over a circular-type shoal are presented (based on Born approximation)
kpb96m 4 years ago
Transparent Floating Orson heads + Synthesizer = Great Cinema
pinpalsburnsy 4 years ago 17
Actually, the problems we face today are going to look like absolute child's play when we are faced with the inevitable problem of over population. That's going to be truly depressing.
utubeworms 4 years ago
not necessarly, people dont wanna have kids theese days, the population will grow older , die and it qill stable out by 2020
ngfrost 4 years ago
Realize that you might be talking about a small percentage of people that might not want to have kids based on a geographical location. I assume your in the US, but consider population shifts around the globe as well. (IE China with 1/3 of the worlds population.) Its hard to tell what will happen.
kcirtap01 3 years ago
i live in canada; in china 1/3 of the population is female; most of the men are growing old and alone; they will die; im telling you it will even out
ngfrost 3 years ago
Don't count on it. That figure is also way off - a large percentage of women are undocumented. Plus, women will migrate from North Korea, Mongolia and Central Asia - b/c that's where the money/security is gathering in Asia.
Unmarried male populations don't sit and wither, they fight for resources. A lot of women are going to go into prostitution. The rest of the world should keep its fingers crossed that China doesn't invite a war w/ the West or India to diffuse its excess testosterone.
crock703 3 years ago
groovey music after 7:00. Alvin is right, Industrialism is not the only way. We've tasted the apple and now we're hooked. We sold this way of life to a world with exponential population growth. Now what? See the movie Koyannisqatsi and you may understand.
trainluvr 4 years ago
Thanks for posting. This is still relevant.
lukensal 4 years ago 3
Two things are being conflated here: technological change, and social breakdown. Computers cause hippies, sexual perversion, and riots - that's the message. Your stress isn't caused by bad people screwing with the culture. It's caused by transistors. Don't like long-haired freaks, uneasy because of inflation? Solution: take a sledgehammer to your artificial heart or electric typewriter.
Pure tripe.
nextren 4 years ago 2
neo-luddite thinking, using technology as a scapegoat. Good post!
AEigner 4 years ago
2:15 - 2:23: Blow-up dolls for wives. We're doomed.
BEST PART OF MOVIE: 3:37 - 4:10.
nextren 4 years ago 3
Maybe yes, SpikeWolfwood. Remember Chernobyl episode, 20 years back.
webdemarcio 4 years ago
Say no to certain technologies? Morons. They were so overwhelmed by their fears of all the new things happening around them that they failed to realize that hindering technology is hindering knowledge. Just about all technology is a double edged sword in that almost every advancement made by mankind has both good and bad applications. Should we abandon everything that can potentially be used for evil even if it would mean wonderful benefits for society?
SpikeWolfwood 4 years ago
Toffler doesn't advocate rejecting all technology. We need to be informed and active to reject technology that threatens our health, safety, and long-term survival.
lukensal 4 years ago 2
In his latest book "revolutionary wealth" he goes into more detail about the benefits of what he calls the "information age" or information economy. He also addresses the subject in that he wants people to be informed.
upcycle 4 years ago 2