@Licmycat It's exactly how they are. It's the law of the Universe. Positive chases Negative. Negative always leads and creates order. Positive always trails behind and collapses the order.
@TheRealVerbz2 That's the reason crooks fall in their lies, isn't it? Always....sooner or later It's amazing how I'm beginning to understand science! :)
@TheRealVerbz2 That's the reason crooks fall in their lies, isn't it? Always....sooner or later It's amazing how I'm beginning to understand science! :)
@TheRealVerbz2 That's the reason crooks fall in their lies, isn't it? Always....sooner or later It's amazing how I'm beginning to understand science! :)
It should be relatively easy to verify this model. I suppose astronomers have no problem issuing distances to earth for sun and planets, for every day over a decade back. A relatively simple computer program should be able to make a visual reprentation of the solar system with the sun as static point. With the earth as centre, it's all a mess, everyone agrees there.
@cloxxki They have to change their entire model of "gravity", the "atom", and a lot more. All their computer models were programmed by people with misconceptions about pulling forces. There is no pull or attract. Only Push.
Electricity is all pushing forces. The inward thrust of electricity is misinterpreted as pull.
There are no spherical pulling forces.
There is no nucleus to an "atom" (magnet). There is no nucleus to a vortex. And a magnet is 2 converging vortexes. They are a mess!
@TheRealVerbz2 Well, when a simple model is devised in my proposed way, they'll have to listen to the person who first suggested this. It's quite fundamental to fail to notice that the sun is always on on end of the system. Like building maps presuming the earth is flat.
I agree that models on micro scale are mostly guesswork which sortof works out in math.
@Cloxxki They think the Sun's mass has some magical pulling force that attracts the planets to it, yet the planets maintain an orbit around that stationary sun.
It's absurd.
And their model of the atom isn't any different. Neils Bohr NEVER observed the so called parts to the "atom" as he drew in his cartoon models. That precious scientific method was never used.
The measurements they take are accurate. Then they make up equations to describe WHY they are able to take their measurements.
@TheRealVerbz2 Nice to see you're so passionate about this. When and if this model were verified in the simple manner I proposed, the big shot scientist may explain why we weren't toasted billions of years ago. Then they'll have to come up with somethig that works in the model they know to be true.
SERIOUSLY, how hard is it to make a 3D plot of planets relative to the sun, based on their moment-by-moment location relative to earth? Can's soms university get on top of this, just to disprove this?
@Cloxxki Those Universities are money hoarding institutions that turn people into mindless debt slaves. They won't touch this information because we have a school system. Not an education system. If the info you want to present isn't in their current format, then they don't have time for what they label "pseudoscience". They "know" too much already. Their cup runeth over.
Look into the info in the video description.
DB Larson and Walter Russell tried to offer this almost 100 years ago.
@TheRealVerbz2 I realize how most uni's work. It could be one student's assignment to do in a 2-week period though. If the data is available, and it should be, the software should be really quite simple to program. Someone with computer skills could do this and get the Nobel prize, even if other came up with the model first.
@TheRealVerbz2 I don't want to be mentioned in the same context as Barack Obama. Not for the million they in fact give you for the questionnable honor. But when I start pushing a concept, often times other eventually realize it. Some things are now for sale partly because I bugged the world about it for years. Getting to a goal such as a verification of such a model, even starting with a hypothesis and unbiased program, requires communication. Get an astronomy nerd into a good bet for it!
@Cloxxki It's up to us to create those computer models. That's why I've been working for 6 years trying to articulate these concepts. This model of the solar system is just 1 of 20 things.
All of them are just as revolutionary and mind-melting.
It's up to US to make those computer models and just act like everyone already knows it. Show how foolish they are. "What? You Still believe the planets orbit the Sun? omG.. do you still believe the Earth is flat too? haha"
@Cloxxki So in order to show the Occam's Razor of the solar system they have to drop over 100 years of bogus equations. Which means their 1 sided coins, black holes, subatomic particles, nuclear theory, chemistry and branches of Psyence would be affected by that. And all those "experts" would lose their book sales and credibility.
In order to make the computer model you want, you have to address the misconceptions of their current computer programs and *theories*.
This is how Bees communicate the location of flowers from the source (hive).
A scout will fly out and find the location of pollen fields or a "plot."
That scout will find its way back to the hive where it communicates to the other bees by doing a little dance. This is to communicate the X, Y and Z coordinates of the flowers from the point of origin (hive).
The bees follow the coordinates and find the flowers, then follow the inverse coordinates to get back.
Do you think that while our planets are following in the wake of our sun (Or simply orbiting by traditional views.); do you think that our sun is following/orbiting a larger star?
Or even our Milky Way?
I don't mean the 'black hole in the center' concept... But I mean something outside our area.
Had a mushroom experience that showed me "All of Reality" comes from a Sun thing, we are emanations of it/Reflections of It. It got me wondering on how many levels following/orbiting functions on...
@learrus Absolutely. It's called the Planetary Serpent, the Solar Serpent, Galactic Serpent, etc. Different scales of the same dynamic.
We follow the helical wake of the Sun.
Our Sun follows the helical wake of Polaris.
Polaris follows the helical wake of Alcyon and so on.
Our Galaxy as a whole is moving relative to all the other surrounding galaxies which give the false impression of stillness on a macro scale. We are all moving in a vortex motion throughout the cosmos on every scale.
This makes sense, and if Polaris is that star it makes more sense why man is so interested in that particular star...
Another mushroom trip I had looking up into the sky, I developed a sort of depth perception of the stars; and could see how they and the planets are the gear and cog works of Reality; like a giant clock; but the clock Itself is aware... A living machine.
Thanks for posting these videos and the clear explanations of what would otherwise be very complex topics.
...it really is...science has problems with more than 3 moving bodies in space....all of the movement you describe declares modern SCIENCE with their ignorant mathematicians/physicists following in the wake of a rather pathetic dogma is lost in space....
scientists do not believe in religion, but the FACT is those ignorant twats belong to a religion of a different stripe.
@islandbuoy4 There's a difference between Science (Nature's Law and using Logic) verses Psyence (Man's illusions of observation which become a tradition of ignorance. ad hoc assumptions, or made up concepts based on No observations at all! A corporate backed and sense based indoctrination system to turn kids into button pushers and mindless regurgitators)
These people are pseudo-skeptics.
All it takes to become a genius is to surround one's self with fools. Better to be a wise man who has logic.
You are preaching to a sage dude....I have been preaching 'Z-axis' asymmetry for years to the catcalls of the indoctrinated herds of sheeple. Are you familiar with Marko Rodin and his entire idea of VBM based on the '2 and 5', what he calls the cosmic blender.
Write the number 2 on a piece of paper.
Hold it up to a mirror ... what do you see in the mirror Alice as you travel into the 'z' axis of the mirror?
@islandbuoy4 I know Marko personally and his son. I've also met Jamie Buturff and Randy Powell. We're in communication. I gave Marko and Randy copies of Professor John Searl's first sets of his Law of Squares books so they can see how it relates to VBM.
You can duplicate the 2 transforming into a 5 by looking at the 2 through a crystal or glass ball. And then an additional half ball (hemisphere). There sphere turns the image upside down. And the hemisphere flips it backwards.
If you thought Marko was a 2/5 sage of his age, you are about to meet another one.
go to this link...of course some of it you will recognize, but I am not sure if Marko knows he his VBM has solved a miracle! (fix the breaks in the url)
Wow, thats pretty much like men are when they go after a woman, isn't it?
Licmycat 2 weeks ago
@Licmycat It's exactly how they are. It's the law of the Universe. Positive chases Negative. Negative always leads and creates order. Positive always trails behind and collapses the order.
Can't have one without the other.
TheRealVerbz2 2 weeks ago
How can they say we see in straight lines when really we see bit by bit and more in circular motion?
Licmycat 2 weeks ago
@Licmycat EXACTLY!
All measurements are based from a rotating frame of reference.
There's no such thing as a straight line in reality.
All direction is curved and all motion is spiral.
NASA = Never A Straight Answer.... Neanderthals Attempting Space Acrobatics.
They need to convince the investors of juuuussst enough to get more funding.
When it's going to be pulled.."oh wait.. we just found a new planet. Can't show you a pic, but here's a cartoon!"
It's pathetic. And OUR tax dollars!
TheRealVerbz2 2 weeks ago
@TheRealVerbz2 That's the reason crooks fall in their lies, isn't it? Always....sooner or later It's amazing how I'm beginning to understand science! :)
Licmycat 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheRealVerbz2 That's the reason crooks fall in their lies, isn't it? Always....sooner or later It's amazing how I'm beginning to understand science! :)
Licmycat 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheRealVerbz2 That's the reason crooks fall in their lies, isn't it? Always....sooner or later It's amazing how I'm beginning to understand science! :)
Licmycat 2 weeks ago
It should be relatively easy to verify this model. I suppose astronomers have no problem issuing distances to earth for sun and planets, for every day over a decade back. A relatively simple computer program should be able to make a visual reprentation of the solar system with the sun as static point. With the earth as centre, it's all a mess, everyone agrees there.
Cloxxki 1 month ago
@cloxxki They have to change their entire model of "gravity", the "atom", and a lot more. All their computer models were programmed by people with misconceptions about pulling forces. There is no pull or attract. Only Push.
Electricity is all pushing forces. The inward thrust of electricity is misinterpreted as pull.
There are no spherical pulling forces.
There is no nucleus to an "atom" (magnet). There is no nucleus to a vortex. And a magnet is 2 converging vortexes. They are a mess!
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz2 Well, when a simple model is devised in my proposed way, they'll have to listen to the person who first suggested this. It's quite fundamental to fail to notice that the sun is always on on end of the system. Like building maps presuming the earth is flat.
I agree that models on micro scale are mostly guesswork which sortof works out in math.
Cloxxki 1 month ago
@Cloxxki They think the Sun's mass has some magical pulling force that attracts the planets to it, yet the planets maintain an orbit around that stationary sun.
It's absurd.
And their model of the atom isn't any different. Neils Bohr NEVER observed the so called parts to the "atom" as he drew in his cartoon models. That precious scientific method was never used.
The measurements they take are accurate. Then they make up equations to describe WHY they are able to take their measurements.
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz2 Nice to see you're so passionate about this. When and if this model were verified in the simple manner I proposed, the big shot scientist may explain why we weren't toasted billions of years ago. Then they'll have to come up with somethig that works in the model they know to be true.
SERIOUSLY, how hard is it to make a 3D plot of planets relative to the sun, based on their moment-by-moment location relative to earth? Can's soms university get on top of this, just to disprove this?
Cloxxki 1 month ago
@Cloxxki Those Universities are money hoarding institutions that turn people into mindless debt slaves. They won't touch this information because we have a school system. Not an education system. If the info you want to present isn't in their current format, then they don't have time for what they label "pseudoscience". They "know" too much already. Their cup runeth over.
Look into the info in the video description.
DB Larson and Walter Russell tried to offer this almost 100 years ago.
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz2 I realize how most uni's work. It could be one student's assignment to do in a 2-week period though. If the data is available, and it should be, the software should be really quite simple to program. Someone with computer skills could do this and get the Nobel prize, even if other came up with the model first.
Cloxxki 1 month ago
@Cloxxki I want to see YOU get that Nobel Prize!
Because you were the only one who had the technical skill to create it and had the mentality to comprehend it.
I have the mentality, but not the graphic skill.
We need all the help we can get.
This is OUR project.
:o)
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz2 I don't want to be mentioned in the same context as Barack Obama. Not for the million they in fact give you for the questionnable honor. But when I start pushing a concept, often times other eventually realize it. Some things are now for sale partly because I bugged the world about it for years. Getting to a goal such as a verification of such a model, even starting with a hypothesis and unbiased program, requires communication. Get an astronomy nerd into a good bet for it!
Cloxxki 1 month ago
@Cloxxki It's up to us to create those computer models. That's why I've been working for 6 years trying to articulate these concepts. This model of the solar system is just 1 of 20 things.
All of them are just as revolutionary and mind-melting.
It's up to US to make those computer models and just act like everyone already knows it. Show how foolish they are. "What? You Still believe the planets orbit the Sun? omG.. do you still believe the Earth is flat too? haha"
Surpass the "experts."
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
@Cloxxki So in order to show the Occam's Razor of the solar system they have to drop over 100 years of bogus equations. Which means their 1 sided coins, black holes, subatomic particles, nuclear theory, chemistry and branches of Psyence would be affected by that. And all those "experts" would lose their book sales and credibility.
In order to make the computer model you want, you have to address the misconceptions of their current computer programs and *theories*.
Easier said than done.
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
what would those waves sound like in audio freq.?
cjl85uk 1 month ago
@cjl85uk Jupter Sounds: watch?v=e3fqE01YYWs
Saturn Sounds: watch?v=LswSW60Zd4g
Uranus Sounds: watch?v=80Ngl2RY8sA
Neptune Sounds: watch?v=rwnpXll_A_E
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
The planets would only move in helixal motion you describe only if, as you assume, the sun moves at a 90 degree angle from the planets orbits.
FizzTimelord 1 month ago
The planets would move in the helixal motion as you show if, a
FizzTimelord 1 month ago
Also noteworthy to mention:
This is how Bees communicate the location of flowers from the source (hive).
A scout will fly out and find the location of pollen fields or a "plot."
That scout will find its way back to the hive where it communicates to the other bees by doing a little dance. This is to communicate the X, Y and Z coordinates of the flowers from the point of origin (hive).
The bees follow the coordinates and find the flowers, then follow the inverse coordinates to get back.
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago 3
Do you think that while our planets are following in the wake of our sun (Or simply orbiting by traditional views.); do you think that our sun is following/orbiting a larger star?
Or even our Milky Way?
I don't mean the 'black hole in the center' concept... But I mean something outside our area.
Had a mushroom experience that showed me "All of Reality" comes from a Sun thing, we are emanations of it/Reflections of It. It got me wondering on how many levels following/orbiting functions on...
learrus 1 month ago
@learrus Absolutely. It's called the Planetary Serpent, the Solar Serpent, Galactic Serpent, etc. Different scales of the same dynamic.
We follow the helical wake of the Sun.
Our Sun follows the helical wake of Polaris.
Polaris follows the helical wake of Alcyon and so on.
Our Galaxy as a whole is moving relative to all the other surrounding galaxies which give the false impression of stillness on a macro scale. We are all moving in a vortex motion throughout the cosmos on every scale.
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz2
This makes sense, and if Polaris is that star it makes more sense why man is so interested in that particular star...
Another mushroom trip I had looking up into the sky, I developed a sort of depth perception of the stars; and could see how they and the planets are the gear and cog works of Reality; like a giant clock; but the clock Itself is aware... A living machine.
Thanks for posting these videos and the clear explanations of what would otherwise be very complex topics.
learrus 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz2
...and that is why SCIENCE is a BIG JOKE!
...it really is...science has problems with more than 3 moving bodies in space....all of the movement you describe declares modern SCIENCE with their ignorant mathematicians/physicists following in the wake of a rather pathetic dogma is lost in space....
scientists do not believe in religion, but the FACT is those ignorant twats belong to a religion of a different stripe.
islandbuoy4 1 month ago 3
@islandbuoy4 There's a difference between Science (Nature's Law and using Logic) verses Psyence (Man's illusions of observation which become a tradition of ignorance. ad hoc assumptions, or made up concepts based on No observations at all! A corporate backed and sense based indoctrination system to turn kids into button pushers and mindless regurgitators)
These people are pseudo-skeptics.
All it takes to become a genius is to surround one's self with fools. Better to be a wise man who has logic.
TheRealVerbz 1 month ago
@TheRealVerbz
You are preaching to a sage dude....I have been preaching 'Z-axis' asymmetry for years to the catcalls of the indoctrinated herds of sheeple. Are you familiar with Marko Rodin and his entire idea of VBM based on the '2 and 5', what he calls the cosmic blender.
Write the number 2 on a piece of paper.
Hold it up to a mirror ... what do you see in the mirror Alice as you travel into the 'z' axis of the mirror?
Yup the 2 >>> becomes a 5.
*wink*
namaste
islandbuoy4 1 month ago
@islandbuoy4 I know Marko personally and his son. I've also met Jamie Buturff and Randy Powell. We're in communication. I gave Marko and Randy copies of Professor John Searl's first sets of his Law of Squares books so they can see how it relates to VBM.
You can duplicate the 2 transforming into a 5 by looking at the 2 through a crystal or glass ball. And then an additional half ball (hemisphere). There sphere turns the image upside down. And the hemisphere flips it backwards.
;o)
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheRealVerbz2
If you thought Marko was a 2/5 sage of his age, you are about to meet another one.
go to this link...of course some of it you will recognize, but I am not sure if Marko knows he his VBM has solved a miracle! (fix the breaks in the url)
ht tp: //kachina2012.wordpress. com/2010/06/22/how-to-feed-5000-people-using-5-loaves-of-bread-and-2-fish/
islandbuoy4 4 weeks ago
yes sir!
TheNewCropView 1 month ago in playlist Jason Verbelli's Work
nice vid!
Friedfisch007 1 month ago
Great Jason. Thx for all these vids. Helps me understand more and more of our reality.
MrLiamx 1 month ago 2
Hey Jason, did you get my personal message? YT have 'glitches' sometimes. Even y/n answer will be ok. Thank you. :]
oxiigen 1 month ago
@oxiigen Just replied. :o)
TheRealVerbz2 1 month ago
love what you wrote about it in FB!!!
iamours 1 month ago 2