Guns and Greenhouse Gases: Part II

[QuartuvLarry]

You'd think the lefticles would be HAPPY that the world is not constantly ending tomorrow

[hitballfootler]

What do those positive effects on plants matter if the negative consequences would be catastrophic.

[UTubekookdetector]

Huh? I have no idea what you're talking about. If you're referring to CO2 levels on plants they are responding positively and it's not killing the planet.

Sounds like you're delving into conjecture again.

[hitballfootler]

A lot of scientists say that GW is a problem and I've seen evidence that debunks the alternative theories for why the earth is warming such as solar activity. My point is that if it has many negative consequences come from GW what is the point of ignoring them just because it has some positive effetcs.

[UTubekookdetector]

A lot of scientists don't buy what you're selling either, so what's your point?

You're using an assumption to "prove" your point.

[hitballfootler]

Okay. Let's forget about the question of whether GW is real or not. If it is real and it will have many catastrophic consequences then what does it matter if it will help a few plants at the expense of destroying many other things and causing many problems?

[UTubekookdetector]

I believe GW is real, but not that it's anthropogenic. Actually plants sequester much of this CO2.

You're still engaging in a lot of conjecture.

[hitballfootler]

Okay but just assume that anthropogenic warming is true since that isn't what the argument is about. If it is true then we can't just forget about the negative consequences because it will help some plants. That is my point.