Governor Johnson: My Neighbor's Dogs Have Created More Jobs Than Obama

[givemearandomnamenow]

I like him. I like him a lot. 2nd to Ron Paul, my favorite politician.

[mookielovesgod]

#GaryJohnson2012 GO GARY! snubbed by republicans now running #libertarian yay! plz give him your support Gary Johnson 2012 .com

[Da1RiSiN1sMoKe]

I'm glad I finally found another republican candidate (or at least would-be) I can agree with.

[Hdtexan]

What a sack of shit these teatards are.

[absoluteanatomy1]

@Hdtexan thats not the tea party, thats just some republicans..dumbass

[lushfauna]

Don't give up Gary everyone luvs ya

[Redeye1524]

Paul Johnson 2012

[nijikazegirl]

That was great. Made the point flawlessly

[Ddstairclimber]

johnson ended obama's reelection campaign right there

[504Anon]

It really doesn't matter how many jobs Obama's administration "creates" when the unemployment rate is the 2nd lowest it's ever been in recorded history! Since Obama took office, unemployment skyrocketed up to 10%! I cannot post links but if you type "unemployment rate" into Google, the first result is a pretty graph.

Mathematically, dogs win hands down, because pet care requires job creation, Obama's administration kills them.

[504Anon]

1. My neighbors dogs requires dog food which is a $19.53 billion dollar industry that employs over 103,000 Americans (US Department of Commerce.)

If you include the entire pet care industry into the equation, which encompasses visits to the vet, medicine, supplies & toys, you have a $50.84 Billion-dollar industry (APPA.)

[banquojr]

from the way all those clowns were clapping i wouldve guessed they had just heard a joke for the very first time

[fayax]

Political jokes dont get better than this!

[abola2121]

@SuperFluffyMuffinBag "I'll get you Johnson, if it's the last thing I do!"

[ericadamrice]

Paul and Johnson are the only to fighting for freedom in this election I'm just glad we still have a diverse population that wants to restore America we small now but were growing by the day.



[capitandelfuego]

0:12 only white people at GOP debates

[ilazernerd]

@capitandelfuego Sorry if this bunch happens to be more intelligent than your group.

[capitandelfuego]

@ilazernerd Its obvious that they're not more intelligent because they're supporting a bunch of retarded homophobic corrupt white nationalist who want to turn America into Somalia.

[ilazernerd]

@capitandelfuego Believe what you want. I can name just as many reasons your party sucks and blah blah blah.

[capitandelfuego]

@ilazernerd So the fact that my party wants to give you clean air and water with EPA, and the fact that my party wants to help and take care of your parents and grandparents throughout their life of handicap and old age with MediCare, and the fact that my party wants to educate your children so they have the freedom to choose between becoming a scientist and a Mcdonalds employee, and the fact that my party wants to conserve national parks, landmarks, and the bald eagle makes them suck? Dumbass

[JCGrantatAC]

@capitandelfuego No, what sucks is that your party doesn't do those things well and it uses our money to do them.  The EPA protects sand fleas from factories that could employ thousands of workers, Social Security provides a negative rate of return for most retirees, public education places union bosses ahead of children, science has been corrupted by math deniers who promote the global warming hoax for grant money, and national parks are preserved by definition. Get a real education, son.

[capitandelfuego]

@JCGrantatAC completely delusional and have just been brainwashed by Fox News. None of what you said is fact or can be supported by evidence. And how are Scientist math deniers? Do you even know how hard it is to get something accepted into the science community? It takes almost a decade or more for research to be acceptable for publish. How are national parks reserved by definition? Without the EPA they would be drilling in Yellowstone NP just as sand fleas. Dumbass alert didn't go to college

[kaysandesses]

@JCGrantatAC "science has been corrupted by math deniers who promote the global warming hoax for grant money"

Provide some proof of that assertion. By proof I mean evidence that would pass scientific scrutiny.

This will be interesting.

[JCGrantatAC]

@kaysandesses I'll spoonfeed it to you while giving you an opportunity to actually think for yourself. Download all of the surface temperature data at NASA's website. Now, run a Pearson's correlaton study for every major city in the world. You won't find a single sample where there is a statistically signficant correlation between time and temperature; hence, the need for you flat earthers to contrive an "average." Every 30 years you math deniers pop up. Get a basic education.

[kaysandesses]

@JCGrantatAC "By proof I mean evidence that would pass scientific scrutiny."

I'll spoonfeed that to you: It means peer-reviewed scientific research. BTW, rambling about a giant conspiracy in the scientific community does not qualify as an answer.

"Get a basic education."

I hate to deflate your balloon, but I'll take the aggregate education of the members of the National Academy of Sciences over whatever you're copying from a climate change denier website.

Try again if you wish.

[JCGrantatAC]

@kaysandesses If you had a basic education, you could easily do the work yourself. These flat earther math deniers are the same degenerate ilk who were taking billions in grant money in the '70s while getting hysterical about global cooling. And, they rely on sheep like you to grow their climate change lie every 30 years. There's no statistically significant correlation between time and temperature anywhere on earth. Go back to high school stats class kid.

[kaysandesses]

@JCGrantatAC You *might* be competent at math but your reading comprehension skills are obviously lacking. Or... you're simply dodging the issue because you know your point is the losing one, i.e. you're unable to provide scientifically sound proof of a scientific conspiracy, or that the global body of scientific research on the issue of global climate change is in error.

Polish up your tin-foil hat son, the conspiro rays are leaking through.

[JCGrantatAC]

@kaysandesses Are you kidding little fella? Even your favorite unauthoratative source, Wikipedia, has a "hockey stick controversy" submission with about 150 footnotes. And, it doesn't even mention half of the renowned physicists and mathematicians who laugh at and mock how the climatologist community calculated the world's "average" temperature. William Happer, PhD in physics from Princeton and a member of the National Academy of Sciences has written at length about the entire fraud.

[JCGrantatAC]

@kaysandesses Among other things, Princeton physicist William Happer, PhD says: “This is George Orwell. This is the ‘Germans are the master race. The Jews are the scum of the earth.’ It’s that kind of propaganda, ... Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Every time you exhale, you exhale air that has 4 percent carbon dioxide. To say that that’s a pollutant just boggles my mind. What used to be science has turned into a cult.”

[kaysandesses]

@JCGrantatAC Wow! So you honestly think that the opinion of one scientist (whose expertise is not in climate science) outweighs the research and expertise of thousands of scientists worldwide on this issue? You *might* know a lot about math but it's apparent your knowledge of how scientific research is conducted and how the information gleaned from that research is disseminated, wouldn't fill a thimble.  Among other things, Happer's statement is not "science".

[JCGrantatAC]

@kaysandesses Climate change theory doesn't even follow the Baconian method from the 16h century. What's more, keeping original data on scraps of paper in some nutjob's office, and then losing them, doesn't meet elementary school standards of science. That's why the loser contemplated killing himself. You're right about one thing, though: Dr. Happer's statement isn't science. It's a statement by a renowned physicist about barely educated climatologists and left-wing loons propagating a hoax.

[JCGrantatAC]

@capitandelfuego To be specific, they're white people who don't want to live off the public dole.

[capitandelfuego]

@JCGrantatAC So you're saying only white people don't want to live off the public dole? Because I don't see any blacks or hispanics there, and there are plenty of them who don't want to live off the public dole. In addition, why does getting an education, health care, child care, food, and water have to be a public dole? It should be a birth right according to the constitution, since everyone is suppose to be born equal. But, allas, retards like you would rather see whites dominate

[JCGrantatAC]

@capitandelfuego You might want to enroll in a reading comprehension class at your local community college. Let me go slow and spoonfeed this to you so that you can understand it. You said that there are only white people at GOP debates. In responding to your racist comment, I wrote that they are white people who don't want to live off the public dole: any implications from there are all yours. Finally, here's a basic primer on the U.S. Constitution: it doesn't guarantee any of those things.

[JCGrantatAC]

@capitandelfuego Parenthetically, you've confused the Declaration of Independence with the U.S. Constitution. The former was never an operative document. Plus, like the Constitution, men meant "free men." When the Constitution was ratified, blacks were treated as 3/5ths of a person under Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3. That didn't change until ratification of the 13th and 14th Amendments. Did you even go to school, son?

[JCGrantatAC]

*Those who were enslaved.

[aSingleDallasGuy]

The sad part of this is that it is true! Obama has a net loss of 2.4 million jobs since they day he was sworn in. Obama should hire those dogs as his labor secretaries!

[kaysandesses]

@aSingleDallasGuy Bush lost 2.6 million jobs the last year he was in office.  In other words, Bushie Boy lost more jobs in one year than Obama has in 2 1/2. hmm

[aSingleDallasGuy]

@kaysandesses .... LOL, are you kidding me? This is your defense of Obama. That ONLY 2.4 million jobs was lost on his watch? This is priceless! You should request Obama use this for his re-election slogan. How About; "Obama! I Suck a little less than the last guy!"... LOL Keep clinging to that hope and change! How's that working out? LOL

[kaysandesses]

@aSingleDallasGuy My point is that Obama has done better in the jobs category that the fucking idiot GWB.

Hope and change is actually working out fairly well: we've had a good start to comprehensive healthcare reform, the repeal of DADT (which was a fucking joke from the beginning), draw down of troops in Iraq, and improved economy, and a dramatically improved presence internationally. Of course there is more to be done, but it's a good start.

[aSingleDallasGuy]

@kaysandesses. Total left-wing BS! Bushs's worst day in office is far better than Obama's best day in office in regards to the economy. There are FAR more people unemployed today than Obama's first day in office. In fact 2.4 million more people do not have jobs than Bush's last day in office. The dept of Labor's website will explain this to you and even show pictures to help you understand. Your left-wing math doesn't work here. You are wrong. The war on terrorism is the same as Bush's idiot!

[JCGrantatAC]

@kaysandesses Let me do some more basic math for you, little fella. The average monthly unemployment rate during the eight years of President George W. Bush was 5.2%--that's nearly full employment under modern economic theory. Under Barack Hapless Obama, the average monthly unemployment rate is 9.3%. Do you know why? It's b/c there has been a net loss of 2.4 million jobs since this inexperienced, intellectual midget became President. In my town, his resume wouldn't qualify him for mayor.

[SeppLainer]

@JCGrantatAC

Right on....

But Bush wasn't exactly all lollipops and rainbows...

And it doesn't matter if unemployment is less than 1%, if all the employees are working service economy jobs....

Ie: Perry's numbers in Taxus

[tobewunaskwunaaron]

Brilliant, just brilliant!

[AmericaneAce]

ok guys it was a good joke, but thats no reason to vote for him ya?

[lushfauna]

well it's nice to see libertarians rising If Ron Paul can't get their maybe he can someday- He likable and seems honest too

[TheExecutiveDecision]

Stolen line from Rush Limbaugh earlier that morning. He could have at least said, "As rush said today...." kinda shitty to steal rush's line without giving him credit!

[tindremene]

@TheExecutiveDecision

he didn't steal it from limbaugh. he got it from a radio show host in new mexico that took suggestions from listeners.

[TheExecutiveDecision]

@tindremene No, I was listening live to Rush when he made that statement. Rush said "his" dogs have created more shovel ready work than Obama. So anyone who said it after that, in new mexico or in florida, owes Rush some credit. And regardless of who he stole it from, Johnson didn't make it up, so he shouldn't stand there with a shit eating grin, like he is the richard prior of the republican party.

[truthforamerica]

That was awesome!!!!!!!!!

[ourwallaceclan]

Maybe his neighbor is Rush?

[CollectiveCheckup]

Paul/Johnson 2012

[CasperCee]

That is a true statement. Of course, this statement was originally made by Rush Limbaugh the day earlier.

[Fullmetalpizza]

@kqcrazii Hopefully Gary will drop out soon and endorse Paul.

[kqcrazii]

This guy gets to get out of the race! He's gonna split off votes from Ron Paul and neither of them is going to win!

[Madfoot713]

@kqcrazii no he won't, having two libertarians is a very good thing

[kqcrazii]

@Madfoot713 You only got one vote. You can't vote for both Ron Paul and Gary Johnson. Inevitably, some Republican primary voters will pick and choose between the two and ultimately, the libertarian vote will be split between both candidates. The mainstream vote will go to either Romney or Perry. I mean sure, having two ideological candidates seems good, but the votes have to be centralized in one candidate if they want a chance of winning.

[Madfoot713]

@kqcrazii it's still very early in the primary season and neither of them have overwhelming support. having TWO libertarians running makes our views look more credible.

[Kibikayuki]

@kqcrazii Neither have a chance against Obama, so they should both get out of the race. The one we should be voting for is the guy whom actually has experience in creating jobs, which Ron Paul has zero experience in. Ron Paul is also too liberal so he'd lose the conservative vote (which is a good amount of votes in itself). He has zero knowledge and experience on foreign policy and is completely naive about it, if you ask me.

[kqcrazii]

@Kibikayuki Ron Paul is liberal? Since when is cutting corporate tax rates and abolishing the EPA, Department of Education, CIA, Fed, and DHS liberal? God, you should be a stand-up comedian.

[davefrmca]

One politician has it right...

[nbarile18]

Fox put Gary Johnson in there to split the vote with Ron Paul to marginalize them both. We must get behind Ron Paul and get him the nomination, thus allowing him to pick Johnson as VP.

One of them MUST get elected. But Ron Paul has the seniority, and to be perfectly honest, the deciding factor is that he's pro-life (even if this is a small nick to liberty, as a Christian I am willing to tolerate it). Vote Ron Paul, and Ron Paul, pick Gary Johnson for VP!

[DZMOST]

@nbarile18 Pro-life means NO abortions. Plus Dr. Paul believe that matter should be decided on by local or state governments.Dr. Paul is himself is a devout Christian but does not believe he has the right to force his ideology on others.

[abaseraserhead]

@nbarile18 I disagree. I think CNN's "objective criteria" in omitting Johnson was to leave Paul as the only candidate of his kind... thus marginalizing him further as an "outsider". If CNN had included Johnson in their debates, they would have had to acknowledge more libertarian issues, something they didn't want to do.

Fox has done the right thing here by including both Johnson and Paul in the debates; there is a much needed libertarian flavor that would be lacking if it was just one of them.

[ilazernerd]

Definitely the quote of the night!

[cpaulson07]

NObama 2012!!!

[thetoneranger1]

dogs do shit quite a lot hahah funny stuff

[badlands307]

Gary Johnson kicks ass. I dig him and Ron Paul. Herman Cain is pretty good too.

[GreysonatorFan621]

Gary Johnson actually has MORE experience than Obama and is a true Capitalistic loving candidate. He wants to give us the citizen more rights and not restrict them like fellow Republicans and Socialist Democrats have done. People hate others who have common sense ideas and that's why they hate Gary Johnson.

[sweatyshorts]

The f*** is this guy?

[Shnufkin]

how is that funny?

[sweatyshorts]

@Shnufkin Eh, you know, people like poop jokes. What can y'do?

[kowalsik]

@Shnufkin Because it's true.

[DerailAmnestydotcom]

He's right.

[2cOthers]

LOL one of the better one liners coming from the right wing spin tanks - He'll still be in the single digits with the other Santorum mix of T'Baggers

[BeachHouse4Rent]

You ^ know

[BeachHouse4Rent]

You blacks voted republican at about 90 percent until the early 1930s

[TheETCFiles]

A lot of white people there

[MacGirvan]

@TheETCFiles Thats true and allot of them would be glad to vote for a Cain/Rubio 2012 ticket. 

[endwelfare]

@TheETCFiles thats because blacks are not allowed to choose a political party. that have to be democrat otherwise they are uncle toms and race traitors

[kowalsik]

@endwelfare Wrong. They voted Democrat simply because the the candidate was black. Look at the polls, i'ts 100% true.

[endwelfare]

@kowalsik yes its true blacks vote for obama because he is black. but they always vote democrat no matter

[DerailAmnestydotcom]

@TheETCFiles Of course there are. The GOP is the party that is supposed to reduce taxes. You think that happened by accident?

[hbdywtk]

0:17 Center of screen, Rick Perry supporter.

[TheAmusingBunni]

You can say that again!



[LibertyMike1]

Did I actually see Rick Santorum smile?? Rick Santorum has a sense of humor??

[larryw33]

Best moment in the debate for sure. He's much, much more than one-liners however. Google Gary Johnson and learn more about participating in your freedom.

[WatchPolitician]

@hbdywtk I hate Rick Perry.

[TheComputerEngineer]

Gary Johnson for VP! Ron Paul 2012!!! :)

[NAGGERNUTZ]

I don't care where or who he got the line from. It was funny and it brought down the house. AND, it was true.

[stetsonwalker]

That line was CLASSIC i will tell you!

[jswizle93]

fourth comment yay!!!

[patriotsouthsound]

Plagiarized from Rush Limbaugh earlier today but still funny.

[warrenroche]

Fact is Gary Johnson stole this remark, which was made by Rush Limbaugh earlier today on his show. No doubt this will come out very soon! Perhaps Governor Johnson decided if he got caught using this remark even bad publicity would be better than no publicity at all!

[Madfoot713]

@warrenroche Fuck off, GJ problably doesn't even watch Rush Limbaugh.

[havlorech]

@Madfoot713 Yeah, you're probably right. One of Johnson's aides stole it and told him to say it at the debate.

[Madfoot713]

@havlorech Or maybe it wasn't stolen at all, since it's a pretty obvious joke

[warrenroche]

@Madfoot713 Is that right DOUCHE BAG? Here is a headline from today's USA Today: Sep 23, 2011

Johnson credits Limbaugh for GOP debate joke. If you are a Gary Johnson supporter he doesn't need any enemies!

[Madfoot713]

@warrenroche >"Johnson told HuffPo that Jim Villanucci, a former Tonight Show writer who hosts a radio show in Albuquerque, texted him a bunch of one-liners to use at the Orlando event. But Johnson said he didn't know Limbaugh had used the dog joke"

[hellsunicorn]

@warrenroche Wrong, he got it from a New Mexico talk radio show and it was one of many zingers offered up by supporters of his in New Mexico. The world doesn't revolve around Rush Limbaugh, didn't you get the memo?

[HardyMachia]

Best line of the night. Google: Gary Johnson 2012 and learn more.

[BlakeFalling]

@HardyMachia Are you fucking serious? Hes running basically to take votes away from Ron Paul.

[WatchPolitician]

@BlakeFalling He supports Ron Paul.

[WilliamRayWalters]

@BlakeFalling Or maybe he'll end up running 'with' Ron Paul.

[BlakeFalling]

@WilliamRayWalters Well if he even wants a chance of that happening he should start endorsing Dr. Paul NOW!

[WatchPolitician]

@HardyMachia Gary Johnson also supports Ron Paul.

[doncarlsanders]

There is some truth in that statement.