Wow I ma happy this all stimulated so much comment. I am reading Jeremy Rifkin's "The Third Industrial Revolution", where he ratifies what I initially discovered and published. He has brilliantly shown what is happening and is sourced because we are leaving the oil age behind us. I could care less who believes this or not, you want to be in the splendid future the denial has to stop. You tube is forever which I can love or hate. I love it.
The troposphere is cooling, the Pacific is cooling,the Atlantic is cooling,the Sun is entering a Grand Minimum. Abrupt COOLING is on the agenda for the Planet.
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
I would say the hucksters are right here, you commenters that opinionate your beliefs and show no data to support your assertions, 25% unemployment for the State? Get it right and show that data (with a link to the references). Make your own video as a response to the National Snow and Ice Data Centers 17 year data.
A huckster is someone who sells snake oil, or things with no underlying data to support outlandish claims. All of my data is based on scientific measurements spanning a 17 year period of ice pack density. It may be a stretch to say Greenland Ice cap is protected by the north poles ice shelf, it is also a stretch to say Greenland is not protected.
All these intelligent, sophisticated minds are telling you that you're video is ludicrous. However, if you're ingnorant enough to believe this ridiculous hoax, then you probably don't know what "ludicrous" means, so let me dumb it down for you... ludicrous = BULLSHIT
I am happy this is causing a furor and we are starting to see who you all are. I could care less for your opinions, if you want to comment how about some facts to back up your ludicrous claim.
All I did here is create a GIS animation from the original data. That data is a fact. I think I hit a nerve with people like yourself who like to discredit the author with no facts to back anything up. Be very careful what you write.
@watergroovin no, i KNOW it fake. i scanned the internet and on foxnews.com, i found articles on scientist who admitted that they manipulated ocean temperature data and other figure to make it seem like the earth was getting warmer. and btw, im freezing my ass off because we've had snow in alabama for a week.
i'd like to dedicate my new video to the memory of lisa beamers husband, who valiantly died crashing flight 93 into a hole which was already there, may he rest in pieces, where ever they may be.
wtc 7 - freefall
wtc 1 and 2 - molten steel in basements, evidence of thermite
flight 93 - no wreckage, hole in ground since 1994 where engine dug up.
flight 77 - pentagon photo and video footage clearly shows no plane before wall collapsed.
I challenge anyone to look at the source of this video where the data comes from (in the end credits). Argue with the University of Colorado instead your arguments are a complete set of red herrings. I like the debate but lets get real with sources, I did.
Ah, a global warming huckster. I should have known. You're typical - deny any facts that contradict your personal beliefs and believe anything that supports your personal beliefs, facts be damned. Here's a free clue, junior....the earth has warmed and cooled many times over its existence, long before there were people and SUV's. it will warm and cool long after humans are extinct. there is shit you can do about it, so go peddle your socialist policies somewhere else.
"As part of the NCST Act, no part of any report resulting from investigations can be admitted as evidence or used in any suit or action for damages. Additionally, NIST employees are not permitted to serve as expert witnesses."
signed into law on Oct. 1, 2002, by President Bush
as in: anything NIST concludes is inadmissible in a court of law and makes it as good as hearsay. So much for NIST's credentials.
Note the ice pack in Antarctica has increased greatly the last 50 years. The data from the ice cores clearly shows this is a normal cycle because when you superimpose the GISP and Vostok data most of the time as temp goes up in one hemisphere it goes down in the other and vice versa, been happening for 10,000s of years
I am wondering since you have this all figured out what part of the science convinces you man made global warming is a fact? The typical answer 99% of the time is well all scientists say it is true but for one this not true like RM Carter who is one of many that disagrees and has published an excellent paper in an easy to read format going through all the science and issues. Search for R M Carter paper entitled Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate. Note it says..
Lets be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus
There is no direct proof an increase of 100 ppm in CO2 has any effect on temp. Fact is an increase of 100 ppm CO2 has a no effect on temperature in the lab, none! You need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm to see a 3 degree C change. Global warming nuts then say, well the lab is not fair because CO2 is 50,000 feet of atmosphere. So there are some theories based on an idea of layers in 50,000 feet that tries to prove a 100ppm increase in CO2 increase temperature a few tenths of one degree F.
This is an insignificant increase much less proof of man made global warming so the global warming nuts say well CO2 has an amplifying effect and then they rely on flawed global warming models which are grossly positive lookback biased so of course they are going to show an amplifying effect from a small amount of CO2 as they are built to do this but note flawed models are not proof much less science.
Warmer temperatures do not mean the end of the world. If you take a look at the GISP (Greenland Ice Sheet Project) ice core the temp was 1 degree C higher 1000 years ago then the Anasazis Indians thrived in Americas southwest from 850 ad to 1250 ad as the southwest was much wetter and the Vikings were able to plant crops, then 2000 years ago it was 2 degree C higher where the roman empire was doing pretty good. Last it was 3 degree C higher 3300 years ago but this did not stop the Jewish exodus
Also note the world did not end, or flood and the polar bears survived all these warming periods as well. It is true in the last 800 years the northern hemisphere temperature has been relatively flat with an upward turn the last 100 years but the last 800 years have been the exception as the other 9000 years of records show 100s of temperature changes varying as much a 3 degrees C in a couple 100 years.
Note the data from the southern hemisphere (Vostok) shows something different as it shows 3 major temp changes by 2.5 degree C over the same last 800 years but for some reason the global warming folks ignore this never explaining how CO2 only effects the northern hemisphere. Note after 10,000 years the earth returns to an elliptical orbit where the temp drops 9 degrees C lasting for about 80,000 years.
Wow I ma happy this all stimulated so much comment. I am reading Jeremy Rifkin's "The Third Industrial Revolution", where he ratifies what I initially discovered and published. He has brilliantly shown what is happening and is sourced because we are leaving the oil age behind us. I could care less who believes this or not, you want to be in the splendid future the denial has to stop. You tube is forever which I can love or hate. I love it.
watergroovin 5 months ago
The troposphere is cooling, the Pacific is cooling,the Atlantic is cooling,the Sun is entering a Grand Minimum. Abrupt COOLING is on the agenda for the Planet.
david222444 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Tom Harris
ICSC
TomHarrisICSC 1 year ago
I would say the hucksters are right here, you commenters that opinionate your beliefs and show no data to support your assertions, 25% unemployment for the State? Get it right and show that data (with a link to the references). Make your own video as a response to the National Snow and Ice Data Centers 17 year data.
watergroovin 2 years ago
A huckster is someone who sells snake oil, or things with no underlying data to support outlandish claims. All of my data is based on scientific measurements spanning a 17 year period of ice pack density. It may be a stretch to say Greenland Ice cap is protected by the north poles ice shelf, it is also a stretch to say Greenland is not protected.
watergroovin 2 years ago
All these intelligent, sophisticated minds are telling you that you're video is ludicrous. However, if you're ingnorant enough to believe this ridiculous hoax, then you probably don't know what "ludicrous" means, so let me dumb it down for you... ludicrous = BULLSHIT
chocotaco9666 2 years ago
I am happy this is causing a furor and we are starting to see who you all are. I could care less for your opinions, if you want to comment how about some facts to back up your ludicrous claim.
All I did here is create a GIS animation from the original data. That data is a fact. I think I hit a nerve with people like yourself who like to discredit the author with no facts to back anything up. Be very careful what you write.
watergroovin 2 years ago
@watergroovin no, i KNOW it fake. i scanned the internet and on foxnews.com, i found articles on scientist who admitted that they manipulated ocean temperature data and other figure to make it seem like the earth was getting warmer. and btw, im freezing my ass off because we've had snow in alabama for a week.
chocotaco9666 1 year ago
Polar ice caps "protect" Greenland's ice.
Pretty ridiculous.
Look at a temperature contour map to see the current avg temps in Greenland & the pole.
How does the ice at the pole affect temps 100s-1,000s of miles away?
Regardless, no evidence that this is due to emissions.
Ice has come & gone long before humans.
More regs really hurt CA.
Unemployment here is 25% above national.
Cost of living is about 50% higher.
Scottit 2 years ago
Read the NIPCC report, get back to us.
newnoggin2 2 years ago
i'd like to dedicate my new video to the memory of lisa beamers husband, who valiantly died crashing flight 93 into a hole which was already there, may he rest in pieces, where ever they may be.
wtc 7 - freefall
wtc 1 and 2 - molten steel in basements, evidence of thermite
flight 93 - no wreckage, hole in ground since 1994 where engine dug up.
flight 77 - pentagon photo and video footage clearly shows no plane before wall collapsed.
9/11 - INSIDE JOB
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago
I challenge anyone to look at the source of this video where the data comes from (in the end credits). Argue with the University of Colorado instead your arguments are a complete set of red herrings. I like the debate but lets get real with sources, I did.
watergroovin 2 years ago
Ah, a global warming huckster. I should have known. You're typical - deny any facts that contradict your personal beliefs and believe anything that supports your personal beliefs, facts be damned. Here's a free clue, junior....the earth has warmed and cooled many times over its existence, long before there were people and SUV's. it will warm and cool long after humans are extinct. there is shit you can do about it, so go peddle your socialist policies somewhere else.
usamericanz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
quote right off of NIST's own web site.
"As part of the NCST Act, no part of any report resulting from investigations can be admitted as evidence or used in any suit or action for damages. Additionally, NIST employees are not permitted to serve as expert witnesses."
signed into law on Oct. 1, 2002, by President Bush
as in: anything NIST concludes is inadmissible in a court of law and makes it as good as hearsay. So much for NIST's credentials.
fbi and cia now hiring.
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago
What does that have to do with the global warming hoax?
usamericanz 2 years ago
Note the ice pack in Antarctica has increased greatly the last 50 years. The data from the ice cores clearly shows this is a normal cycle because when you superimpose the GISP and Vostok data most of the time as temp goes up in one hemisphere it goes down in the other and vice versa, been happening for 10,000s of years
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
I am wondering since you have this all figured out what part of the science convinces you man made global warming is a fact? The typical answer 99% of the time is well all scientists say it is true but for one this not true like RM Carter who is one of many that disagrees and has published an excellent paper in an easy to read format going through all the science and issues. Search for R M Carter paper entitled Myth of Dangerous Human-Caused Climate. Note it says..
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
Lets be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
There is no direct proof an increase of 100 ppm in CO2 has any effect on temp. Fact is an increase of 100 ppm CO2 has a no effect on temperature in the lab, none! You need to increase CO2 to about 200,000 ppm to see a 3 degree C change. Global warming nuts then say, well the lab is not fair because CO2 is 50,000 feet of atmosphere. So there are some theories based on an idea of layers in 50,000 feet that tries to prove a 100ppm increase in CO2 increase temperature a few tenths of one degree F.
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
True.
And before this CO2 increase of 100ppm in the last 150 years, the CO2 only varied by 100ppm (~180-280) & increased AFTER temps did.
Scottit 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an insignificant increase much less proof of man made global warming so the global warming nuts say well CO2 has an amplifying effect and then they rely on flawed global warming models which are grossly positive lookback biased so of course they are going to show an amplifying effect from a small amount of CO2 as they are built to do this but note flawed models are not proof much less science.
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Warmer temperatures do not mean the end of the world. If you take a look at the GISP (Greenland Ice Sheet Project) ice core the temp was 1 degree C higher 1000 years ago then the Anasazis Indians thrived in Americas southwest from 850 ad to 1250 ad as the southwest was much wetter and the Vikings were able to plant crops, then 2000 years ago it was 2 degree C higher where the roman empire was doing pretty good. Last it was 3 degree C higher 3300 years ago but this did not stop the Jewish exodus
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
Also note the world did not end, or flood and the polar bears survived all these warming periods as well. It is true in the last 800 years the northern hemisphere temperature has been relatively flat with an upward turn the last 100 years but the last 800 years have been the exception as the other 9000 years of records show 100s of temperature changes varying as much a 3 degrees C in a couple 100 years.
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago
Note the data from the southern hemisphere (Vostok) shows something different as it shows 3 major temp changes by 2.5 degree C over the same last 800 years but for some reason the global warming folks ignore this never explaining how CO2 only effects the northern hemisphere. Note after 10,000 years the earth returns to an elliptical orbit where the temp drops 9 degrees C lasting for about 80,000 years.
MissingGWdotcom 2 years ago