Added: 4 years ago
From: TheGaryNull
Views: 22,231
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (760)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They've been killing everybody by use of our trust in the system.

  • Haha. Clark Baker couldn't win an egg and spoon race let alone a court case. The OSMJ or whatever its called is just a massive joke.

  • @jonnyneviripine Lol...idiot....Clark Baker is a licensed PI who qualifies to give evidence based opinions in courts of law. IF he were caught publicly lying about anything he would lose his license. The cases he's involved in don't make it to court. As soon as DAs know they're going to have to prove those tests are scientifically valid they drop the "hiv" criminal charges.

  • Sadly Clark baker makes a hell of a noise but no lawyer ever returns his calls. Remind me why he was sacked for the LAPD ? How the fuck did he ever get into bed with Crowe and Duesberg ? Presumably someone has long pockets and very poor judement.

  • @jonnyneviripine Lol....HOW would YOU know who returns Clark Baker's calls? Also..."Dr" Jeanne over at the Ministry of Aidstruth only copy pasted HALF of his bio. To read about his being cleared of all charges go read the other half on his blog. "Dr" jeanne and the psuedo scientists over at the Ministry of Aidstruth are the ones with "deep pockets" They are funded by the companies whose products they promote

    google....THE AIDSTRUTH RATS SCATTER

  • @jonnyneviripine If you want to know how Clark Baker got involved google.....GALLO'S EGG

  • Clark Baker. A complete joke.

    Quote mining, cherry picking its all the same stuff. Favourite topic of denialists.

    So how many people in the USA have sued a person / company / organisation for medical negligence by arguing HIV tests don't actually test for the virus? And you can leave out any mention of Clark Baker and his ludicrious fantasies.

  • @jonnyneviripine Honey....calling Clark baker names doesn't win criminal cases. If YOU have the info the DAs need to win their cases then send it them right away!!! I know...you can forward them the wiki link!!

    You don't even know what "quote mining" or "cherry picking" is. You can't give any examples. You're just repeating what you read on the Ministry of Aidstruth. Try a site not sponsored by the companies whose products they promote.

  • Google.....More Prosecutors Dropping Criminal HIV Charges

    "We expect this trend to continue,” says OMSJ Director Clark Baker. “While the AIDS industry has convinced Americans of the alleged AIDS epidemic, prosecutors have a hard time finding anyone willing to promote their propaganda under penalty of perjury.”

    A fatal flaw with HIV tests leaves prosecutors with no credible witnesses from local, state or federal health agencies ...."

  • Why not go and get an HIV test? You can discuss your concerns with people who do the testing, the lab technicians. Maybe they can put you straight. Quote mining some sure aint the way to convince anyone of anything.

  • @jonnyneviripine Why should people make life and death decisions using UNstandardized and NONspecific antibody tests? A frikkin spelling test has standards. Lol....oh yeh....I'm sure the people at the clinic would just love to be sued for going around handing out death sentences based on the results of those worthless tests.

  • @jonnyneviripine WHAT did I "quote mine" btw? You don't actually know what a quote mine is do you?

  • You don't understand the basics of diagnostic testing. Elisa is very sensitive, western blot very specific. If you get a positive Elisa, its followed up with either another Elisa or a Western blot. The combined accuracy is very high. If anyone doubts what I say, please check the facts with an HIV physician or expert advice service. (or on wikipedia for that matter).

  • @jonnyneviripine Neither test has a gold standard.I have the direct link to Abbott Diagnostics on my channel under the pic of the Pope. You CANT establish accuracy without a gold standard.

    Also..ha! **** wiki.....google.....The unqualified (= without qualifications) gurus of Wikipedia

  • @jonnyneviripine Google.....INTERVIEW RODNEY RICHARDS

    Why the "HIV Tests" Can't Tell You Whether You Have HIV

    Dr. Rodney Richards, PhD, Biochemist, Founding scientist for the biotech company Amgen. Collaborated with Abbott Laboratories in developing some of the first HIV tests

  • I'm a bit confused, David states that with a test that is 99.9% effective there would be 50% false positive test results and thus the test is meaningless. If a test has a 0.1% chance of creating either a false positive (someone is really HIV negative) or a false negative (someone who really is positive) that 1 person out of 1000 (0.1% of 1000) doesn't really change the validity of the test, it is still giving accurate results to 999 people out of the 1000..... did I miss something?

  • @nancyjellyfish It means that out of all reactions 50% will be "true" and 50% "false". Of course without a gold standard there's no scientific way to distinguish btw "false" and "true" reactions. If you want to see the test kit disclaimer I have the direct link on my channel under the profile pic

  • In other words the medicine could be a form of Eugenics which brings about more of chance of developing serious diseases. Its called cleaning off the herd method by those who believe in those belonging to the lower class.

  • Robert Gallo ought to be sent to the GALLOWS for giving stillbirth to HIV & thus, all the genocide that his criminal & blatant LIE$ have resulted in.

    See: FearOfTheInvisible . com for a copy of his falsified & fraudulent submission 1984 ~ yes! 26 longest years ago.

    Just as millions are only now asking "What Building 7?" ~ thanks God, millions are finally asking "Where is HIV & what AID$?"

    South Africa ~The elusive & ILLusive HIV & so-called AID$ Killing Fields of note!

  • Ok people, so the point is, always use a condom or take birth control swim four hours for everyday(like I do XD I swim on a team I'm in middle school) don't get fat wash your hands with soap every time you enter your house or touch something that you think might be even a LITTLE dirty eat balanced meals drink water a lot don't drink soda don't do drugs don't be patriotic so that we won't have all these mysteries. ZEITGEIST AND VENUS PROJECT FTW.
  • I found the whole movie of AIDS Inc. on google videos. It can be downloaded from there. Thanks so much for the astonishing facts.

  • The medical profession has turned into nothing but toxic pill pushers for Big Pharma.....a dumbed down profession taught by corrupt Big Pharma and its cohorts WHO and CDC have corrupted the entire medical profession....doctors CAN'T think for themselves a bunch of brainwashed pill dispensers that completely overlook the toxic symptoms from toxic pills they push on their patients....the whole medical system is broken from GREED...we are products of JUNK science...no wonder everything is dying

  • i think i'll just keep my Cock in my pants...how's that sound...

  • @CARLSMITH508

    But it's better if its circumcised.

  • Right or wrong - since 1989 I've been trying to locate the exact scientific document proving the existence of "hiv" as published back in 1984 by Dr. Robert Gallo when he announced that he had found the "probable cause of 'aids'" - and after all these years of researching this - this document still has not shown up.

  • @3investigators

    I remember reading something about that back in "And the Band Played One." It was boring then, but now i see the scam.

  • if everything we think we know about a.i.d.s. turns out to be dead wrong, what would that sound like? would people be held accountable? what about those who died? And the families? The a.i.d.s. industry? The celebrities? Some say it MUST be true; others say it is NOT true. We think we are always right and work so hard to prove our 'rightness.' I respect how Crowe simply states the puzzle, steps back a little, takes a breath, and shares his unpopular theory.

  • ACtually my buddy, PCR for HIV is used to quantify DNA. Although RNA PCRs are done, they are useless, because the virus enters as RNA (it is only active when it has integrated into the host's genome). THUS we look at HIV DNA .. DNA PCR: which quantifies the number of times the DNA was exponentially multiplied.

  • RNA levels are more indicative of viral load.

    Virus > Viral RNA > reverse xcriptase > DNA > host DNA > xcription > Viral RNA.

    One copy of host DNA may produce millions of viral RNA in the process of virus multiplication.

  • Yes RNA levels are more indicative.

    But in PCR, from the RNA cDNA is synthesizes. So you aren't looking at RNA anymore.

    But you are right, the more viral RNA the higher the viral load. But we also have to take in consideration that some people have no CD4 receptors (IDK about R5 and X4).

  • Ok. I get what you are saying. You are talking about ccr5 and cxcr4.

    There are moities that HIV cannot bind to, and those who do not have them at all.

    ccr5 delta 32, and ccr5 negatives. Science of cxcr4 is not as well understood.

  • IDK what moities are.. sorry :(

    but yeah, i guess if the co-repector to CD4 isn't there , then it can't enter.

    But yeah, you are right X4 isn't all that well understood. I remember that X4 tropic viruses are the ones that initially infect us, but R5 are the ones that are then transferred from one cell to another (same host). Actually ppl with full blown out AIDs have only R5 viruses left in their body. its insane.

  • typo moiety. Not sure if it is used strictly correctly in this context, but it is understood. Functional group essentially. So a variance on CCR5 makes the virus unable to bind (or less able to bind).

    My understanding of the shift in tropisms is that the cxcr4 tropic viruses are more effective at killing cells, and the ccr5 tropics are more effective at replicating.

    And it is my understanding that r5s predominate in 1ary infxn.

    But nice to actually talk to someone who has a clue.

  • Good point. I wonder what the differences are in R5 and X4 viruses.

    And thank you :). I am guessing you are a researcher of some sort?

  • Not me. But my buddy does some research on the side, and we talk about it all the time. We are ER docs in Atlanta & his research topic before getting into med school was HIV tropisms. His screen name is CCR5CXCR4, ironically.

    MABS to block CCR5 or using adenoviruses to deliver zinc fingers to alter the genes for ccr5 are showing some promise.

    I do not know why MABs to cxcr4 has not been effective, but that has not shown the same promise.

    I just come here to break denialist balls.

  • You are an ER doc. Very nice. I actually too want to be a doctor, but I still have 3 years of college to get thru (+ med school and such).

    I worked at Inf. Dis. Lab. over the summer, loved it.

    Really, I did not know that this was being done.

    But I wouldn't be surprised that X4 wasn't as promising. We always use HIV-Bal cuz it is R5 and shows more consistent results.

    BTW. i love that you said you "break denialist balls" because my aspiration in life is to crush balls (of people who are wrong).

  • Med school isn't really all that difficult if you work reasonably hard. If you want to give yourself a leg up, go ahead and start learning micro. Get a hold of a good micro for dummies text & learn what is gram +, gram -, mycobacteria, etc. Then go ahead and learn anatomy. Bones, muscles, ennervation. Also get a neuro coloring book. Sounds stupid, really helps. If you start now, by the time you get into med school, those will be easy.

    And start taking practice MCATS sooner, not later.

  • Woopy gram + - bacteria down 700 pages to go lol.

    I want to take anatomy and physiology next year. Neuro coloring book (interesting). I have also heard that taking biochem is really helpful (since organic was a walk in the park for me, i am hoping biochem will be too).

    Thank you for the advice.

  • I hated organic. But I kicked ass at physics and the rest. Biochem can be a beast. You need to do well in your u-grad courses, but for m-school, the key info are the rate-limiting steps and cofactors required.

    Ex: Pyruvate dehydrogenase requires what cofactors, and why do we care? Well we care, because PDH is a key enzyme linking glycolysis and the citrate cycle (krebs). If you are lacking in a cofactor then your oxidative respiration will be compromised (can be fatal).

  • None of it is particularly hard. Just a lot of info. And I mean a lot.

  • The neurocoloring books help you fix where the tracts and nucleii are in your mind. If you can draw it, you know it.

  • Cooooey

  • Don't worry about the nth level of detail. Learn the basics now. You can add detail later. Also a BASIC path text and pharm text. Again. Don't learn details. Get the overview. Learn what the basic beta blockers are, different types of antibiotics, etc, and learn the BASIC MOA & only the worst side effects (like death, liver failure, etc). You will add detail later, but knowing the basics day 1 will make Med School a pleasure.

    Uh. And MCAT practice tests. Start now.

  • CXCR4 tropism is sufficient to trigger CD4+ T cell depletion in HIV-1-infected human lymphoid tissue.

    Program Abstr 6th Conf Retrovir Oppor Infect Conf Retrovir Oppor Infect 6th 1999 Chic Ill. 1999 Jan 31-Feb 4; 6th: 168 (abstract no. 537).

    Is my source for my info.

  • HIV virus is cultured in T-cell lymphocytes.. Well from the media of those lymphocytes, not the cells themselves.

  • Answer is: Not every single virus mutates in the same exact fashion. Lets say a virus mutates and its Tat gene is not functional. That means that particular viral particle dies. However, the rest of the virues don't.

    Reason why they have remained unchanged is because they are TOO vital. Although I am sure that polymerase I can't detect what is important, thru natural selection, the virus that are way too mutated are eliminated, thus those that function are the ones that are left! Explained

  • The ART Cohort Collaboration: Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies. Lancet 2008; 372: 293-299.

    HAART Has Extended Average Life Expectancy of HIV Positive People in Wealthy Countries by 13 Years since 1996

    • Crude mortality rates decreased from 16.3 deaths per 1000 person-years (PY) during 1996-1999 to 10.0 per 1000 PY during 2003-2005 -- a decrease of about 40%.

  • "25 years of science"

    Solution? We have been trying to cure viral diseases for over 100 years. Guess what they are hard to cure.

    Or solution as in effective treatment. Which we have.

    Man on the moon? Vastly simpler problem than cell biology & biochemistry. Ask any competent physicist.

    "I don't need any evidence" Perfect commentary on you. You don't know anything about science or how science works.

  • "Sorry man, that is not how science works!" Actually it is. You make a claim, you have to provide evidence of that claim.

    It has already been demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that HIV is the causal agent of AIDS. It is up to you to come to terms with it, or put forth your evidence of another theory.

    Until then, you are just whining in the wake of the bus. Sitting on the side of the road, bitter because you have been left behind.

    Bye now.

  • Then why has 25 years of science failed to put forth a solution to a known problem?

    We put a man on the moon in a decade because we wanted to.

  • You are correct, there is not one. There are thousands. HIV is the causal agent of AIDS. If you have evidence to the contrary, then I invite you to present it for peer review.

    Until then, you have already lost.

  • there are true tests that prove you have HIV... simple t cell count. Viral load. p24 amounts. PCR on its genes (tat, rev, nef and so on) TLR 3, 4 7 8 9 stimulation.. and much more..

    but yes.. since HIV does thrive in inflammation, the drugs that usually are made for it end up hurting ppl..

    HIV mutates a lot, so its hard to find anything that works, unless you help it mutate so much that it becomes inactive.

  • Dartplayer. All of the evidence supports the fact that HIV cases AIDS. If you wish to provide some evidence for another theory feel free to submit it for peer review.

    Until that time, you have forfeited the argument.

  • Peer reviewed article:  HIV causes AIDS: Koch's Postulates Fulfilled.

  • Antibodies are no indicationthat your body has "defeated the virus." People with herpes have antibodies to the virus, and live with the virus for the rest of their lives.

    It is obvious dart, that you don't have the slightest idea wat you are talking about. And yet you expect people to accept YOU as an expert? And biology 101 student can spot your bullshit at first glance.

  • you idiot. The fact there is no serious world wide pandemic of HIV is proof of how effective medical prevention can be!

    just like the swin flu virus will reduce rate of infection the moment people start taking the vaccine!

    you are a moron. go selll your BS elsewhere.

  • I was talking about prevention.

    And it's not AIDS that will get a vaccine for it. It's HIV. do you even know what AIDS means? by your post my bet is: you don't.

    vaccines don't kill virus you ignorant moron. They "teach" the immune system how to kill the virus or bacteria.

    I compared your condom post to vaccines. How prevention is amazingly effective.

  • that's right, but it is an indication that the virus is there (or at least one with a VERY similar molecular structure, pH level, charge.. etc)

  • There are prostitues all over the world that do this constantly. Funny thing is.....there are still prostitutes!

  • That actually shows your ignorance of science. Mullis also says that there are many people that will say that HIV causes AIDS and that it is undisputable. There very fact that they say it is undisputable should lead you to question it......you're saying nope without actually watching the video in question shows your ignorance. The facts are recorded. You can say nope, but you just look like an idiot in doing so.

  • fact is that people who claim that HIV causes AIDS have thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers proving such casuality.

    kary mullis have nothing but empty claims.

    you are the ignorant person. and that's why i call you an idiot.

  • not one paper? lol... and you claim to be a logical genius? lol...

    please say what would be the logic to give a nobel prize in 2008 for the discovery of HIV to Prof Luc Montaigner if he didn't present evidence he isolated the virus?

    ODD is you saying that avert say that. Because it takes me less than one minute to find hundreds of papers to find evidence of hiv and its casuality to AIDS.

  • AVERT org, page:

    The evidence that HIV causes Aids:

    reference 28, for example:

    Koch's Postulates Fulfilled, NIH, 1995 - a reference on how HIV fills all of the postulates.

    You should read the page in its entirity.

    Do tell, can you tell me why the moon is not flat just by looking at it?

    or why the sky is blue?

    better: what is a virus?

    go get some education you quack

  • How about Kary Mullis? Since he invented the PCR process, would he qualify as someone who knows something about the process?

  • Is this man a Doctor? If not he should not be taking on this subject.

  • No. He is a failed biology student turned computer major. He has zero qualifications in the fields of medicine, biology, biochemistry, or ANY scientific degree whatsoever.

    Google "David Crowe takes it way beyond HIV denial"

    These HIV denial people are cultists. Nothing more, nothing less. They are anti-scientific.

    NOW he is claiming that the flu virus is not contagious, and may not exist....

  • Jesus this guy is out of his mind. The worst part is that he will get people killed.

  • "never even found" A blatant lie. Grow the fuck up.

    Which "hiv test?" You act like there is only one. There are dozens. Each of them has different strengths and weaknesses.

    And NONE of them say any such thing. Jesus. GROW THE FUCK UP!

  • Has there been a study on the shift in projected AIds / HIV figures due specifically to disinformation efforts by HIV/AIDS dissidents (not AIDS dissidents)

  • I'm not totally sure what you mean but this article is pretty good regarding aids stats

    "Noteworthy Successes Against Aids In Africa"

    Essentially the viral theory of acquired immondeficiency asks people to believe that African were well nigh immortal prior to the virus of mass destruction.

  • Health officials claim that AIDS dissidents are causing harm with their incorrect information, I would like to see a study on that. Similar to population projections, with and without illegal immigrants. I'd like to see one projecting AIDS/HIV prevalence with and without (disinforming) dissident propaganda.

  • If you think dissidents are guilty of disinforming people wouldn't it be better to ask a mainstream health official that question? I do know that none of their previous projections have come true.

    Dissidents are censored in the media so I don't know how much impact they could be claimed to be causing either way. What do you think is disinfo exactly? You know the global hetero epidemic was cancelled (except for black people) right?

  • That was kinda my point.

    I know there are people whose job it is to type counter arguments on sites like youtube all day. Job, as in they get paid.

  • Sorry, my bad. Why not ask conotoxin/CCR5/CroakerMD/ the humanshots 1-3/nousides/ilfousdeteguele/r­asinxful etc etc?

    He's a shill. He'll know all of the shill script.

  • You know, seriously though, this is all irrelevant. I'm the guy who thinks he can fly, some how. I've seen all kinds of crazy shit and I'm not 30 yet, I can't imagine that dynasties would be more ignorant than I am. Life is about something that humans have not experienced in thousands of years. Sometimes I fear I will become as corrupt as those who hold the reigns if ever I were given the power I seek. But I don't seek it for myself, to me, this world is garbage that needs cleaning up

  • I can't tell if you're a shill or just another human who's consumed to much information. Cuz you're fukin freakin out. All those crazy videos on your page, you must understand it might send the wrong message. I have this kind of foresight, i really hope you're human. Human, as in you're not trying to fuck up real human progress, and I'm not talking about saving the planet, super duper gfx chips or fuel efficient hybrids. Whatever farm, prison, or sanctuary the earth was fathomed to be it will

  • David, you're out of your mind. Your buddy, Christine Maggiore, didn't use an HIV antiviral a day in her life and lived an organic, holistic lifestyle.  Yet, she just died in the prime of her life with disseminated herpes, bi-lateral pneumonia and oral thrush.

    She got "sicker and sicker" not from the "drugs" David, but from massive immune destruction that you REFUSE to accept was caused by HIV. Whatever David, whatever!

  • She got sicker from the ENORMOUS psychological stress of losing her daughter, enduring a year long investigation as murder suspect, undergoing a high tech stoning campaign in the media and then...fasting and having a bunch colonics even after she began to feel run down from all the stress.

    Jim Henson died at the same age and nobody called his death an aids death

  • What stress was Jim Henson under? Too many muppets underfoot?

  • HIV cannot be responsible for AIDS. After three years of intensive critical studies of the relevant scientific literature, as an experienced virologist and molecular biologist I came to the following surprising conclusion — there is actually no single scientifically really convincing evidence for the existence of HIV. Not even once has such a retrovirus been isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology.

    Letter to Süddeutsche Zeitung 2000

  • quote is by..

    — Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology and a former director of the Department of Viroid Research, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Germany; Recipient of the international Robert Koch award for medical research, 1978*

    That's WHY the tests have no gold standard. Without a direct isolate from fresh plasma they have nothing to compare them to.

    SURPRISE!

  • I thought that HIV was what the American and French guy discovered and patented the test and shared the profits. So which camp am I supposed to believe, I can't create cyborgs and study biology

  • Google...."Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers'

    The original papers are fraudulent and the original sample of "hiv' was stolen and didn't even come from someone with aids.

  • The original papers can be seen for yourself at Fearoftheinvisible com

  • Dr. Chin has shared some of his inside knowledge in a new book with the telling title: The AIDS Pandemic: The Collision of Epidemiology with Political Correctness. In it he reveals that an AIDS epidemic was never expected in Europe or North America. He also explains how the inflated figures were used to scare the population and to argue for higher budgets.

    excerpt is from...Aids: are we being deceived?

  • Who is David Crowe?

    I missed that - err, this man has no credentials.

    Most of you people are insane, ignorant, and frankly are offending the millions of innocent human beings dead of HIV/AIDS

  • more evidence: read the nobel prize abstract and see how the virus was isolated and identified in humans

    more: "History of AIDS", by Mirko D. Grmek, old, but may answer some answers

    "Pediatric AIDS", by Philip A. Pizzo - HIV isolated in placenta

    "HIV Prevention", by Kenneth H. Mayer - explanation in it's sexual transmission

    "Human Retroviral Infections" by Kenneth E. Ugen - simple but direct in explanation

  • If it had ever been isolated the tests would have the gold standard.

    I think you need to research what the aids researchers are "calling" isolation what isolation is supposed to be.

    I saw the original aids papers and a letter from Gallo admitting he couldn't isolate out of any of the original aids cases. Montagnier just happened to be the guy that Gallo stole a sample from

    You can see the papers for yourself at Fearoftheinvisible com

  • In fact.....you should also research what the gold standard is, how it achieved and why it is necessary.

  • mykoo, your denyal of HIV is just another way of showing how much you lack in any kind of scientific understanding in any matter related to microbiology or immunology...

  • Your sexually transmitted epidemic was cancelled last summer.

    June 2008

    Dr. Kevin de Cock of the World Health Organization: "[T]here will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa."

    also see on the Guardian

    "The exploitation of Aids"

    The Aids scare was one of the most distorted, duplicitous and cynical public health panics of the last 30 years

    &

    There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

  • 1) HIV particles have never been demonstrated by electron microscopy in the blood stream of AIDS patients allegedly presenting with high viral load.

    4) Public credulity is abused by the constant publication of HIV images that all derive from electron microscopy of laboratory cell cultures, and NEVER derive directly from AIDS patients.

    December 8, 2003, address to European Parliament Conference on AIDS in Africa, Brussels

  • quote is by... Dr. Etienne de Harven, MD, Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto (1981-1993). Professor of Cell Biology, Cornell Graduate School of Medical Science (1968-1981). Associate Professor (1964-1968). Assistant Professor, Pathology. Université Libre de Bruxells (1956-1962). Belgian Air Force Medical Corps (1953-1956). Author of over 100 peer-reviewed medical papers on virology, cancer, immunology and electron microscopy.

    Rethinkaids com quotes on ads section

  • There are not sufficient enough data to understand the properties of HIV because the scientific literature is nothing more than opinions, poorly conducted studies and reviews of poorly conducted studies.

    — Dr. Howard Urnovitz, PhD, Microbiologist and Immunologist, Science Director, Chronic Illness Research Foundation, co-founder and CEO, Chronix Biomedical. Dr. Urnovitzs team developed the only FDA-licensed urine-based diagnostic test for antibodies to HIV.

    Rethinkaids com

  • O'Neil et al. J Infect Dis 2000;182:1051; Aldrovandi et al. Nature 1993;363:732; Liska et al. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 1999;15:445; Locher et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;22:523; Hirsch et al. Virus Res 1994;32:183; Joag et al. J Virol 1996;70:3189

  • Dr. Howard Urnovitz, PhD - the inventor of one HIV diagnose test... so you believe in HIV now? you must...if you used a quote from the inventor of a test to identify HIV...

    but well: "93 HHS employees from agencies including the NIH, FDA and CDC, published a declaration in the journal Nature stating that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS"

  • Lol...if that's how you want to take it,

    Science isn't a democracy. You don't get to VOTE on what's true. .lol

  • Here's what else he has to say....

    [Anthony] Fauci is one of the US Governments major architects of the myth that HIV has been proven to be the cause of AIDS and that stopping HIV will save livesa myth that has become so entrenched in medicines conventional wisdom that to question it is tantamount [to] treason.

  • as i said HIV causes AIDS in more than 90% of the infected. This is a fact.

    You just need to read evidence, instead of going for opinion articles from doctors who have no credibility in terms of research in the subject or stop reading quackery

  • all those scientists you posted are retireda nd are completly lost in terms of new understanding of the HIV. They said some quack stuff YEARS AGO. and now there is still some denialists who love to pick their quackery once and awhile...

    do you want to pick the hundreds of present leading scientists who know that HIV is real and causes AIDS? just go to WHO and search "aids" or "HIV"

  • You mean all those scientists sponsored by aids drug companies?

    SHILLFACTOR

    "I don't have a problem with doctors making $3,000 or $5,000 a year on the side, but it's a totally different thing when they're making $80,000." Even more distasteful is that the slides used in many of these presentations are created by the drug makers--not the speakers. "That's like ghost-talking."

    - Dr. Robert J. Alpern

    Dean, Yale School of Medicine

  • uhm...proof that all the doctors i posted are not sponsored by aids drug companies? you failed to prove that those 93HHS empoyees are all being paid by pharma corp.

    You are failing to prove that thousands of medical doctors in the world are being paid to support aids drug companies ( i know more than a dozen personnaly, some even study HIV and don't get a dime for it)

    The dean Dr Robert was not mentioning ALL doctors, just a minority

  • They don't ALL have to be sponsored. Just the policy makers.

  • give proof of how many policy makers are sponsored by pharma corp. as i said you'll have hundreds to prove that they are being manipulated.

    You'll have to prove that every single hospital is being manipulated.

    be real mykoo...

  • I did. Go to

    Shillfactor net

    It's federal law for people to disclose conflicts of interests. There they are

  • Shillfactor net

    what about this website... have you seen the disclaimer at the end of the page???

    "in no way endorse or support a thesis which denies any of the following: That HIV is necessary in the causation of the immune deficiency syndrome called AIDS;That HIV is heterosexually as well as homosexually transmitted;

    " and much more

    If you use that website for your data you are accepting that HIV- AIDS exist

  • LMAO.....that is NOT the purpose of the site.

    No...I use that site to see the disclosures of the massive conflicts of interests at work..

    Duh...

  • The conflicts of interest aren't even limited to the aids industry.

    It's a problem across the board.

  • 93HHS plus hundreds of scientists accept and have given proof that HIV-AIDS exist.

    the only conflict is inside denialists heads...

  • Ad populum.

    "Everyone knows' isn't evidence..lol

    Where the hell did your global heterosexual aids pandemic go? It only exists in your head

  • i gave you the numbers of heterossexual people infected in germany

    do you want the number of heterossexual ppl infected in the entire world?

    i tould you that there is a wide spread of aids in the world. Not a pandemic.

    Heterossexuals and Homossexuals both have HIV infection, there is no point in distinguish between the 2. both might get HIV- AIDS

  • Yeah...you confirmed that "hiv" rates have remained VERY low in a country where there are tons of hookers and people can't be persuaded to buy condoms.

  • uhm... do you know that prostitues have higher rates of condom use than the regular couples?

    do you even know that HIV has increased in older couples due to the fact that the man goes to prostitues?

    data: Portugal, until 30 jun 2002: 20,256 hiv infectins, 9,386 AIDS, 357 HIV2, 130 HIV1 and 2.

    2001: homo - 5,8% aids cases, heterossexuals 35,7%, drug-addicts 53,7 %

  • Lmao....YES...that's the point. The only people that buy condoms are probably the hookers. The general population doesn't.

    Who CARES about what a NONspecific antibody test has to say about anything?

    I fid it contradictory that one hand you claim that hookers have a higher ate of condom usuage and then attribute older men testing + to visiting hookers

    Maybe they're just testing + because they got a flu shot. That's one of the KNOWN conditions which can cause a false +

  • "The general population doesn't."- you rally are a denial and dumb person...have you seen the numbers of condoms sold in the world? or you keep being in denial and refuse to read the numbers?

    gp120 and gp41, are not nonspecific, they are 99% indicators of HIV infection, i gave you the references already

  • We were talking about GERMANY!

    GERMANS don't buy condoms and yet...."hiv" has remained very low.

    I just gave you the references which says that p41 is NOT specific