@RunNowlzRun Bullshit dinosaurs had more efficient lungs than animals, AND their nostrils were NOT in any way small,AND even if they were they could simply breath through their mouth or something, but there's no way an enormous group will die off just because their nostrils are to small to handle an oxygen decrease
I cant stand people sitting infront of a camera like this. You may be a genius and i agree with you, but i dont need to se your face nor your room in 240 to get your points.
@RunBowlzIRun Actually since Dinosaurs had such small nostrils the percentage of oxygen in the air had to be MUCH higher for them to actually breathe. Which means they could grow bigger. Today we don't have nearly as much in the atmosphere.
@RunBowlzIRun your an IDIOT!!!!! Dinosaurs had much more efficient lungs than mammals and required LESS oxygen. That is why Their group took off after the Permian Extinction when O2 levels were dangerously low.
I believe in evolution ... I wish we could kill all theist and creationist.... By doing so human race wiould get smarter. Only stupid people believe that religious bullshit !!!! The world needs a good ond fasioned cull.....
Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
Well the guy in this video pretty much said everything I was going to say. It's very sad to see people falling for this creationist crap and yet very funny to mock them.
Young-earth creationists are indeed stupid. They think that scientific idea that does not agree with the Bible is automatically bad science. They need to keep that dumbassery to themselves.
1)Remember Noah could have brought the babies or kids, the largest egg ever found was a s big as a football therefore dinosaurs where small during their childhood, there where many problems with the ark, but space was not on of them.
2)´´Mistakes´´ help to explain the variation in living things, but that in now way proves that chimps and humans have a common ancestor
1) So Noah bought 2 baby dinosaurs of the 900 known types of dinosaurs we are aware of, along with all the other animals, plus his family, and their significant others, as well as enough supplies to feed everyone and maintain the ship. Is that right?
2) "Variation" is what evolution is all about, and what the theory of evolution seeks to explain. "Mistakes" in and of themselves don't prove "that chimps and humans have a common ancestor", but chimp & human genomes do.
1) Yes. Because accumulated variations within a population sounds so much more implausible than a giant wooden boat filled with 2 of every species that ever existed, and sailed for a year during a cataclysm without mishap.
2) Some creationists DO deny variation, and evolution is only HOW the variation occurs. Humans are missing a primate chromosome pair. Now that pair either became fused, or we aren't related to the chimp. Human chromosome #2 is fused version of chimp chromosomes #12 and #13.
You say 'ill do research' but to be honest if your previous research led you to believe that Noah single handedly saved 2 of every species on an ark from a global disaster, then I wouldn't bother. How on earth can you not recognise this is an old story? How did he cater for their different diets? How did he cater for their different climate and environmental needs with them all in the same place? How did they get enough exercise? How did he stop them breeding on the ark? You'll do research, lol.
And all these animals sat safely on the ark for 40 days and nights without eating or drinking anything? The ark packed with thousands of species constantly moving around never capsized or hit anything, and somehow species such as earthworms who can't survive long outside soil just sort of waited it out without dying?
@RunNowlzRun Bullshit dinosaurs had more efficient lungs than animals, AND their nostrils were NOT in any way small,AND even if they were they could simply breath through their mouth or something, but there's no way an enormous group will die off just because their nostrils are to small to handle an oxygen decrease
kyekire 1 day ago
I cant stand people sitting infront of a camera like this. You may be a genius and i agree with you, but i dont need to se your face nor your room in 240 to get your points.
LatemNam666 1 year ago
you are pretty cock sure someone is going to make a video response.
rd1999 1 year ago
Dinosaurs were saved. They just went through micro evolution and dont grow as big. Most of them are still living with us today.
RunBowlzIRun 1 year ago
@RunBowlzIRun Only the dinosaurs with feathers are still living with us today .
gregrutz 1 year ago
@RunBowlzIRun Actually since Dinosaurs had such small nostrils the percentage of oxygen in the air had to be MUCH higher for them to actually breathe. Which means they could grow bigger. Today we don't have nearly as much in the atmosphere.
RunBowlzIRun 9 months ago
@RunBowlzIRun your an IDIOT!!!!! Dinosaurs had much more efficient lungs than mammals and required LESS oxygen. That is why Their group took off after the Permian Extinction when O2 levels were dangerously low.
RomanHistoryNut 4 months ago
so..... u just wanna start a flame war every week. :-\
webguy943 1 year ago
I believe in evolution ... I wish we could kill all theist and creationist.... By doing so human race wiould get smarter. Only stupid people believe that religious bullshit !!!! The world needs a good ond fasioned cull.....
SuperAgnostic1 1 year ago
@SuperAgnostic1 You mad brah?
RunBowlzIRun 1 year ago
Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!!!!!!!!???? Santa Claus is not real :(
Sob sob sob
Satybp666 1 year ago
UR A RETART CUZ I SAY SO
andrew3656 1 year ago
i disagree that creationists are retards they are not that clever
calanbaker 2 years ago
add an 's' to the title sir. good idea, but americans dont understand science.
thesunofjuda 2 years ago
Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
markpianoman 2 years ago
Well the guy in this video pretty much said everything I was going to say. It's very sad to see people falling for this creationist crap and yet very funny to mock them.
richd506 2 years ago
why i'm a fucking retard and why?
thats why.
crabbykid111 3 years ago 2
what happened to once a week? you only have one video.
crabbykid111 3 years ago 2
Young-earth creationists are indeed stupid. They think that scientific idea that does not agree with the Bible is automatically bad science. They need to keep that dumbassery to themselves.
Darkninja105 3 years ago 2
1)dinosaurs where also saved
2) evolution also starts with the conclution
a01011399 3 years ago
1) So Noah saved 2 of every dinosaur?
2) Actually evolution starts with a question, "If X evolved, Y had to have happened. If Y didn't happen, then X didn't evolve."
Atriviality 3 years ago
1) yes
2) ¿for example? givme an example of a ´´Y´´ that if it would not happen X can not evolve
a01011399 3 years ago
1) Must have been awfully crowded on that boat, and precariously balanced too, not to mention the food issues for living on a boat for a year.
2) If errors in reproduction(Y) did not occur, living organisms(X) can not evolve.
Atriviality 3 years ago
1)Remember Noah could have brought the babies or kids, the largest egg ever found was a s big as a football therefore dinosaurs where small during their childhood, there where many problems with the ark, but space was not on of them.
2)´´Mistakes´´ help to explain the variation in living things, but that in now way proves that chimps and humans have a common ancestor
a01011399 3 years ago
1) So Noah bought 2 baby dinosaurs of the 900 known types of dinosaurs we are aware of, along with all the other animals, plus his family, and their significant others, as well as enough supplies to feed everyone and maintain the ship. Is that right?
2) "Variation" is what evolution is all about, and what the theory of evolution seeks to explain. "Mistakes" in and of themselves don't prove "that chimps and humans have a common ancestor", but chimp & human genomes do.
Atriviality 3 years ago
1) yes and that in now way saunds more ridicoluos than evolution, and the big bang
2) creationists do not deny variation, so there is no point in discousing it. ¿what can we find in the human genome that would prove evolution wrong?
a01011399 3 years ago
1) Yes. Because accumulated variations within a population sounds so much more implausible than a giant wooden boat filled with 2 of every species that ever existed, and sailed for a year during a cataclysm without mishap.
2) Some creationists DO deny variation, and evolution is only HOW the variation occurs. Humans are missing a primate chromosome pair. Now that pair either became fused, or we aren't related to the chimp. Human chromosome #2 is fused version of chimp chromosomes #12 and #13.
Atriviality 3 years ago
well to be honest I am unable to refute the fusion argument, but it will probably be the next topic i´ll do research on.
please watch my last video, and please try to answer to the questions
a01011399 3 years ago
You say 'ill do research' but to be honest if your previous research led you to believe that Noah single handedly saved 2 of every species on an ark from a global disaster, then I wouldn't bother. How on earth can you not recognise this is an old story? How did he cater for their different diets? How did he cater for their different climate and environmental needs with them all in the same place? How did they get enough exercise? How did he stop them breeding on the ark? You'll do research, lol.
SamCoreJ 7 months ago
And all these animals sat safely on the ark for 40 days and nights without eating or drinking anything? The ark packed with thousands of species constantly moving around never capsized or hit anything, and somehow species such as earthworms who can't survive long outside soil just sort of waited it out without dying?
captainocelot 3 years ago