Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Hmm, what if you found a way to encase your feet it it, encorporating them into lift? Or at least getting rid of any drag?
ElijahJohnSanders 1 year ago
@ElijahJohnSanders incorporating the feet into the fin would hinder the bioengineering. the fin is multijointed, allowing for similar movements like a dolphin's tail for maximum propulsion. it would completely prevent these joints from properly flexing for the "backlash" needed in the water. lunocet has been modeled after nature in the most accurate ways possible. so far, the fin stretches, cups, reforms, and creates resistance in the water at just the right points with each flick.
xferalisx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I ordered a lunocet monofin and never received it after multiple promises/excuses from Ted Ciamillo. I ended up having to dispute the charge with my credit card company after a classic "your check is in the mail" final promise that a refund was coming. BTW, the check never arrived but thankfully my credit card company was very supportive of my dispute. Bottomline.... BEWARE!!!!
jonscott36305 2 years ago
Most other monofins have a lot more surface area, so what makes this as good or more effective? Airfoil?
vladimir2277 2 years ago
Surface area = drag. Most monofins rely on the push against the water to move it forward. This one... well... uh... best way to describe it = Bernoulli's principle. They based it off of dolphin's tail. Much more effective than just relying on the push of the water.
ChipmunkTamer 2 years ago
jebeno
fratun 2 years ago