Vickers was my favorite dramatic tenor and he was wonderful as Florestan. As for the ending of this aria, it works because of the frantic emotion that Vickers puts into this performance. For me opera is just not about pretty notes. It is believing in the character. With Vickers (and a few other great singers) I believe.
this piece makes me cry its so horrible! Of course I'm not referring to the singing and acting which is fabulous Its just so horrible FOR Florestan!*tears welling up* he's thinking he sees a vison of Leonore, his angel, and he gets so much strength just from thinking about her and how much he loves her. And then at the end of the aria the slump to the ground is almost like a realization that it was just a dream and he's alone again and facing death... :-( so sad
Negate me all you like, but there's no denying that a performance is flawed when the tone goes flat. Vickers was a great singer, but I don't like this performance. His voice sounds flat at the end, and he barks out the German text, making him sound more like a German prison guard than a prisoner himself.
I totally agree with you hedgechair. And I might add that Dermota sang it too on the night when Patzak cancelled. It was an opening night, a night after the premiere of Don Giovanni in which he sang Ottavio.
For those of you who never heard him live, I can justifiably assert that he had the biggest voice of any singer I ever heard. His voice was a cannon--although he was just as stunning in his pianissimi as one witnesses here.
A marvelous gift of nature. An openness and volubility that was just amazing.
I agree ipmoic. I heard him sing this role at the Met, but I also remember him doing Peter Grimes there and in the Mad Scene, his voice filled the hall physically, as if that barn were too small for his voice.
Wow - I suppose it says a lot that this magnificent record of Vickers' Florestan excites such heated debate. He was and remains monumental - in the same tradition as Patzak and Windgassen, although obviously heavier than either. James King and Jess Thomas were also notable Florestans, and personally I prefer King to Vickers because he is more inclined to let the music speak for itself and Vickers could be rather mannered. Heppner and Domingo both have their virtues as Florestan, as did Jerusalem
To all warring parties. If we argue about singers we love, instead of celebrating them, the world is in trouble. Kaufmann can sing wonderfully with a most un-german sound and a big nod to Vickers. Vickers is Vickers, however, and his elemental sound is unique in the age of recording.
you suck! kaufman's sound is clearly artificially produced as it is woofy and their is very little squillante! Do you even listen to the voice? Or do you just get all swept up in the music like most novice listeners!?
@Winterwonnemond I don´t even know why are they compared?? They are so diferent, nor the same voice color, nor the same (or even close) stage presence. Nor the same operatic time. Like oil and water.
Gosh...Vickers could play one twisted or pained individual. And his voice is soooo large, but he manages to sing with amazing line and sensitivity. I love it.
Its so unfortunate that his poor technique cost him his voice on many night... I have a DVD with him singing this and his voice sounds like his chords are sandpaper rubbing on each other. On the other hand i don't think anyone performed with the artistic intensity that he did.
Whenever Beethoven brings in the "Leonora Theme" the music breaks my heart. It must take great control not to break into tears when one actually sings this performance.
I heard him twice as Florestan at Covent Garden, first in 1961 with Amy Schuard as Leonora, and again about 15 years later with Helga Dernesch. He was magnificent. I can think of only one other tenor who was as moving as Florestan: Julius Patzak.
He is great singer and artist. Natural voice, not like some popular tenors... And great impression of his playing. In my clip collection I have fragment of this aria. Welcome!
The first time I heard Vickers live was as Florestan in Chicago, in 1981. How his voice echoed through the Lyric Opera House during that "Gott" is forever etched on my memory, as well as his extraordinary artistry. The two combined to bring tears to my eyes. We shall not see his like again.
To Steveandien: Interesting you say that... I have the same recollection of his voice ringing in my ears "during that Gott" after I heard him in a concert version of Fidelio in San Juan, PR in 1971.
We each heard a great artist at his best, despite ten years' passing -- I feel so fortunate to have heard Vickers live in this performance, as well as in his Parsifal five years later -- would that I could have heard his Otello, Tristan and Peter Grimes (all of which I heard on recordings, some live) in person as well:) --
Kaufmann could not begin to shine Vickers' shoes - Jonas has a LOOONG way to go before being even mentioned in the same breath!
DonPaolissimo 4 months ago
Vickers was my favorite dramatic tenor and he was wonderful as Florestan. As for the ending of this aria, it works because of the frantic emotion that Vickers puts into this performance. For me opera is just not about pretty notes. It is believing in the character. With Vickers (and a few other great singers) I believe.
bb1111116 5 months ago
@bb1111116
Thank you for a very true and prescient response!
Nello7 5 months ago
this piece makes me cry its so horrible! Of course I'm not referring to the singing and acting which is fabulous Its just so horrible FOR Florestan!*tears welling up* he's thinking he sees a vison of Leonore, his angel, and he gets so much strength just from thinking about her and how much he loves her. And then at the end of the aria the slump to the ground is almost like a realization that it was just a dream and he's alone again and facing death... :-( so sad
babs22hh 7 months ago
Find ich einfach grausam. Tut mir leid, wenn ich die ganzen Vicker Fans damit enttäusche..
Stingerfyle 1 year ago
Negate me all you like, but there's no denying that a performance is flawed when the tone goes flat. Vickers was a great singer, but I don't like this performance. His voice sounds flat at the end, and he barks out the German text, making him sound more like a German prison guard than a prisoner himself.
petrina1022 2 years ago
As there is no last wave from the sea , right
now there is no one to match Vickers in this role ,he owned it for us who have seen him in it .but in time
there will be another-after all there were no contraltos on the
scene and now we have Podles - you just gotta wait !!
dziady1 2 years ago
I totally agree with you hedgechair. And I might add that Dermota sang it too on the night when Patzak cancelled. It was an opening night, a night after the premiere of Don Giovanni in which he sang Ottavio.
dermotafan 2 years ago
For those of you who never heard him live, I can justifiably assert that he had the biggest voice of any singer I ever heard. His voice was a cannon--although he was just as stunning in his pianissimi as one witnesses here.
A marvelous gift of nature. An openness and volubility that was just amazing.
ipmoic 2 years ago
I agree ipmoic. I heard him sing this role at the Met, but I also remember him doing Peter Grimes there and in the Mad Scene, his voice filled the hall physically, as if that barn were too small for his voice.
pisherfamily 2 years ago
Wow - I suppose it says a lot that this magnificent record of Vickers' Florestan excites such heated debate. He was and remains monumental - in the same tradition as Patzak and Windgassen, although obviously heavier than either. James King and Jess Thomas were also notable Florestans, and personally I prefer King to Vickers because he is more inclined to let the music speak for itself and Vickers could be rather mannered. Heppner and Domingo both have their virtues as Florestan, as did Jerusalem
Cavaradossi10 2 years ago
To all warring parties. If we argue about singers we love, instead of celebrating them, the world is in trouble. Kaufmann can sing wonderfully with a most un-german sound and a big nod to Vickers. Vickers is Vickers, however, and his elemental sound is unique in the age of recording.
hedgechair 2 years ago 10
wunderbar bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
berlinman46 2 years ago
Große Stimme mit sehr starkem Wiedererkennungswert.
vocede 2 years ago
Comment removed
battletor4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry, Vickers is an amazing singer, but in this he's not even comparable to Kauffmann
Vendimi3 3 years ago
you suck! kaufman's sound is clearly artificially produced as it is woofy and their is very little squillante! Do you even listen to the voice? Or do you just get all swept up in the music like most novice listeners!?
jhgreenhorn 2 years ago 4
@jhgreenhorn Ouais, c'est sûr, quand on écoute du Beethoven, la musique on n'en a strictement rien à faire
athemag 7 months ago
...compare Kaufmann to Vickers????? Kaufmann?
dg6da 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Well, about Kaufmann...I didn't say comparable to vickers: I said BETTER.
Vendimi3 2 years ago
how can anyone prefer kaufmann over him....either vocally or artistically?
Winterwonnemond 3 years ago 22
@Winterwonnemond I don´t even know why are they compared?? They are so diferent, nor the same voice color, nor the same (or even close) stage presence. Nor the same operatic time. Like oil and water.
cantanteporsiempre 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Jolie voix mais je préfère jonas Kaufmann!
Merci
Jackylen57
jackylen57 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he has terrible technique and you have no ears for the voice!
jhgreenhorn 2 years ago
Comment removed
Stingerfyle 3 years ago
your comments give you away as a novice.
jbjorling 3 years ago 5
Comment removed
Stingerfyle 3 years ago
Yes and Yes! Stick to playing the guitar
Operafiend22 3 years ago 4
he is a little low at the end of the piece....but on the other hand can you name me one tenor who has ever sung this aria effortless, live !?
alecs1976 3 years ago
Try Jan Peerce on the Toscanini broadcast or any performance by Rosvaenge.
gaytenor 2 years ago
@gaytenor
What gives you the idea that those recordings were "live"...??? in neither one you can hear an audience ....
alecs1976 2 years ago
Because Thèâtre Antique d' Orange is enormous, with 12000 localities, the singers and the scene is very remote for the audience.
The singers have problems, sometimes listen the orchestra
Onegin65 2 years ago
@Onegin65
actually I was referring to the two videos "gaytenor" suggested as effortless live recordings...not to Vicker's performance....
alecs1976 2 years ago
Allright
Onegin65 2 years ago
@gaytenor ^ 5 For Rosvaenge . If Im correct there is a recording of Helge at 64 singing Floristan and he kicks ass.
tenorismo 1 year ago
Oh my god...he almost looks like Ludwig van....he would have loved it...great performance...I like him!!!
nobisotti 3 years ago
Gosh...Vickers could play one twisted or pained individual. And his voice is soooo large, but he manages to sing with amazing line and sensitivity. I love it.
Grandtenore 3 years ago 2
Nice version ,but not as good as his recorded version with Christa Ludwig as Leonore and Klemperer conducting.
135yearswaiting 3 years ago
A great artist. I heard his Otello at Covent Garden in 1977. Fantastic!
foothillsbear 3 years ago
I'm slightly envious that you heard him live! I'm sure it was quite the experience.
giacominifan 3 years ago
I did hear him live at the Met in this role. I'll never forget it.
To hear that voice, so unique in sound, in a huge house, and to experience the emotional commitment as well, was a great experience. Jake
waltercharles 3 years ago 5
Its so unfortunate that his poor technique cost him his voice on many night... I have a DVD with him singing this and his voice sounds like his chords are sandpaper rubbing on each other. On the other hand i don't think anyone performed with the artistic intensity that he did.
raythetse 3 years ago
Wow! He was huge!
Sadiesexy 4 years ago 2
The thing I love most about Vickers is that it was never just about the voice; no park and bark from him. Wonderful singer and actor.
nanbil 4 years ago 2
Florestan alive!
aeneas0troy 4 years ago
I was priveleged to have been part of this production which is still talked about in Orange
tosca1940 4 years ago
Whenever Beethoven brings in the "Leonora Theme" the music breaks my heart. It must take great control not to break into tears when one actually sings this performance.
sanjosemike
sanjosemike 4 years ago 3
I heard him twice as Florestan at Covent Garden, first in 1961 with Amy Schuard as Leonora, and again about 15 years later with Helga Dernesch. He was magnificent. I can think of only one other tenor who was as moving as Florestan: Julius Patzak.
saltburner 4 years ago
He is great singer and artist. Natural voice, not like some popular tenors... And great impression of his playing. In my clip collection I have fragment of this aria. Welcome!
dorje1975 4 years ago
Tells it all really. Amazing artist and great great singer.
cyfieithydd 4 years ago
The comment above tells so much!
greve 5 years ago
The first time I heard Vickers live was as Florestan in Chicago, in 1981. How his voice echoed through the Lyric Opera House during that "Gott" is forever etched on my memory, as well as his extraordinary artistry. The two combined to bring tears to my eyes. We shall not see his like again.
stevevandien 5 years ago
To Steveandien: Interesting you say that... I have the same recollection of his voice ringing in my ears "during that Gott" after I heard him in a concert version of Fidelio in San Juan, PR in 1971.
lungdoc 4 years ago
We each heard a great artist at his best, despite ten years' passing -- I feel so fortunate to have heard Vickers live in this performance, as well as in his Parsifal five years later -- would that I could have heard his Otello, Tristan and Peter Grimes (all of which I heard on recordings, some live) in person as well:) --
stevevandien 4 years ago