The correct call is actually 'no-let'. In this situation Ashour was in fact just clear of the ball's path and there wasn't any contact. Its kind of a 'fishing for a stroke' call. However, to prevent a player from playing a dangerous ball in the future, the ref almost always will grant a let. Good call by the ref.
Ashour was right. Darwish was hoping for the stroke call. He would not have hit Ashour had he played the ball. It was very close though and its best to play safe. Technically its a 'no-let' but 'yes-let' is the best call.
If karim would have hit Ramy, the ball would be heading for the sidewall. Let is a good call I think!
lorenzooow 2 years ago
The correct call is actually 'no-let'. In this situation Ashour was in fact just clear of the ball's path and there wasn't any contact. Its kind of a 'fishing for a stroke' call. However, to prevent a player from playing a dangerous ball in the future, the ref almost always will grant a let. Good call by the ref.
Monkey200728 3 years ago
ive got this match
Irishidotsquashgod 3 years ago
Darwish thought it was a stroke. Ashour thought it was a no-let.
goshensquash 4 years ago
Ashour was right. Darwish was hoping for the stroke call. He would not have hit Ashour had he played the ball. It was very close though and its best to play safe. Technically its a 'no-let' but 'yes-let' is the best call.
Monkey200728 3 years ago
wow when both players think its a stroke...the ref must be retarded. or he wants to save face so he doesn't change his decision.
phenom00v 4 years ago
Both guys thought it was a stroke...which it was.
dawgdrummer 4 years ago