Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
Immediately after 9/11 the conventional wisdom was that the jet fuel had melted the steel. NBC, CNN, NOVA, Fox News, and BBC all said so, and quoted a variety of "experts" on the subject. Of course this was nonsense. Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. For more information see my video: The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 8 months ago
Comment removed
punxsutawneybarney 8 months ago
Here's my impression of you, retard: "Duh, me sprayed lighter fluid on the con-crete, and it done burned for just ten sekonds. But then me sprayed lighter fluid on a tree and it done burned for an hour. Duh, it must be magikal lighter fluid, bekause why would it burn longer and hotter one time than the other? Me go shoot myself now."
skipelowe 1 year ago
Dumbass, the jet fuel was only the ignition agent. The heat of the fire was caused by the plastics, wood, paper, furniture, insulation materials, walls, carpets, humans, and other materials that were set on fire BY the jet fuel. Fucking IDIOT.
skipelowe 1 year ago 2
Not 24 hours after & they're saying fire did it? Both towers *explode* within a half an hour of each other, each one falling exactly the same in about 10 seconds, & they've already figured out that *fire* caused it without a proper investigation? Oh yeah, & let's not even mention Building 7, the other skyscraper that fell down in 6 seconds. And let's not mention all the people who heard, felt, and saw explosions just seconds before all 3 buildings went down. Go back to sleep Amerika. Sleep...
SteveM818 3 years ago