why you should have sex before you get married

[jayantasodekar]

jrj4u.com

[ncfwhitetigress]

i saw that coming A MILE AWAY

[ry4n36]

hey i had a fun 30 seconds but i want a divorice...

[javi0880]

that freaking scares me.

[86728miller]

lmfao nice i like that it funny lol xD

[swimchick1415]

wow what a debate we have going here.....you guys should stop arguing and realize how cute and funny the video is...

[fasqnjazera22]

WOW....... that is something you should tell a person..... especially if ur going to get married!

[BeanBuzzer]

If that happened to me I would try to work through it because that's what god would want me to do. Suckin dick and getting rimmed forever...I guess?

[hunthell]

Gd wouldn't want a man to marry a half-man...That within itself is essentially a sin...

A man and a woman come together in holy matrimony, not a man and...well...half a woman.

2 dicks - NO

A dick and a vagina - YES

2 vaginas - thats what a bachelor party is for

[ovid4corinna]

who asked you?

[hunthell]

it was a reply to something. i forget what now since its been a little bit.

[jamilziadhamza]

i dont get it......

[shesxlostxcontrol80]

his wife turned out to not be a girl, but actually a guy and he realized this when she peed. if they had sex before marriage he wouldnt have married her

[ccoraxfan]

Actually, if he had gotten to know «her» at all, he would have known that «she» was actually a he.

[lisyxoxo]

lol

[ccoraxfan]

Since marriage actually begins with sex, not "I do", I don't think it's possible to have sex before marriage...

[shesxlostxcontrol80]

that logic makes no sense

[ccoraxfan]

Marriage is an institution originally ordained by God, and God says that sex unites a couple in marriage. It's called consummating the marriage. I don't believe the Government has the right to define marriage, which they try to do anyway, calling it a contract between two people. To me that's just a "civil union" and not marriage.

[shesxlostxcontrol80]

true, the government shouldnt define marriage, they just do a civil union for anyone.

[bestmarty]

Which is why i don't see why gays can't be married

[ccoraxfan]

Gays can get married just like everybody else. They just don't want to, because they only like people of the same sex. And those who are pushing for «gay marriage» are actually asking to have marriage redefined. Marriage is, and has only ever been between a man and a woman.

[bestmarty]

Only in some states can gays get married and even then it keeps changing because of religious nuts who think its immoral or sinful or against god for two people of same sex to be married

and BTW, marriage should be redefined to just "the union of two people"

i really don't see what bothers the people who are so against it, they're just getting married, it doesn't affect them in the slightest

[ccoraxfan]

NO, gays can marry in all states. If a gay man wants to marry a woman, he can, and likewise a lesbian can marry a man. There is no prohibition!

What you are talking about is civil unions, not marriage. As I said, gays don't want marriage, they want to redefine marriage.

What bothers us is that we do not want to see marriage sullied and destroyed by people who would redefine it. So you want to contract with another person to share your stuff? Fine, but don't call it marriage.

[bestmarty]

Are you being fucking retarted?!?!?!?! gays are gay and they want to marry other gay people of the same sex as them. Give me one logical and legit reason why they shouldn't be allowed to do that and call it marriage (and no "because it is unholy" is not an accepted answer)

[ccoraxfan]

Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. I know of no gays who want that, so why do they want to redefine marriage? Jealousy? No, homosexuals do not practice normal sexual relations, and they do not need to have their abnormal behavior legitimized by tearing down the foundations of our society.

[bestmarty]

If i may quote you "God says that sex unites a couple in marriage." never specified that it had to be a man and a women

and also this isn't abnormal behavior animals also practice homosexual acts

and how is it tearing down the foundation of society????

All they want is to be treated like everyone else but people like you keep putting them down like they are some sort of freak

[ccoraxfan]

I never said that it had to be a man and a woman because that is the definition of marriage. I shouldn't have to define marriage every time I mention it.

We are not animals, and not even animals do the things homosexuals do.

The foundation of society is marriage and family. That is where civilization starts. You cannot redefine sexual perversion as normal and expect to maintain an ordered society.

The things which homosexuals do are freakish. I cannot condone that behavior, because it is sin.

[bestmarty]

Why is it a sin tell me?

(BTW I'm not gay i just feel that people should be treated equally)

Plus i have a bunch of gay friends who, last time i checked, haven't been summoning Satan in their spare time

[ccoraxfan]

It's a sin because the God who created sex said that sex between two men is an abomination, and even sex between two women is going against nature. (See for yourself: Leviticus 18:22, 20:13; Romans 1:26,27)

Of course it is also simply contrary to nature and contributes absolutely nothing to society.

[UrviSinha1]

Hey i respect your opinion about gay union and ur choice to not call it a marriage but i would just to through some light on this issue and hope u will understand somethings out of it.

Today a man and a woman is allowed to live together without marriage and even have kids and in some case kill their own kids because they dont like them any more or they can't afford taking care of them.

[UrviSinha1]

Gay people dont do such a thing. Infact a lot of gay couples adopt children to complete their family, thus they actually correct a mistake of a straight couple.

Marriage is known to be sacred but we straight people have done so much of worse things to spoil it. People cheat on each other after marriage, they hit each other, they abuse each other and then they divorce each other. If you thing still a union of gay people should not be called a marriage, you really need to think over again.

[ccoraxfan]

Just because straight people do evil things is no excuse to allow homosexuals special rights to do evil things. Marriage is society's approval of the union between a man and a woman. Homosexual marriage is society approving of sexual perversion. The reason homosexual marriage is not being accepted is because society does not approve! Why are homosexuals going through the courts trying to override the will of the people? Because they know people don't approve. This is not legitimate.

[ovid4corinna]

...what he/she knows is wrong. If you're talking about looking at child porn, then that's obviously not as bad as actually committing an assault themselves, but often the child in the picture is being assaulted which is partly why looking at it/enjoying it is wrong. Moving on to more than one spouse - this is more difficult because I don't know anyone in that situation. I would imagine that it is difficult to maintain such relationships without jealousy and other related problems.

[SnapeAngel]

@ovid4corinna 'looking at child porn, than that's obviously not as bad as acutally committing an assault' WTF? it's JUST as bad if not worse because it is encouraging those who HARMED those children by making that smut to make more and your a sick bastard for watching it!!

[ovid4corinna]

...It would seem that relationships work better when only two people are involved. And yes, we should allow 'those who don't do any harm to do as they like'. What's wrong with it if it doesn't hurt anybody? I thought that this was exactly the point we were debating - whether or not homosexual relationships are harmful? Or do you think that they are not harmful but shouldn't be allowed anyway?...

[ovid4corinna]

It's just a label. If you don't think that gay people can have a real 'marriage' then why not just let them call it that? Personally, I don't care what it's called - labels are unhelpful anyway. I just want everyone to have the same rights.

[ccoraxfan]

They have the same rights! Marriage is between a man and a woman. Homosexuals are either men or women, and they have the same right to marry a member of the opposite sex. They don't want *same rights*, they want *special rights*, namely the right to be married to a member of the *same sex*, which has never been a right at any time in history that I know of, and I'd love to hear of an example of it.

[ovid4corinna]

Yes, a homosexual has the right to marry someone of the opposite sex - but why would they want to do that? Homosexuals don't have the same rights because they don't have the right to marry the person they love, who loves them back. That's what the whole fight is about. It doesn't affect you. Why not let people love?

[ccoraxfan]

That argument works equally well for pedophiles, zoophiles, and bigamists/polygamists who want to love children, animals, and more than one spouse, respectively. So why not just let everybody love who they want? Or maybe it's not quite so simple as that.

[ovid4corinna]

And here we realise that any apparant logic I may have thought you had is, in fact, non-existant. A pedophile does not love children. A pedophile damages and abuses children - you don't abuse the people that you love. How can you compare two loving, consenting adults having sex to abuse? That is just plain stupid.

[ccoraxfan]

Funny how of all the paraphilias I listed, you chose to focus only on pedophilia. What of the rest? Okay, fine, I'll argue that with you.  You are over-generalizing. Not all pedophiles damage or abuse children, and not all consenting adult relationships are loving. So why not allow those who don't do any harm to do as they like? Also why shouldn't we ban all abusive or harmful adult relationships as well? That would include many homosexual relationships.

[asianwannabeamerican]

Finally, I've found someone who realizes that homosexuality is purely sexual perversion on the ultimate level. It's physically impossible to love someone who is the same sex. Thank you for getting it right and seeing through the lies of the homosexual community. Being gay is a gateway to sexual crimes b/c it shows that you'd do anything (or anybody) to get some.

[carrotjuse]

Dude, you don't have a clue!

[asianwannabeamerican]

i guess i don't :) i've actually been more "open-minded" and accepting of people's choice. however, a lot of people are so supportive of gay marriage/rights etc. that they attack others for not being gay themselves. some even think that gays are the only people that should marry. THAT would be wrong.

[CuddlyFurbie]

You hit the nail on the head.

[ovid4corinna]

I suppose it depends how you define 'love' and how you define 'relationship'. To me, a loving, sexual relationship is between two consenting adults. I don't think it's possible to have a romantic relationship with a dog. A dog isn't emotionally capable. Neither, for that matter, are children, though that is far from being the main reason why having sex with children is wrong. A paedophile who doesn't damage or abuse children deserves respect for fighting against the urge to do...

[TheYokokuramalover]

@ovid4corinna they think (the pedophile and in some cases the victim) consider it to be thir forrbidden love

[ovid4corinna]

...Banning abusive or harmful relationships is not a good idea, but not because those kinds of relationships are good. Who could enforce such a 'ban'? The government? Do you really want other, corrupt people (most people are corrupt. In fact, I never met anyone who'd never done a thing wrong) involving themselves in your relationships? Lots of abuse is against the law - you can't hit someone, or rape your spouse or whatever...

[carrotjuse]

ccoraxfan, an example would be certain native American tribes, Navaho, Mohave, Zuni, Lakota Sioux & others, who revered gay men as gifted people with double souls. and who allowed them to choose the men they wanted to marry. They functioned as wives and healers and were afforded great respect. Look it up. There are other examples throughout history, if you'd read books.

[carrotjuse]

Wrong, ccoraxfan. Get out the dictionary, if you can find one, and look up the word "berdache." The definition will surprise you.

[1hotshordi]

???????

[antmjc]

LMFAO

[MachineCinemaa]

i dont get it.........

[creia2008]

wow what a vid :D

[funnychick52]

ive seen tht b4.lol.funny

[diverqueen]

hahahahaha thats was soo funny love it

[ardnocz]

What is that music please

[vuetube]

Stolen from Bachelor Party scene

[JcGamer93]

nice, i never saw that coming, and he didnt either :)

[weegal]

XD Awweeesome :D

[buckleup4KB24]

So the women was actually a gay man?

[warmongers666]

nah. she was a man who went thru an INCOMPLETE transexual operation.

[daffer1234]

or.... shes just standing up and peeing....

[NeverAloneForever]

lol that ws funny!

[markay9tyfawr]

redneck gal ^^

[Lextazee]

ROFL. friken awesome

[stardingo747]

actually, chicks can piss standing up. I had to read a book once in High School about the vietnam war, and this dude said Vietnamese hookers pee standing up.

[xsecretofyoursx]

omgggg lol

[BADBASH]

wtf ?

[Tuff2Gong]

O.....M.....G!!! didn't see tat 1 coming!

[dlapinski]

i dont see it

[janethedirector]

Its funny.

[shadyparadox]

Seriously, who did NOT see that coming?

[JeZebeL2600]

me XD

[jemroper]

awesome ad

[linmayu]

HAHAHAHA!!! That totally made my day.

[crazystarf]

That was pretty fucking funny as hell!!

[DJP33D]

hahahaha tahts awesome!

[meveryrandom]

nasty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[holysinnerxxx]

*Silently vomits in mouth two times*