Michael Scheuer: Israel & Saudi Arabia Are Much More Dangerous Enemies To The US Than The Iran

[pretorious700]

This guy better watch his back. People speaking out truth like this usually end up dead.

[sssssjjjj1]

hey!!! judge nappy is really hammering the core of the system.

[Tsnore]

Thank you Fudge.

[percy1fan]

saudi arabia has nothing to do with this you moron!

[cavhoki]

the guy should be president

[aatayyab]

someone is still SANE in CIA. phew!!!

[lerch25]

Neopolitano is hinting that that the fast and the furious scandal is linked to the fbi case against Iran, by playing the story back to back. It makes perfect sense to, the government bought the Mexican cartels cooperation in framing the Iranians with a sweet weapons deal. We are badly in need of regime change in this country!

[lawrencebanes]

I just watched Fox. I feel dirty now. Did I just witness M. Schauer name the jew?

[TheGenseric]

No one is flooding Africa with Jewish lobbyists, pushing programs of national destruction and saying, "Whatever you do, don't protest, especially the nationalists. "No one is flooding China with Jewish lobbyists, pushing programs of national destruction and saying, "Whatever you do, don't protest, especially the nationalists." Of course not, the people who say these things ONLY say them about EVERY White and ONLY White countries. They claim anti-racist. Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

[leemil4]

What @TheGenseric said.

[helix4811]

@TheGenseric

I don't agree with that, I believe every people have a racist ideology. In South Asia, white people aren't well liked, in Africa, Indians and Chinese aren't well liked, in Europe and North America, Africans and Indians aren't well liked, so every nation has racism in it.

I would say being anti-Racist is being anti-Racist, whether it is against white or black peoples.

If I saw a black person make fun of a white person because of skin color, I would call that racism.

[87fg]

You just contradicted yourself with that statement. Whites are not liked for a reason. It is called imperialism, which that have imposed on most of the globe. Yes, ethnic tension is present in society all over the globe, but whites are the most hateful. There is no such thing as a global anti-white conspiracy.

[helix4811]

@87fg How did I contradict myself?None the less,I will rephrase my comment,I don't agree with the statement "anti racist is code word for anti-white"and different people are racist to different ethnicity's,not just one single race.Speaking out against racism isn't the same thing as speaking out against a certain ethnicity.Your comment that "whites are the most hateful" has no real bases.There is no study that suggest this, but if it's personal experience,then I would say go to another continent.

[87fg]

America removed Native Americans and brought over African slaves for cash crop production. The Holocuast was carried out by white Germans and resulted in the deaths of milllions. England, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain went around the globe killing and conquering non-white people.White supremacy has killed more people than anything else in history.

[helix4811]

@87fg

(continue)

Also, you forget that Africans were actually the biggest slave traders during colonial times (Jamaica was considered the biggest slave market in the world, at the time, with African Jamaicans being majority of the slave traders there). The Turks enslaved whites, the Arabs enslaved blacks, the blacks enslaved south Asians. The Chinese enslaved everyone.

Every people have committed atrocities, not just whites.

[87fg]

Europeans benefited more economically from the slave trade than the Arabs or Turks. The Spanish and the Portugese would have never been successful in the colonization of the Americas without slave labor. Brazil was the largest importer of slaves. While Europe advanced through this brutality, they would eventually overtake the Ottomans, Indians , and Chinese.

[helix4811]

@87fg

Does this excuse the others though? Slave trade was everywhere, and everyone is equally guilty, not just white people.

[87fg]

@helix4811 that does excuse everyone. Slavery and other forms of exploitation have been a part of society, but that does not make it ethical. White supremacy however, has had devastating effects on the world.

[helix4811]

@87fg

Of course it doesn't make it ethical, and it doesn't excuse everyone who was involved.A person who kills one man is equally guilty as someone who kills a thousand.Both are murderers, one just happens to be more efficient at it.I think this is where the argument ends.This fundamental difference of philosophy between us seems to force both of us to disagree with one another.We both seem to agree on the base that slavery is bad, just not who is to blame and how much of the blame they deserve.

[87fg]

@helix4811 "white supremacy is bad, but not the worst" that quote is just ludicrous. Look at all the wars waged on non-whites and there is your proof. Iraq was attacked by the Western powers both in 1991 and 2003. Libya was attacked by Western powers in 1981, 1986, and 2011. Indochina was continuously attacked by the French and Americans from 1954 to 1975. All the Vietnamese wanted was a nation free from white colonial domination.

[87fg]

@helix4811 an anit-racist you are not. Telling me to go to another country because of my skin color is a backward and ignorant view. Whites treat non-whites atrociously. The Iraq War and the Afghan War are two of numerous examples. Yes, whites are the most hateful and history proves it.

[helix4811]

@87fg

I think you misunderstood my last sentence, what I meant was, if it is from personal experience, then go to another continent and see how the people over there think. Nowhere did I mention your skin color.

What about the Armenian genocide, the massacre in Bangladesh, not to mention the massacres carried out in Africa, such as Rwanda.

History is filled with lies, it has always been and always will be distorted to fit the needs of those who want to see things a certain way.

[TheGenseric]

@helix4811 Okay...But, in reality everyone can see that those who IDENTIFY themselves as 'anti-racists' are nothing but anti-White. ONLY Whites are targeted for genocide through MASSIVE immigration, forced integration/assimilation, and advertisement of intermarriage. They disguise it as Morality and DIEversity. Yet, only WHITE children are left struggling how to cope with this insanity.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white/

anti-racist IS a code word for anti-white

[helix4811]

@TheGenseric

Actually, that isn't the fault of the immigrants at all. If you look at what happened after world war 2, the European nations and the Americas needed unskilled laborers to help rebuild their economies.

The problem with your argument is, it doesn't look at the other side. Do you think it is easy for immigrants to come to a new country and leave their entire lives behind? They spend a fortune to come and try to have a better life and leave everything they knew behind.

[helix4811]

@TheGenseric

(continue)

It is not the white people who're forced to integrate or assimilate, it is the immigrants. Tell me, did you have to change the way you live because an immigrant didn't like the way you lived? No, and usually it is the other way around. Immigrants have had to cope with culture shock, which forces them to either go back to their own country (I've seen it happen) or try and adjust to their new country of choosing.Look at Canada, I have Black, White, Brown, Asian friends and

[helix4811]

@TheGenseric

(continue)

only 2 (maybe 3, if the Black family were new immigrants and not naturally born) of them have had to make changes to their lives.If a white person went to China, they would have to adjust to their surroundings, not the other way around (no matter how much Chinese, who think similar to you -only with Chinese people instead of White people- will complain.). It is already happening, look at Dubai, the majority of the pop there is white.Do you think the Arabs should complain?

[87fg]

@helix4811 I'm not saying that that other races have not commited acts of brutality. It is clear that whites have commited the most. Christopher Columbus, Francisco Pizarro, and Hernan Cortes caused the death and destruction of the native population. Millions died from European diseases and conquest.

[helix4811]

@87fg

The problem with your argument is that you still can't prove whites are teh most devastating. Like I said, history is distorted, not only that but the fact that no study shows that whites are the most worst gives you no proof, and as long as you have no credible proof, you have no argument.

All you have are events that happen to involve white people, which can be called nothing more than a coincidence. White supremacy is bad, but it's not the worst.

[87fg]

@helix4811 yes I have provided proof. Europeans and Americans developed eugenics with the sole purpose of "proving" that non-whites were inferior. During the 19th century to early 20th century this pseudoscience was having an impact on public policy and resulted in mass serialization programs. The victims were not only non-whites, but the mentally ill and disabled.

[helix4811]

@87fg

No, all you've provided is a set of events that just happen to involve white people. You've only provided wars that involved white people, what about one that didn't? Rwanda was the first example I gave, what about the Armenian massacre? The Iran-Iraq war (the US was involved, but it was Iraq who sought the US's help), what about Sudan civil war? Go back before the british empire and even during its time, you'll find that white people weren't as involved as you claim.

[helix4811]

@87fg

(continue)

Iraq was attack by the US only after it invaded another Arab nation. I tend to believe that the first gulf war was conducted under false pretenses, but it was the Arabs that were against Iraq that used the US to attack Iraq (see the Saud Nasir al-Sabah and his daughter.).You're being very selective in your so called 'proofs' and that is hurting your argument.

Look, I think it's best to end this topic, I'm getting bored. You aren't going to be convinced and neither will I.

[87fg]

@helix4811 the British Empire harmed more people than Saddam. Uganda, India, Burma, and Ghana suffered immensly under British rule. I'm not being selective, I am telling the truth.

[87fg]

@helix4811 The US, Britain, France, and Soviet Russia provided Saddam with chemical and biological weapons. Worst of all the US was arming both sides of the conflict (Iran-Contra Scandal).

[helix4811]

@87fg

No, you're being selective. The Sudanese civil war cost roughly 3 million. You can say that the US was selling weapons, but who was using them?

Look, let's just end this subject.

[87fg]

@helix4811 it is clear that you do not understand how racism and white supremacy work. During the era of British rule of Sudan, they expolited the ancient hatreds of Arab and Africans.

[87fg]

@helix4811 Sudan was balkanized with the intent to exploit their oil. By manipulating ethnic tension between Arabs and the Dinka the West can advance its own goals in the region.

[helix4811]

@87fg

Don't insult me, I know exactly how racism and white supremacy work, I am a victim of it.

Now you're just speculating. nothing more. Like I said, let's end this subject, this is pointless now.

[87fg]

@helix4811 How are you a vicitim? Are you a white person? That is the truth about Sudan and it in the legacy of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudanese colony (1899-1956). Divide and conquer has always been policy.

[helix4811]

@87fg

I am a victim of racism, I never mentioned my skin color, you're assuming that I am.You can say it is the truth all you want, but you have nothing to show for it. You're speculating, nothing more. Divide and conquer is the policy of every military power, not just white nations. Every nation is guilty of it, it was "Sun Tzu" who wrote this, a non-white person, way before any Anglo nation ever came to power.I am going to repeat, let's end this discussion, you obviously don't see eye to eye.

[87fg]

@helix4811 history does not lie. The atrocities are numerous. You know the US and UN continued sanctions on Iraq in the 1990's, even though it was harming civillians. Alot of children died because of the use of depleted uranium used in shells by the coalition. Do you think that would have been done to a European nation?Well the answer is no. White supremacy has caused more havoc across globe.

[helix4811]

@87fg

History is written by the victor, thus it is filled with lies and exaggerations. You haven't commented or disproved my examples, because you can't. As such, it seems apparent that you know very little about the subject of racism.

I was trying to be nice and end this conversation before it got to the point of insults, which you've clearly started to do, now though, it's gloves off.

You have a one track mind, you see everything through a single dimension, by blaming only white people.

[87fg]

@helix4811 you mentioned the first Gulf War the West reacted because of Saddam's aggression. Kuwait was slant drilling oil on Iraqi territory which provoked a military response from Iraq. The West could have used the UN to mediate between Saddam and King Jaber Al-Sabah, but instead they chose war. The worst part is they convinced the Saudis the US bases had to be established and they are there to this day.

[87fg]

@helix4811 racism is an ideology that states a certain race is superior to others. I have not preached or practiced this. Western society however, has a long history of bigotry. There were numerous pogroms throughout Europe during the Middle Ages. Antisemitism was prevalent in Western society. Today Eastern Europe still holds bigoted views of Jews and discriminates against the Roma (Gypsy) population.

[helix4811]

@87fg

None of what you say makes sense, it's entirely subjective. You're connecting things that have nothing to do with each other, it is pointless to talk to you.

I will no longer reply, simply because of your foolish behavior. You really know nothing about racism, so as far as I'm concerned, you're nothing more than a fool. By the way, racism is an ideology that state the hatred of another ethnicity because of skin color, which you're clearly doing. You're excusing everyone but white people.

[87fg]

@helix4811 no it's history. The Gulf Wars and Western hypocrisy in foreign policy is just of an example of white supremacy in action. You are blind to the way imperalism is an extension of racism. I do not hate white people. Then again I cannot expect much from a person who cannot figure out that TheGenseric is clearly antisemitic. Helix4811 you know nothing about the struggle of non-whites to gain human rights.

[87fg]

@helix4811 the definition of racism is "a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others." I have no hate for white people. Now answer my question what racism have you faced? Let me guess, none because you benefit from white privilege.

[helix4811]

@87fg

I'm not white, idiot, only gonna answer this. The fact that you think that I'm white because I'm defending them, shows your hidden hatred for them.

Good bye.

[87fg]

@helix4811 so are you saying you are complicit with white supremacy? To me it seems you are. I do not hold any "hidden hatred." I want to see the liberation of the Third World from European control.

[helix4811]

@87fg

(continue)

I can see now that you're a racist, because you place all your hate and blame on white people. Your very argument that racism is bad is contradicted by your claim that white people are to blame for all of the worlds problems, this shows an inherent lack of objectivity on your part. Your arguments are subjective, nothing more, because history is interpreted differently by different peoples. No one knows true history, as such, you're inherently wrong.

[87fg]

@helix4811 calling me racist is ridiculous. I have just pointed out history of European domination of the world. The only thing I bame white people for is white supremacy. I can disprove your examples easily. You mentioned the Armenian Genocide, but failed to mention the German role (mostly complicity and condoning acts of violence). Germany did not want to anger its World War I ally and it wanted the Berlin- Baghdad railway completed with the help of the Ottomans.

[87fg]

@helix4811 no you don't. White privilege is still prevalent in society. One example is the harsh treatment of emigrants in the Western world. You live in a glass house devoid of reality.Yes, dividing people has been the tactic by various empires in history,but the British took it to another level.

[cancer19850624]

Holy Jesus Christ, I can't believe this on FOX.

Thumb up if you agree!

[inhuman0id]

@cancer19850624 Thumbs UP!

[MikeMths35]

@cancer19850624 Fox Business Network is not the same as the Fox News channel, I think Fox Business has designed a strategy of pandering to Old Right/PaleoCon Pat Buchanan fans and anti-NWO Alex Jones fans in the hope that these folks who won't watch the regular NeoCon Fox News channel will watch Fox Business. If this is true then it is a pretty wise strategy and is already yielding some good results.

[cancer19850624]

@MikeMths35

I did not know that, but are they owned by the same owner, i.e. Rupert Murdoch?

[MikeMths35]

@cancer19850624 Yes, they have the same owner but I think they figured out that there was no incentive for regular NeoCon Fox fans to change the channel from Fox News to Fox Business so they've decided to have them differ in some respects, I get the feeling that they want to appeal to Old Right and Alex Jones types as this is an audience which is not liberal and thus will not watch CNN or MSNBC so they'd be the ideal demographic to win over to watch the Fox Business channel.

[CodeRedInstrumentals]

@cancer19850624 this is the on excerpt on fox that i watch. FREEDOM WATCH!!!

[ricktoven2]

Elect Ron Paul.

[tracycolorado]

TRUTH 

[jnixongo00]

WE NEED TO MIND OUR OWN BUSINESS WE ARE NOT THE WORLD POLICE... DEAR CONGRESS AND MR PREZ DO YOUR JOB AT HOME FIRST AND STOP BEING SO DAMN CHARITABLE WIT OUR TAX DOLLARS...

[westchesterny]

@jnixongo00 since around 1960 population went from 225M to 310M with much immigration very calculated to effect the society in certain ways (1965 borders Act against public will in 1965, clearly was intended to bring immigrants of radically different experience from northern european founders who adhere to the u.s. constititution. Obviously, if one tampers with votes by using immigration, to the tune of 100M, the country would destabilize. ppl who can't think and negotiate police and bully

[wbradss]

Nail on the head 10-4 Michael Scheuer TRUE Patriot

[wbradss]

Nail on the head 10-4

[Intervene]

wow surprised they didnt cut him off!

[1ASHKENAZI]

Israel is NOT worth an American LIFE NOR AN AMERICAN DOLLAR. Im tired of wars