Added: 3 years ago
From: hondawiki
Views: 6,509
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I really like both cars. Both are great. Bit the obeying I never could get my mind around is how they always compare a v6 with a 4cyl. The s2 - 350.

  • NSX power

  • Hate how all the way they talk including the announcer..these guys are lame..Power talks BS walks...wow..did they like get that from teenager.. But great cars unfair advantage..

  • S2000's actually get the same gas mileage as 350z's lol. 18 city and 25 hwy. I have owned an s2000 and gas mileage isn't that great but the car is definetly fun. Both cars have their pros and cons but compensate for it. For example the s2000 is light but lacks torque and the 350z is heavy but has a good amount of torque. The times are very close and IMO i would say they are equal because the driver defintely plays a role in the times.

  • derrrrr 350z got best engine cuz its gots more displacement uhuhuhuh

    what can you do to either engine before they blow up? that should be the test

  • CR rocks!!

    

  • S2000 CR!

  • "The engine goes to the Nisomo because it has extra 69 horses blahblahblah...."

    Wow that's very american lol

    If you know about the engines, you can easily tell which is the better motor.

  • @kensukeyokota with the extra money that I save buying the S I can put 400+ hp in the S engine and beat the Z, not too smart now, are u?

  • Honda hands down. 350z's are owned by every teenage wannabe drifter. Honda's are a no compromise class, and its just really fun to go sideways with.

  • They forgot price, which would have gone to the S2000. You save 4 grand, and spend it on little power and handling goodies, then let's see who will win.

  • Fuk 350Z I beat 350 turbo with my S2000, those pieces of shit r worthless...

  • @S2000F20CVTEC No you didnt..

  • I choose the CR because it closer fit my philosophy of driving. I spent track time in a 350 Nismo too, it just didn't fit my driving style. Needless to say it's an amazing machine as well, I just personally preferred the CR. Either is more car than 99% of the public can use on a track unless they race, so assuming one is "better" is a misunderstanding of the basics of performance driving. Oh, the CR can be had with radio/AC, so it's just as useful as the Z.

  • no doubt both cars are phenomenal to drive, and a few tenths wont matter out on the street when ur just having fun. but i think something significant they left out was the cr's lack of a/c and a radio. the cr is no doubt the more bare bones car which can be issue when it comes to usabilty. love em both though. definitely 2 cars i wanna own

  • Idk about you guys but Personally I would pick the S2000 atm. For 4 Grand less You get a 4cylinder car thats 760 pounds less and is 0.4th second less. Imo the drivers play a factor in the tenths of a second.

    Plus all those the add up the mpg

    and idk about u guys but i know i like more mpg :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more