@HMSBeagle200 Huh? Clark was more strategic. He knew Rome was the main prize. Alexander was just mucking about with pointless small objectives like Cassino.
Cassino was truly a team effort. The Germans defended well and bravely. The Poles (4 battle), Americans (1 battle) and New Zealanders (2 + 3 battle) fought well. Each attack hurt the German defenders. Don't forget the French effort in breaking through. Clark and Alexander both did a good job. Clark was more strategic. He knew this battle was about who would be the great conqueror of Rome. History shows Clark as being the great victor.
Cassino was truly a team effort. FACT The Germans defended well and bravely. FACT The Poles (4 battle), Americans (1 battle) and New Zealanders (2 + 3 battle) fought well. FACT
Each attack hurt the German defenders. FACT Don't forget the French effort in breaking through. FACT
Clark and Alexander both did a good job. Clark was more strategic. He knew this battle was about who would be the great conqueror of Rome. History shows Clark as being the great victor.
@swanningaround " Clark was more strategic." As english is not my first language, is the statement similar to "I know I'm hungry and have to eat but don't know how to cook"?
@HMSBeagle200 Huh? Clark was more strategic. He knew Rome was the main prize. Alexander was just mucking about with pointless small objectives like Cassino.
@HMSBeagle200 Huh? Clark was more strategic. He knew Rome was the main prize. Alexander was just mucking about with pointless small objectives like Cassino.
This has been flagged as spam show
@HMSBeagle200 Huh? Clark was more strategic. He knew Rome was the main prize. Alexander was just mucking about with pointless small objectives like Cassino.
swanningaround 6 days ago
Cassino was truly a team effort. The Germans defended well and bravely. The Poles (4 battle), Americans (1 battle) and New Zealanders (2 + 3 battle) fought well. Each attack hurt the German defenders. Don't forget the French effort in breaking through. Clark and Alexander both did a good job. Clark was more strategic. He knew this battle was about who would be the great conqueror of Rome. History shows Clark as being the great victor.
swanningaround 3 years ago
I don't know where yout getting your information, but must military historians completely disagree with you
2bn442RCT 3 years ago
Why?
Cassino was truly a team effort. FACT The Germans defended well and bravely. FACT The Poles (4 battle), Americans (1 battle) and New Zealanders (2 + 3 battle) fought well. FACT
Each attack hurt the German defenders. FACT Don't forget the French effort in breaking through. FACT
Clark and Alexander both did a good job. Clark was more strategic. He knew this battle was about who would be the great conqueror of Rome. History shows Clark as being the great victor.
HISTORIANS DIFFER
swanningaround 3 years ago
@swanningaround " Clark was more strategic." As english is not my first language, is the statement similar to "I know I'm hungry and have to eat but don't know how to cook"?
HMSBeagle200 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HMSBeagle200 Huh? Clark was more strategic. He knew Rome was the main prize. Alexander was just mucking about with pointless small objectives like Cassino.
swanningaround 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HMSBeagle200 Huh? Clark was more strategic. He knew Rome was the main prize. Alexander was just mucking about with pointless small objectives like Cassino.
swanningaround 6 days ago