Try pausing this video at 0:10 and in a separate window play "Europa-Globus" (both vids need to be played at the same time). That song + this is EPIC.
while nato would have the technology, the USSR would have the firepower. i think if would happened in real life it would ether stalemate or USSR would win by the skin of there teeth.
@Demon5I7 No they may have the man power, but you gotta remember. ALL of western Europe + America = Russia out gunned, and even with all those countries the manpower would equal Russia's. Yes Russia is HUGE but so is Western Europe, there is no way they could have won, the deck is stacked against them.
I dunno why people are arguing over the USSR and the USA, because the USA didn't have to fire a single rocket for the USSR to meet its end; it destroyed itself with Communism..
CCCP had 45.000 nuclear ICBM rockets in '89. With 30 9Mt rocket could the russians destroy whole america with his NORAD and rocket defense, and sawyer and parker and everything... So if wic was true, then we dont sit and talk here about the shitty tanks and pittifull military.
IF WIC was true, the Soviets didnt' believe that could launch their ICBM fleet without losing most of it to the US-SDI system, which is why the Russians were pushing so hard for Ft. Teller, the Supposed Home of the Strategic Defense Initiative ground control center.
oh please...the story is about that, this is true...great story, yes.But its great to that the soviet SS 18 satan ICBM is undestroyeble cause a new "drop" technologie. So technicly , the story is inpossible.
We are talking of the SS-18 Mod 5 carrying 10 750 Kt warheads? The SS-18 m 5, or the SS-18 mod 5 with the 8K69 FOBS system? there's one singular hole in that idea.
With the array of measures intended to kill ICBMs in ascent phase, and on orbit, fro X-ray laser systems, to KKVs and even the CHECMATE Railgun system, the SRF estimates would put the SS-18 launch potential, of 400 SS-18s up, and between 60-80% of them lost in the ascent, or midcourse ( before the FOBS orbit) to be a waste.
@SoviPaPa But the Russians didn't know that, they believe that the US-SDI or "Star wars" was real which it wasn't. So if the thought a fake defense was real of course they will think their best missile wont work.
@SoviPaPa the nuclear weapon is the most useless weapon ever created. You cannot use it for conquest (you destroy the enemy, the territory, the enviroment, everything) and if you use it for defense (as shown in wic) it's as a last, absolutly desperate option of avoiding a greater disaster. Nuclear weapons only work for stoping killing asteroids and stoping more world wars. You see, in wic, even with a world war, nato and russians don't use nuclear weapons. They're just too terrifying
I dont think we can honestly find out who would win the Warsaw pact vs NATO engagment, only that europe would never be the same again.
Especially since parts of NATO pretty much realised it was a huge missmatch in terms of strength, hence NATO for units in germany being effectivly speedbumps. Speedbumbs with suicide missions, like how the RAF was given the job of one way missions against forward airbases.
Bahahahaha, OMFG LOLZ. Russian AK-74's have a less likely chance of jamming than an M4 Carbine lol. Russian T-90's have better mileage than M2 Abrams as well as a slightly (9% more) stronger gun. Russia is pretty good..
Russia, would have a hard time fighting on alot of side's, Its a scenario we'd have to see to believe. No doubt Russia would up a hell of a fight(Su-37's), But its one of those things.
so hard to choose! i love America of course but i also like the look and feel of russia's military, but at the same time NATO is also cool! fuck it, im goin' uncle sam on some communist sons a bitches!!!
lol have you seen the vidio of a NATO expladintionary force team try to fire a rocket LOL look for it its on here somwere as well as US marines getting stuck in quick sand straight of the boat LOL :P
Try pausing this video at 0:10 and in a separate window play "Europa-Globus" (both vids need to be played at the same time). That song + this is EPIC.
e0o9kii 3 months ago
we will send some Nazi Skinheads, they will take care of the whole fukken kommie russkie scheisse
tiborvivi 4 months ago
to be fair the whole of europe could kik fuck out of russia
chavhater223 1 year ago
@chavhater223
Europe was bankrupt, Russia was already in the strongest nation, Germany, whose Communist majority would side with Russia.
Britain? After 2 WW's, they're not doing anything.
Without USA help, Europe would be doomed in 1989.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
@RyanBrooksby i doubt it mind if europe went to war with the usa europe would win easily
chavhater223 1 month ago
@chavhater223
the fuck? why would Europe, an ally of USA and most nations in it are of NATO, go to war with USA?
There would be no economical benefit towards it, it'd just shatter economies...
I mean, with the USSR, why would Europe attack their ally instead?
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
lol who wants to conquer sweden full of Gays
NoobSnoopy 1 year ago 2
ein heller Schein am Firmament (one thing shining on sky , (nearly like that)) = ICBM , or :P !!!
rammlover18 1 year ago
yea , its definitly symbolic !!!
rammlover18 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAH , does the song Mein Herz Brennt have simbolic appinion ?! like ICBM or something , i mean it is from heart of russia :P !!!
rammlover18 1 year ago
while nato would have the technology, the USSR would have the firepower. i think if would happened in real life it would ether stalemate or USSR would win by the skin of there teeth.
Demon5I7 1 year ago
@Demon5I7 No they may have the man power, but you gotta remember. ALL of western Europe + America = Russia out gunned, and even with all those countries the manpower would equal Russia's. Yes Russia is HUGE but so is Western Europe, there is no way they could have won, the deck is stacked against them.
Jeremy429229 1 year ago
@Jeremy429229 im sure russia will have allies as well to help out, such as north korea.
Demon5I7 1 year ago
@Demon5I7 yeah cuz they"ll make a difference.
tyeabrzannn 1 year ago
@Jeremy429229
This is after WW2, Russia already has a foothold in Germany.
No, no they couldn't. European armies would've been overwhelmed.
USSR Army - 1.5 million
USA - 0.5 Million
So USA sent it's better-trained army under Truman to make sure WIC doesn't happen.
RyanBrooksby 1 month ago
0:00 russian has conquerd denmark,finland and some parts of jugoslavia whatta hell?
NoobSnoopy 2 years ago
@NoobSnoopy russians dont need to concure yugoslavia lol xD And danemark? they are just runned away :PP :))
SoviPaPa 1 year ago
@NoobSnoopy BOUT NOT SWEDEN YEA!!
CAPS LOCK WTF!!
88Tomm88 1 year ago
@NoobSnoopy Those countries would run before the Soviets came in man...
hal0dude7 9 months ago
philipineman eh t-90 better than Abrams ... no -.- u fucking russia lover US and the western powers would crush russia to the ground
Freedomfight94 2 years ago
@Freedomfight94
USA will have to do it alone if they dont stop interfering with European bissunis.
Kdssow 2 years ago
@Freedomfight94 ha ya right
visiblechunk 1 year ago
Whats the song at 2:26?
117Jorn 2 years ago
@117Jorn mein hertz brent
macanthegamer 2 years ago
I dunno why people are arguing over the USSR and the USA, because the USA didn't have to fire a single rocket for the USSR to meet its end; it destroyed itself with Communism..
dmitrikrenzchev2 2 years ago
CCCP had 45.000 nuclear ICBM rockets in '89. With 30 9Mt rocket could the russians destroy whole america with his NORAD and rocket defense, and sawyer and parker and everything... So if wic was true, then we dont sit and talk here about the shitty tanks and pittifull military.
SoviPaPa 2 years ago
IF WIC was true, the Soviets didnt' believe that could launch their ICBM fleet without losing most of it to the US-SDI system, which is why the Russians were pushing so hard for Ft. Teller, the Supposed Home of the Strategic Defense Initiative ground control center.
Dragonx0562 2 years ago
oh please...the story is about that, this is true...great story, yes.But its great to that the soviet SS 18 satan ICBM is undestroyeble cause a new "drop" technologie. So technicly , the story is inpossible.
SoviPaPa 2 years ago
We are talking of the SS-18 Mod 5 carrying 10 750 Kt warheads? The SS-18 m 5, or the SS-18 mod 5 with the 8K69 FOBS system? there's one singular hole in that idea.
With the array of measures intended to kill ICBMs in ascent phase, and on orbit, fro X-ray laser systems, to KKVs and even the CHECMATE Railgun system, the SRF estimates would put the SS-18 launch potential, of 400 SS-18s up, and between 60-80% of them lost in the ascent, or midcourse ( before the FOBS orbit) to be a waste.
Dragonx0562 2 years ago
@SoviPaPa But the Russians didn't know that, they believe that the US-SDI or "Star wars" was real which it wasn't. So if the thought a fake defense was real of course they will think their best missile wont work.
Jeremy429229 1 year ago
@SoviPaPa the nuclear weapon is the most useless weapon ever created. You cannot use it for conquest (you destroy the enemy, the territory, the enviroment, everything) and if you use it for defense (as shown in wic) it's as a last, absolutly desperate option of avoiding a greater disaster. Nuclear weapons only work for stoping killing asteroids and stoping more world wars. You see, in wic, even with a world war, nato and russians don't use nuclear weapons. They're just too terrifying
Empeinmortal 1 year ago
@SoviPaPa, If one side launched nukes then the other would launch them too, both could and would destroy each other.
thenoobfactor 1 year ago
@SoviPaPa have you ever heard of MAD?
tempoperdendo 5 months ago
I dont think we can honestly find out who would win the Warsaw pact vs NATO engagment, only that europe would never be the same again.
Especially since parts of NATO pretty much realised it was a huge missmatch in terms of strength, hence NATO for units in germany being effectivly speedbumps. Speedbumbs with suicide missions, like how the RAF was given the job of one way missions against forward airbases.
Greaselburger 2 years ago
Soviet had quantity, NATO and US had quality. But both sides were likely to win if it would be a war.
ThaSweKillah 3 years ago
nato not have nothing, russia have 30 tanks to 1
bachu2 3 years ago
40 tanks to 1 actually :)
PhilipineMan 3 years ago
And only 1 of 20 is realy working (also only 1 of 40 is really up to date). And the NATO ist best in ground defense.
ThomyThompson 2 years ago
You seriously underestimate the Russians for barbarians.
PhilipineMan 2 years ago
what? russians are good soldiers. their equipment is just crappy and not all is up to date
ThomyThompson 2 years ago
Bahahahaha, OMFG LOLZ. Russian AK-74's have a less likely chance of jamming than an M4 Carbine lol. Russian T-90's have better mileage than M2 Abrams as well as a slightly (9% more) stronger gun. Russia is pretty good..
End of discussion
PhilipineMan 2 years ago
29 cant ride and the last one is too old to be used in fights.
Dragunas17 2 years ago
Russia, would have a hard time fighting on alot of side's, Its a scenario we'd have to see to believe. No doubt Russia would up a hell of a fight(Su-37's), But its one of those things.
kite781 2 years ago
I think the NATO won because they have the best tanks of the world. Nice Vid
TroTLF 3 years ago 6
tanks mean nothing in a war between 2 nuclear capable nations. it was economics and technology.
Gormanmod 3 years ago
so hard to choose! i love America of course but i also like the look and feel of russia's military, but at the same time NATO is also cool! fuck it, im goin' uncle sam on some communist sons a bitches!!!
metraccobar 3 years ago
GOOOO RUSSIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
steamedmidget 3 years ago 10
Hell yeah! Now I wanna log on and kill some russians! Cool vid!
irishmanb1974 3 years ago
bring it own western piglet >:) you'll bury you alive, you lowlives!
skyraptor 3 years ago
Well im guessing your a russian fan killing nato cause nato has better weapons and tanks then russia even if russians have better choppers
Wackylackay 3 years ago
Haha my ass.
russianinja2008 3 years ago
lol have you seen the vidio of a NATO expladintionary force team try to fire a rocket LOL look for it its on here somwere as well as US marines getting stuck in quick sand straight of the boat LOL :P
shuggy1991 3 years ago
I donnow.I never seen hellboy.:P :)
SoviPaPa 3 years ago
oh wait nvm,only the beginning was...
That rock song is the themesong to Hellboy II O_O
Lach1234 3 years ago
russian national anthem?
Tomy0791 3 years ago
no, he means the Rammstein song :D
But it's only funny if you understand the text which obviously is in German :P
I suppose it is called "Mein Herz brennt" (My heart is burning), just in case you'd wnat to look for a translation :D
thelorrr 3 years ago
I know I'm german
Tomy0791 3 years ago
achso ich auch :D
thelorrr 3 years ago
rofl rofl wie geil so was gibt es nur auf youtube naja ich adde dich mal zu meiner friendsliste man findet hier so wenig deutsche
Tomy0791 3 years ago
lolz the song is good,it's the same song that plays when i play COD4 and win as the Spetznaz XD
Lach1234 3 years ago
Yeah well...its the soviet anthem. I always play with spentznaz anyway :D
SoviPaPa 3 years ago
igen én is erre jutottam miután kicsit tovább hallgattam
animehunter91 3 years ago
morgenstern
animehunter91 3 years ago
First morgenstern, and then Mein Herz brennt Rammstein
SoviPaPa 3 years ago