This man talks a LOT of sense, but I am SURE that a certain "9-11 Professional" will say he's wrong because *he* is the only one qualified (in his own head at least) to question NIST's report
There isn't an explanation for the sectioning of the central core that works within NIST's jet-fuel fire hypothesis, nor does DK's nukes under WTC one either
The official explanation is demonstrably very flawed and clearly a real investigation (not one constrained to a predetermined outcome) is needed
Nice work, Gordon. Thanks or uploading this.
ShillBasher 4 months ago
This man talks a LOT of sense, but I am SURE that a certain "9-11 Professional" will say he's wrong because *he* is the only one qualified (in his own head at least) to question NIST's report
There isn't an explanation for the sectioning of the central core that works within NIST's jet-fuel fire hypothesis, nor does DK's nukes under WTC one either
The official explanation is demonstrably very flawed and clearly a real investigation (not one constrained to a predetermined outcome) is needed
bluesman979 6 months ago