Why the fuck do they still sell GTX 580 at the price of Radeon 7970, which is way better than GTX 580 (Seriously, benchmarks, specifications, even this video prove it)??? My country is a shit. Technology is a shit. Marketing is A PLAGUED SHIT!
In April when kepler hits AMD will be at the back of the bus again. GTX680/690 will once again be on top . The 7970 will be for the mainstream folks. I'll just upgrade my 2 gtx580s 3gb to 2 680s and ownage again @ 2560 x 1600 all ultra.
@rockrl98 The majority of Hardware reviewers have stated on their websites that the 6990 is slightly faster than the 590. Don't believe me? Google after reviews 6990 vs 590 and you will see.
When is intense part like 2:50 7970 isn't so much faster than gtx 580 so amd isn't improved tessalation performance like they said 4 times better than 6900 series fps still drops so kepler will easily beat 7950 and 7970 especially in tessalation performance
I was without my Desktop for awhile. I decided to play Bad Company 2 on the PS3 we have for Hulu and Netflix. My mouth hit the floor. How the FUCK do console people see anything??!
@Br0k3n1mAg1nAsHuNn3d They have a completely different architecture (Evergreen of the 5770 vs VLIW5 of the 6870), so there is no way you can CF them. Also, if you are looking for a worthy upgrade for your system, I would suggest buying a 6950.
Now here is a question, what looks better AMD or Nvidia or is it the same, just FPS stats and power use is the issue?
I want something that plays every game maxed out at 1920 x 1080 that has 30 + fps and looks wonderful, tho I am having a hard time between the two, I used Nvidia years back on my old PC and it maxed Crysis tho my pc was crap, the AMD I have runs well but some times looks like crap... I have a 5770 HD
that test is a waste of time, one card is PCIE 2.0 and the othere is 3.0 and its only running at about 80% of its performance maximum, so whats the point of that ?
test should have been done on a Rampage 4 Extreme that suport both gen 2 and gen 3 PCIE then give the numbers out. wont be so close for the end result then i can asure you, the 580 will be raped pillaged and then kept as the 7970's bitch.
@SRSpoony you're actually wrong its not 80%, in some cases PCIe 3.0 makes the card perform worse and otherwise gives an increased performance of about 0.22%-0.8%, so the card performed nearly at max capability.
@Erulilum listern sunshine your already starting to bore me to the core, go back to trolling about things you already know, since i have a PCIE 2.0 setup and a 3.0 setup i think i know more than you on whats running at what speeds.
i can hear your mommy calling for you r bed time and telling you to get your homework done before you go sleepy time, stick to consoles kid and playing MW3
@SRSpoony Why get so butthurt, just run some benchmarks now and compare the results the only "substantial" performance increase would be with graphics programs with 5-8% increase, while it would have no impact whatsoever on games. Since none of the current graphics cards can even use the full potential of PCIe 2.0,
@captaincough a single GPU bounced the Dual 590 ??? shit . I love AMD/ATI GPU's i have the 5970 its Uncle. I have not OC'd it . I'm thinking of the 7970 ..when I max out my X58 Board. would like to for the INtel HEX 970/980 (locked) and populate all my ram slots to 24gb or should i just by another 5970 and go quad-fire ?
@ZoneTelevision The 5xxx series don't scale that well in tri- and quadfire. If you are thinking of upgrading wait for the next series from Nvidia. You won't get much from upgrading your ram (unless you are video editing). You should just get a 2500k or something or wait for Ivy-Bridge since the 980 doesn't perform that much better.
@ZoneTelevision If you have that amount of cash to spend then try learning about hardware first and decide for yourself instead of posting a load of boasting bullshit. More to being an enthusiast than just buying parts i fyou don't have a clue what the hell your buying.
@ElensarFFXI Wouldn't surprise me in the least if you salivated at the attempt to wipe your ass all over my post. ..
I was voicing information by responding to a person about my system for the purpose of getting an informed opinion.. (fuck you very much)..
Yours was not solicited yet you took the liberty voice your contempt as for some reason it irks you that someone may not know as much. Learn to be member of the human race first ...then remove that hard-drive from your ass.
Why the fuck do people make these "the human eye can only see blah blah fps" comments, fucking educate yourselves for god sake, diferent people have different eyesight, some better than other which can tell/feel the smoothness ingame, fast games like racing or quick 1st person's you'll definitely notice the difference between 60 and 120 as the framerate needs to keep up with the motion on screen.
@yourma2000 do you not know what a monitor refresh rate is? if the fps is higher than the monitor refresh rate, vertical tearing will occur. the image will not appear smoother at all. this is why vsync exists. since most monitors have a refresh rate of 60 hertz, those people cannot see higher than 60 fps.
@TGSibtrippin226 Yeah, that's true. Unless you have 120 hz monitor like I have, I have no reason to use vsync since it doesn't tear unless it goes beyond 120 fps.
@yourma2000 I totally agreed, I'm getting tired of seeing people saying "Oh, the human eye can only see up to 30 fps", bullshit! The only reason why people can't see beyond 60 fps is NOT because of human eye capability, but because monitor can't handle that many fps (60 hz, hint hint). Unless you get the 120 hz monitor (which I currently have), you should be able to see up to 120 fps.
@yourma2000 It's actually the brain that interpolates what is happening, beyond a certain framerate. The human eye does have certain limits, and although some people's sight is better than others, there is indeed a limit to which we are all bound. The brain does a remarkable job interpolating the data it receives from the eyes to give us as clear a picture as possible.
@yourma2000 im playing dead space 2 now and if the game is locked at 30 fps v-sync on i cant see shit while i move the mouse i have to keep it off getting 150 fps and crystal clear view of every think 30 fps vs 150 fps is like hell and heaven
@yourma2000 totally true ... that's why we keep on upgrading our GPU's to keep up with the frame rate we enjoy playing at. we are not normal players we are Gamers :)
@yourma2000 The average is about 60 FPS, but it varies alot between people. I can actually notice a big difference between 60 and 75 FPS, for example. If anyone can only go up to 30 frames per second, its YouTube itself (unless you have HTML 5 on your video).
@yourma2000 u really dont pay attention in science do u? the human eye sees 24 fps but anything above 30 appears as liquid to us and if u ever saw a video with 120 and compare to 60 it will look the same
not sure why people want to have a very expensive card to have over 100 or 80 fps, the human eye can only 60 wich alot of mid end card can do that at some games.
@gunnar045 so obviously you have never heard of... splitting? or... 120hz? well. see the faster the frame-rate the faster the response is gonna be... I have a 120hz monitor and a 60hz monitor... My 60hz is rated 2ms... and i thought that was responsive.. but Bwahaha.. Noo wayy is it faster then a 120hz... so yeah.. thats partly the reason bud.. lol
@gunnar045 It's not the human eye that can't see beyond 60 fps, but because the monitor can't handle it since most monitor's refresh rate is 60 hz. If you have 120 hz like I have, you should be able to see the difference between 60 fps and 120 fps.
Surprised how close it is to the 580, best mate works in a local pc. customer bought a 580 and it was to big for there case so he gave it back bought it from my m8 for 230 euro 8 months ago solid buy i feel :)
About what i was expecting. the only thing i find strange are the temps. the 580 was 67c at it's hottest point. well the 7970 was 70c. i would have thought the new arch would have been cooler running.
@Geforce6150se We already know that this coming generation of Nvidia products are NOT going to be 28 nm. On another note the next gen cards for Nvidia will not be out for at least a couple more months meaning at this time these are the highest end offerings for both companies, as far as single gpu cards go.
Considering looking at the GPU-z info on the cards.... that radeon is really not pulling that far ahead of the Nvidia card compared to how much more powerful it looks on the spec comparison. Nvidia still wins as far as im concerned not that anyone cares about my opinion hahaha
@ElensarFFXI don't forget that the current drivers are very, very unstable. Give them a few months to "mature" and I expect to see a pretty decent performance increase (at least, i hope).
Main battle show... AMD VS NVIDIA... Bah never end... Nvidia fans get lost, and learn to lose... :D You will have to learn it for some time comming... :D Thank you Advansed Micro Device for giving us this pleasure to have this amazing things in our hands... :D at last some of them with 500E in they pocket... :D
@Xfrags Yes my eng is bad... but take it this way... my lang is not even close to eng rus gb... or something like that... So lear word I lose i shuld get over that... Make something beter... And then came back to fight... Thank you :)
@TheRealDerohneNick You butthurt because a card costing waaaay more gets equalled by a card costing much less. Oh and its 845mhz on the core out of the box Gigabyte SOC edition. So I'm sure Gigabyte got me covered on that one :D what was that about warranty Mr nub? :3 I paid £250 for this card. Yes the 580 can get more out of it when its overclocked thats obvious and for £400 I would expect so. Try harder next time nubby ^O^
@YonOtto I still don't get why you think that this stands in any relation to the video. You weren't clear on the specific card name in your first two comments. How should I know you got a pre-oc card?
I even agree with you, that the price gap between enthusiast and top notch is too high, so you can calm down. It was more of a misunderstanding than a disagreement.
@TheRealDerohneNick This isnt a forum where you are supposed to keep on topic, hell I could post a comment about how much petrol costs or how cold it is outside XD and noone can do shit :3... but I saw the 580 running 3Dmark11 exactly like my 570 runs it and was shocked so I made a comment about it yeh £330 right now as the new cards are being released sooon plus AMD are destroying Nvidia atm until they release their new cards, but back when I purchased my 570 the 580 was £400
I would really like to see what both of these cards ,each overclocked to 1ghz core clock would do against each other (I know it's a lot harder/luckier to get a gtx 580 to 1ghz)
I bought my first "high end" card in 2011. It was a GTX 580.
Never again will I waste so much money on a high end card. It's brilliant, don't get me wrong. But there were virtually no games in the past 18 months that actually took advantage of its power. In future I'll definitely be buying in the enthusiast range rather than the top end. It's a complete waste.
@dkamm65 Benchmarks benchmarks benchmarks... True, but the console market is ruining standards for games - MASSIVELY.
So unless you're an enhthusiast who just likes to sit around running benchmarks all day, there'd be no use for that kind of hardware. That'll cause hardware creators to lose their enthusiasm - not generating as powerful increases with their prodcuts per generation.
@WARFOX101 Erm, that was the point I was trying to make...
My point being that nowadays there is little difference between console and PC graphics [in most games], other than extra effects, features (such as AA, etc.) and the higher internal resolution that the GPU would produce.
@johnchen0213 My point is cards in a few years will make this benchmark look like nothing. It's interesting to see the trend in performance improvements.
@dkamm65 but there will be other benchmarks where they will be getting the same results, ones that look much better...got to love the hardware industry XD
i wait for maxwell ;d
gamekillernick 3 weeks ago
Why the fuck do they still sell GTX 580 at the price of Radeon 7970, which is way better than GTX 580 (Seriously, benchmarks, specifications, even this video prove it)??? My country is a shit. Technology is a shit. Marketing is A PLAGUED SHIT!
reichstag10 4 weeks ago
its always like that. Every 1 year, better faster GPUs come out
flawns 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
I can't wait to see you mysteriously get ahold of a GTX 780 (the 600 series is mobile, the 700 series is desktop).
Amaroqdricaldari 1 month ago
Enter to my channel to see my score. P14842. I wait for you!
angelisku 1 month ago
Entrad a mi canal para ver mi puntuacion. P14842.
Os espero!
angelisku 1 month ago
In April when kepler hits AMD will be at the back of the bus again. GTX680/690 will once again be on top . The 7970 will be for the mainstream folks. I'll just upgrade my 2 gtx580s 3gb to 2 680s and ownage again @ 2560 x 1600 all ultra.
USArmySGT40 1 month ago
@USArmySGT40 Ehm, don't think so. The fastest card today is 6990. A little bit faster then the GTX 590 not much. I don't think Nvidia will beat ATI.
metalpounder 1 month ago
@metalpounder nope ! both are fast and in nvidia titles the nvidia will be faster.
rockrl98 1 month ago
Comment removed
metalpounder 4 weeks ago
@rockrl98 The majority of Hardware reviewers have stated on their websites that the 6990 is slightly faster than the 590. Don't believe me? Google after reviews 6990 vs 590 and you will see.
metalpounder 4 weeks ago
A 580 replacement is pointless in most ways
3pHop 1 month ago
what's the name of the intro sound. it#s rocking hard :D
CHEATSrichter92 1 month ago
When is intense part like 2:50 7970 isn't so much faster than gtx 580 so amd isn't improved tessalation performance like they said 4 times better than 6900 series fps still drops so kepler will easily beat 7950 and 7970 especially in tessalation performance
audigamer1 1 month ago in playlist More videos from trubritar
@audigamer1 dude the 18 fps and 22 is the same diffrence like 180 fps vs 220 so stfu!
rockrl98 1 month ago
Not that impressive from the hd7970 apart from the power and heat results.
There where only a few FPS in it most of the time.
New Nvidia for me,me thinks.
TheErd72 1 month ago
I was without my Desktop for awhile. I decided to play Bad Company 2 on the PS3 we have for Hulu and Netflix. My mouth hit the floor. How the FUCK do console people see anything??!
uknoitsHC 1 month ago 2
@Br0k3n1mAg1nAsHuNn3d They have a completely different architecture (Evergreen of the 5770 vs VLIW5 of the 6870), so there is no way you can CF them. Also, if you are looking for a worthy upgrade for your system, I would suggest buying a 6950.
CMMCQ 1 month ago in playlist More videos from trubritar
Tnx for the awsome video.
PowerPc94 1 month ago
Now here is a question, what looks better AMD or Nvidia or is it the same, just FPS stats and power use is the issue?
I want something that plays every game maxed out at 1920 x 1080 that has 30 + fps and looks wonderful, tho I am having a hard time between the two, I used Nvidia years back on my old PC and it maxed Crysis tho my pc was crap, the AMD I have runs well but some times looks like crap... I have a 5770 HD
ZaneLear 1 month ago
yeah!!!! awsome :D :D muahahah but two 7970 cannot play bf3 :D muahahahahahahahah
TheSurroundGaming 1 month ago
The HD7970 kick gtx580 ass in every way
TiranusTX 1 month ago
@TiranusTX in benchmarks true not in games :D specially with crossfire :D muahahahahahhahahaha
TheSurroundGaming 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you watched this video while having your breakfast !
checobeltran 1 month ago
It's nice to have the metal music again!
lasaldude 1 month ago
What I would do for a wireframe mode :3
falconmick 1 month ago
After just 1 year of the GTX 580 3GB release:
A new powerful card, with much more efficiency, and much less heat..
damn you technology, lol..
othman626 1 month ago 10
Took you a while to get benchmarks posted, but good job and thanks! I'd love to see how these new AMD cards perform when overclocked!
ItsjustagameNUB 1 month ago
that test is a waste of time, one card is PCIE 2.0 and the othere is 3.0 and its only running at about 80% of its performance maximum, so whats the point of that ?
test should have been done on a Rampage 4 Extreme that suport both gen 2 and gen 3 PCIE then give the numbers out. wont be so close for the end result then i can asure you, the 580 will be raped pillaged and then kept as the 7970's bitch.
SRSpoony 1 month ago
@SRSpoony you're actually wrong its not 80%, in some cases PCIe 3.0 makes the card perform worse and otherwise gives an increased performance of about 0.22%-0.8%, so the card performed nearly at max capability.
Erulilum 1 month ago
@Erulilum listern sunshine your already starting to bore me to the core, go back to trolling about things you already know, since i have a PCIE 2.0 setup and a 3.0 setup i think i know more than you on whats running at what speeds.
i can hear your mommy calling for you r bed time and telling you to get your homework done before you go sleepy time, stick to consoles kid and playing MW3
SRSpoony 1 month ago
@SRSpoony Why get so butthurt, just run some benchmarks now and compare the results the only "substantial" performance increase would be with graphics programs with 5-8% increase, while it would have no impact whatsoever on games. Since none of the current graphics cards can even use the full potential of PCIe 2.0,
Erulilum 1 month ago
@Erulilum dont feed the troll man. this 7970 is awesome
TiranusTX 1 month ago
Now we need the games that will use these cards not the fucking console ports!
gamerro25 1 month ago
Very happy to see another trubitar video!!!!
eloyhbermudez 1 month ago
OOOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVERRRRRRCLOCK THEM
bob333336 1 month ago
LOL a OC'ed 7950 has a 3Dmark P score of 8870 that beats a 590 with a score of 8734.
captaincough 1 month ago
@captaincough a single GPU bounced the Dual 590 ??? shit . I love AMD/ATI GPU's i have the 5970 its Uncle. I have not OC'd it . I'm thinking of the 7970 ..when I max out my X58 Board. would like to for the INtel HEX 970/980 (locked) and populate all my ram slots to 24gb or should i just by another 5970 and go quad-fire ?
ZoneTelevision 1 month ago
@ZoneTelevision The 5xxx series don't scale that well in tri- and quadfire. If you are thinking of upgrading wait for the next series from Nvidia. You won't get much from upgrading your ram (unless you are video editing). You should just get a 2500k or something or wait for Ivy-Bridge since the 980 doesn't perform that much better.
dolph123454321 1 month ago
@ZoneTelevision If you have that amount of cash to spend then try learning about hardware first and decide for yourself instead of posting a load of boasting bullshit. More to being an enthusiast than just buying parts i fyou don't have a clue what the hell your buying.
ElensarFFXI 1 month ago
@ElensarFFXI Wouldn't surprise me in the least if you salivated at the attempt to wipe your ass all over my post. ..
I was voicing information by responding to a person about my system for the purpose of getting an informed opinion.. (fuck you very much)..
Yours was not solicited yet you took the liberty voice your contempt as for some reason it irks you that someone may not know as much. Learn to be member of the human race first ...then remove that hard-drive from your ass.
ZoneTelevision 1 month ago
@ZoneTelevision Your post was a pointless boast about your system. It was fuck all about getting help lol.
ElensarFFXI 1 month ago
Comment removed
mannydegger 1 month ago
Why the fuck do people make these "the human eye can only see blah blah fps" comments, fucking educate yourselves for god sake, diferent people have different eyesight, some better than other which can tell/feel the smoothness ingame, fast games like racing or quick 1st person's you'll definitely notice the difference between 60 and 120 as the framerate needs to keep up with the motion on screen.
yourma2000 1 month ago 41
@yourma2000 do you not know what a monitor refresh rate is? if the fps is higher than the monitor refresh rate, vertical tearing will occur. the image will not appear smoother at all. this is why vsync exists. since most monitors have a refresh rate of 60 hertz, those people cannot see higher than 60 fps.
TGSibtrippin226 1 month ago
@TGSibtrippin226 Yeah, that's true. Unless you have 120 hz monitor like I have, I have no reason to use vsync since it doesn't tear unless it goes beyond 120 fps.
aigamerDS 1 month ago
@yourma2000 I totally agreed, I'm getting tired of seeing people saying "Oh, the human eye can only see up to 30 fps", bullshit! The only reason why people can't see beyond 60 fps is NOT because of human eye capability, but because monitor can't handle that many fps (60 hz, hint hint). Unless you get the 120 hz monitor (which I currently have), you should be able to see up to 120 fps.
aigamerDS 1 month ago
@yourma2000 It's actually the brain that interpolates what is happening, beyond a certain framerate. The human eye does have certain limits, and although some people's sight is better than others, there is indeed a limit to which we are all bound. The brain does a remarkable job interpolating the data it receives from the eyes to give us as clear a picture as possible.
Ultimist 1 month ago
@yourma2000 im playing dead space 2 now and if the game is locked at 30 fps v-sync on i cant see shit while i move the mouse i have to keep it off getting 150 fps and crystal clear view of every think 30 fps vs 150 fps is like hell and heaven
club4ghz 1 month ago
@yourma2000 Whats even more retarded is the fact they are saying that on a BENCHMARK test.
GT5Enthusiast 1 month ago
@yourma2000 totally true ... that's why we keep on upgrading our GPU's to keep up with the frame rate we enjoy playing at. we are not normal players we are Gamers :)
TheLordstrider 1 month ago
@yourma2000 The average is about 60 FPS, but it varies alot between people. I can actually notice a big difference between 60 and 75 FPS, for example. If anyone can only go up to 30 frames per second, its YouTube itself (unless you have HTML 5 on your video).
Amaroqdricaldari 1 month ago
@yourma2000 u really dont pay attention in science do u? the human eye sees 24 fps but anything above 30 appears as liquid to us and if u ever saw a video with 120 and compare to 60 it will look the same
BulletProofGeek 4 days ago
@yourma2000 u tube videos are played at 25-30 fps u cant tell the difference between 30 and 120
BulletProofGeek 4 days ago
not sure why people want to have a very expensive card to have over 100 or 80 fps, the human eye can only 60 wich alot of mid end card can do that at some games.
gunnar045 1 month ago
@gunnar045 so obviously you have never heard of... splitting? or... 120hz? well. see the faster the frame-rate the faster the response is gonna be... I have a 120hz monitor and a 60hz monitor... My 60hz is rated 2ms... and i thought that was responsive.. but Bwahaha.. Noo wayy is it faster then a 120hz... so yeah.. thats partly the reason bud.. lol
cncmasterw 1 month ago
@gunnar045 It's not the human eye that can't see beyond 60 fps, but because the monitor can't handle it since most monitor's refresh rate is 60 hz. If you have 120 hz like I have, you should be able to see the difference between 60 fps and 120 fps.
aigamerDS 1 month ago
@gunnar045 DURRRRRP
Exestenz 1 month ago
Thanks Trubritar, you super trooper you!
archolon 1 month ago
Great video but the gtx 580 ultra classified @ 900 MHz for $549 is a better comparison on newegg no tax free shipping!
aberkae 1 month ago
@aberkae the GTX580 will still get raped, specially if they OC the HD7970 to 1200Mhz, which is easily achieved ;)
Czyerx 1 month ago
why is the PCI E Running at the 1.1 spec only for the ATI card?
thelasthallow 1 month ago
@thelasthallow Because its PCI-E 3.0 specifications.
bigrigross 1 month ago
Surprised how close it is to the 580, best mate works in a local pc. customer bought a 580 and it was to big for there case so he gave it back bought it from my m8 for 230 euro 8 months ago solid buy i feel :)
zeansor 1 month ago
MOTHER OF SILICON!!
luanswan2002 1 month ago
7970 sucks, really lookin forward to kepler :D
kyle7412 1 month ago
I feel like ATI over clocks to the detriment of lifespan of the card, and geforce is of higher quality. so like 2 frames? Im sticking with geforce
bl4h1 1 month ago
Awesome Pc-Porn trubritar xD
Snake1979xfire 1 month ago
About what i was expecting. the only thing i find strange are the temps. the 580 was 67c at it's hottest point. well the 7970 was 70c. i would have thought the new arch would have been cooler running.
BlueFoxTV 1 month ago
Would a 700w coolermaster real power psu run a 7970?
aschris87 1 month ago
@aschris87 Yes but be sure to use 2 separate 12 volt rails
Xfrags 1 month ago
@aschris87 yes
piskooooo 1 month ago
what about a EVGA GTX580 classified vs 7970?
maxkillz2 1 month ago
this is 28 nm vs 40 nm when nvidia 28nm cards will be out there will be fair comparation and all amd fanboys Facepalm
Geforce6150se 1 month ago
@Geforce6150se And your waiting, have fun doing so. I no I will have fun waiting for HD8000 series ;P
captaincough 1 month ago
@Geforce6150se We already know that this coming generation of Nvidia products are NOT going to be 28 nm. On another note the next gen cards for Nvidia will not be out for at least a couple more months meaning at this time these are the highest end offerings for both companies, as far as single gpu cards go.
Th3Gr33nArr0w 1 month ago
THAT FERMI HEAT BRO
MartinGod3992 1 month ago
Considering looking at the GPU-z info on the cards.... that radeon is really not pulling that far ahead of the Nvidia card compared to how much more powerful it looks on the spec comparison. Nvidia still wins as far as im concerned not that anyone cares about my opinion hahaha
ElensarFFXI 1 month ago
@ElensarFFXI Exactly. Facts >>>> opinions.
SWOgottaGO 1 month ago
@SWOgottaGO Fact is that card should be pulling much further ahead than it is.
ElensarFFXI 1 month ago
@ElensarFFXI don't forget that the current drivers are very, very unstable. Give them a few months to "mature" and I expect to see a pretty decent performance increase (at least, i hope).
thierryvt 1 month ago
@thierryvt ATIs drivers are always rediculous and unstable regardless of how mature they are.
ElensarFFXI 1 month ago
Wow the 7970 beat the 580 in performance and energy consume, let's see if nvidia can compite again with the new kepler gpus.
juegostube 1 month ago
I am a nvidia fanboy, but, boy!! the 7970 corners the 580 and gives it a good hiding.
bsanyal1978 1 month ago
Main battle show... AMD VS NVIDIA... Bah never end... Nvidia fans get lost, and learn to lose... :D You will have to learn it for some time comming... :D Thank you Advansed Micro Device for giving us this pleasure to have this amazing things in our hands... :D at last some of them with 500E in they pocket... :D
YU1SRT 1 month ago
@YU1SRT looks like advanced is 2 advanced for you to spell trolololol
Xfrags 1 month ago
@Xfrags Yes my eng is bad... but take it this way... my lang is not even close to eng rus gb... or something like that... So lear word I lose i shuld get over that... Make something beter... And then came back to fight... Thank you :)
YU1SRT 1 month ago
I'd like to see how a max stable overclocked 580 would fair against a max stable overclocked 7970. Would the performance gap be smaller or larger?
captaincough 1 month ago
clearly a poorly designed engine, and thus irrelevant to proving the actual power of these cards...
gainpro 1 month ago
@gainpro Comparing would still work though.
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@TheRealDerohneNick with false info? pfft.
gainpro 1 month ago
@gainpro If the powerleak is the same on both cards, it would still be compareable. xD
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
The difference is not that big...I can't imagine a nVidia gpu made at 28nm
NOXXism 1 month ago
My 570 performs like this 580.
YonOtto 1 month ago
@YonOtto OC?
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@TheRealDerohneNick 845
YonOtto 1 month ago
@YonOtto See, the 580 is on stock, you can't compare. ^^
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@TheRealDerohneNick No shit its stock. But my point being I have my 570 performing like a stock 580 and saved myself £150 in the process. WIN!
YonOtto 1 month ago
@YonOtto No shit. Now you lost the warenty. You can go even higher with the 580... I thought you had a good point for posting. xD
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@TheRealDerohneNick You butthurt because a card costing waaaay more gets equalled by a card costing much less. Oh and its 845mhz on the core out of the box Gigabyte SOC edition. So I'm sure Gigabyte got me covered on that one :D what was that about warranty Mr nub? :3 I paid £250 for this card. Yes the 580 can get more out of it when its overclocked thats obvious and for £400 I would expect so. Try harder next time nubby ^O^
YonOtto 1 month ago
@YonOtto I still don't get why you think that this stands in any relation to the video. You weren't clear on the specific card name in your first two comments. How should I know you got a pre-oc card?
I even agree with you, that the price gap between enthusiast and top notch is too high, so you can calm down. It was more of a misunderstanding than a disagreement.
The cheapest 580GTX is like £330 btw.
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@TheRealDerohneNick This isnt a forum where you are supposed to keep on topic, hell I could post a comment about how much petrol costs or how cold it is outside XD and noone can do shit :3... but I saw the 580 running 3Dmark11 exactly like my 570 runs it and was shocked so I made a comment about it yeh £330 right now as the new cards are being released sooon plus AMD are destroying Nvidia atm until they release their new cards, but back when I purchased my 570 the 580 was £400
YonOtto 1 month ago
@YonOtto You are right, it still confused me. ^^
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@YonOtto as does my gtx 560ti 448 cores classified no need to waste money on a 580.
XxViciousxX 1 month ago
Trubitar, i really want to download that badass intro music
Judoca08 1 month ago
@Judoca08 me too.. lol
don2xify 1 month ago
I would really like to see what both of these cards ,each overclocked to 1ghz core clock would do against each other (I know it's a lot harder/luckier to get a gtx 580 to 1ghz)
BarackMcBush 1 month ago
Lol, not that big of a difference
victor555117 1 month ago
Why did i buy a 1200w PSU?.. hmm
TheJeepGeek 1 month ago
@TheJeepGeek SLI oder Crossfire! :D
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
I bought my first "high end" card in 2011. It was a GTX 580.
Never again will I waste so much money on a high end card. It's brilliant, don't get me wrong. But there were virtually no games in the past 18 months that actually took advantage of its power. In future I'll definitely be buying in the enthusiast range rather than the top end. It's a complete waste.
bassdemon16 1 month ago
4th!nvidia gets destroyed again!
viziki1 1 month ago
@viziki1 Well, you should wait for the 600 series. xD
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@TheRealDerohneNick i ve got to agree on this thought..
viziki1 1 month ago
ya ya ya so cool
narut0man1000 1 month ago
Can't wait to see cards in a few years. They'll be hitting 100+ fps minimums on this benchmark with no problem.
dkamm65 1 month ago 17
@dkamm65 Benchmarks in a few years. <1 fps with these cards. xD
TheRealDerohneNick 1 month ago
@dkamm65 there will always a new benchmark programme that will bring them to their there knees
Niqbal87 1 month ago
@dkamm65 Benchmarks benchmarks benchmarks... True, but the console market is ruining standards for games - MASSIVELY.
So unless you're an enhthusiast who just likes to sit around running benchmarks all day, there'd be no use for that kind of hardware. That'll cause hardware creators to lose their enthusiasm - not generating as powerful increases with their prodcuts per generation.
AmH032uTuBe 1 month ago
@AmH032uTuBe There is no fucking way id play console graphics. There is more to a pc enhthusiasts hardware than enhthusiast benchmarking.
WARFOX101 1 month ago 21
@WARFOX101 Erm, that was the point I was trying to make...
My point being that nowadays there is little difference between console and PC graphics [in most games], other than extra effects, features (such as AA, etc.) and the higher internal resolution that the GPU would produce.
AmH032uTuBe 1 month ago
@dkamm65 in a few years they'll be 3D Mark 22 and the results will be what you see now
jacekantoine 1 month ago
@dkamm65 Think about the Folding you can do!
QQkachu4U 1 month ago
@dkamm65 what's your point??? new benchmarks are gonna come out
johnchen0213 1 month ago
@johnchen0213 My point is cards in a few years will make this benchmark look like nothing. It's interesting to see the trend in performance improvements.
dkamm65 1 month ago
@dkamm65
You were probably the person saying that about Crysis in 2007, hurr never happened.
rushnerd 1 month ago
@rushnerd Hurr yes it did.
dkamm65 1 month ago
@dkamm65
Show me, now.
rushnerd 1 month ago
@rushnerd Are you telling me cards now can't run Crysis at >100 fps?
dkamm65 1 month ago
@dkamm65
Very high, 1080p at least. Watch Trub's own videos on this.
rushnerd 1 month ago
@dkamm65 ya cuz these are considered outdated :D
turboturboturboo 1 month ago
@dkamm65 but there will be other benchmarks where they will be getting the same results, ones that look much better...got to love the hardware industry XD
MobiousBlack 1 month ago
second...trololol^^
ThePowerOfX3m 1 month ago 3
waaaaaaaaaa! First Comment!!!
trubritar 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 38
@trubritar How about some overclocking benchmarks?
evilcrow1001 1 month ago
@trubritar LOL first comment is easy, try getting last comment. =P
Icureditwithmybrain 1 month ago 2