Several bombs were put out within the buildings of the WTC. If you look carefully enough you could see them going off one by one in different parts the buildings on other videos. NEVER trust the media about the news because they are actually try to tell you lies to cover up the truth since the are funded by the GOVERNMENT. THAT GUY IS LIEING about the bombs in the building floor because he was trying so hard to convince you, that there were no bombs.
Don Dahler was one of the first reporters,who was on the scene.P. Jennings mumbles some kind of a theory in a studio far far away.Who will you trust?The guy who is right there on the scene or someone who is miles away?Dahler intuitively told the story in a nutshell.He was there and realized, that no bombing was going on.It came down, from up to the bottom.Dahler wasn't just "CIA'ing" around a story.He made an observation and hit the bullseye.This is proof for and not against the official story
@Zardoz1977 Dahler was purportedly in his apartment during this report, not at the scene, and had also said at one point in the broadcast that he could not see below the top half of the buildings.
In any event, the fact that the buildings came down from top to bottom is not disputed by those who suspect they were demolished by explosives. What people find odd in this report is simply Dahler's overly-strong desire to contradict Jenning's theory, plus the unseen person saying "that should be it".
As far as I know he was first in his appartment, then on the scene. But doesn't matter, we don't know what he was able to see. Yesterday I watched at google-videos a completly unknown film, where the wtc collapses. The person shot the film from her appartment. It was possible to see a lot of details even from an appartment. And I rewatched every amateur-film, none of them was showing explosions. The nanothermite-theory in my eyes is wrong too, but that would take too long to explain
@Zardoz1977 Nobody in the mainstream truth movement claims to see explosions as they collapse, aside from those well-documented suspicious-looking squibs. We take issue with, amongst other things, the highly-improbable vertical collapses at near free-fall speed of massive modern steel-framed buildings, for which no credible scientific explanation has been given.
The nanothermite theory in my eyes is entirely plausible, but that would also take too long to explain.
@Zardoz1977 there were no raging fires, it was bull from the word get go. on film the top of the building can actually be seen going into freefall, this can only be achieved with the use of demolitions. 9/11 was an inside job.
SO.... you think that middle level reporters around the world were.. hmm, perhaps emailed the details of this inside demolition then? is that..... cos....cos that sounds like what you idiots are thinking.
responding to ryanwilliammac: You wonder why the FBI moved people away from the base of the towers. Umm, maybee becouse people were jumping and tons of debris were falling. Also maybee they were concerned the buildings might fall. I remember I was thinking they may collapse. I think it would have been odd if the police and FBI didnt move people away from the base of the towers. Also the builiding fell in 20 secs. no 10. and there was debris and bodys at pentagon and shanksville.
the area was evacuated on the ground floor, many blocks. people heard explosions but didnt see them because the explosions were on the ground floor. i wonder why the fbi moved everyone away?
These are the only 3 buildings in history to collapse from fire! They fell into path of greatest resistance without help of explosives? Where are the bodies from the plane that crashed into the field? The official coroner of the site said he saw no blood, not a drop! Where's the plane wreckage from the field? Where is the wreckage from the Pentagon? If it evaporated due to heat, why is the building not mangled, melted and burnt from intense heat? Where is the logic? Tapes from hotel? Gas bar?
Of course Peter Jenning's comment is not proof of demolition. It is only proof that he felt free to express his honest opinion as the event happened. Since he never mentioned that opinion again, even to say it was wrong, we can conclude he was told not to.
HAS there been any interview with this Don Dahler since 911, I would like to see how he answers questions about 911. He kept saying there was nothing exploding at the base, He wasnt asked about the base. Interesting
you are right, stock, and lets go further and ask this dahler why he is disputing PJ off the bat? does fire throw over a ton of girder 600' to harpoon into the FedX building? and dahler doesnt know that orio palmer, the chief of FDNY, was a floor away from worst of fires and said he could put them out w/o much problem. then sadly, the psycopaths immediatley blew up the tower he was in: witness his phone dying while communicating fact he could topple the flames ... bring it on, shills!
Hey dude!!! instead of being rational and scientific about this, let's loose our minds and ALSO beleive that when the plane hit the pentagon, it vapourised on impact due to the heat, yet the bodies were still identified. Wow, logic says there wouldn't be any bodies if the thing carrying them vapourised along with everything in it...
And ya know, scientifically proven it's impossible to "vapourise" a "747"
Ya pancaked at the rate of gravity,over 100 floors of concrete blown to dust,and countless first responders talking of secondary explosions,every single floor collapsing the same way,both buildings falling the same way,and oh ya building 7 also going the same way.The typical answers are just not physiological or scientific credible,lets get some straight answers,why are they so afraid to open a new 911 commission.$40,000,000 on a blowjob,and only $600,000 on this,sounds half assed to me:)
Oh really, kerosene burns at lower temp than propane, does your propane stove "soften or weaken " your camping stove? Office fires in NO WAY can generate enough heat to cause steel to melt or even weaken. If the buildings pancaked, it would have taken much longer to collapse. If they had pancaked, the core of the building, 47 massive steel beams would still been standing. Those metal beams were cut down into sizes that fit onto removal trucks, just another one in a million things that happened.
First off, LARGO your retarded if your going to compare 9/11 to the B-25 in 1945. The Width of a 747 is 68.5 Meters... and the width of a B-25 is 16.1 Meters. A 747 is more than 4 TIMES the size of a B-25! That is not similar. Second the fighter jet was only 25 miles away from his destination, indicating no where near a full tank of gas either... Snowboard is right your all ignorant if you think the government did this. 9/11 was terrible, fuck everyone trying to make this a conspiracy theory.
The street reporter is a foul liar. BBC correspondent Andrew Evans was in the lobby of WTC 1 when the first 4 huge basement explosions occured, and he said so live from New York on 9/11. There were 9 such explosions per tower before each collapse as recorded by the meteorological society. The game is over, it just remains to lever these murdering Bastards into the street where they can be dealt with like Mussolini was.
Do your research people, you are the brainwashed ones. Any one with half a brain knows there is no conspiracy or at least not done in the way many are stating. The buildings collapsed because the structure was sufficiently weakened. The U.S has taken advantage of this but did not, in my mind set this up.
It all makes sense now. Thanks ABC Einstein-news guy. You're like David Caruso or something.
The sheer weight of the top was too much for the bottom half of the building which was engineered to support at least 4 times the weight of the top section and had done so for 3 decades...I get it now...
Peter? Peter, the top section of the tower is constructed of presto logs and though they do burn slowly and evenly they have apparently failed to sustain the sheer weight of themselves.
A. The kerosene from the plane ignited immediately.
B. Once the main fuel was spent, the only fuel remaining would be the contents of the building.
C. burning desks, cubicles and ceiling tiles do not burn hot enough to weaken grade A structural steel.
Im from New York,(did some catering in tower 2.) Those buildings were monolithic they took up blocks of the city! no way two jets hitting them high would bring them down.
has a jet that big ever hit a building head on like that? think for a while? no. it only takes one or two floors to collapse to bring the rest of the building down
Actually ucantwin2000.... yes. in 1945 a B-25 bomber, similar in size to a 767 rammed the empire state at full speed in a dense fog. The fire from the fuel burned for a few hours, was put out by the fire dept. and it collapsed in... oh wait, it didn't.
B-25 is a WWII 2 engine prop driven bomber max speed 275-300 mph wingspan 67ft 6 in. max take off weight 41,800 lbs that hit the emp state builiding by accident. Boeing 767 is a 2 jet engine propelled max speed 530-570mph wingspan 156ft max take off weight 315,000+ lbs that hit the WTC on purpose. The jet carried alot more jet fuel then the b25's high octane gas.The 2 buildings have very different designs. Not much similar there. Just food for thought.
Sure i can, steel weakens at a much lower temp then it melts. Put stress on weakened steel in the form of.. of say a BUILDING!! and it will warp. If any of you think the government did this, you need the wake up. The government can barely pull off a cup of coffee half the time. Research covert and secretive activities and look at the record of massive cluster fucks. The only good to come from this conspiracy shit is now i dont have to listen to the JFK shit anymore.
Well, how is it that other highrises had burned for HOURS and never collapsed? Explain away shill. There are many cases in history where a highrise was burning on MANY FLOORS but the frame was left standing once the fires burned out, the steel held up. Now tell us how a fire on a few floors, that had major smoke because it was not a hot fire, can make a building collapse in less than an hour? Don't be stupid, watch this video and you can see the explosions flash v=JmQE1z_ro6U.
how many of those high rises were built and designed in the same unique way as the WTC? How many of them were hit by jets at 400+ mph? how many of them where as tall? Dont tell someone else to be stupid when you're in the middle of your own moronathon. The WTC was a unique situation in the history of high rise fires. But whats the use of debating with you people, you're so desperate to believe it was a huge conspiracy you'll believe anything. Even that anyone could pull off something this big.
Steel disperses the heat throughout it's beams,so your weakening theory is bogus.The flames from burning office furniture and carpets does not get hot enough to affect steel beams.The steel used was ABOVE what the code required,it was made to withstand a few burning floors and if it was to give out,it would take alot longer than less than an hour.Why was everyone so stupid that day and never even imagined the buildings would collapse?If so obvious that the heat would cause it?duh.
Disperses it to where exactly? It isnt my theory. Its the theory of the engineers who built the WTC. The theory of the scientists and engineers who studied the collapse and debris of the WTC. Maybe you should read their reports and not watch some video made by a couple kids... thats been revised 4 times. Ya know what, i'm done with you.. believe what you want.You people have proved my point, humans are too stupid and full of themselves to pull off a conspiracy that big.
Disperses it throughout the beam and by the time it gets to the middle of the beam it has cooled.So the beams were not just getting hot at the point of flame.Steel,when heated, disperses the heat throughout the beam so it would not have heated to the point of weakening.Those scientists and engineers you talk of ARE LINKED TO THE GOVERNMENT.Ask any of those who are INDEPENDENT of the government and the will scoff at the 9-11 report.If anyone is stupid,it is one who believes the 9-11 report.
at 30000 feet a plane maxes at around 550-600 mph, air is very thick and at sea level a commercial plane maxes at 300 mph and it is IMPOSSIBLE to beyond 400 MPH, sorry, NO PLANES
Bullshit...........blow it out your stupid ass. And in regards to your idiotic question......it disperses out thought the entire steel beam or structure.........go heat the end of a steel beam or rod to glowing hot then go grab the other end and see what is being explained to you.
Do research on how they built the wtc buildings,the engineers and architects built it to WITHSTAND A JET FLYING INTO IT. It was from government pressure after 9-11 to "we never thought of how the kerosene would melt the metal beams". Their story was changed,WHY IS THAT? If you had a brain, you would know the tentacles of the powers that be had gotten to them. You don't know the power of these organizations, watch " secret lives of Bill and Hillary" to get a clue of who is running this country.
If you think that 3 buildings fall the exact same way, on the same day and one of them wasn't even hit by a plane.....wake up. You watch how they come down at almost freefall speed and EXPLODING outward, everything turning to fine powder and with witnesses saying they heard explosions....in the url I provided you with below, you can plainly see charges going off, you can see molten metal spewing out off a corner just before collapse...you just can't handle the truth, bury your head and shut up.
charges? or the gas that was used to heat the building? 110 stories in the air is colder than on the ground. what did they use to heat the building? what kind of gas was used in the kitchens to heat and cook their food?
have you ever thought that maybe the explosions were a cause of the fire exploding the natural gases used to heat,cook food,etc?
Gulliani said in his press conference right after collapses that the GAS WAS TURNED OFF to prevent explosions. So throw that stupid theory out the window. It really is a case study on how people can be so easily fooled. How they will believe whatever their TV tells them. Will believe lie after lie by their government and still not question their motives. What is in your water? What is in your milk? America is an experiment and it is getting more absurd by the day.
Why don't you research what happens to a 757 flying at low altitude at that speed..While your at it, check out what EXPERT pilots who have flown military jets and commercial planes,say about the so called manuevers these amateur pilots,who couldn't even land a cessna plane,pulled off.They will tell the chances are 1 in a million.Research how many 1 in a million things happened that day.How bout the Norad ops that day?The stand down of military planes?Fema just happened to be in NY the day before
Isn't it funny how the people that sit around on YouTube are the kind of people that apparently try to promote these childish conspiracy theories...hahaha
we'll be heldding a public self town to town millitary army to fight this filty rich plot to destroy are american way of living. Power for the working people
lmao...you're a fucking subhuman piece of rat filth, a gulliable, non-thinking robot totally devoid of independent and rational analysis. Your "description" of this very Jennings excerpt is riddled with lies! He candidly stated that planned demolition may have been the cause of the twoer collapsing? Listen to what he actually says, douche! Go back to your mommy's basement where you belong, assface! rofl
Well, PrezCRG makes a point I was going to make, but with too much bile. There there enough suspicious things about 911 without reading into Jenning's words. The other points he makes about so-called experts and observers are better. Jennings does not say it was *caused* by planned demolition, but it LOOKS like one, which it does. To apply the same skepticism about the experts comments, how would Jennings know that? Surely JamieP is not going to infer that Jennings knows something we don't know.
fuc bush...it was a inside job..all you ppl who r brainwash...open your fuccen eye...steel melt at 2500+ degree..that sh!ttin flame that was comin out of the wtc wasnt even close to that number...get it thru your mind..bombs was planted in the wtc...
Don't use this footage to see the smoke puffs comming out of the building before and after it was falling. Very similar to demolition methods to keep a building from exploding or tipping over. You can notice in other footage how the building actually starts to tip then the bottom gives in.
i laugh at all of you who think this wasn't the first strike towards NWO hahahaha you all are fucked if you don't start waking up because, the next thing you know your going to have a new dollar, your going to have a new country and you going to have a little friend inside your skin that will hold all of you info. start waking up people!
who said it explosives were at the bottom. If you ever watch a tape of the towers going down, this time notice the puffs of smoke coming out of the windows and the sides of the bulding as it is falling. These little explosions weaken the steel beems(inside building) so a building implodes on itself instead of exploding outwards. They are triggered to go off one after the other... watch again and you'll notice. Very pecuiluar I'd say...
My videos are not the reason I believe 9/11 was an inside job - as the title says, they are merely "News Oddities" aimed at people who are already part of the 9/11 truth movement and have seen all the evidence for themselves.
As for directing you to my sources, I'm not going to spoon-feed you; I couldn't care less what you think and you can do the research for yourself (turning off the TV is a good place to start).
"To be highly certain of something, with a very low order of evidence, or in contradiction to a mountain of evidence, is a sign that something is wrong with your mind" - Sam Harris
To even consider this as evidence of a conspiracy is absolutely ridiculous, using this to prove your point is a prime example of how un-credible your argument is.
There's more evidence out there to suggest a conspiracy than there is to suggest it was done by 19 Arabs with box cutters, so if you belive the latter, then maybe *you're* the one who has "something wrong with your mind".
there are more stupid videos out there about conspiracies... with very little real evidence who's main creators are college kids. Most conspiracy theorist use things like this as their evidence which is embarrassing, there are endless amounts of scientific journals and papers explaining what happened to the towers as well as WTC 7. Take the time to look for them... you're going to have to read them and sadly thats where you lose most of conspiracy theorist's attention.
Well clearly they lost your attention because if you had studied papers by those who defend the official story such as NIST, Popular Mechanics, Purdue University etc, you'd have found them very lacking indeed from a scientific point of view.
I have lost much respect for this government and have none for bush for so time now. But don't let your anger drive your common sense. I would agree that the news is fixed, to a point, however the all the footage i have seen to me says exactly what that reporter said. It collapsed from the top down. IT s hard not to trust your eyes
Your all full of shit, your just one of those people that think everything has to be a god damn conspiracy theory and its not. What you say here is offensive not only to America as a country but to the people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and the subsequent wars. It is simply un-American and bull shit that you would believe such nonsense. Read a god damn history book you idiots. Not EVERYTHING is a fucking conspiracy.
If you really investigated all of the information then you would see more clearly...there are too many Scholars that said it was impossible for the planes to take down those buildings because they were built with that in mind.
so you are at the influence of all these government's lies and propaganda. Just think for a moment if it might be true, people done much more worst things. You think Bush is cool, and only place you see him is on TV. I think Bush is amazing, because he can kill and tell everybody that it wasn't him. I would say more if I knew english better.
I read all of the time...and when you look at all of the evidence...the only conclusion is that it could not have happened the way they said it did...if there is any other answer, why do they stick to this lame explanation???
pearl harbor money making MACHINE we tried to enter that war.. for the same lucrative factor that is! war on an idea.. 'terrorism' branded into the minds of so many that will just take it for what IT 'is' thousands of civilians for more oil, money, and control over a fearful nation.. seriously some dude coming out of a dirt hole can maneuver at what.. 500+ miles an hour into the center of that building.. and why is it that building 7 was mentioned and then forgotten about??
Regardless of opinion on 9/11 conspiracy theories, or lack thereof, I do find it very interesting that the conspiracy theories often are based upon information, and the nay sayers most often resort to simple rebuttals comprised of short sentences full of adjectives such as "crazy" or "loony". The conspiracy theories are comprised of heavy amount of research, effort, and of course, opinion. I expect the nay sayers to have the courage to respond in the same fashion.
And one more thing... I do believe that many conspiracy theories and the supporters do come off as very radical and possibly "stupid". But some conspiracy theories are very well laid-out and do it in a professional manner. A good film to watch... zeitgeistmovie(dot)com
Exactly, because if there was no evidence for any anomalies in the 'official' government account we'd all be happy to go away and leave it at that. However, it is very apparent that America has been hijacked by a corrupt government administration that is dragging the country into one war after another against the people's wishes. This is no democracy!
You mean you saw it on TV? because thats what most people who were in new york that claimed to have seen this with their own eyes REALLY saw on that day.
If you were there and saw it with your own eyes, then you should be appalled at the lies the government is throwing at us. You were there! And you think that what you saw happened because of a plane and some fire?!?! These buildings are built to withstand so much more than that!!! And you believe the official story??? How sad.
And yes, there are crazies out there, it's true. But this isn't one of those "I was molested by an alien" stories. This is serious. What the government is saying doesn't not match up with the videos, the photos, or the eye witness accounts. Plain and simple.
I've researched building 7 and yep! It collapsed because a 110 story building pretty much fell on it. The firemen even knew it was going to collapse prior to it actually collapsing...that's not much of a conspiracy if that knowledge was going around prior to the actual collapse. Get a life. Here's an idea for you: Research "getting laid!"
You sound like you're the one who never saw a pussy up close. You sound like a zit kid who wants attention because his mom never breast fed him. You're such an idiot it's funny to read you.
Oh, sorry. You were there. I forgot. You know more than the firefighters who just thought the building was significantly damaged. Dude, are you trying to be an major asshole or is it just coming naturally?
Wow, who am to believe? The firefighters who were there who actually knew that the building was going to collapse or some anonymous asshole on the internet? Hmmmmm!
Dude! You're completely full of shit and misinformation (and truth be known, you actualy know it). It is well documented that the building was severly damaged according to reports on that day. So quit with the bullshit smoke and mirrors you pathetic liar! You apparently can't get laid so this is what you with your free time. You're playing games now, asshole.
The news media said they were "worried about WTC7 collapsing". Then the BBC and CNN reported its collapse before it actually happened (search for BBC WTC7).
As for whether or not it was damaged, you can look at the videos and see that it's hardly damaged at all. Also, when steel skyscrapers ARE damaged, they don't collapse straight down at free fall speed into a nice neat little pile of rubble.
Jamie, the news media doesn't worry about things. The news media reports stories. One of the stories they reported from firefighters and structural engineers on the scene was that WTC7 was going to collapse.
I look at the video and I see a large section falling towared the building. Perhaps you are watching something else. And lastly, you aren't a structural engineer so you aren't qualified to say how a building should collapse. I'm done with you. YOu're playing games.
When I said "they" were worried I meant the city officials allegedly on the scene, obviously.
No major debris hit WTC7, and if it had there'd have been a visible impact crater.
It doesn't take a structural engineer to tell you that straight-down collapses of steel structures at free fall speed doesn't happen because of minor fires. Or even large fires.
It doesn't take a structural engineer. It simply takes citizens who will not just back and wave their little patriotic flags while the government tells them exactly what to think. Think for yourself!!
Seriosly folks! The 15 minutes of fame for the 911 truthers has come and gone. It's time to start ripping some new anuses with these jerks. Nobody is taking them seriously. That's why they have to interupt Bill Mahar's live taping because nobody is paying attention to them. Rot in hell you filthy bastards!
no, YOU ot in hell, fucking sheep. People like you can only insult because you refuse to look at the FACTS that architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, air controllers, CIA veterans, military personnel and a whole lotta people came up with. Do a little research or shut the fuck up before insulting people who are awake and perfectly sane.
poprip, the jig is up. You leftist America haters are drowning in your own leftist vomit. You're not cool. You're clowns. Nobody likes you. And why don't you just go join those that would be more than happy to slit your throat with a dull knife. And then let's see you continue to claim that the gov attacked its own people. What a cock knocker you are.
you mix it all up, you think we endorse terrorists, you think everyone in the movement proclaims what the Truth is. You're wrong, and you can only insult because you don't know shit about the whole subject. There are enough FACTS, not political agendas, or utopist ideals, to justify another comission, a real independant inquiry. PERIOD. You sound like a german in the late '30s, by the way.
wow! I'm amazed at how subtle, intelligent and articulate you are. Too bad the freedom of speech is used by assholes like you. Hannity and you have alot in common.
It's funny because to me, what is really going down the toilet is the american Empire. When a country like Irak is kicking your butt, one can easily see that the downfall has begun. Good luck my dear right wing sheep.
poprip, your cheesy attempt to use smoke and mirrors to take emphasis away from the cold hard facts of 911 may work with the Nascar crowd however it doesn't work for educated Americans. The fact of the matter is the US was attacked by Muslim extremists. You know it. I know it. And most educated people know it. Get over it and be a man like God intended you to be.
First of all, let me tell you something: God is a joke. It doesn't exist. You know it. I know it. Neither does the sasquash, or Santa Claus. Then, I'm educated, and in fact I'm pretty sure I know more about history than you do. I went to university, and I know what I'm talking about. You don't, you use insults and moronic comments to back your weak opinion.There's still hope for you though.
"Then, I'm educated, and in fact I'm pretty sure I know more about history than you do."
Nice sentence structure. Yep, that sentence is pretty much coming from an educated individual not to mention the fact that your conversation has now been reduced to "I'm smarter than you." Kind of pathetic.
pop, the reason why the country is going down the toilet is because we once had citizens who collectively put a man on the moon. Now we have citizens who believe in 911 fairy tales about massive gov cover ups. In other words, the intelligence level has gone down a lot. And you're, my little friend, are contributing to the big flush.
Sure, your belief in God is a huge indication of your intelligence. Just do a little research and use simple common sense and you'll discover that YOU are the person living in a big illusion. Go back to Fox News you don't want to miss Hannity and O'Reilly.
poprip, if pretending to "do research" gives you a feeling of empowerment, by all means, knock yourself out. If that's how you psychologically handle a tragic event like 911, then that's fine however please be cognizant of what's really going on. You aren't uncovering any massive coverup. All you are doing is giving yourself a sense of control. There are professional reporters who's job it is to investigate these matters. You aren't doing a better job than they are. Sorry.
I have a little question for you MGR1900. How many non-american lives are worth an american life?
Because as for now, it is around half a million innocent iraky civillians dead for 3000 american dead. Do the math, oh non wait you probably didn't go to school long enough...
It's called CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. That's what happened. It was perfect. Come down perfectly, saving lots of neighboring buildings from much damage. That's what controlled demolition does.
come on people do you seriously think 3 wtc buildings could fall at free fall speeds exactly the same. maybe if 1 fell that ok i would believe but not 3!! hey next time you need a building blown up who are you gonna call 19 arabs with some airplanes? inside job!!!
jlamber, apparently structural engineers SERIOUSLY believe the buildings fell as they did. Are you a structural engineer? I didn't so. So stop pretending you are an expert, you worthless cock knocker. Get a life.
I'm pretty sure you didn't read 3 lines of their pseudo report on it, because NIST (I'll let you search what it is) themselves now say (you can verify it but I'm sure you won't) they CAN'T explain the "collapse". So pleeeease, shut the fuck up, and go watch football you moron.
i am continually amazed at how paranoid, delusional and stupid so many people on Youtube are...starting with whoever created the text before and after this clip.
I hate FOX news - way to conservative and aligned with current administration, which I hate. But, people who believe 9/11 was an inside job by our gov't need to have their head examined.
You guys are stupid. This video isn't suspiscious at all! You're just trying to make stuff out of nowhere that will support your desired result...of course, if this WERE scripted - this is just ABC...TONS of people would have to be in on it...and yet none have come forward admitting what you call the "truth"! Get a life please.
To point 4, I see a building collapsing "in on itself" and not "exploding outward" in all videos of this event, so please stop trying to brainwash me with your interpretation.
I fail to see the point of this video. Is it supposed to somehow discredit the attack? I think it just seems to discredit the abilities of ABC news reporters.
the towers were blown to kingdom come. Their is absolutly no doubt. Controlled demolition from the top down. It is obvious that it had to be done this way. To fall where the planes hit. Concrete turned to dust before it hit the ground.
Holy fuck I can't believe you waste this much time! It fucking falls at the top! You can see it from all of the other camera angles. You should've stayed in school!
Where is the "video evidence" that there was explosion at the base of the tower? And when did Peter Jennings get his degree in structural engineering? He was a pretty boy talking head. Conspiracy theorists crack me up. If anything, you certainly are entertaining. For your sake, I hope you're aware of how ridiculous you are. If you're serious, I would consider consulting a psychiatrist; you might be a paranoid schizophrenic.
Go on America, take Don Dahler's word for it, he's incredibly perceptive and figured out how the building collapsed simply from witnessing it from afar.
Or you could be smart and realize that this buffoon has no clue of what caused these buildings to fall and was told what to say.
the top 1/4 of building collapses the foundation of same building where it is strongest , i no tink so.jet fuel isnt used to make steel melt.you need a oxygen forced under pressure to smelt steel(bessemer furnace?" if i am thinking right .
9/11=BULLSHIT................
apatriotofusa 3 months ago
Several bombs were put out within the buildings of the WTC. If you look carefully enough you could see them going off one by one in different parts the buildings on other videos. NEVER trust the media about the news because they are actually try to tell you lies to cover up the truth since the are funded by the GOVERNMENT. THAT GUY IS LIEING about the bombs in the building floor because he was trying so hard to convince you, that there were no bombs.
WarMachineRPD 8 months ago in playlist 9-11
ur government is feeding you all doodoo and yall r eating it like candy
tali2sexy4u 8 months ago
the black building begin in 1:15 to crowing . watch this. this is a fake
infokrieger23 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the black building begin in 1:15 to crowing . watch this. this is a fake
infokrieger23 1 year ago
Comment removed
infokrieger23 1 year ago
Don Dahler was one of the first reporters,who was on the scene.P. Jennings mumbles some kind of a theory in a studio far far away.Who will you trust?The guy who is right there on the scene or someone who is miles away?Dahler intuitively told the story in a nutshell.He was there and realized, that no bombing was going on.It came down, from up to the bottom.Dahler wasn't just "CIA'ing" around a story.He made an observation and hit the bullseye.This is proof for and not against the official story
Zardoz1977 1 year ago
@Zardoz1977 Dahler was purportedly in his apartment during this report, not at the scene, and had also said at one point in the broadcast that he could not see below the top half of the buildings.
In any event, the fact that the buildings came down from top to bottom is not disputed by those who suspect they were demolished by explosives. What people find odd in this report is simply Dahler's overly-strong desire to contradict Jenning's theory, plus the unseen person saying "that should be it".
Jamiep84 1 year ago
@Jamiep84
As far as I know he was first in his appartment, then on the scene. But doesn't matter, we don't know what he was able to see. Yesterday I watched at google-videos a completly unknown film, where the wtc collapses. The person shot the film from her appartment. It was possible to see a lot of details even from an appartment. And I rewatched every amateur-film, none of them was showing explosions. The nanothermite-theory in my eyes is wrong too, but that would take too long to explain
Zardoz1977 1 year ago
@Zardoz1977 Nobody in the mainstream truth movement claims to see explosions as they collapse, aside from those well-documented suspicious-looking squibs. We take issue with, amongst other things, the highly-improbable vertical collapses at near free-fall speed of massive modern steel-framed buildings, for which no credible scientific explanation has been given.
The nanothermite theory in my eyes is entirely plausible, but that would also take too long to explain.
Jamiep84 1 year ago
@Jamiep84 What about the bombs in the basement 20 min before the airplanes hit?
Marty495 1 year ago
@Jamiep84 What about the bombs that exploded in the basement before the planes hit? And the obviously cut on every mayor collums in the buildings?
Marty495 1 year ago
@Zardoz1977 there were no raging fires, it was bull from the word get go. on film the top of the building can actually be seen going into freefall, this can only be achieved with the use of demolitions. 9/11 was an inside job.
vengencefrom1979 9 months ago
SO.... you think that middle level reporters around the world were.. hmm, perhaps emailed the details of this inside demolition then? is that..... cos....cos that sounds like what you idiots are thinking.
wpsracing108 1 year ago
@rxhysen 911truth.org
BizarreMike666 1 year ago
responding to ryanwilliammac: You wonder why the FBI moved people away from the base of the towers. Umm, maybee becouse people were jumping and tons of debris were falling. Also maybee they were concerned the buildings might fall. I remember I was thinking they may collapse. I think it would have been odd if the police and FBI didnt move people away from the base of the towers. Also the builiding fell in 20 secs. no 10. and there was debris and bodys at pentagon and shanksville.
JPPolachek 1 year ago
@JPPolachek oh stfu. you dont know shit. the twin towers were brought down by a controlled demolition
666jewkid 1 year ago
the area was evacuated on the ground floor, many blocks. people heard explosions but didnt see them because the explosions were on the ground floor. i wonder why the fbi moved everyone away?
ryanwilliammac 1 year ago
These are the only 3 buildings in history to collapse from fire! They fell into path of greatest resistance without help of explosives? Where are the bodies from the plane that crashed into the field? The official coroner of the site said he saw no blood, not a drop! Where's the plane wreckage from the field? Where is the wreckage from the Pentagon? If it evaporated due to heat, why is the building not mangled, melted and burnt from intense heat? Where is the logic? Tapes from hotel? Gas bar?
BradfordJL 1 year ago
Of course Peter Jenning's comment is not proof of demolition. It is only proof that he felt free to express his honest opinion as the event happened. Since he never mentioned that opinion again, even to say it was wrong, we can conclude he was told not to.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
Peter Jennings was such a great guy, so smart and UNBAISED. May God bless his soul
amna72391 2 years ago
Don who?
alacartes 2 years ago
HAS there been any interview with this Don Dahler since 911, I would like to see how he answers questions about 911. He kept saying there was nothing exploding at the base, He wasnt asked about the base. Interesting
stockchalet 2 years ago
you are right, stock, and lets go further and ask this dahler why he is disputing PJ off the bat? does fire throw over a ton of girder 600' to harpoon into the FedX building? and dahler doesnt know that orio palmer, the chief of FDNY, was a floor away from worst of fires and said he could put them out w/o much problem. then sadly, the psycopaths immediatley blew up the tower he was in: witness his phone dying while communicating fact he could topple the flames ... bring it on, shills!
pt1gard 2 years ago
hey everybody!!! instead of being rational and scientific about this, let's loose our minds and believe in the story we find more facinating!!!
TheBiIIieJoe 3 years ago 2
Hey dude!!! instead of being rational and scientific about this, let's loose our minds and ALSO beleive that when the plane hit the pentagon, it vapourised on impact due to the heat, yet the bodies were still identified. Wow, logic says there wouldn't be any bodies if the thing carrying them vapourised along with everything in it...
And ya know, scientifically proven it's impossible to "vapourise" a "747"
But of course, Im not rational & scientific.
Silly me!
Spotfarm666 3 years ago
yes silly you....please cite your souces of this legit proof....and perhaps someone may take your paranoid rants seriously
TheBiIIieJoe 3 years ago
it is by far more fascinating to believe that the core columns pancaked, so i'm going with this theory.
Zhagarim 2 years ago
If they pancaked, then what happened to the 47 core columns?
Jamiep84 2 years ago
ok first of all he was stating that "whoever has seen a building fall on purpose" talking about the attack from the terrorists
MysteryDru 3 years ago
Why are you so dumb? On purpose means DEMOLITION, how do you get dressed without help?
blite13 3 years ago
some one should explain the path of most resistance to don vs. free fall speed ...
the buildings posed no resistance at all falling in about 10 seconds..free fall speed is 9.2 seconds ..
occision 3 years ago
Gee Don, the people working in the basement all heard and the saw explosions in the basement. So I'll take their word over....Don.
whaledog77 3 years ago
the building was taken down by control demolition.
theblackhart 3 years ago
i think so too, if he was at the bottom seeing no explosions, how did he clearly see the top collapsing at the same time.
pandaabuser 3 years ago
Ya pancaked at the rate of gravity,over 100 floors of concrete blown to dust,and countless first responders talking of secondary explosions,every single floor collapsing the same way,both buildings falling the same way,and oh ya building 7 also going the same way.The typical answers are just not physiological or scientific credible,lets get some straight answers,why are they so afraid to open a new 911 commission.$40,000,000 on a blowjob,and only $600,000 on this,sounds half assed to me:)
tacoma1968 3 years ago
The reporter was 100% correct. The heat on the top floors weakened the steel and the building "pancaked".
592010 3 years ago
Oh really, kerosene burns at lower temp than propane, does your propane stove "soften or weaken " your camping stove? Office fires in NO WAY can generate enough heat to cause steel to melt or even weaken. If the buildings pancaked, it would have taken much longer to collapse. If they had pancaked, the core of the building, 47 massive steel beams would still been standing. Those metal beams were cut down into sizes that fit onto removal trucks, just another one in a million things that happened.
blite13 3 years ago 2
First off, LARGO your retarded if your going to compare 9/11 to the B-25 in 1945. The Width of a 747 is 68.5 Meters... and the width of a B-25 is 16.1 Meters. A 747 is more than 4 TIMES the size of a B-25! That is not similar. Second the fighter jet was only 25 miles away from his destination, indicating no where near a full tank of gas either... Snowboard is right your all ignorant if you think the government did this. 9/11 was terrible, fuck everyone trying to make this a conspiracy theory.
ValanClothing00 3 years ago 2
"Thanks Don, very much" - hahaha, Jennings ruled
nineelvendude 3 years ago 6
The street reporter is a foul liar. BBC correspondent Andrew Evans was in the lobby of WTC 1 when the first 4 huge basement explosions occured, and he said so live from New York on 9/11. There were 9 such explosions per tower before each collapse as recorded by the meteorological society. The game is over, it just remains to lever these murdering Bastards into the street where they can be dealt with like Mussolini was.
kaferere 3 years ago 2
lemme repeat the same thing five times so you BELEIVE me
peyotero22 3 years ago 2
Give it a rest already
ccg1171 3 years ago
Do your research people, you are the brainwashed ones. Any one with half a brain knows there is no conspiracy or at least not done in the way many are stating. The buildings collapsed because the structure was sufficiently weakened. The U.S has taken advantage of this but did not, in my mind set this up.
bigsmither 3 years ago
wake up people this is a lemon that has been sold to you just a cursory look at the evidence shows gaping hols in the official story of 9/11
lethal1960 3 years ago
Jamiep84, you might want to consider checking out Erichufschmid's website to understand this issue about the medias selling us the fire theory.
People need to realize that Jews are controling the medias and were responsible for the attack. It was all planned.
AzraelEngel2 3 years ago
Watch the video released by the FDNY at ground zero, INSIDE The WTC. You can HEAR the controlled explosions going off overhead.
BANG!
BANG!
BANG!
BANG!
Then everything shakes and goes black.
darkfyreaol 3 years ago
it's not like we needed any more evidence that it was brought down by explosives..
If the FDNY really wanted to help, they would be arresting Israelis and Zionists right now. They're not helping anyone by releasing that tape.
AzraelEngel2 3 years ago
Don Dahler...
What a son of a bitch covering up Israel's terrorist attack.
AzraelEngel2 3 years ago
It all makes sense now. Thanks ABC Einstein-news guy. You're like David Caruso or something.
The sheer weight of the top was too much for the bottom half of the building which was engineered to support at least 4 times the weight of the top section and had done so for 3 decades...I get it now...
wellyes 3 years ago
So, the guy interrupting Peter Jennings was at the 9/11 planning meetings, along with the other 1000+ involved?
Why didn't Peter get the invite?
digammo 3 years ago
Peter? Peter, the top section of the tower is constructed of presto logs and though they do burn slowly and evenly they have apparently failed to sustain the sheer weight of themselves.
A. The kerosene from the plane ignited immediately.
B. Once the main fuel was spent, the only fuel remaining would be the contents of the building.
C. burning desks, cubicles and ceiling tiles do not burn hot enough to weaken grade A structural steel.
D. The building was imploded by design.
E. End of story.
louise12345 3 years ago
Im from New York,(did some catering in tower 2.) Those buildings were monolithic they took up blocks of the city! no way two jets hitting them high would bring them down.
jackvenom1 3 years ago
has a jet that big ever hit a building head on like that? think for a while? no. it only takes one or two floors to collapse to bring the rest of the building down
ucantwin2000 3 years ago
Actually ucantwin2000.... yes. in 1945 a B-25 bomber, similar in size to a 767 rammed the empire state at full speed in a dense fog. The fire from the fuel burned for a few hours, was put out by the fire dept. and it collapsed in... oh wait, it didn't.
LARGO125 3 years ago
B-25 is a WWII 2 engine prop driven bomber max speed 275-300 mph wingspan 67ft 6 in. max take off weight 41,800 lbs that hit the emp state builiding by accident. Boeing 767 is a 2 jet engine propelled max speed 530-570mph wingspan 156ft max take off weight 315,000+ lbs that hit the WTC on purpose. The jet carried alot more jet fuel then the b25's high octane gas.The 2 buildings have very different designs. Not much similar there. Just food for thought.
snowboredsnj 3 years ago
But jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt let alone warp steel, it doesn't, and you can't explain that away.
KoreyAusTex 3 years ago
Sure i can, steel weakens at a much lower temp then it melts. Put stress on weakened steel in the form of.. of say a BUILDING!! and it will warp. If any of you think the government did this, you need the wake up. The government can barely pull off a cup of coffee half the time. Research covert and secretive activities and look at the record of massive cluster fucks. The only good to come from this conspiracy shit is now i dont have to listen to the JFK shit anymore.
snowboredsnj 3 years ago
Well, how is it that other highrises had burned for HOURS and never collapsed? Explain away shill. There are many cases in history where a highrise was burning on MANY FLOORS but the frame was left standing once the fires burned out, the steel held up. Now tell us how a fire on a few floors, that had major smoke because it was not a hot fire, can make a building collapse in less than an hour? Don't be stupid, watch this video and you can see the explosions flash v=JmQE1z_ro6U.
blite13 3 years ago
how many of those high rises were built and designed in the same unique way as the WTC? How many of them were hit by jets at 400+ mph? how many of them where as tall? Dont tell someone else to be stupid when you're in the middle of your own moronathon. The WTC was a unique situation in the history of high rise fires. But whats the use of debating with you people, you're so desperate to believe it was a huge conspiracy you'll believe anything. Even that anyone could pull off something this big.
snowboredsnj 3 years ago
Steel disperses the heat throughout it's beams,so your weakening theory is bogus.The flames from burning office furniture and carpets does not get hot enough to affect steel beams.The steel used was ABOVE what the code required,it was made to withstand a few burning floors and if it was to give out,it would take alot longer than less than an hour.Why was everyone so stupid that day and never even imagined the buildings would collapse?If so obvious that the heat would cause it?duh.
blite13 3 years ago
Disperses it to where exactly? It isnt my theory. Its the theory of the engineers who built the WTC. The theory of the scientists and engineers who studied the collapse and debris of the WTC. Maybe you should read their reports and not watch some video made by a couple kids... thats been revised 4 times. Ya know what, i'm done with you.. believe what you want.You people have proved my point, humans are too stupid and full of themselves to pull off a conspiracy that big.
snowboredsnj 3 years ago
Disperses it throughout the beam and by the time it gets to the middle of the beam it has cooled.So the beams were not just getting hot at the point of flame.Steel,when heated, disperses the heat throughout the beam so it would not have heated to the point of weakening.Those scientists and engineers you talk of ARE LINKED TO THE GOVERNMENT.Ask any of those who are INDEPENDENT of the government and the will scoff at the 9-11 report.If anyone is stupid,it is one who believes the 9-11 report.
blite13 3 years ago 2
at 30000 feet a plane maxes at around 550-600 mph, air is very thick and at sea level a commercial plane maxes at 300 mph and it is IMPOSSIBLE to beyond 400 MPH, sorry, NO PLANES
stockchalet 2 years ago
Bullshit...........blow it out your stupid ass. And in regards to your idiotic question......it disperses out thought the entire steel beam or structure.........go heat the end of a steel beam or rod to glowing hot then go grab the other end and see what is being explained to you.
TheMexicanJulio 2 years ago
Do research on how they built the wtc buildings,the engineers and architects built it to WITHSTAND A JET FLYING INTO IT. It was from government pressure after 9-11 to "we never thought of how the kerosene would melt the metal beams". Their story was changed,WHY IS THAT? If you had a brain, you would know the tentacles of the powers that be had gotten to them. You don't know the power of these organizations, watch " secret lives of Bill and Hillary" to get a clue of who is running this country.
blite13 3 years ago
If you think that 3 buildings fall the exact same way, on the same day and one of them wasn't even hit by a plane.....wake up. You watch how they come down at almost freefall speed and EXPLODING outward, everything turning to fine powder and with witnesses saying they heard explosions....in the url I provided you with below, you can plainly see charges going off, you can see molten metal spewing out off a corner just before collapse...you just can't handle the truth, bury your head and shut up.
blite13 3 years ago
charges? or the gas that was used to heat the building? 110 stories in the air is colder than on the ground. what did they use to heat the building? what kind of gas was used in the kitchens to heat and cook their food?
have you ever thought that maybe the explosions were a cause of the fire exploding the natural gases used to heat,cook food,etc?
MysteryDru 3 years ago
Gulliani said in his press conference right after collapses that the GAS WAS TURNED OFF to prevent explosions. So throw that stupid theory out the window. It really is a case study on how people can be so easily fooled. How they will believe whatever their TV tells them. Will believe lie after lie by their government and still not question their motives. What is in your water? What is in your milk? America is an experiment and it is getting more absurd by the day.
blite13 3 years ago
Why don't you research what happens to a 757 flying at low altitude at that speed..While your at it, check out what EXPERT pilots who have flown military jets and commercial planes,say about the so called manuevers these amateur pilots,who couldn't even land a cessna plane,pulled off.They will tell the chances are 1 in a million.Research how many 1 in a million things happened that day.How bout the Norad ops that day?The stand down of military planes?Fema just happened to be in NY the day before
blite13 3 years ago
Uh huh, the sheer weight of the top made the building collapsed at close to free fall speed.
Yerizzo 3 years ago
Dahler is a tool. Good work Mr. Jennings.
pirskwayrd 3 years ago
Peter Jennings doing his job
grobmark 3 years ago
It sounds like the other reporter is trying to remind Jennings to just report the story and not speculate.
I guess some reporters are just better at these things than others.
redstar170 3 years ago
Isn't it funny how the people that sit around on YouTube are the kind of people that apparently try to promote these childish conspiracy theories...hahaha
TheSchubert21 4 years ago
we'll be heldding a public self town to town millitary army to fight this filty rich plot to destroy are american way of living. Power for the working people
bayuPR 4 years ago
lmao...you're a fucking subhuman piece of rat filth, a gulliable, non-thinking robot totally devoid of independent and rational analysis. Your "description" of this very Jennings excerpt is riddled with lies! He candidly stated that planned demolition may have been the cause of the twoer collapsing? Listen to what he actually says, douche! Go back to your mommy's basement where you belong, assface! rofl
PrezCRG 4 years ago
Well, PrezCRG makes a point I was going to make, but with too much bile. There there enough suspicious things about 911 without reading into Jenning's words. The other points he makes about so-called experts and observers are better. Jennings does not say it was *caused* by planned demolition, but it LOOKS like one, which it does. To apply the same skepticism about the experts comments, how would Jennings know that? Surely JamieP is not going to infer that Jennings knows something we don't know.
voidvox 4 years ago
fuc bush...it was a inside job..all you ppl who r brainwash...open your fuccen eye...steel melt at 2500+ degree..that sh!ttin flame that was comin out of the wtc wasnt even close to that number...get it thru your mind..bombs was planted in the wtc...
GoOfY1537 4 years ago
lo que son capaces de hacer yanquis de mierda para tener petroleo
gustavoaybar 4 years ago
9\11 was a pretext for CIA to result war
CreepingSorrow 4 years ago
Look you fools. I was there I saw the towers fall. It was an attack by jet airliners and the damn things burned like hell.
Cut the bullshit already. It was not a damn fake attack you damn fools !
FunnyHaHaFunnyHaHa 4 years ago
We've all heard the old "I was there - I ought to know!" story a dozen times. It proves nothing.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Don't use this footage to see the smoke puffs comming out of the building before and after it was falling. Very similar to demolition methods to keep a building from exploding or tipping over. You can notice in other footage how the building actually starts to tip then the bottom gives in.
underdode 4 years ago
i laugh at all of you who think this wasn't the first strike towards NWO hahahaha you all are fucked if you don't start waking up because, the next thing you know your going to have a new dollar, your going to have a new country and you going to have a little friend inside your skin that will hold all of you info. start waking up people!
andyladousa 4 years ago
If it had demolition at the bottom, then how were there survivors found that were in the tower lobbies exiting the building???
dodgerman88 4 years ago 2
who said it explosives were at the bottom. If you ever watch a tape of the towers going down, this time notice the puffs of smoke coming out of the windows and the sides of the bulding as it is falling. These little explosions weaken the steel beems(inside building) so a building implodes on itself instead of exploding outwards. They are triggered to go off one after the other... watch again and you'll notice. Very pecuiluar I'd say...
underdode 4 years ago
My videos are not the reason I believe 9/11 was an inside job - as the title says, they are merely "News Oddities" aimed at people who are already part of the 9/11 truth movement and have seen all the evidence for themselves.
As for directing you to my sources, I'm not going to spoon-feed you; I couldn't care less what you think and you can do the research for yourself (turning off the TV is a good place to start).
Jamiep84 4 years ago
"To be highly certain of something, with a very low order of evidence, or in contradiction to a mountain of evidence, is a sign that something is wrong with your mind" - Sam Harris
To even consider this as evidence of a conspiracy is absolutely ridiculous, using this to prove your point is a prime example of how un-credible your argument is.
rxhysen 4 years ago
There's more evidence out there to suggest a conspiracy than there is to suggest it was done by 19 Arabs with box cutters, so if you belive the latter, then maybe *you're* the one who has "something wrong with your mind".
Jamiep84 4 years ago
there are more stupid videos out there about conspiracies... with very little real evidence who's main creators are college kids. Most conspiracy theorist use things like this as their evidence which is embarrassing, there are endless amounts of scientific journals and papers explaining what happened to the towers as well as WTC 7. Take the time to look for them... you're going to have to read them and sadly thats where you lose most of conspiracy theorist's attention.
rxhysen 4 years ago 2
Well clearly they lost your attention because if you had studied papers by those who defend the official story such as NIST, Popular Mechanics, Purdue University etc, you'd have found them very lacking indeed from a scientific point of view.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
The conversation is clear- "like" a demolition and the weight of the top caused the collapse... NOT a demolition...
rick0289 4 years ago 4
It is a shame but many Americans want the government to Nannie them....they do not want to see anything.....they might have to wake up.....
PennyPatti 4 years ago
I have lost much respect for this government and have none for bush for so time now. But don't let your anger drive your common sense. I would agree that the news is fixed, to a point, however the all the footage i have seen to me says exactly what that reporter said. It collapsed from the top down. IT s hard not to trust your eyes
Killsworth 4 years ago
I'd like to be in a room alone with this Don Dahler for about five minutes...
41music 4 years ago
Your all full of shit, your just one of those people that think everything has to be a god damn conspiracy theory and its not. What you say here is offensive not only to America as a country but to the people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and the subsequent wars. It is simply un-American and bull shit that you would believe such nonsense. Read a god damn history book you idiots. Not EVERYTHING is a fucking conspiracy.
martiansunrise 4 years ago
hear hear!
countvoncount13 4 years ago 2
If you really investigated all of the information then you would see more clearly...there are too many Scholars that said it was impossible for the planes to take down those buildings because they were built with that in mind.
PennyPatti 4 years ago
so you are at the influence of all these government's lies and propaganda. Just think for a moment if it might be true, people done much more worst things. You think Bush is cool, and only place you see him is on TV. I think Bush is amazing, because he can kill and tell everybody that it wasn't him. I would say more if I knew english better.
elkelixo 4 years ago
Doesn't anyone think it strange that building 7 had not collapsed when they said it had...they knew and reported it a bit too soon.
PennyPatti 4 years ago
I read all of the time...and when you look at all of the evidence...the only conclusion is that it could not have happened the way they said it did...if there is any other answer, why do they stick to this lame explanation???
PennyPatti 4 years ago
alwaysyouramanda 4 years ago
what good is an answer
if we can do nothing about it?
alwaysyouramanda 4 years ago
Wow how enlightening. And of course we all know the holocust never happened, FDR knew of pearl harbor yadadadadadada and on and on and on it goes.
As a new Yorker who watched these towers fall infront of me I find this information ignorant and offensive.
But you can believe what ever you want.
scmtman 4 years ago
We've all heard the old "I should know - I was there!" story a dozen times. It proves nothing.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Regardless of opinion on 9/11 conspiracy theories, or lack thereof, I do find it very interesting that the conspiracy theories often are based upon information, and the nay sayers most often resort to simple rebuttals comprised of short sentences full of adjectives such as "crazy" or "loony". The conspiracy theories are comprised of heavy amount of research, effort, and of course, opinion. I expect the nay sayers to have the courage to respond in the same fashion.
10forRP 4 years ago 3
And one more thing... I do believe that many conspiracy theories and the supporters do come off as very radical and possibly "stupid". But some conspiracy theories are very well laid-out and do it in a professional manner. A good film to watch... zeitgeistmovie(dot)com
10forRP 4 years ago 2
Exactly, because if there was no evidence for any anomalies in the 'official' government account we'd all be happy to go away and leave it at that. However, it is very apparent that America has been hijacked by a corrupt government administration that is dragging the country into one war after another against the people's wishes. This is no democracy!
MattScottUK 4 years ago
You mean you saw it on TV? because thats what most people who were in new york that claimed to have seen this with their own eyes REALLY saw on that day.
agentzippo 4 years ago
If you were there and saw it with your own eyes, then you should be appalled at the lies the government is throwing at us. You were there! And you think that what you saw happened because of a plane and some fire?!?! These buildings are built to withstand so much more than that!!! And you believe the official story??? How sad.
ChartreuseMonkey 4 years ago
And yes, there are crazies out there, it's true. But this isn't one of those "I was molested by an alien" stories. This is serious. What the government is saying doesn't not match up with the videos, the photos, or the eye witness accounts. Plain and simple.
ChartreuseMonkey 4 years ago 2
Don Dalhler is full of shit!!! Reinvestigate 9/11 NOW!!! Impeach Bush and Cheney NOW!!!
sunvoltage 4 years ago 3
9/11 was an inside job. face the facts yank.
Dendiol 4 years ago
I've researched building 7 and yep! It collapsed because a 110 story building pretty much fell on it. The firemen even knew it was going to collapse prior to it actually collapsing...that's not much of a conspiracy if that knowledge was going around prior to the actual collapse. Get a life. Here's an idea for you: Research "getting laid!"
MGR1900 4 years ago
You sound like you're the one who never saw a pussy up close. You sound like a zit kid who wants attention because his mom never breast fed him. You're such an idiot it's funny to read you.
poprip 4 years ago
Nothing fell on building 7 and it only had small fires. Acquire clue before opening mouth, and spare us your lame-ass insults.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Oh, sorry. You were there. I forgot. You know more than the firefighters who just thought the building was significantly damaged. Dude, are you trying to be an major asshole or is it just coming naturally?
MGR1900 4 years ago
The firefighters never said WTC7 was "significantly damaged".
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Wow, who am to believe? The firefighters who were there who actually knew that the building was going to collapse or some anonymous asshole on the internet? Hmmmmm!
MGR1900 4 years ago
There were people who knew in advance that 7 was going to collapse - this in itself is highly suspicious, of course.
But nobody said it was "significantly damaged" so your comment was just plain wrong.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Dude! You're completely full of shit and misinformation (and truth be known, you actualy know it). It is well documented that the building was severly damaged according to reports on that day. So quit with the bullshit smoke and mirrors you pathetic liar! You apparently can't get laid so this is what you with your free time. You're playing games now, asshole.
MGR1900 4 years ago
The news media said they were "worried about WTC7 collapsing". Then the BBC and CNN reported its collapse before it actually happened (search for BBC WTC7).
As for whether or not it was damaged, you can look at the videos and see that it's hardly damaged at all. Also, when steel skyscrapers ARE damaged, they don't collapse straight down at free fall speed into a nice neat little pile of rubble.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Jamie, the news media doesn't worry about things. The news media reports stories. One of the stories they reported from firefighters and structural engineers on the scene was that WTC7 was going to collapse.
I look at the video and I see a large section falling towared the building. Perhaps you are watching something else. And lastly, you aren't a structural engineer so you aren't qualified to say how a building should collapse. I'm done with you. YOu're playing games.
MGR1900 4 years ago
When I said "they" were worried I meant the city officials allegedly on the scene, obviously.
No major debris hit WTC7, and if it had there'd have been a visible impact crater.
It doesn't take a structural engineer to tell you that straight-down collapses of steel structures at free fall speed doesn't happen because of minor fires. Or even large fires.
You are now blocked.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
It doesn't take a structural engineer. It simply takes citizens who will not just back and wave their little patriotic flags while the government tells them exactly what to think. Think for yourself!!
ChartreuseMonkey 4 years ago 2
Seriosly folks! The 15 minutes of fame for the 911 truthers has come and gone. It's time to start ripping some new anuses with these jerks. Nobody is taking them seriously. That's why they have to interupt Bill Mahar's live taping because nobody is paying attention to them. Rot in hell you filthy bastards!
MGR1900 4 years ago
no, YOU ot in hell, fucking sheep. People like you can only insult because you refuse to look at the FACTS that architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, air controllers, CIA veterans, military personnel and a whole lotta people came up with. Do a little research or shut the fuck up before insulting people who are awake and perfectly sane.
poprip 4 years ago
poprip apparently needs a girlfriend.
MGR1900 4 years ago
poprip, the jig is up. You leftist America haters are drowning in your own leftist vomit. You're not cool. You're clowns. Nobody likes you. And why don't you just go join those that would be more than happy to slit your throat with a dull knife. And then let's see you continue to claim that the gov attacked its own people. What a cock knocker you are.
MGR1900 4 years ago
you mix it all up, you think we endorse terrorists, you think everyone in the movement proclaims what the Truth is. You're wrong, and you can only insult because you don't know shit about the whole subject. There are enough FACTS, not political agendas, or utopist ideals, to justify another comission, a real independant inquiry. PERIOD. You sound like a german in the late '30s, by the way.
poprip 4 years ago 2
We? The movement? The only movement you seem to be a part of is the bowel movement because you are really full of it.
MGR1900 4 years ago
wow! I'm amazed at how subtle, intelligent and articulate you are. Too bad the freedom of speech is used by assholes like you. Hannity and you have alot in common.
It's funny because to me, what is really going down the toilet is the american Empire. When a country like Irak is kicking your butt, one can easily see that the downfall has begun. Good luck my dear right wing sheep.
poprip 4 years ago 2
poprip, your cheesy attempt to use smoke and mirrors to take emphasis away from the cold hard facts of 911 may work with the Nascar crowd however it doesn't work for educated Americans. The fact of the matter is the US was attacked by Muslim extremists. You know it. I know it. And most educated people know it. Get over it and be a man like God intended you to be.
MGR1900 4 years ago
First of all, let me tell you something: God is a joke. It doesn't exist. You know it. I know it. Neither does the sasquash, or Santa Claus. Then, I'm educated, and in fact I'm pretty sure I know more about history than you do. I went to university, and I know what I'm talking about. You don't, you use insults and moronic comments to back your weak opinion.There's still hope for you though.
poprip 4 years ago
"Then, I'm educated, and in fact I'm pretty sure I know more about history than you do."
Nice sentence structure. Yep, that sentence is pretty much coming from an educated individual not to mention the fact that your conversation has now been reduced to "I'm smarter than you." Kind of pathetic.
MGR1900 4 years ago
Maybe it's because english is not my first language my God-loving right wing content sheep. Don't miss the WWE tonight!
poprip 4 years ago
shill
jlamber71 4 years ago
pop, the reason why the country is going down the toilet is because we once had citizens who collectively put a man on the moon. Now we have citizens who believe in 911 fairy tales about massive gov cover ups. In other words, the intelligence level has gone down a lot. And you're, my little friend, are contributing to the big flush.
MGR1900 4 years ago
Sure, your belief in God is a huge indication of your intelligence. Just do a little research and use simple common sense and you'll discover that YOU are the person living in a big illusion. Go back to Fox News you don't want to miss Hannity and O'Reilly.
poprip 4 years ago 2
poprip, if pretending to "do research" gives you a feeling of empowerment, by all means, knock yourself out. If that's how you psychologically handle a tragic event like 911, then that's fine however please be cognizant of what's really going on. You aren't uncovering any massive coverup. All you are doing is giving yourself a sense of control. There are professional reporters who's job it is to investigate these matters. You aren't doing a better job than they are. Sorry.
MGR1900 4 years ago
I have a little question for you MGR1900. How many non-american lives are worth an american life?
Because as for now, it is around half a million innocent iraky civillians dead for 3000 american dead. Do the math, oh non wait you probably didn't go to school long enough...
jonathangregoire 4 years ago
jon, you're making the correlation between 911 and Iraq. You did that. Not me.
MGR1900 4 years ago
Well, the correlation is easy to make. Why are you in Irak then?
jonathangregoire 4 years ago
Irak? I don't know where that is.
MGR1900 4 years ago
I'm not surprised
jonathangregoire 4 years ago
It's called CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. That's what happened. It was perfect. Come down perfectly, saving lots of neighboring buildings from much damage. That's what controlled demolition does.
nothwind 4 years ago
come on people do you seriously think 3 wtc buildings could fall at free fall speeds exactly the same. maybe if 1 fell that ok i would believe but not 3!! hey next time you need a building blown up who are you gonna call 19 arabs with some airplanes? inside job!!!
jlamber71 4 years ago
jlamber, apparently structural engineers SERIOUSLY believe the buildings fell as they did. Are you a structural engineer? I didn't so. So stop pretending you are an expert, you worthless cock knocker. Get a life.
MGR1900 4 years ago
*I didn't think so!
MGR1900 4 years ago
I'm pretty sure you didn't read 3 lines of their pseudo report on it, because NIST (I'll let you search what it is) themselves now say (you can verify it but I'm sure you won't) they CAN'T explain the "collapse". So pleeeease, shut the fuck up, and go watch football you moron.
poprip 4 years ago
ah peter youre saying the wrong script please stop!
jlamber71 4 years ago
i am continually amazed at how paranoid, delusional and stupid so many people on Youtube are...starting with whoever created the text before and after this clip.
dougapepper 4 years ago
Go watch Fox News then, little sheep. :p
Jamiep84 4 years ago
I hate FOX news - way to conservative and aligned with current administration, which I hate. But, people who believe 9/11 was an inside job by our gov't need to have their head examined.
dougapepper 4 years ago
Search YouTube for "9/11 mysteries".
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Wow... is Bill Maher your Guru?
Insults is the only thing that you have left. You're pathetic, poor little slimy brain.
poprip 4 years ago
I think even more interesting is Jennings' mention of pearl harbor...
NikitasGuitars 4 years ago
Indeed. In fact, having watched his coverage in full, I think Jennings realized it was an inside job as soon as the first tower came down.
Jamiep84 4 years ago
Whether he thought that or not its very eerie.
NikitasGuitars 4 years ago
that's a point!
jonathangregoire 4 years ago
You guys are stupid. This video isn't suspiscious at all! You're just trying to make stuff out of nowhere that will support your desired result...of course, if this WERE scripted - this is just ABC...TONS of people would have to be in on it...and yet none have come forward admitting what you call the "truth"! Get a life please.
jetman1287 4 years ago
Funny how he heard no explosions yet there are countless accounts right here on youtube and at least one with the actually sound of a bomb.
timmyrichardson 4 years ago
To point 4, I see a building collapsing "in on itself" and not "exploding outward" in all videos of this event, so please stop trying to brainwash me with your interpretation.
ginsengbomb 4 years ago
I fail to see the point of this video. Is it supposed to somehow discredit the attack? I think it just seems to discredit the abilities of ABC news reporters.
Etni3s 4 years ago
the towers were blown to kingdom come. Their is absolutly no doubt. Controlled demolition from the top down. It is obvious that it had to be done this way. To fall where the planes hit. Concrete turned to dust before it hit the ground.
biskalero 4 years ago 2
Holy fuck I can't believe you waste this much time! It fucking falls at the top! You can see it from all of the other camera angles. You should've stayed in school!
AdamSonOfJohn 4 years ago
You appear to have missed the point of my video :p
Jamiep84 4 years ago
"Thank's Don, very much"
canuckdeerhunter26 4 years ago
Where is the "video evidence" that there was explosion at the base of the tower? And when did Peter Jennings get his degree in structural engineering? He was a pretty boy talking head. Conspiracy theorists crack me up. If anything, you certainly are entertaining. For your sake, I hope you're aware of how ridiculous you are. If you're serious, I would consider consulting a psychiatrist; you might be a paranoid schizophrenic.
jimyjam99 4 years ago
Go on America, take Don Dahler's word for it, he's incredibly perceptive and figured out how the building collapsed simply from witnessing it from afar.
Or you could be smart and realize that this buffoon has no clue of what caused these buildings to fall and was told what to say.
bouchsox 4 years ago
the top 1/4 of building collapses the foundation of same building where it is strongest , i no tink so.jet fuel isnt used to make steel melt.you need a oxygen forced under pressure to smelt steel(bessemer furnace?" if i am thinking right .
xtiml 4 years ago
WOW THAT REPORTER REALLY KNOWS HIS SHIT, what a description, must have studied structural engineering before being a reporter.
FUCKING CONSPIRACY. CANT FOOL USA YOU FUCKERS
nannytenerife 4 years ago
Long live Peter Jennings!
glimmer2158 4 years ago 2