well, add 6.7lbs (aprox) per gallon of fuel and you will have your total weight. That will be around 500 lbs. Any gyro that will handle 500 lbs. will work but consider shoulder width also. Maybe a tandem seating aircraft.would be better.
Also consider altitude. Your engines hp will drop 3% pet 1000 ft alt. (except turbo charged engines) so if you are flying at gross weight at sea level you may be under powered trying to atain a cruse alt. with that much weight.
@gyroplane99 Can you tell me what gyro could handle myself, 235lbs and another 150-200lbs plus fuel? I like the RAF 2000 but I don't know enough about any of them.
NO, never crashed.. It was a bit heavy but flew very well..see the videos. Am actually working on a new gyroplane I will call the Craft model 100. It is to be a tractor design, single place, and this time a four stroke engine. I may put it's development progress on youtube so everyone can follow it.
Something this device too hard flied and with the great pleasure landed. At it that, bearing details from pig-iron, and a cabin from a tin?))))))))))))))
Not in insult it will be told, but it flies not important!
Why need more reliability with an autogyro? If the engine fails you won't crash, it's enough to keep looking for a good spot to land while flying for the case the engine dies.
I think the thrust line is very high but I don't have one so what do I know?
You know gyros are like guns! they are in the hands of unsafe.unqualfied people,get some helo and aircraft training and really learn how to fly! you can't do it your self like skiing or snowboarding, Good Luck!
The pilot/designer of this aircraft (still alive) has a BS degree, worked for Bell Helicopter for several years, Is a commercial pilot, airplane and rotorcraft, has logged well over 8,000 flight hours and has been in aviation for over 30 years.... not a novice!
But you are right about the need for trainning and caution.
Incidently the centerline of thrust must be high to keep the rotor loaded. The aircraft was extremely stable and safe.
You know gyros are like guns! they are in the hands of unsafe.unqualfied people,get some helo and aircraft training and really learn how to fly! you can't do it your self like skiing or snowboarding, Good Luck!
This aircraft was a real deathtrap, and for just the reason he stated. Non-centerline thrust is another recipe for disaster, as is the pod lateral area which is impossible to compensate for with vertical stabilizer area aft. Power off it was nearly uncontrollable.
If I'm not mistaken, this aircraft did eventually crash, killing the pilot/designer.
I can assure you that the pilot/designer is alive and quite well! The aircraft was not as unstable as you suggest, though there is always room for improvement with such designs.
It's been my experience that 99% of the people who make such comments don't actually *know* what "stability" means. There's more than one kind, and stick-free stability means absolutely NOTHING in gyros.
As you are obviously knowledgeable about stability, perhaps you could illuminate further? What different kinds are there and what are the implications for Gyro design?
I can't put it all in this limited space, but suffice it to say that what matters here is negative stick-FIXED pitch stability. That's what causes gyros to "bunt over" under power, as the Brits say. Other problems with this gyro are asymetrical thrust with a failed engine and negative yaw stability power off.
question ! on a two place side by side with one person , is there a problem with weight ?
SethJohnston17 2 weeks ago
well, add 6.7lbs (aprox) per gallon of fuel and you will have your total weight. That will be around 500 lbs. Any gyro that will handle 500 lbs. will work but consider shoulder width also. Maybe a tandem seating aircraft.would be better.
Also consider altitude. Your engines hp will drop 3% pet 1000 ft alt. (except turbo charged engines) so if you are flying at gross weight at sea level you may be under powered trying to atain a cruse alt. with that much weight.
gyroplane99 6 months ago
you ask an question, I answer it, any you call it spam.....?????
gyroplane99 9 months ago
@gyroplane99 Can you tell me what gyro could handle myself, 235lbs and another 150-200lbs plus fuel? I like the RAF 2000 but I don't know enough about any of them.
EloyBestwanger 6 months ago
Has it been confirmed that it crashed with pilot in it? If so, where and when?
regards,
LLuE88 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LLuE88
NO, never crashed.. It was a bit heavy but flew very well..see the videos. Am actually working on a new gyroplane I will call the Craft model 100. It is to be a tractor design, single place, and this time a four stroke engine. I may put it's development progress on youtube so everyone can follow it.
gyroplane99 10 months ago
Very nice love the idea of two engines but what happens if one conks out?
Giddimskennels 2 years ago
Something this device too hard flied and with the great pleasure landed. At it that, bearing details from pig-iron, and a cabin from a tin?))))))))))))))
Not in insult it will be told, but it flies not important!
478282209 2 years ago
It's cool how the trailer slams into the belly when the mains roll off.
Hodag1000 2 years ago 2
Why need more reliability with an autogyro? If the engine fails you won't crash, it's enough to keep looking for a good spot to land while flying for the case the engine dies.
I think the thrust line is very high but I don't have one so what do I know?
rcairpower 2 years ago
Maybe he was planning on flying over water. Being able to gently descend to the ground doesn't do you much good when there is no ground.
221b 2 years ago
Give the cameraman another beer!
Downfacingdog 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's a great invention , a helicopter that needs a run way ...I wonder what else you're going to invent ,,
CannabisCure 3 years ago
looks heavy, took a long time to lift off, plus ouch on the cost that must be like 30k plus to built
oakland002 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
im on cam and bored
SOMEONE TALK TO ME vT
Customwatcher6 3 years ago
comment me back
comment me back NP
Circa232 3 years ago
might want to work on that trailer unloading technique.
miketacoma5 3 years ago
For real hah!
PineappleOranges 3 years ago
Nice flying, looks great!
FireFerret2222 3 years ago
Good eye queenslandferal!
RikeJunq 3 years ago
You know gyros are like guns! they are in the hands of unsafe.unqualfied people,get some helo and aircraft training and really learn how to fly! you can't do it your self like skiing or snowboarding, Good Luck!
mytemight 3 years ago
The pilot/designer of this aircraft (still alive) has a BS degree, worked for Bell Helicopter for several years, Is a commercial pilot, airplane and rotorcraft, has logged well over 8,000 flight hours and has been in aviation for over 30 years.... not a novice!
But you are right about the need for trainning and caution.
Incidently the centerline of thrust must be high to keep the rotor loaded. The aircraft was extremely stable and safe.
jcraft99 3 years ago
you have to have a license with it anyway, has more than one engine...
DFX2K9 3 years ago
You know gyros are like guns! they are in the hands of unsafe.unqualfied people,get some helo and aircraft training and really learn how to fly! you can't do it your self like skiing or snowboarding, Good Luck!
mytemight 3 years ago
Looked safe enough to me. That is the coolest gyro ive seen yet. Thanks for the vid.
razed1022 4 years ago
You freaks over-think stuff. Just watch the nice video for what it is and don't pick apart every frickin' frame...jeez
bigzipper 4 years ago
Watch the Gyro try to PPO (3:13min)on initial take off. The thrust line is way too high!
queenslandferal 4 years ago
Wrong dude, the rotor freely rotates and there is no torque associated with that system. It flys straight.
banditrider06 4 years ago
Asymmetrical thrust with a gyro plane looks a bit dodgy. The gyro would want to rotate at low speeds.
farmerted55555 4 years ago
yep he died in a front over crash !
mmdghr 4 years ago
No way on Gods green earth is this gyro part 103. No way.
welby2007 4 years ago
We've got to get more tractor style gyro's in the air.
jimsterJ 4 years ago
tuttt99 is absolutely correct.
This aircraft was a real deathtrap, and for just the reason he stated. Non-centerline thrust is another recipe for disaster, as is the pod lateral area which is impossible to compensate for with vertical stabilizer area aft. Power off it was nearly uncontrollable.
If I'm not mistaken, this aircraft did eventually crash, killing the pilot/designer.
lepton250 4 years ago
ironic isnt it? :P
lordazn 4 years ago
I can assure you that the pilot/designer is alive and quite well! The aircraft was not as unstable as you suggest, though there is always room for improvement with such designs.
thatbrock 4 years ago
It's been my experience that 99% of the people who make such comments don't actually *know* what "stability" means. There's more than one kind, and stick-free stability means absolutely NOTHING in gyros.
lepton250 4 years ago
As you are obviously knowledgeable about stability, perhaps you could illuminate further? What different kinds are there and what are the implications for Gyro design?
thatbrock 4 years ago
I can't put it all in this limited space, but suffice it to say that what matters here is negative stick-FIXED pitch stability. That's what causes gyros to "bunt over" under power, as the Brits say. Other problems with this gyro are asymetrical thrust with a failed engine and negative yaw stability power off.
lepton250 4 years ago
It look cool but, I hope it's in line with federal aviation regulations!
Scoused5000 4 years ago
cool
DANDthekid 5 years ago
Chicken
ranchoroncho 5 years ago
Doesn't look safe to me. The line of thrust appears to be WAY to far above the center of mass
tuttt99 5 years ago