As a kid, I didn't want Intellivision b/c I didn't like the looks of the control pads. They looked too complicated, more like calculators, and there was no joystick.
and this what started the console war ppl oh yea and also in todays console war....lol there never was a console war its all bluff n bs talk i really dont care which is better theres always a flaw in a console n there always replaceable if it breaks down so pretty much i like all of the 3 the wii for its nostalgia store the 360 for its online and the ps3 for its online and the ps store for its multimedia selection
That end graphic when it says Intellivision Lives. That guy looks like the Jump Man Jr. guy. But JJj was not on this system. Is it just a coincidence? I guess back then most running characters all looked similar. Awesome commercial, thanks for posting this stuff.
@darthvadr2341 If it's not then they're pretty damn close. But given the fact that this commercial was in 81 and the NES comm was in 86 then it's a pretty good possibility that it is. They look about five years in age difference. The Kicker is their voices though. Listen to them, side by side. Tone, inflection, and pace are both the same.
I am really sorry but you seem to have confused yourself with whom I was speaking of. I was talking about the young kid. George Plimpton was born in 1927, so unless the Intellivision and Atari were made in the late 30s then I do not think that he could have been in this particular commercial as a preteen. I think you should try to find the name of the young actor then see if they are the same. I have still not been able to find out his name... good luck.
I was around when this was all we had. But Intellivision was better than Atari. Intellivision had way better graphics. Atari games look like a 3 year old did them with overly simple graphics and no detail or 3-D imaging. Yes, they both look incredibly primitive and pathetic compared to the games we have now. But at the time, it was sure a step up from Telstar's Pong.
You know, if only they named the device "I-Vision" similar to what Apple-Corp does to all it's newly released devices, just add an "I" in front and hoards of A-holes worldwide would buy the shitty thing and pass it off as good, just a thought :)
This commercial really pissed me off in 1982 but the only Intellivision game there that really stood out was Space Battle. That game was a lot of fun and very advanced for the day. The others were "meh"...
There was nothing wrong with the controllers. Do you know how many directions of movement the disc has over the Atari 2600 controller? Or how about how many buttons it has compared to the Atari 2600? Those buttons all mean one thing to me, more options. But hey you can't help that one controller that looks like a young black boy's penis with ONE button shaped like a slice carrot works better for you.
Yeah, I agree... Intellivision controllers are fine for the most part. Colecovision controllers are even worse! They only take in 8 different joystick directions! XD
I am surprised at how many buttons are on an Intellivision controller. It actually has 1 button more than an Xbox 360 controller. Wow, and to think that I use this to play Popeye.
For more info about this commercial, and the Atari vs. Intellivision war, check out an article from the New York Times, Dec. 14, 1981, on microfilm or the Times website.
Oh yeah, comptetitors were trying to cash in on the franchise. Why not copy Atari?
It's kind of like how today's games look similar to one another. When I play Saint's Row, I'm thinking to myself, "Wow! It's just like Grand Theft Auto!"
Hmmmmm... I wouldn't exactly say that Atari games were easier to play. Alot of your Intellivision games had an auto-fire button, while as none of the Atari games really did.
well a lot of people do would you rather play atari deffender or deffender on colecovision. the graffics are tremendoes on coleco, but look primative and silly on atari
Intellivision's better graphics were negated by the awful controllers. AstroBLAST was more fun to play than AstroSMASH (Astroblast was Mattel's simplified version of Astrosmash for the 2600). In fact most of the Mattel games released for the 2600 were easier to play.
ATARI IS BETTER NO qUESTION BETTER GAMES IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN BETTER GRAPHICS LIKE COMPARE AN NES GAME TO A 360 OR PS3 GAME THE NES GAMES ARE FAR MORE FUN THATS WHY I ONLY PLAY THE CLASSICS AND NOT THE NEW SHITTY ONE,AND BACK TO WHAT I SAID EARLYER ATARI WAS BETTER :P.
Intv commercials sucked. If only they had hired a spokesperson who was "cooler" and looked like someone who actually played video games in his spare time. Besides, there's no way that some nerdy "I didn't know" kid would win me over to Mattel's side.
Aha, Intellivision doesn't quite beat Atari there, who has the least precise controls? Intellivision. "I didn't know!" Well, now you know that Atari is the way to go with better controls.
The intellivision games were better so all I had to do was re-engineer the controls which I did and everything worked great. But your right I don't know why mattel did not improve the controls even when they came out with the second version they were not much better just a little.
These commercials sparked the world's first Console war advertising, and while both systems were before I was born, it still paved the way for the next gen wars of today.
Why don't we see more video game commercials like this today? Why not do a side-by-side comparison to show off technical capabilities? If you want to sell me something, then give me a firsthand demonstration!
Intv was way ahead of it's time. I was much happier with the games that required a little bit of thought rather than just mashing an atari dot or stick that was supposed to be a graphics. Not to mention the crappiest joystick ever.
The Atari 2600 joystick works fine. I have all original joysticks with my Atari 2600 (made in 1978). And fun matters more, and Atari 2600 is way more fun than Intellivision, with games like Space Invaders, Pitfall, Asteroids, Missile Command, Pole Position, and much more.
People who had to rely on that horrible, Intellivision disc controller shouldn't say anything about the Atari VCS/2600 joysticks (and paddles, by the way). Besides, the crappiest joystick ever was clearly that piece of crap that came with the Colecovision....
Intv was indeed ahead of its time, but the graphics were slow and there weren't enough "fun" games to justify its high price. I liked night stalker and space battle, but Atari was a fun system. That's what really matters.
Exactly. I can't play anything on Intellivision with those god awful controllers. Almost every Intellivision game released in a simplified 2600 version by M-Network was more fun to play.
I'm not saying that the InTV or the VCS sucked, but just a recital from history.
When Atari lost against Activision, everyone, including Quaker Oats, made games on the consoles which flooded the market with terrible product. Then the VIC-20 and the C64 came out and undercut everyone because of their vertical integration and aggressive marketing.
Yes, but not much later, there was NES, which pwns all. And my Atari (from 1978) still sits hooked-up to my TV, while if I had an Intellivision, it would be in the trash along with my Macintosh (which I smashed for crashing). And C64 is technically a home computer, and really can't be compared to dedicated gaming machines.
Well, that would be about 3-4 years later when the NES comes out.
Part of it was Nintendo's formula: control over 3rd parties and keeping it simple but powerful, which helped it to compete against "home computers" in gaming.
But, the NES still ran on Commodore. The main Ricoh CPU is derived from the MOS 6502, also used in the VIC-20, the 1541 disk drive, the Apple II, and even a variant of it was used as part of the Stella chipset in the 2600 VCS.
The Ricoh 6502-based CPUs were used only for the NES. The systems I mentioned used the 6502 by MOS and not a variant by Ricoh while the Atari used what's known as the MOS 6507, which is a 6502 short of a few features.
As for the C64, there is one reality about that computer. Although it was definitely capable of work, we have to fess up to one thing about it: the C64 was famous primarily for gaming.
Atari was *NOT* an 8-bit system. Not even close! Atari 2600 could barely handle 4k of ram. 8-bit systems were the original NES and the Sega Master System. As for Intellvision, it's credited as being the first 16-bit system.
I grew up in st.louis mo i was the only kid on my block who had a intelevison and i had alllllllll the games everbody else had ATARI which was a peace of shit
"I didn't know..."
WELL WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU KNOW?!?!
ProjectRealism 2 months ago
ICBINAVGN FTW!
fs10inator 2 months ago
As a kid, I didn't want Intellivision b/c I didn't like the looks of the control pads. They looked too complicated, more like calculators, and there was no joystick.
jksonny 3 months ago
and this what started the console war ppl oh yea and also in todays console war....lol there never was a console war its all bluff n bs talk i really dont care which is better theres always a flaw in a console n there always replaceable if it breaks down so pretty much i like all of the 3 the wii for its nostalgia store the 360 for its online and the ps3 for its online and the ps store for its multimedia selection
HYPNOGLANCE87 6 months ago
Space Armada? Fuckers stole Space Invaders.
KartKing4ever 6 months ago
Advertising by actually saying who you are better then... That would lead to so many lawsuits today...
MadaraStv 6 months ago
Three people don't know.
qtfan1121 7 months ago
I didn't know!!!! XD
TheYayuga9000 7 months ago
I know they are comparable...
kinmanyuen 8 months ago
dear,inteliivision productions
who do you prefer? nintendo or sega?
sincerly,spartan
spartan2222222222222 8 months ago
I love how both the top comments are the same exact thing....
AtariMaxx 8 months ago 3
Thumbs up for DLAbaoaqu.
Spagettieater9000 9 months ago 26
Comment removed
HumongousSoundtracks 9 months ago
3 people work for Other Companies
ProManUnitedFan 9 months ago
Once you go black, you never go back.
southport97 9 months ago
THIS is where the whole "I didnt know!" clip came from. I always though it came from a "C" list movie or something.
baahhhFATALITY11 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I didn't know.
JeterSwisherFan88 9 months ago
The funny thing is, now no one has any space games. First person shooters killed the genre...
fearguis 9 months ago 4
I STILL DIDN'T KNOW
MetaSponge64 9 months ago
I didn't know
ProManUnitedFan 9 months ago
i never knowned
orbitoverthesun 9 months ago
3 peoples didn't know
ant64423 9 months ago
Compare the crappy disc controller compared to atari's Joystick.. that was the down fall of intellivision in my opinion.
bigdaddykool1 10 months ago
@bigdaddykool1 Intellivision has a crappy controller? I DIDN'T KNOW!!
ProManUnitedFan 6 months ago
ahhh i born in the lovely snes era
Butters644 10 months ago
LOVE ATARI,LOVE INTELLIVISION.
franklinpriante 10 months ago
ICBINAVGN sent me here
ProManUnitedFan 10 months ago 5
@ProManUnitedFan I DIDN'T KNOW!
ftolmsteen 9 months ago
@ftolmsteen I knew!!
ProManUnitedFan 9 months ago
I can't beleive it's not AVGN sent me here.
gamenerd4444 10 months ago 4
I knew!
Tosaden 10 months ago
I didn't know!
kirbypenpal 11 months ago
SPACE ARMADA = SPACE INVADERS
vipercannonmafia 11 months ago 2
That end graphic when it says Intellivision Lives. That guy looks like the Jump Man Jr. guy. But JJj was not on this system. Is it just a coincidence? I guess back then most running characters all looked similar. Awesome commercial, thanks for posting this stuff.
hootyhaha 1 year ago
In our commercials every single comparison product is called X , cuz we're simply not allowed to name other products. :(
ZunnieShine 1 year ago
And knowing is half the... aaw I cant do it.
Thatlankydude1232 1 year ago
3 people still don't know.
MaskedOddity 1 year ago
@cdw626 I saw watch?v=69_l1oZ2b2M and you were right it was him.
abiel998 1 year ago
In Soviet Russia, you did know.
MrBarrelroll42 1 year ago 5
@MrBarrelroll42 KGB knew their shit back then, maaan!
Agent1W 11 months ago
"I can't believe it's not AVGN : I didn't know!"
reggiardito 1 year ago 12
2 people didn't know!
sunlexlo 1 year ago
i still do'nt know!
orbitoverthesun 1 year ago
I DON'T KNOW!
fattoler 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i didnt know either!
Mathiaxzz 1 year ago
Holy crap! Is that the same kid in the Nintendo commercial for the Legend of Zelda!?! The one where they rap... Here check it out: watch?v=69_l1oZ2b2M
Put that in after the youtube address, I'm pretty sure that's the same kid.
cdw626 1 year ago 3
@cdw626 HO-LY SHIT.
Owneador1337 1 year ago
@cdw626 i don't think it is, take a good look at the 2 of them
darthvadr2341 1 year ago
@darthvadr2341 If it's not then they're pretty damn close. But given the fact that this commercial was in 81 and the NES comm was in 86 then it's a pretty good possibility that it is. They look about five years in age difference. The Kicker is their voices though. Listen to them, side by side. Tone, inflection, and pace are both the same.
cdw626 1 year ago
@cdw626 NES = 1985 (In North America, Europe, and Australia), 1983 (In Japan).
ragnarock86 1 year ago
@cdw626 They aren't. I looked them up and George Plimpton was never in a LoZ ad
supersteelpokemon 1 year ago
@supersteelpokemon
I am really sorry but you seem to have confused yourself with whom I was speaking of. I was talking about the young kid. George Plimpton was born in 1927, so unless the Intellivision and Atari were made in the late 30s then I do not think that he could have been in this particular commercial as a preteen. I think you should try to find the name of the young actor then see if they are the same. I have still not been able to find out his name... good luck.
cdw626 1 year ago
Intellivision space games sucked. They were all "slow". In fact, Astrosmash played better on Atari as Astroblast.
TheLastBrainLeft 1 year ago
I Knew
ohhrichie 1 year ago
At least I know now and didn't have to embarrass myself in that commercial like the kid there.
notyoursavior78 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DLAbaoaqu sent me
metalWeirdo77 1 year ago
Guys! Calm down! HE DIDN'T KNOW, BACK OFF OF THE POOR KID!
Bobofjudia 1 year ago 4
"Check out the enclosed instruction book."
norsemustang 1 year ago
RIP George Plimpton
LeoFan93 1 year ago
DLAbaoaqu uses the 'I didn't know' quote A LOT in his videos.
MrJoshuaSalway1990 1 year ago
@MrJoshuaSalway1990 I DIDN'T KNOW!
nosound98 1 year ago
I didn't know!
WHAT DO YOU KNOW NERD!!
1nespower 1 year ago 2
Hey guys guess what? I didn't know!
TehCreeper45 1 year ago
Great console, great commercial, thanks for uploading.
MattTheSaiyan 1 year ago
I DIDN'T KNOW
DukeNukem500 1 year ago
I Didn't Know!
Irate. You suck ass.
Jakeallen86 1 year ago 4
"Wow, the games look really cool, but why did you give me this piece of shit controller to play them with?!"
no1cp 1 year ago 8
I was around when this was all we had. But Intellivision was better than Atari. Intellivision had way better graphics. Atari games look like a 3 year old did them with overly simple graphics and no detail or 3-D imaging. Yes, they both look incredibly primitive and pathetic compared to the games we have now. But at the time, it was sure a step up from Telstar's Pong.
bandcouver 1 year ago
@bandcouver
So Intellivision had games that could compare with Atari's Solaris, Tunnel Runner, Jr. Pacman, Battlezone, Pitfall II ect?
Intellivision even had their claim to fame sports titles blown away when Atari introduced the Real Sports and Super Sports series of games.
Pick any good Intelly game and odds are the 2600 has a half dozen similar titles that were as good or better from its vast library of games.
19psi 1 year ago
I didn't know.
Until I watched AVGN review of Intellivision.
Mesina2 1 year ago
You know, if only they named the device "I-Vision" similar to what Apple-Corp does to all it's newly released devices, just add an "I" in front and hoards of A-holes worldwide would buy the shitty thing and pass it off as good, just a thought :)
b4gm4n 1 year ago
you're an "I"-hole!
stads24 1 year ago
@b4gm4n yeah so they would later sue apple for copying their name so that all ipod's, iphones, and ipadss never existed
TeamGalinnie 1 year ago
And just how are they supposed to be better than the Atari titles?
bagthesecond 1 year ago
@bagthesecond once you compare...you'll know
Muffincakeswithsugar 1 year ago 2
i don't know!
supergamma2010 1 year ago 3
I DIDN'T KNOW!
Muffincakeswithsugar 1 year ago
I didn't know!
DJCuell 1 year ago 42
Back when "SPACE!!" was it's own game genre.
gdement 2 years ago 4
I DIDN'T KNOW
SaintLizard 2 years ago 64
@SaintLizard lmao
splldrong 5 months ago
Haha the kid is all the time like "I didn't know! I didn't know!"
Freakingpanda1 2 years ago
This is the genesis of the Mac vs. PC commercials.
1moreastronaut 2 years ago 5
Intellivision is a great system I love astrosmash.
fgfan19 2 years ago
Too bad the controllers sucked ass!!
SicSolution 2 years ago
Oh God, such primative games!
bukster1 2 years ago
I didn't know!!!!!!
kritiker14 2 years ago
Man, back in this day, it was like watching McCain and Obama ads! Hahaha! Always attacking each other, comparing systems.
NES classed things up with their commercials. Just NES. Nothing else.
dogeymon83 2 years ago
He totally stole that kid's thunder. What an arrogant bully.
america20xy 2 years ago 2
I want an intellivision! :)
ASTROSMASH!
pancakejarsrfun 2 years ago
i was an Odyssey 2 kid
stilleavy 2 years ago
I remember one saturday in the middle of summer vacation, playing it all day, leaving the game paused and turned on to pee, eat, and sleep.
Get up the next morning, and keep on rocking.
Except for the time the power went out...I was trying to get a high score on astrosmash for that contest they had....
pilgrimomega 2 years ago
God I used to play Astrosmash for HOURS
AToughF150 2 years ago
This commercial really pissed me off in 1982 but the only Intellivision game there that really stood out was Space Battle. That game was a lot of fun and very advanced for the day. The others were "meh"...
mcorleonep 2 years ago
Atari > Colecovision > Intellivision
thejobe 2 years ago
Unfortunately for Plimpton, those games on Atari were classics while those Intellivision space games were nothing.
fjccommish 2 years ago
The only people who said that Atari was classic are those who didn't compare its games to competitors.
While Atari was good for the time, competitors like Odyssey 2, Intellivision, and Colecovision wiped them out with their games.
"Once you compare, you'll know." XD
adog262 2 years ago
Sorry, the blips and bloops on Intellivision may have been better, but Atari had the games that were more fun to play.
fjccommish 2 years ago
Oh really! Did you beat Astroids or Space Invaders? :?
Are you telling me that games are more fun to play just because they were called "Atari" games? We don't want "Atari", we want video games! :)
adog262 2 years ago
Asteroids and Space Invaders were on Atari.
fjccommish 2 years ago
I know, but I asked if you beat them.
adog262 2 years ago
I don't recall it being possible to "beat" either game. They just went on and on.
fjccommish 2 years ago
Yeah, my general rule is that if one could get 100,000 points or more, then they beat a game.
adog262 2 years ago
Then I beat them.
fjccommish 2 years ago
Cool.
adog262 2 years ago
"Here, you try"
"But this controller sucks, sir"
"Shut up, kid"
"What's with this stupid disc? Where's the joystick like Atari, sir?"
"Shut up kid, and play the goddamn game"
Seriously though, Intellivision was a great console. Just badly designed controllers, which was a recurring problem in the early '80s.
wildsmiley 2 years ago 4
There was nothing wrong with the controllers. Do you know how many directions of movement the disc has over the Atari 2600 controller? Or how about how many buttons it has compared to the Atari 2600? Those buttons all mean one thing to me, more options. But hey you can't help that one controller that looks like a young black boy's penis with ONE button shaped like a slice carrot works better for you.
sinistermoon 2 years ago
Yeah, I agree... Intellivision controllers are fine for the most part. Colecovision controllers are even worse! They only take in 8 different joystick directions! XD
I am surprised at how many buttons are on an Intellivision controller. It actually has 1 button more than an Xbox 360 controller. Wow, and to think that I use this to play Popeye.
adog262 2 years ago
The Jaguar wins! It has more buttons on it's controller than any three consoles combined. LOL!
cessnaace 2 years ago
The Atari 5200 controller actually had more buttons than the Jaguar controller.
robotwo 2 years ago
Really? I don't have one. Did the 5200 controllers use overlays, the way the Intellivision and Jaguar did?
STAY AWESOME!
cessnaace 2 years ago
yupp , the 5200 used overlays aswell , but I didn't play with a original controller when I did play it since the original controllers broke :(
robotwo 2 years ago
Yes, I have heard about the unreliablity of the 5200 controllers. thanks for sitting me straight.
STAY AWESOME!
cessnaace 2 years ago
Yeah, good thing that you can repair them nowadays.
adog262 2 years ago
Space Armada (Intellivision), ripoff from Space Invaders (Atari & Midway)
Jay9928 2 years ago
For more info about this commercial, and the Atari vs. Intellivision war, check out an article from the New York Times, Dec. 14, 1981, on microfilm or the Times website.
tvtimetravel 2 years ago
george plimpton sure showed him. ;-)
daveheel 2 years ago
Space Armada?! Look at the game, it's almost similar to Space Invaders! Man, what copycats...
adog262 2 years ago 3
Every system had a Space Invaders clone.
The problem with Intellivision "space" games was not the graphics, but the speed. Atari games were more fun to play because they were arcade fast.
TheLastBrainLeft 2 years ago 3
Oh yeah, comptetitors were trying to cash in on the franchise. Why not copy Atari?
It's kind of like how today's games look similar to one another. When I play Saint's Row, I'm thinking to myself, "Wow! It's just like Grand Theft Auto!"
Hmmmmm... I wouldn't exactly say that Atari games were easier to play. Alot of your Intellivision games had an auto-fire button, while as none of the Atari games really did.
adog262 2 years ago
i didnt know?!
ZacharyDuhamel 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I still prefer Atari because there's more games, and today, nobody cares which twenty-five year old console had better graphics.
Koolkitties 3 years ago
well a lot of people do would you rather play atari deffender or deffender on colecovision. the graffics are tremendoes on coleco, but look primative and silly on atari
ZacharyDuhamel 3 years ago
Intellivision's better graphics were negated by the awful controllers. AstroBLAST was more fun to play than AstroSMASH (Astroblast was Mattel's simplified version of Astrosmash for the 2600). In fact most of the Mattel games released for the 2600 were easier to play.
TheLastBrainLeft 2 years ago
In your opinion perhaps. For me Astrosmash was the better version. Astroblast was stripped down for the Atari's limitations.
sinistermoon 2 years ago
I love Intellivision!!! :)
memphiselle 3 years ago
i didnt know!?
ZacharyDuhamel 3 years ago
To this day I don't know anyone that had a Intellivision back then. Me and my mates all had Ataris. Still got mine in fact !!!
howitreallyis7 3 years ago
Ooh...that's so exciting...real exploding sounds!
jazziesax 3 years ago
I didn't know
Constitusean 3 years ago
ATARI IS BETTER NO qUESTION BETTER GAMES IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN BETTER GRAPHICS LIKE COMPARE AN NES GAME TO A 360 OR PS3 GAME THE NES GAMES ARE FAR MORE FUN THATS WHY I ONLY PLAY THE CLASSICS AND NOT THE NEW SHITTY ONE,AND BACK TO WHAT I SAID EARLYER ATARI WAS BETTER :P.
WULFY1993 3 years ago
Intv commercials sucked. If only they had hired a spokesperson who was "cooler" and looked like someone who actually played video games in his spare time. Besides, there's no way that some nerdy "I didn't know" kid would win me over to Mattel's side.
Skylinesandsunsets 3 years ago
Aha, Intellivision doesn't quite beat Atari there, who has the least precise controls? Intellivision. "I didn't know!" Well, now you know that Atari is the way to go with better controls.
GameGuyTroy 3 years ago
The intellivision games were better so all I had to do was re-engineer the controls which I did and everything worked great. But your right I don't know why mattel did not improve the controls even when they came out with the second version they were not much better just a little.
bigdog49094 3 years ago
space armada? i woulda sued over that game, space armada = space invaders
cal2jack 3 years ago
Right! Mattel made a copy of the game, and even made it better.
an147 3 years ago 3
he keep eggin it on... "I DIDN'T FUCKIN KNOW! ok calm down, kid!" lmao
Whitehawkup 3 years ago
These commercials sparked the world's first Console war advertising, and while both systems were before I was born, it still paved the way for the next gen wars of today.
BlackWolfessUSCM 3 years ago
even if you do side by side comparisons of the graphics doesnt mean the intellivision is better than the atari 2600. I love the Atari 2600.
slimer145 3 years ago
"Once you compare, you'll know" - catchy eh?
mcan4287 3 years ago 5
He didn't know, alright? Leave the kid alone, Plimpton.
sakura4000 3 years ago 10
I DIDN'T KNOW.
ifhgsfj 3 years ago 2
quote "I didn't know"
nonmez190 3 years ago
Mr. Intellivision: 1927-2003 RIP
snakes3425 3 years ago 6
Space Armada = Space Invaders
snakes3425 3 years ago
these were the most hardcore console wars of all time.
Ishykawa 4 years ago
Indeed..........
memphiselle 3 years ago
Why don't we see more video game commercials like this today? Why not do a side-by-side comparison to show off technical capabilities? If you want to sell me something, then give me a firsthand demonstration!
SkyfireTheFox 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fuck Intellivision! Atari 2600 kicks Intellivision's ass. Intellivision is for posers.
VaderNES 4 years ago
Intv was way ahead of it's time. I was much happier with the games that required a little bit of thought rather than just mashing an atari dot or stick that was supposed to be a graphics. Not to mention the crappiest joystick ever.
fawdown 4 years ago
The Atari 2600 joystick works fine. I have all original joysticks with my Atari 2600 (made in 1978). And fun matters more, and Atari 2600 is way more fun than Intellivision, with games like Space Invaders, Pitfall, Asteroids, Missile Command, Pole Position, and much more.
VaderNES 4 years ago
People who had to rely on that horrible, Intellivision disc controller shouldn't say anything about the Atari VCS/2600 joysticks (and paddles, by the way). Besides, the crappiest joystick ever was clearly that piece of crap that came with the Colecovision....
Xervosh23 4 years ago 2
Intv was indeed ahead of its time, but the graphics were slow and there weren't enough "fun" games to justify its high price. I liked night stalker and space battle, but Atari was a fun system. That's what really matters.
Skylinesandsunsets 3 years ago
Exactly. I can't play anything on Intellivision with those god awful controllers. Almost every Intellivision game released in a simplified 2600 version by M-Network was more fun to play.
TheLastBrainLeft 2 years ago
Maybe you have god awful hands because I never have had a problem with the controllers and I have been playing Intellivision for over 23 years.
sinistermoon 2 years ago
The Commodore 64 buried both of those machines.
I'm not saying that the InTV or the VCS sucked, but just a recital from history.
When Atari lost against Activision, everyone, including Quaker Oats, made games on the consoles which flooded the market with terrible product. Then the VIC-20 and the C64 came out and undercut everyone because of their vertical integration and aggressive marketing.
Watcher3223 4 years ago
Yes, but not much later, there was NES, which pwns all. And my Atari (from 1978) still sits hooked-up to my TV, while if I had an Intellivision, it would be in the trash along with my Macintosh (which I smashed for crashing). And C64 is technically a home computer, and really can't be compared to dedicated gaming machines.
VaderNES 4 years ago
Well, that would be about 3-4 years later when the NES comes out.
Part of it was Nintendo's formula: control over 3rd parties and keeping it simple but powerful, which helped it to compete against "home computers" in gaming.
But, the NES still ran on Commodore. The main Ricoh CPU is derived from the MOS 6502, also used in the VIC-20, the 1541 disk drive, the Apple II, and even a variant of it was used as part of the Stella chipset in the 2600 VCS.
Watcher3223 4 years ago
Ok. I'm just gonna end this argument. Intellivision was superior to Atari 2600. End of story.
memphiselle 3 years ago 3
Ending an argument that has been dormant and considered over one year ago?
Jeez, man!
Watcher3223 3 years ago
Uh....lol! Yup! Sorry. I didn't know that was a year old argument! Lol! Oh well!! :)
memphiselle 3 years ago 2
I should rephrase.
The Ricoh 6502-based CPUs were used only for the NES. The systems I mentioned used the 6502 by MOS and not a variant by Ricoh while the Atari used what's known as the MOS 6507, which is a 6502 short of a few features.
Watcher3223 4 years ago
NES AND Famicom.
Watcher3223 4 years ago
As for the C64, there is one reality about that computer. Although it was definitely capable of work, we have to fess up to one thing about it: the C64 was famous primarily for gaming.
Watcher3223 4 years ago 2
jeez...like the intellivision game just looks SOOO much better. NOT! They were both 8-bit systems.
smincer 4 years ago
Even little kids who think "the old Nintendo" means Nintendo 64 can tell how much better Intellivision games look compared to Atari 2600 games.
gguru1 4 years ago 3
I'm glad I'm not one of those kids!
ifhgsfj 3 years ago 3
Atari was *NOT* an 8-bit system. Not even close! Atari 2600 could barely handle 4k of ram. 8-bit systems were the original NES and the Sega Master System. As for Intellvision, it's credited as being the first 16-bit system.
Skylinesandsunsets 3 years ago
Like the boy from Atari says, "I didn't know!".
joeshaus 4 years ago
I grew up in st.louis mo i was the only kid on my block who had a intelevison and i had alllllllll the games everbody else had ATARI which was a peace of shit
frankwhite007 4 years ago
Astrosmash is awsome so is Space Battle
robotecha5 4 years ago 2
Intelevision?
I didn't konw!
I didn't know!
LOL
meidc 4 years ago 2
I played AstroSmash for hours upon hours when I was a kid. I absolutely loved my Intellivision!
grumpybb 4 years ago 2
I had Intellivision when I was a kid, I miss it, I got the newer plug and play version but it was'nt the same, it did'nt have the same sounds.
Boojababy 4 years ago
Intellivision football...I still remember the play codes: 9 1 2 3 = screen play. 9 1 2 9 = hail mary.
retseuqzaps 4 years ago
ah man, thank you for that. I gasped when I saw those numbers...I had forgotten. Intellivision rules!
hoobam1 4 years ago
LOL there dissing ATARI, INTELLIVISION RULZ! (I got 1!)
jackmorgs 4 years ago 2
Astrosmash rules. And Armada was way better than Invaders.
VoyBoyX 4 years ago 3
networth astrosmash was the shit yell
BOX5 4 years ago