Added: 4 years ago
From: Jafo232
Views: 242,387
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (535)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MisterScorpius So if i like old cartoons but dislike today's cartoon.. i am too old for them? you don't make much sense.

  • That's Tex Avery for ya lol. He didn't fuck around.

  • Shoot right in the head.

  • some had a sheltered childhood! Tom&Jerry FTW

  • This is "Wild and Wolfy" from 1945.

  • I disagree with the short comment below saying.Out of all the pre-1976 this is by far the most disturbing. Yeah right! Look at an R or NC-17 film get a life! Whoever posted this video?

  • The title is miss leading there is no blood in the cartoon ignore what it says it's all smoke and mirrors that's all it is.

  • Holy cow, someone please tell me the name of this cartoon! I've been trying to find it for years now, but I haven't had any luck!

  • omfg i love these old cartoons better then the shit they show now :D this makes you laugh stuff makes u sleep Dx u watch it cause ur bored to pass time not even enjoyable X.x

  • this is nothing compare to AS cartoons!

  • press 2 after he says "howdy joe" then press 6

  • There's no blood at all.

  • When it comes to headshots and cartoons, nothing beats Daffy Duck getting his beak shot off by Elmer Fudd every thirty seconds or so.

  • BOOM headshot

  • I'm sorry I don't quite think I get it. so one guy got shot in the face...

  • this is BETTER THAN THAT CRAP THEY SHOW ON CARTOON NETWORK

  • wheres the blood?

  • @junior214223 exactly

  • Thumbs up if RAN RAN RU brought you here XD

  • was this uploaded by a six year old?

  • HEADSHOT!!!!!LOL

  • I didn't see any blood o_o

  • Press 6 for instant Headshot.

  • What's this cartoon called?

  • Sure, the cartoon might have been a little more on the violent side of cartoons back then. However, there was NO DAMN BLOOD. Why do people always have to label their videos wrong? It's hard enough to find the video(s) you might want as it is. We don't need to be steered off course even more.

  • @CthulhuForCocoaPuffs So you stumbled upon this video because you were actually looking for kid cartoons with massive amounts of blood in them? I think maybe youtube is not where you should be spending your time, it might be time to check into a shrink.

  • @BioPhreak

    Who said I was looking for kid's cartoons with massive amounts of blood? I didn't. I was just commenting that the video was labeled wrong and how annoying that is for ANY topic.

  • Comment removed

  • Disturbing? If your a kid and actually care

    Bloody? Where's the fucking blood!? It was like the SNES version of MK!

  • @Linkawolf There should be sand blowing out his head because the parent lock is on.

  • ive seen worse

  • who wants to see the rest of the episode now? i know i do

  • thumbs up if... oh wait im not an attention whore

  • Violent?

     No. Bloody? No. Fail? Yes.

  • from droopy dog's 1976 classic over the saloon

  • I think this should be called most "Violent," rather than bloody.

  • what is episode?

  • i came here hoping to make fun of the amount of blood, there is none!

    i want my 17 secconeds back

  • Oh, please, there is no blood. That's just old school slapstick.

  • get a life

  • Yes VERY disturbing!!! lol Consider the fact that less people of the age to watch these cartoons when they were 'Disturbing' have committed less violent crimes than the kids who grew up watching the Smurfs! - 1999 National Crime Statistics study.

    Maybe it was the video games??? lol

  • thumbs up if betty boop brought you here

  • @bigfatman64 First betty boop, then satan worshiping winnie the poo, then here

  • @BlackHeart240 The same, lol

  • @bigfatman64 well i got here from kill billl... dunno how

  • dont worry kids he not dead he just a.............got tired from dodging that bullet

    and he was SO tired by it that he dicided to retire for a while...yea that happened...

  • uh there is no blood

  • Tom & Jerry is more violent than this!

  • Tom & Jerry is more violent than this!

  • you cant see the dogg die

  • hahhahahhahahah XD XD mocos!!! XD

  • BOOM Head Shot!!!

  • @gomezimainia I was about to post that, but then I scrolled down, LOL.

  • blood? where?

  • Strange tags for this video!

  • But still in my own opinion I still think old school cartoons rock while today's cartoons suck and no I'm not a guy in his 50's 0r 60's. I'm in my mid 20's if you're wondering and yes I still think cartoons from the 90's are much better than those being presented in today's times just saying.

  • @PolishExplorer HELLZ YEAH!!!

  • @PolishExplorer Things were better when you were 12 amirite.

    Face it guys you've grown while there are some really bad cartoons out there, there are some really good ones too, to say today's cartoons suck is a sign you're too old for them.

  • Totally agree don't see any blood at all? The title is a total lie if you want something that throws you off on this cartoon it would have to be it's sexual nature with the wolf and the woman in this cartoon as when the wolf whistles to her.

  • its extremely fasinating how the title of this clip was called "Bloodiest Old School Cartoon" yet theres not even a DROP* of blood shown .

  • fucking bollocks.

  • I didn't see blood.

  • congrats on being just another retard making stupid videos

  • There Will Not Be Blood.

  • ummm what?

  • You haven't seen "The Animals of Farthing Wood".

  • Uhhhh.....

    I guess they would have crapped their pants had they ever seen Squidbillies.

  • seen more blood on the teletubbies

  • That was nothing dude! I was expecting way more violent

  • omg never realized how vilent cartoons were back then

  • Love the vid! I remember watching it as a kid. Hate the title and douche that posted this. Only a pussy would think THIS is the "Bloodiest Old School Cartoon".

  • Damn...I think he's dead.

  • He just shot him in the face... He SHOT HIM in the FUCKING FACE!!!

  • Pussies....

    

  • HEADSHOT! MUTI-KILL!

  • calm down leotheloser

  • Uh, most of the MGM library was not released to TV until about 1975. MGM said their stuff was too good for TV. Actually, I believeit was just too violent and sexual prior to that Time.

  • boom headshot

  • Bloodiest? Ha ha ha! If you think this is violence, watch Tom and Jerry.

  • @PinoPinoles Itchy and Scratchy :D lol

  • @anibalybarrarojas

    you don't know wtf your talking about dude (Or even what I was talking about apparently, cause you didn't get what I was saying at all). I've seen cartoons made in the 50's that would make children who grew up on this feel like Mister Roger's personal playmates. You VERY obviously don't know as much about vintage animation as you think... educate yourself ya boner

  • @thebishopdude I agree, most people today don't even know about the Production Code, and how gory and sexual a lot of 'pre-Code' movies are. Today's films may have shock value, however most of that shock value is really cheap, and has no intellectual properties to it, and that's what most of today's audience is subjecting itself to: all show and no substance.

    Amen to old cartoons! And old Noir films! And Buster Keaton! And Claudette Colbert in a milk bath!

  • @KingOfUm wow your gay

  • @msuper651 You're obviously an unintelligent youtube troll who knows absolutely nothing of what I'm talking about but that doesn't stop you from trying to get attention, nice to meet you, and keep it up, you're doing great!

  • HOLY FUCK. Execution style shot to the FUCKING HEAD.

  • Blood. Not there.

  • No fucking blood...

  • uhhhhhhhhhhhhh, wheres the blood

  • joo guys see the tags?

  • Vote this comment up if you don't give a shit who Tommy Joe Ratliff is and think this video is barely anything violent at all.

  • I sure miss the good ol' days of cartoons.

  • omg the tags.

  • Tommy, U and your cartoons, uh? Can U be more adorable? I dare U <333 I f* love you man <3333

  • Who the hell is Tommy Joe Ratliff?

  • @Goldstar127 Tommy is Adam Lambert's bass player. He's a very talented, sweet and gorgeous guy. If U want to know more about him, or see him play, just search for Glam Nation Tour videos. You will find out he has a huge fandom. ;)

  • aww Tommy!!!!

  • O mi god at 00:10 that was so scary

  • yay tommy!!!!!!! i love tommy joe ratliff <3 but i love adam to!

  • violent? hell yes! bloody? nope

  • OMG Tommy sent everyone here. I was the 2nd person here to comment. It was like I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE!

  • TOMMY JOE RATLIFF <3 sent me here

  • OMG!! TOMMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <3

    :D TY TY TY!

  • OMFG! TY TOMMY!!!!! FORGOT ABOUT THIS SHOW!!!! <3 :DDDDD

  • LOL. whoever owns this video is prob so confused "TOMMY!<3"

    tommy <3 seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeexxy ;)

  • tommy sent mee! haha

  • Tommy Sent Me :))))

  • *lol* okay Tommy have a weird humor..But I like this :D

    haha thanks Tommy for posting^^

  • OMFG TOMMY IS A LEGEND!!!! i dont get the bloody bit though lmao

  • YES, Tommy. Just YES. <3333

  • Tommy's funny, hahahaha. And weird, but mostly funny :)

  • Thumbs up if Tommy Joe Ratliff sent you here . :D

  • LOL TOMMY WAT

  • @Morningdew1435 Tommy Joe Ratliff is the bass/keyboard player from Adam Lambert.He had send the link for this video by him on twitter....:D

  • @LoveyouAdamLambert No, I know. I meant "LOL TOMMY WAT" as in, "TOMMY WHY THE HELL ARE YOU WATCHING THIS?" :P

  • that was :(

  • LMAO and this is what tommy watches in his spare time?

  • Vote this comment up if Tommy Joe Ratliff sent you here!

  • @DuelistofRa OMG I was just gonna comment that. I was gonna say Tommy Joe Ratliff just tweeted this

  • @DuelistofRa OMG I was just gonna comment that. I was gonna say Tommy Joe Ratliff just tweeted this. Lol, I LOVE Tommy

  • LOL!!!

  • HEADSHOT!! but wow, the 70's were a violent time, weren't they?

  • @flamedrag18

    There is absolutely no way in hell animation of this quality was made in the 70's. 40's, maybe 50's.

  • I SAW THIS THNKS 4 POSING

  • i loved to watch this

  • thays so fucking hardcore

  • whats so wrong with that? thats how i greet all my friends.

  • The title and description are idiotic. I have to wonder if anyone who finds this so "bloody" and "disturbing" has ever even heard of a truly disturbing cartoon.

  • IN THE FACE!!!!!

  • H-H-H-HEADSHOT

  • i used to watch stuff like this in the 90s. they wouldnt allow it now. they think kids minds are too feabal to see anything apart from rubbish like the cramp twins.

  • where is the blood?????!

  • Ohhh, FACED!!!

  • You people are all opinionated scumbags. The old cartoons are still on TV dipshit(s). If you can't accept the fact that different people have different tastes in humor, I feel sorry for you. If they use(d) drugs, then it's their problem.And who are you people to talk down on the creators of cartoons when most of you probably have never even familiarized yourselves with animation and the like? If you have an understanding of rhetoric and higher thinking orders, you'll know what I mean.

  • these cartoons gave kids born during and before the 90s a sense of humor.

    these days, the cartoons these kids watch are just going to turn them into unindividualistic freaks

  • shot point blank in the face with a high-caliber handgun, way to set an example for kids <.<

  • I actually like those type cartoons... (but maybe I've just been desensitized)

  • thats nothing dude look a little harder. and there is not a drop of blood in this video,, re-title dude.

  • @thebishopdude that's the point. that this si the most violent thing kids watched pre 1980

  • @thebishopdude r u really that stupid, its a joke

  • Lol that's not disturbing, you know what's disturbing??? This crap that we have today is disturbing, and besides, that's how it was back in the old west, this is just a cartoon representing it, and besides, during my Dad's days when he was a kid, all the kids went to go watch Western Movies where there were gunfights and tomahawking, and also the old war films the kids watched those, this is diffinately not disturbing at all compared to now XD

  • This is absolutely disturbing. That blue shirt is terrible.

  • i miss this shit. mindless fucking violence has never beer more useful

  • Hahaha, ok wow! i have to admit, for a cartoon that old, eventhough it didin't have blood it still showed someone getting shot in the face. So i admit that probably shouln't of been in a cartoon. Especially ones as old as those.

  • Disturbing? Where is the blood and gore? Sad that today's cartoons need therapy and there are few that are any 'fun'.

  • But there was no blood...

  • killing spree!

  • Daaaaaaaaang!!!!! LMAO

  • Ahhh the good ole days when animators use their drawing talents and actually drew them by hand. That's why the cartoons were so much better back then. They ban them because of the violence but have you watched the video games these kids are playing nowadays????

  • all i can say is LOL (and further note, BOOM HEADSAWT!)

  • try putting even that in todays cartoons

  • Where's the blood?

  • Not bloody at all, I've seen old Looney Tunes in which the character shoots himself in the head and there's no hint of blood or brain matter anymore than what you get in this toon, unlike what you would get with a real life shot to the head.

  • Why did he shoot him in the head?

  • @panchodaman Because he's evil.

  • I'm only 12 and this is stuff I watched when I was little I hated pretty much everything on TV except Pokemon and Old cartoons

  • what exactly is supposed to be wrong with this?

  • lol it is the bloodyest cuz there no blood in any other cartoons

  • I think it's just that ppl on drugs can identify with them, the director of fear and loathing in las vegas never did any LSD before but he made a very accurate reference to what good LSD can do...not every cartoon nowadays is intentionally related to LSD trips...in fact I see more satiric common sense playing a bigger factor in cartoons these days...in the 30's though Max Fleisher films had wwaaayyy more reference to LSD use than you could imagine...

  • boohoo. im scarred for life.

  • 0:13 i lol'd

  • you're full of shit I've seen worse

  • @Nigel613 are you kidding did you see all that?!

  • @WREQUIEM dude it's a guy getting shot in the face, and some dudes shrinking down to mouse size then it ends....am I missing something??? have you watched Wizards, or Fritz the cat? or even Heavy Metal or Heavy Traffic??? that shit is bloody dude.

  • @Nigel613 this was to much for me :(

  • @WREQUIEM you weren't born under a rock?..... were ya?

  • wow a strait up shot to the face!! man that too balls !!

  • HEADSHOT

  • there was no blood

  • What's the name of this episode?

  • I remember cartoons doing that all the time!!! Thought itbwas funny when i was little

  • cartoon characters don't bleed lol...but i've never seen someone ever get blasted like that on a cartoon b4.

  • @redrambo3

    Daffy got blasted many times! Check it out

  • Tex Avery cartoons are my fav

  • this not bloodiest,where is the blood fucking idiots

  • In Tex's 1955 cartoon "The First Bad Man", narrator Tex Ritter notes that "Texans have always been neighborly...". Then, two Texas cavemen are seen exchanging friendly greetings each other, while taking turns whacking each other with their clubs....

  • ah Tex Avery, the renegade of the golden age of animation

  • Oops I am one of the 111 people who accidentally clicked "like" here.. sorry.

  • It was intense but i saw worse shit on Teenage Muntant Ninja Turtles in the 90's.

  • Sorry about my last comment- when you said old school cartoon I thought you meant an old cartoon for children still in pre school. lol.

  • I think people generally don't understand WHAT these cartoons are supposed to be parodying. They weren't violent for the sake of being violent, but they were making fun of the Western film cliches and conventions. from the 40's to the early 70's, there were tons of Western movies, and TV shows all around depicting the era as a time of ultra violent gunmen and lawlessness. The whole 'walk into a bar and shoot someone at random' was poking fun at the ludicrous casualness of gun fights there.

  • Comment removed