im a michigan fan and i saw that catch and iwas effy but when i saw real close that the ball bounced around ( im talking about this play no other) i knew it wasn't but IDK VT is a good team glad to verse them and what a game to watch.
on youtube. MICHIGAN ROBBED OF GAME TYING TD. Watch it a weep chokie fans. SAME RESULT. Apparently they got it right. Apparently. I'm fine with the ruling either way. But since Meechigan was on that side of the call as well. Not only was your initial ruling TD a joke.
@MeechiganBLue Jesus, don't you read your comments before you post!? You sound re-fucking-tarded.. Go watch you're referenced video, here, watch?v=gQS9nnxKrXU.. Look at 23 seconds, Hemingway proceeds to lose possession of the ball, his hands come off the ball and the ball rolls to his side. He lost possession of the ball, plain and simple. This game shouldn't have even gone to overtime.
@MeechiganBLue The refs clearly fucked VT, 2 illegal motions / false starts on the kicker, and two interceptions overturned by questionable replay officials and a bull shit pass interference call. Michigan didn't even belong on the same field that night, VT was raping mICHIGAN up and down the field all night. You can hold on to this one michigan fans, I hope you feel good about a win that should have a fucking asterisk next to it.
@MeechiganBLue Also, learn how to write in complete sentences. You're like every other jack ass on youtube that unfortunately has a computer and a stupid fucking opinion but doesn't know how to type it in ways that others can understand. Go play in traffic or something.
Pay attention to the Announcers as well. It was a possible Game tying catch with 7 seconds left. One of Michigans 2 losses. Same outcome. Goes both ways VT. Both you losses prior were BLOWOUTS. Type in Michigan Robbed of possible game tying TD. You will recognize the receiver catching the ball....HEMMINGWAY
byersca54, this is not the NFL, in college, the play is over once his elbow hit in bounds with possession of the ball. Touchdown. furthermore there isn't indisputable evidence to overturn the td. Who cares about records and wins? so what! vt might have not won with the td, but it shouldn't have been overturned. It was a spectacular catch!
the ball moves as he hits ground the ball gets pushed up. thats not control chokies. be happy you were in a bowl you didnt deserve that should have been arkansas kansas st. btw this is why your the chokies 1-19 vs top 5, 7-30 vs top 10, 15-32 vs top 15, 7-12 bowl games, 18 - 32 vs non conference 28-38 vs top 20, 41-47 vs ranked and you lost to JMU go dukes
Tyrann Mathieu and Danny Coale = both 2 stars out of highschool who can flat out ball by the way! You can't overturn that call based on indisputable evidence because there is none!
Catch, the refs in this game pissed me off throughout the game. 2 BS pass interference calls. And this!! They did NOT have indisputable video evidence, I hate these refs.
Even if a catch technically isn't "complete" in mid-air... then just as there the ground can't assist in making the catch, if there is possession, the ground can't cause a fumble as well... or am I wrong here?
the fact that the ground jammed the ball into his chest is the very definition of the "ground aiding in the catch" rule people
and to all who are talking about the ball moving as "physics" im sorry but "physics" doesnt apply to this rule...no matter what referee crew you have, if a player catches the ball and the ball hits the ground and moves in his hands or arms...they WILL call it incomplete...period
The process of completing the catch occurs after he comes down with it. The ball can move in his hands when he comes to the ground, but the catch isn't completed until after that. By that time, his elbow, shoulder, and the ball were all out of bounds. Sorry, it's not even close people.
@HumanitarianJ At 49 seconds, he hasn't completed the catch. You don't complete the catch if you come down with the ball and it moves around. If the ball moves around in your hands, the catch isn't completed until afterwards. Pause it at 50 seconds and he's way out.
@TheNapper18 That is not what determines whether or not it is a catch. A catch occurs when the receiver has control of the ball with a firm grasp. The ball is going to hit the ground and move a bit as a matter of physics. Coale had control of the ball, that makes it a catch.
@babblepsych No, a catch is not completed once a receiver has a firm grasp. If the ball is going to come down, move around in his hands, and be complete, he has to actually be in bounds. His elbow, shoulder, and the ball were all out by the time he completed the catch. The catch is not final while he is in mid air.
@GoldIntelligence His elbow did land in bounds as he secured the catch. If you actually read up, the controversy is not whether or not he was in bounds - everyone agrees that he is. The question is whether or not the catch was aided by the ground.
@babblepsych Read up? I don't have to. He was out of bounds before completing the catch. I'm sure it might have been called incomplete even if he were in bounds too. There are multiple ways you could argue it wasn't complete.
@GoldIntelligence WHAT! He had full control then is elbow touched the ground out of bounds are you dumb? You do need to reed up if you think he was out.
catch
TheSwagKingz 1 week ago
im a michigan fan and i saw that catch and iwas effy but when i saw real close that the ball bounced around ( im talking about this play no other) i knew it wasn't but IDK VT is a good team glad to verse them and what a game to watch.
TheRunefan 2 weeks ago
How can they reverse that call! I'm a huge VT fan! That was so a catch. Worst call in football history!
roccorox100 3 weeks ago
on youtube. MICHIGAN ROBBED OF GAME TYING TD. Watch it a weep chokie fans. SAME RESULT. Apparently they got it right. Apparently. I'm fine with the ruling either way. But since Meechigan was on that side of the call as well. Not only was your initial ruling TD a joke.
MeechiganBLue 1 month ago
@MeechiganBLue Jesus, don't you read your comments before you post!? You sound re-fucking-tarded.. Go watch you're referenced video, here, watch?v=gQS9nnxKrXU.. Look at 23 seconds, Hemingway proceeds to lose possession of the ball, his hands come off the ball and the ball rolls to his side. He lost possession of the ball, plain and simple. This game shouldn't have even gone to overtime.
shnicklefritz5 1 month ago
@MeechiganBLue The refs clearly fucked VT, 2 illegal motions / false starts on the kicker, and two interceptions overturned by questionable replay officials and a bull shit pass interference call. Michigan didn't even belong on the same field that night, VT was raping mICHIGAN up and down the field all night. You can hold on to this one michigan fans, I hope you feel good about a win that should have a fucking asterisk next to it.
shnicklefritz5 1 month ago
@MeechiganBLue Also, learn how to write in complete sentences. You're like every other jack ass on youtube that unfortunately has a computer and a stupid fucking opinion but doesn't know how to type it in ways that others can understand. Go play in traffic or something.
shnicklefritz5 1 month ago
Pay attention to the Announcers as well. It was a possible Game tying catch with 7 seconds left. One of Michigans 2 losses. Same outcome. Goes both ways VT. Both you losses prior were BLOWOUTS. Type in Michigan Robbed of possible game tying TD. You will recognize the receiver catching the ball....HEMMINGWAY
MeechiganBLue 1 month ago
Michigan was robbed VS IOWA..
MeechiganBLue 1 month ago
byersca54, this is not the NFL, in college, the play is over once his elbow hit in bounds with possession of the ball. Touchdown. furthermore there isn't indisputable evidence to overturn the td. Who cares about records and wins? so what! vt might have not won with the td, but it shouldn't have been overturned. It was a spectacular catch!
mycahvt 1 month ago
the ball moves as he hits ground the ball gets pushed up. thats not control chokies. be happy you were in a bowl you didnt deserve that should have been arkansas kansas st. btw this is why your the chokies 1-19 vs top 5, 7-30 vs top 10, 15-32 vs top 15, 7-12 bowl games, 18 - 32 vs non conference 28-38 vs top 20, 41-47 vs ranked and you lost to JMU go dukes
byersca54 1 month ago
Ruling shouldn't have been overturned, no question it was a td after looking at 48-49 sec pause. that's what I meant with the last comment
mycahvt 1 month ago
Look at the 49 sec pause, catch, td, no question the ruling should have been overturned!
mycahvt 1 month ago
Tyrann Mathieu and Danny Coale = both 2 stars out of highschool who can flat out ball by the way! You can't overturn that call based on indisputable evidence because there is none!
mycahvt 1 month ago
And everyone who keeps saying he landed out of bounds, watch his left elbow! Hits green with control of the ball! That's a catch!
mycahvt 1 month ago
@mycahvt Thsi is simple. the ball was not in his hands, therefore not under control.
MarkThompson184 1 month ago
Allstate trophy presenter was Michigan alum and shouting Go Blue...just saying something was fishy with the officials
jblev850 1 month ago
Its clearly not a catch. Anyone who tries to come up with reasons as to why it was a catch is reaching. Ball hits the ground and moves. Case closed.
jjpk23 1 month ago
"Completing the process"? Where else is he supposed to put the ball?!
dekkervt 1 month ago
Catch, the refs in this game pissed me off throughout the game. 2 BS pass interference calls. And this!! They did NOT have indisputable video evidence, I hate these refs.
Njnewland1 1 month ago
No catch
sectr988 1 month ago
Even if a catch technically isn't "complete" in mid-air... then just as there the ground can't assist in making the catch, if there is possession, the ground can't cause a fumble as well... or am I wrong here?
CaseyBlase 1 month ago
the fact that the ground jammed the ball into his chest is the very definition of the "ground aiding in the catch" rule people
and to all who are talking about the ball moving as "physics" im sorry but "physics" doesnt apply to this rule...no matter what referee crew you have, if a player catches the ball and the ball hits the ground and moves in his hands or arms...they WILL call it incomplete...period
steelersforlife777 1 month ago
to be honest im a huge michigan fan and this call really couldve gone either way. i wouldve hated to have been the ref to make the call in this game
blitzboy30 1 month ago
The process of completing the catch occurs after he comes down with it. The ball can move in his hands when he comes to the ground, but the catch isn't completed until after that. By that time, his elbow, shoulder, and the ball were all out of bounds. Sorry, it's not even close people.
GoldIntelligence 1 month ago
@GoldIntelligence Um...you need to pause the video at 0.49 and take another hard look.
HumanitarianJ 1 month ago
@HumanitarianJ At 49 seconds, he hasn't completed the catch. You don't complete the catch if you come down with the ball and it moves around. If the ball moves around in your hands, the catch isn't completed until afterwards. Pause it at 50 seconds and he's way out.
GoldIntelligence 1 month ago
Comment removed
skilsihav 1 month ago
sorry- a great catch and effort but the point of the ball hits the ground and moves just a bit.
TheNapper18 1 month ago
@TheNapper18 That is not what determines whether or not it is a catch. A catch occurs when the receiver has control of the ball with a firm grasp. The ball is going to hit the ground and move a bit as a matter of physics. Coale had control of the ball, that makes it a catch.
babblepsych 1 month ago
@babblepsych No, a catch is not completed once a receiver has a firm grasp. If the ball is going to come down, move around in his hands, and be complete, he has to actually be in bounds. His elbow, shoulder, and the ball were all out by the time he completed the catch. The catch is not final while he is in mid air.
GoldIntelligence 1 month ago
Comment removed
babblepsych 1 month ago
@GoldIntelligence His elbow did land in bounds as he secured the catch. If you actually read up, the controversy is not whether or not he was in bounds - everyone agrees that he is. The question is whether or not the catch was aided by the ground.
babblepsych 1 month ago
@babblepsych Read up? I don't have to. He was out of bounds before completing the catch. I'm sure it might have been called incomplete even if he were in bounds too. There are multiple ways you could argue it wasn't complete.
GoldIntelligence 1 month ago
@GoldIntelligence WHAT! He had full control then is elbow touched the ground out of bounds are you dumb? You do need to reed up if you think he was out.
JBzerK 1 month ago
0:47 clearly a catch those refs are blind zebras
SuperUKNUMBER1 1 month ago
that was a catch those refs are blind zebras
0:47 is clearly a catch
SuperUKNUMBER1 1 month ago
That isn't a catch. sorry
Gamer71TPF 1 month ago
wow! how can you overturn that.
katparkerphotography 1 month ago
Looks like a catch to me
gc4hokies 1 month ago
VT got screwed this was a catch no doubt about it
basketballer9023 1 month ago
Absoultely no way that is indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the field. Screw job by the Big10/PAC12 alliance officials
johnnyd10vt 1 month ago 7
@johnnyd10vt AGREED! the reof that game was pac12 yet his husband was in big12.
nascardenny11 3 weeks ago
@nascardenny11 *ref
nascardenny11 3 weeks ago
GT fan here...there is no way that call should have been overturned. Vt got robbed!
vamp927 1 month ago