Let me explain to you how this works: you see, the corporations finance Team America, and then Team America goes out... and the corporations sit there in their... in their corporation buildings, and... and, and see, they're all corporation-y... and they make money.
I must say that I am extremely disappointed by some of the negative comments posted here. Do you mortals not realise that CELEBRITIES KNOW EVERY THING!
You know what? You cant have it both ways. Unless you are prepared to sacrifice the quality of your lifestyle, we will need more energy. The alternatives for risk free energy will come but unfortunately not in our lifetime. The last time I checked, Southern California has an insatiable appetite for indulging themselves. Do we really need more than 2 vehicles, 5000 square ft homes with all the luxuries?
Wow... You think LNG is dirty? You poor poor fools. Liard didn't even know why he didn't want the facility. LNG is the cleanest burning hydrocarbon! Extremely enviromentally friendly and exonomically transported since we move it by ship in liquid state. The safe track records of LNG tankers and terminals along with a very small window of air to fuel ratio make it very good! A whole facility can NOT BLOW UP. A 5-15% ratio for combustion, you can't explode a facility with such a small window
It's sad when people open their mouths before they know what they are talking about. Lets go back to 9th grade chemistry. When burning a hydrocarbon, the exothermic reaction will produce CO2 and H2O (in case you lost me, CO2 is what you breath out, and the other is water!). Other emmissions come from impurities in the fuel, or incomplete combustion. Methane (90+% of LNG) is the cleaning burning substance know to mankind. Look is up. And if you say CO2 is bad, do us all a favor and stop breathing
Right...CO2 is what we breath out..and guess why we breath it OUT instead of IN? Maybe because is toxic for the human body? Sure, CO2 is processe by plants to give us oxigen, but an excessive presence of CO2 in the atmosphere is like breathing from an exausting pipe. Why don't you try it with your car and see if is good for your lungs... Than "maybe" i will shut up. I do not care if the toxic comes from the gas or from impurities..the product of the burnts is still toxic dude!
You should look up the term "toxic". We breathe in CO2 all the time and it doesn't hurt us. Too much of it merely displaces O2 as it is heavier than air. We only use 4% of the 21% O2 we take in of every breathe. CO2 flows in our bloodstream where capillaries transfer it to our lungs via the aveoli for us to exhale. It is not toxic however (although CO is). So many of your type like complain with no solutions. Do you think your computer runs on hopes and dreams? Electricity comes from somewhere.
Of course it have to come from somewhere.... but why does it have to be something which pollutes^? Or something which will enable or even strenghten the "same old powers"? to have control on it? Why are we still arguing about fossile fuels and nobody talks about renewable sources of energie?
LNG is perfectly safe. These celebrities need to do their homework before they jump on some bandwagon just to get publicity. LNG vessels are the safest and cleanest ships on the ocean. Never has one drop on LNG been spilled let alone ignited. Some LNG ships could discharge their cargo miles off shore and not require a large shore facility. If Hale Berry and Laird Hamilton had read anything about LNG before doing this protest they would realize how dumb they made themselves look.
those californians don't have a darn clue what the hack they are saying...they never heard of LNG..only very big V8 big blocks and Hummers...ignorants and ignorants and just proves how americans really are. We have news for u...we don't need you...anywere!!!!
So sad when the uneducated try to think, isn't it flouride? Poor mitch here doesn't realize he fart natural gas every day, and that methane unburnt is more of a greenhouse gas than the CO2 it would emmit if it was cleanly burned. I do despise a battle of wits with an unarmed person, it's just not fair!
You've got to love the ignorance shown by the people of California. They try to tell everyone else how to live their lives, and can't even fund themselves. I agree with musiccmt1 on his comment - cut them off and see what happens.
California is digging a hole. I wish negboring states, and the feds would stop supplying them. Cut off all power, stop sending them gas, stop bailing them out, and make them produce their own. I think they would change their views.
I live in NJ and there are currently 3 projects being proposed. Most of the pro LNG comments here stress LNG's cleanliness and safety.That seems to be less an issue than the sea floor damage, the cost to protect ships(they are terror targets) and the fact that it is a foreign source of oil.While I consider celebs simply citizens (energy brainiacs or not), clearly those who work in LNG have motives that are of self interest. They aren't trying to get or keep a job. LNG workers sort of are, no?
I've worked on LNG tankers since 1987. They are the safest, cleanest ships in the world. These California flakes know nothing about LNG. They want cheap clean energy but not the infrastructure that makes it possible.
Lng ignites at about 1,000 degrees i believe ,also...it's amazing that you have Engineers like JBLanchard who give you the facts on LNG but idiots like bfalcy who just jump on a bandwagon to be with the In Crowd...Ted Danson doesn't know ANYTHING bout natural gas but what he is told...typical hollywood American style hysteria foisted into the media spotlight while the rest of the world laughs at you
I haul 10,000 gallons of LNG every day , delivering it to all the major trash and bus companies in California and Arizona....from Anaheim to Phoenix they all burn clean ,natural ,safe fuel...have you ever heard of an LNG tanker exploding? Rupturing? No, because it doesnt happen ,but diesel and gas tankers roll and rupture all the time.
All these comments seem to come from people who know nothing about the LNG tankers and ports. Since these people helped protest, your LNG line is now proposed to rape and plunder Oregon. I wish some movie stars would come north and help us protest. All you commenters.....do you know how much pressure 1440psi are? do you know what a frac out is? have you seen the houses that were burned to the ground just this past September by these exact pipelines? Go stick your head back in the sand
man you're really dumb. I'm a cryogenic technician and I bathe in the stuff ,even at -260. What do you want for your houe, to heat it in the winter, propane? An unstabble gas? You're the dummy here ,no one else. Go buy an island dummy and wear grass leaves in the winter....oh wait you're a JOBLESS LOSER who doesn't know his head from his ass, sorry!
I totaly agree with you nicolette1971. I work for a LNG company in scandinavia, and those celebrities just demonstrates their ignorance and lack of knowledge!
Yeah, just get a bunch of high profile folks who know nothing about LNG to speak out about it; that'll work.
"just a bomb", they know NOTHING! Do some research about the stuff before you reject it. LNG is the cleanest, safest alternative to oil available at the monent.
I am a fan of many of these stars, BUT LNG is about as clean as it gets? Many folks rely on natural gas to heat their homes... Natural gas powers the electric plants that supply energy to Hollywood so they can make movies. Would they be willing to give up their private jets (they burn JP-5)? LNG (unlike coal and crude oil) how can they say a clean-burning fuel (LNG) contributes to global warming? Do the people in this video CARPOOL? I think NOT.
I am a marine engineer. I work on LNG ships. LNG is not very volatile. LNG is all around better for the environment when compared to any other crude product. It is cheaper. I believe there should be standardized testing for protesters before they are allowed to protest. People need to research what they are fighting against. There are a plethora of publications on the subject. It seems no one in this video knows how to debate. Don't shoot your mouth off if you don't know anything.
Amen buddy. Fancy to see another LNG Marine Engineer on here speaking up about these complete IDIOTS. Damn NIMBY's, and Ted Danson sounds like that Ms SOuth Carolina chick.... just shooting off words they know because they have NO IDEA what they are talking about!
Come over later for a beer and we'll make fun of these granola shake drinking fools later. Heck, the most problems I've had onboard from any nationality was a Californian that would argue any issue jus tlike these idiots.
Ted Danson is an idiot. The only business that the Malibu coast brings in is $20M homes built in the middle of wildfire and landslide zones. California taxpayers have to pay millions for firefighters to protect their McMansions.
These actors want to protect Malibu and their $10M homes, but wouldn't give a crap if they wanted to put it near a working class or poor neighborhood.
These celebrities would also throw a protest against oil companies if crude prices rose to $180 per barrel.
These celebs dont know shit,lol,they just on the band wagon like everyone else..They arent concerned about the enviroment,they are concerned that everytime they look out theyre beachside house they gonna see an LNG ternimal within theyre view..
Actors are morons, thats why they act like the know everything. LNG has been around since the 60's. If you turn away LNG, we increase our dependence on oil based fuels, which are more polluting. Natural gas is clean and 1/3 the cost of oil. So you retarded celebrities, if you dont want LNG, then dont fkn complain about your electricity and heating bills. cant have it both ways there danson. so wrong
The offshore terminals are the best thing going... just got one off Gloucester here in the east. However, if they're going to insist on protesting, they should HAVE A CLUE about what they're babbling about.
A bunch of rich-ass celebrities need our help!?.......The middle class couldn't even afford to get sand between their toes in Malibu. Fuck Malibu and the 'cause'.........
It is a pity that people take such a negative stance towards LNG when it is the cleanest economical fuel source available in the world today. I think we all want to save the planet and keep it as green as possible but we still need the lights on in our homes. One of the LNG receiving terminals should be built on the West coast and it should happen soon.
These people are idiots! It's an AD for this Surf Shack. "like its a bomb man...like totally, we'll all get blown up, man!"
jaysto7017 1 year ago
aint too crowded out there, that looks really pleasureable
droctagon3k 1 year ago
Let me explain to you how this works: you see, the corporations finance Team America, and then Team America goes out... and the corporations sit there in their... in their corporation buildings, and... and, and see, they're all corporation-y... and they make money.
capitalsho 2 years ago
I must say that I am extremely disappointed by some of the negative comments posted here. Do you mortals not realise that CELEBRITIES KNOW EVERY THING!
capitalsho 2 years ago
You know what? You cant have it both ways. Unless you are prepared to sacrifice the quality of your lifestyle, we will need more energy. The alternatives for risk free energy will come but unfortunately not in our lifetime. The last time I checked, Southern California has an insatiable appetite for indulging themselves. Do we really need more than 2 vehicles, 5000 square ft homes with all the luxuries?
BigJoeHuron 2 years ago
Wow... You think LNG is dirty? You poor poor fools. Liard didn't even know why he didn't want the facility. LNG is the cleanest burning hydrocarbon! Extremely enviromentally friendly and exonomically transported since we move it by ship in liquid state. The safe track records of LNG tankers and terminals along with a very small window of air to fuel ratio make it very good! A whole facility can NOT BLOW UP. A 5-15% ratio for combustion, you can't explode a facility with such a small window
DZLDamon 2 years ago
DZL...."LNG is the cleanest burning hydrocarbon!"
Don't you realize that the product of the burnt of a hydrocarbon CAN'T be classified as "clean"?
DukeMitch 2 years ago
It's sad when people open their mouths before they know what they are talking about. Lets go back to 9th grade chemistry. When burning a hydrocarbon, the exothermic reaction will produce CO2 and H2O (in case you lost me, CO2 is what you breath out, and the other is water!). Other emmissions come from impurities in the fuel, or incomplete combustion. Methane (90+% of LNG) is the cleaning burning substance know to mankind. Look is up. And if you say CO2 is bad, do us all a favor and stop breathing
DZLDamon 2 years ago
Right...CO2 is what we breath out..and guess why we breath it OUT instead of IN? Maybe because is toxic for the human body? Sure, CO2 is processe by plants to give us oxigen, but an excessive presence of CO2 in the atmosphere is like breathing from an exausting pipe. Why don't you try it with your car and see if is good for your lungs... Than "maybe" i will shut up. I do not care if the toxic comes from the gas or from impurities..the product of the burnts is still toxic dude!
DukeMitch 2 years ago
You should look up the term "toxic". We breathe in CO2 all the time and it doesn't hurt us. Too much of it merely displaces O2 as it is heavier than air. We only use 4% of the 21% O2 we take in of every breathe. CO2 flows in our bloodstream where capillaries transfer it to our lungs via the aveoli for us to exhale. It is not toxic however (although CO is). So many of your type like complain with no solutions. Do you think your computer runs on hopes and dreams? Electricity comes from somewhere.
DZLDamon 2 years ago
Of course it have to come from somewhere.... but why does it have to be something which pollutes^? Or something which will enable or even strenghten the "same old powers"? to have control on it? Why are we still arguing about fossile fuels and nobody talks about renewable sources of energie?
DukeMitch 2 years ago
LNG is perfectly safe. These celebrities need to do their homework before they jump on some bandwagon just to get publicity. LNG vessels are the safest and cleanest ships on the ocean. Never has one drop on LNG been spilled let alone ignited. Some LNG ships could discharge their cargo miles off shore and not require a large shore facility. If Hale Berry and Laird Hamilton had read anything about LNG before doing this protest they would realize how dumb they made themselves look.
scubashuler 2 years ago
i dont giva shit about what malibu does.
the corporations sponsor your acting. maybe you should stop advertising them in your movies when you drive a 4x4 to make millions.
harshvgaus 2 years ago
LNG is clean and safe!!
VillageVet14 2 years ago
Лоооооооооохи:)))))))))))))
BocharovAnton 2 years ago
hmmmmmm. halle berry is rather plain looking wo makeup.
fluoridemakesudumb 2 years ago
those californians don't have a darn clue what the hack they are saying...they never heard of LNG..only very big V8 big blocks and Hummers...ignorants and ignorants and just proves how americans really are. We have news for u...we don't need you...anywere!!!!
pingoMan1498 3 years ago
true.....LNG is the cleanest burning fuel but california also has the most environmentally conscious people. celebs are dumb.
:)
fluoridemakesudumb 2 years ago
fluoridem...
"LNG is the cleanest burning fuel".. I doesn't matter if is the cleanest of all the burning fuels...as it burns FUEL....IT CAN'T BE CLEAN!!!
DukeMitch 2 years ago
So sad when the uneducated try to think, isn't it flouride? Poor mitch here doesn't realize he fart natural gas every day, and that methane unburnt is more of a greenhouse gas than the CO2 it would emmit if it was cleanly burned. I do despise a battle of wits with an unarmed person, it's just not fair!
DZLDamon 2 years ago
You've got to love the ignorance shown by the people of California. They try to tell everyone else how to live their lives, and can't even fund themselves. I agree with musiccmt1 on his comment - cut them off and see what happens.
otubry 3 years ago
please.......not all of us are retarded celebrities. california is a the technological hub of america.
silicon valley ring a bell?
fluoridemakesudumb 2 years ago
California is digging a hole. I wish negboring states, and the feds would stop supplying them. Cut off all power, stop sending them gas, stop bailing them out, and make them produce their own. I think they would change their views.
musiccmt1 3 years ago
I live in NJ and there are currently 3 projects being proposed. Most of the pro LNG comments here stress LNG's cleanliness and safety.That seems to be less an issue than the sea floor damage, the cost to protect ships(they are terror targets) and the fact that it is a foreign source of oil.While I consider celebs simply citizens (energy brainiacs or not), clearly those who work in LNG have motives that are of self interest. They aren't trying to get or keep a job. LNG workers sort of are, no?
gabrielleobre 3 years ago
I've worked on LNG tankers since 1987. They are the safest, cleanest ships in the world. These California flakes know nothing about LNG. They want cheap clean energy but not the infrastructure that makes it possible.
FSPhillyO 3 years ago 3
Lng ignites at about 1,000 degrees i believe ,also...it's amazing that you have Engineers like JBLanchard who give you the facts on LNG but idiots like bfalcy who just jump on a bandwagon to be with the In Crowd...Ted Danson doesn't know ANYTHING bout natural gas but what he is told...typical hollywood American style hysteria foisted into the media spotlight while the rest of the world laughs at you
nicolette1971 3 years ago
I haul 10,000 gallons of LNG every day , delivering it to all the major trash and bus companies in California and Arizona....from Anaheim to Phoenix they all burn clean ,natural ,safe fuel...have you ever heard of an LNG tanker exploding? Rupturing? No, because it doesnt happen ,but diesel and gas tankers roll and rupture all the time.
nicolette1971 3 years ago 2
All these comments seem to come from people who know nothing about the LNG tankers and ports. Since these people helped protest, your LNG line is now proposed to rape and plunder Oregon. I wish some movie stars would come north and help us protest. All you commenters.....do you know how much pressure 1440psi are? do you know what a frac out is? have you seen the houses that were burned to the ground just this past September by these exact pipelines? Go stick your head back in the sand
bfalcy 3 years ago
man you're really dumb. I'm a cryogenic technician and I bathe in the stuff ,even at -260. What do you want for your houe, to heat it in the winter, propane? An unstabble gas? You're the dummy here ,no one else. Go buy an island dummy and wear grass leaves in the winter....oh wait you're a JOBLESS LOSER who doesn't know his head from his ass, sorry!
nicolette1971 3 years ago
I totaly agree with you nicolette1971. I work for a LNG company in scandinavia, and those celebrities just demonstrates their ignorance and lack of knowledge!
xx1000xx 3 years ago
Yeah, just get a bunch of high profile folks who know nothing about LNG to speak out about it; that'll work.
"just a bomb", they know NOTHING! Do some research about the stuff before you reject it. LNG is the cleanest, safest alternative to oil available at the monent.
garypaulsmith 3 years ago
Some facts:
There are 295,000 miles of gas Transmission pipelines in the US; and over 1,900,000 miles of Natural Gas Distribution pipelines.
There are 109 LNG "peak shaving" gas staorage plants in the US right now, many have been operating since the 1970's without incident.
LNG peak shaving plants are connected to our natural gas transmission and distribution systems.
In LNGs 45 year shipping history, LNG ships have traveled more than 100 million miles without a single major incident.
lesatseaside 3 years ago 4
I am a fan of many of these stars, BUT LNG is about as clean as it gets? Many folks rely on natural gas to heat their homes... Natural gas powers the electric plants that supply energy to Hollywood so they can make movies. Would they be willing to give up their private jets (they burn JP-5)? LNG (unlike coal and crude oil) how can they say a clean-burning fuel (LNG) contributes to global warming? Do the people in this video CARPOOL? I think NOT.
tuutuutango 3 years ago 2
I am a marine engineer. I work on LNG ships. LNG is not very volatile. LNG is all around better for the environment when compared to any other crude product. It is cheaper. I believe there should be standardized testing for protesters before they are allowed to protest. People need to research what they are fighting against. There are a plethora of publications on the subject. It seems no one in this video knows how to debate. Don't shoot your mouth off if you don't know anything.
jblanchard85 3 years ago 4
Amen buddy. Fancy to see another LNG Marine Engineer on here speaking up about these complete IDIOTS. Damn NIMBY's, and Ted Danson sounds like that Ms SOuth Carolina chick.... just shooting off words they know because they have NO IDEA what they are talking about!
Come over later for a beer and we'll make fun of these granola shake drinking fools later. Heck, the most problems I've had onboard from any nationality was a Californian that would argue any issue jus tlike these idiots.
DZLDamon 2 years ago
Ted Danson is an idiot. The only business that the Malibu coast brings in is $20M homes built in the middle of wildfire and landslide zones. California taxpayers have to pay millions for firefighters to protect their McMansions.
These actors want to protect Malibu and their $10M homes, but wouldn't give a crap if they wanted to put it near a working class or poor neighborhood.
These celebrities would also throw a protest against oil companies if crude prices rose to $180 per barrel.
nightfrog65 3 years ago 3
These celebs dont know shit,lol,they just on the band wagon like everyone else..They arent concerned about the enviroment,they are concerned that everytime they look out theyre beachside house they gonna see an LNG ternimal within theyre view..
topper2142 3 years ago
I want to fucking shoot them all!
marco6981 3 years ago
Actors are morons, thats why they act like the know everything. LNG has been around since the 60's. If you turn away LNG, we increase our dependence on oil based fuels, which are more polluting. Natural gas is clean and 1/3 the cost of oil. So you retarded celebrities, if you dont want LNG, then dont fkn complain about your electricity and heating bills. cant have it both ways there danson. so wrong
eqcelerate 4 years ago 2
AMEN!!! What retards. NOT having LNG is going to pollute more than having it, Tony Danson! Get a clue.
BYU4U 3 years ago
The offshore terminals are the best thing going... just got one off Gloucester here in the east. However, if they're going to insist on protesting, they should HAVE A CLUE about what they're babbling about.
greydark, that singer sucks.
djtaylor9061 4 years ago
Who is the singer on the music track, he is good.
greydark 4 years ago
His name is Israel Kamakawiwo Ole -"Iz"
This is a medley from "Somewhere over the rainbow" and "Wonderful world"
But maybe you know it already ;)
krockersdigest 4 years ago
A bunch of rich-ass celebrities need our help!?.......The middle class couldn't even afford to get sand between their toes in Malibu. Fuck Malibu and the 'cause'.........
Mowac 4 years ago
Are celebrities always right? I mean, outside of Entertainment Tonight. Do these people ever have to engage their brains?
houseguy 4 years ago
It is a pity that people take such a negative stance towards LNG when it is the cleanest economical fuel source available in the world today. I think we all want to save the planet and keep it as green as possible but we still need the lights on in our homes. One of the LNG receiving terminals should be built on the West coast and it should happen soon.
pethorsen 4 years ago 2
So were they successful in stopping LNG??
juxtaposdbologna 5 years ago
The final hearing is April 4th
Balou7562 5 years ago
The Hearing is April 9,2007 at 5:00pm
OXNARD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER -800 HOBSON WAY, OXNARD 93030
Be there.
RinconJim 4 years ago
Do you know what the final judgement was on it?
vedder12 3 years ago