ok so i know this one guy who is an NIV person! he sais the missing verses in the kjv were never in the original aramaic, and greek scriptures. and that the niv is taken directly from the original scriptures. is this true?
The NIV has Melchizedek 8 times in the book of Hebrews, and a total of 10 times if you include the Psalms and Genesis. And Mediator is used 7 times in the NIV as well. I used the NIV 1984, and not the new ones. However, you did say you were reading the NIV for fifteen years, so I wonder if this is the same edition you used for this video? Thoughts please.
I find what you said about the use of Jehovah's name, odd.
Every time LORD or GOD is spelled in ALL caps in the KJV, it's a stand-in for that great name. Rabbis had a concept of making up laws to put a hedge of protection around God's laws. They would never take his name in vain, if they never said it, or so they thought. Anyway, it's in there way more than 7 times.
God be blessed; this helps us relate to the New Testament writers who said /Kurios/ for 'Lord' for Jehovah.
@montivistaman I hope that there's a heaven, And if there is, we'll all be there, That probably there's not, doesn't make me despair, If there was a good God, there would be no hell, If there was a loving God all would turn out well, But probably God's are imaginary! A failed hypothesis! How am I going to experience anything, When I've turned back into dust? see Job 14v10-14, Eccles 3v19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both. All have the same spirit / breath.
I am wondering though... I have two 1611 KJV Bibles (one is Hendrickson Publishers and the other is Oxford University Press) and they don't capitalize the W in 'Word' in verses 1 john 1:1 and revelation 19:13... This seems odd, it seems like these words should be spelled with a capital W. Is there something strange about the 1611 bibles that I have?
@neverreload There isn't a spelling error of "Melchizedek" versus "Melchisedec". The Old Testament is Hebrew translated to English, the New Testament is Greek translated to English. Observe other words like OT "Noah" vs. NT "Noe", and OT "Isaiah" vs. NT "Esaias". None of these are "spelling errors". They are proper translations!
Thank you though for bringing this subject up. I don't think I ever explained this in any of my videos.
So they are all a different terms used to name or describe Jesus. I dont believe you can disprove the worth of the NIV by these few things. Jesus is The Word. Jesus is the Mediator. But if I said Jesus is the order of Melchizedek? doesnt seem right. And Its kinda like saying why doesnt Jesus have 7 letters in his name? or 7 syllables or Jesus be used 7 times only. Btw KJV has spelling errors, gotta look at the New King James version. I'd like more explanation I guess.
Great work. Keep it up. There are several mis-transliterations between the two. I like the preamble written for king james by the team of who put it together. you should be able to google it. It exposes and demonized the pope-ish times they were living in and set free the multitude to read it for themsleves forever.
I agree with you almost 100%. The Jehova issue is not a valid leg to stand on so to speak. "Jehova" is an invented word most likely brought about by Tindale pre-KJV. Before that it was never used and never even heard of. Who gives anyone authority to make up a word and label God with it? It is just another example of pagan practices being applied to Christianity.
not saying hes wrong, not saying none of yawl isnt right. but just saying that there is no reason to really be argueing about this. i dont believe it is something really to be yelling at eachother about. enspecially when it deals with God we all suspose to operate in love and debates like this makes peopel draw away from eachother..
me in my oppion i say if that bible has brought people to God just as well as the kjv has then the devil wouldnt use it.... why use something that attacks himself
Let us know when we are not on the right path. I'm sure if I was to take the hymn "amazing grace" and apply some type of numbers formula I could come up with 666. The Bible needs to be retranslated from the originally texts plus the addition of new texts that have been discovered since 1611. I'm a student of history and I don't think you can say without a shadow of doubt that the Anglican Church that has a steep history riddled with corruption did a solid on the KJV.
The translators of the KJV agents of the Anglican Church preface the KJV as it is not the inspired version. There are numerous misinterpretations in the KJV. There are references to mythical creatures. There is a reference to corn with is a native American product that was discovered in the 16th century. Your methods are flawed. The Bible should be used as a bridge between us and our Savior. The Holy Spirit will convict and
How anyone professing to be a Christian and concerned a bout the word of God could believe the NIV is a great bible is beyond me. Of course, if you endorse Westcott and Hort and their mentors, Origen, Eusebius, Jerome, etc., then I guess it's the book for you.
Numerous words, verses -entire verses are either deleted, altered or taken away in a footnote such as "the best mss read such and such". Referring, of course, to the corrupt Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.
hey, I use the kjv, nasb, niv in English and Spanish and I have learned the same doctrine has you with all 3 version of the bible. I don't see any problem with the niv or any of the new version. there is nothing wrong with the kjv ether. the with the only bible I have a problem with is with the published the the Watchtower.
Jack Hyles, Kent Hovind, Chuck Missler, Bill Schnoebelen to name just a few, all endorse the King James. why? Because the KJV (Textus Receptus) is the only Bible that has real Power over the Enemy, the rest are new-age lukewarm powerless bibles. When Bill Schnoebelen was in the Occult the only bible they hated was the KJV they ignored the rest. Now as a Christian, he strongly endorses it of coarse praise Yeshua.
Luke 5:20-25 proves Jesus is God, even in the NWT. 2Tim 3:16,17 If God can't stop the devil from tweeking his word then the devil wins. we would be cut off.
@michaelgtln Your ignorance of scripture is typical.
1. Jesus said "If a man LOVE ME he will keep my WORDS". (John 14:23a)
2. Jesus condemned the Pharisees because they held their TRADITIONS above SCRIPTURE! (Mark 7:13)
3. God's written word is MAGNIFIED above His name! (Psalm 138:2)
You attack me because you cannot handle what I presented in this video. I should be "reaching lost people", and yet YOU took the time to comment on my video! Are YOU reaching the lost by attacking me?
@husky394xp , i'm not attacking you. I'm making an attempt to have a coversation with you. Don't you think this video could have been titled, Jesus loves you, or He died for you. This video makes Athiests look at usike we are freaks. I am in love with my Savior Jesus Christ. Also, why the all caps on hypocrit?
NIV isn't the only version that excludes those words you mentioned. Is this a KJV vs just the NIV teaching? or KJV vs all the other bible translations that don't include those certain words according to the references you stated? Is this teaching only against NIV? Is this teaching only to single out NIV because you have come to believe that it is a Satanic influenced version, and that all the other versions are ok (though many also exclude those words your mentioned.)? Thanks for answering.
intresting i do hav a k jv but lately ive been reading the niv.sum of these guys commenting on here r speaking in ignorance they should do sum research b4they flap there jaw. thanx4mor info husky
@montivistaman The word "ass" in the KJV means donkey. The word "bastard" means a child born out of fornication. And "pisseth" is the Bible word for urinate. It is dishonest to say that the KJV contains profanity because our modern culture has perverted the meanings of words found in the Bible. Don't lie about the word of God!
The funny thing is, that most people who attack the KJV for the above mentioned words, have no problem watching tv or movies which are filled with REAL profanity!
More useless junk masquerading as Christian intelligence. This is nothing more than a rehash of Gail Riplinger's insane logic. If this kind of garbage doesn't drive you to know and love Jesus and to make sure your doctrine is correct nothing will. " O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science FALSELY SO CALLED ". 1 Timothy 6:20.
First I will say that it's not a library, it is my office. And the reason for the sword is because I was getting ready to shoot another video where I use the sword to illustrate a point I was trying to make.
God uses numbers all the time. Remember when Joesph was in slavery for 7 years and then 7 years there was wealth then 7 years of famine. God gave 777 right there!!! There is a reason why certain events have pecific years mentioned.
I'm a Christian but its suspicious all this KJV stuff because 777 are the the divine numbers from the"Book of Law"by Aliester Crowley.You can see that the movie"Book of Eli"its just an anagram of "Book of Lie"refering to the KJV in the movie, so Book of Eli/Lie/Law its refering to Aliester Crowley's book & if you see the roots of Gail Riplinger(KJV defender),i mean she studied on the illuminati oxford university,so i think KJV is like thelema Crowley's teachings disguised with a Christian cover
@NEBisYrfrend I wasn't "brought up" on the KJV. I was raised in a new version church, and I personally used the NIV for 15 years. It was only after a lot of research that I started using and believing the King James Bible.
The NIV is satanic for more reasons than what I presented in this video. The Greek manuscripts on which the NIV is based, don't even come from the same part of the world as those which the KJV comes from. Please do some more research into this issue. Watch my other videos.
The KJV is true and the NIV is false. That is fact. It can't be argued.
I spent 3 years reading and thinking the NIV was just like any other Bible. IT IS NOT. The NIV is damnable. It can cost you your soul. Please do not go to hell!
Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
Interesting, I find it also interesting that the NIV changes the word lucifer and implies that satan and Jesus are the same especially in context with the point you are making n this video.
Oooh. Maybe you should get with Gail Riplinger and write a book about this. Numbers, numbers, numbers! This is insane. There is no secret code in the Bible. There is no conspiracy with the new translations. You are comparing Translations!!! Why not stick to doctrine and leave the conspiracy numerology to the loons.
@MrSuperchicken1 Actually I do know Gail Riplinger. She sells my dvd's. You would do well to study her material. But I imagine her books contain a little too much truth to for your narrow mind.
@husky394xp So you have no problems being friends with a liar who also happens to be a loon? w w w. avpublications. o r g
There are no rules for numerology, so you can make things say what you want them to say. Im sure the Apostle Paul had no idea nor inclinations about some hidden code in his writings! But he wrote in Greek, so I guess your secret code is in the English only. Wise up sir.
@MrSuperchicken1 I present plain documented FACTS and you can't handle them. The NIV was produced by lost people with the help of the Roman Catholic church. The NIV is a satanic counterfeit, which I have proved in my years of research.
If you don't understand the bible's own system of numbers (7, 6, 13, etc.) than you truly are foolish! You are a Pharisee who's purpose is to bring other people down to your level of stupidity. If you persist in your slander, you will be removed!
@husky394xp I wonder how you define the gospel of Jesus Christ? Would you answer that, or point me to one of your videos that address this... Thank you.
@hier0phant Hi brother Joseph. I have been thinking and praying about what to do concerning the Alexandrian Pharisees like "TheHeroOfChrist". (There's no pride of course in calling yourself the HERO of Christ! WOW, what an egomaniac!)
2 Timothy 2:14 comes to mind; "Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers."
I don't have time to answer the never-ending questions!
1 tim 3:17 pertains to what the scriptures are used for - instruction in righteousness being one of them. If you don't have perfect instructions, then how can we live righteously before God?
husky394xp - I agree with your assessment that the NIV insidiously undermines Jesus Christ's divinity. Nevertheless, the King James Bible possesses unforgivable drawbacks and shortcomings, being an antiquated 400-year-old Anglican translation which utilizes Elizabethan prose and is completely disconnected from contemporary English-speaking laypeople, incorporating multitudinous Medieval-period archaisms, interpolations, mistranslations, translational inconsistencies, and unjustifiable omissions.
husky394xp - If you're referring to the Protestant canon of 66 books which have collectively undergone multiple revisions and scribal corrections, there are dozens of English versions available at your local bookstore.
@TheHeroOfChrist So God's perfect written word is "dozens of English versions" which all contradict each other? Why don't you just be honest and admit that you hate the idea of a perfect book which judges YOU.
You follow the Roman Catholic tradition that man can become a god on his own, and the sciptures are only there to quote to the "laity" which haven't attained to your level. I have been through this game before.
husky394xp said: "So, God's prefect written word is 'dozens of English versions'"
By perfect, I assume you mean 'authentically original', 'untarnished', and 'unchangeable'. The Protestant bible contains 66 books. None of their autographs (original copies) exist. Every manuscript copy in existence contradicts one another. No two copies are exact replications. Apparently, the scribes and copyists had no intention of 'perfectly preserving' the writings which were eventually canonized and codified.
@TheHeroOfChrist Look at Psalm 1; 42; 73; 90; and 107. Each of those is the first chapter of one of the books of Psalms. Psalms is 5 books, and not just 1, thus increasing the number of books in the Bible from 66 to 70. 7x10=70. Ten is the number of the Ten Commandments. I'm saying 10 is the number of good works. So, the 70 Books of (Protestant-type) Scripture are God's complete, good work.
@stars431 You might want to check out Dr. Doug Stauffer's video on the NKJV here on YouTube. It is called "The New King James PerVersion". Very good video!
hey bro, what is the third one, order of melchesidek? what does that mean? thanks for the great vids man keep em comin, passing out your latest DVD thought it was great !
ok so i know this one guy who is an NIV person! he sais the missing verses in the kjv were never in the original aramaic, and greek scriptures. and that the niv is taken directly from the original scriptures. is this true?
knowledgebringslight 1 week ago
The NIV has Melchizedek 8 times in the book of Hebrews, and a total of 10 times if you include the Psalms and Genesis. And Mediator is used 7 times in the NIV as well. I used the NIV 1984, and not the new ones. However, you did say you were reading the NIV for fifteen years, so I wonder if this is the same edition you used for this video? Thoughts please.
marsxpander 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I use The JHV Bible
MoldytoasterMedia 2 months ago
I find what you said about the use of Jehovah's name, odd.
Every time LORD or GOD is spelled in ALL caps in the KJV, it's a stand-in for that great name. Rabbis had a concept of making up laws to put a hedge of protection around God's laws. They would never take his name in vain, if they never said it, or so they thought. Anyway, it's in there way more than 7 times.
God be blessed; this helps us relate to the New Testament writers who said /Kurios/ for 'Lord' for Jehovah.
RoaringTRex 2 months ago
@montivistaman I hope that there's a heaven, And if there is, we'll all be there, That probably there's not, doesn't make me despair, If there was a good God, there would be no hell, If there was a loving God all would turn out well, But probably God's are imaginary! A failed hypothesis! How am I going to experience anything, When I've turned back into dust? see Job 14v10-14, Eccles 3v19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both. All have the same spirit / breath.
zytigon 3 months ago
Great video. Thank you for sharing.
I am wondering though... I have two 1611 KJV Bibles (one is Hendrickson Publishers and the other is Oxford University Press) and they don't capitalize the W in 'Word' in verses 1 john 1:1 and revelation 19:13... This seems odd, it seems like these words should be spelled with a capital W. Is there something strange about the 1611 bibles that I have?
across186 3 months ago
Thats really interesting.
rachellily232 3 months ago
Comment removed
rachellily232 3 months ago
Very interesting. Really provacative stuff.
Outa curiosity, are you jewish?
AntiHero2411 3 months ago
Psalm 110:4 KJV
The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 5:6 KJV
As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
why spelling error? also in the new version Jehovah is taken out
neverreload 4 months ago
@neverreload There isn't a spelling error of "Melchizedek" versus "Melchisedec". The Old Testament is Hebrew translated to English, the New Testament is Greek translated to English. Observe other words like OT "Noah" vs. NT "Noe", and OT "Isaiah" vs. NT "Esaias". None of these are "spelling errors". They are proper translations!
Thank you though for bringing this subject up. I don't think I ever explained this in any of my videos.
husky394xp 4 months ago
So they are all a different terms used to name or describe Jesus. I dont believe you can disprove the worth of the NIV by these few things. Jesus is The Word. Jesus is the Mediator. But if I said Jesus is the order of Melchizedek? doesnt seem right. And Its kinda like saying why doesnt Jesus have 7 letters in his name? or 7 syllables or Jesus be used 7 times only. Btw KJV has spelling errors, gotta look at the New King James version. I'd like more explanation I guess.
neverreload 4 months ago
Comment removed
neverreload 4 months ago
At 3:45, you said that something was valid, if it was agreed upon by the early Church Fathers. Weren't all the Church Father's Catholic?
LVCIVSTVLLIVSATELLVS 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2Ti 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
2Ti 3:17 so that the man of God may be perfected, being fully furnished for every good work.
does the NWT exclude John Ch1 (v.1-51) which is John's testimony of the divinity of Christ? 51 verses of Jesus's divinity.
BTW the NWT is much more accurate than KJV because we have found more manuscripts since 1600.
suggesttwo 5 months ago
Hi: Very Very Good!!!!
God Bless!!
Pastor David Skakun
cmccaable 5 months ago
Great work. Keep it up. There are several mis-transliterations between the two. I like the preamble written for king james by the team of who put it together. you should be able to google it. It exposes and demonized the pope-ish times they were living in and set free the multitude to read it for themsleves forever.
thelordourgodisone 5 months ago
I agree with you almost 100%. The Jehova issue is not a valid leg to stand on so to speak. "Jehova" is an invented word most likely brought about by Tindale pre-KJV. Before that it was never used and never even heard of. Who gives anyone authority to make up a word and label God with it? It is just another example of pagan practices being applied to Christianity.
bsfree4u2 6 months ago
NIV is OK, as is the KJV. Bibles to avoid are "paraphrases" and junk like "The Message" and "Word On the Street". NLT also sucks.
WayOfTheMaster454 6 months ago
rubbish its a number of a man not bible . not that the NIV is good
njh007 6 months ago
not saying hes wrong, not saying none of yawl isnt right. but just saying that there is no reason to really be argueing about this. i dont believe it is something really to be yelling at eachother about. enspecially when it deals with God we all suspose to operate in love and debates like this makes peopel draw away from eachother..
me in my oppion i say if that bible has brought people to God just as well as the kjv has then the devil wouldnt use it.... why use something that attacks himself
JRainN1379 6 months ago
Let us know when we are not on the right path. I'm sure if I was to take the hymn "amazing grace" and apply some type of numbers formula I could come up with 666. The Bible needs to be retranslated from the originally texts plus the addition of new texts that have been discovered since 1611. I'm a student of history and I don't think you can say without a shadow of doubt that the Anglican Church that has a steep history riddled with corruption did a solid on the KJV.
brmcneely 7 months ago
The translators of the KJV agents of the Anglican Church preface the KJV as it is not the inspired version. There are numerous misinterpretations in the KJV. There are references to mythical creatures. There is a reference to corn with is a native American product that was discovered in the 16th century. Your methods are flawed. The Bible should be used as a bridge between us and our Savior. The Holy Spirit will convict and
brmcneely 7 months ago
How anyone professing to be a Christian and concerned a bout the word of God could believe the NIV is a great bible is beyond me. Of course, if you endorse Westcott and Hort and their mentors, Origen, Eusebius, Jerome, etc., then I guess it's the book for you.
Numerous words, verses -entire verses are either deleted, altered or taken away in a footnote such as "the best mss read such and such". Referring, of course, to the corrupt Sinaiticus and Vaticanus.
ColColt45 7 months ago
hey, I use the kjv, nasb, niv in English and Spanish and I have learned the same doctrine has you with all 3 version of the bible. I don't see any problem with the niv or any of the new version. there is nothing wrong with the kjv ether. the with the only bible I have a problem with is with the published the the Watchtower.
0323Christian 7 months ago
Jack Hyles, Kent Hovind, Chuck Missler, Bill Schnoebelen to name just a few, all endorse the King James. why? Because the KJV (Textus Receptus) is the only Bible that has real Power over the Enemy, the rest are new-age lukewarm powerless bibles. When Bill Schnoebelen was in the Occult the only bible they hated was the KJV they ignored the rest. Now as a Christian, he strongly endorses it of coarse praise Yeshua.
gallactorme 7 months ago
all cristeanaty was made so big opareshns can makke muny sorry hahaha goole terans mcena
LAMBOFGOD690 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Luke 5:20-25 proves Jesus is God, even in the NWT. 2Tim 3:16,17 If God can't stop the devil from tweeking his word then the devil wins. we would be cut off.
suggesttwo 7 months ago
@michaelgtln Your ignorance of scripture is typical.
1. Jesus said "If a man LOVE ME he will keep my WORDS". (John 14:23a)
2. Jesus condemned the Pharisees because they held their TRADITIONS above SCRIPTURE! (Mark 7:13)
3. God's written word is MAGNIFIED above His name! (Psalm 138:2)
You attack me because you cannot handle what I presented in this video. I should be "reaching lost people", and yet YOU took the time to comment on my video! Are YOU reaching the lost by attacking me?
HYPOCRITE!
husky394xp 8 months ago
@husky394xp , i'm not attacking you. I'm making an attempt to have a coversation with you. Don't you think this video could have been titled, Jesus loves you, or He died for you. This video makes Athiests look at usike we are freaks. I am in love with my Savior Jesus Christ. Also, why the all caps on hypocrit?
michaelgtln 8 months ago
NIV isn't the only version that excludes those words you mentioned. Is this a KJV vs just the NIV teaching? or KJV vs all the other bible translations that don't include those certain words according to the references you stated? Is this teaching only against NIV? Is this teaching only to single out NIV because you have come to believe that it is a Satanic influenced version, and that all the other versions are ok (though many also exclude those words your mentioned.)? Thanks for answering.
liquidviperx 9 months ago
Thank you for this information-it is worth taking seriously for sure.
victoriabenn 9 months ago
intresting i do hav a k jv but lately ive been reading the niv.sum of these guys commenting on here r speaking in ignorance they should do sum research b4they flap there jaw. thanx4mor info husky
jwdimick74 10 months ago
I love how people make a difference about grammar when we're translating languages that don't directly translate.
rock1the1arts100 10 months ago
@montivistaman "Whore" is NOT profanity. Give me a break!
Hebrew - "mamzer" Definition - "a mongrel...- bastard"
Hebrew - "chamor" Definition - "a male ass"
Hebrew - "shathan" Definition - "to make water, i.e. urinate: - piss"
All of these are from Strong's Concordance. (Which I don't even recommend!)
Not in the Hebrew? You don't know what you are talking about!
Why can't you deal with the information I present in my video?
I am not going to keep answering your foolish accusations!
husky394xp 10 months ago 8
@montivistaman The word "ass" in the KJV means donkey. The word "bastard" means a child born out of fornication. And "pisseth" is the Bible word for urinate. It is dishonest to say that the KJV contains profanity because our modern culture has perverted the meanings of words found in the Bible. Don't lie about the word of God!
The funny thing is, that most people who attack the KJV for the above mentioned words, have no problem watching tv or movies which are filled with REAL profanity!
husky394xp 10 months ago 18
@husky394xp nice!!!!!! PRAISE AHAYAH!!!
fonz1231 5 months ago
Dear brother, where are the 7 passages where they took out the name "Jehova"?
diewahrheitistnochda 10 months ago
NIV=non inspired version
ChildofYeshua777 1 year ago
@ChildofYeshua777 thats a good one! :)
diewahrheitistnochda 10 months ago
More useless junk masquerading as Christian intelligence. This is nothing more than a rehash of Gail Riplinger's insane logic. If this kind of garbage doesn't drive you to know and love Jesus and to make sure your doctrine is correct nothing will. " O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science FALSELY SO CALLED ". 1 Timothy 6:20.
spockelf 1 year ago
Good job Brethren
acerv36 1 year ago
why is there a sword right next to you, in a library?
joe124joe 1 year ago
@joe124joe Good question! :)
First I will say that it's not a library, it is my office. And the reason for the sword is because I was getting ready to shoot another video where I use the sword to illustrate a point I was trying to make.
husky394xp 1 year ago
@joe124joe he is in the knights templar
seckixf 5 months ago
IM BURNING My NIV tommorow, will post video
seckixf 5 months ago
@joe124joe maybe legend of zelda practice later?
flyboi2345 1 month ago
Thank you for this video.
soulwinningministry 1 year ago
AMEN Brother. This is gold this video. Yeah!
sthnwatch 1 year ago
God uses numbers all the time. Remember when Joesph was in slavery for 7 years and then 7 years there was wealth then 7 years of famine. God gave 777 right there!!! There is a reason why certain events have pecific years mentioned.
SawaneeKimbirli 1 year ago
@SawaneeKimbirli watch Al Neal!! and study his biblestudies. but be aware, he is pro-branham.
diewahrheitistnochda 10 months ago
777 views
bbbckcal 1 year ago
Awesome! Very interesting and once again shows how God's perfect word is PERFECT!
seminolestringband 1 year ago
I'm a Christian but its suspicious all this KJV stuff because 777 are the the divine numbers from the"Book of Law"by Aliester Crowley.You can see that the movie"Book of Eli"its just an anagram of "Book of Lie"refering to the KJV in the movie, so Book of Eli/Lie/Law its refering to Aliester Crowley's book & if you see the roots of Gail Riplinger(KJV defender),i mean she studied on the illuminati oxford university,so i think KJV is like thelema Crowley's teachings disguised with a Christian cover
WatchThisVideos 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check this out:
watch?v=zRzWRvHmH4Y
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
Comment removed
NEBisYrfrend 1 year ago
@NEBisYrfrend I wasn't "brought up" on the KJV. I was raised in a new version church, and I personally used the NIV for 15 years. It was only after a lot of research that I started using and believing the King James Bible.
The NIV is satanic for more reasons than what I presented in this video. The Greek manuscripts on which the NIV is based, don't even come from the same part of the world as those which the KJV comes from. Please do some more research into this issue. Watch my other videos.
husky394xp 1 year ago
Comment removed
NEBisYrfrend 1 year ago
Play it safe folks. Stick to the version we have used for 4 hundred years, the KJV!!!! These modern versions have way too many problems.
mbhotie715 1 year ago
...answer not a fool according to his folly
DennyBones 1 year ago
@DennyBones Ok, I won't.
husky394xp 1 year ago
I would make a comment but the Bible tells me not to answer a fool according to his folly.
DennyBones 1 year ago
The KJV is true and the NIV is false. That is fact. It can't be argued.
I spent 3 years reading and thinking the NIV was just like any other Bible. IT IS NOT. The NIV is damnable. It can cost you your soul. Please do not go to hell!
Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.
DearGodForgiveMe 1 year ago
Interesting, I find it also interesting that the NIV changes the word lucifer and implies that satan and Jesus are the same especially in context with the point you are making n this video.
krisv001 1 year ago
Oooh. Maybe you should get with Gail Riplinger and write a book about this. Numbers, numbers, numbers! This is insane. There is no secret code in the Bible. There is no conspiracy with the new translations. You are comparing Translations!!! Why not stick to doctrine and leave the conspiracy numerology to the loons.
MrSuperchicken1 1 year ago
@MrSuperchicken1 Actually I do know Gail Riplinger. She sells my dvd's. You would do well to study her material. But I imagine her books contain a little too much truth to for your narrow mind.
husky394xp 1 year ago
@husky394xp So you have no problems being friends with a liar who also happens to be a loon? w w w. avpublications. o r g
There are no rules for numerology, so you can make things say what you want them to say. Im sure the Apostle Paul had no idea nor inclinations about some hidden code in his writings! But he wrote in Greek, so I guess your secret code is in the English only. Wise up sir.
MrSuperchicken1 1 year ago
@MrSuperchicken1 I present plain documented FACTS and you can't handle them. The NIV was produced by lost people with the help of the Roman Catholic church. The NIV is a satanic counterfeit, which I have proved in my years of research.
If you don't understand the bible's own system of numbers (7, 6, 13, etc.) than you truly are foolish! You are a Pharisee who's purpose is to bring other people down to your level of stupidity. If you persist in your slander, you will be removed!
husky394xp 1 year ago
@husky394xp I wonder how you define the gospel of Jesus Christ? Would you answer that, or point me to one of your videos that address this... Thank you.
MrSuperchicken1 1 year ago
@husky394xp This statement alone destroys any credibility you may have had.
rb300dx 1 year ago
Thank you brother for this video. This is very important information. Keep defending the word/Word of God; it is the will of God.
2 Timothy 2:2
And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.
-Joseph
hier0phant 1 year ago
@hier0phant Hi brother Joseph. I have been thinking and praying about what to do concerning the Alexandrian Pharisees like "TheHeroOfChrist". (There's no pride of course in calling yourself the HERO of Christ! WOW, what an egomaniac!)
2 Timothy 2:14 comes to mind; "Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers."
I don't have time to answer the never-ending questions!
husky394xp 1 year ago
@TheHeroOfChrist
I'm sorry 1 John 5:13.
1 tim 3:17 pertains to what the scriptures are used for - instruction in righteousness being one of them. If you don't have perfect instructions, then how can we live righteously before God?
1 John 5:17
All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
hier0phant 1 year ago
husky394xp - I agree with your assessment that the NIV insidiously undermines Jesus Christ's divinity. Nevertheless, the King James Bible possesses unforgivable drawbacks and shortcomings, being an antiquated 400-year-old Anglican translation which utilizes Elizabethan prose and is completely disconnected from contemporary English-speaking laypeople, incorporating multitudinous Medieval-period archaisms, interpolations, mistranslations, translational inconsistencies, and unjustifiable omissions.
TheHeroOfChrist 1 year ago
@TheHeroOfChrist So what is God's perfect written word? Where can I get a copy?
husky394xp 1 year ago
husky394xp - If you're referring to the Protestant canon of 66 books which have collectively undergone multiple revisions and scribal corrections, there are dozens of English versions available at your local bookstore.
TheHeroOfChrist 1 year ago
@TheHeroOfChrist So God's perfect written word is "dozens of English versions" which all contradict each other? Why don't you just be honest and admit that you hate the idea of a perfect book which judges YOU.
You follow the Roman Catholic tradition that man can become a god on his own, and the sciptures are only there to quote to the "laity" which haven't attained to your level. I have been through this game before.
husky394xp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
husky394xp said: "So, God's prefect written word is 'dozens of English versions'"
By perfect, I assume you mean 'authentically original', 'untarnished', and 'unchangeable'. The Protestant bible contains 66 books. None of their autographs (original copies) exist. Every manuscript copy in existence contradicts one another. No two copies are exact replications. Apparently, the scribes and copyists had no intention of 'perfectly preserving' the writings which were eventually canonized and codified.
TheHeroOfChrist 1 year ago
@TheHeroOfChrist Look at Psalm 1; 42; 73; 90; and 107. Each of those is the first chapter of one of the books of Psalms. Psalms is 5 books, and not just 1, thus increasing the number of books in the Bible from 66 to 70. 7x10=70. Ten is the number of the Ten Commandments. I'm saying 10 is the number of good works. So, the 70 Books of (Protestant-type) Scripture are God's complete, good work.
RoaringTRex 2 months ago
what about the NKJV bible?
stars431 1 year ago
@stars431 In this instance the NKJV follows the KJV readings, and is not as bad as the NIV. But the NKJV still has a lot of other problems.
husky394xp 1 year ago
@husky394xp I like John MacArhur alot and his preaching and I use his MacArthur study bible that's why I ask.
stars431 1 year ago
@stars431 You might want to check out Dr. Doug Stauffer's video on the NKJV here on YouTube. It is called "The New King James PerVersion". Very good video!
husky394xp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@husky394xp ok,I'll check it out, thanks.
stars431 1 year ago
Astounding! Thanks for the research.
shann0rla 1 year ago
hey bro, what is the third one, order of melchesidek? what does that mean? thanks for the great vids man keep em comin, passing out your latest DVD thought it was great !
parisreidhead 1 year ago
serious research!
MessiahSaves 1 year ago
Thank you Jesus for saving a wretch like me.
warriorspikes51 1 year ago
Amen Brother.The NIV is a satanic counterfit
bloodyswordisa63 1 year ago
"I'm going to kneel before Him and not some dirty sinner down here on this earth"
Amen! that gave me a good chuckle, brother :)
talkingfortruth 1 year ago