Governor Jerry Brown, Chief Justice Ronald M. George

[InverseCondemnation1]

The United States Supreme Court will have to decide California (Cal. Rules of Court, rul 8.500(b)(1).) and (Cal.Rules of Court, rule8.1105.) in order to decide if California Government can actually use storm water drainage systems for other use then storm water!

The second Appellate Court in their California case law decision talk about this use and the videos presented to them showing the department of Transportation use of this drainage system!

[InverseCondemnation1]

The Second Appellate Court does not find an (Abuse of Discretion) in their July 28, 2010 published decision P. 6 and 7 or, that it is a Prejudicial Error for the County of San Luis Obispo-or Union Pacific Railroad to withhold 150 Oceano/County whiteness-plus photo/Questionnaires/ documents from discovery until after trial July 30, 2008!

[InverseCondemnation1]

Bookout challenges the trial court's findings by listing what it characterizes as changed conditions since the Exchange constructed the junction box in the 1970's. The alleged changed conditions include: maintenance activities, modifications to Well No. 8, weed abatement, removal of a retaining wall, alteration of Highway 1, shoveling and grading of debris, accumulation of debris, and an increase in impervious surfaces."

As stated by the Second Appellate Court.

[InverseCondemnation1]

Bookout v. State of California needs to be reheard with Judge Martin J. Tangeman withholding evidence that went with exhibit #579 How is Government allowed to dredge debris into a communities storm water drainage channel, while Caltrans is allowed to shovel debris into a storm water drainage channel?