The cluster gives me the impression a crease can form between masses under certain conditions, looking at it in the 2-dimensional terms of the elastic sheet model. A circular tunnel-like lensing effect would come from rotating the 2D crease around the visual axis to make it 3D. IDK, maybe a crease could arise from some sort of quantum gravitational entanglement, something like closed graviton cycles, with the local cluster, which maybe has a particularly-close history with the cluster shown.
As I understand it, dark matter effects are seen in two different ways - by the lensing effects seen here and by galactic spin profiles as measured using photo comparisons. The spin effect is apparently considered a cold dark matter type of effect, while the lensing effects are apparently considered more like a warm dark matter type of effect, which I suppose conforms better with the roundness of the lensing arcs. Dark spin and dark lensing would seem to be better descriptions, being GR-neutral.
Seems the long flat doubly-lensed galaxy image in the lower left corner (~8 o'clock angle) at 0:45 illustrates a bipolar nature in quantum gravity, in that the line of the image appears to double-back over itself at both ends, light spreads into overlap from the central zero-radius positive gravity maxima and also from a pair of surrounding nonzero radius secondary gravity maxima forming the ends of the image.
At 0:46 there are two pairs of concentric lensing lines, one pair at the 2 o'clock position and another pair at the 6 o'clock position. Both pairs are equally spaced. I think this could be best explainable using a wave correction to steady-state gravity replacing G with Gcos[(2pi)(r)(Fpp(g))/(diam(p))(Fpp(e))] where
diam(p)=proton diameter=~10^-15 meters; Fpp(e)/Fpp(g)=ratio of electric force to gravity between two close protons=~10^36. The modification also allows matter-antimatter layering.
I wish I could prove it. I've recently been thinking of going back to the first university I attended, doing nothing definite about it yet. I dropped out from there around 1978, but it was engineering then, not simulations or quantum physics. Then, I see a new news article about gravity lensing quoting someone from that university, and I get a miscellaneous letter from that university, though I haven't gotten one from them in decades. Guess that seals it, just a matter of time.
This reminds me of the chaotic light patterns one sees when peering inside a stack of mirrored spheres. Could be totally wrong here, but I get the impression these galaxies are underestimatedly dense matter cores surrounded by antimatter. Assuming antimatter has negative mass, it seems the effect of the antimatter envelope could be somewhat refractive or opalescent to the extent that the lensing in that part is apparently the opposite of conventional gravity lensing.
I tried squinting at the last frame, to see if it would help. FWIW, the "purple" (which looks blue on my monitor, but then again I like to tune down the red quite a bit) looks vaguely like an odd pair of spheres. At the center of the larger sphere is a triangular formation. For whatever reason, the two extremely bright starlike objects fit right in with a comparison I could make, but I'm going to decline to make it because it could elicit extreme drama from some authoritarian-type.
I've misunderstood this presumably-young galaxy cluster before, the blue computer-generated region is supposed to represent dark matter but nonetheless it is really not at all precise, IMO. Looks like the lensing model must be half-right at best and the mass distribution is probably substantially off, and all that is basically due to the gravity model being wrong. Sorry if this offends anyone but that's how it lays out.
The cluster gives me the impression a crease can form between masses under certain conditions, looking at it in the 2-dimensional terms of the elastic sheet model. A circular tunnel-like lensing effect would come from rotating the 2D crease around the visual axis to make it 3D. IDK, maybe a crease could arise from some sort of quantum gravitational entanglement, something like closed graviton cycles, with the local cluster, which maybe has a particularly-close history with the cluster shown.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
As I understand it, dark matter effects are seen in two different ways - by the lensing effects seen here and by galactic spin profiles as measured using photo comparisons. The spin effect is apparently considered a cold dark matter type of effect, while the lensing effects are apparently considered more like a warm dark matter type of effect, which I suppose conforms better with the roundness of the lensing arcs. Dark spin and dark lensing would seem to be better descriptions, being GR-neutral.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
Seems the long flat doubly-lensed galaxy image in the lower left corner (~8 o'clock angle) at 0:45 illustrates a bipolar nature in quantum gravity, in that the line of the image appears to double-back over itself at both ends, light spreads into overlap from the central zero-radius positive gravity maxima and also from a pair of surrounding nonzero radius secondary gravity maxima forming the ends of the image.
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
Comment removed
CACBCCCU 3 months ago
What's the size of this cluster?
drtony999 1 year ago
At 0:46 there are two pairs of concentric lensing lines, one pair at the 2 o'clock position and another pair at the 6 o'clock position. Both pairs are equally spaced. I think this could be best explainable using a wave correction to steady-state gravity replacing G with Gcos[(2pi)(r)(Fpp(g))/(diam(p))(Fpp(e))] where
diam(p)=proton diameter=~10^-15 meters; Fpp(e)/Fpp(g)=ratio of electric force to gravity between two close protons=~10^36. The modification also allows matter-antimatter layering.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
@CACBCCCU ... Your smart!!!
Rockster1997 1 year ago
@Rockster1997
I wish I could prove it. I've recently been thinking of going back to the first university I attended, doing nothing definite about it yet. I dropped out from there around 1978, but it was engineering then, not simulations or quantum physics. Then, I see a new news article about gravity lensing quoting someone from that university, and I get a miscellaneous letter from that university, though I haven't gotten one from them in decades. Guess that seals it, just a matter of time.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
This reminds me of the chaotic light patterns one sees when peering inside a stack of mirrored spheres. Could be totally wrong here, but I get the impression these galaxies are underestimatedly dense matter cores surrounded by antimatter. Assuming antimatter has negative mass, it seems the effect of the antimatter envelope could be somewhat refractive or opalescent to the extent that the lensing in that part is apparently the opposite of conventional gravity lensing.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
It screams young triplets of galaxies. Thanks.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
I tried squinting at the last frame, to see if it would help. FWIW, the "purple" (which looks blue on my monitor, but then again I like to tune down the red quite a bit) looks vaguely like an odd pair of spheres. At the center of the larger sphere is a triangular formation. For whatever reason, the two extremely bright starlike objects fit right in with a comparison I could make, but I'm going to decline to make it because it could elicit extreme drama from some authoritarian-type.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
I've misunderstood this presumably-young galaxy cluster before, the blue computer-generated region is supposed to represent dark matter but nonetheless it is really not at all precise, IMO. Looks like the lensing model must be half-right at best and the mass distribution is probably substantially off, and all that is basically due to the gravity model being wrong. Sorry if this offends anyone but that's how it lays out.
CACBCCCU 1 year ago
Some narration would have been appreciated.
RobertSeattle 1 year ago