if i ever go to switzerland im going to hit the slopes, drink some hot chocolate, and collide some particles; i wonder if travelocity offers something like this
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
"we've got PhD honours graduates", etc, etc... yeah, but i'd rather have had a big, brand new, fully specced, fully staffed excellent hospital for every EU nation. because that's what this farce has cost EU taxpayers.
@9hello123 so you think the LHC project makes more/better equipment and human resources available for medical care across europe. that's not only ill considered; it reveals misguided assumptions about the cost/benefit of big science. people in medicine or healthcare would laugh at you. please evaluate your thoughts before presenting them as statements of fact. i did a lot of evidence gathering on the true total cost of the LHC and it's all in the public domain.
@rothkoaintdead If it wasn't for particle accelerators you wouldn't have PET scanners, you wouldn't have the internet, you would have superconductors, you wouldn't have half of the things there is in a hospital. The LHC is brand new and ofcourse it obviously hasn't made discoveries that have made it into application yet, do you honestly think that governments would allow a technology into hospitals after only a couple of months of testing?
@rothkoaintdead But saying that the LHC has already helped to develope super conductors for ITER. And good for you "doing a lot of evidence gathering" I know without a shadow of a doubt that unless you have a PhD in particle physics you do not know more about this than me.
@9hello123 i'm only claiming to have carefully read and verified facts in the public domain. i also do not claim a superior knowledge. however, in our dialogue, i am making better reasoned and more intelligent comments than you. for this reason alone, my statements are more credible than yours.
@9hello123 my initial comment was on socially responsible finance. public medicine, with its high costs and rewards is a good comparator: an unhealthy european workforce would be less able to work hard and multiply the wealth of the elites. this would make europe less competitive in world trade, less economically stable, and more politically vulnerable. we don't need an eventual trickle-down benefit to the public; we need capacity for people to work, spend, and enjoy upward mobility.
@9hello123 im sure Cern is being used to develop weapons for the government. If you dont think so then look at the manhattan project none of them knew the research they were conducting was for weaponization until it was too late.
Lol, what do you think they thought they were doing making a device that's only purpose is to completely destroy a large area? Do you think that building a nuclear bomb is easy or something? It's incredibly complicated and they need to know what they are doing. They can't just be told "Yeah go piss about with these elements until something happens"
@9hello123 Umm I guess you seem to not know how those black projects are run. There many individual projects all classified as one. So yes most scienticists don't know what the goal is for. Let me give you an example theres a 100 mile fusion reactor I think in france. Yes fusion energy can be used for free energy but more than likely it will be the power source for some weapon that is being worked on somewhere else. There's always two sides. I know lots of examples.
@9hello123 hmm are you aware of the 300 letter cap where a person can only summarize what would prolly be a page in like 10 or 12 lines. No you wouldn't be aware of it. Because your vocabulary for insulting only stretches but so far. Second don't make stupid comebacks like the creator of metal. Let me give you an example for your simple brain to understand. Nuclear power aka the splitting of atoms can be used for more than bombs. Matter of fact they power majority of homes.
@selftaughtninja The Manhattan project wasn't developing nuclear power. It was developing nuclear bombs. Saying the discoverer of nuclear theory is the same as developing a nuclear bomb is exactly the same as saying the discoverer of metal is the same as developing a nuclear bomb. The Manhattan project was entirely designed to make a nuclear bomb. "Because your vocabulary for insulting" I'm fairly sure I haven't insulted you ,yet you've insulted me and every physicist.
@9hello123 Ok your not understanding what I'm saying. I apologize for being insulting. All I'm saying is they lied to those scientists. I know thats what the government does. Because my uncle is a scientists and he tells me they mislead scientists. Some may know the real goal. But not most. Most scientists get lied to so that they build tech.A hadron collider is just a particle accelerator. If used for destruction would be really really bad. Especially a big one connected to a fusion reactor.
@selftaughtninja They didn't lie to the Manhattan project. They all knew what they were doing, they all were at the tests for the nuclear bombs and all continued working on it after them. All scientists know what they are researching for three reasons 1) Nearly all scientists work on their own research and they tell the government what they are researching, not the other way around. 2) Physics isn't just something you can start researching without any goal.
@selftaughtninja 3) No one knows what research will find out, that's why its research. You can't just research how to make a better weapon.I know what the Hadron Collider is thanks(and it's just not a particle accelerator its a very specific type of particle accelerator).Connected to a fusion reactor?Well for one the hadron collider isn't connected to a fusion reactor. For two it couldn't be because the fusion reactor would just melt and stop being a fusion reactor and just become molten metal.
@selftaughtninja France relies heavily on FISSION reactions to sustain their energy needs but, as of yet, fusion reaction is not sustainable. The university of Cambridge in England is the leader in the development of the technology. So far they have only achieved a 40 second reaction. The problem seems to lie in the containment of the high energy plasma. But, I digress. The promise of Fusion energy would be a godsend. and as far as I'm aware of, the joining of atoms is not a threat .
Buddy, I'm not sure where you get your "facts" but even students at MIT knew what they were working on. It's part of their cultrure now and one of the song that upper classmen teach the mewbies harolds their particapation in the manhattan development.
@aravenidiot i made that comment a long time ago. And honestly dont care anymore. I doubt anyone knows what the Manhattan project was intentionally meant for but the government. And the military factions that they worked with. We can go back and forth or knowledge that we think we may know but in the end we're both running around in the dark pissing on each other with inadequate information claiming the other person is false indirectly.
Hola. Yo necesito tu correo electrónico para yo enviarle a usted una nueva idea acerca de una posible nueva ecuación para la energía cinética relativista. Gracias por tu atención. Atentamente: José Gregorio Guevara Pérez desde la ciudad de Valencia, pais Venezuela. Mi correo electrónico es JGGP36@Yahoo.com.
English language, translated from the Spanish language by Babel Fish.
Hello. I need your electronic mail I to send to you a new idea about a possible new equation for the relativistic kinetic energy. Thanks for your attention. Kindly: Jose Gregorio Guevara Perez from the city of Valencia, Venezuela country. My electronic mail is JGGP36@Yahoo.com.
someone explain me, if in a particle accelerator if a particle is accelerated to near light velocity then as per this einstein's equation mass will reach near infinity as energy is conserved, then how is the accelerator stable and able to withstand such high mass gain
all this "God" shit is fucking stupid. if you guys think there is a a man or a woman that has unworldly powers and he decides who lives and who dies then you are fucking retarded. i think the big bang makes more sense of how the universe was created than some fucking man sitting in the sky, controlling everything. all you bible pushers go fuck yourself, because there is no god.
CERN is not only the largest scientific research laboratory in the world, CERN was also created to do research on weapons that will be used in the near future ...
if I'm wrong but someone will have heard about the plasma rifle ....
@9hello123 use your brain. I'm not saying tomorrow will come on the market the plasma rifles .... because it is impossible .. I'm saying that they are neighbors in the sense that 10 years from now there may be the first directed energy weapons ... and know that this project and for many years that goes on ..... thanks to CERN now that mankind will make great strides in technology ...
@91Skulboy You're saying CERN is involved in weapons research, which it clearly doesn't. Yes, CERN will make great strides in technology however not towards plasma rifles. And plasma isn't "directed energy".
@9hello123 What makes you think that a huge potential as CERN is not being used for military purposes? I am confused I have said before that the plasma rifle and directed energy ... the plasma rifle shoots bullets of energy composed of electrically charged matter composed of electrons, neutrons and protons. All this happens through a process of air ionization.
@ytmoog If it wasn't for the LHC PET scanners (which have saved countless lives) would never of been invented. Neither would a lot of current methods of cancer treatment, the internet would be a lot slower and more than likely to slow for it to ever of become commercial.
what if this right here is the answer to every movie ever made.
In 2012, we successfully create a universe and destroy the one we live in. And it's all just part of the architect's plan to create a perfect universe.
How could the "Big Bang" be created out of nothing if there was nothing in the universe at the time even the universe didn't exist nothing was there so what created the big bang? NOTHING. God created the universe not some myth of the "Big Bang". For something to be created you need a creator (God) and the creator has to be eternal so that means nothing created God he was always there and always will be.
People never learn untill they go to far and can't undo it.
@adzii1 God would be just as much reductio ad infinitum as the universe. According to your logic, I could postulate that God was created by a pink fluffy unicorn and think that'd somehow be a valid answer.
@adzii1 alright i agree with all of wat u just said just one thing the big bang was how good created this world so yes there was nothing before that god created this bag bang therfore the universe, are knowledge will be based on wat did god create for the big bang and how
I'm just saying ... the religious orders say "Prove to me he does not exist" and scientist say” Prove to me he does exist.” Why not come together with this experiment and see what happens? Each wants an answer....
In the Opinion section of New Scientist/ Feb. 2010 - there was an article that Cern was on trial for wanting to recreate the Big bang. Many faith believers opposed it. WORRIED scientist would create the black hole eliminating us as a whole. What I am getting at is :If These believers have unmoving faith in their creator Why petition (injunction ) against the experiment? Science has long proven their work saving lives and moving forward. Where is the trust in their faith- their creator?
In the Opinion section of the New Scientist mag. Feb. 2010 - there was an article that Cern was on trial for wanting to recreate the Big bang. Many faith believers opposed it. WORRIED scientist would create the black hole eliminating us as a whole. What I am getting at is :If These believers have unmoving faith in their creator Why petition (injunction ) against the experiment? Science has long proven their work saving lives and moving forward. Where is the trust in their faith- their creator?
In the Opinion section of the New Scientist mag. Feb. 2010 - there was an article that Cern was on trial for wanting to recreate the Big bang. Many faith believers opposed it. WORRIED scientist would create the black hole eliminating us as a whole. What I am getting at is :If These believers have unmoving faith in their creator - Why petition (injunction ) against the experiment? Science has long proven their work saving lives and moving forward. Where is the trust in their faith- their creator?
I'm not exactly a physicist, I am a Math major at a CA university. My question about this process is how can the collision show details of the big bang? I was under the impression that the big bang was an explosion that came from nothing. But here in the LHC, there are particles in existance that collide.
you can ask me how the universe works or the aliens or the ghosts or a number of multidimensional people, but maybe the ghosts don't understand and the aliens might tear your face off, so you might want to just ask me, but i only know about different dimensoins but that might only guide you.
It's a shame that this eems to be the extent of the documentation. Scientists are inherintly shortsighted. Hire 10 artists. Hire ten thinkers. 1 good artist could turn LHC into a decade and a half long festival. Kinda weird considering that they are the reason we can say so. Why such limp media? This vid is great, don't get me wrong, but shouldn't Cern be ranked higher than Kid Rock by now? =)
The mad CERN s project Rutherford studied atoms bombarding them with a- particles This idea helped him to understand the structure of atoms Then Devil gave advice to physicists to Bomb particles And physicists created LHC , CERN The artful Devil is glad He again deceived men Physicists think that LHC is first of all a huge energy And the Devil laughs He knows that CERN is first of all Vacuum But this he withheld from men Israel Sadovnik Socratus
This has to be the dumbest experiment ever. As a student of physics, and mathematics, I don't need to know about the big bang. I don't need to create a mini big bang or black hole which may swallow half the earth. I can't believe how excited and naiive this guy is. What a joke.
@ShortyScooby You're absolutely right. Brian worked at FermiLab before, with its smaller ring and that's where he got the 50K from. Misplaced memory :)
There's a hidden agenda behind this experiment anyway. Why spend billions during an economic crisis for an experiment unless it hold great significance to the near future. Ask Nasa
@mdma4life hey, mdma4life! still here promoting this crap? gotten any pussy in the last year or two? Awwww, that's too bad! I'll send you my paralysed, demented sister's address. just say when you're coming. i'll be sure to leave the door open.
The comment of mine that you just replied to was posted over a year ago
"gotten any pussy in the last year or two? Awwww, that's too bad! I'll send you my paralysed, demented sister's address"
... Have you EVER gotten any? Judging by the way you talk you must be a punk ass kid. Did they just teach you sex ed in school today? Taking out your sexual frustration on random youtube users? GJ, thumbs up
@mdma4life um not trying jump in your business or anything but this comment is fucked up "gotten any pussy in the last year or two? Awwww, that's too bad! I'll send you my paralysed, demented sister's address"
what the fuck is wrong with you? I understand he may be a prick for bringing up old shit but that was completely unnecessary . But whatever do you.
It is also built for the future, with upgradable cache, a 512 MB RAM slot, and a built in modem. This thing also has a ceiling tv in the tubes with all episodes of Seinfeld, for the protons, while they travel. Because even protons get bored.
You gotta love how they can't even predict themselves what is going to happen (secrets of the universe lmao) yet everyone claims it's ''of course, perfectly safe.''
Must be a sublime level of logic I have yet to attain.
This is the story of earth. A birthplace to an ancient and now extinct civilization - Humans. Then, an experiment took place in Cern, in mid 2008. Its purpose was to prove the existence of an elusive and fundamental particle of the Universe by many refered to as GOD particle. The results of that experiment were devastating, causing a rip in the universal fabric. Within moments gravity colapsed giving rise to a massive black hole that slowly engulfed Their entire star system.
FYI, the experiment is YET to be performed... and I predict the elusive Higg's Bosson will never be found... because the fundamental theory of atoms has some serious flaws everyone chooses to ignore. Darn the inconvenient flaws, they're such a nuisance, aren't they?
And no universes will collapse as a result of the experiments at Cern.
Personally, I believe the "Big Bang" theory will prove to be one of the biggest mistakes in the entire history of physics. The very notion is misguided and ludicrous, IMO. That said, it should be interesting to see if anything comes out of this very expensive paperweight.
Just my opinion. I believe the basic atomic concept is seriously flawed... it is based upon concepts that are so full of holes they will never be plugged until a complete rethink of reality is formed. But... good luck.
its funny, because the same concepts you think are "flawed" and "full of holes" were applicated in the building of the machine you have in front of you, a computer, and also support the mechanism you are using to express yourself, the internet.
If that is what you think, you really have no understanding of sub-atomic physics AT ALL (not even a little bit)... or you just don't "get" what I said. Atom smashing and the search for theoretical "particles" is an interesting experiment, but it will never (in my opinion) find what is being looked for because the fundamental theory of atoms is flawed. I won't bore you with the details.
Yes, I'm entirely familiar with most all things electronic. I was building single line telephone systems (one conductor, only, between sets) as a boy scout at age 13. i was building amplifiers by age 15... this was before the transistor was brand new. Just because a theory finds applications does not prove it is entirely correct. IMO there is a fundamental flaw in the conventional view of atomic structure... that is my opinion.
"To deny Ether is ultimately to assume the empty space is not (with) physical quality. The fundamental facts of (quantum) mechanics do not harmonize with this view. According to the General Relativity, space is embodied with physical quality. In this sense, therefore, there exists Ether. According to General Relativity, space without Ether is unthinkable"... quote by Albert Einstein.
The point is, atom smashers don't take into account the existence of an "Ether" and, thus, will not work.
You don't get what I'm trying to say, but it doesn't matter. They can smash protons together 'till the cows come home and it won't prove much of anything because the concept is fundamentally flawed. What would make the experiment more useful is to install neutron and helium detection units... I predict atom smashers will produce both... if the beam energy can be raised to a high enough level.
Your reply indicated, to me, you REALLY don't get it, nor have much understanding of particle physics, quantum physics, or string theory. So I won't waste any more words on you. You are brain-locked into you system of beliefs and would make a very poor scientist.
All of your posts indicate to me that you are completely ignorant of particle physics.
And have entirely missed the value of supporting evidence.
The concept far from being 'flawed' has been amazingly successful over the last 50 years. And has vastly increased our understanding of matter and physics.
that makes you an expert on physics? I've taken 6 courses of modern physics at university, yet that was only the introductory courses (because im not a physicist), and im happy to declare, i dont know about modern physics.
Cmon pick a book phisics (introductory if you want) and read something before speaking about things you know nothing about.
Quantum mechanics are flawed, you do realize that right. It took many years for those trained under classical principles to say that the universe operated under probability, something Einstein found very disturbing. BTDUBS Quantum mechanics wasn't necessarily applied in computing or the internet (ok maybe solid state physics, but still not the high energy stuff)
if i ever go to switzerland im going to hit the slopes, drink some hot chocolate, and collide some particles; i wonder if travelocity offers something like this
MrPentatonicScale 2 weeks ago
honestly?...
GingerBullet4 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
that very expensive and they really have a lot of physics there! i hope they understand the universe and share it to us.. :)
lovelplants 3 months ago
coxy...!!! :D
winonathequeen 4 months ago
@mtsw12
sorry, i was very susceptible to the media that time. so yep, now looking back i sound very ignorant and immature.
ultimatesimpsonsfan 8 months ago
"we've got PhD honours graduates", etc, etc... yeah, but i'd rather have had a big, brand new, fully specced, fully staffed excellent hospital for every EU nation. because that's what this farce has cost EU taxpayers.
rothkoaintdead 9 months ago
@rothkoaintdead Without this "farce" you wouldn't have half the things in a hospital.
9hello123 9 months ago
@9hello123 so you think the LHC project makes more/better equipment and human resources available for medical care across europe. that's not only ill considered; it reveals misguided assumptions about the cost/benefit of big science. people in medicine or healthcare would laugh at you. please evaluate your thoughts before presenting them as statements of fact. i did a lot of evidence gathering on the true total cost of the LHC and it's all in the public domain.
rothkoaintdead 9 months ago
@rothkoaintdead If it wasn't for particle accelerators you wouldn't have PET scanners, you wouldn't have the internet, you would have superconductors, you wouldn't have half of the things there is in a hospital. The LHC is brand new and ofcourse it obviously hasn't made discoveries that have made it into application yet, do you honestly think that governments would allow a technology into hospitals after only a couple of months of testing?
9hello123 9 months ago
@rothkoaintdead But saying that the LHC has already helped to develope super conductors for ITER. And good for you "doing a lot of evidence gathering" I know without a shadow of a doubt that unless you have a PhD in particle physics you do not know more about this than me.
9hello123 9 months ago
@9hello123 i'm only claiming to have carefully read and verified facts in the public domain. i also do not claim a superior knowledge. however, in our dialogue, i am making better reasoned and more intelligent comments than you. for this reason alone, my statements are more credible than yours.
rothkoaintdead 9 months ago
@9hello123 my initial comment was on socially responsible finance. public medicine, with its high costs and rewards is a good comparator: an unhealthy european workforce would be less able to work hard and multiply the wealth of the elites. this would make europe less competitive in world trade, less economically stable, and more politically vulnerable. we don't need an eventual trickle-down benefit to the public; we need capacity for people to work, spend, and enjoy upward mobility.
rothkoaintdead 9 months ago
Can the LHC really replicate the very earliest moments after the universe? Does anyone think it can make black holes, strangelets and vaccum bubbles?
fistchat 10 months ago
@9hello123 im sure Cern is being used to develop weapons for the government. If you dont think so then look at the manhattan project none of them knew the research they were conducting was for weaponization until it was too late.
selftaughtninja 10 months ago
@selftaughtninja
Have you actually looked at the Manhatton project? The physicists involved knew perfectly well what the results of it could be.
They also knew perfectly well what the results would be if the Nazi's were able to create a fission bomb.
Physicists do actually know physics quite well amazingly.
ytmoog 10 months ago
@selftaughtninja No one at the manhattan project knew?
Lol, what do you think they thought they were doing making a device that's only purpose is to completely destroy a large area? Do you think that building a nuclear bomb is easy or something? It's incredibly complicated and they need to know what they are doing. They can't just be told "Yeah go piss about with these elements until something happens"
9hello123 9 months ago
@9hello123 Umm I guess you seem to not know how those black projects are run. There many individual projects all classified as one. So yes most scienticists don't know what the goal is for. Let me give you an example theres a 100 mile fusion reactor I think in france. Yes fusion energy can be used for free energy but more than likely it will be the power source for some weapon that is being worked on somewhere else. There's always two sides. I know lots of examples.
selftaughtninja 9 months ago
@selftaughtninja You know lots of examples yet you've failed to mention one.
What your saying now is basically the same as the discoverer of metal is the same as making a nuclear bomb, since you need metal for one.
9hello123 9 months ago
@9hello123 hmm are you aware of the 300 letter cap where a person can only summarize what would prolly be a page in like 10 or 12 lines. No you wouldn't be aware of it. Because your vocabulary for insulting only stretches but so far. Second don't make stupid comebacks like the creator of metal. Let me give you an example for your simple brain to understand. Nuclear power aka the splitting of atoms can be used for more than bombs. Matter of fact they power majority of homes.
selftaughtninja 9 months ago
@selftaughtninja The Manhattan project wasn't developing nuclear power. It was developing nuclear bombs. Saying the discoverer of nuclear theory is the same as developing a nuclear bomb is exactly the same as saying the discoverer of metal is the same as developing a nuclear bomb. The Manhattan project was entirely designed to make a nuclear bomb. "Because your vocabulary for insulting" I'm fairly sure I haven't insulted you ,yet you've insulted me and every physicist.
9hello123 9 months ago
@9hello123 Ok your not understanding what I'm saying. I apologize for being insulting. All I'm saying is they lied to those scientists. I know thats what the government does. Because my uncle is a scientists and he tells me they mislead scientists. Some may know the real goal. But not most. Most scientists get lied to so that they build tech.A hadron collider is just a particle accelerator. If used for destruction would be really really bad. Especially a big one connected to a fusion reactor.
selftaughtninja 9 months ago
@selftaughtninja They didn't lie to the Manhattan project. They all knew what they were doing, they all were at the tests for the nuclear bombs and all continued working on it after them. All scientists know what they are researching for three reasons 1) Nearly all scientists work on their own research and they tell the government what they are researching, not the other way around. 2) Physics isn't just something you can start researching without any goal.
9hello123 9 months ago
@selftaughtninja 3) No one knows what research will find out, that's why its research. You can't just research how to make a better weapon.I know what the Hadron Collider is thanks(and it's just not a particle accelerator its a very specific type of particle accelerator).Connected to a fusion reactor?Well for one the hadron collider isn't connected to a fusion reactor. For two it couldn't be because the fusion reactor would just melt and stop being a fusion reactor and just become molten metal.
9hello123 9 months ago
@9hello123 lol.
selftaughtninja 9 months ago
@selftaughtninja France relies heavily on FISSION reactions to sustain their energy needs but, as of yet, fusion reaction is not sustainable. The university of Cambridge in England is the leader in the development of the technology. So far they have only achieved a 40 second reaction. The problem seems to lie in the containment of the high energy plasma. But, I digress. The promise of Fusion energy would be a godsend. and as far as I'm aware of, the joining of atoms is not a threat .
aravenidiot 3 months ago
@selftaughtninja
Buddy, I'm not sure where you get your "facts" but even students at MIT knew what they were working on. It's part of their cultrure now and one of the song that upper classmen teach the mewbies harolds their particapation in the manhattan development.
aravenidiot 3 months ago
@aravenidiot i made that comment a long time ago. And honestly dont care anymore. I doubt anyone knows what the Manhattan project was intentionally meant for but the government. And the military factions that they worked with. We can go back and forth or knowledge that we think we may know but in the end we're both running around in the dark pissing on each other with inadequate information claiming the other person is false indirectly.
selftaughtninja 3 months ago
it will not create a black hole. A very tiny singularity which prolly collapsed on itself.
selftaughtninja 10 months ago
Brian Cox is EPIC
Medicyanid3 10 months ago
Spanish (Original).
Hola. Yo necesito tu correo electrónico para yo enviarle a usted una nueva idea acerca de una posible nueva ecuación para la energía cinética relativista. Gracias por tu atención. Atentamente: José Gregorio Guevara Pérez desde la ciudad de Valencia, pais Venezuela. Mi correo electrónico es JGGP36@Yahoo.com.
jggp444 11 months ago
English language, translated from the Spanish language by Babel Fish.
Hello. I need your electronic mail I to send to you a new idea about a possible new equation for the relativistic kinetic energy. Thanks for your attention. Kindly: Jose Gregorio Guevara Perez from the city of Valencia, Venezuela country. My electronic mail is JGGP36@Yahoo.com.
jggp444 11 months ago
This is crazy if they perform this, black hole can be created on Earth and cause Doomsday.
kimjasonvega 11 months ago
@kimjasonvega
It has been running for over a year now.
Sorry to disappoint but you are not going to be getting your doomsday; however much you wish for it.
ytmoog 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Japan weather wars –
Noah = NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Japeth = Japan
Shem = sham/trick/fooling of people
Ham = radio wave technology/scalar handlers
They have genocide themselves
cynthiadupuy 11 months ago
So whats the latest on the search for the higgs boson? Have we found it yet?
Also here is the worst physics joke ever...
A higgs-boson walks into a church, the priest says “we don’t allow higgs-bosons in here.”
The higgs-boson says “but without me how can you have mass?"
aikighost 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
someone explain me, if in a particle accelerator if a particle is accelerated to near light velocity then as per this einstein's equation mass will reach near infinity as energy is conserved, then how is the accelerator stable and able to withstand such high mass gain
karthikmmc03 1 year ago
"imaging radars" +"mathforum" google.com.
fdlskfj854985 1 year ago
all this "God" shit is fucking stupid. if you guys think there is a a man or a woman that has unworldly powers and he decides who lives and who dies then you are fucking retarded. i think the big bang makes more sense of how the universe was created than some fucking man sitting in the sky, controlling everything. all you bible pushers go fuck yourself, because there is no god.
/rant
Hypersterikal 1 year ago
CERN is not only the largest scientific research laboratory in the world, CERN was also created to do research on weapons that will be used in the near future ...
if I'm wrong but someone will have heard about the plasma rifle ....
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy
You are wrong.
CERN is a civilian research organization which is unfortunate in a way as it means it has to struggle for funds.
Perhaps you should look into what it actually does?
ytmoog 1 year ago
@ytmoog What makes you think that this potential is exploited only for scientific research? :)
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy
Because there is absolutely no non-scientific reason for using the LHC.
But it is however essential for current research into particle physics and cosmology.
It is also worth noting that there are scientists from most of the countries on the planet working there.
ytmoog 1 year ago
@ytmoog
I know. CERN is also in secret weapons research .. and almost close to inventing the plasma rifle
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy
So secret you know all about it yet have absolutely no evidence.
Amazing.
Come back when you have something interesting rather than fiction.
ytmoog 1 year ago
@91Skulboy LMFAO
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 what ?
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy almost close to inventing the plasma rifle... Fucking idiot.
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 the idiot here is you .. did you read what I wrote to others or not?
I wrote that are very close to inventing the plasma rifle .... asshole shit. XD
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy I'm calling you an idiot because you say they are very close to inventing the plasma rifle you absolute moron.
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 use your brain. I'm not saying tomorrow will come on the market the plasma rifles .... because it is impossible .. I'm saying that they are neighbors in the sense that 10 years from now there may be the first directed energy weapons ... and know that this project and for many years that goes on ..... thanks to CERN now that mankind will make great strides in technology ...
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy You're saying CERN is involved in weapons research, which it clearly doesn't. Yes, CERN will make great strides in technology however not towards plasma rifles. And plasma isn't "directed energy".
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 What makes you think that a huge potential as CERN is not being used for military purposes? I am confused I have said before that the plasma rifle and directed energy ... the plasma rifle shoots bullets of energy composed of electrically charged matter composed of electrons, neutrons and protons. All this happens through a process of air ionization.
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@91Skulboy You know what? I'm just going to leave this argument, there's no discussion with people like you.
9hello123 1 year ago
@9hello123 I too think we should leave this topic ..... I can not convince by force ... I think as I said ... Think of it as you want.
91Skulboy 1 year ago
@ytmoog If it wasn't for the LHC PET scanners (which have saved countless lives) would never of been invented. Neither would a lot of current methods of cancer treatment, the internet would be a lot slower and more than likely to slow for it to ever of become commercial.
9hello123 1 year ago
what if this right here is the answer to every movie ever made.
In 2012, we successfully create a universe and destroy the one we live in. And it's all just part of the architect's plan to create a perfect universe.
jurtly 1 year ago
Wowowowowowow Hold up....
How could the "Big Bang" be created out of nothing if there was nothing in the universe at the time even the universe didn't exist nothing was there so what created the big bang? NOTHING. God created the universe not some myth of the "Big Bang". For something to be created you need a creator (God) and the creator has to be eternal so that means nothing created God he was always there and always will be.
People never learn untill they go to far and can't undo it.
adzii1 1 year ago
@adzii1 God would be just as much reductio ad infinitum as the universe. According to your logic, I could postulate that God was created by a pink fluffy unicorn and think that'd somehow be a valid answer.
lexagon 1 year ago
@adzii1 alright i agree with all of wat u just said just one thing the big bang was how good created this world so yes there was nothing before that god created this bag bang therfore the universe, are knowledge will be based on wat did god create for the big bang and how
deathvhuter 1 year ago
I'm just saying ... the religious orders say "Prove to me he does not exist" and scientist say” Prove to me he does exist.” Why not come together with this experiment and see what happens? Each wants an answer....
Pepper4001 1 year ago
In the Opinion section of New Scientist/ Feb. 2010 - there was an article that Cern was on trial for wanting to recreate the Big bang. Many faith believers opposed it. WORRIED scientist would create the black hole eliminating us as a whole. What I am getting at is :If These believers have unmoving faith in their creator Why petition (injunction ) against the experiment? Science has long proven their work saving lives and moving forward. Where is the trust in their faith- their creator?
Pepper4001 1 year ago
@Pepper4001
"In the Opinion section of New Scientist/ Feb. 2010..."
Which issue in Feb? New Scientist is a weekly.
ytmoog 1 year ago
In the Opinion section of the New Scientist mag. Feb. 2010 - there was an article that Cern was on trial for wanting to recreate the Big bang. Many faith believers opposed it. WORRIED scientist would create the black hole eliminating us as a whole. What I am getting at is :If These believers have unmoving faith in their creator Why petition (injunction ) against the experiment? Science has long proven their work saving lives and moving forward. Where is the trust in their faith- their creator?
Pepper4001 1 year ago
In the Opinion section of the New Scientist mag. Feb. 2010 - there was an article that Cern was on trial for wanting to recreate the Big bang. Many faith believers opposed it. WORRIED scientist would create the black hole eliminating us as a whole. What I am getting at is :If These believers have unmoving faith in their creator - Why petition (injunction ) against the experiment? Science has long proven their work saving lives and moving forward. Where is the trust in their faith- their creator?
Pepper4001 1 year ago
I'm not exactly a physicist, I am a Math major at a CA university. My question about this process is how can the collision show details of the big bang? I was under the impression that the big bang was an explosion that came from nothing. But here in the LHC, there are particles in existance that collide.
ayers007 1 year ago
@ayers007
What they are actually doing is replicating the energy levels which would have existed a (tiny) fraction of a second after the big bang.
ytmoog 1 year ago
Science sucks. Jesus is god.
Solipsisticfreelance 1 year ago
4 Tesla! Wow!
TheMaliPerica 1 year ago
Particle Physicists must sound INSANE to normal/dumb people.
And they are...
That's the funny thing.
I worship the Atom, Join the church or Science, It's the only 'religion' that's TRUE!
sorry, i'm on acid, i;m elated by this stuff.
DackIsBack 1 year ago
you can ask me how the universe works or the aliens or the ghosts or a number of multidimensional people, but maybe the ghosts don't understand and the aliens might tear your face off, so you might want to just ask me, but i only know about different dimensoins but that might only guide you.
volopok 1 year ago
Too much advertising everywhere. Too much excitement everywhere.
strangefruit64 1 year ago
how old is this boy?
I you kill us with your childish sense of things i will kill you!
RobertSpunkt 1 year ago
@RobertSpunkt
Brian Cox?
He's in his 40s.
You should relay to him that he should no longer be enthusiastic about his work.
ytmoog 1 year ago
@ytmoog
and you should do nothing at all.
RobertSpunkt 1 year ago
It's a shame that this eems to be the extent of the documentation. Scientists are inherintly shortsighted. Hire 10 artists. Hire ten thinkers. 1 good artist could turn LHC into a decade and a half long festival. Kinda weird considering that they are the reason we can say so. Why such limp media? This vid is great, don't get me wrong, but shouldn't Cern be ranked higher than Kid Rock by now? =)
ericberner 1 year ago
Gate in some beings from the dimension Nympho CERN please.
Silvertrine 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
socratus1 1 year ago
google Doe's Account, Its insane.
byussa 1 year ago
This has to be the dumbest experiment ever. As a student of physics, and mathematics, I don't need to know about the big bang. I don't need to create a mini big bang or black hole which may swallow half the earth. I can't believe how excited and naiive this guy is. What a joke.
BluCosmos 1 year ago
Best LHC film on youtube...
watch?v=2StRb3F0j6k
JRJC25 1 year ago
Leave, leave Geneva every last one of you,
Saturn will be converted from gold to iron,
RAYPOZ will exterminate all who oppose him,
Before the coming the sky will show signs
jaibobro 1 year ago
this stuff gives me a hadron.
lesorciercalifornien 1 year ago 24
@lesorciercalifornien hahahahaha Best comment yet.
loreniuska 1 year ago
hey guys any updates on LHC? i dont see anything yet
samgee2007 1 year ago
@samgee2007 Swiss Alps are trembiling, Volcano's erupting in Iceland, Nothing to do with Particle acceleration though, hey our lights just blinked..
TheProfessor1960 1 year ago
@ShortyScooby This speed is achieved with a series of high powered magnets, hence the name "proton accelerator".
sliderrider88 2 years ago
Yes, but not to speeds beyond light.
ShortyScooby 2 years ago
What I don't understand is at 1:35
He says the protons travel the circuit 50,000 per second. One circuit is 27km in circumference.
So the protons travel a distance of 50,000 * 27,000 metres in one second. Therefore its speed is 1,350,000,000 m/s.
Speed of light, however, is only ~300,000,000 m/s.
How are these protons travelling 4 and a half times the speed of light?
ShortyScooby 2 years ago
@ShortyScooby I don't understand either. At full speed of LHC protons will run almost as fast as light but of course not faster.
blacksolsticeovdeath 2 years ago
5000 cycles a second would be more understandable I guess- maybe a slip of the tongue?
But I've heard this statistic from more than one source =\
ShortyScooby 2 years ago
@ShortyScooby You're absolutely right. Brian worked at FermiLab before, with its smaller ring and that's where he got the 50K from. Misplaced memory :)
HiAdrian 1 year ago
@HiAdrian Ahh ok- Thanks Adrian! I figured something was amiss :P
May I ask if you have an affiliation at all with the CERN project?
ShortyScooby 1 year ago
truths? Do they tell you all matter is vibrating energy in school? That everything is energy -
mooners40 2 years ago
you mean it was planned way before they PLANNED the economic crisis?
nostikskull 2 years ago
date has relly set .lhc is restarting next thursday
muffles12 2 years ago
For space projects, a great advance.
Dauton102 2 years ago
all that happens is theytry to compress matter to a condition like the big bang. Then watch the magic unfold as it explodes
DarkKnightBob1o1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You arrogant assholes are gonna blow up the world.
OfficialFrizzo 2 years ago
Please don't talk about that which you do not understand, neanderthal.
braydenbeautiful 2 years ago
and I bet, this project would have the least amount of religious-based scientists to work on.
nakiflo 2 years ago
Why don't these people go feed the poor?
nakiflo 2 years ago
There's a hidden agenda behind this experiment anyway. Why spend billions during an economic crisis for an experiment unless it hold great significance to the near future. Ask Nasa
samsonwyldewynde 2 years ago
this had been planned way before the economic crisis
benkettle 2 years ago
I don't know but I have a bad feeling it's too complex and it will never work..
Battery9876 2 years ago 2
It already has been working well.
ytmoog 2 years ago
It has alread been operational, at 1.18 TeV per beam (previous record was 450 GeV per beam).
CERN undergoes an annual shutdown every year at the peak months of energy consumption (people heating their homes in the winter).
It will begin operation again on Feb 20/2010, at scaled up energies of 3.5 TeV per beam
mdma4life 2 years ago 3
how do you know if its on the 20th of feb?
CrafterRuneGuide 2 years ago
@mdma4life hey, mdma4life! still here promoting this crap? gotten any pussy in the last year or two? Awwww, that's too bad! I'll send you my paralysed, demented sister's address. just say when you're coming. i'll be sure to leave the door open.
rothkoaintdead 9 months ago
@rothkoaintdead
"hey, mdma4life! still here promoting this crap?"
The comment of mine that you just replied to was posted over a year ago
"gotten any pussy in the last year or two? Awwww, that's too bad! I'll send you my paralysed, demented sister's address"
... Have you EVER gotten any? Judging by the way you talk you must be a punk ass kid. Did they just teach you sex ed in school today? Taking out your sexual frustration on random youtube users? GJ, thumbs up
mdma4life 9 months ago
@mdma4life um not trying jump in your business or anything but this comment is fucked up "gotten any pussy in the last year or two? Awwww, that's too bad! I'll send you my paralysed, demented sister's address"
what the fuck is wrong with you? I understand he may be a prick for bringing up old shit but that was completely unnecessary . But whatever do you.
selftaughtninja 9 months ago
when is this machine finish?
zxaviusLOL 2 years ago
It is planned to run for 10 years or so, with an upgrade half way.
ytmoog 2 years ago
It is also built for the future, with upgradable cache, a 512 MB RAM slot, and a built in modem. This thing also has a ceiling tv in the tubes with all episodes of Seinfeld, for the protons, while they travel. Because even protons get bored.
BluCosmos 1 year ago
You gotta love how they can't even predict themselves what is going to happen (secrets of the universe lmao) yet everyone claims it's ''of course, perfectly safe.''
Must be a sublime level of logic I have yet to attain.
alleyghost 2 years ago
It is called 'knowledge',
Cosmic rays have been hitting the planet for billions of years, many of which at energies vastly higher than anything the LHC will manage.
In short there is absolutely no evidence of any danger from this, and plenty of observational evidence that it is safe.
ytmoog 2 years ago
protons go around about 10 thousand times per second in the tunnel
medeerbeer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this thing is gonna kill us in december
Jintamil 2 years ago
KevinJuris 2 years ago
FYI, the experiment is YET to be performed... and I predict the elusive Higg's Bosson will never be found... because the fundamental theory of atoms has some serious flaws everyone chooses to ignore. Darn the inconvenient flaws, they're such a nuisance, aren't they?
And no universes will collapse as a result of the experiments at Cern.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
Are you being sarcastic or something? I can't tell.
pandaman0529 2 years ago
No im not being sarcastic
KevinJuris 2 years ago
Personally, I believe the "Big Bang" theory will prove to be one of the biggest mistakes in the entire history of physics. The very notion is misguided and ludicrous, IMO. That said, it should be interesting to see if anything comes out of this very expensive paperweight.
Just my opinion. I believe the basic atomic concept is seriously flawed... it is based upon concepts that are so full of holes they will never be plugged until a complete rethink of reality is formed. But... good luck.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
its funny, because the same concepts you think are "flawed" and "full of holes" were applicated in the building of the machine you have in front of you, a computer, and also support the mechanism you are using to express yourself, the internet.
DemokritosAbdera 2 years ago
If that is what you think, you really have no understanding of sub-atomic physics AT ALL (not even a little bit)... or you just don't "get" what I said. Atom smashing and the search for theoretical "particles" is an interesting experiment, but it will never (in my opinion) find what is being looked for because the fundamental theory of atoms is flawed. I won't bore you with the details.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
so you are an expert in physics? do you understand whats going on in the processor in your pc?
DemokritosAbdera 2 years ago
Yes, I'm entirely familiar with most all things electronic. I was building single line telephone systems (one conductor, only, between sets) as a boy scout at age 13. i was building amplifiers by age 15... this was before the transistor was brand new. Just because a theory finds applications does not prove it is entirely correct. IMO there is a fundamental flaw in the conventional view of atomic structure... that is my opinion.
You don't know what you are talking about... IMO.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
"To deny Ether is ultimately to assume the empty space is not (with) physical quality. The fundamental facts of (quantum) mechanics do not harmonize with this view. According to the General Relativity, space is embodied with physical quality. In this sense, therefore, there exists Ether. According to General Relativity, space without Ether is unthinkable"... quote by Albert Einstein.
The point is, atom smashers don't take into account the existence of an "Ether" and, thus, will not work.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
Yet the fact is that 'atom smashers' have been used and worked very well for decades.
You really don't seem to know what you are talking about.
ytmoog 2 years ago
You don't get what I'm trying to say, but it doesn't matter. They can smash protons together 'till the cows come home and it won't prove much of anything because the concept is fundamentally flawed. What would make the experiment more useful is to install neutron and helium detection units... I predict atom smashers will produce both... if the beam energy can be raised to a high enough level.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
The concept has been extremely successful over the last 50 years.
And many new particles have been discovered in this way.
"neutron and helium" are pointless. We know those exist :)
And the LHC will produce neither, the energies are two high.
Nor would they want to.
ytmoog 2 years ago
Your reply indicated, to me, you REALLY don't get it, nor have much understanding of particle physics, quantum physics, or string theory. So I won't waste any more words on you. You are brain-locked into you system of beliefs and would make a very poor scientist.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
All of your posts indicate to me that you are completely ignorant of particle physics.
And have entirely missed the value of supporting evidence.
The concept far from being 'flawed' has been amazingly successful over the last 50 years. And has vastly increased our understanding of matter and physics.
To deny that is futile, and ignorant.
ytmoog 2 years ago
that makes you an expert on physics? I've taken 6 courses of modern physics at university, yet that was only the introductory courses (because im not a physicist), and im happy to declare, i dont know about modern physics.
Cmon pick a book phisics (introductory if you want) and read something before speaking about things you know nothing about.
DemokritosAbdera 2 years ago
*book physics
DemokritosAbdera 2 years ago
You are an idiot. I said it, I mean it. I don't waste time on morons... goodbye.
DavidSIlvercloud 2 years ago
Quantum mechanics are flawed, you do realize that right. It took many years for those trained under classical principles to say that the universe operated under probability, something Einstein found very disturbing. BTDUBS Quantum mechanics wasn't necessarily applied in computing or the internet (ok maybe solid state physics, but still not the high energy stuff)
pandaman0529 2 years ago