@infodim1 Einstein didn't prove it, "just" predicted it. To prove such a small effect as this one requires precise instruments and even so they are not flawless, so the experiment *needs* to be run for several years to avoid concluding anything with just one year's data (which likely contains little but significant measurement errors).
Congratufuckinglations NASA... you have proved the gravito-magnetic (gravity's "magnetic" component) effect which exist around all spinning objects with mass -.-
Has been known to greater effect spinning superconductors as gravito-magnetic amplifying materials because of their Bose-Einstein condensate properties.
it wasn't until the 19 ninety's that the pope and the vatican finally admitted that the earth is not the center of the solar system... humans are easily brainwashed. I find religion not only false but borderline offensive. the point of my previous post was that science won religion lost. The battle is over... I give it 20 years before 90 percent of humans are agnostic or atheist
@HackNinja420 Non-relativistic physics wasn't dogma, it corresponded to all physical observations that had ever been made, until the end of the 1800s.
OKAY I SAW THAT DAMNED LEMMING ADVERTISEMENT AND NOW I'M PISSED.
Vote for the guy who's going to win??? SO YOU CAN BE RIGHT??? America isn't a goddamned game show and you don't get to be smart by being average dumb bastards.
@lilillbill I don't understand the question much but as far as I know the gravitational pull of the sun isn't strong enough to change the planet's orbits
All based on the observation through sensory awareness. So FOR NOW, you may have gained a little more perspective. Gain a few more senses and this will change.
@chickzey The Sun itself is moving though the galaxy as with its sister stars and is `dragging' along its children, ie the planets & other baryonic matter forms that make up the solar system. It's this drag force that eccentricates the orbits of the planets since the strength of the gravitational fields are weakly coupled in such a way that the attractive force is considered elastic, stretching & contracting the orbits shape in to an ellipse. see: Kepler's laws of planetary motion.
I don't really get it...What power is it that makes so that the smaller ball (earth) does not collide with the larger ball (the sun) when it falls down in the pit (the curved space-time )...? What is it that makes so that our planet can pass the sun without getting closer ... and all other planets for that matter....anyone..?
okay boys, here's one: how would this gravity fabric interact with a flat dense surface? Y'know, on it's own, the universe never creates a flat surface. Or perfect right angles. Or non-elliptical orbits. Write for us an equation about gravity reacting to a flat dense surface; put the model in the solar gravitational plane (so this flat object is in orbit around the sun). For fun, use the dimensions (any size) of Kubrick's monolith. Win a notional set of steak knives, show them off to yer friends
@RingSight91 I was speaking of defining time specifically, not measuring it. Excuse me for not being clear. BTW, the quantum clock is more precise than the atomic clock if you want to keep time, or measure it.
@KidloHighHorse Yeah but good luck packing a Quantum Clock along for your journey. The Atomic Clock is difficult enough to house and isolate in a fixed facility. Imagine one having ions needing to be cooled by lasers to near absolute zero?
Hey lastscene! Which one was here first and which one will be here after? the moon or your dependable atomic clock? Please end your indoctrination to acedemics, step up to the metaphysics and stop being so full of yourself. It is an absolute 'no sale' with your fellow humanbeings.
time is defined by motion, our most dependable device in measuring time is the orbit of the moon. the moon's motion defines our time. Einstein said it, not me.
@KidloHighHorse What?! "Our most dependable device in measuring time is the orbit of the moon"?! I guess your computer which syncs its time with the NIST Time Server based off an Atomic Clock was a huge waste of programming time and effort then.
I knew this for a long time. Time is motion. People think of time as a noun (the reason why entirely escapes me), but time is actually a verb. TIME IS MOTION! That's why time travel will never be possible, other than "forward" or "stopped".
Time actually does slow down closer to the center of a massive object. At the singularity of a black hole, gravity is infinite and time is 0. A less severe phenomenon happens in our common world, but not enough so that we notice.
So; your head is actually older than your feet. It may be microseconds, but it's still true.
@fingerboy18 I understand that your head(in most cases) is born into this world somewhat earlier than your feet. But when you are born you already spent nine months in the womb and I cant tell if your head is formed earlier than your feet.
Or is this just an example of how time is relative?
@fingerboy18 In daily life the concept of time seemes easy I wake up at 7 go to bed at eleven and the time in between is divided in parts in which I have to fullfill a specific role, but when I think of the theory about time I just cant seem to comprehend!
@iRouRoui well think of space as a jar of honey and earth is a spoon twisting in the middle of the jar. Now as the spoon twists it creates a rotating and pressurised space around it and that is twisting time. Nah jokes i dono shit about this lol
But im sure if you read their research papers you will get the stuff
@iRouRoui I think time is defined by motion through space. Herman Minkowski decided to use time as a fourth dimension and connected it to the three spatial dimensions by the speed of light. In this way he was able to create a geometric theory of Special Relativity based on the concept of a four-dimensional continuum he called Space-time. Einstein then used this concept in his General Theory of Relativity, in which Space-time became equivalent with the gravitational field.
@endofscene Thank's, but I have no idea what you just said. All I know is that time, is just time, and we're all living in it at the same time, I still don't see how you can think of it differently. Because the way scientists talk about time makes me think that "me-in-the-past" and "me-of-the-future" are living right now at the same time, which doesn't make sense to me at all.
@iRouRoui I understand. But it is true that you in the past and you in the future are living right now. It seems to be a matter of perspective, but I do not fully understand it myself. However, it is the concept that everything that ever has happened or ever will happen is happening right now in the present. There is no time as it is commonly understood. Time does not pass, per se, rather things change in space, or our perception of things changes, in the eternal now.
@iRouRoui Time is related to Space in that your Time can Slow Down the faster you go and the closer you get to the speed of light. That's been proven through experimentation. Two atomic clocks were synced to the same Time, one remained on the ground while the other went on a round the world flight. When later compared the one that flew was a little behind by milliseconds, proving that moving through Space (not just "outer" space) is also moving through Time. And as Space is expanding, Time too.
@Sidepiece2 To avoid aging, you have to travel at the speed of light, so time stands still. If you want to live only twice as long, you have to travel your entire life at 260,000 km/s (86% of speed of light). Which is 936,000,000 kph or 582,000,000 mph, Good Luck!
@Sidepiece2 Also, if you travel your whole life at a speed close to the speed of light. To you, it would feel like a normal short life (ie. 80 years). Only the people on earth will observe that you have been travelling/living for many more years compared to them.
@Sidepiece2 If you fly in a plane (Mach 2 or 2124 kph or 1320mph) for 80 years, you will have lived 0,005 seconds longer than the people on the surface :)
Each moment continually eludes me. Time I realize as "NOW", is later than I thought. What's to come has already been. Timespace enfolded by photons that compress to a 2-D version containing 3-D timespace. 2-D photons exclude voltage/current, exhibiting properties of magnetism until TS opens closer to our timespace quantum level at the top of the energy turned stone. T.O.E. NEED HELP w/MATH
if time is distorted by movement... wouldn't that also make our measurements to other planets/stars wrong?? because the time would be distorted therefore
"1 Lightyear" would be
"the distance light travels in 1 year without going near anything but earth"
@Danrakich with the theory of special relativity if you are moving at 99 percent the speed of light one light year would only take one day from your perspective. light moves at an unvariable speed and one light year is a distance calculated without gravity taken into account
@Danrakich it is just gravity, as gravity pullas spacetime towards the center of earth, for example, the rotation of the earth causes a swirl in spacetime this is a result of space and time being one 'fabric' as einstien said, time isn't moving in a strange pattern at all it's moving as einstien said it would due to gravity
Question then. If mass creates a trampoline effect in space time, where is the plane? For something to create this indentation, say on our trampoline, that would imply that it is sitting on a flat surface to create this indentation. So where is the plane of space time that we sit upon?
@maghee317 You're looking at it wrong. See, to be able to physically imagine the effect you have to replace one dimension with another. A better if more difficult to sympathize way is that this [plane] were omnipresent in our physical dimensions, and the [depressions] would be more like blobs where they'd be located in each physical dimension.
@maghee317 here is a better 3d representation of space-time. Most test books/videos use a 2d representation because it's easier to graphically depict/explain.
@maghee317 the plane is everywhere the trampoline is a two dimensional representation of three dimentional space and time is thrown out all together. space and time are distorted, but space is pulled inwards towards the center of earth
@TheWtfnousername ...and completely arbitrary, Any basis of absolute time would have to be "relative" to a zero point. Newton's theory works well for the acceleration and gravitation we experience every day, but relativity explains the bigger picture.
Wow. Im so impressed. The way these 2 have actually managed to explain absolutely nothing about the discovery or the implications of it is mindboggling. I take this video as a personal insult. From the looks of it these 2 would have a hard time even changing an infants diaper.
@ElectricSparq lol, forget Einstein? What about all of the predictions that Einstein and the theory have made that have been confirmed? We see light being bent by gravity, and we have to constantly compensate for time dilation on our gps satellites...
@ElectricSparq "Einstein" and "his cronies"? You can subscribe to whatever scientific philosophy you want, but you really just sound like a troll here.
@ElectricSparq Tesla I know, Russell has an interesting perspective and I intend to read more on him. But from what I read on wiki, Keely was a shyster.
I see multiple videos talking about this but no one is saying what the implication is. What does this mean on Earth relative to the rest of the Universe?
@FlargidyTV I dont think it means much. It was long predicted by special relativity, just like black holes were and then they were confirmed. It seems like it wasn't even unexpected, just further evidence in favor of special relativity.
@Neueregel: Exactly. There are so many proofs of general relativity that it’s barely conceivable why there are still people who seriously doubt it. Newer proofs just give higher precision, that’s all. See atomic clock experiments, gravitational lensing research, loss of energy in dual star systems, gravitational time dilation and whatnot.
The theories on time seem to be irrelevant since time is only for those who have an end for endless and ageless there is no time.
Even if a person travels at the speed of light the time does not stop for him for his time is ticking with his heart beats, he can not detach himself from time. The time will only stop for him, at whatever speed he travels, when his heart stops and he is dead. I feel these theories have more of the form than the substance.
In space there is no direction..so the earth should apply same pressure above it due to its rotation, creating a dent in that imaginary space time axis. Nice attempt though...
in short if some views the earth upside down so that south pole is on top- explain that now!!!
NASA and Einstein FAILS with Gravity Probe B tests. Let us assume everything that was said it right. That the Earth can rest on the 'Frame of the Universe' and is dragging in Space-Time. That means the Sun does the same being of greater gravitational force. Like a bowling ball on a giant rubber like sheet material. Anyone would assume the Earth a small ball, would be falling TOWARD the Sun because of the drag and the Sun's influence. EXCEPT THE EARTH IS MOVING AWAY FROM THE SUN. GRADE F-.
@sclausi30 I read this a while ago not sure 100% sure on accuracy but if you are interested you can look it up.
"...our planet's mass is raising a tiny but sustained tidal bulge in the sun. They calculate that, thanks to Earth, the sun's rotation rate is slowing by 3 milliseconds per century (0.00003 second per year). According to their explanation, the distance between the Earth and sun is growing because the sun is losing its angular momentum..."
@PhalanxSystem: It’s the same mechanism that’s working in the earth-moon system—eventually leading to tidal locking of both. That’s because the angular momentum is conserved in the system.
@Dilshan123321 No. That will never happen. Imagine that space-time is a trampoline. Imagine Earth as a person. If a person sits on the trampoline, things get closer to them. Imagine the Moon as a ball. If I put a ball on the trampoline, the ball will come close to the person. This is (sort of) a simulation about the gravitational pull.
The real question is; how did one man (Einstein) without the technology, tools of modern science was able to describe or theorize what it will take decades hundred if not thousands of people and millions of dollars to confirm? Maybe he cheated; he travel from to the future and started talking about stuff that was common knowledge to all.
@bicnarok Yes you are right, time is measurable, relativity doesnt prove that its the 4th dimension, rather nothing proves there is a fourth dimension unless we see objects and humans appear out of the blue, like ghosts or yogis..
@TheDailyConversation You can't travel back in time, just to to the future. When youre driving or running your life will be longer, a little bit but longer.When supermans mate will be as old as him,and superman will fly around earth fast enough .... Than when he will stop he will be younger that his mate on earth... True story, sory for my english
@theRekcabofD: Be wary of your physics teachers and texts. You will have to answer "text referenced " on your tests, but don't place blind faith in said texts. E.g., you will find most texts have the wrong explanation of what a photon is and how they move. The most popular mistake is "a magnetic field propagates an electric field which in turn propagates a magnetic field," ad infintum.That could not be more wrong. Since both are forms of the same force, one cannot propagate the other. peace
@theRekcabofD With all due respect, in a word, no. However, it was very good thinking. The moon slows the earth's rotation as the earth slowed the moon's rotation. I can see how one might reach that conclusion. But there is no friction between the 2 orbs. Since gravity has no rest mass, (an "off and on again" debate in small quarters) there is only "Frame Drag." Friction requres two objects with rest mass, proximity, gravity, & their realtive motion. Email my chnl to discuss:-)love this stuff.
Every science magazine they keep having "was Einstein Wong" on the cover, and every time they get data he's proven right yet again. DON'T QUESTION THE MASTER, son. Schooled by Einstein again.
@fantasticshokh are you absolutely positive that if you do that you'll get the same exact einstein? what about growing up? what if something happens along the way and he takes the wrong path? or he gets an accident and his brain malfunctions. or his parents did something else that made him a genius and you're not able to do it with the clone.
@fantasticshokh having been raised in this time rather than nearly four hundred years ago isaac newton would be a quantum physicist and would have new beliefs. are you referring to his belief that the second coming of christ will be in the year 2060?
It doesn't confirm time, it confirms that matter distorts space. It has nothing to do with time. In fact, no experiment has ever confirmed that time is a specific force or dimension, or even a component of either. Hence the papers in Physics Essays by Amrit Sorli, Davide Fiscaletti, and Dusan Klinar from the Scientific Research Centre Bistra in Ptuj, Slovenia in which they consider that time may not exist at all except as a serial measurement of distance or frequency.
@OriginalTharios True, time is simply "energy dependent motion over a distance." It is an artifact of a human Newtonian construct, obligatory to General Relativity. Since time is energy dependent, there can be no such thing as time travel into the past. Time dilation, as in the Twin Paradox makes many think that time travel is possible. It is not and never will be. You cannot "un-use" that energy. You can only use more. Email my channel for discussion. I love this stuff.
I don't understand the principles fully, but from what I did grasp this is very interesting. I will have to look into it more to fully understand. Great video as always!
@calmreason Must have went over their heads, alot of it went over mine. But how can you not respect the patience and diligence of those involved...52 years!
What boggles my mind is Einstein had no way to test his predictions, yet he made them. He might have made a mistake in his calculations which experimental results would uncover, but he did not have that option.
@menthol5 People have proposed that he stole his ideas from other people, after all he did work at a patent office, and failed at math when in school.
@DJMight rather then trash Einstein with bullshit rumors give some facts. He won a Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect. He discovered the wave/particle duality of light. He determined the speed of light to be the limiting factor in cosmic communication. Einstein worked at Princeton. He was brilliant. What is your fucking problem?
The probe does not confirm anything except that a force may exist that acts upon same in a manner that COULD be a gravitational fluctuation as predicted by Einstein.
Similar results can be expected through other effects, and any possible relationship withto space-time warp theories is very possibly co-incidental. Not everything that sounds like like a fart is a fart.
I'm not sure how this is new, since it's pretty much been known for years. The time differences based on gravity is not only tested, but practical (effects GPS's).
Maybe I'm not understanding this story enough. I'll have to read the full article me thinks.
@bersaba This experiment has proved that Gravity literally warps space time. The effect of gravity on time was tested a long time ago the the astronomer Shapiro but no experiment was ever conducted to measure the twisting of space time.
@whittle4u This makes GPS work and increases the chances of keeping people alive by providing aircrafts with a precision navigation system. And so does his Theory of Special Relativity. Also not to forget the Spontaneous Emission of Photons from Bose-Einstein Correlations that makes LASERS work.
@muzammilali007 Yes we do but they became possible only because of the physics einstein discovered. The same is true for other discoveries in science. And he didn't put them forward thinking; hmmmmm, one day people will invent GPS for navigation and lasers for optics and a zillion other things.
Michio Kaku had address the existence of possibly up to 9 dimensions. It is addressed in his string theory. Einstein was a theoretical physicist while Tesla was a hands on inventor and once again people are left unaware of his contribution due to the fact that the US govt confiscated his personal papers upon his death. Sad
Michio Kaku has written about the possible existence of more than 3 dimensions, possibly up to 9 dimensions. This is included in his string theory. But what is upsetting to me here is that once again Nikola Tesla has been left completely out of the picture concerning space time. Einstein was a theoretical physicist while Tesla was a hands on inventor. He produced personal experiment on this very subject but all was lost when the US govt confiscated his personal papers after his death.
@rageatm4life Not really, try to imagine a sort of whirlpool of space moving around the earth, the vacumn of space is being twisted in this vortex caused by the Gravity of earth. Since the earth is so small, relatively speaking it is pretty imperceptible and needs extremely sensitive detectors to measure it.
What it says is that there is a space time field around the earth.
Nasa:52 yrs
Einstien:Probably 1 year:D
infodim1 4 days ago
@infodim1 Einstein didn't prove it, "just" predicted it. To prove such a small effect as this one requires precise instruments and even so they are not flawless, so the experiment *needs* to be run for several years to avoid concluding anything with just one year's data (which likely contains little but significant measurement errors).
sebagr 4 days ago
Congratufuckinglations NASA... you have proved the gravito-magnetic (gravity's "magnetic" component) effect which exist around all spinning objects with mass -.-
Has been known to greater effect spinning superconductors as gravito-magnetic amplifying materials because of their Bose-Einstein condensate properties.
melis256 1 week ago
1:41
left guy: please shoot me!
SeanMartinisMyName 1 week ago
it wasn't until the 19 ninety's that the pope and the vatican finally admitted that the earth is not the center of the solar system... humans are easily brainwashed. I find religion not only false but borderline offensive. the point of my previous post was that science won religion lost. The battle is over... I give it 20 years before 90 percent of humans are agnostic or atheist
HackNinja420 1 week ago
52 years of real data destroyed thousands of years of dogma... science for the win
HackNinja420 2 weeks ago
@HackNinja420 Non-relativistic physics wasn't dogma, it corresponded to all physical observations that had ever been made, until the end of the 1800s.
gorgolyt 1 week ago
I totally expected to see a bunch of religious fanatics saying this is false science and that god spins the earth lol
HackNinja420 2 weeks ago
OKAY I SAW THAT DAMNED LEMMING ADVERTISEMENT AND NOW I'M PISSED.
Vote for the guy who's going to win??? SO YOU CAN BE RIGHT??? America isn't a goddamned game show and you don't get to be smart by being average dumb bastards.
YCDPKLD 2 weeks ago
naza nazis.. i dono......
369indigo 2 weeks ago
ur both fags who read stuff off ur macbooks instead actually explaining stuff
dlav321 2 weeks ago
NASA=Never A Straight Answer, and this guys have Macs!!! argh :)
...so I guess we can't really trust any of them
salex2500 2 weeks ago
@salex2500 What a stupid comment
DonGanoo 2 weeks ago
@lilillbill I don't understand the question much but as far as I know the gravitational pull of the sun isn't strong enough to change the planet's orbits
thepaperbag000 2 weeks ago
how was he so clever
jayzibbit 3 weeks ago
All based on the observation through sensory awareness. So FOR NOW, you may have gained a little more perspective. Gain a few more senses and this will change.
heyblindref 3 weeks ago
If Einstein was right, how come then earth's orbit around the sun is elliptic ?
chickzey 3 weeks ago
@chickzey The Sun itself is moving though the galaxy as with its sister stars and is `dragging' along its children, ie the planets & other baryonic matter forms that make up the solar system. It's this drag force that eccentricates the orbits of the planets since the strength of the gravitational fields are weakly coupled in such a way that the attractive force is considered elastic, stretching & contracting the orbits shape in to an ellipse. see: Kepler's laws of planetary motion.
netsight 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't really get it...What power is it that makes so that the smaller ball (earth) does not collide with the larger ball (the sun) when it falls down in the pit (the curved space-time )...? What is it that makes so that our planet can pass the sun without getting closer ... and all other planets for that matter....anyone..?
lilillbill 3 weeks ago
dont answer the survey,wait a few seconds and it goes away.
pecopete3 3 weeks ago
okay boys, here's one: how would this gravity fabric interact with a flat dense surface? Y'know, on it's own, the universe never creates a flat surface. Or perfect right angles. Or non-elliptical orbits. Write for us an equation about gravity reacting to a flat dense surface; put the model in the solar gravitational plane (so this flat object is in orbit around the sun). For fun, use the dimensions (any size) of Kubrick's monolith. Win a notional set of steak knives, show them off to yer friends
korgri 3 weeks ago
I agree Eintstien was a magnificent mind but NASA still lies more often then Obama just sad
bryanmccarey100 3 weeks ago
boooooriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing video
shyimpression 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
stupid. there's only one dimension of spacetime. idiots. einstein was off.
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
@RingSight91 I was speaking of defining time specifically, not measuring it. Excuse me for not being clear. BTW, the quantum clock is more precise than the atomic clock if you want to keep time, or measure it.
KidloHighHorse 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KidloHighHorse time is a fractal dimension relative to space.
c16gregjockca 1 month ago
@KidloHighHorse Yeah but good luck packing a Quantum Clock along for your journey. The Atomic Clock is difficult enough to house and isolate in a fixed facility. Imagine one having ions needing to be cooled by lasers to near absolute zero?
RingSight91 3 weeks ago
Hey lastscene! Which one was here first and which one will be here after? the moon or your dependable atomic clock? Please end your indoctrination to acedemics, step up to the metaphysics and stop being so full of yourself. It is an absolute 'no sale' with your fellow humanbeings.
KidloHighHorse 1 month ago
time is defined by motion, our most dependable device in measuring time is the orbit of the moon. the moon's motion defines our time. Einstein said it, not me.
KidloHighHorse 1 month ago
@KidloHighHorse What?! "Our most dependable device in measuring time is the orbit of the moon"?! I guess your computer which syncs its time with the NIST Time Server based off an Atomic Clock was a huge waste of programming time and effort then.
RingSight91 1 month ago
Guy on the left is cute.
jlmadill 1 month ago
I knew this for a long time. Time is motion. People think of time as a noun (the reason why entirely escapes me), but time is actually a verb. TIME IS MOTION! That's why time travel will never be possible, other than "forward" or "stopped".
AcrossTheEchoes 1 month ago
@AcrossTheEchoes time is relative.
EZtrollin 1 month ago
Time actually does slow down closer to the center of a massive object. At the singularity of a black hole, gravity is infinite and time is 0. A less severe phenomenon happens in our common world, but not enough so that we notice.
So; your head is actually older than your feet. It may be microseconds, but it's still true.
fingerboy18 1 month ago
@fingerboy18 how do you measure time?
DKF22 1 month ago
@DKF22 a watch bro
abahawas 1 month ago
@abahawas ROFL
DKF22 1 month ago
@fingerboy18 I understand that your head(in most cases) is born into this world somewhat earlier than your feet. But when you are born you already spent nine months in the womb and I cant tell if your head is formed earlier than your feet.
Or is this just an example of how time is relative?
bazz0308 1 week ago
@fingerboy18 In daily life the concept of time seemes easy I wake up at 7 go to bed at eleven and the time in between is divided in parts in which I have to fullfill a specific role, but when I think of the theory about time I just cant seem to comprehend!
bazz0308 1 week ago
I still don't get this "time" thing, how the fuck is it related to space ?!
iRouRoui 1 month ago
@iRouRoui well think of space as a jar of honey and earth is a spoon twisting in the middle of the jar. Now as the spoon twists it creates a rotating and pressurised space around it and that is twisting time. Nah jokes i dono shit about this lol
But im sure if you read their research papers you will get the stuff
appleapple50 1 month ago
@appleapple50 lol
iRouRoui 1 month ago
@iRouRoui I think time is defined by motion through space. Herman Minkowski decided to use time as a fourth dimension and connected it to the three spatial dimensions by the speed of light. In this way he was able to create a geometric theory of Special Relativity based on the concept of a four-dimensional continuum he called Space-time. Einstein then used this concept in his General Theory of Relativity, in which Space-time became equivalent with the gravitational field.
endofscene 1 month ago
@endofscene Thank's, but I have no idea what you just said. All I know is that time, is just time, and we're all living in it at the same time, I still don't see how you can think of it differently. Because the way scientists talk about time makes me think that "me-in-the-past" and "me-of-the-future" are living right now at the same time, which doesn't make sense to me at all.
iRouRoui 1 month ago
@iRouRoui I understand. But it is true that you in the past and you in the future are living right now. It seems to be a matter of perspective, but I do not fully understand it myself. However, it is the concept that everything that ever has happened or ever will happen is happening right now in the present. There is no time as it is commonly understood. Time does not pass, per se, rather things change in space, or our perception of things changes, in the eternal now.
endofscene 1 month ago
@iRouRoui Time is related to Space in that your Time can Slow Down the faster you go and the closer you get to the speed of light. That's been proven through experimentation. Two atomic clocks were synced to the same Time, one remained on the ground while the other went on a round the world flight. When later compared the one that flew was a little behind by milliseconds, proving that moving through Space (not just "outer" space) is also moving through Time. And as Space is expanding, Time too.
RingSight91 1 month ago
@RingSight91 so to avoid aging I just need to fly supersonic planes? :D
Sidepiece2 4 weeks ago 2
@Sidepiece2 To avoid aging, you have to travel at the speed of light, so time stands still. If you want to live only twice as long, you have to travel your entire life at 260,000 km/s (86% of speed of light). Which is 936,000,000 kph or 582,000,000 mph, Good Luck!
sh1monn 3 weeks ago
@Sidepiece2 Also, if you travel your whole life at a speed close to the speed of light. To you, it would feel like a normal short life (ie. 80 years). Only the people on earth will observe that you have been travelling/living for many more years compared to them.
sh1monn 3 weeks ago
@Sidepiece2 If you fly in a plane (Mach 2 or 2124 kph or 1320mph) for 80 years, you will have lived 0,005 seconds longer than the people on the surface :)
You decide if it its worth it lol
sh1monn 3 weeks ago
@sh1monn I think I'm just going to go the speed of light squared and go back in time. O_o durp.
Sidepiece2 3 weeks ago
'vortex'... leaving.
kiomn 1 month ago
Each moment continually eludes me. Time I realize as "NOW", is later than I thought. What's to come has already been. Timespace enfolded by photons that compress to a 2-D version containing 3-D timespace. 2-D photons exclude voltage/current, exhibiting properties of magnetism until TS opens closer to our timespace quantum level at the top of the energy turned stone. T.O.E. NEED HELP w/MATH
StandardDeviation72 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos 2
Comment removed
StandardDeviation72 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
So... This confirms the 4th dimension... how?
cowgoesmoo2 1 month ago
@cowgoesmoo2 the fourth dimension is time
maxdorries 1 month ago
Epic is overused
justinwbohner 1 month ago
if time is distorted by movement... wouldn't that also make our measurements to other planets/stars wrong?? because the time would be distorted therefore
"1 Lightyear" would be
"the distance light travels in 1 year without going near anything but earth"
Danrakich 2 months ago
@Danrakich with the theory of special relativity if you are moving at 99 percent the speed of light one light year would only take one day from your perspective. light moves at an unvariable speed and one light year is a distance calculated without gravity taken into account
maxdorries 1 month ago
@maxdorries but this is talking about time moving in a strange pattern, not just gravity :o
Danrakich 1 month ago
@Danrakich it is just gravity, as gravity pullas spacetime towards the center of earth, for example, the rotation of the earth causes a swirl in spacetime this is a result of space and time being one 'fabric' as einstien said, time isn't moving in a strange pattern at all it's moving as einstien said it would due to gravity
maxdorries 1 month ago
@maxdorries if we could manipulate gravity, we could repel time, which doesnt sound right
Danrakich 1 month ago
Question then. If mass creates a trampoline effect in space time, where is the plane? For something to create this indentation, say on our trampoline, that would imply that it is sitting on a flat surface to create this indentation. So where is the plane of space time that we sit upon?
maghee317 2 months ago
@maghee317 You're looking at it wrong. See, to be able to physically imagine the effect you have to replace one dimension with another. A better if more difficult to sympathize way is that this [plane] were omnipresent in our physical dimensions, and the [depressions] would be more like blobs where they'd be located in each physical dimension.
iceball3xd 2 months ago
@maghee317 here is a better 3d representation of space-time. Most test books/videos use a 2d representation because it's easier to graphically depict/explain.
/watch?v=a7uTKwbsFtg&feature=related
halvepupose1 2 months ago
@maghee317 the plane is everywhere the trampoline is a two dimensional representation of three dimentional space and time is thrown out all together. space and time are distorted, but space is pulled inwards towards the center of earth
maxdorries 1 month ago
@maghee317 look at a clock, each tick is 1 second, 1 second is as long as a clock takes to tick, so we are on the plane of 1^1... 1 second per second
Danrakich 1 month ago
They should include something like absolute time which is independent
TheWtfnousername 2 months ago
@TheWtfnousername ...and completely arbitrary, Any basis of absolute time would have to be "relative" to a zero point. Newton's theory works well for the acceleration and gravitation we experience every day, but relativity explains the bigger picture.
Infrared63 2 months ago
Wow. Im so impressed. The way these 2 have actually managed to explain absolutely nothing about the discovery or the implications of it is mindboggling. I take this video as a personal insult. From the looks of it these 2 would have a hard time even changing an infants diaper.
slopet6 2 months ago
those two dudes look at each ther like they are gonna make out
I was like wtf... at the end o fth evideo they both look into each others eyes like "You sure do have a puurddy mouth"
KingAtlas4200 3 months ago
They proved nothing.
If you really want to know how the Universe works,forget einstein and his cronies (sagan,hawkings).
Look for and read the works of Tesla,Keely and Walter Russell.
ElectricSparq 3 months ago 2
@ElectricSparq lol, forget Einstein? What about all of the predictions that Einstein and the theory have made that have been confirmed? We see light being bent by gravity, and we have to constantly compensate for time dilation on our gps satellites...
elatus 2 months ago
@elatus
Light is now "bent" by gravity?
What is "gravity"?
Actually,go look up Bill Gaede and get your answers.
ElectricSparq 2 months ago
@ElectricSparq "Einstein" and "his cronies"? You can subscribe to whatever scientific philosophy you want, but you really just sound like a troll here.
capefeather 2 months ago
@capefeather
Anyone checking your channel can see that you live in fantasy land.
ElectricSparq 2 months ago
@ElectricSparq Man, you're not even trying...
capefeather 2 months ago
@ElectricSparq Tesla I know, Russell has an interesting perspective and I intend to read more on him. But from what I read on wiki, Keely was a shyster.
Infrared63 2 months ago
Comment removed
Zoroasterrrr 3 months ago
muted, banned,added to ignore list....
Signed Epic (NASA)
Zoroasterrrr 3 months ago
I see multiple videos talking about this but no one is saying what the implication is. What does this mean on Earth relative to the rest of the Universe?
FlargidyTV 3 months ago
@FlargidyTV I dont think it means much. It was long predicted by special relativity, just like black holes were and then they were confirmed. It seems like it wasn't even unexpected, just further evidence in favor of special relativity.
elatus 2 months ago
Einstein's theory was proved in 1919...this is some extra proof
Neueregel 3 months ago
@Neueregel: Exactly. There are so many proofs of general relativity that it’s barely conceivable why there are still people who seriously doubt it. Newer proofs just give higher precision, that’s all. See atomic clock experiments, gravitational lensing research, loss of energy in dual star systems, gravitational time dilation and whatnot.
albedoshader 3 months ago
The theories on time seem to be irrelevant since time is only for those who have an end for endless and ageless there is no time.
Even if a person travels at the speed of light the time does not stop for him for his time is ticking with his heart beats, he can not detach himself from time. The time will only stop for him, at whatever speed he travels, when his heart stops and he is dead. I feel these theories have more of the form than the substance.
ANUPAM4BMW 4 months ago
In space there is no direction..so the earth should apply same pressure above it due to its rotation, creating a dent in that imaginary space time axis. Nice attempt though...
in short if some views the earth upside down so that south pole is on top- explain that now!!!
pankyaomatic 4 months ago
NASA and Einstein FAILS with Gravity Probe B tests. Let us assume everything that was said it right. That the Earth can rest on the 'Frame of the Universe' and is dragging in Space-Time. That means the Sun does the same being of greater gravitational force. Like a bowling ball on a giant rubber like sheet material. Anyone would assume the Earth a small ball, would be falling TOWARD the Sun because of the drag and the Sun's influence. EXCEPT THE EARTH IS MOVING AWAY FROM THE SUN. GRADE F-.
sclausi30 4 months ago
@sclausi30 I read this a while ago not sure 100% sure on accuracy but if you are interested you can look it up.
"...our planet's mass is raising a tiny but sustained tidal bulge in the sun. They calculate that, thanks to Earth, the sun's rotation rate is slowing by 3 milliseconds per century (0.00003 second per year). According to their explanation, the distance between the Earth and sun is growing because the sun is losing its angular momentum..."
PhalanxSystem 4 months ago
@PhalanxSystem: It’s the same mechanism that’s working in the earth-moon system—eventually leading to tidal locking of both. That’s because the angular momentum is conserved in the system.
albedoshader 3 months ago
@sclausi30: Apparently you don’t know the laws of energy/momentum conservation, not to speak of centripetal force etc. Grade F-
albedoshader 3 months ago
Einstein's theory is questionable now.
TheDeathAvengers 4 months ago
Christopher Reeves, we won't forget you.
oliverecords 5 months ago
i have known this for a while . if we can just create a artificial gravity well we can make warp travel possible . cool beans
jamesdenverjenkins 6 months ago
Great Scott !!! This is Heavy!
thewhitebass 6 months ago
Space isn´t flat like a trampoline. So the graphic is wrong in that sense, so where is the centre of the vortex it can´t be under the earth
bicnarok 6 months ago
If Einstein was amazing, the scientists as NASA are just about good.
manusharma23 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
god bless thank you NASA for verifying proving Einsteins 4D Space time Warping and Vortex
lavakafle 6 months ago
But, this doesn't explain Why the earth rotates, why does it rotate in the first place?:o
chillincello 7 months ago
@chillincello study the "Conservation of Angular Momentum" :)
BritainiaNumberOne 7 months ago
@BritainiaNumberOne Thanks man!:P
chillincello 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can any plz tell me what the hell is going to happen to the earth??? is it gonna be sollowed by that F****** Vortex???? any near furture????
Dilshan123321 8 months ago
can any plz tell me what the hell is going to happen to the earth??? is it gonna be sollowed by that F****** Vortex???? any near furture????
Dilshan123321 8 months ago
@Dilshan123321 No. That will never happen. Imagine that space-time is a trampoline. Imagine Earth as a person. If a person sits on the trampoline, things get closer to them. Imagine the Moon as a ball. If I put a ball on the trampoline, the ball will come close to the person. This is (sort of) a simulation about the gravitational pull.
9imgood 8 months ago
thank you very much!!!.. i got a clear idea!!! much appreciate your answer....
Dilshan123321 6 months ago
Are you guys actually making fun of it or what ? :D
utubepredator 8 months ago
The real question is; how did one man (Einstein) without the technology, tools of modern science was able to describe or theorize what it will take decades hundred if not thousands of people and millions of dollars to confirm? Maybe he cheated; he travel from to the future and started talking about stuff that was common knowledge to all.
bladestarX 8 months ago
@bladestarX ,
~ yeah, lol i had the same theory about our dear friend Einstein. Seriously the thought has crossed my mind and it's perplexing!!!
bellabri10y 8 months ago
Does this mean that Superman flying around the earth fast enough he can go back in time like in the movie?
Robikus 8 months ago 20
@Robikus Precisely!
TheDailyConversation 8 months ago 10
@TheDailyConversation Wrong, time isnt something you can travel on or along, it just measures the change in matter.
bicnarok 6 months ago
@bicnarok If you mean that time doesn't change then no, you are wrong. Time slows down at high speeds, time slows down in high gravity.
9hello123 6 months ago
@bicnarok Yes you are right, time is measurable, relativity doesnt prove that its the 4th dimension, rather nothing proves there is a fourth dimension unless we see objects and humans appear out of the blue, like ghosts or yogis..
pankyaomatic 4 months ago
@TheDailyConversation You can't travel back in time, just to to the future. When youre driving or running your life will be longer, a little bit but longer.When supermans mate will be as old as him,and superman will fly around earth fast enough .... Than when he will stop he will be younger that his mate on earth... True story, sory for my english
ufomail 1 month ago
@Robikus of course not!
BrunoJMR 5 months ago
@Robikus How the fuck did superman got his centripetal force?
TheWtfnousername 2 months ago
@TheWtfnousername Because he's from Krypton he can fly.
ShadeToSun 2 months ago
I love this theory its pretty awesome...even though I suck at math..but still..I love it.
zoidberg96913 9 months ago
@theRekcabofD: Be wary of your physics teachers and texts. You will have to answer "text referenced " on your tests, but don't place blind faith in said texts. E.g., you will find most texts have the wrong explanation of what a photon is and how they move. The most popular mistake is "a magnetic field propagates an electric field which in turn propagates a magnetic field," ad infintum.That could not be more wrong. Since both are forms of the same force, one cannot propagate the other. peace
somthinjustaintright 9 months ago
@theRekcabofD With all due respect, in a word, no. However, it was very good thinking. The moon slows the earth's rotation as the earth slowed the moon's rotation. I can see how one might reach that conclusion. But there is no friction between the 2 orbs. Since gravity has no rest mass, (an "off and on again" debate in small quarters) there is only "Frame Drag." Friction requres two objects with rest mass, proximity, gravity, & their realtive motion. Email my chnl to discuss:-)love this stuff.
somthinjustaintright 9 months ago
Every science magazine they keep having "was Einstein Wong" on the cover, and every time they get data he's proven right yet again. DON'T QUESTION THE MASTER, son. Schooled by Einstein again.
FabulousLakeTahoe 9 months ago
English please !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bonasi678 9 months ago
I'm too stupid to understand this.
RobNLynchburgVA 9 months ago
we need to clone Einstein.
fantasticshokh 9 months ago 37
@fantasticshokh are you absolutely positive that if you do that you'll get the same exact einstein? what about growing up? what if something happens along the way and he takes the wrong path? or he gets an accident and his brain malfunctions. or his parents did something else that made him a genius and you're not able to do it with the clone.
forinner 1 month ago
@forinner the clone's personality would differ, but his cognitive ability would be equivalent.
fantasticshokh 1 month ago
@fantasticshokh what about isaac newton, gallileo gallilee, or socrates?
maxdorries 1 month ago
@maxdorries maybe Isaac newton too, on the condition of dropping his fairytale beliefs
fantasticshokh 1 month ago
@fantasticshokh having been raised in this time rather than nearly four hundred years ago isaac newton would be a quantum physicist and would have new beliefs. are you referring to his belief that the second coming of christ will be in the year 2060?
maxdorries 1 month ago
@maxdorries i'm refering to his theism. but you're right, he would have had a different set of beliefs had he lived in this time.
fantasticshokh 1 month ago
Magnets, how do they work
TheEndoro 9 months ago 3
It's a good thing we're cutting NASA's budget! And that we're moving to privative them! The Holy See must be relieved!
tcdowning666 9 months ago
do this test at home drop some thing in the toilet and flush observe even you can make a vortex
mcpsoundman 9 months ago
shit i could toldem that einstein was right they just had to take my word for it
liljoke2050 9 months ago
"...and how his ideas have stood the test of time." derp
bunnycatch3r 9 months ago
It doesn't confirm time, it confirms that matter distorts space. It has nothing to do with time. In fact, no experiment has ever confirmed that time is a specific force or dimension, or even a component of either. Hence the papers in Physics Essays by Amrit Sorli, Davide Fiscaletti, and Dusan Klinar from the Scientific Research Centre Bistra in Ptuj, Slovenia in which they consider that time may not exist at all except as a serial measurement of distance or frequency.
OriginalTharios 9 months ago
@OriginalTharios True, time is simply "energy dependent motion over a distance." It is an artifact of a human Newtonian construct, obligatory to General Relativity. Since time is energy dependent, there can be no such thing as time travel into the past. Time dilation, as in the Twin Paradox makes many think that time travel is possible. It is not and never will be. You cannot "un-use" that energy. You can only use more. Email my channel for discussion. I love this stuff.
somthinjustaintright 9 months ago
@OriginalTharios Bravo!!!!!
pankyaomatic 4 months ago
How can a spacecraft have drag?
fatkat444 9 months ago
I don't understand the principles fully, but from what I did grasp this is very interesting. I will have to look into it more to fully understand. Great video as always!
PeaceRocker01 9 months ago
Who didn't like this?
Someone expecting NASA to say:
"Tides come in, Tides go out - can't be explained."
calmreason 9 months ago 31
@calmreason Must have went over their heads, alot of it went over mine. But how can you not respect the patience and diligence of those involved...52 years!
mojosideburns 9 months ago
@calmreason I think some people didnt like the way it was presented by these two fellas
TheOkham 9 months ago
What boggles my mind is Einstein had no way to test his predictions, yet he made them. He might have made a mistake in his calculations which experimental results would uncover, but he did not have that option.
menthol5 9 months ago
@menthol5 People have proposed that he stole his ideas from other people, after all he did work at a patent office, and failed at math when in school.
DJMight 9 months ago
@DJMight rather then trash Einstein with bullshit rumors give some facts. He won a Nobel prize for the photoelectric effect. He discovered the wave/particle duality of light. He determined the speed of light to be the limiting factor in cosmic communication. Einstein worked at Princeton. He was brilliant. What is your fucking problem?
menthol5 9 months ago 2
The probe does not confirm anything except that a force may exist that acts upon same in a manner that COULD be a gravitational fluctuation as predicted by Einstein.
Similar results can be expected through other effects, and any possible relationship withto space-time warp theories is very possibly co-incidental. Not everything that sounds like like a fart is a fart.
bababamoto 9 months ago
Sooo we have finally found wtf gravity is!, sweet!
MrNinjaSpartan 9 months ago
I'm not sure how this is new, since it's pretty much been known for years. The time differences based on gravity is not only tested, but practical (effects GPS's).
Maybe I'm not understanding this story enough. I'll have to read the full article me thinks.
bersaba 9 months ago
@bersaba This experiment has proved that Gravity literally warps space time. The effect of gravity on time was tested a long time ago the the astronomer Shapiro but no experiment was ever conducted to measure the twisting of space time.
muzammilali007 9 months ago
@bersaba More evidence is always good.
GPS and other "knowns" are usually based on theory but they are more mathematical than experimental.
This is an experimental confirmation of a mathematical proof I believe.
I may have wording wrong as i am not a scientist, but I believe you would be surprised how much we do based on math more than experiment.
I mean, its possible to impliment something without a complete understanding of it.
Failing at explaining, but thats my thoughts.
waltermh111 9 months ago
@waltermh111
Yeah that would make sense. I'll see if I can read the full press release or whatever after work today.
Thanks for the reply.
bersaba 9 months ago
and this does what for us exactly?
whittle4u 9 months ago
@whittle4u This makes GPS work and increases the chances of keeping people alive by providing aircrafts with a precision navigation system. And so does his Theory of Special Relativity. Also not to forget the Spontaneous Emission of Photons from Bose-Einstein Correlations that makes LASERS work.
muzammilali007 9 months ago
@muzammilali007 But we already have those things, right?
whittle4u 9 months ago
@muzammilali007 Yes we do but they became possible only because of the physics einstein discovered. The same is true for other discoveries in science. And he didn't put them forward thinking; hmmmmm, one day people will invent GPS for navigation and lasers for optics and a zillion other things.
muzammilali007 9 months ago
Break it down.. Honey Time. Doo Doodie Doo..
petehjr1 9 months ago
Michio Kaku had address the existence of possibly up to 9 dimensions. It is addressed in his string theory. Einstein was a theoretical physicist while Tesla was a hands on inventor and once again people are left unaware of his contribution due to the fact that the US govt confiscated his personal papers upon his death. Sad
420debsc 9 months ago
Michio Kaku has written about the possible existence of more than 3 dimensions, possibly up to 9 dimensions. This is included in his string theory. But what is upsetting to me here is that once again Nikola Tesla has been left completely out of the picture concerning space time. Einstein was a theoretical physicist while Tesla was a hands on inventor. He produced personal experiment on this very subject but all was lost when the US govt confiscated his personal papers after his death.
420debsc 9 months ago
and folks wanna stop funding NASA - boy, folks who want NASA shut down really reveal their ignorance with such an opinion.
cruiscinlan 9 months ago
We should have put him in a robot body when we still had the chance
Oh well what's what Stephen Hawking is for
carygoleman 9 months ago
Because NASA NEEEEEEVER is wrong or blows anything out of proportion.
inademv 9 months ago
I am just going to pretend a magic wizard is controlling everything much easier.
Tony007corp 9 months ago
Wow! Thanks!
ONESPECIES 9 months ago
Makes sense, I live in 4D!
wasy35 9 months ago
So does this confirm the expanding universe theory
rageatm4life 9 months ago
@rageatm4life Hubble confirmed that by measuring the red shift of objects at various distances.
snackynak 9 months ago
@rageatm4life no.
Ex0dus111 9 months ago
@rageatm4life Not really, try to imagine a sort of whirlpool of space moving around the earth, the vacumn of space is being twisted in this vortex caused by the Gravity of earth. Since the earth is so small, relatively speaking it is pretty imperceptible and needs extremely sensitive detectors to measure it.
What it says is that there is a space time field around the earth.
valhala56 9 months ago